HomeNews ReportsBudget 2018 : Government increases allocation for welfare of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes

Budget 2018 : Government increases allocation for welfare of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes

In the much awaited 2018-19 Union budget, the government has allocated Rs.56,000 crore for the welfare of Scheduled Castes and Rs.39,000 crore for Scheduled Tribes. It is an increase on the Rs.52,393 crores and Rs.31,295 crores that were earmarked for allocation for the SCs and STs in the last budget respectively.


The NDA government has increased the allocation earmarked for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes every year since it presented its second budget in 2015. In the 2015 budget, Rs.30,851 crore and Rs.19,980 crore were allocated to SCs and STs respectively. The following year, the allocation increased to Rs. 38,833 crore and Rs. 24,005 crore respectively. 2015 had seen a sharp dip however from Rs.50,548 crore and Rs.32,387 crore for SCs and STs respectively.

Join OpIndia's official WhatsApp channel

  Support Us  

For likes of 'The Wire' who consider 'nationalism' a bad word, there is never paucity of funds. They have a well-oiled international ecosystem that keeps their business running. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

K Bhattacharjee
K Bhattacharjee
Black Coffee Enthusiast. Post Graduate in Psychology. Bengali.

Related Articles

Trending now

Explained: What is the Odisha Vedanta Bauxite-mining issue, and how vested interests weaponise ‘ecological concerns’ and ‘tribal rights’ to stall a major industrial project

Odisha's bauxite mining project is the latest target of a recurring pattern of political opportunism and hollow environmentalism.

Accused of harassment, shielded MF Hussain and more: Meet Sanjay Kishan Kaul, former SC judge who has become the hero of Congress and the...

While Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul now positions himself as a staunch defender of judicial integrity and procedure through his upcoming memoir, a closer examination of his judicial track record reveals a career marked by deeply contentious rulings, persistent accusations of hurting public and religious sentiments, severe institutional conflicts, and questionable associations.
- Advertisement -