As inauguration of Statue of Unity completes a month, the mindless, illogical criticism doesn’t seem to end

If one takes a closer look at the revenue generation by Statue of Unity, as on date, one can assume that over time it too, like its brethren monuments overseas will turn out to be a money- spinner, something that is definitely detrimental to the left model of governance.

Its been a month since Sardar Vallabhai Patel’s Statue of Unity was inaugurated, yet the manufactured controversy surrounding it refuses to die down. In the last few days two well known public figures tweeted on the same:

This was a tweet by a prominent industrialist Mr Harsh Goenka, to which, naturally the leading light of the left-liberal (an oxymoron!), Mr Farhan Akhtar had to respond.

As epitomized here, the biggest grouse that the naysayers seem to have is surrounding the economics of the statue, namely: the money used to make the statue, should have been invested in alleviating poverty and that the other monuments so frequently quoted by nationalists are in developed countries, funded by private parties and not the government of the day.

- Advertisement - - Article resumes -

This article is an attempt to rebut this facile argument.

The Statue of Unity, on the banks of the Narmada in Vadodara Gujarat, was constructed, for a sum of Rs 2,989 crores. It is currently the tallest statue in the world but is constantly compared with the Eiffel Tower, the Empire State Building and The Statue of Liberty. It is thus imperative to look at the other monuments which the Statue of Unity is being compared to one way or another.

Was there a controversy around Eiffel Tower?: Yes!

The Eiffel Tower, a global icon today, constructed between 1887-1889, as an entrance to the 1889 World’s fair, is 324 meters tall. During its construction, it too, much like the Statue of Unity faced criticism from a group of Artists, in France:

We, writers, painters, sculptors, architects and passionate devotees of the hitherto untouched beauty of Paris, protest with all our strength, with all our indignation in the name of slighted French taste, against the erection … of this useless and monstrous Eiffel Tower … To bring our arguments home, imagine for a moment a giddy, ridiculous tower dominating Paris like a gigantic black smokestack, crushing under its barbaric bulk Notre Dame, the Tour Saint-Jacques, the Louvre, the Dome of Les Invalides, the Arc de Triomphe, all of our humiliated monuments will disappear in this ghastly dream. And for twenty years … we shall see stretching like a blot of ink the hateful shadow of the hateful column of bolted sheet metal.

Was the Eiffel Tower cheap to construct? Was it constructed during times oEconomic Prosperity?: No to both!

Originally the cost of the tower in 1889, was close to 8 million francs, which even in 1889 amounted to a sizable cost.

But what our perfunctorily read friends in opposition and their rag-tag coalition fail to acknowledge is that the year 1889, the year of the inauguration of Eiffel tower, was also the year when the largest Bank Bailout of that time happened in France. Without going into the nuts and bolts of the crisis, suffices to say that on the evening of 7th of March, the French Minister of Finance, at that time, met the leading bankers of the day to form a plan, now called “lifeboat bailout” to rescue the Banque De France and prevent a Bank Run from happening. This was just two months before the Eiffel Tower was opened to the public. It was certainly not a case of great economic prosperity and calm in the run-up to the inauguration of the monument, as our ill-read friends from left like to claim.

Was the Eiffel Tower Privately Funded?: It was project financed. So, it was complicated!

The charge that the Eiffel Tower was a privately funded monument and that the government of the day had nothing to do with it, is not entirely correct.

Eiffel Tower is not just a feat of engineering but a financial feat too, where the public and private authorities entered into a contract to privately fund the construction cost of the tower, and then recover the same from ticket sale over a period of time.

The monument overtime would revert to public ownership once the cost got recovered. It’s an example of project financing, which is widely used for a whole lot of infrastructure projects across the world. This sort of project financing is also known as the Build, Operate Transfer model and the Public-Private Partnership or the PPP model.

What’s the point of the controversy? : Now we get to the core of the grudge!

The larger point that the left-leaning couch-economist are trying to obfuscate about is that the monuments such as Eiffel Tower, Empire State Building, Statue of Liberty, make sound economic sense since over a period of time these monuments make money many times over their construction cost.

For instance, the Eiffel tower, between 2011-2015, generated between Euro 50-60 million per annum from ticket sale alone. The Statue of Unity, earned Rs 2.1 crores in the first 10 days itself.

Add to this the fillip it gives to the growth of dependent industries, tourism, logistics, and we are looking at an economic revival model that can be easily replicated across states, across countries.

Indeed, if one takes a closer look at the revenue generation by Statue of Unity, as on date, one can assume that over time it too, like its brethren monuments overseas will turn out to be a money- spinner, something that is definitely detrimental to the left model of governance.


Share This Post and Support:
We need your support to survive in the media industry. Please consider paying us for the content we produce:

To know more about these payments, please click here.


Most read articles recently

NDTV suspends Deputy News Editor for celebrating Pulwama terror attack, may take further action

NDTV Deputy News Editor Nidhi Sethi suspended by the channel for her Facebook comment celebrating the Pulwama attack

“By the time this video reaches you, I will be in heaven”, declared JeM terrorist in video before Pulwama suicide attack

The terrorist is seen urging the people of North, Central, South Kashmir and Jammu to come together in the fight against India.

No, Times of India, Islamist terrorists harboured and nurtured by Pakistan, not ‘local youth’ killed over 40 soldiers

Times of India not only came out with a horrible headline, but there were also other issues with the reportage as well
Image Source: twitter

Vajpayee govt was forced to release Masood Azhar because of hysterical media coverage, former AAP leader Ashutosh says

The veteran journalist who is currently running his own news portal in Hindi revealed that media coverage of the hijack incident created undue pressure on the central government and they had to accept the demands of the hijackers, which included the release of three terrorists.

Congress supporting abusive troll claims Pulwama was an inside job by India

Sanjukta Basu is a very vocal Modi-hater and a bigot masquerading as a liberal feminist.

What to do with these termites? Does ‘ha-ha’ reaction to terror attacks have a religion?

For some people, just the Islamic names in these 'Allah hu Akbar' brand suicide bombers is enough to empathise with the terrorists

“He is not letting people wear helmets,” Puducherry Lt Governor’s exasperation at CM protesting against road safety rules

CM Narayanswamy has been protesting against Lt Governor Kiran Bedi for her tough stance on the use of helmets.

Soft approach has failed in Kashmir, now a decisive military action is need of the hour

India needs a strong political will backed by decisive military action in Kashmir.

If ‘terror has no religion’ was not bullsh*t enough, Congress leader Sidhu comes up with ‘terror has no nationality’

Navjot Singh Sidhu said that terrorism has no country, giving a clean chit to Pakistan despite Jaish-e-Mohammed, a terrorist group backed by the Pakistani establishment has taken the responsibility for the attack on CRPF soldiers at Pulwama.

Pulwama terror attack is a violent expression of Hinduphobia

Like crimes that are related to race, gender or caste, Hinduphobic hate crime does not take place in a vacuum.

Latest articles

Connect with us

136,116FansLike
109,243FollowersFollow
22,793SubscribersSubscribe

Don't miss these