Don’t forget that there is a ‘political context’ to Shujaat Bukhari’s murder

The murder of Shujaat Bukhari by terrorists last night left me in all sorts of quandaries. On the one hand, there was the purely human element, the need to express condolences to the family of the murdered man and demand punishment for his killers.

At the same time, I needed to take a stand against the left wing brigade on Twitter who were behaving disgracefully, trying to use the murder as an excuse to shame everyone who disagreed with the outrageous views the man had expressed during his lifetime. But I also had to do this without appearing to be kicking the dead body of a victim of terrorism.

Having zero formal training in journalistic writing, I was truly struggling.

- Advertisement - - Article resumes -

And then the idea struck me like a lightning bolt. Rajdeep Sir! I could look through the writings of India’s numero uno political analyst and borrow some words/ideas from there.

I needed to find the perfect balance, a sublime way to make my point that would be fair to all. A form of writing that is truly subtle and classy and sensitive. I found this article written by Rajdeep Sardesai in The News Minute.

Untitled.png

Brilliant writing! Absolutely brilliant writing! And a standing ovation to The News Minute for publishing such brilliant writing.

Even the Scroll had printed the same “nuanced” take by Rajdeep Sardesai.

Mr Shujaat Bukhari was the editor of ‘Rising Kashmir’, an influential voice in the valley. He has self admittedly expressed pride in being intolerant. Don’t believe me? See this:

Untitled.png

Here is Mr Shujaat Bukhari’s shocking take on the terror attack at the offices of the magazine Charlie Hebdo in Paris.

Untitled.png

As many as 12 journalists murdered and Mr Shujaat Bukhari’s response is to kick the victims’ dead bodies and their grieving families in the teeth. To tell them to draw a line and stay clear of faith. To say that it is a case of “lessons learnt.”

Or take this absolutely chilling tweet, also in response to Charlie Hebdo attacks.

It also comes as no surprise that Mr Shujaat Bukhari has also been involved in deliberately misrepresenting actions of Indian security forces in Kashmir.

Untitled.png

Considering how sensitive this material is, there is no saying how wicked such an action is.

Any killing is wrong. Mr Bukhari did not deserve to die under any circumstances but there is a “political context to his death” as there would be when Pakistani Army bases are attacked by Islamic terrorists. The Pakistani Army has done it’s very best towards training, supporting and shielding Islamic terrorists. But because of the inherently irrational and violent nature of terrorists, the same jihadis have been known to carry out brutal attacks against the very hands that fed them.

As such, it is disgraceful for the pseudo-secularists to use this moment to score points against Indian critics of Mr Shujaat Bukhari.

Untitled.png

Colour me confused. How exactly are “Twitter fundamentalists” the issue here?

A particular target of pseudo-secular attacks turned out to be a scientist and political commentator Anand Ranganathan, for the mere accident that he recalled some of Mr Bukhari’s outrageous quotes a few days ago. Sample this truly puzzling tweet from the health and science editor of The Hindu.

Untitled.png

Huh? What is wrong with quoting Mr Bukhari’s publicly expressed views? And as for “sitting on a high horse and pinning agendas” on people who might have to “face bullets”, will reporters of ‘liberal’ news outlets remember this when they discuss the actions of Indian security forces?

“Sitting on a high horse and pinning agendas”, you say.  Like the times when cosy “political scientists” write articles comparing the Indian Army in Kashmir to General Dyer? In fact, wasn’t Mr Bukhari choosing to do exactly this when he suggested that crushing Kashmiris under the wheel might be a deliberate action from the CRPF?

Or take this one from another liberal, who seems to be implying that right-wing twitter might have perfected time travel.

Untitled.png

Unfortunately, bashing right-wingers have become a large multi-national industry, backed up by big money and big institutional power, run by people who believe they are so right and so moral that they have a mandate to monopolize the flow of information. This is not about million dollar left wing channels and news portals versus right-wing twitter, this is about punishing terrorists. Nothing else matters.

Rajdeep Sardesai gave a “political context” to the brutal killing of Prashant Poojary. The News Minute, among many others, published that view and the “liberal” media applauded the nuance. Where is that same “nuance” now?


Share This Post and Support:
We need your support to survive in the media industry. Please consider paying us for the content we produce:

To know more about these payments, please click here.


Most read articles recently

How Ravish Kumar and Vinod Dua misled people about ‘martyr status’ to CRPF jawans after Pulwama attack

How Ravish Kumar and Vinod Dua misled people about ‘martyr status’ to CRPF jawans

Ravish Kumar of NDTV is a man known for many lows. But this may well be his lowest point.

Pakistan quotes The Quint, Karan Thapar and Praveen Swami to brand Kulbhushan Jadhav as a ‘RAW spy’ at ICJ

Pakistan quoted several articles published in Indian to present its case during Kulbhushan Jadhav hearing at the International Court of Justice

Kavita Krishnan uses 4 year old photograph to claim PM Narendra Modi was laughing after Pulwama attack

Using a old photo, Kavita Krishna claimed the Modi was having fun at election rallies after Pulwama attack

The Hindu not only cropped the Rafale dissent note, but also had digitally manipulated it

Comparison of Hindu document with ANI document shows that Hindu had doctored the Rafale dissent note

Imran Khan’s deranged statement on Pulwama terror attack tailor-made to appeal to Indian ‘liberal’ sensibilities

In his statement on the Pulwama terror attack, Imran Khan claimed that his country had nothing to gain from attacking India. Apart from that, he threatened India with retaliation should the Indian Army decide to attack Pakistan.
Image Source: Swarajya

Ten things India must do to stop being a soft state

India is overly defensive. Despite its massive economic and military power, it does not respond to grave provocations (26/11, for example). It does not retaliate when attacked. It tolerates countless attacks on its citizens and affronts to its prestige.
Major Vibhuti Dhoundiyal was martyred with 3 other soldiers in Pulwama during an encounter

A teary adieu to Major Vibhuti Dhoundiyal: Married only last year, he made the ultimate sacrifice so we can live

Major Dhoundiyal along with three soldiers was killed in an encounter with terrorists in Pulwama district.

Meet the people whose main concern is if Modi may ‘benefit’ due to terror strike, not tears of martyrs’ families

While the Country held its breath and read gut-wrenching stories of the Jawans martyred in the Pulwama attack, the 'liberals' were more concerned about politics than the tears of the martyr's families.

Pakistan minister says ‘bells won’t toll in temples’, he forgets, India is the land of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj

Sheikh Rashid Ahmad, Federal Minister for Pakistani Railways, commented that should anyone look at Pakistan in a negative manner, then "the eyes will be ripped out, the grass will not grow, the birds will not chirp and the bells won't toll in Temples."

Man whose number was made public by Barkha Dutt for stalking, claims he is getting threatening calls, says didn’t abuse Barkha

In her tweet, Barkha demanded the Home Minister of the country, Rajnath Singh, himself intervene in the matter which is routinely dealt with by local Police.

Latest articles

Connect with us

137,523FansLike
110,477FollowersFollow
23,140SubscribersSubscribe

Don't miss these