Nupur Sharma

Tragically, this imported radical outcry did not stay confined behind Pakistan's borders. It bled into India, where radical Muslims and their enablers have successfully normalised it on Indian streets.

The bench rejected the business dispute defence, noting deliberate exposure of the victim, covert participation through intermediaries, and cumulative circumstantial evidence. It held bail standards under UAPA require only prima facie truth at this stage.

The digital age has transformed oral judicial remarks into viral controversies. Judges’ comments, once private exchanges, now trigger nationwide debates, exposing ideological hypocrisy and challenging the long-held liberal monopoly over courtroom narratives.

On 3rd June 2025, the Calcutta High Court rejected the bail plea of Sharmishta Panoli, saying “heavens will not fall” if the ad-interim bail plea is not accepted and the case is heard later for bail.

Assim al-Hakeem appeared furious at 'Westernised Muslims' for doubting the fact and questioning the marriage of Prophet Muhammad.

It was Justice Suryakant who was one of the judges that made vicious comments against the very victim they were meant to protect. It was this very Supreme Court which incentivised the vilification of Nupur Sharma that Abhinav Chandrachud indulged in today.

The Print has targeted Nupur Sharma despite the fact that she was hounded unfairly for over two years. On the other hand, the media house completely ignored Rehmani's role in the issue.

The Supreme Court emphasized that in the digital age, judges have to exercise extreme caution while expressing themselves.

The National Investigation Agency (NIA) had arrested Mohammed Javed from Udaipur, Rajasthan, on July 22, 2022, 20 days after the brutal beheading of Kanhaiya Lal.