‘I have been stabbed in the back’: Sidhu after Punjab govt opposed his acquittal in 1988 road rage case

The Punjab government on Thursday told the Supreme Court that Punjab and Haryana Court court that it supported the Court’s decision of convicting its tourism and culture minister Navjot Singh Sidhu in a 30-year-old road rage case, and that he should serve three years in jail as ordered by the court of law. As per reports, Navjot Singh Sidhu voiced his displeasure with his own government by saying that ‘I have been stabbed in the back’.

Mr Sidhu had allegedly hit a 65-year-old man, Gurnam Singh, on the head during an argument on a road in Patiala on  December 27, 1988. Gurnam Singh died in hospital of a haemorrhage.

The Trial Court had acquitted Sidhu, whereas the Punjab and Haryana High Court reversed his acquittal, convicting him under Section 304 Part II, IPC, for culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

- Advertisement - - Article resumes -

According to reports, on 1st December 2006, Navjot Singh Sidhu was convicted by a High Court division bench comprising Justices Mehtab Singh Gill and Baldev Singh. Sidhu had admitted to the crime at the time of occurrence and that he had no enmity with the deceased. Sidhu, he said, was named in the FIR.

After his conviction in 2006, the victim’s sons expressed his satisfaction with the Court’s decision. Jaswinder Singh, son of Gurnam Singh, had then said that he and members of his family, particularly his mother Bimaljit Kaur were satisfied with the verdict of the Punjab and Haryana High Court.

In 2007, the Supreme Court suspended Mr Sidhu’s sentence and granted him bail after he appealed his conviction by the Punjab and Haryana High Court. The suspended sentence enabled him to contest the Lok Sabha by-polls from Amritsar.

The Captain Amarinder Singh led Punjab government had recently told the Supreme Court, “There is no evidence that the person in the road rage died because of a heart attack.” The Punjab govt effectively contradicted its own minister, Sidhu, who had argued in court that Gurnam Singh died of a heart attack.

The government also told the bench of Justice Jasti Chelameswar and Justice SK Kaul that Mr Sidhu’s statement denying his involvement in the incident was false.

Officials say the government had no choice but to oppose the minister in court. After arguing against Mr Sidhu in the High Court, it could not change its stand before the Supreme Court.


Share This Post and Support:
We need your support to survive in the media industry. Please consider paying us for the content we produce:

To know more about these payments, please click here.


Most read articles recently

Pakistan quotes The Quint, Karan Thapar and Praveen Swami to brand Kulbhushan Jadhav as a ‘RAW spy’ at ICJ

Pakistan quoted several articles published in Indian to present its case during Kulbhushan Jadhav hearing at the International Court of Justice
How Ravish Kumar and Vinod Dua misled people about ‘martyr status’ to CRPF jawans after Pulwama attack

How Ravish Kumar and Vinod Dua misled people about ‘martyr status’ to CRPF jawans

Ravish Kumar of NDTV is a man known for many lows. But this may well be his lowest point.
Image Source: The Week

Mandya: Actor-turned-politician Prakash Raj attends funeral of Pulwama martyr, villagers expose his hypocrisy towards Armed Forces

Prakash Raj, a left wing ideologue, who is often known for joining hands with the left-liberals to express their hate towards Hindus and the BJP, has plans to contest in the upcoming elections from Bengaluru Central Lok Sabha constituency.

The Hindu not only cropped the Rafale dissent note, but also had digitally manipulated it

Comparison of Hindu document with ANI document shows that Hindu had doctored the Rafale dissent note

Kavita Krishnan uses 4 year old photograph to claim PM Narendra Modi was laughing after Pulwama attack

Using a old photo, Kavita Krishna claimed the Modi was having fun at election rallies after Pulwama attack

Imran Khan’s deranged statement on Pulwama terror attack tailor-made to appeal to Indian ‘liberal’ sensibilities

In his statement on the Pulwama terror attack, Imran Khan claimed that his country had nothing to gain from attacking India. Apart from that, he threatened India with retaliation should the Indian Army decide to attack Pakistan.

Pakistan minister says ‘bells won’t toll in temples’, he forgets, India is the land of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj

Sheikh Rashid Ahmad, Federal Minister for Pakistani Railways, commented that should anyone look at Pakistan in a negative manner, then "the eyes will be ripped out, the grass will not grow, the birds will not chirp and the bells won't toll in Temples."
Image Source: Swarajya

Ten things India must do to stop being a soft state

India is overly defensive. Despite its massive economic and military power, it does not respond to grave provocations (26/11, for example). It does not retaliate when attacked. It tolerates countless attacks on its citizens and affronts to its prestige.
Article 370

Article 370 must go: BJP can’t pussyfoot any longer

So what is this Article 370 which allows J&K to function much against the national (or for that matter, it’s own) interests?
Amar Singh donates property worth Rs 15 crore to RSS-affiliated Seva Bharti.

Amar Singh donates ancestral properties worth 15 crores to RSS-affiliated organisation Seva Bharti

Amar Singh donated Rs 15 crore property to Seva Bharti, an RSS affiliated social service organisation.

Latest articles

Connect with us

137,866FansLike
110,751FollowersFollow
23,260SubscribersSubscribe

Don't miss these