HomeNews ReportsBombay High Court dismisses frivolous petition against power contract to Adani Group, imposes 50,000...

Bombay High Court dismisses frivolous petition against power contract to Adani Group, imposes 50,000 Rs fine on petitioner

A division bench of Chief Justice D K Upadhyaya and Justice Amit Borkar heard the case and dismissed the frivolous petition.

On Monday, December 16, the Bombay High Court dismissed a petition against a power contract awarded by the Maharashtra government to Adani Group for supply of renewable and thermal power electricity. The plea stated that the award was “unsubstantiated and reckless”. The honourable Court, while dismissing the plea, also imposed a fine of Rs 50,000 on the petitioner.

A division bench of Chief Justice D K Upadhyaya and Justice Amit Borkar heard the case and dismissed the frivolous petition.

The plea also leveled allegations against former state chief minister Eknath Shinde, who is currently the deputy CM, of having been involved in corrupt practices while awarding the contract to Adani Group. However, the petitioner’s allegations were totally unsubstantiated.

The petitioner also alleged that the contract awarded to the Adani Group for the supply of 6,600 megawatts of renewable and thermal power in Maharashtra was a violation of the petitioner’s fundamental right to have access to fair electricity supply at a reasonable rate.

However, the Bench noted, “In our opinion, filing of such petitions containing unsubstantiated and reckless averments run the risk of sometimes even good causes being lost.”

As per the Bench, the petition made “vague and unsubstantiated” assertions that the contract awarded was a scam involving government authorities.

The High Court said the petition did not contain any supporting materials to show the former chief minister Eknath Shinde was involved in any corrupt practices.

The petitioner was not a participant in the tender process of the contract, the court added.

“The petition is bereft of any substantiating and supporting material and contains absolutely bald and vague allegations,” the HC said dismissing the plea.

The court directed the Rs 50,000 cost to be deposited by the petitioner to the Maharashtra State Legal Services Authority.

Join OpIndia's official WhatsApp channel

  Support Us  

For likes of 'The Wire' who consider 'nationalism' a bad word, there is never paucity of funds. They have a well-oiled international ecosystem that keeps their business running. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

Searched termsAdani Group
OpIndia Staff
OpIndia Staffhttps://www.opindia.com
Staff reporter at OpIndia

Related Articles

Trending now

The Great Nicobar Project is something China would never want. Why are Rahul Gandhi and his mother opposing it so strongly? India’s geopolitical trump...

If anyone requires a practical demonstration of what it means to sit beside a critical strait and have the power to threaten, facilitate and weaponise global trade, Iran has been providing it since February 2026.

How India is countering China one move at a time: Military power, border infra, Taiwan links, and Japan alignment

India’s response is not designed to produce immediate results, but to build long-term advantage. Whether through strengthening border infrastructure, reducing economic dependence, or expanding regional partnerships, the approach reflects a shift toward continuous competition rather than episodic reaction.
- Advertisement -