Sunday, April 5, 2026
Home Blog Page 2597

CJI DY Chandrachud urges parliament to reconsider the age of consent for sex under POCSO, says there is a growing concern about it

0

Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud has urged the parliament to revise the age of consent for sex under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO Act), saying this provision poses difficulties for judges. At present, the age of consent for sexual relationships is 18 years, and if an adult has sex with a minor even with the consent of the minor, it is considered rape.

Delivering the keynote address on a two-day national consultation on the POCSO Act organised by Supreme Court Committee on Juvenile Justice and UNICEF, CJI DY Chandrachud said that there is a growing concern around the age of consent under the Act, and it needs to be addressed.

He said this during a discussion on romantic relationships among minors. When adolescents engage in sexual activity with consent, such consent is not considered valid under POCSO, and legal actions are taken in such cases. The CJI said that when such cases reach courts, they pose difficulties for the judges, and therefore suggested that the minimum age of consent should be revisited by the parliament.

The CJI said, “You are aware that the POCSO Act criminalizes all sexual acts among those under 18 regardless of whether consent is present factually among the minors, because the presumption of the law is that there is no consent among those below 18. In my time as a judge, I have seen that this category of cases poses difficult questions for judges across the spectrum. There is a growing concern surrounding the issue which must be considered by the legislature in view of reliable research by experts in adolescent healthcare. I should leave this topic right here, as this topic is very vexed as we see in courts everyday.”

However, the CJI suggested that parliament amend the law to reduce the age of consent, instead of suggesting a judicial order to make the change in the law. Recently the central government has been vocal on the issue of the judiciary encroaching on the domain of parliament, and the CJI might have kept that in mind on the issue.

There seems to be a growing demand from the judiciary to amend the POCSO Act to reduce the age of consent for consent. The CJI’s comments came just days after Madras High Court recently said that it is ‘eagerly waiting’ for the legislature to reduce the age of consent under POCSO.

While upholding the conviction of a man accused of kidnapping and forcibly marrying a 17-year-old girl, Justice P Velmurugan of Madras High Court recently said that the court “eagerly is waiting for the amendment in the Legislature as expressed by my learned brothers.” However, the conviction was upheld by the court as the age of consent is still 18 years under the law.

The accused had contended that the relationship was consensual and that a 17-year-old can’t be considered a child. The court agreed that it is a grey area for teenagers in the age group of 16 to 18, and teenagers above 17 but below 18 may not be punished under POCSO. But the conviction was upheld by the court as the age of consent is still 18 years under the law.

The comments of the CJI and the Madras HC judge came after two different High Courts ruled that POCSO overrides Muslim personal law, and declared the marriage of minor Muslim girls invalid even though it is allowed under the personal law. In October, the Karnataka High Court said that while the marriage of Muslim girls after the age of 15 years is allowed as per Muslim Personal Law, having sex with such girls still violates the age of consent provision of POCSO. The High Court said that as POCSO is a special act, it overrides the Muslim Personal Law.

Last month, Kerala High Court delivered a similar verdict, saying that sex with minors is illegal under POCSO Act even if it is with a minor Muslim girl legally married. Justice Bechu Kurain Thomas said that if one of the partners in the marriage is a minor, offences under POCSO Act will apply, and the validity of the marriage would not be considered in such cases. The judge said that he can’t agree that an offence under the POCSO Act will not get attracted against a Muslim marrying a minor.

Like the Karnataka HC, the Kerala HC also said that although Muslims are allowed to marry minor girls under The Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, as the accused was arrested under POCSO, the special stature will prevail over the sharia law. Moreover, the court also said it is questionable whether the Muslim Personal Law overrides the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006. According to this act, the marriage of men below 21 years of age and women below 18 years of age is illegal.

Telangana: Man leads a mob to abduct 24-year-old woman from her house claiming she is his wife, victim rescued after video went viral

0

On Friday, December 9, a 24-year-old woman was kidnapped by dozens of youths in broad daylight from her home in the Adibatla area of Ranga Reddy district in Telangana. According to reports, the parents of the victim alleged that a group of around 100 young men, all carrying arms, barged into their house and forcibly took their daughter Vaishali away.

According to reports, M Vaishali Reddy, a student pursuing dentistry was abducted just hours before her engagement. 

The family members further reported that they too were attacked by the miscreants and the police refused to help. 

The visuals from the incident show hoards of men rushing inside a house while some on the streets were vandalizing the car of the family. Further, the men can be seen beating up who appears to be the father of the girl. The parents had filed a police complaint but accused the police of not taking immediate action in the case.

However, after the video of the incident went viral, the Telangana police launched a search operation and rescued the woman after six hours. The police also arrested sixteen accused on charges of kidnapping, attempt to murder, trespass etc under various sections of IPC. However, Naveen, who has been named as the main accused by the victim’s parents is still on the run. The police are trying to identify and arrest the others as well, they said.

Rachakonda Additional CP, Sudheer Babu informed that the accused have been booked under serious offences including 307 of the IPC. He confirmed that it was purely a kidnapping case. After the victim was kidnapped she was beaten up and threatened by the accused, he added.

The woman’s family claimed that Naveen Reddy, who had allegedly been pressuring the woman to be married, was responsible for organising the mob and taking the woman hostage. The parents further said that Naveen has a franchise for a branded tea store and had put up a glass-walled cafe right opposite her home.

Naveen claims that he had married Vaishali, but later her parents got her mind changed, and she left him and joined dental college. However, Vaishali has denied this claim.

On Friday, Naveen went with workers from his tea stall, claiming his ‘wife’ refused to live with him, and he wanted to take her home. As she refused to go with him, he forcefully abducted her. After the girl was abducted by Naveen, her family vandalised and demolished his cafe near their house.

According to Ibrahimpatnam police, Vaishali is the daughter of a former army officer. She had met Naveen on a badminton court and the two had become close. Naveen is said to have even bought her a car from the profits his multilevel marketing company had generated.

Vaishali’s father reportedly told the media, “They had met while playing badminton, and were on friendly terms. He (Naveen) then proposed marriage through some mediators, but she rejected the proposal. We refused through the mediators. He had been complaining about it to others, questioning the rejection.”

Victim’s family accuses Telangana police of being apathetic to the case

Vaishali’s father claimed that the family had also reported to the Telangana police’s SHE squads division about his alleged harassment on the day of the immersion of the Ganesh idol. “He then sent politically influential persons as mediators. We still refused. He held a grudge over this, and has kidnapped her now,” the father said. He said there were around 20 relatives in the house when the incident happened.

The woman’s mother claimed that they had previously reported him to the police for allegedly harassing them and that she had rejected his proposal of marriage. They had been trying to arrange for their daughter’s marriage, she claimed. The family had planned to meet a potential groom on Friday, according to a neighbour.

The victim’s family staged a protest on the Nagarjuna Sagar highway, causing a traffic jam. They also broke down and set fire to the tea shop that is reportedly part of a chain owned by Naveen Reddy after Vaishali’s abduction. They raised slogans against Adibatla Inspector of Police Narender for his alleged negligence in the case.

Election analysis and one of the biggest mistakes we make: Understanding Delhi MCD, Gujarat and Himachal results as a culmination of events

The Elections are over. The elections will come again. The sweet taste of victory and the bitter taste of defeat will linger long over the participants, people and parties. Out of the two states that went to Elections, both having BJP as incumbent Government, one has been lost, and another, won by the BJP. A Municipality election in Delhi which coincided with the two bigger elections has also seen a change of power, from BJP to AAP. Where BJP has lost, the tendency has been to hide the details behind data. This could also be due to the laziness of the analysts or due to the complex manner in which human beings make decisions. It is because of this, we are often shocked, surprised and amused by the electoral results.

Most predictions are made on the basis of arithmetic, and most of the results are based on chemistry. Statistics hide failures and amplify successes. The results have their roots in the subtle and sublime, not in rhetoric and rallies. Rallies at best round off the loose ends left hanging by the do-gooders who work around the clock, around the intervening years with the people, in between the elections. Elections in a democracy are nothing but the conversations that the citizens hold with the men who they elect to rule over them. They also represent in their form and format the breakdown or continuance of the conversion in the period when elections were not around. 

In Gujarat, BJP came to power with a thumping majority. Out of 182 seats contested, BJP has got a whooping majority of 156 seats. Among the other parties that we know of, Arvind Kejriwal-led AAP got 5 seats, which is 2 seats more than the Independents, and 4 seats more than the Samajwadi party. Congress has turned out to be the second largest party, still with 17 seats, even after a vile, loud and acrimonious opposition to what they call Hindutva politics. The elections, as I contend, are nothing but a culmination of a five-year-long conversation that the political parties have with the electorate. It is easy to attribute the devastating decline of the Congress from 77 seats in the 2017 Gujarat elections to 17 in these elections to a lacklustre campaign of the senior leadership of the Party in Gujarat.

In the initial post-independence era, Congress enjoyed the unhindered and unquestioned access to the position of power, granted in gratitude by an indebted nation, fed on a structured narrative that it was Congress and Congress alone which gave us freedom. Later Congress was replaced by Nehru, and then by his descendants. We have walked far from that point, as India celebrated its 75th year of Freedom this year. With initial euphoria dead; an ill-managed economy, widespread corruption and power concentrated in the hands of few on account of their dynastic rights, based on the mythical role of Congress no longer holds good for the people. Now, when Gujarat questions you why was Sardar Patel given Bharat Ratna in 1991, you do not raise rancour over the Statue of Unity, you silently apologise for the oversight of your ancestors. When the Dalits of Gujarat ask you about why Dr Ambedkar got the Bharat Ratna only in 1990, by a non-Congress Government, you do not throw an Una at their face. You acknowledge the mistake. When you have 90 per cent of the voting majority in Gujarat from the Hindu faith, you do not insult Hindus, you do not attack Hindutva, and you accept the fears and insecurities of centuries which have seen the tyrants trample over the revered temple of Somnath. If Congress has to really unite Bharat, it cannot be done by vilifying the majority faith, by calling those who voted for Narendra Modi bigots. 

When it comes to Gujarat, there is a lot for Congress to apologise for. From Congress Councillor from Godhara lighting up the fire to inflaming 2002 riots in which around 750 Muslims and 250 Hindus died, by the refusal of Congress Chief Ministers of neighbouring states of MP (Digvijay Singh), Rajasthan (Ashok Gehlot) and Maharashtra (Vilasrao Deshmukh) (Reference: Narendra Modi: A Political Biography) ignoring the desperate call for help from the then CM of Gujarat, Narendra Modi. Rhetoric can work to fool people from outside the state, but you cannot speak of scorching summers to the people shivering under the cold and watching over a snowstorm which just passed them by. No Congress leadership has ever apologised to the people of Gujarat at large and to the Muslims of Gujarat who were used as expendable tools by Congress to get rid of the BJP in power in Gujarat.

Which community had more human losses is irrelevant since when a smaller and more aggressive community brings about violence on a majority community with a huge numerical advantage, eventual losses will be more on the side of a smaller community, even if they be the initiator of the violence. This was a case in the Direct Action Day violence in Kolkata as well. Much water has flown down Sabarmati since. The communities have aligned and reworked the ways of working with each other. The hatred has dissipated and is only visible in the eyes of politicians. As for the BJP, there are bridges built between the two communities. Congress, however, still thinks that polarization is the way to win. This explains that within Gujarat, a criminal thrashed by Police for trying to intrude into the Hindu religious affair of Navaratri Garba finds Congress siding with him, but a Kishan Bharwad who was murdered by Islamists finds no mention. To imagine that the people of Gujarat are not watching which side which political party leans toward is foolish. 

These are the undercurrents which, to my mind, were in play in Gujarat. As for the apathy of senior Congress leadership is concerned, there are two aspects to it. One, merely because your probability of winning is less, you do not abandon your team in the thick of a political war. Secondly, if the issue is about the state not falling in the way of Rahul Gandhi’s nationwide Congress Carnival, resembling a travelling circus of the past, the organisers need to answer why did the Bharat Jodo Yatra not start from Sabarmati Ashram in Gujarat and also if the Yatra is apolitical, why is it funded by a political party which in turn runs of the contribution of masses who contribute to resurrect the Congress as a political party. The isolation of the Congress from the people is so pronounced that as late as the 12th of November, 2022, AICC Gujarat in-Charge, Raghu Sharma claimed that the results will surprise all and we will form a Government…We will get more than 125 seats. (‘Congress Plans 25 Mega Rallies, to bring out Big Guns for Mission Gujarat, India Today: 12th of November, 2022, Supriya Bharadwaj). As things stand post-elections, Congress risks losing the status of Party of Opposition in the Gujarat Assembly with one seat lesser than the minimum 18 seats needed (10% of total seats).

In all fairness, one can only blame the local Congress leadership for trying to keep up the pretence in the face of abject alienation by the merry-making senior leadership aided by the consultation of the unelected and the unelectable gang comprising of Jairam Ramesh, Supriya Shrinate, Kanhaiya Kumar among the key strategists of Rahul Gandhi. The rally keeps attacking national heroes and Hindus on Social Media and Main Stream Media, taking up petty fights with the private person like the maker of the film ‘Kashmir Files’ on the Hindu Exodus from the valley of Kashmir in face of the terror of Islamist terrorists, thereby sending a message to 90% of the electorate in Gujarat and to 80% electorate nationally, that they do not care about the Hindus. Their antipathy to the reconstruction of places of Hindu pilgrimages is too visible to the people of Gujarat where the annual pilgrimage, calledPravaas, is a routine way of Gujarati life. 

As for AAP, a party more and more being run by a megalomaniac Arvind Kejriwal as a personal fiefdom with no qualms about lying in public space. It is not that the politicians have not been charged before the arrival of Kejriwal for being economical and inventive with facts (Sharad Pawar, on record, acknowledged inventing a fake Bomb blast which never happened in a Muslim area to secularise Mumbai Bomb Blast) but they did it with hesitation and enough cover. Kejriwal has brought an embarrassing level of brazenness into the space of Political lying. The constant bribes he passes on the media in form of advertisements from Delhi state funds, ensures that no one ever holds him to his word. Just as he predicted a sure-shot victory in Goa, in Uttarakhand, in UP, in all the places where he lost his deposit in the majority of the contested seats, he claimed thus in Gujarat. His party got 5 seats in the elections. The blatant media channels, however, hailed this as a great victory for AAP in Gujarat, the sober ones like ToI called it a ‘mixed result’ hailing it as a success in a ‘debut attempt’. The fact is that this was not a debut attempt for Kejriwal, it was his second foray into Gujarat.

In the 2017 election, AAP contested 30 seats in Gujarat and lost deposits in almost all. Most AAP candidates got votes in two digits (a surprise given the large joint families in Gujarat), and the best performer was Arjunbhai Rathva who got 4500 votes in Chhota Udaipur. This time again Kejriwal continued with his manufactured lies at an industrial scale, without any pangs of guilt or human hesitation. The way Kejriwal has perfected the art of lying compares itself well with earlier senior political leaders in the words of Oscar Wilde in The Decay of Lying when he writes – They (earlier politicians in our case) never rise beyond the level of misrepresentation, and actually condescend to prove, to discuss, to argue. How different from the temper of a true liar, with his frank, fearless statements, his superb irresponsibility, his healthy, natural disdain of proof of any kind! How perfectly Arvind Kejriwal fits the description.

His devastating loss has not wisened him. If anything, they have turned a professional liar into a hardened one. Now he claimed that AAP has become the party with the fastest journey to being a national party in Indian history. The fact is out of the ten political parties that became national after their formation post-independence, with a decade behind it, AAP has only TMC and BSP which took more than ten years to turn national. NCP became National in less than one year and BJP within Four Years. Gujaratis are straightforward people, known for excellent business ethics. If anything, this five-seat win of Kejriwal is nothing but a fluke, in the face of a sea of lies, he unleashed on the state. Claiming to bring in clean politics, he threw the highest number of criminals in the fray, as against both BJP and Congress. 

The parties which failed Gujarat, failed because they did not understand Gujarat. They spoke to the people of Gujarat with visible disdain. They claimed that the growth in Gujarat was a jobless growth and promised to bring Delhi or Rajasthan Model. The fact remains that against Gujarat’s unemployment rate of 1.72%, Delhi under Kejriwal stood at 12.74% and Rajasthan under Congress Government was at 30.72%. The narrative both the parties in contention built was totally incongruent with the realities of Gujarat and instead of aligning with the aspirations of the electorate, they tried to school the electorate, tried to belittle their intelligence. The infrastructure which they claimed was non-existent, was visible to the people. They lied and lied, and abused those who contradicted their lies. You cannot hold a proper conversation with people you hold in great disdain. Congress looked at the people of Gujarat with disdain and suffered for that. 

This would also explain the big failure of BJP in Himachal and the Municipality elections of Delhi. While BJP was not totally wiped out by AAP as was claimed by Kejriwal, it was reduced to a minority position with 105 wards victory out of 250 wards. Congress, on the other hand, was totally decimated. The data play can bring some comfort to BJP in Delhi, as their vote percentage has risen by 3% to 39%. The fact remains that the number of BJP Councillors in the new MCD is less than the halfway mark where they held an overwhelming majority. We can find ways to offer solace to Delhi BJP but the fact remains that it suffered the same challenge which the congress faced in Gujarat. The communication with the voters snapped.

When Citizens suffered at the blocked Delhi border, with the city held captive, except a lone voice of Kapil Mishra, the state capitulated. When Saffron was attacked by AAP, when the Islamist agenda was raised by the fanatics on the back of a foreign-funded CAA protest culminating in anti-Hindu riots, BJP at large was missing from the scene. Kapil Mishra was there to support the riot victims but mostly as an individual. When Nupur Sharma was thrown under the bus by the BJP leadership to appease a far-flung Muslim dictatorship, people might have forgiven them, but when Tablighi Jamat, declared a terror organisation even by the Islamic state of Saudi Arabia for their fanatic views, was restored after blatantly adding to Covid spread across India, was forgiven, Delhi noticed dreadfully.

When the Jahangirpuri riot culprit’s illegal house came to the note of people, they also noticed how this must have come up due to negligence and corruption of the BJP-ruled MCD. Illegality encouraged and ignored by the conniving state not only has an economic impact, but it also impacts the lives of law-abiding citizens. Why would Delhi citizens not question how under the nose of MCD, AAP Councillor Tahir Hussain created a riot fortress? BJP needs to evaluate and answer these questions. When Kishan Bharwad was murdered by Muslim fanatics in Gujarat, HM of Gujarat, Harsh Sanghvi visited the family of the victim. When Heera Gujarati was murdered in Delhi when Dilbar Negi was burned alive and Rahul Rajput was stabbed in Delhi, did you see senior BJP functionaries visit the families?

When recently Nitish was murdered in Delhi, did the BJP Delhi leader organise a candlelight vigil in Central Delhi, while the Delhi Police like earlier tried to whitewash the case? When the Hindu temple at Hauz Qazi was desecrated by the local fanatics, the Delhi Police under the BJP acted against the protesting Hindus. These things write themselves up on the minds of Hindus orphaned by political parties in the rush of appeasement. If these sentiments play up against Congress, it is totally impossible that they won’t be against the BJP.

Gujarat leaders do not make great speakers in Hindi for national channels, but they are sincere and committed to their ideology, the ideology with which Jan Sangh was founded. I do not know much about Himachal, but I know that BJP there was speaking about Central projects and initiatives. It has forgotten how to speak in the local dialect. Learn to converse with people, then only the Chanakya arithmetics will fall in place. If I was a friend of Heera Gujarati, I will not vote for someone who did not stand with him merely because he made a stellar speech in the election campaign. Lazy analysts will continue to fool politicians but the fact is that the only counter to BJP is more BJP. When BJP gets 50% votes in India, remember, in 2024, you cannot win by calling those 50% people fanatics, hate mongers and bigots. If you think that, there is something wrong with your mind and strategy both. The elections are a moment of learning for both those who win and those who lose.

Ibrahim Hooper of CAIR blames ‘Hindutva’ and ‘Islamophobia’ in India after a Muslim mob beats up a Muslim couple for watching Kantara

On 9th December 2022, Ibrahim Hooper from Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) took to his Twitter account to complain about ‘Hindutva’ and ‘Islamophobia’ in India after a Muslim mob beat up a Muslim couple. Hooper shared news from the Free Press Journal with a caption that suggested Muslims in India are under threat from Hindus.

The news was about a Muslim couple in Karnataka getting beaten by a mob for watching the Kannada blockbuster film Kantara. Ibrahim Hooper claimed in his tweet that Hindus beat this Muslim couple while in reality, it was a mob of Muslims that attacked this couple for watching Kantara.

Ibrahim Cooper wrote in his tweet, “A Muslim couple who had gone to watch the Kannada language film Kantara was assaulted by a mob, News18 reported. Islamophobia in India. Hindutva. BJP fails in India.” He also tagged the Twitter handles of Hindus for Human Rights and Indian American Muslim Council in his tweet. It is notable that Hindus for Human Rights and Indian American Muslim Council are known for their anti-India, anti-Hindu agenda, just like Council on American Islamic Relations.

While the news report shared by the National Communications Director of the CAIR did not mention specific information about the attackers, it is now well established that the mob of assaulters was that of Muslims.

Two young students, Mohammed Imtiyaz (20) and his 18-year-old girlfriend, both from the same community, were allegedly beaten in front of a movie theatre in Sullia, Dakshina Kannada district, Karnataka, by a group of Muslim men. The young couple was there to watch the blockbuster ‘Kantara’.

Imtiyaz and his friend later filed a complaint with Sullia police, naming the perpetrators of the assault. Abdul Hameed, Ashraf, Sadique, Jabeer Jattipalla, and Siddique Borugudde have been named as the suspects. According to the complaint, they allegedly threatened the young couple with death, but Ibrahim Hooper conveniently picked the news to spread the lie that Hindus attacked the Muslim couple.

CAIR, IAMC, and Hindus for Human Rights are America-based Islamist outfits that keep peddling anti-Hindu and anti-India agendas through their activities. Recently, these outfits cried foul after a mobile billboard truck displayed images of the 26/11 terror attack in New Jersey. On the 14th anniversary of the dastardly attack on the Indian financial capital Mumbai, Indian Americans took out demonstrations outside the Pakistan Community center in New Jersey.

CAIR took offense at the display of the names of the LeT terrorists (referred to as ‘suspects’ in the article) and scenes from the deadly terror attack. CAIR called it a deliberate and well-coordinated move giving a message of hate.

CAIR and its anti-India propaganda

CAIR is an Islamist group that has spoken against India and Hindus on several occasions. It is noteworthy that CAIR has links with the terrorist organization Hamas. The organization has been vehemently pushing Hinduphobia and anti-Hindu propaganda in India. Previously, CAIR extended support for the extremely Hinduphobic ‘Dismantling Global Hindutva‘ conference.

In January 2022, CAIR launched Hinduphobic propaganda based on a report by alleged journalist Rana Ayyub. In a press release, CAIR demanded the movie theatres not to release Sooryavanshi, a Hindi movie. In the press release, CAIR alleged the movie spreads “disgusting and dangerous” anti-Muslim propaganda inspired by the fascist Hindutva movement.” The organization has also called for the release of 49-year-old Pakistani terrorist Aafia Siddiqui, who is currently serving 86 years in prison for attacking US Army and FBI personnel in Afghanistan.

Electricity and Gas shortages grip Pakistan as several major cities run out of gas ahead of the harsh winter season

0

Gas shortage is a significant issue that grips Pakistan every year in winter due to increased prices of wood and coal as well as the shortage. Moreover, compared to last year, wood and coal prices have doubled, media reports said.

According to numerous media reports, gas is no longer available in a number of cities in Sindh, Punjab, and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. As a result of the gas load shedding, residents in Karachi, Lahore, Hyderabad, Multan, Peshawar, and Rawalpindi are concerned, and demand for LPG and firewood has also surged. 

Despite doubling prices of Wood and coal, the plan to supply LPG to domestic consumers to meet their fuel needs is also ineffective. According to local media, Sindh produces about 62 per cent of gas in the country and in return gets only 38 per cent of gas for Sindh. 

On the other hand, gas production in Punjab is only 3 per cent but Punjab gets 52 per cent of gas. In Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, gas production is 15 per cent and its consumption is only 7 per cent, in Balochistan, gas production is 12 per cent and consumption is only 2 per cent.

Meanwhile, civilians in Gharibabad in Qalat are also suffering from the problems of electricity and gas for a long time; load shedding, tripping, low voltage, and irregular supply of Sui gas field, and that too for a very short time.

In November, the people complained to the authorities but the situation did not change. So, the frustrated people were forced to protest, reported Pak vernacular media, Intekhab Daily. They came out on the roads and women and children closed the national highway. The traffic flow on the Karachi-Quetta was badly disrupted.

A transformer was burnt in Gharibabad last month and since then they are suffering from electricity problems because the transformer is neither repaired nor replaced so far, reported the vernacular media. 

(This news report is published from a syndicated feed. Except for the headline, the content has not been written or edited by OpIndia staff)

Donald Trump thanks Elon Musk for releasing the ‘Twitter Files’ and exposing the FBI’s interference in elections: Here is what happened

Hours after the third tranche of ‘Twitter Files’ was released to the public, former US President Donald Trump thanked Elon Musk for allegedly exposing how the FBI and the Justice Department colluded with Twitter officials to manipulate the 2020 US Presidential elections.

While taking to Truth Social on Friday (December 9, US local time), Trump said, “ELON: The Twitter releases are a revelation in that they show, in a very powerful fashion, the FBI and “Justice” illegally colluding, proving conclusively, in one more very powerful way, that the 2020 Presidential Election was Rigged & Stolen.”

“What everyone is REALLY waiting to see, however, is the Twitter information and thought process leading up to the time of the so-called “Election,” and ultimately the “Deplatforming” of the President of the United States. Big moment in history. Thank you!” he further added.

It must be mentioned that Truth Social is an alternate social media platform, created by Trump Media & Technology Group, after the former US President was de-platformed from Twitter in the wake of the US Capitol riots of January 6, 2021.

While responding to his message on Twitter, Musk informed that transcripts of more internal communications will be released in the coming days. Last month, Elon Musk reinstated the Twitter account of Donald Trump.

Revelations made by Twitter Files 3.0

On Friday (December 9, US local time), the third tranche of confidential conversations between top Twitter executives was released on the micro-blogging platform. 

Journalist Matt Taibbi pointed out that the ‘intellectual framework’ to de-platform former US President Donald Trump was laid in the months preceding the January 6 incident in Washington.

“Before J6, Twitter was a unique mix of automated, rules-based enforcement, and more subjective moderation by senior executives,” he emphasised. While referring to the ‘Twitter Files 2.0‘, he said that tactics to manipulate tweet visibility were adopted to censor the likes of Donald Trump.

The first part of the ‘Twitter Files 3.0’ revealed that the senior executives of Twitter Inc. were in constant touch with federal agencies ahead of the 2020 US Presidential elections.

Matt Taibbi informed that they began enforcing rules arbitrarily and using pretexts to justify their actions. Following the US Capitol riots, the meetings between top Twitter employees and federal agencies intensified.

Matt Taibbi unearthed how the mindset of top Twitter executives evolved between late 2020 and early 2021. He informed that a channel titled ‘us2020_xfn_enforcement’ was created to discuss the censorship of high-profile accounts (also called Very Important Tweeters) in the context of US elections.

The first part of ‘Twitter Files 3.0’ exposed how the likes of Vijaya Gadde (former Head of Legal, Policy, and Trust at Twitter) and Yoel Roth (former Global Head of Trust & Safety) were making decisions based on whims and fancies.

“The latter group were a high-speed Supreme Court of moderation, issuing content rulings on the fly, often in minutes and based on guesses, gut calls, even Google searches, even in cases involving the President,” journalist Matt Taibbi noted.

He also added that the duo was “clearly liaising with federal enforcement and intelligence agencies about moderation of election-related content”.

The third tranche of ‘Twitter Files’ revealed how the Federal Bureau of Investigation routinely sent tweets, posted by Republican candidates, to the moderation team for expunction.

The FBI alleged that a tweet by John Basham, a Republican and former Councilor, made false allegations about 20-25% of mail ballots being rejected due to errors.

“Twitter cited Politifact to say the first story was “proven to be false”, then noted the second was already deemed “no vio on numerous occasions,” Matt Taibbi noted. It thus showed how Twitter executives readily agreed to FBI diktats and how the federal agency intervened in political affairs.

UP cop shares posts supporting illegal conversion and hateful speeches of fugitive Zakir Naik, deletes Facebook account later

On Friday, December 9, several Twitter users shared screenshots of some Facebook posts from Police Constable Mushir Khan, posted in the Lalitpur area of Uttar Pradesh. In the Facebook screenshots that have now gone viral on social media, the officer shared multiple posts mocking Hindus and their faith, shared posts in favour of illegal religious conversions, and also in support of Indian fugitive extremist ‘preacher’ Dr Zakir Naik. The constable is said to be posted in the district’s women’s police station in Lalitpur, Uttar Pradesh.

The screenshots of Mushir Khan’s hateful Facebook posts were first shared by Bajrang Muni Udasin, the Mahant of a temple in Sitapur. The Mahant shared 4 pictures. One was a screenshot of a snippet of a video of the Islamist preacher Zakir Naik that was posted by a Facebook group ‘Dr Zakir Naik Ke Chahne Walon Group’. The UP cop had shared this from his Facebook account named ‘Mushir Khan Mushir Khan’ on November 25.

The name of the admin of this group ‘Dr Zakir Naik Ke Chahne Walon Group’ is some Aamir Khan. About 4 lakh 15 thousand members are connected with the group, one of them being the UP constable Mushir Khan.

Notably, in this Zakir Naik supporters group, numerous videos of the fugitive are frequently posted among many other radical Islamic religious topics. According to his Facebook profile, group administrator Aamir Khan is a native of Gopalganj, Bihar, although he presently resides in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. On the videos he shares, he regularly gets thousands of likes and comments. Constable Musheer and other group members frequently share Zakir Naik’s hateful speeches shared from this account.

Khan’s other posts that went viral were the ones that mocked Kalpana Chawla, the first woman of Indian origin to go to space. He had shared a post originally posted by some ‘NA News’, that said that the astronaut converted to Islam after encountering ‘Allah in space’.

In another post, Khan shared two pictures of Dipika Chikhlia Topiwala, the actress known for playing Devi Sita in Ramanand Sagar’s television series Ramayan. One was in the attire of Goddess Sita, which she donned in the serial, and a photoshopped one of her in a burqa. The constable implied that the actress had converted to Islam.

In his tweet, Mahant Bajrang Muni Udasin voiced his concern that Constable Mushir may be affiliated with a terrorist network. He stated that he will urge the NIA to look into the constable’s connections. The Lalitpur police responded to the Mahant’s tweet saying that they have started probing the issue and would take appropriate action on the same.

Notably, after the Uttar Pradesh constable was called out for sharing hateful and communally sensitive posts and the Lalitpur police’s response, Mushir Khan deleted his Facebook account.

Zakir Naik’s Islamist preachings and their violent consequences

Zakir Naik has been avoiding Indian authorities ever since his name started cropping up in terror-related cases. In 2016, terrorists involved in the Dhaka blast case admitted that they were influenced by the preacher’s speeches.

In 2019, Zakir was banned from giving speeches in Malaysia after he made racist comments against Hindus and Chinese Malaysians. He was interrogated for hours in connection to the same.

Zakir Naik is wanted in India in cases involving money laundering. The government of India had taken his channel, Peace TV, off the air for peddling hate propaganda.

Journalism school linked to The Hindu’s N Ram invites man convicted in Rajiv Gandhi assassination case to deliver a lecture, try to paint him innocent

Asian College of Journalism, one of the premier institutions for journalism has invited AG Perarivalan, convicted in the assassination of former Prime Minister of India Rajiv Gandhi, for a guest lecture. Asian College of Journalism (ACJ) based in Chennai comes under the aegis of the Media Development Foundation headed by journalist Sashi Kumar. The Hindu’s N. Ram is also a founding trustee of the Media Development Foundation.

The guest lecture is organised by Project 39A, which is an initiative of the National Law University Delhi. Project 39A also has a chapter at ACJ and the lecture by the convicted criminal will be held at the ACJ venue.

According to the Project 39A website, the lecture is supposed to be held on the 17th of December at the MS Subbulakshmi auditorium at the Asian College of Journalism.

While Project 39A and the ACJ have tried their best to paint the convicted man as an innocent man hounded by the state, several individuals recognised the dangers of platforming and humanising the assassin of Rajiv Gandhi, and took to Twitter to condemn the guest lecture.

Political analyst Sumanth Raman expressed shock at the decision by ACJ to host AG Perarivalan.

Others said that perhaps they have served their time and must be released, however, painting them as innocent does no good to the society.

The lecture of Perarivalan has been titled “The denial of justice and a quest unfinished”, which in itself indicates the institution’s intention of painting the criminal as an innocent victim of the Indian state. However, that is not all. The initiative by NLU Delhi, in collaboration with ACJ, has gone a step ahead and claimed that the Indian judiciary and the system in general dehumanised Perarivalan. They also claim that his release was ordered after “grave doubts were cast on his role in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination”.

Who is AG Perarivalan and how are Project35 and ACJ wrong about him being “innocent”

50-year-old A G Perarivalan, alias Arivu, is the son of Tamil poet Kuyildasan. When he was a teenager, he was a sympathiser of LTTE and on the evening of 21st May 1991, when former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi was assassinated at a rally in Sriperumbudur, Tamil Nadu, he was 19 years old.

On the 11th of June 1991, Perarivalan was arrested for his role in the assassination. He was convicted because it was proven that he bought the two nine-volt batteries used in the bomb belt and handed them over to LTTE chief Sivarasan, the mastermind of the operation. Perarivalan at that time had confessed to his crime under TADA (a law that has now been discontinued). “Moreover, I bought two nine-volt battery cells (Golden Power) and gave them to Sivarasan. He used only these to make the bomb explode”, his confession had read. However, the CBI officer who had recorded his statement later claimed in a documentary that he had tampered with the statement and added his interpretation to it, whereas, Perarivalan had claimed that he had no knowledge that the batteries would be used to assassinate Rajiv Gandhi.

Tamil documentary ‘Uyirvali – Sakkiyadikkum Satham‘ had the CBI officer, Thiagarajan’s, “confession” about the lapse in recording the statement and how Perarivalan was ‘innocent’ according to him. “What is pricking me is that at that time Arivu (Perarivalan) told me that he didn’t know why he was being asked to buy them (the batteries) and what they will do with them. He told me that he didn’t know about it at all. But while writing the confession statement I omitted the part where he said he didn’t know about it at all. The investigation was progressing then but I didn’t write that particular statement.” he says in the documentary.

It is pertinent to note that the confession of the convicted criminal was upheld by the Supreme Court.

It is this statement by the CBI officer, however, that has been used repeatedly to claim that Perarivalan is “innocent”, however, what is often excluded is the fact that the CBI officer, in this case, has a questionable past, that makes his statement shrouded in doubt. In the sister Abhaya case, who was found dead in a well at the St Pius X Convent in Kottayam, Kerala on March 27, 1992, Thiagarajan had reportedly played a pivotal role in trying to skirt justice being served. He had reportedly pressurised his subordinate Varghese P Thomas to conclude that Sister Abhaya committed suicide and was not murdered. Under his pressure, The crime branch had recorded that Abhaya had committed suicide as she got only 7 marks out of 100 in her first-year pre-degree examination. However, it was later established that she was murdered and Father Thomas Kottoor and Sister Sephy were convicted in the case.

In 1998, AG Perarivalan was sentenced to death by a TADA court. While ACJ wants to convince people that Perarivalan is “innocent”, a timeline of his case summarily proves that his conviction was unheld several times and his release was also a product of technicality, rather than his innocence being proven.

  1. After the TADA court awarded the death penalty to Perarivalan and 25 others in January 1998, in May 1999, Supreme Court upheld the death penalty.
  2. In October 1999, Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed.
  3. In October itself, a clemency petition was filed which was subsequently rejected by the Tamil Nadu Governor.
  4. In April 2000, Tamil Nadu Cabinet headed by Chief Minister M Karunanidhi recommends the Governor of the state commute the death sentence awarded to Nalini. Congress President Sonia Gandhi also appealed to the President of India to commute her death sentence. This was accepted by the Governor. It was only days later that the Governor forwarded the mercy petition of Santhan, Murugan, and Perarivalan to the President of India. This mercy petition was rejected in August 2011.
  5. On 30th August 2011, Tamil Nadu CM Jayalalitha moved a resolution in the assembly demanding that the death sentence of Santhan, Murugan and Perarivalan be commuted to life imprisonment. On the very same day, the Madras HC stayed the execution of the three and the case was sent to the Supreme Court.
  6. On 18th February 2014, the Supreme Court commuted the death sentence of the convicts to life imprisonment. This decision by the Supreme Court came because the President had taken 11 years to decide on the clemency petition, rejecting his petition only in 2011. “The fact that no time limit is prescribed to the President/Governor for disposal of the mercy petition should compel the government to work in a more systematised manner to repose the confidence of the people in the institution of democracy…” Justice Sathasivam had noted. It is pertinent to note here that when the sentence was reduced, there was no judgement on the conviction of the accused. They were still convicted, however, it was because of the technicality of delay in deciding the mercy petition that the Supreme Court decided to change the death sentence to life imprisonment.
  7. A day later, on the 19th of February 2014, politics took over and the Tamil Nadu cabinet headed by Chief Minister J Jayalalithaa decides to release all seven convicts in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.
  8. A day later, on the 20th of February 2014, the Congress government approached the Supreme Court against the release of convicts, including Perarivalan.
  9. In December 2015, Periravalan submits a mercy petition yet again to the TN governor and moves Supreme Court seeking release.
  10. In 2017, the Tamil Nadu government grants parole to Perarivalan.
  11. in 2018, the Supreme Court decides that the Governor has the right to decide on the mercy petition filed by the convict.
  12. On September 9th 2018, Tamil Nadu Cabinet headed by Edappadi K Palaniswami recommended the release of all seven convicts and it was in 2021 that the Supreme Court asked the central government to take a decision within 3 months on the TN government’s decision to release the convicts.
  13. In February 2021, the central government went back to the Supreme Court saying that they believed that instead of the TN govt, the President of India was the right authority to decide on the remission of the convicted.
  14. Till 2021, the DMK government kept extending the parole granted to Perarivalan.
  15. On 15th March 2022, Perarivalan walked out of jail on bail for the first time. After the Supreme Court granted him bail, he requested the Vellore Superintendent of Police to cancel his parole and take him to prison so he can walk out of there on bail. Pertinently, the court had only observed that he had been granted parole twice, without complaint, and that he had served a long sentence already, and therefore was entitled to bail. He was still convicted. A bench presided by Justice L Nageswara Rao said “Since he has already undergone sentence for more than 30 years, we are of the considered view that he is entitled to bail in spite of the vehement opposition by Additional Solicitor General K M Nataraj”.
  16. On 18th May 2022, the Supreme Court ordered the release of Perarivalan exercising its special powers. “Taking into account the Appellant’s prolonged period of incarceration, his satisfactory conduct in jail as well as during parole, chronic ailments from his medical records, his educational qualifications acquired during incarceration and the pendency of his petition under Article 161 for two and a half years after the recommendation of the State Cabinet, we do not consider it fit to remand the matter for the Governor’s consideration. In the exercise of our power under Article 142 26 | P a g e of the Constitution, we direct that the Appellant is deemed to have served the sentence in connection with Crime No. 329 of 1991. The Appellant, who is already on bail, is set at liberty forthwith. His bail bonds are cancelled“, the court had said. The Supreme Court had earlier said that the Tamil Nadu governor was bound by the decision of the state cabinet on the release of Perarivalan, and disapproved of his action, sending the mercy plea to the President saying it cannot shut eyes to something against the Constitution. The top court had refused to agree with the Centre’s suggestion that the court should wait till the President decides on the issue. It had told the Centre that the governor was bound by the aid and advice given by the Tamil Nadu Council of Ministers under Article 161 of the Constitution while directing the Centre to submit its response. It is therefore evident that the release of Perarivalan was a product of the Tamil Nadu government’s politics and not his innocence.

Given the chronology, for ACJ and Project 39A to claim that Perarivalan was “innocent” and a product of state persecution is absurd. It not only whitewashes a convicted criminal who was a part of the plot to assassinate but also justifies the assassination of the former Prime Minister of India, Rajiv Gandhi, which must be seen as an act of terrorism and war in itself.

ACJ (Asian College of Journalism) and its links – including that to The Hindu’s N Ram

Asian College of Journalism is considered one of the leading institutions in the field. According to its website, the college is run by Media Development Foundation.

The website says:

The Media Development Foundation, a not-for-profit public trust, was established in 1999 to foster journalism as an independent, investigative, socially responsible, and ethical profession. It aims to promote excellence in the field through education, training, and media-related research. It seeks to equip aspiring modern journalists with the capabilities to achieve world-class standards in the profession. It is committed to promoting diversity and broadening access to journalism by offering educational and training opportunities to all groups in society, including those who are severely underrepresented in the journalistic profession.

The Trustees of the Foundation are Sashi Kumar (Chairman), journalist, TV anchor, filmmaker and Chairman, Asiaville Interactive; N. Ram, Director, The Hindu Publishing Group; C. P. Chandrasekhar, former Professor of Economics, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi and columnist; Radhika Menon, Managing Editor of Tulika Publishers; and N. Murali, Chairman, Kasturi and Sons Limited.

In pursuit of its goal, in 2000 the Foundation took over, by agreement with the parent B. D. Goenka Foundation, the Asian College of Journalism, which had been functioning successfully for six years in Bangalore. The College was moved to Chennai and its course content was restructured and broadened. The first class graduated in June 2001.

N Ram of The Hindu is the founding trustee of the Media Development Foundation, which owns and runs ACJ, which is now hosting a criminal.

It is pertinent to note that N Ram had actively worked in trying to derail the fighter jet deal by publishing fake news on The Hindu. During the run-up to 2019 general elections, he had published cropped and incomplete pictures of documents in The Hindu to allege government wrongdoing in the Rafale deal – a deal that was exonerated by the Supreme Court later. The Hindu under N Ram has also been furthering the Chinese Community Party’s propaganda for a long time, as documented by OpIndia. In fact, an article in The Hoot explains how The Hindu had to balance its criticism of LTTE and also be sympathetic towards the terror organisation because a substantial part of its reader base held sympathies for the LTTE. It is therefore no surprise that N Ram is today endorsing giving a platform to a criminal convicted of helping in the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi.

The Chairman of Media Development Foundation Shashi Kumar, on the other hand, is also someone who clearly harbours sentiments towards the Left. He had recently approached the court against sedition laws. The arrest of PFI footsoldiers like Siddique Kappan and other anti-national elements formed the basis of his petition.

While supporting Leftists and Islamic extremists, Shashi Kumar had also filed a petition against “hate speech” by Hindus. Hate speech in media should not be allowed to be disguised as free speech or religious freedom by majoritarian forces, veteran journalist Sashi Kumar said in an intervention application in the Supreme Court. While demanding freedom for anti-India forces like Disha Ravi and Siddique Kappan, he argued in favour of 153A, mainly because speech offends the sensibilities of Islamists.

“It is an irony that instances of publications and telecasts which amount to an offence under Section 153A of Indian Penal Code [of creating communal disharmony and hatred between communities or groups] are sought to be protected under Article 19 (1)(a) of the Constitution by the majoritarian forces. When the constitutional scheme in this regard is clear, there is no ambiguity warranting legislation”, the intervention application said. The intervention application was filed in the case against Sudarshan News after it aired a show on UPSC Jihad.

With all of this, it is no surprise that a convict would find a place at ACJ. As far as Project 39A is concerned, they are active advocates against the death penalty even intellectualising the death penalty awarded in cases of human sacrifice. Only three weeks ago, Project 39A was conferred the award “for its unwavering commitment and achievements in the fight for abolition” of the death penalty. 

With the strong left bias of ACJ, its founding trustee, its chairman and even Project 39A, it is unsurprising that they would want to paint a convicted criminal as an innocent hounded by the Indian state.

Is Ashok Swain banned from entering India after Modi govt cancelled his OCI card? Here is what he is claiming, the case in HC and what it means

Ashok Swain, a professor at Uppsala University in Sweden, who is known for his anti-India and anti-Hindu views, has approached the Delhi High Court challenging the union government’s decision to cancel his Overseas Citizenship of India (OCI) card. Swain has argued that his OCI card has been cancelled arbitrarily, and claims that this cancellation violates his fundamental right to free movement and other rights.

Responding to the petition, the High Court has issued a notice to the Union Home Ministry and Embassy of India to Sweden and Latvia, asking them to submit a response within 4 weeks. Ashok Swain lives in Sweden and his OCI card was cancelled by the Indian embassy to Sweden and Latvia. The matter has been listed for hearing on February 7.

According to the petition, Ashok Swain was issued an OCI card in January 2020, but in October in the same year, he received a show-cause notice from the Indian Embassy barring the OCI card, saying that he was indulging in inflammatory speeches and anti-India activities. He responded to the notice denying the allegations in November 2020. He also claims that no specific incidents of his anti-India activities were mentioned in the notice

The petition further states on February 8 this year, his OCI card was cancelled by the Embassy of India to Sweden and Latvia, under Section 7D(e) of the Citizenship Act, 1955.

What Ashok Swain claims

After that, he moved the Delhi High Court challenging the cancellation, and argued that he was being ‘witch hunted’ by the Modi government and that his OCI card had been cancelled arbitrarily. Responding to the allegation of inflammatory speeches and Anti-India activities, he said that as a scholar, it is his job to criticise governments. He claimed that he only criticises the Modi government and its policies, and therefore he can’t be held guilty of indulging in anti-India activities under Section 7D(e) of the Citizenship Act, 1955.

Ashok Swain also claimed that the action violates his fundamental right to free movement and other rights accorded to him by virtue of his OCI status. He also said in the plea that he has an ailing mother of about 77 years old in India who is suffering from various medical ailments, and he has to visit her urgently. But as the OCI card is cancelled, he can’t travel to India to meet his mother, he claimed.

Several other people also claimed on social media that Ashok Swain has been banned from entering India.

What is OCI card and what does its cancellation mean?

OCI card is issued to people of Indian origin and their spouses who are citizens of other countries, allowing them to live in India for an indefinite period of time. People with having OCI cards do not have to obtain visas to travel to India, they can travel using the OCI card and their foreign passport, and therefore it allows them hassle-free entry into the country.

The OCI card does not grant Indian citizenship, voting rights, right to contest elections or hold public office to its holders. Therefore, an OCI card is more like a permanent visa to India with a lifetime residence permit, without requiring a visa stamp on the passport. The government of India holds the right to cancel OCI cards granted to any person.

When an OCI card is cancelled, the holder of that card loses the right to visa-free entry into India and the right to reside in India indefinitely. But, importantly, it does not bar that person from entering India like Ashok Swain is suggesting. After the OCI card is cancelled, he is now a normal person of Indian origin, and there is no ban on his entry into India.

Cancellation of OCI card means he can’t enter India without a visa, but he can obtain a visa and travel to India, just like any foreigner, including Indian foreigners who have not obtained the card. After entering India, Ashok Swain can stay for the time period stipulated in the visa.

Therefore, the claim that the cancellation of the OCI card violates his fundamental right to free movement and other rights is completely false and wrong. The Cancellation of the OCI card does not violate any fundamental right, because it is a privilege granted to foreigners of Indian origin by the Indian government, and it is not a fundamental right or any other right. It is important to note that the OCI card is a privilege, it is not a right.

Only the convenience of visa-free travel has been taken away, and there is absolutely no bar on his free movement in India just because his OCI card has been scrapped. Therefore, it is wrong to claim that he can’t visit his ailing mother because he does not have the OCI card. He can just get a visa to India and visit his mother, there is no ban on that.

It is important that the OCI card facility was introduced only in 2005, and people of Indian origin were travelling to India using regular visas before that. Moreover, Ashok Swain himself said that he was issued the card only in January 2020, and it was barred after 10 months.

According to the reports, Ashok Swain is living in Sweden for the last 32 years after obtaining his PhD from JNU in 1991. This means, from the time he surrendered his Indian citizenship till January 2020, he was visiting India without an OCI card, using the regular visa route. Therefore, the claim that he can’t visit India for cancellation of the OCI card issued just two years ago is completely false and baseless.

Ashok Swain and anti-India activities

Ashok Swain says that he only criticises the government and does not make anti-India comments, that claim is completely wrong, and he is regularly caught spreading anti-India hatred and sharing fake news that paints India as an anti-Muslim country.

Just a couple of days ago, he shared a video claiming that a man was beaten for being Muslim. Sharing a video, he tweeted, “Another day, another lynching! One more Muslim man being lynched in Maharashtra, India.” While the man survived, he falsely claimed that it was a lynching, however, he corrected this in a subsequent tweet. And the man was not beaten for being Muslim, he was beaten on the suspicion of being a thief.

Ashok Swain has shared similar fake claims earlier also, labelling random acts as anti-Muslim acts. Earlier in 2019, he had claimed that a Muslim boy was set on fire for not chanting Jai Shri Ram, when the fact is that the boy had set himself on fire in a dargah.

In India people regularly take the law into their hands after catching a thief, pick-pocketer etc, and most times the mob does not even know the religion and other identities of such people. But if such culprits happen to be Muslim, people like Ashok Swain claim they are attacked for being Muslim. The only reason to do this is to paint India as an anti-Muslim country. Therefore, it is definitely an anti-India activity.

Ashok Swain also wanted ‘Muslim Lives Matter’ protests in India to protest against supposed extra-judicial killings of Muslims in the country. He had in May 2020 said that the ‘Black Lives Matter’ protests in the US after the death of George Floyd need to be replicated in India to “oppose extra-judicial killings of Muslims in the country”. At that time, ‘Black Lives Matter’ protests meant riots and violence, where the protestors vandalised and looted stores. They had clashed with police, set vehicles, buildings including several police stations and medical stores on fire.

He wanted such riots and arson by Muslims and supporters of Muslims in India, which can be definitely called an anti-India activity.

Ashok Swain also regularly posts Hinduphobic tweets and mocks BJP, RSS, Narendra Modi and other leaders using condemnable terms. He denies that Muslim rulers had destroyed and looted Hindu temples, and he denies that there was a genocide of Kashmiri Pandits. He had called LTTE a Hindu terror organisation and even blamed Hindutva for the Covid-19 pandemic. He also praises Pakistan while criticising India, which indicates the direction of his loyalty.

His comments definitely come under hate speech, and the govt has the right to cancel his OCI card citing the same.

AAP spokesperson Yogesh Jadwani blames Hindu religious organisations for the party defeat in Gujarat, says they spread rumour that Kejriwal is Muslim

Voters of Gujarat have given a record number of seats to the BJP in the recently held Gujarat Assembly elections. While BJP soared to new heights, Congress was reduced to just 17 seats while Aam Aadmi Party could not even touch double digits. Upset over his defeat, the Aam Aadmi Party’s chief spokesperson attacked Hindu religious institutions and blamed them for the party’s humiliating loss.

AAP chief spokesperson Yogesh Jadwani tweeted, “The reason why the main faces of the AAP lost the election in Surat are BAPS, Haridham Sokhada, Vadtal Gaddi along with Swaminarayan and other religious institutions.”

AAP spokesperson’s tweet(which was later deleted.

In the same tweet, he further wrote, “On the day before the polling, all the organizations spread lies and misled that Arvind Kejriwal was a Muslim and they would not vote for AAP.”

In his tweet, Yogesh Jadwani accused Hindu institutions, especially Swaminarayan institutions, for AAP’s loss but did not put forward any evidence to back the allegation.

The Bharatiya Janata Party criticised AAP for trying to blame religious institutions for their own failures. Zubin Ashara, media co-in-charge of the Gujarat state unit of the BJP, replied, “As soon as the elections are over, the Aam Aadmi Party started showing its anti-Hindu face. BAPS, Haridham, Swaminarayan, all these institutions are revered by us. Insulting them and defaming them like this is condemnable.”

Italia had called the Swaminarayan sect ‘Bullshit’

However, this is not the first time that an AAP leader has insulted Hinduism or the Swaminarayan sect. Not long ago, a video of AAP’s Gujarat state president Gopal Italia calling the Swaminarayan sect ‘Bullshit’ went viral.

In the viral video, AAP state president Gopal Italia was seen repeatedly insulting the Swaminarayan sect and its followers. He said, “These people say not to eat garlic onions. If someone sits next to us and asks us not to eat garlic onions, we know which temple or community they belong to. All this is big bullshit.” He further said, “Those who believe in this sect are wrong and I condemn them.”

Even though the people of Gujarat have given them a crushing defeat by rejecting them, the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and its leaders do not seem to be learning any lessons.