The couple, Pakistani cricketer Shoaib Malik and Indian tennis player Sania Mirza, who made headlines last week for their separation, have now thrown their fans in surprise and puzzled. Reportedly the two will shortly be seen together on a reality show, even though the pair have not confirmed nor rejected the divorce rumours.
The show will stream on the OTT platform Urduflix and has the working title of ‘The Mirza Malik Show.’ Urduflix made the announcement on Instagram and tagged Sania and Shoaib. UrduFlix is Pakistan’s Urdu over-the-top (OTT) platform. The company posted a picture of the athletes on its Instagram account with the caption “The Mirza Malik Show very soon only on Urduflix.”
Sania is shown standing with her hand on Shoiab’s shoulder on the poster. The Burj Khalifa may be seen in the backdrop visuals. Currently, the pair is living in Dubai.
Urduflix is a Pakistan-based OTT platform which streams various shows that include Pakistani, Iranian, Arabic, Turkish etc content. It claims to be Pakistan’s first Urdu OTT platform.
While their fans are overjoyed by the news, others are also questioning whether the divorce rumour is a PR gimmick to promote the show. A fan wrote, “So divorce was for publicity purposes. Shame!” Another Instagram user commented, “But I heard they are divorced. What about that?” Replying to this comment, another user wrote, “It was all a publicity stunt to generate fame and money. Like always they achieved that!!!”
Sania Mirza and Shoaib Malik moved to Dubai after getting married in 2010. Izhaan, their son, was born in 2018. According to rumors, Shoaib Malik was cheating on Sania Mirza. Ayesha Omar, a model from Pakistan, has been connected to him. According to Pakistani media reports last week, the two are finalizing the legal processes to dissolve their marriage.
Trinamool Congress Minister Akhil Giri is under the spotlight for his misogynist remarks against President Droupadi Murmu, who is the first member of the tribal community to hold the post of the Indian President.
Giri, who serves as the Minister for Correctional Administration, was recently heard as saying, “He (Suvendu Adhikari) claimed that I don’t look good. How beautiful is Suvendu? We don’t judge people by their appearance. We respect the office of the President (Draupadi Murmu). But have you looked at her face?”
#WATCH | “We don’t judge anyone by their appearance, we respect the office of the President (of India). But how does our President look?,” says West Bengal Minister and TMC leader Akhil Giri in Nandigram (11.11.2022) pic.twitter.com/UcGKbGqc7p
His derogatory remarks have drawn the ire of social media users and politicians alike, who are now questioning the party for harbouring such a Minister.
Trinamool Congress has a history of misogynist behaviour, even though some of the party leaders are known to mouth platitudes about women’s empowerment. A big part of the problem is the TMC supremo herself, who has a history of victim blaming and has been accused of trivialising heinous crimes such as rape.
In April this year, TMC supremo Banerjee downplayed the brutal rape and murder of a 14-year-old girl in Nadia’s Hanskhali village. She claimed that ‘everyone was aware of the girl’s love affair, so one was left to wonder here whether it was an actual rape or pregnancy that went wrong’.
Shocking statement by Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee, who trivialises the brutal rape and murder of a 14 year old girl in Nadia’s Hanskhali. She questions the victim and asks if it was a love affair or a case of unplanned pregnancy gone awry!
“As a layman, I am saying where would someone get the evidence of whether the girl was actually raped or pregnant. Or was there any other reason, like someone beat her up or she died of some illness?” Banerjee remarked.
“There was a love affair for sure, her family knew about it, and their neighbours also knew about it. Now if a girl and a boy love each other, I cannot punish them”, she cast aspersions on the case.
The West Bengal Chief Minister blatantly attempted to trivialise statutory rape, only because the prime accused in the case was the son of Trinamool Congress (TMC) Gajna Gram Panchayat member Samar Gowla.
The Infamous Park Street Case
From time to time, Mamata Banerjee had tried to insinuate that rape cases in West Bengal were motivated by political vendetta. She has often accused victims of lying and staging a ‘rape’ to defame her government.
The most glaring example of such problematic behaviour has been her remarks in the aftermath of the 2012 Park Street rape case. An Anglo-Indian woman, by the name Suzette Jordan, was raped in a moving car by five men on February 6, 2012, when she was returning home from Park Street in Kolkata.
Soon after the news surfaced, TMC supremo Mamata Banerjee absolved the accused of all charges. She had dubbed the incident as ‘shajano ghotona‘ (concocted incident) that was allegedly ‘designed to malign the government.’
Three years later in 2015, a Kolkata Court upheld the rape charges in the Park Street case and found accused Nasir Khan, Ruman Khan and Sumit Bajaj guilty.
When Mamata Banerjee blamed malls and multiplexes for rise in rape cases
After another rape case in Burdwan’s Katwa in the same year, Mamata Banerjee again dismissed the rape allegations, even before the investigation was concluded.
“A political party is doing all this, shouting rape. They are playing this drama. Harmader diye natok shajachhe jatey Banglar nam kharap hochhe (They are staging an act to give a bad name to West Bengal)”, she was heard as saying.
In 2013, during a debate in the West Bengal legislative assembly about the rising cases of rapes in the State, the CM insinuated that it was due to an increase in the population of the State. She had also blamed modernisation, an increase in shopping malls and multiplexes for rising rape cases.
Akhil Giri gets away with mere lip service
When Mamata Banerjee herself has made disparaging comments about rape victims, it, therefore, comes as no surprise why Akhil Giri was able to get away after mocking the physical appearance of President Droupadi Murmu.
TMC brushed off its responsibility by putting out a tweet of ‘condemnation’ and not taking any concrete action against its motormouth leader. And this bolstered the politician to use his apology to further rationalise his statements.
I respect President. I mentioned the post&made a comparison to respond to Suvendu Adhikari,I didn’t take any name. He had said Akhil Giri looks bad in his appearance. I’m a min,took oath to office. If something is said against me, it’s an insult to Constitution: WB Min Akhil Giri pic.twitter.com/9w1oY2BuZA
“I respect President. I mentioned the post & made a comparison to respond to Suvendu Adhikari, I didn’t take any name. He had said Akhil Giri looks bad in his appearance. I’m a Minister, took oath to office. If something is said against me, it’s an insult to Constitution. I said ‘President’, I didn’t take anyone’s name,” he had justified.
For all those who are outraged by the remarks of Akhil Giri, there is little hope of grievance redressal within the Mamata Banerjee-led-Trinamool Congress since the culture pretty much stems from the top.
On Saturday (November 12), National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) chairman Priyank Kanoongo informed that a case of religious conversion of three children in a children’s home has come to notice in NCPCR’s recent investigation in Madhya Pradesh.
Kanoongo took to Twitter to inform about the incident and wrote, “During an inspection of a child welfare centre in Raisen, Madhya Pradesh, a case was found where the operator was changing the names and religion of three children,” he tweeted.
रायसेन,मध्यप्रदेश में शिशुगृह के निरीक्षण में 3 बच्चों के नाम व धर्म बदल कर बालगृह संचालक द्वारा नए नाम व धर्म के दस्तावेज बनवा लेने का मामला मिला है।बच्चों के धर्मपरिवर्तन का मामला गम्भीर है,ज़िला प्रशासन को संचालक हसीन परवेज़ के विरुद्ध प्रकरण दर्ज करने के निर्देश दिए हैं।
— प्रियंक कानूनगो Priyank Kanoongo (@KanoongoPriyank) November 12, 2022
Haseen Parvez, the operator of the centre, changed the religion of the three children to Islam, changed their names to Muslim ones and got their Aadhar cards made. He also claimed himself to be their guardian of the children and put his name on their Aadhaar cards. One of the children was reportedly renamed Shahrukh.
The matter came to light during an inspection of the centre by NCPCR chairman Priyank Kanoongo after receiving an oral complaint. When he talked to the children, they said that their original names were different which have been changed at the centre. After that, Kanoongo ordered a probe and confiscation of records.
According to media reports, the incident occurred in the Gauharganj area. The three siblings who converted to Islam are all minors, aged 4, 6, and 8. The converted minors involved two girls and one boy. These children are said to be from Madhya Pradesh’s Damoh district and belong to a Hindu family under the OBC category.
During the lockdown amid the Corona pandemic in the year 2020, all three were separated from their parents in the Mandideep area. They were found roaming around near Bhopal, and they were sent to Raisen Child Welfare Committee by the Bhopal Child Welfare Committee. As the parents of the children could not be located, they were handed over to the Children’s Home in Gauharganj run by Navjeevan Samajik Sanstha. It was decided that they will stay at this centre until their parents can be located.
Taking benefit of the absence of their parents, the Children’s Home operator Haseen Parvez converted them to Islam. He claimed that the person who brought the children to the centre had said that they are Muslims.
An FIR has been filed against the centre’s operator Haseen Parvez. This child centre is a government-funded private entity. Kanoongo stated that the operator will be restricted from operating a similar facility in the future.
In meanwhile, the father of the children has been located, but there is no information of the mother yet.
Indian billionaire Mukesh Ambani has joined the race to purchase the prestigious English Premier League football team Liverpool FC. The present owners of Liverpool, Fenway Sports Group (FSG), decided to put the club up for sale earlier this week. They bought Liverpool FC for 300 Million Pounds back in 2010. If Mukesh Ambani wants to buy the club, he will have to beat off competition from companies in the Middle East and the United States.
According to a report by Mirror, FSG wants to sell the club for £4 billion. The amount is unlikely to faze Ambani as the 8th richest person in the world is worth $90 Billion and he loves to invest in sports. In addition to being the commercial partner of the All India Football Federation (AIFF), Mukesh Ambani, chairman of RIL and the second-richest industrialist in India, has also backed Indian Super League for Football in India. Ambani also owns Mumbai Indians, the most successful side in Indian Premier League (IPL) history.
A statement from FSG read, “There have been a number of recent changes of ownership and rumors of changes in ownership at EPL clubs and inevitably, we are asked regularly about Fenway Sports Group’s ownership in Liverpool.”
It further said, “FSG has frequently received expressions of interest from third parties seeking to become shareholders in Liverpool. FSG has said before that under the right terms and conditions, we would consider new shareholders if it was in the best interests of Liverpool as a club.”
The Anfield team has seen tremendous success under FSG in recent years, with Jurgen Klopp’s team finally winning the Premier League for the club, their first league title in 3 decades. The club also went on to win the Champions League, FA Cup, Carabao Cup, and European Super Cup titles over the last three years.
However, FSG has not always given a black cheque book to the manager to buy players in the transfer window as they have been required to sell players to raise money before buying. However, with Ambani’s wealth, the shackles might be off their transfer activity and the club may become more adventurous in the transfer market.
In Uttar Pradesh’s Agra district, police have arrested 3 persons, identified as Shahrukh, Rizwan Qureshi, and Imran on charges of theft inside a temple. From the culprits, the Police recovered items stolen from the Hindu temple, including a Maa Kaali idol, bells, a lamp (Diya) used for doing Aarti, and a Sheshnag idol. The incident reportedly took place on November 9 and all three accused were arrested on Friday (November 12). One of the accused is said to be a member of the Minority Morcha of a political party.
The reported incident took place in the Lohamandi police station area. Hemant Kumar Prajapati, a local resident filed the complaint following the theft in the temple. According to his complaint, on the morning of November 9th, the lock of the main gate of Shri Sankat Mochan Hanuman Temple in Pul Chhinga Modi was found broken. According to Hemant, everything was scattered on the temple floor that morning. Tarun Sharma, a priest, is said to be present when they went inside and discovered that many of the temple’s articles had been stolen.
According to the complainant, the police were immediately notified about the incident. As per the complaint, the money in the donation box, Kaali Maa statue, bells and the lamp used for performing the aarti, the yellow metal Sheshnag idol, the lamp, the electric drum used for performing the aarti, two buckets, fans were all missing. In his complaint, Hemant Kumar demanded that the police take strict action against the unknown thieves.
The police registered a complaint against unknown thieves under Section 380 of the IPC based on Hemant’s complaint. After further investigation, the police identified Rizwan, Shahrukh, and Imran as the perpetrators of the crime. The majority of the items stolen from the temple were also recovered from them.
According to the police, additional legal action is being taken in accordance with the rules. According to reports, all three accused had planned to sell the goods stolen from the temple but were caught before they could do it.
Journalists from news channels across the country are rushing to Gujarat because of the Gujarat Assembly elections. Most of them are seen covering the news of their main subject of interest i.e. Gujarat elections, while some are forced by their habits and are seen trying to tarnish the image of Gujarat in some way or the other. Recently, a journalist made ridiculous claims about digital and UPI payments in Gujarat which are completely baseless.
Navbharat Times journalist Mithilesh Dhar Dubey, who calls himself ‘Bhadohi Wallah’ on Twitter, made this claim alleging that digital payments do not work in the state. Warning journalists coming to Gujarat for reporting on Gujarat elections, he tweeted, “Warning/suggestions for journalist colleagues coming to Gujarat reporting – Bring enough cash. Besides Ahmedabad, the facility of payment from Google Pay, Phone Pay, Paytm, etc. is negligible in other districts. The facility for payment by card is also very low.”
गुजरात रिपोर्टिंग पर आ रहे पत्रकार साथियों के लिए चेतावनी/सुझाव
पर्याप्त कैश लेकर आएं। अहमदाबाद के अलावा दूसरों जिलों में गूगल पे, फोन पे, पेटीएम आदि से पेमेंट की सुविधा न के बराबर है। कार्ड से पेमेंट की सुविधा भी बहुत कम है।#GujaratElections2022
After Mithilesh tweeted this, Abhiyan magazine’s reporter Arjav Parekh replied, “This is absolutely wrong. Digital payments have also reached villages and towns in Gujarat. We live in Gujarat, we know.” In response, the Navbharat Times journalist wrote another claim in a replying tweet that read, “I am in Rajkot. If there is a facility for digital payment in the Honest restaurant – one of the most famous food chains in Gujarat – tell me. From Ahmedabad to Rajkot, I saw it. This is just an example. In UP Bihar, even a Bhujiawala also takes online payment.”
राजकोट में हूं। गुजरात के सबसे फूड चेन में से एक ऑनेस्ट रेस्टोरेंट में कहीं डिजिटल पेमेंट की सुविधा हो तो बता दीजिए। अहमदाबाद से लेकर राजकोट तक देख लिया। ये उदाहरण मात्र है। यूपी बिहार में भुजा वाला भी ऑनलाइन पेमेंट ले लेता है।
As a journalist and as a Gujarati, I also know that these claims of Mithilesh are false, yet we, OpIndia, thought of directly fact-checking this attempt of tarnishing the image of Gujarat.
A local source, Ram Sinh Zala, who lives in Rajkot, was contacted by OpIndia. At first, he tried to find out the truth of this claim on the call. After that, Zala said, “This is a baseless claim. The digital payment option has been going on here for years not only in hotels but also on small lanes.”
Ram Sinh Zala asked OpIndia to give him just 10 minutes and said, “I’m just going to an Honest restaurant outlet nearby and checking for your to know what is the truth.” After some time, Ramsinh Zala reached the outlet of the Honest Restaurant on Kalavad Road in Rajkot and from there made a video call to show us that digital and UPI payment facilities are available there.
An online payment facility is available in theHonest Restaurant. Image Source: Ramsinh Zala
When OpIndia spoke to the employee of that Honest restaurant, it was found that not only this but also at every Honest outlet in Gujarat and across the country, digital and UPI payment facility has been available for many years. He further said, “Yes, sometimes it may happen that the facility is not available temporarily due to some technical reason, but it happens just once or twice a year, that too for an hour or two.”
जूठ की फैक्ट्री मैं अभी ये राजकोट के ऑनेस्ट रेस्टोरेंट में खड़ा हु।देख लो।और ऑनेस्ट के सभी आउटलेट पे ऑनलाइन है। कभी भी आए कोई भी आउटलेंट की विजिट करते है। ऑनलाइन ना मिले तो मैं आप जो कहे वो दंड चुका दूंगा।अगर मिल जाए तो तू पत्रकारिता छोड़ देगा? pic.twitter.com/PIjniMMfoi
There was a lot of anger among Gujaratis against this unsubstantiated claim of the Navbharat Times journalist on Twitter. People also gave him a lot of evidence in response to his tweet.
RTI activist Sujit Hindustani, in his reply, posted a photo of a sugarcane juice shop in a village on the Ahmedabad-Mehsana highway where digital and UPI payments are accepted, Sujit Hindustani wrote in his tweet, “Please don’t spread lies. Digital payment is being accepted even by small people.”
Another Twitter user @Aalapshukla wrote, “I live in Ahmedabad. I have to travel from Jamnagar to Daman Palanpur and leave in my car with just two 2000 notes in my pocket. There is no need to pay with those two notes anywhere. Only mobile UPI is enough to pay.”
मैं अहमदाबाद में रहता हूं। जामनगर से लेकर दमण पालनपुर तक घूमना होता है और मेरे जेब में सिर्फ दो 2000की नोट लेकर कार से निकलता हूं। कहीं भी वह दो नोट निकालने की जरूरत पड़ती नहीं है सिर्फ मोबाइल यूपीआई से पेमेंट हो जाता है।
@Jaypal551983 wrote, “Stop spreading these false rumors. Digital payment facility is available all over Gujarat. Stop spreading false and incomplete information.”
ये जूठी अफवाहें फेलाना बंध कीजिये पूरे गुजरात में डिजिटल पेमेंट्स की सुविधा उपलब्ध है है जूठी और अधूरी जानकारी फेलाना बंध करें
The anger among the people due to this false claim was no less. A user named @Jagdish96068228 warned Mithilesh in his tweet that read, “Now do duty in Gujarat only by wearing a mask on your rotten face, otherwise Gujaratis will slap on the face, you liars.”
अब अपनी सड़ी हुई सकल पर मास्क लगाकर गुजरात में घूमना, वरना गुजराती ठोबडा रंग देंगे, चोर जूठे मक्कार की ओलाद
@i_m_prapti put up a poll on the tweet by Mithilesh and asked the people whether digital payments are available everywhere in Gujarat or not. So far, 351 people registered their responses, out of which 94% of people said that digital and UPI payment facility is available everywhere in Gujarat.
मैं गुजरात से हूं। यहां हर जगह डिजिटल पेमेंट उपलब्ध है।
A user named @just_hu02 wrote in a sarcastic tone, “Journalists spreading false news should be suspended for 1 year. His social media ID should also be suspended for a year.”
गलत न्यूज फैलने वाले पत्रकार को 1 साल के लिए सस्पेंड कर देना चाहिए। एक साल तक उनका सोसलमिडिया id भी सस्पेंड कर देना चाहिए।?
Thus, an OpIndia investigation reveals the truth that the claim made by Navbharat Times journalist Mithilesh Dhar about digital and UPI payments in Gujarat is not only misleading but also completely false. It is just an attempt to tarnish the image of Gujarat just before the elections.
On Sunday, Haseeb ul Hasan, a former Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) councillor in East Delhi Municipal Corporation, climbed to the top of an electricity transmission tower in Shastri Park, saying that party executives have seized his documents. It is said that he was denied a ticket for the forthcoming Delhi municipal body elections, and as a result, he vowed to kill himself and climbed the tower.
Hasan alleged that the Aam Aadmi Party sold the ticket to Deepu Chaudhary for Rs 3 crores and then wanted money from him. Since he could not afford to pay the amount, he was denied a ticket.
Delhi:AAP’s Haseeb-ul-Hasan who was allegedly unhappy over not being given ticket for MCD poll&climbed a transmission tower,later came down
Said,”Had media not come Durgesh Pathak,Atishi,Sanjay Singh wouldn’t have returned my paper.They sold ticket to Deepu Chaudhary for Rs 3Cr” pic.twitter.com/0l0PiJgaJb
He said, “Aam Aadmi Party’s Durgesh Pathak and Atishi will be responsible if something happens to me, or if I die. They have my original documents, including my bank passbook. Tomorrow is the last day for filing nominations but they are not giving my documents to me.”
Police officers, firefighters, and BSES officials, as well as ambulances, arrived at the scene and asked Hasan to come down. At 10:51 AM, fire personnel received word that someone had climbed an electricity tower in the Gandhi Nagar area.
Around 3 PM, Hasan came down, claiming that AAP leaders had returned his documents due to media pressure. “Durgesh Pathak, Atishi, and Sanjay Singh would not have returned my papers if the media had not come. I will file my nomination tomorrow,” Hasan said. When questioned if he would run as an independent candidate, Hasan replied he wasn’t sure.
Haseeb ul Hasan had earlier jumped into an overflowing sewer drain at Shastri Park in March this year. Speaking to reporters, the nominated AAP councillor stated that the drain had been overflowing for some time and that, despite numerous complaints, the local MLA had failed to resolve the situation. As a result, Hasan chose to shoulder the load and demonstrate his point. His followers afterwards bathed him in milk while chanting anti-BJP slogans around him.
The AAP released its initial list of candidates on Friday, followed by a second list of 117 candidates the following day. The 250-ward MCD heads to the polls on December 4, and the ballots will be counted on December 7.
On November 8, a man killed his 22-year-old girlfriend in a room at Mekhla resort, which is under the jurisdiction of Tilwara police station in Jabalpur district, Madhya Pradesh. After the murder, the man posted a video on social media confessing to the crime.
The murder came to light after the main suspect in the case posted a video on social media displaying the girl laying in a pool of blood on a bed in a hotel room, with the man saying “Bewafai Nahi Karne Ka (do not be unfaithful)”. It implied that he killed her because she was cheating on him. (Potentially sensitive content, viewers’ discretion advised)
The video was taken immediately after assaulting the girl by slitting her throat, and she was still alive at that time, as she can seen be taking her last breaths in the video. According to police, the video was posted on the victim’s Instagram account on Friday.
The victim has been identified as Shilpa Jhariya, a Jabalpur resident from Barela. Later, the suspect posted another video in which he said he killed the girl because his business partner urged him to do so.
#NewsUpdate: मध्यप्रदेश- एक लड़की की होटल में हत्या करने के बाद दो आरोपी हुए फरार, एक के मत्थे मढ़ा इल्जाम, तो उसने जारी किया वीडियो और बताई सच्चाई, 3 दिन से फरार हैं दोनों आरोपी, पुलिस कर रही है जांच, वीडियो देखकर लगता है लिखा हुआ नोट पड़ रहा है युवक।@jabalpurpolice#Jabalpurpic.twitter.com/Nkt79qZL3G
All the videos were reportedly being posted from the Instagram account of the victim. They appear to have been removed from the account. There are still many photos on the Instagram of the victim which have been posted post her murder.
Abhijeet Patidar, the perpetrator, said in the video that he and his partner manage a business in Patna. Abhijeet alleged that his girlfriend was also having an affair with his business partner. She allegedly forced them to provide her Rs 12 lakh before running away to Jabalpur. Abhijeet continued by saying that his partner had asked him to kill her.
According to TI SL Jhariya of the Tilwara police station, it was found during the investigation that the deceased had come to the resort on Sunday with a man by the name of Abhijeet Patidar. Additionally, the pair had provided each of their own identity cards for authentication.
The deceased woman’s identity was recorded as Rakhi Mishra on the ID, which the authorities later found to be a counterfeit. When resort staff members were questioned, it was learned that on Sunday, the lady spent some time with Patidar before leaving, while Patidar stayed at the resort.
On Monday, nevertheless, the woman went back to the resort. The victim woman was still inside the resort when the man later left. The staff used a master key to unlock the door after the woman didn’t open the door until Tuesday morning, only to discover her laying blood-soaked.
Immediately after being alerted, the police launched an investigation into the matter. Searches are being conducted for the man who stayed in the victim’s room. According to SHO Jhariya, CCTV footage is also being examined for any clues relevant to him.
The fact that the young man boarded a cab to the resort has also come to the attention of the cops. On Monday, the accused and the lady boarded a cab to travel to the Mekhla resort. The cab driver was questioned by the police, and they also recorded his testimony. It is reported that the driver provided the police with a significant amount of information. Police also said that Abhijeet Patidar is from Gujarat, not from Patna.
The final match of the ICC T20 World Cup is being played between Pakistan and England on Sunday, 13 November 2022. It is being played at the Melbourne Cricket Ground in Australia. After the initial setback in this match, the condition of the Pakistan cricket team looks fragile. Meanwhile, a video of Pakistani girls is becoming increasingly viral on social media, in which the girls are seen praying for the victory of the Pakistan cricket team.
In the viral video, the girls are seen in school uniforms. The girls are also holding the Flag of Pakistan in their hands. In the video, a girl is seen praying for Pakistan’s victory and talking about the poor performance of England batsmen, on which other girls are seen saying ‘Ameen’.
In the video, the girl says, “Let Josh Butler and Alex Hales fail” to which the other girls say ‘Ameen.’ The next, the girl says “Let Mohammad Rizwan hit sixes” after which the other girls sitting there once again say ‘Ameen.’ Not only this but in the video, the girls are also seen praying for the courage of Pakistani bowlers to pick England’s wickets, to give strength to Babar Azam for hard-hitting, and for no rain in the match.
However, even after this, the condition of Pakistan remains very critical. Be it captain Babar Azam or Mohammad Rizwan and Haris, top order batsmen of Pakistan failed miserably in front of England bowlers. This is the reason why Pakistan has scored just 137 runs at the loss of 8 wickets in 20 overs against England. That is, England now has a target of 138 runs.
England has scored 71 after losing 3 wickets in 10 overs so far, and the winning target is not very far for them.
After losing the first two matches, Pakistan’s hopes of reaching the semi-finals were over. But, after South Africa’s defeat at the hands of the Netherlands, Pakistan reached the semi-finals. In the semi-final match, they defeated New Zealand. Now, they are playing the final match against England, who reached the final by defeating India.
Pakistan and England have won the T20 World Cup once each. Pakistan became the world champion of T20 cricket in 2009 and England in 2010. That is, whichever team wins the final on Sunday, November 13, 2022, will become the T20 World Cup winner for the second time.
After saying that there should be a debate with Australia-based American sociologist Salvatore Babones over his criticism of India’s left-liberal intellectuals, journalist Rajdeep Sardesai has now declined an invitation for such a debate from Babones. Salvatore Babones, an associate professor of sociology at the University of Sydney, had invited him for a debate after Rajdeep Sardesai refuted his views on Indian intellectuals and their role in negative perception of India at international forums, but Rajdeep Sardesai declined the invitation, saying he does not want to be the news, and that he is not an intellectual.
While Mr @sbabones I am tempted to accept the invite BUT as an old school journalist, (pre social media) I don’t wish to be the story! Plus I am NOT an intellectual but only an observer/reporter. Your offer is for India’s intellectuals to accept! I will play ‘neutral’ anchor!? https://t.co/km4nMDDAEk
Salvatore Babones has created quite a storm in Indian social media by showing the mirror to Indian left-liberal intellectuals. He is in India to attend India Today Conclave in Mumbai, and at that event, he made comments that have earned him the anger of the left and praise of the right.
At the India Today Conclave, Salvatore Babones said that India under Narendra Modi is wrongly portrayed as a fascist state, and said that Indian intellectuals were fuelling this false narrative about the country. He said that the organizations and the so-called ‘liberal’ intellectuals who build their opinions against the government are ‘anti-India’. “India’s intellectual class is anti-India. There is also a class of society who is anti-Modi and anti-BJP, as a class, not as an individual,” he said.
Salvatore Babones also slammed various global rankings of democracy, press freedom, hunger etc, where India is often ranked way below without any justification. He gave several examples, like how India is ranked below Hong Kong on press freedom. He said that these rankings are negatively influenced by Indian intellectuals who provide anti-India inputs to these studies.
Videos of comments by Salvatore Babones had gone viral, earning him the admiration of social media users. People particularly praised him for giving ‘befitting replies’ to Rajdeep Sardesai. Following this, the controversial journalist decided to confront him in a video blog later, instead of confronting him on the stage of the India Today conclave itself.
In a video posted by Sardesai on YouTube yesterday, he pointed out that Salvatore Babones is writing and commenting authoritatively on Indian Democracy when this is his first visit to India. While Babones has stated that he has expertise on competitive democracy in Asia-Pacific region, and has studied Indian political system extensively, Sardesai suggested that he should not be writing on India without visiting it first.
Responding to Salvatore Babones pointing out how Hong Kong ranking ahead of India in terms of freedom of press shows these rankings are not reliable, Sardesai just said it is an interesting argument.
Talking about how the professor was loved by common people but hated by left-liberals, Sardesai said that he has polarised Indians. Saying that the professor’s comments need to be countered, Rajdeep Sardesai then went on to do what Salvatore Babones had already accused Indian left-liberals of doing, cherry picking specific incidents to claim that freedom is under attack in India instead of using broad data.
He mentioned the case of the arrest of Siddique Kappan, the confinement of Jammu and Kashmir politicians after the abrogation of Article 370, the alleged lynching of minorities, the arrest of Disha Ravi, some cases of arrest of politicians on corruption charges etc. It seemed that Rajdeep Sardesai sought to justify the low ranking of in democracy and freedom rankings, despite the fact that they are only some specific incidents and the rankings should reflect overall data.
Listing such few incidents, Rajdeep Sardesai said that these are the issues that need a fact-based debate. ‘These are the issues that need a fact-based debate, these are the issues that need a debate not on rhetoric but on arguments based on hard data’, he said. He said that if such a debate is held between professor Barbones and his critics, they may be able to shed more light than heat about the state of Indian democracy.
Salvatore Babones replied to Rajdeep Sardesai by commenting on the video, accepting the invitation for a debate. “Thanks Rajdeep for the rebuttal! I’m happy to have finally visited India, but as a social scientist, I deal in data and documents, not personal experiences. I’d be thrilled to talk about it, if you’d like to take the time. Let’s have a chat!” he replied.
Interacting with people on YouTube who replied to his comment, Babones said that he has nothing against Sardesai, he in fact praised Sardesai for setting him up to look good, and added that he is looking forward to another conversion.
However, as there was no response from Rajdeep Sardesai after calling for a debate, yesterday Salvatore Babones ran a vote on Twitter to seek opinion on whether he should invite Rajdeep Sardesai for an informal video discussion about the status of Indian democracy. The poll received an overwhelmingly positive response, with 81.3% of voters saying yes.
Should I invite Mr. Rajdeep Sardesai to an informal video discussion about the status of Indian democracy?
Following this, Salvatore Babones posted a video on Twitter today morning, where he invited Sardesai for a debate that Sardesai proposed. Showing the results of the poll where 4/5th of people voted in favour of the debate, he said, ‘Rajdeep, I hope you will take this as an invitation. Let’s sit down for a talk’. He then added that he has already set up a chair for him, showing a chair with the book 2019: How Modi Won India by Rajdeep Sardesai seated on the chair.
He added that Rajdeep Sardesai need not come personally for the talk and it can happen online through video conferencing. Babones said that he hopes that Sardesai will agree to a real-time show where they will answer live questions from viewers. He said that it is important for people to understand that social scientists and journalists have different perspectives on things.
However, Rajdeep Sardesai declined the invitation, saying that being an old-school journalist, he does not wish to be the story. He also said that he is not an intellectual but only an observer/reporter, and it is upto the Indian intellectuals to accept the offer of the debate. He added that he will play ‘neutral’ anchor of this debate.
