Home Editor's picks Here is why furious CJI Ranjan Gogoi came down heavily on The Wire

Here is why furious CJI Ranjan Gogoi came down heavily on The Wire

Although Nariman clarified that there was no violation, the Apex Court didn’t seem to be impressed with that argument.

“We don’t think anyone of you deserves a hearing”, Chief Justice of India, Ranjan Gogoi and his bench opined in the matter concerning the CBI and its two top officials, Director Alok Verma and his deputy Rakesh Asthana.

The Supreme Court was enraged as to how the leftist propaganda website The Wire accessed Alok Verma’s responses to the queries of Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) which were supposed to be in a sealed cover.

CJI went on to chastise the litigant by observing:

“We expressed that highest degree of confidentiality should be maintained and this litigant takes the papers and shares it with everyone. Our respect for this institution is not shared by anyone for some strange reason”

- Advertisement - - Article resumes -

In the report that The Wire published, it claims that Verma questions the integrity of CVC as an independent investigator. He also alleges that “the CVC seems to be on a roving expedition to cast aspersions on my integrity and impartiality.” The CVC is looking into four specific charges against Verma that Special Director Asthana made against him. These include, One, his role in deliberately letting people off the hook in the IRCTC Case involving convicted Former Bihar CM Lalu Prasad Yadav. Two, creating roadblocks in Moin Qureshi case. Three, inducting IPS officers in CBI whose records were not clean and four, tipping off an ex-deputy director of Enforcement Directorate about possible raids at his house.

The Wire published Director Alok Verma’s response to these allegations wherein he says, in the IRCTC Case, Bihar Deputy CM Sushil Modi and an official of PMO were following up the case and adds that he did not want to rush through the case “without following the due process.” He also goes on to claim that “Asthana was a party in each of his decisions, which the special director now alleges to be a procedural violation.”

One must realise that these are allegations and counters by two top officials of the CBI regarding matters now being heard by the Apex Court. Media running these have implications on National Security and that is why perhaps, the CJI was upset at the leak.

When the CJI gave the TheWire’s retort to Alok Verma’s lawyer, Fali Nariman, he suggested that the SC should summon the person who ran the story

“What can we do with all these people (media) snooping around? Wanting to know this, wanting to know that. This was completely unauthorised. I’m very disturbed by this. I would suggest you summon the person who has carried this story. How can this come?”

Meanwhile, sensing trouble, The Wire tried to downplay the incident by tweeting “These are the stories The Wire published based on Alok Verma’s responses to a questionnaire the CVC sent him. These have nothing to do with Verma’s reply to the CVC’s final report, which the Supreme Court wanted in a sealed cover.”

This clarification of The Wire and the submission made by Fali Nariman opens up more questions on the leak.

Although Nariman clarified that there was no violation, the Apex Court didn’t seem to be impressed with that argument.

It remains to be seen if the Editors at The Wire will be called in for Contempt of Court under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.

The Act clearly states the following:

Section 7 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971:

PUBLICATION OF INFORMATION RELATING TO PROCEEDING IN CHAMBERS OR IN CAMERA NOT CONTEMPT EXCEPT IN CERTAIN CASES:

Section 7(1)(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971:

Where the court, on grounds of public policy or in the exercise of any power vested in it, expressly prohibits the publication of all information relating to the proceeding or of information of the description which is published.

Sec 7(1)(d) of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971:

Where the information relates to a secret process, discovery or invention which is an issue in the proceedings.

Sec 7(2) of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971:

Without prejudice to the provisions contained in subsection (1) a person shall not be guilty of contempt of court for publishing the text or a fair and accurate summary of the whole, or any part, of an order made by a court sitting in chambers or in camera, unless the court has expressly prohibited the publication thereof on grounds of public policy, or for reasons connected with public order or the security of the State, or on the ground that it contains information relating to secret process, discovery or invention, or in exercise of any power vested on it.

One can argue that considering the matter involves the top investigating agency of the country, the leak of sealed information to the media is an issue of public order and since the reporters of The Wire cast their doubts over the role of the Prime Minister’s Office in their subsequent reports, this might affect the security of the state as well.

All of this makes us question if The Wire and its reporters want to purposely present Alok Verma’s side of the story to help him garner public sympathy and somehow manage to tarnish the image of the Modi Government, whom the TheWire and its reporters love to hate.

It also raises doubts as to whose interests are The Wire serving, by dragging the name of National Security Advisor and other Intelligence Officers, one wonders what effect it will have on the morale of our investigating agencies.

Sharing is caring - Share This Post and Support:
We need your support to survive in the media industry. Please consider paying us for the content we produce:

To know more about these payments, please click here.


Most read articles recently

AltNews co-founder caught shielding Islamists following the Sri Lanka terror attacks

Altnews cofounder seems to have graduated from sharing fake news himself to shielding radical Islamists

Cambridge University confirms that Rahul Gandhi did his M.Phil using the name Raul Vinci

Cambridge University confirms that Rahul Gandhi did his MPhil using the name Raul Vinci

Shekhar Gupta says ‘latest’ CVoter survey predicts BJP getting 220 in 2019 elections, Yashwant Deshmukh calls it fake news

Yashwant Deshmukh of CVoter, putting the record straight said that CVoter has respected the Election Commission embargo and has not released any vote or seat numbers once the election process started.

Rahul Gandhi talks while PM Modi delivers the Make In India promise: Apple to shift mass production of iPhones from China to India

While Bengaluru unit of Apple was already manufacturing older models, the new facility will manufacture newer phones

Air Vistara senior officials visit Gen GD Bakshi, apologise for deleting the tweet honouring him

Sanjiv Kapoor, Chief Strategy & Commercial Officer, and Deepa Chadha, Senior Vice President – Human Resources & Corporate Affairs or Air Vistara visited Maj. Gen. Bakshi and tendered an official apology

Watch: Digvijay Singh spreads the Rs. 15 lakh lie at a public rally, boy does a ‘surgical strike’ on him

Congress leader Digvijay Singh, while addressing a public rally and attacking Prime Minister Narendra Modi, tauntingly asked the people whether they received the amount of Rs 15 lakh in their accounts.
Web of dubious transactions featuring 'RG', 'SG', 'AP' and 'DKS': Tale of Kempareddy Govindaraj, Parliamentary Secretary to Siddaramaiah and the seized diary

Web of dubious transactions featuring ‘RG’, ‘SG’, ‘AP’ and ‘DKS’: Tale of K Govindaraj, Parliamentary Secretary to Siddaramaiah and the seized diary

In March 2016, the IT Department conducted raids on K. Govindaraj, Parliamentary Secretary to the then Chief Minister of Karnataka, Siddaramaiah and a member of the Legislative Council of the state.

‘Liberals’ addressing Yogi Adityanath by his birth name is a reflection of their deep seated Hinduphobia

The elevation of Yogi Adityanath to the seat of Chief Minister of India's most populous state ruffled many feathers and it's hardly surprising that they are throwing everything at him in the desperate hope that something will stick.

Convenor of Delhi Congress IT cell shares badly edited video accusing PM Modi of using an abusive word

Congress' Gaurav Pandhi has earlier also spread misinformation to attack the central government

Latest articles

Connect with us

156,879FansLike
129,628FollowersFollow
54,349SubscribersSubscribe

Don't miss these

Sharing is caring - Share This Post and Support: