Calcutta High Court

The Supreme Court noted, “The rights of an individual are always subservient to the nation’s interest, the High Court fell in error in granting bail.”

Mamata govt repeatedly attempts to include Muslims in the OBC list in Bengal, despite consistent rejections from the courts.

West Bengal’s decision to scrap all industry incentives since 1993 has been labelled “unconstitutional” by major companies, reviving concerns that successive governments have crippled the state’s economy by driving out industry while focusing on populist politics.

The High Court said that solely social media content without any mention of the date, time and place of the concert cannot be a ground for taking cognisance of such offence.

Notably, the TMC government in West Bengal submitted that the perpetrators were from ‘socially backward’ background and ‘slow learners’ at school with little to no education.

Cases where courts show the convicts of brutal crimes leniency often leave an impression on the minds of people that perhaps the 'reformation' or the 'prospects' of convicts weigh more in the minds of judges than the rights of innocent victims.

On 3rd June 2025, the Calcutta High Court rejected the bail plea of Sharmishta Panoli, saying “heavens will not fall” if the ad-interim bail plea is not accepted and the case is heard later for bail.

The Supreme Court on Thursday cancelled bail granted by the Calcutta HC granting bail to five accused in a rioting and attempt to rape case during the post-poll violence in West Bengal.