India Ahead, a free-to-air English news channel, is reportedly facing a severe financial crunch, and there are rumours that the channel will be shut down soon.
On December 18, one of the media representatives who used to work at the India Ahead news channel complained that the authorities at the news channel has blocked the payment of all its workers for around 4 months. The media representative who says that he was employed at the Production Control Room (PCR) in the India Ahead channel alleged that its CEO Sudeep Mukhiya and channel head Bhupen Choubey were also ignoring the employees who were demanding their stuck salary.
“I used to work on switching in PCR in the India Ahead channel. It’s been 4 months since I left the channel but till now the people on the channel have not given me my salary. When I messaged CEO Sudeep Mukhiya, instead of replying, he blocked me. Also, the channel head Bhupen Choubey has blocked me,” the person was quoted by Bhadas4media report.
The former employee said that he had tried all his means to communicate with the channel authorities but nothing has worked out. “I mail and call HR every day but they are not responding. Now the channel is also closed. No one’s salary has been given since July till now. All the people working at the channel have become unemployed,” the person added.
The employee also added that channel head Bhupen Choubey and Sudeep Mukhiya were ignoring the channel workers who were demanding their stuck salaries. Seeking help, the complainant said that the financial condition of the workers working at the media channel had worsened and that they needed to be helped on an immediate basis.
These development suggest that the channel is facing financial trouble, and there are rumours that the channel will be shut down soon. The Bhadas4media report actually said that India Ahead channel has shut down, and several people on social media also claimed the same. But that claim is incorrect, as the channel is still broadcasting programs and is available on DTH platforms. While the social media accounts of the channel are also active, the website of the channel is not operational at present.
हिन्दी न्यूज़ चैनल के बाद अब एक अंग्रेज़ी न्यूज़ चैनल और बंद हुआ। दिल्ली के तथाकथित शराब घोटाले से भी कम्पनी के तार जुड़े हुए थे।
However, the channel is not available on Dish TV for some time now, as it was removed from the Zee Group-owned Direct to Home platform due to the non-renewal of an agreement. Dish TV had said that the channel had to be removed due to payment issues.
Moreover, sources in the channel have denied rumours of shutting down. While the channel admitted irregularities in some payments, they said that the channel will remain to exist, and they are revamping the news channel. The sources said that revamped India Ahead will be launched sometime in next year.
The channel India Ahead was started in June 2018 by Andhra Prabha Media Group. Its headquarters are in Hyderabad, India, and it has studios in both Delhi and Hyderabad.
In June 2020, Goutam Mootha, MD of Andhra Prabha Group, announced senior leadership changes to the English new channel India Ahead. It is then, that Sudeep Mukhia, formerly with CNN-News18, joined India Ahead as Group President, News Room Operations and Editorial Strategies while the chief editor of the channel was Bhupendra Chaubey. The Editorial President is Sudha Sadanand, and the Executive Editor is Neha Khanna.
It is notable that India Ahead and Andhra Prabha Group have been named in the Prosecution Complaint filed by Enforcement Directorate in the Delhi Liquor scam. The two groups had received ₹1.70 crore from Indo Spirit, one of the companies accused in the case.
On 17th December 2022, The Citizen published an article written by Dr. Rositta Joseph Valiyamattam that profiles Nirjhari Sinha, one of the directors of Pravda Media Foundation – the parent company of propaganda peddling website Alt News. While profiling Nirjhari Sinha, the article attempts to glorify her husband Mukul Sinha, comfortably ignoring his role in spreading misinformation about the Godhra carnage that sparked the 2002 Gujarat riots.
What is there in the article?
The article starts with the Sinha couple’s work with Physical Research Laboratory (PRL), and their initial urge to work for the poor that took birth in the PRL. The profile also has a statement from Alt News co-founder Pratik Sinha, as he details how his mother stood firmly with his father Mukul Sinha, and his decisions. Dr. Rositta Joseph Valiyamattam calls the Sinha couple “crusaders for justice, peace, and truth – who built a wonderful, life-long mission of social service impacting the lives of hundreds and thousands”.
While glorifying Mukul Sinha for his activities after the Gujarat riots in 2002, sparked because of the Godhra carnage in which 59 innocent Hindus were burnt alive by an Islamist mob, The Citizen hails Mukul Sinha and Nirjhari Sinha and credits them for 28th February being celebrated as the Communal Harmony Day. It conveniently forgets the couple’s role in spreading lies about the root cause of the 2002 Gujarat riots.
Mukul Sinha – an ‘activist’ for Gujarat riots – is actually a liar for Godhra carnage
There were a number of actors playing their role in changing the outlook of the horrifying incident that sparked the riots. It has been over 20 years since the train carrying Karsewaks from Ayodhya was burnt in Godhra, Gujarat, by a Muslim mob. 59 Hindus were burnt alive, including women and children. The propagandists tried their level best to paint the incident differently to save the murderous Muslim mob from facing any criticism from the public. Mukul Sinha and Nirjhari Sinha were among the frontline propaganda peddlers who spread the lies.
For the media and the activists like the Sinha couple, Teesta Setalvad, and others who tried to whitewash the Godhra carnage, it was almost justified that these men, women, and children were murdered simply because they were Hindus, because they were returning from Ayodhya and because they chanted Jai Shree Ram while returning from a place where they wanted their Ram Mandir built. It was the duty of the media to report how the Muslim mob burnt Hindus to death. However, they were more bothered about being politically correct than standing with the unvarnished truth of how Hindus had been massacred.
Role of Mukul Sinha in spreading false information about Godhra riots
Mukul Sinha is the father of Alt News co-founder Pratik Sinha. Known for his immense hate for Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Sinha left no stone unturned to spread false information about the Gujarat riots of 2002.
The real story of the Godhra train burning incident
Justice Nanavati-Mehta Committee report [pdf] talks about how the Godhra carnage took place. Right after the Godhra platform and boundary, there is a road and a locality named ‘Signal Falia.’ “It extends up to the culvert and goes further towards A cabin. It is a locality mainly inhabited by Ghanchi Muslims,” the report mentions. When the train arrived, a lot of unauthorized vendors, mainly Ghanchi Muslims, would come on the platform and sell snacks, cold drinks, bidis, etc.
The report further states that the train arrived at the platform at 7:43 AM as it was running about 5 hours late, and there was a halt of about 5 minutes. In its evidence portion, the report cites media reports from February 28, 2002, the day after the carnage, where leading mainstream media had reported that a mob had set Hindus on fire. They mentioned how Hindus were returning from karseva and how the mob set the train coaches on fire with petrol.
The Times of India had mentioned how the train was stopped at Signal Falia, where someone had pulled the chain, and after the initial pelting of stones on coach S6 and S7, windows were broken, and petrol bombs were thrown inside. The Indian Express, too, carried eyewitness statements on how the mob had set the coach ablaze after pelting stones.
How did the conspiracy theories come to be, denying justice to Hindu victims?
As evident, barring the usual whitewashing, there was consensus that it was a mob that had set fire to the train, causing the brutal massacre of 59 Hindus. While the media might not have put the details in the headline to be politically correct, there was no other theory that was peddled about how the Hindus died. It was only later that these theories emerged.
Mukul Sinha’s Jan Sangharsh Manch and other ‘liberals’ and ‘activists’ fought tooth and nail to portray the eyewitnesses of the Godhra carnage liars, as evidenced in the Nanavati-Mehta Commission Report. They went to lengths to create various narratives like ‘fire was started from inside,’ ‘short circuit,’ ‘spontaneous scuffle,’ ‘Karsevaks raised provocative Jai Shri Ram slogans’ (20 years later, Jai Shri Ram is ‘Hindu terrorist war cry’ and Allahu Akbar is ‘voice of courage’ as per the same set of ‘liberals’). Mainstream media and politicians were complicit in making the world think that the Hindus burnt alive on the train did not matter.
“No person had suggested for quite a long time that fire in coach S/6 of Sabarmati Express train was caused in any other manner,” the Commission report said. Except, in response to this, a member of Jan Sangharsh Manch, a ‘civil rights organization’ started by ‘activist-lawyer’ Mukul Sinha, filed a statement and questioned the criminal conspiracy angle of the state government and claimed that after the ‘evidence’ collected by him, it “appeared to him that burning of coach S/6 was because of the spontaneous scuffle and fight that had taken place between Ramsevaks and Muslim vendors on the platform of Godhra railway station and not because of any conspiracy hatched earlier.” Mukul Sinha’s son, Pratik Sinha, now runs the propaganda website ‘Alt News,’ which regularly whitewashes crimes committed by Islamists.
Mukul Sinha took a garb of Jan Sangharsh Manch to hide his political aspirations
Mukul Sinha was a scientist turned “activist.” He was a physicist working with the Physical Research Laboratory in Ahmedabad. In 1988, he obtained a law degree and founded ‘Jan Sangharsh Manch,’ a ‘civil rights organization’ along with his wife, Nirjhari Sinha. The leadership of Jan Sangharsh Manch also founded the New Socialist Movement, which was registered as a political party with the Election Commission in 2007. Mukul Sinha had also contested elections in the past and lost.
Alt News and Pratik Sinha carry the lie-peddling legacy of Mukul Sinha
Mukul Sinha, along with his son Pratik Singh used to run an online rag called “Truth of Gujarat,” which basically spread lies about the carnage of Hindus and tried to blame the victims for their own death. Essentially, Sinha senior, with a bunch of ‘like-minded’ propagandists, would float theories on the 2002 Godhra carnage and subsequent riots in Gujarat.
In 2004, pro-Congress ‘activist’ Shabnam Hashmi organized a seminar in Delhi, “Rebuilding Justice and Hope in Gujarat: The Agenda Ahead.” Amongst those present in the seminar were: actresses Sharmila Tagore and Nandita Das, lawyers Indira Jaisingh and Nitya Ramakrishnan, and journalists Praful Bidwai and Rajdeep Sardesai, along with many known critics of the then Gujarat CM Narendra Modi. They all tried to figure out ways to ‘fix’ Modi legally, where Sinha gave a presentation to ‘prove’ the Muslim mob setting the train to fire was ‘false’ and that the fire was an ‘accident.’
This kind of propaganda was seeded through the ‘truth of Gujarat’ by Mukul Sinha along with his son Pratik.
Pratik Sinha, as mentioned earlier, now runs another propaganda outlet Alt News that whitewashes the crimes carried out by Islamists and often ‘gives context’ to crimes against Hindus which further waters down the crimes. When not busy whitewashing crimes of Islamists, Alt News ‘fact-checks’ memes and satirical pieces to stay relevant. Nirjhari Sinha (Wife of Mukul Sinha and mother of Pratik Sinha), Pratik Sinha, and Murlidhar Deomurari – all associated with Alt News are members of Jan Sangharsh Manch. Nirjari and Murlidhar are directors of Alt News.
Internet sensation and former Bigg Boss OTT contestant Uorfi Javed has finally spoken about the reports about her alleged detention in Dubai.
Earlier it was reported that Uorfi was detained by Dubai police for allegedly shooting a video in the emirate while wearing a ‘revealing outfit’.
Uorfi has clarified that although the police officers did arrive at the shooting location, however, she was neither detained nor the police had any objection to her skimpy outfit.
In fact, the issue was about the location where she was shooting. Uorfi while speaking to ETimes said “Because of some issues at the location, the police had arrived to halt the shoot. The production team did not extend the time we were allowed to shoot because it was a public place, so we had to leave. It had absolutely nothing to do with my clothes. We shot the remaining sequences the next day so it was all sorted.”
In another development, it has been reported that a man named Naveen Giri has been arrested by Goregaon Police for allegedly sending rape and death threats to Uorfi Javed over WhatsApp.
The accused has been booked under sections 354(A) (sexual harassment), 354(D) (stalking), 509, and 506 (criminal intimidation)of the IPC and IT Act.
Mumbai | Goregaon Police arrested a man, Naveen Giri for giving rape & life threats through WhatsApp to TV actress & social media influencer Uorfi Javed. FIR was registered u/s 354(A) (sexual harassment), 354(D) (stalking), 509, 506 (criminal intimidation)of IPC as well as IT Act pic.twitter.com/r2Q9dnMZtO
Uorfi Javed was earlier diagnosed with laryngitis in Dubai earlier today, according to reports. The actress confirmed this in a video posted on her Instagram stories, saying, “This doctor finally diagnosed me with laryngitis and tonsillitis.”
Recently, a case was filed against Uorfi for allegedly committing illegal and obscene acts on social media and public places. Advocate Ali Kaashif Khan Deshmukh filed the complaint at Andheri Police Station against the actor. As per the police official, the complaint was filed on Friday, December 9.
Uorfi Javed was named one of the “Most Searched Asians on Google 2022,” according to a recently published list. Uorfi was ranked 43rd on the list, ahead of many well-known Bollywood actresses. Uorfi was also recently seen in MTV’s dating reality show ‘Splitsvilla 14’.
The Central government has decided to install 22 new mobile towers in the bordering areas of Arunachal Pradesh to improve mobile connectivity along the Line of Actual Control (LAC).
The government is also planning to build a mini hydel project for the military. Deputy Commissioner of Tawang, Kesang Ngurup Damo, told ANI that, 22 new mobile towers would be installed in the bordering areas of the state and the Centre has already sanctioned it.
“The BSNL and Airtel will install new mobile towers. BSNL will install 18 mobile towers while Airtel will install 4 mobile towers. We had given a proposal for installing 45 mobile towers and the Centre has approved 22 mobile towers as of now.
The government has taken the initiative to improve mobile connectivity along the bordering areas, aiming at good mobile connectivity to security forces and civilians.
The Defence areas have been given priority. The new mobile towers will be installed in the bordering areas like Chuna, Yangtse, Damteng Bumla, Klemta, Y Junction, T Gompa area, Lumpo, Zemithang,” Kesang Ngurup Damo said. He further said that the government has also decided to build a 200 Kilowatt mini hydel project for the military in the T-Gompa area.
“Apart from this, the government will build another mini hydel project in the Mago area. The government has also planned to extend electricity supply to the uncovered bordering areas,” the top official said.
He further said that the district administration has executed several projects of both central and state government and many development projects are going on.
(This news report is published from a syndicated feed. Except for the headline, the content has not been written or edited by OpIndia staff)
On December 22, Thursday, the National Health Authority (NHA) announced a Digital Health Incentive Scheme (DHIS) for the stakeholders in the health sector. As per a press release issued by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, this scheme aims to boost health transactions in India under the flagship Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission (ABDM) scheme.
Under this scheme, hospitals, diagnostic laboratories, and enterprises that provide digital health solutions like Hospital/Health Management Information Systems (HMIS) and Laboratory Management Information Systems (LMIS) will receive incentives. According to the Union Health and Family Welfare Ministry, eligible health facilities and digital solutions companies will be able to obtain financial incentives of up to Rs 4 crores under the DHIS, depending on the number of digital health records they create and link to ABHA (Ayushman Bharat Health Account).
This incentive is available to health facilities (hospitals and diagnostic labs) that are registered with ABDM’s Health Facility Registry (HFR) and meet the scheme’s eligibility criteria.
Dr. RS Sharma, CEO of NHA, asserted that the scheme aims to promote digital health by encouraging healthcare facilities and software companies to participate in the ABDM scheme. “We believe that this scheme will encourage more healthcare facilities and digital software companies to join ABDM in providing patient-centric healthcare. Through this financial incentive scheme, we are encouraging the adoption of digital health.”
“We’re also including solution (HMIS/ LMIS) providers in the incentive scheme so that they can handhold other health facilities to come on board and facilitate the ecosystem’s strengthening,” Dr Sharma added. Incentives have aided in the early adoption of other citizen-centric programs such as UPI, TB case notification, Janani Suraksha Yojana, and so on.”
Incentives would be offered to healthcare facilities with 10 or more beds, laboratory/radiology diagnostic centers, and digital solution providers (entities providing ABDM-enabled digital solutions).
Image via PIB
And the incentives will be based on the number of ABHA-linked transactions, i.e. digital health records created and linked to ABHA, the Ministry statement stated.
Image via PIB
The incentives for public-sector facilities will be added to the funds under Rogi Kalyan Samiti. The incentive scheme’s estimated initial financial outlay is Rs. 50 crores for a six-month period beginning January 1, 2023.
Notably, NHA on December 17 informed that over 4 crore digital health records of citizens have been linked to the Ayushman Bharat Health Accounts (ABHA) of beneficiaries under Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s flagship scheme Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission.
NHA further said that over 29 crore citizens have generated their ABHA so far.
With the assistance of state governments, the digital linking of individual health records with ABHA is being carried out extensively across the country’s various health facilities. Among the leading contributors to ABHA-linked health records are the Government of Andhra Pradesh, Ayushman Bharat PM-JAY, the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare’s Reproductive and Child Health (RCH) scheme, eHospital, and Cowin.
Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission
On September 27 this year, Prime Minister Narendra Modi launched the countrywide Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission to create a seamless online platform to enable interoperability within the digital health ecosystem. Under the new mission, the government aims to provide a digital health ID to every citizen in the country where health records can be saved securely in digital format. With this mission, the government will be able to provide better health facilities to the remotest areas of the country.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s game-changer Ayushman Bharat has been achieving new milestones with each passing day. The Lancet, a leading medical journal in its recently published study report said that due to India’s national health insurance scheme i.e. Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Aarogya Yojana (PMJAY) District hospitals in India gain a net annual financial benefit of $ 26.1 (1839.3) million at current utilisation levels, which can potentially increase to $ 41.8 (2942.9) million with an increase in patient volume share.
— The Lancet Reg Health-Southeast Asia (@LancetRH_SEAsia) December 21, 2022
The Lancet estimated a net annual financial gain of $ 169,607 (11.9 million) for an average district hospital, rising to $ 271,372 (19.1 million) per hospital with increased utilisation.
Leveraging Power of Technology to Transform Healthcare!
Under Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission, more than 1 lakh patients availed benefit of faster OPD registrations using the scan & share service.
Notably, under the Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission, more than 1 lakh patients availed the benefit of faster OPD registrations using the scan and share service.
On December 22, an image of the President of the United States of America (USA) Joe Biden, First Lady of The USA Jill Biden and President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy went viral in which President Biden was seen grabbing Zelenskyy’s posterior.
One President’s hand on another President’s buttocks was more than enough to cause a laughter riot on social media.
There is one rule that must be followed. If something is extremely emotional or funny or provocative, in most cases, it is “too good to be true”. Following this principle, we decided to fact-check the authentication of the image.
During the investigation, we looked around for a similar image and found that Jill Biden uploaded the exact frame on December 21 (local time) with the caption saying, “President Zelenskyy, we hope you take our love and support back to Olena and your children, and all the families of Ukraine.” However, we noticed that President Biden’s hand was nowhere close to President Zelenskyy’s posterior.
President Zelenskyy, we hope you take our love and support back to Olena and your children, and all the families of Ukraine. ? pic.twitter.com/z1uqAAl8B8
In the next step, we downloaded both images and decided to investigate the matter properly. The first step was to resize the images in a way that we only had two frames with exact dimensions. At this point, it was clear that one of the images was edited.
The original image (left) was sourced from Jill Biden’s Twitter account. The edited image (right) was sourced from Twitter.
Then we enlarged the image to the point where we could only see the trio standing in the frame.
Original image (left) edited image (right).
Now, look at the images and see the points that we have marked. We created a GIF to make it easier to understand how things were edited in the image.
This GIF explains the changes.
At Mark 1, you will notice that whoever edited this image cut President Biden’s arm from here and rotated it downwards towards President Zelenskyy’s posterior.
These images explain what was changed during the editing of the photograph.
At Mark 2, you will notice that the crease on President Zelenskyy’s back has been wiped out during editing. President Biden’s arm was here in the original photograph.
At Mark 3, you will notice in the original image that Jill’s hand was on President Biden’s thumb. Whoever edited it could not remove the thumb, which is still under Jill’s hand.
At Mark 4, you will notice the crease of President Zelenskyy’s back was wiped out to cover the empty spot created by removing President Biden’s arm.
We also found a video of the arrival of President Zelenskyy. At the 0:40 timestamp in the video, Jill Biden placed her hand on the back of President Zelenskyy, then President Biden placed his hand on President Zelenskyy’s back. As you can notice, President Biden’s hand was not on Zelenskyy’s buttocks.
President Biden and first lady Jill Biden welcome Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky (@ZelenskyyUa) to the White House on his first foreign trip since the Russian invasion. pic.twitter.com/OhKxek3oQM
While the world is celebrating the holiday season ahead of Christmas and New Year’s day, a top clerical body in Indonesia directed the Muslim community to avoid greeting others with ‘Merry Christmas’. “It’s still up for debate whether it’s halal or haram, so better steer clear of it, don’t say Merry Christmas,” Islamic cleric Ma’ruf Amin said on Wednesday.
According to the reports, the cleric, who is also the chairperson of the Islamic body in Indonesia, said that Muslims can wish ‘Happy New Year’ while they should avoid wishing ‘Merry Christmas’ to others. The Council also said that it is ‘haram’ (means prohibited) for Muslims to attend Christmas parties or celebrations. “The MUI has issued an edict forbidding Muslims from attending such rituals because they are religious in nature. It would be haram for any Muslim to take part,” Ma’ruf added.
Islamic Clerics quote Quran to say wishing ‘Merry Christmas’ is a sin
Meanwhile, another report published by The Islamic Information ahead of Christmas shared that it is ‘haram’ to celebrate any non-Muslim festival including Christmas in Islam. Christians commemorate the birth of Jesus (son of god). Christmas celebrations are under the purview of shirk (sin). The report said it is one of the most punishable offenses in Islam.
The report also quoted verses from the Quran that seemingly prohibit the celebration of Christmas. “O people of the book! Do not go to extremes regarding your faith; say nothing about Allah except the Truth. The Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, was no more than a messenger of Allah and the fulfillment of His words through Mary and a spirit created by a command from Him. Allah is only One God. Glory be to him. He is far above having a son!” the quote from Quran reads.
Image source- TheIslamicInformation.com
Zimbabwean Islamic scholar Mufti Menk asked Muslims to wish ‘Wa Alaikum as-salam’ in response to a ‘Merry Christmas’ wish
Earlier, Zimbabwean Islamic scholar Mufti Menk had stated that Muslims need not forcefully wish Merry Christmas and instead should say “Wa Alaikum as-salam” if someone wishes them Merry Christmas.
In the video that was published 5 years ago, the scholar could also be seen slamming the media persons for portraying the Islam community in a ‘wrong’ manner and said that ‘not wishing Merry Christmas doesn’t mean Muslims insult the Christians.’
Saudi cleric Assim Alhakeem said wishing ‘Merry Christmas’ is haram
There reportedly have been many incidents in the past when several Islamic clerics and scholars from all over the world have directed the Muslim community to not celebrate Christmas and avoid wishing ‘Merry Christmas.’ In 2018, a Saudi cleric named Assim Alhakeem said on Twitter that wishing someone Merry Christmas was prohibited in Islam. “Saying Merry Christmas means that you acknowledge that Allah has a begotten son! No Muslim would do that,” Alhakeem tweeted.
This is totally prohibited.
Saying Merry Christmas means that you acknowledge that Allah has a begotten son! No Muslim would do that. https://t.co/yoUOYcfxTO
In a subsequent tweet, the cleric clarified that his viewpoint on the issue was not intended to promote enmity or to prohibit cohabitation. “However, not congratulating them doesn’t mean we are showing hatred or being hostile or refusing to coexist! It is simply following our religion while they follow theirs! We respect their right and they must – as well – respect our right,” he wrote.
Muslim cleric Sheikh Younus Kathrada from British Columbia said, ‘wishing Merry Christmas is sin graver than murder’
A Muslim cleric from British Columbia was quoted by a media report saying that those Muslims who wish Christians “Merry Christmas” are guilty of sins graver than murder. Sheikh Younus Kathrada, in 2018, delivered a speech in British Columbia where he said, “There are those who will say to them “Merry Christmas” – what are you congratulating them on? Are these congratulations on the birth of your Lord? Is that acceptable to a Muslim? Are you now approving of their beliefs? By saying that you are approving of it.”
Canadian Cleric Younus Kathrada: Congratulating Christians for Christmas is Worse than Murder pic.twitter.com/1S73XPjfRk
“If a person were to commit every major sin – committing adultery, dealing with interest, lying, murder… If a person were to do all of those major sins, they are nothing compared to the sin of congratulating and greeting the non-Muslims on their false festivals,” he added.
Islamic scholar Shamsudheen Fareed from Kerala called Christmas ‘unIslamic’
Then an Islamic cleric from Kerala, Shamsudheen Fareed, sparked a controversy in 2016 as he called Christmas and Onam unIslamic festivals since they have ‘elements of polytheism’. He also ordered the Muslims to stay away from the celebrations during Christmas. As per the reports, Fareed is the unofficial spokesperson of an Islamic organization in Kerala which is responsible for spreading radicalism amongst the Kerala youth.
‘It is 100% wrong to wish Merry Christmas’: Radical Islamic preacher Zakir Naik
Absconding radical Islamic preacher Zakir Naik, in a video published in April 2019, had said that it was 100% wrong for Muslims to wish Merry Christmas. “To reach your goals, you cannot use wrong means brother. What is Haram to them is also Haram to you. When you are wishing Merry Christmas to them, you are agreeing that he is the son of God and that is Shirk (sin). Because they believe that Jesus Christ is the son of God. Irrespective of whether they are practicing Christians or not, they celebrate the day because of His birthday,” Naik emphasised.
“If you don’t know what Christmas stands for and happen to wish someone, Allah may forgive you. If you drink alcohol, mistaking it for Pepsi, Allah may forgive you. But if you are doing it to build a relationship after knowing what Christmas stands for, you are building your place in Jahannam (Hell),” he added.
Over the years, Islamic clerics and scholars have commented on the Christian festival calling it ‘haram’, and directed the Muslims not to wish ‘Merry Christmas’ to others. Notably, having a Christmas tree is also prohibited for Muslims since celebrating Christmas is haram in Islam.
On December 12, 2022, various mainstream media houses published a story with claims that a 19-year-old Dalit man, Lalla, was assaulted by seven “upper caste” men for “accidentally touching food” at a wedding function in Naubasta area in Gonda, Uttar Pradesh. The incident had reportedly taken place on December 9, 2022, in the Naubasta village under the Wazirganj police station area of the Gonda district of Uttar Pradesh.
However, when OpIndia spoke to the villagers about the incident mentioned above, we learned that it was a result of an old Kotedari dispute and had nothing to do with caste. In fact, even in the ongoing police inquiry, the caste aspect of this crime has not yet been proven.
Aaj Tak gives a ‘caste angle’ to a scuffle led by an old dispute
Dainik Bhaskar gives a ‘caste angle’ to a scuffle led by an old dispute
Lallantop gives a ‘caste angle’ to a scuffle led by an old dispute
The Telegraph gives a ‘caste angle’ to a scuffle led by an old dispute
TOI gives a ‘caste angle’ to a scuffle led by an old dispute
How mainstream media gave the episode a ‘caste’ angle
According to the aforementioned mainstream media outlets, the victim’s sister Renu Kumari lodged a police complaint on December 10 in which she accused seven people in the village of assaulting and abusing her 19-year-old brother Lalla. Renu, who is a Dalit, said that the accused Sandeep Pandey, Amresh, Shravan, Saurabh, Ajit, Vimal and Ashok, all of them who are Brahmins, used casteist slurs and brutally thrashed her brother for touching the food during a wedding function arranged at the house of Sandeep Pandey.
The reports said that Renu said in her complaint that as soon as Lalla picked up a plate for himself, Sandeep and his brothers abused him and thrashed him. She added that the accused wanted them to eat after they left the wedding venue. When Lalla’s elder brother Satyapal tried to save him, they beat him up and damaged his motorcycle. It further quoted Renu as claiming that the accused barged into their house at night and attacked her brother with batons and bricks.
The media reports further stated that based on Renu Kumari’s complaint the Gonda police registered a case and booked the 7 accused under sections 147, 323, 427, 504, 506, 336 of the IPC and SC/ST Act. OpIndia is also in possession of a copy of the FIR.
On December 12, 2022, Indian Express and Lallantop published nearly identical reports on the matter. Most of these media reports stressed that no arrests had been made in the case, while only India.com reported that 4 arrests were made. However, the fact was that six suspects were granted bail by the Magistrate in IPC Section 151 (whoever knowingly joins or continues in any assembly of five or more persons likely to cause a disturbance of the public peace). These reports, in fact, reproduced everything mentioned in the FIR, quoting Renu Kumari.
‘The entire brawl started over food and an old Kotedari feud served as a trigger’: DSP tells OpIndia
The SHO of Wazirganj police station was also quoted as saying that he has been conducting an inquiry into the case. However, according to Uttar Pradesh Police guidelines, the SHO does not have the authority to investigate crimes under the SC/ST Act. DSPs conduct such investigations.
OpIndia spoke with Tarabganj Sansar Singh Rathi, Deputy Superintendent of Police in Gonda district, about the incident. DSP Rathi is in charge of this case. He stated unequivocally that there was no untouchability angle in this incident, as highlighted by various media outlets. He said that the entire brawl started over food and an old Kotedari feud in the community had served as a trigger to the December 9th incident. (For the uninitiated, a Kotedar is a government contractor who sells and distributes food products in the village under government schemes.)
The DSP went on to explain that in practically all cases in his circle area, the SC/ST Act is generally invoked in the beginning, and the police then thoroughly investigate to determine whether the matter fits under the purview of the Act or not.
He said the inquiry into the case is still ongoing, and the police are yet to file the final charge sheet.
Renu Kumari’s brother was the village’s Kotedar
Sandeep Pandey is one of the accused in the December 9, 2022 incident. According to him, Devisharan, the brother of Renu Kumari, who filed the complaint, was the Kotedar of the village. During an investigation, some government officers caught him red-handed engaging in fraudulent activities, and he was imprisoned. He was recently released after being given bail. Sandeep went on to say that Renu had filed a false complaint against him and others in order to get revenge since she believed they had tipped the government officials about her brother’s scam. “She filed a case against seven people, including myself, to seek revenge,” Sandeep added.
What was the old Kotedari feud which led to the December 9th scuffle
On August 25, 2021, Gonda’s District Supply Officer, Atul Srivastava, filed an FIR under Section 3/7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, against Renu Kumari’s brother Devisharan, the Kotedar of the village. The FIR was filed at Wazirganj Police Station. OpIndia has a copy of the FIR as well.
Following the filing of the FIR, SDM Tarabganj cancelled Devisharan’s allocation on October 13, 2021. Devisharan appealed the ruling to the commissioner of the Devipatan division. After a lengthy hearing, Commissioner IAS Rakesh Chandra Sharma stamped the decision to remove Devisharan’s quota on September 21, 2022, declaring that the SDM’s ruling was legitimate.
OpIndia has a copy of the commissioner’s order. In this order, the name of Diwakar Pandey is registered as a witness to the action. According to Sandeep Pandey, Diwakar is one of his own family members.
As per Sandeep, Devisharan was removed from the post of Kotedar and instead Aarti Pandey was inducted into the post. Aarti Pandey is also a member of his family. Amresh Pandey, who assists Aarti Pandey in running the Kotedari work in the village is also named in the complaint filed by Renu Kumari, said Sandeep.
Sandeep Pandey denounced media reports about the accused’s arrest calling them misleading. He stated that six people have been granted bail in the case of IPC 151 (disruption of peace), and that an inquiry into the SC/ST issue is ongoing. Ajit Mishra, another accused in the case, told OpIndia that he was a victim of political rivalry in the area.
A Dalit Bajrangi from Rampur Tengraha, near Naubasta, claimed to be an eyewitness to the December 9 incident. He stated in a conversation with OpIndia that Sandeep Pandey had simply asked Lalla not to touch the food with his hands. Following this, the complainant’s family started bickering with Sandeep and his brothers, he said.
The argument was over food
Sandeep Pandey stated that Renu’s brother was taking food by directly placing his hand into the bowl rather than using a spoon. ‘When we barred him from doing so, a bogus case was filed against us’, said Sandeep denying the charges of assault and vandalism. He added that the fake case was filed because of the old conflict.
It’s worth noting here that the report published by the Times of India on this incident quoted Renu Kumari as saying that they took up the case with the gram pradhan and elders in the village regarding the conduct of Sandeep and his brothers. When the accused got to know about this, they barged into their house and thrashed Lalla again and indulged in vandalism. Sandeep, however, strongly refuted the claim. He categorically stated that nothing of that sought ever happened. Sandeep alleged that those whose names are in the FIR had not cooperated with the current village Pradhan in the election, which is why the latter was against them.
On December 17, a horrific incident came to light in Jharkhand when police arrested a man identified as Dildar Ansari in connection to the brutal murder of his wife, Rubika, a tribal woman. The incident took place in the Sahibganj district of Jharkhand. The accused admitted to the murder of his wife and claimed he killed her over ongoing disputes between them because of his previous marriage. Rubika and Dildar got married only a month ago.
As per reports, Dildar trapped 22-year-old Rubika into a love affair and did not disclose that he was previously married. They started getting into fights regularly when she learned about his first wife. Dildar’s first wife was against his relationship with Rubika and instigated him. Reports suggest that he plotted to kill her because of the family’s constant pressure and continuous fights between the couple.
Dildar killed Rubika and chopped her body into 50 pieces using an electric cutter. The incident, which reminded people of the Shraddha Walkar case, sparked outrage in the country. Dildar reportedly stored Rubika’s body parts in a sack and disposed of them in nearby localities. The matter came to light when locals caught dogs eating the body parts. The police were alerted, and the investigation led to Dildar. The family of the accused was also involved in the murder. The police also detained his parents, first wife, sister, and brothers. Dildar’s maternal uncle was the one who reportedly killed Rubika.
The increasing cases of ‘love jihad’ in Jharkhand
Rubika is not the first tribal woman who got trapped in a love affair with a person of a particular religion. In the last few years, there has been a spike in such cases in Jharkhand and other states where tribals are in large numbers. In the past, organisations like Popular Front of India (PFI) reportedly grabbed 10,000 acres of land using this ‘tactic’ of marrying tribal girls.
In July 2022, OpIndia published an exclusive report on PFI’s ‘India Vision 2047’, where they talked about making India an Islamic nation by 2047. The document read, “From all the cadres who are being given PE, those with talent are to be spotted and recruited to be given advanced training on weapons including firearms and explosives. Meanwhile, Party should utilise concepts such as ‘National Flag’, ‘Constitution’, and ‘Ambedkar’ to shield the real intention of establishing an Islamic rule and reach out to SCs/STs/OBCs. We would reach out to the executive and judiciary and strive to infiltrate our members at all levels to gather information and get favourable outcomes in matters of our interest. Further, liaisoning is to be established with foreign Islamic countries for funding and other help”. This text was part of Stage 2 of the plan.
The land-grabbing technique
One of the main reasons behind luring tribal women for marriage is the law (Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act or CNT Act and Santhal Parganas Tenancy (SPT) Act in the case of Jharkhand, that prohibits the sale and purchase of tribal land to anyone who does not belong to the tribal communities. With such a law in force, Islamists have found a loophole to grab the land belonging to tribal communities.
As per Jagran’s report, a notable spike in such cases is seen in the state of Jharkhand. The report suggested that cases of love affairs, love marriages, and even rapes where the woman is tribal and the man is Muslim have become common. Notably, the tribal communities seem to be okay with the Muslim practice of marrying more than one woman. The report noted that most marriages do not occur as per any rituals and the couple “just started living together”.
Furthermore, tribal women are being used for entry into politics as well. The report suggested that in the last year, around a hundred such marriages came to light. Muslim youth marry tribal women, then make them contest elections on a seat reserved for tribals and gain entry into politics if they win the election. Speaking to OpIndia, Ramesh Shinde of Hindu Janajagruti Samiti also pointed out the spike in such cases.
Tribal women face atrocities from multiple directions
Land grabbing is not the only problem that comes with such marriages. Shinde said, “In Jharkhand, there is CNT Act. No one can sell tribal land to anyone. These people do Nikah with tribal women to grab their land. There are also some cases where they lure the women who work at construction sites. See, tribals are generally poor people, they lure one of the tribal women working at the construction site. Then they lure another woman and marry her. After that, these women continue to work and earn while these men sit at home.”
As per Jharkhand reports, there have been cases where young tribal boys and girls were pushed into human trafficking. Shinde added that the members of the banned organisation PFI are marrying tribal women in Jharkhand from extremely backward areas. They are conspiring to gain control over the land and mind of these women under the guise of marriage. Intelligence Department sources revealed there have been over 1,000 such cases. Most of these cases are from Pakur. He also gave some examples of such cases reported by Jagran in 2018.
Kabir Haq, a resident of Anjana village under the Muffasil police station area of Pakur, married Lovely Tudu.
Azad Ansari, a resident of Littipada in Pakur, is married to Sunita Marandi.
Fakre Alam, a resident of Littipada in Pakur, is married to Tinu Soren.
Latiful Ansari, a resident of Bhawanipur of Pakur Muffsil, is married to Chandmuni Marandi of Hiranpur.
Rahim Ansari, a resident of Mohanpur, is married to Sonoti Hansda of Hiranpur.
Abdul Ansari, a resident of Rahaspur in Pakur Muffsil, is married to a Bogoy worker.
Azad Ansari of Hiranpur is married to Sunita Marandi of Hiranupar.
Sahabuddin Shaikh of Maheshpur is married to Mala Koda.
Mohd Maulvi of Durgapur has married Manika Hembrom.
Jameel Sheikh, a resident of Kumarpur, has married Waha Murmu, a resident of Jogadih.
Furthermore, he pointed out that in 2014, national shooter Tara Shahdev was lured into marriage by a man named Rakibul Hassan who hid his identity and told Tara that his name was Ranjeet Kohli. He used to force Tara to convert, and reports suggested he even got her bitten by dogs. Shinde said, “Such cases show how Hindus are unaware of Love Jihad and its consequences.”
Tribals are being targeted in many states
Shinde also pointed out similar cases in the North East. He said, “There is a Tribe in Nagaland by the name Sumi Naga. Bangladeshi Muslims travel there for work. They started targeting women of the Sumi Naga community. Slowly, the situation reached a point where there was a new Tribe named “Sumiya”. These are the children of Sumi Naga women and Muslim men. It is an attempt to control the forest land. They want to take hold of the Naxal movement in the forests of these states.”
OpIndia Hindi reported in November about the cases of land grabbing in Madhya Pradesh, Jharkhand, and other states. During an event, Chief Minister Shivraj Chouhan of Madhya Pradesh pointed out the problem of land grabbing in the state. He said, “Many times, our daughters and sisters are lured into marriage. They get the land in their names, and those lands become tribal lands. Conversions are also used to grab land.” CM Chouhan implemented Panchayat Extension Act (PESA) to put a curb on such cases.
Rampant conversions among tribal communities
Muslims are not the only ones who are targeting Tribal communities in India. There have been countless reports of Christian Missionaries converting Tribal people on a large scale. Jagran’s report pointed out that the Pahadiya community is one of the 32 Tribal communities that live in Jharkhand. Rubika was from Pahadiya community. Most of these tribal people have already converted to Christianity, and Muslims are targeting those who are left.
Over 10,000-acre land grabbed by PFI members
In 2018, Bhaskar reported that PFI members bought 10,000-acre land in Santhal, Jharkhand. They managed to grab this land by marrying tribal women. PFI was banned in Jharkhand during that period. However, despite the ban, they continued to purchase thousands of acres without any resistance. Special Branch had sent a report to Police Headquarters on the matter, noting PFI was increasing its presence in Pakud, Jamtada, Sahebganj, and Godda.
The report further pointed out that PFI was funding its members and providing funds to illegal Bangladeshi Muslims to purchase land in the area. While registering the land, the Tribal women mention the names of their fathers instead of their husbands to avoid getting caught.
Multiple stories from Jharkhand with similar background
In November, Bhaskar reported how banned organisation PFI’s members are marrying Tribal women and grabbing land. They noted three stories that were just the tip of the iceberg. Bhaskar noted how Muslims were marrying Hindu tribal women, buying lands, and making them enter politics. Interestingly, though the land cannot be sold to a non-tribal, once a tribal woman dies, the property goes to her husband and children. Only SDM’s signatures are required for the transfer of the land.
BJP leaders raised the issue multiple times
In recent times, Bharatiya Janata Party leaders on national and state levels have raised the issue several times. In September 2022, former Chief Minister of Jharkhand and BJP leader Raghubar Das alleged that PFI members grabbed thousands of acres in Jamshedpur. He said that 8-10 women were killed in a few days which pointed to a nexus.
In the same month, Union Minister Giriraj Singh demanded a law against conversion and asked to bring Muslims under caste census. He accused Muslims of taking advantage of the loopholes and demanded strict laws. Pointing out the issue of Love Jihad and Land Jihad in Jharkhand, he accused the state government of Muslim appeasement.
OpIndia tried contacting Giriraj Singh and Raghubar Das for a comment on the subject but could not reach them.
On Wednesday, December 21, Congress leader and former Union Minister Jitendra Singh Alwar threatened News 18 anchor and Journalist Aman Chopra with legal action over a video where Rahul Gandhi is seen patting Jitendra Singh’s back as he ties Rahul Gandhi’s shoelaces during the ‘Bharat Jodo Yatra’.
Journalist Aman Chopra on Wednesday tweeted a video of the incident with the caption, “The one who has been patted on the back by Rahul Gandhi is former Union Minister Bhanwar Jitendra Singh.”
Quoting Chopra’s tweet, Jitendra Singh asked Chopra to delete his tweet and taunted him for having experience with court proceedings. “Mr. Aman Chopra kindly take the tweet down. I am sure you would be having experience about court proceedings,” Singh tweeted.
Congress leader Supriya Shrinate, Chairperson of Social Media and Digital Platforms of the Congress party, also accused the journalist of spreading fake news, and she also threatened legal action saying that Aman Chopra might be well versed with legal procedures. “What you are tweeting with the intention of spreading fake news is wrong. Jitendra Singh ji has given a reply to your fake news mastermind – read it. By the way, you understand the legal process very well,” Shrinate tweeted in Hindi.
जो फ़ेक न्यूज़ फैलाने के आशय से तुम ट्वीट कर रहे हो वो ग़लत है।
जितेंद्र सिंह जी ने तुम्हारे फ़ेक न्यूज़ सरग़ना को जवाब दे दिया है – पढ़ लो।
Reacting to Shrinate’s tweet, Chopra said that his intention was only to share a positive image from the Yatra where Rahul Gandhi tapped Jitendra Singh’s back.
“No Supriya ji, instead of threatening me with legal action, if you had seen the video, you might not have written like this. Rahul ji patting Jitendra ji lovingly on the back. If you find the intent of showing a good picture of Bharat Jodo flawed, then the problem is in your thinking and not in the tweet. thank you,” Chopra tweeted in Hindi.
नहीं सुप्रिया जी,मुझे लीगल कार्रवाई की धमकी देने के बजाय आप video को देखतीं तो शायद ऐसा ना लिखतीं।
राहुल जी जितेंद्र जी की पीठ पर प्यार से थपकी दे रहे हैं।भारत जोड़ो की एक अच्छी तस्वीर दिखाने का उद्देश्य आपको दोषपूर्ण लगता है, तो आपकी सोच में समस्या है ट्वीट में नही। धन्यवाद ?? https://t.co/UlXzdPMDLa
Notably, Jitendra Singh, who appears to be on a spree of threatening people with legal action, has also warned a defamation case against BJP IT cell in-charge Amit Malviya, who tweeted a video on Wednesday claiming that the Congress leader was tying Rahul Gandhi’s shoe laces.
In the 20-second clip, Rahul Gandhi was seen tapping Jitendra Singh Alwar and pointing to the ground, after which the latter bent down to tie his shoelaces.
“Former union minister Bhanwar Jitendra Singh goes down on his knee to tie Rahul Gandhi’s shoe lace. The arrogant entitled brat instead of helping himself is seen patting his back…इसी परिपाटी की बात कर रहे थे खड़गे जी? कांग्रेस में पिद्दियों की कमी नहीं है,” Malviya tweeted.
Former union minister Bhanwar Jitendra Singh goes down on his knee to tie Rahul Gandhi’s shoe lace. The arrogant entitled brat instead of helping himself is seen patting his back…
इसी परिपाटी की बात कर रहे थे खड़गे जी? कांग्रेस में पिद्दियों की कमी नहीं है। pic.twitter.com/FtHCCwNTwu
To this, Jitendra Singh claimed that he was tying his own shoelaces and not that of Rahul Gandhi’s. He further asked Malviya to apologise or be ready to face legal action.
“As incharge of ruling BJP’s National Info Dept your tweet is a complete lie and defamatory. The fact is that after being pointed out by Rahul ji upon my request he paused briefly so that I could tie my own shoelaces. Delete the tweet and apologize to RG or face legal action,” Singh tweeted.
As incharge of ruling BJP’s National Info Dept your tweet is a complete lie and defamatory.
The fact is that after being pointed out by Rahul ji upon my request he paused briefly so that I could tie my own shoe laces.
Interestingly, Congress leader Supriya Shrinate went a step ahead to ‘prove’ that Singh did not bow down before Rahul Gandhi to tie his shoelaces as his shoes do not have lace.
Shrinate called BJP IT cell head Amit Malviya a ‘fake news peddler’ for sharing a video where Jitendra Singh could be seen bowing down and getting on his knees in what appears to be tying Rahul Gandhi’s shoelace.
In her tweet, Shrinate shared a picture of a shoe claiming that it is Rahul Gandhi’s shoes which he was wearing during the Yatra and said that his shoes were laceless.
“Hey fake news peddler @amitmalviya here’s a pic of Rahul Gandhi Ji’s shoe, which is laceless!! You have been caught lying yet again, but since you are authorised by BJP Prez JP Nadda and PM Modi to lie everyday – all 3 of you owe an apology to @RahulGandhi STOP LYING,” Shrinate tweeted.
Hey fake news peddler @amitmalviya here’s a pic of Rahul Gandhi Ji’s shoe, which is laceless!!
You have been caught lying yet again, but since you are authorised by BJP Prez JP Nadda and PM Modi to lie everyday – all 3 of you owe an apology to @RahulGandhi
But the photo that she posted didn’t match what she was claiming, as it is not a laceless shoe in the image. It can be clearly seen that there are laces on the show, and the word ‘Lock Laces’ can be seen on it. This means, this is a shoe with laces, but it has Lock Laces, which means that the laces do not need to be tied, they can be tightened using the lock. But the lock may become loose, and it is required to tighten it again.
Lock Laces is a brand of shoelaces with locks that be installed on regular shoes replacing the regular laces.
Shrinate was also trolled by netizens for sharing a picture of Rahul Gandhi’s shoes.
This is not the first time that the Congress party, which frequently claims to be a champion of press freedom, has threatened legal action for the slightest inconvenience. The Congress party, which frequently accuses the BJP of undermining Indian democracy’s fourth pillar, has a history of threatening the media over whatever it finds objectionable.
In October this year, Congress leaders took to Twitter to threaten the Delhi-based digital media company ScoopWhoop with legal action over some old memes of Rahul Gandhi. In April 2015, ScoopWhoop published an article titled: “These Rahul Gandhi Memes Will Tell You Why He Needs Special Treatment”, wherein it shared some hilarious memes about the Congress leader.
INC youth leader Srinivas BV lambasted ScoopWhoop for those 2015 memes it had published in jest about Congress senior leader Rahul Gandhi. The Congress leader threatened to sue ScoopWhoop if those ‘malicious, false, and defamatory’ Tweets were not deleted within 24 hours with an apology on all platforms.
We take strong notice of these malicious, false and defamatory tweets by @ScoopWhoop aimed at tarnishing the image of the leader who is exposing the govt.
Calling upon you to remove these tweets in 24 hours with an apology on all platforms or legal consequences will follow.
Since the time of former Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, Congress has threatened journalists for being “too critical” of their policies or whatever they deem inappropriate, and the tradition seemingly continues.