Home Blog Page 612

How George Soros made a detailed plan to flood Europe with fake asylum seekers: Elon Musk calls radical leftist billionaire a hater of humanity

On Monday (6th January), Tesla CEO Elon Musk slammed George Soros for normalising illegal immigration in Europe and the United States.

Musk tweeted, “George Soros spent billions to create the fake asylum-seeker nightmare that is destroying America and Europe.”

The Tesla CEO shared a screenshot from an article (archive) published on the website of Soros in 2015. Soros had himself written that article for ‘Project Syndicate.’

Plan unveiled by George Soros through his article

At the onset, the article called for a ‘common asylum policy’ for countries belonging to the European Union to avert a political crisis stemming from the large influx of migrants (particularly from Syria).

“The EU needs a comprehensive plan to respond to the crisis, one that reasserts effective governance over the flows of asylum-seekers so that they take place in a safe, orderly way, and at a pace that reflects Europe’s capacity to absorb them,” it stated.

George Soros suggested a 6-step comprehension plan to settle illegal immigrants (referred to as asylum seekers in the article) in Europe. The first step was the annual acceptance of at least 1 million or 10 lakh migrants each year.

He suggested that the burden of taking in the people be distributed fairly between the member states of the EU. The far-left billionaire asked the European Union to provide €15,000 ($16,800) for each asylum seeker for a year.

Screengrab of the article by George Soros

“It is equally important to allow both states and asylum-seekers to express their preferences, using the least possible coercion. Placing refugees where they want to go – and where they are wanted – is a sine qua non of success,” the article stated.

In the second step, Soros called upon the EU to provide funding to Turkey, Lebanon and Jordan so that they can in turn support 4 million ‘asylum seekers’. He suggested at least €5,000 per refugee annually.

“In addition, the EU also should help create special economic zones with preferred trade status in the region, including in Tunisia and Morocco, to attract investment and generate jobs for both locals and refugees,” he continued.

The far-left billionaire recommended the creation of a single ‘EU Asylum and Migration Agency’ and a single ‘EU Border Guard’ instead of 28 separate asylum systems. This was his third step of the ‘comprehensive plan.’

In the fourth stage, Soros suggested the establishment of safe channels to facilitate the movement of illegal immigrants to ‘destination countries’ via Greece and Italy. He claimed that it would help in controlling panic.

The far-left billionaire explained the 5th stage in this manner-

“The next logical step is to extend safe avenues to the frontline region, thereby reducing the number of migrants who make the dangerous Mediterranean crossing. If asylum-seekers have a reasonable chance of ultimately reaching Europe, they are far more likely to stay where they are. This will require negotiating with frontline countries, in cooperation with the UN Refugee Agency, to establish processing centers there – with Turkey as the priority.“

As part of the last step, Soros suggested the European Union to ‘mobilise the private sector’ and turn NGOs, church groups, and businesses into sponsors.

He added that for the plan to succeed, funding, human and IT capacity would also be required to match sponsors with illegal immigrants.

“The exodus from war-torn Syria should never have become a crisis. It was long in the making, easy to foresee, and eminently manageable by Europe and the international community,” Soros concluded his article.

George Soros hates humanity, says Elon Musk

In a tweet on Tuesday (7th January), Elon Musk stated, “Soros really was a genius at arbitrage, whether finance or politics…Brilliant. I just wish he loved, rather than hated, humanity.”

In October 2023, Musk lashed out at the far-left billionaire for putting human civilisation under threat during a podcast with radio host Joe Rogan.

“In my opinion, (Soros) fundamentally hates humanity. He is doing things that erode the fabric of civilization,” he was heard saying.

UP: Gulzar and Salman mowed down two girls with their vehicle in Gorakhpur for opposing molestation, one dead, the other injured

0

In Uttar Pradesh’s Gorakhpur, Gulzar and Salman mowed down two cousin sisters with a loader van after they protested against molestation. The incident took place in front of Bhatgawan Panchayat Bhawan in Chaurichaura area of ​​Gorakhpur on Sunday (5th January). The incident unfolded when the two girls were going for their exams. While one girl died on the spot, the other sustained injuries. The locals tried to catch the driver of the van, however, he managed to escape.

Investigation revealed that the accused, both residents of Kaithwalia village, had attacked the girls by crushing them with a Magic van when they protested against molestation. Angry villagers of Gorakhpur blocked the Gorakhpur-Kushinagar highway for two hours on Monday (6th January) afternoon by placing the body of the girl who died. During this, the villagers, along with the family members, demanded that the accused be encountered and bulldozers be run on their houses.

On receiving the information about the blockade, SDM Finance and Revenue Vineet Singh, Magistrate Aarti Sahu, SDM Chaurichaura, SP North, two COs, the police force of six police stations and a PAC vehicle were called. During the conversation, the family demanded that the accused should be punished in the same way as the girl was killed adding that the accused should be “encountered”. In addition, the victim’s family should be given financial aid.

The officials cleared the blockade after persuading the family. The girl’s father cremated the body at Madapar Ghat at around 6 pm. More than 100 villagers were present during this time. According to the complaint, a BA third-year student from a village in the Chaurichaura area was going to take her exam at a college in Jagdishpur with her cousin on Sunday at 10:40 am.

The police registered a case on the complaint lodged by the victim’s uncle and arrested accused Gulzar Ali alias Rehman Ali. By Monday evening, the police arrested the second accused Salman. The police said that the arrested duo are being questioned.

According to the post-mortem report of the deceased student’s body, the head was fractured due to the car running over her and the ribs were broken causing her death. There were scratch marks on the leg as well.

On Monday, Sarvan Kumar Nishad, the BJP MLA from Chaurichaura met the family of the victims to offer his condolences and give assurance that appropriate action will be taken in the matter. The MLA assured that the victims will be given justice and necessary financial aid. In addition, bulldozer action will also be taken against the accused if required along with action against negligent police officials.

The victim who survived the attack by Gulzar and Salman said that the accused duo had been harassing her for the last one week. The duo used to follow her sometimes in a car or on a bike. She said that Salman and Gulzar used to repeatedly give their phone numbers to the victim and pressurise her to talk to them.

On Sunday the two girls left home to take their exam. About half a kilometre away from the house, both the accused passed by a Magic van. When the girls passed by there, the accused Muslim youths tried to talk to them, and after protesting, they walked ahead. The accused duo then parked their vehicle ahead and started waiting. As soon as the girls passed by there, Salman and Gulzar drove the vehicle over them from behind.

The family members of the student also say that after the incident, the family members of the accused are threatening them. Meanwhile, the incident has infuriated the villagers who demand that the accused Salman and Gulzar be hanged to death.

A CCTV footage of the incident that occurred on Sunday has also been recovered. It shows that the Magic van is coming forward and stopping. The students were moving ahead when the accused suddenly moved the van forward and went ahead at a high speed, crushing the students. It is also seen in the CCTV footage that Gulzar is stopping the vehicle on the road. As soon as the girls came close, Salman took over the wheel from Gulzar. Reports say that Salman is the one who crushed the girls with the vehicle.

How Indian media and ‘liberals’ romanticised UAPA accused: From Campa Cola to mutton, Umar khalid gets celebrity treatment during his one-week bail

On the eve of 28 December, when the world was indulging in Christmas food and waiting for the new year, student activist Umar Khalid came out of prison to spend a week with his family to attend a wedding. Sounds strange, doesn’t it? An accused under the UAPA in the larger conspiracy of the Delhi Riots 2020 getting glittery treatment of words? This is exactly what happened as Khalid spent a week on bail. Though he is back in jail awaiting trial for the case, the way Indian media and “liberals” romanticised it deserves a slow clap, to say the least.

The Indian Express, one of the widely read mainstream newspapers, published a long article explaining what his family said and how Khalid spent his week at home. Titled “When Umar Khalid Came Home,” the piece was authored by Nirbhay Thakur. The feature image showed Khalid and his father, Syed Qasim Rasool Ilyas, a former SIMI operative. Quotes from his parents, his close friend Banojyotsna Lahiri, and others were included in the article in emotional, candid ways.

Source: Banojyotsna Lahiri/Instagram

Lahiri did not miss any opportunity to show “optimism” that Khalid would get bail soon. She told The Indian Express that Khalid thinks “the fake charges against him cannot go on forever.” She added, “We know this will be over soon.”

While Khalid enjoyed home-cooked mutton alongside burgers, pizzas, and cakes brought by his friends, it has been claimed that Ilyas has drawn some “red lines” at home. As he is a critic of the US and Israel, despite Khalid’s love for cold drinks, their fridge was filled only with “Campa Cola,” a cold drink brand recently revived by… drumroll… MUKESH DHIRUBHAI AMBANI!

So, does this mean Khalid’s family has a soft spot for Ambani? The same Ambani who, according to Left-liberals, is a symbol of corporate greed and detrimental to the country? Quite the conundrum, at least for layman (or laypeople?!?!) like us. While the rest of The Indian Express article was filled with setting a narrative that Umar Khalid is an innocent activist who has been jailed without trial due to “politics” or some other reason, many others jumped on the same bandwagon of making him a superstar — the Allu Arjun of liberals.

Source: Indian Express

Before The Indian Express, on the day Khalid was supposed to return to prison, liberals’ favourite comedian, who has a lot of free time on his hands, Kunal Kamra, shared a photo with him on social media. He wrote, “Heart knows no concept of time,” suggesting that even though they had not met for years, Khalid and Kamra were still friends. The post was “loved” by many including actress Richa Chadha who threw a heart in comments and Urfi who liked the post.

Source: Instagram

The photograph with unicorny comments was shared by many media houses including ABP News, Live Mint, Lallantop and many others. These media houses included comments like “This is the best picture of 2025! I hope we see many more” and “So so so heartwarming to see Umar doing normal person things in normal person atmosphere. More photos of Umar please” while addressing Khalid specifically as “activist”. The PR for Khalid runs at its best from time-to-time.

Darab Farooqui, on 4th January, a day after he went back to jail, wrote, “Umar Khalid will inspire generations to come in India.” It is funny how when either he comes out of jail on bail or there is a bail hearing scheduled, many like Darab take on social media to draw a glorious painting of Khalid, as if he is some celebrity fantasy hero imprisoned by an evil demon away in some unknown castle.

Source: X

Anirban Bhattacharya, a student of JNU wrote on Facebook, “It feels like a multiverse. He came for seven days through a portal. And today he was sucked back into it. Back to the monochromatic world of iron bars and grimmer shades. We stay back in the other universe where we dwell in silent complicity as hate-guzzlers roam free. All we have in common on both ends of the portal is the memory of these seven days. Seven days of joy, of well wishers, of catching up, of sharing, of hope, of laughter and lame jokes. And then he goes back wearing a black sweat shirt and an endearing smile. It is them, the dissenters like him, who are the true heroes of this multiverse that is India today. Stay strong Umar!”

Source: Facebook

Umar Khalid and his role in Delhi’s anti-Hindu riots

On 14th September 2020, Umar Khalid, former JNU student and son of an ex-SIMI member was arrested for his role in the Delhi anti-Hindu riots that broke out on the 24th of February. He, along with others, was booked under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act or UAPA and relative provisions of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for being the masterminds of the riots. Umar Khalid, son of Ilyas on the other hand admitted to the Delhi police that he was involved in organizing Muslim groups, instigating them, and preparing for the large-scale violence.

The riot that Khalid and others instigated, claimed 53 lives.

He had mobilized the Muslims to run riots, block roads and harass the public, by asserting that the new law was ‘against Muslims’ and had also planned to involve women and children in the ‘Chakka Jam’ amid the visit of US President Trump to India. He had allegedly met the former AAP Councillor Tahir Hussain and another accused Khalid Saifi to assure logistical support during the riots through his contacts in the PFI. According to the reports, the agencies have been watching and warning about the nexus between Maoists whose front organization Khalid is aligned with, and hardline Islamists allegedly represented by Jamaat-e-Islami Hind, Welfare Party of India, and banned outfit SIMI. He had also repeated Pakistani talking points in Kashmir and claimed that the Indian Union territory was occupied by Indian forces.

The romanticisation of Umar Khalid by parts of the media and some “liberals” raises serious concerns. Despite facing charges under UAPA for his role in anti-Hindu riots, he is portrayed as a victim or even a hero. Glowing articles and celebrity endorsements ignore the seriousness of his actions. This selective sympathy undermines justice and sets a dangerous trend. It’s worth asking if such glorification helps justice or just fuels a biased narrative.

Waqf has claims in Sambhal greater than the total area of the city, Report exposes shocking details

Amidst the ongoing Jama Masjid-Harihar Temple dispute in Uttar Pradesh’s Sambhal, a shocking revelation has been made about the Waqf Board’s land claims in the city. It has been reported that the Waqf Board has apparently laid claim on more than the entire city of Sambhal. 20 Waqf properties are being reported in Sambhal city. While the city’s total area is just 5 square kilometres, Waqf Board’s properties were found to be in more than 7 square kilometres.

Dainik Bhaskar reported that the shocking details emerged after District Magistrate Rajendra Pensia ordered an inspection of the relevant documents. Following this, a complaint has been lodged for making forged documents. The DM has also ordered an investigation into the matter. Meanwhile, Sambhal Police has registered an FIR based on the complaint lodged.

On 31st December 2024, a delegation of the Samajwadi Party led by Leader of Opposition Mata Prasad Pandey went to Sambhal. The delegation provided the documents of Waqf property to DM Rajendra Pensia. It was claimed in these documents that the land on which the police post is being constructed in front of Jama Masjid belongs to Waqf. In addition to this, there are 20 Waqf properties in Sambhal city.

According to these documents, the area of ​​Sambhal police station, district hospital, tehsil, municipality, and post office also comes under the Waqf property area. Even the ancient Kalki temple which is mentioned in the Hindu scriptures is also a part of the Waqf as per these submitted documents.

Notably, Sambhal Police Station’s construction year is documented as 1905. In the papers, that land is shown to have been given to the Waqf in 1929. Not only this, the Satyavrat Police Chowki which is being built in front of Jama Masjid, has also been declared as Waqf property by All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) leader Asaduddin Owaisi, Dainik Bhaskar reported.

Meanwhile, DM Rajendra Pensia has outrightly refuted the claims made by the Waqf Board and said that if the Waqf Board’s claims are factual, the person who gave the land to Waqf should come forward. DM Pensia said that he formed a 3-member committee and got the Waqf documents investigated. The committee comprised SDM, CO and Nagar Palika EO. The investigation revealed that Waqfnama was not registered.

“To date, no one has ownership rights on this land. It is written in the Waqfnama that Abdul Samad has given this property for building a madrasa. But it is not written anywhere where this madrasa will be built,” the DM said adding that there is no information about Abdul Samad or his heirs and that if the documents are correct Abdul Samad or his heirs should come to the administration with original documents.

Speaking about why the Waqfnama of the said properties is fake, DM Pensia said “A total of 20 properties have been shown in the Waqfnama, their boundaries (boundary walls) are not in that map. It is only mentioned that there is Waqf land in all four directions one kilometre from the mid-center. But, it is not told which is the mid-center. How will it be clear from this which is the Waqf land and till where is its boundary? The city of Sambhal is spread over a total area of ​​5 square kilometres, whereas the area of ​​these 20 properties alone is more than that. This seems impossible.”

Karnataka: Waqf Board lays claim to 70 heritage sites, including Tipu Armoury, ASI building, and govt lands in Srirangapatna

Months after outrage over the Waqf Board swallowing over 1,200 acres of farmland in Vijaypura, Karnataka, a similar kind of stunning claim is made for the government properties in the historic town of Srirangapatna, a report published in Star Of Mysore said.

More than 70 properties in Srirangapatna taluk, including government-owned lands, historic monuments like the iconic Tipu Armoury, and buildings under the jurisdiction of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) and the State Department of Archaeology, Museums, and Heritage, have been recorded as Waqf Board properties in official RTC (Record of Rights, Tenancy, and Crops) documents, the report said.

Interestingly, even the Department of Archaeology, Museums, and Heritage building — the Sri Chamarajendra Memorial Government Museum in Srirangapatna — has been listed as Waqf property. Besides, several agricultural plots owned by farmers in Srirangapatna town and taluk have also been listed as properties belonging to the Karnataka State Waqf Board, sparking concerns among farmers.

In addition to this, the Waqf Board has also laid claim to the Chikkamma Chikkadevi Temple in Mahadevpura village and a government school in Chandagalu village, not only raising eyebrows but also triggering serious discussions about how to tackle the menace.

The claims over heritage sites and government lands come months after farmers in Vijaypura, Karnataka, received notices stating that their lands belonged to the Waqf board. The controversy concerned 1,200 acres in Honwada village, Tikota taluk, with farmers claiming that officials were attempting to designate the area as the Shah Aminuddin Dargah, a religious institution.

“The notice claimed that the land belonged to Shah Aminuddin Dargah, but this dargah hasn’t existed for centuries, and our families have owned this land for generations. Around 41 farmers have received notices, asking them to provide ownership records, but we are the rightful owners. If the government doesn’t withdraw these notices, we will launch a massive protest,” Suneel Shankarappa Tudigal, vice president of Honwada gram panchayat, had said.

Following outrage by farmers, the Karnataka government was forced to write to all Regional Commissioners and District Commissioners related to the Waqf issue.

The letter warned of disciplinary action against officials, who alter land mutation records and issue eviction notices to farmers under the Waqf Act.

The order issued on November 9 asked to withdraw all notices served to farmers and to immediately take back the land mutation orders served by any authority and also to stop mutation work.

Bangladesh: How Muhammad Yunus is pandering to Sheikh Hasina’s rival BNP, one step at a time

Muhammad Yunus, the chief advisor of the interim government of Bangladesh, has been furthering the agenda of Sheikh Hasina’s rival Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP).

Following the fall of Dhaka on 5th August 2024, the Chairperson of BNP Begum Khaleda Zia was released from prison.

Until then, she was in jail for embezzling $250,000 in donations meant for an orphanage. Yunus welcomed her warmly in November last year during the Bangladesh Armed Forces Day.

“Khaleda Zia, the wife of martyred President Ziaur Rahman, has come here. She did not get a chance to attend the event for almost a decade. We are proud to offer this opportunity to her,” he was heard saying.

One of BNP’s major allies happens to be Jamaat-e-Islami (JeI). Muhammad Yunus saw to it that the ban on the radical Islamic outfit and its student wing Islami Chhatra Shibir was lifted within days of coming to power.

Recently, he tried to re-invent the history of Bangladesh’s Independence movement to remain in the good books of the BNP.

The Yunus regime has introduced new textbooks for primary and secondary students which falsely claim that the first declaration of independence of Bangladesh was made by Ziaur Rehman, the founder of BNP.

The ‘Nobel laureate’ has made it clear that he is willing to distort the nation’s history to forge strong ties with the Bangladesh Nationalist Party.

The BNP is now pressing the Yunus regime to create a ‘conducive environment’ for the safe return of Tarique Rehman to Bangladesh.

For the unversed, Tarique Rehman is the son of Khaleda Zia and Ziaur Rehman. He has been the acting chairman of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party since 2018. He has been living in ‘self-exile’ in London for 17 years.

OpIndia reported on 4th August 2024 about the involvement of Tarique Rehman in the so-called student protests, which ultimately led to the undemocratic ouster of Sheikh Hasina.

Our sources in Dhaka have told us that Tarique Rehman will soon return to Bangladesh.

By facilitating the end of Tarique’s self-exile, the release of Khaleda Zia and the glorification of Ziaur Rehman, Muhammad Yunus is making the path clear for the revival of the BNP in the mainstream politics of Bangladesh.

The Islamist party, which was shoved into a corner during Sheikh Hasina’s tenure, is now strategically gaining ground in the country.

BNP leaders and Muhammad Yunus are ‘natural allies’

Muhammad Yunus and the Bangladesh Nationalist Party are united through their common dislike for Sheikh Hasina and the Awami League.

After Hasina fled Bangladesh, Yunus described the moment as ‘Second Liberation Day.’ BNP Chairperson Khaleda Zia had also hailed ‘brave children’ for their struggle that made the ‘impossible possible.’

Both the BNP and Yunus regime did not hold back from making their anti-India agenda clear. Prior to Hasina’s ouster, BNP was openly supporting the boycott of Indian goods and products.

Although Yunus couldn’t afford to openly endorse the ‘India Out’ campaign, he tried to temporarily placate the anti-India Islamists by not exporting Hilsa fish to India.

When Khaleda Zia was politically active, she would openly support insurgents in India’s North East by hailing them as ‘freedom fighters.’

Her anti-India sentiment was recently echoed by one of the advisors of the Yunus regime, Mahfuz Alam.

BNP has always promoted a ‘Bangladeshi identity’ based on Islam. Its politics centred around the majoritarian form of Islamic nationalism that had no place for Hindus and other religious minorities in the story of Bangladesh.

The party had also been involved in anti-Hindu atrocities. While Yunus has not directed Muslim mobs to run rampage, he has strategically remained tight-lipped on their activities.

His regime has released Islamic hardliners and convicted terrorists and tried to downplay attacks on Hindu minorities as ‘fake‘, ‘exaggerated‘ or ‘politically motivated‘.

The smokescreen of BNP-Yunus friction

There have been a few issues over which the Bangladesh Nationalist Party has publicly expressed a difference of opinion with the interim government led by Muhammad Yunus.

For instance, the BNP opposed the proposal of the interim government to ban the Awami League. Party’s secretary general Mirza Fakrul Islam had said, “Unlike Sheikh Hasina and the Awami League, we don’t believe in the politics of banning a political party to settle scores.

One of the public grievances against the Hasina regime was her alleged ‘undemocratic’ ways of running the government. The BNP, in its pursuit of winning over people, was trying to position itself as a democratic alternative to the Awami League.

It is with that motive in mind that the Islamist party opposed the ban on Awami League, knowing well that the latter would not be able to put up a fight in the absence of Sheikh Hasina.

Another bone of contention between the BNP and the Yunus regime was over the suggestion by the latter to reduce the minimum age for voting to 17 years. This has the potential to delay the national election process.

These issues are trivial at best in the background of the ideological similarity between the Yunus regime and the Bangladesh Nationalist Party.

According to our sources in Dhaka, BNP leaders and advisors to the interim government of Bangladesh are ironing out their differences through back-door meetings to ensure public spat in future.

Yunus has so far venerated both Khaleda Zia and BNP founder Ziaur Rehman.

It now remains to be seen how the political dynamics change with the potential arrival of Tarique Rehman in Bangladesh and the announcement of national elections in the near future.

Chhattisgarh journalist murder: How media tried to hide main accused Suresh Chandrakar’s links to Congress

28-year-old journalist Mukesh Chandrakar, who ran a YouTube channel called Bastar Junction in Chhattisgarh, had been missing since 1st January. Notably, his investigative work had revealed financial discrepancies amounting to Rs 120 crore in a road project within the Bastar region, an area known for its Maoist insurgency, which led to the initiation of a government inquiry.

After his elder brother Yukesh Chandrakar raised the alarm, police discovered his body in a septic tank in the compound of Congress leader Suresh Chandrakar’s residential premises in Chhatanpara Basti of Bijapur. The tank had been freshly sealed with a concrete slab. The authorities suspect his murder is linked to this expose.

Meanwhile, Suresh Chandrakar who is also the victim’s cousin and a prime accused in the case was arrested on 5th January in relation to the murder after his brothers Ritesh Chandrakar and Dinesh Chandrakar were apprehended a day earlier. According to the police, Ritesh committed the crime with the aid of construction supervisor Mahendra and he further sought the assistance of his brothers in the disposal of the body.

“Ritesh was angry that despite being brothers, Mukesh was interfering in their work. This led to a heated argument,” a senior officer informed. “Ritesh was arrested in Raipur, while Dinesh and Mahendra were detained in Bijapur,” police stated. Suresh was hiding at his driver’s home in Hyderabad and was nabbed by a Special Investigation Team (SIT) of the Chhattisgarh police from there. The police reviewed footage from 200 CCTV systems and tracked approximately 300 mobile numbers to track him.

Notably, the post mortem report of the deceased disclosed the severity of the brutality inflicted upon him. The doctors who performed the autopsy found four fragments of liver, five fractured ribs, 15 cranial fractures, a broken neck, and the heart ripped out. They remarked that they had never encountered a case of this nature in their 12 years of practice. According to them, the number of people involved in the murder must have been more than two people.

According to reports, the events unfolded on the evening of 1st January, approximately at 8 pm, when Mukesh received a call from Ritesh, asking him to join him for dinner at the farmhouse located in Chhatanpara Basti. The latter then voiced his discontent and criticized Mukesh for reporting on a road construction corruption case, despite their familial ties. The report addressed a scam related to road construction, implicating the Chandrakars as the contractors involved.

Mukesh, recognized for his courageous journalism in the conflict-ridden area, made significant contributions to various prominent television networks, including NDTV. A confrontation ensued between the two sides which soon turned into assault and Mukesh was struck several times with an iron rod, ultimately leading to his demise. At a recent press conference, Chhattisgarh Home Minister Sharma indicated that on 25th December, Mukesh had brought attention to substandard road construction, prompting the government to order a probe which upset Suresh who was one of the contractors.

An initial inquiry reportedly indicated that Ritesh along with Mahendra, assaulted Mukesh using an iron rod, resulting in his immediate death following a dispute that arose during dinner. Subsequently, the two concealed the body within a septic tank, sealing it with cement to hide their heinous act. They also discarded both his mobile phone and the iron rod utilized in the attack. Moreover, Dinesh oversaw the cementing of the tank, while Suresh was the mastermind behind the plan.

“In the aftermath of the murder, Chief Minister Vishnudev Sai decided to send a strong message against crime and criminals in the state. It was on his directive that the administration demolished a road construction plant of the main accused,” a senior official from the Chhattisgarh government conveyed. A high-ranking official from the district administration stated that the demolished property was owned by Suresh Chandrakar, who is involved in multiple road construction initiatives and holds tenders for three separate road projects.

The official added, “The razed property was a construction yard and was made by encroaching on forest land. The place was used to make materials used in road construction work. The property was spread across over 3 acres. There were several vehicles, sheds, hardware materials and a hot mix plant. It’s a joint action taken by forest and revenue officials. We are checking if he has more illegal property. We have frozen three of his bank accounts.”

Mukesh was instrumental in facilitating the release of a the Commando Battalion for Resolute Action (CoBRA) commando who had been taken hostage by Maoists following the Tekulguda massacre in April 2021, an incident that claimed the lives of 29 security personnel. He operated as a freelancer, partnering with media outlets like NDTV and News 18, while also managing a YouTube channel called Bastar Junction, which boasts a subscriber count of more than 171K.

Media downplays Suresh Chandrakar’s connection to Congress

As the details of the horrific murder continue to emerge and the state government acts against the perpetrators, the Indian media is focused on downplaying the profound connection between Suresh Chandrakar and Congress. The prominent media outlets, such as The Times of India, The Hindu, NDTV and The Indian Express, among others notably omitted the fact that Suresh, the primary suspect, is also affiliated with the Congress party. He is identified as a contractor and even as a cousin, yet his significant political identity remained unaddressed. If one were to trust the mainstream media, it would seem that he possesses no political relationship with the Congress.

None of the aforementioned news articles included the term Congress in their coverage, nor did they reference the party in connection with Suresh, as if it were non-existent. On the other hand, others dismissed his associations as a mere claim put forth by the Bharatiya Janata Party, lacking any substantial evidence. They attempted to depict it as a political smear campaign between Congress and the BJP.

According to the Hindustan Times, the Bharatiya Janata Party’s claims about Suresh’s ties to the grand old party were described as simply allegations. The report included statements from Deputy Chief Minister Vijay Sharma, who confirmed that Suresh had been a leader and office bearer within Congress, however, it added a country from Congress leader Sushil Anand Shukla who denied this assertion, stating that he had joined the ruling party. A simple verification of the facts could have clarified the truth, however, the media organization opted to counterbalance instead.

Likewise, Outlook stated, “Chhattisgarh Deputy Chief Minister Vijay Sharma claimed that Suresh Chandrakar was a Congress leader, while the opposition alleged that he had recently joined the ruling BJP,” in yet another attempt to undermine the truth that lies beneath the facade of political allegations.

The Indian media, known for its tendency to defend the Congress party and its integral role within its ecosystem, chose to highlight every trivial detail of the case, overlooking the most critical element, Suresh’s political background, due to obvious motivations.

Congress-Suresh relationship

While the mainstream media might have sought to conceal the crucial link between Suresh and the Congress, OpIndia already brought this relationship to light, in an earlier report. A visit to his social media profiles uncovered various posts that established his ties to the Congress party. One significant Facebook post, dated 5th June 2019, showcased him adorned in a Congress scarf, alongside other party leaders, including Bhupesh Baghel, who was the Chief Minister of Chhattisgarh at that time, in a poster.

Suresh Chandrakar proudly shared his courtesy meeting with Deepak Baij, the head of the Chhattisgarh Pradesh Congress Committee, in another post.

The Congress party contended that Suresh, had left the party to join the BJP, in light of the controversy. Nevertheless, a report from Amar Ujala, dated 11th November 2024, which he posted on his Facebook page, challenged this claim. It revealed that Suresh Chandrakar, serving as the State Vice President of the Chhattisgarh Pradesh Congress SC (Schedule Caste) Cell, was appointed as the observer for the Navapur assembly constituency during the Maharashtra assembly election.

Suresh consistently shared evidence of his connections to the Congress party on his social media platforms. However, the Indian media consciously decided not to explore the issue, thereby neglecting to inform its audience the complete truth. Interestingly, the same privilege is not extended to the saffron party. Notably, the Congress party is also trying to allege that he is no longer a member, however, the compelling evidence contradicts this claim.

Home Minister Amit Shah launches BHARATPOL portal, national investigative authorities and state police can now connect to Interpol

Union Home Minister and Minister of Cooperation Amit Shah on Tuesday launched the BHARATPOL portal in the national capital and said that this initiative will take our country’s international investigations to a new level in the coming days.

“Bharatpol will take our country’s international investigations to a new era. The CBI was the only agency identified to work with Interpol, but with the launch of Bharatpol, every Indian agency and all state police forces will easily be able to connect with Interpol,” Shah said.

This portal will streamline all requests for international assistance through Interpol, including the issuance of Red Notices and other color-coded Interpol notices.

Home Minister Amit Shah praised the BHARATPOL portal, saying that through this, our country’s police departments will study and analyze various types of global crimes, enabling us to create a framework to prevent these crimes before they occur in our country.

“Through this, we will be able to bridge many gaps, obtain a lot of information, and, with precision, analyze various types of global crimes, enabling us to create a framework to prevent these crimes before they occur in our country,” he said.

He added, “With BHARATPOL, every agency and state police force in the country will be able to connect with Interpol to expedite their investigations.”

Amit Shah also said that BHARATPOL will facilitate not only the locating of criminals but will also help establish a system to locate international criminals in our country too.

“Through BHARATPOL, we will be able to locate our criminals and also establish a streamlined system to locate criminals from around the world in India. Additionally, with references from Interpol, covering 195 countries, providing and receiving international assistance for investigations through the Interpol channel will become much easier,” Home Minister Shah said.

At the event, Shah also presented Police Medals to 35 CBI officers/officials, who have been awarded the President’s Police Medal for Distinguished Service and Uthe nion Home Minister’s Medal for Excellence in Investigation.


(This news report is published from a syndicated feed. Except for the headline, the content has not been written or edited by OpIndia staff)

Myanmar: As drone attack hits Hindu Temple and leaves 7 dead, read about plight of Hindus targeted by both military junta and Islamists

The conflict in Myanmar, which significantly escalated following the military coup in February 2021, is now entering its fourth year. The current situation is marked by rampant violence, a grave humanitarian crisis, and a sharp declining economy while the country experience profound instability.

The transition to military rule has encountered persistent resistance from armed groups and civilian networks. The recent surge in violence has resulted in nearly 3.5 million individuals being displaced within a single year.

The nation is currently confronted with significant challenges from various fronts which has exacerbated the hardships and persecution endured by its minorities, especially the dwindling Hindu population. The plight of Hindus in the country is only increasing with each passing day. On 31st December, a drone strike conducted by military junta targeted a Hindu temple in Phyu Township of Taungoo District in Bago Region, resulting in the deaths of seven civilians and wounding seven others, as reported by an official from the Phyu Township People’s Defense Force (PDF).

The incident transpired after several days of conflict in the vicinity of Zeyawadi town within Phyu Township, where hostilities between junta forces and resistance groups had been ongoing since 27th December. The PDF indicated that 19 junta soldiers lost their lives during these clashes. The drone attack specifically struck the temple situated in Ram Nagar village, within the Amae Khaung Village Tract, an area that had not previously experienced any fighting, according to the PDF representative.

An official stated, “This was a public area where Hindus live and worship. The junta dropped the first bomb by drone, and as people rushed to aid the injured, a second bomb was dropped, killing seven civilians on the spot.” Other reports said that the army conducted airstrikes and a drone assault in a minimum of five locations across the country during New Year’s Eve and New Year’s Day and claimed the lives of at least 20 persons, including those who died in the temple attack.

The Myanmar Hindu Union issued a statement on 1st January and said that the junta forces intentionally targeted a civilian region. The organization characterized the assault as a severe infringement of human rights and international humanitarian law, labeling it an act of inhumanity. The declaration called upon human rights organizations, the international community, and global religious leaders to take decisive action against the junta, highlighting the necessity of holding it responsible for the violations against religious and ethnic minorities.

Meanwhile, Major General Alok Deb, former deputy director general of the Institute of Defense Studies and Analysis expressed, “One can only wait and watch to understand why this happened. This could have been a collateral damage inflicted in a war zone, but one is also reminded that the Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA) had in 2017 massacred some 99 Hindus in Rakhine state.”

During the attacks on Hindu villagers, the ARSA reportedly asserted that they regarded the unarmed Hindu minority and the Arakanese or Rakhine population as “the same.” It consistently alleged that few Rohingya Islamist factions, some of which are believed to operate from Bangladesh, have engaged in combat against them on behalf of the Myanmar army, executing numerous terror strikes targeting civilians.

A small community of Hindus lives in Rakhine and other regions of Myanmar. The volatile Rakhine province of Myanmar shares its southern border with areas predominantly inhabited by the Burman majority, while to the north, it adjoins Bangladesh’s Cox Bazaar and Mizoram in India. The majority of Rohingya Muslims crossed over to Bangladesh, however, a large number have infiltrated India as well along with Arakanese (referred to as Marma) and Zo.

The Hindu community residing in Rakhine has largely refrained from participating in the conflict. However, analysts have pointed out the army’s documented history of human rights violations. Reports from human rights organizations released last year disclosed that churches, Buddhist temples, and monasteries have been consistently struck by the Myanmar Air Force, while civilians have been subjected to massacres by the military amid the ongoing warfare.

Regular attacks on Hindus in Myanmar

A Rohingya armed faction, equipped with guns and swords, is accused of at least one, and possibly a second, massacre that took the lives of up to 99 Hindu men, women, and children, in addition to other unlawful killings and the abduction of Hindu villagers in August 2017, confirmed Amnesty International. The Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA) wanted to instill fear among Hindus and other ethnic groups through these violent acts. The incident received significant global attention and brought the atrocities against Myanmar’s Hindu community to the forefront.

On the morning of 25th August 2017, at approximately 8 am, ARSA launched an attack on the Hindu community residing in the village of Ah Nauk Kha Maung Seik, part of a group of villages referred to as Kha Maung Seik in northern Maungdaw Township. Armed individuals clad in black, along with local Rohingya villagers in civilian attire, targeted numerous Hindu women, men and kids. They proceeded to rob, restrain and blindfold the victims before escorting them to the hamlet’s outskirts, where they separated the men from the women and children. A few hours later, the terrorists executed 53 of the Hindus in a systematic manner.

Eight Hindu women and eight children were taken captive but spared after the assailants compelled them to consent to “conversion” to Islam. They were subsequently forced to escape with the terrorists to Bangladesh several days later, before being repatriated to Myanmar in October 2017 with the assistance of both Bangladeshi and Myanmar authorities.

Afterward, their condition deteriorated further as both the junta and the radicals targeted the marginalized community amidst the prevailing conflict. The unrest turned even more communal, with reports revealing that close to 5,000 houses owned by Buddhists and Hindus were burned in Buthidaung, a location just 25 kilometers from the Bangladesh border. The occurrence took place between 11th and 21st April, last year.

“These 5,000 houses were targeted as they belonged to Buddhists and Hindus. Most people had fled to safer zones so many houses were empty, but those who were left behind were pulled out and their houses looted and burnt in front of their eyes. Conscripts who include young boys from Rohingya camps in Bangladesh are being used for this exercise,” a source unveiled and added, “In 2018 census there were 3000 houses in Buthidaung. This number has increased more than threefold to 10000 as many people fled their homes from other areas to settle here. Over 50 per cent of residents are Muslims while the remaining are ethnic groups (Buddhists, Hindus).”

During the same month, a group of Hindus and Buddhists was taken hostage by Rohingya terror groups in Buthiduang, located in the Arakan state of Myanmar’s Rakhine region. A source conveyed, “With unrest and instability expanding to Buthidaung, the volatility has taken a new turn with Islamic terror groups working on behest of the military to kill and terrorise ethnic groups on the basis of religion. There are over 1600 Hindus and over 120 Buddhists who have been held hostage by them there at present.”

“Myanmar’s military regime provided basic military training to members of the Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA) and Arakan Rohingya Army (ARA) to fight against the AA (Arakan Army),” the source highlighted as outbreak of riots driven by religious and ethnic divisions forced Hindus and other minority groups to escape in search of safety.

During May 2024, the Hindu and Rakhine populations found themselves confined in Buthidaung town due to severe clashes. A source mentioned, “The battles are intensifying on the ground in Buthidaung. Over 1,500 Hindus and 20 Rakhines are being prevented from leaving as the situation is unsafe there. Rohingyas are being trained as conscripts and they are being made to target people based on their religion and ethnicity.”

A joint letter was sent by two civil society organizations in Myanmar to the President and Prime Minister of India, in October 2024, urging prompt action in response to the “escalating difficulties” faced by Hindus in the neighbouring country. Their appeal included a call for the re-evaluation of the Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) regulations to encompass Hindus from Myanmar.

Alongside President Droupadi Murmu, the Myanmar Hindu Union (MHU) and India for Myanmar (IFM) communicated a letter dated 22nd August 2024, to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the Indian ministries of External Affairs, Home and Defence. These organizations were established in 2021 in the aftermath of the coup and are dedicated to backing the National Unity Government (NUG), which operates in exile as a counter to the Myanmar military.

They requested, “As Hindus from Myanmar, we were born and bred in the country, but according to the Myanmar 1982 Citizenship Law, we are made to feel like aliens and second-class citizens. Furthermore, India’s OCI policy does not allow Hindus from Myanmar to become OCI holders. We urge the Indian government to reassess the OCI policy and include Hindus from Myanmar as eligible for this status, recognizing our historical and cultural connections to India.”

The Arakan Army, which gained control of nearly all of Rakhine state while countering the junta-led forces, also acknowledged the immeasurable sufferings experienced by Hindus and others, in December of last year. According to the outfit, terrorist factions were perpetrating violent acts near the Bangladesh border. Additionally, it suggested that a relationship has developed between the military junta and some of these radical groups.

A source from Arakan stated, “There are nearly 11 militant groups operating out of Rohingya refugee camps in Bangladesh which include the Rohingya Solidarity Organisation (RSO), Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA), Arakan Rohingya Army (ARA). Hundreds of people have died due to their atrocities: killings, rapes, kidnappings and other kinds of torture.” Maungdaw and Buthidaung towns were most susceptible to such risk.

There were allegations that the RSO has ties with Al-Qaeda and Jamaat-e-Islami. A report by the Global Arakan Network (GAN) asserted that Islamists took advantage of the Muslim population in Maungdaw, using them as human shields and inciting them to combat the non-Muslim demographic, which included Buddhists and Hindus. The terrorists reportedly enlisted young orphans, some as young as six years old, from Rohingya camps in Bangladesh, with the intention of training them to engage in combat once they reach their teenage years.

The Arakan Army contended that Bangladesh allowed and neglected the rapid growth of these groups in its refugee camps. “Bangladesh’s support, both tacit and overt for Rohingya armed actors has facilitated the rise of militant groups at the expense of the moderate, non-violent Rohingya leadership.” There has been a surge in the actions of extremists factions targeting the local communities in the Rakhine region in the wake of the political turmoil in Bangladesh. Furthermore, there are allegations that the interim government led by Muhammad Yunus has been aiding them. Rakhine state shares a border of 270 kilometres with the country.

It is unsurprising that the new government of Bangladesh, which is complicit in brutal assaults on Hindus by in Bangladesh would intend to replicate the same against the Hindus of Myanmar. Bangladesh has experienced over 2,000 instances of violence, the majority of which have specifically targeted the minority Hindu community. The Hindus in Myanmar face a similarly bleak future, as they are oppressed by both the government and Islamist outfits.

Meanwhile, as Hindus in Myanmar are left to fend for themselves, the Rohingya Muslims have unlawfully relocated to India, where they exploit its resources and create more national security risks for the nation.

‘Hindu temples are built over Jain and Buddhist shrines’: Dushyant Dave quotes dubious self-proclaimed historian to target Hindus

On 1st January, Times Now’s Group Editor Navika Kumar hosted a discussion with former Chief Justice of India, UU Lalit, and Senior Advocate Dushyant Dave, revolving around the notion of whether the Constitution of India and democracy are under threat. The debate touched on several topics, including constitutional inclusivity, justice, and equality; however, it was Dave’s comments on Hindu temples and history that sparked controversy on social media.

During the conversation, Dave quoted dubious self-proclaimed historian Devdutt Pattanaik and claimed that Hindu temples were often built over Jain and Buddhist temples. The assertion was made while discussing religious and historical tensions prevailing because of petitions filed in different courts over conflicts arising from interpretations of the Places of Worship Act. Dave claimed that such issues are merely distractions and insisted that people and governments should focus on modern problems like poverty and unemployment. However, in doing so, he echoed claims familiar with Marxist rhetoric aimed at undermining Hindu traditions.

Dushyant Dave remarked, “I have no doubt that every Islamic monument perhaps was built on a Hindu temple, but then every Hindu temple was built on a Jain temple or a Buddhist temple, as Devdutt Pattanaik rightly points out. Are we going to start digging all this? Should we dig up the Taj Mahal or Red Fort? We don’t need it. This country has a larger role to play in the world, which is being derailed by such distractions.”

The temple narrative – Dave’s claim versus historical evidence

What Dave asserted, while referring to Pattanaik’s rhetoric, is a deeply flawed narrative often used to discredit Hindu history. The idea that Hindu temples were constructed over Jain and Buddhist sites lacks historical grounding. It mostly relies on ideological bias rather than evidence.

In fact, this rhetoric is not new. In 1986, Marxist historians like Romila Thapar dismissed reports about the Islamic destruction of Hindu temples, claiming it was a “communal” notion. They countered the facts of Islamic invasions and destruction with baseless claims about Hindu desecration of Buddhist and Jain sites. However, the claims, which lacked scholarly evidence, were demolished by historian Sita Ram Goel.

Goel sent a detailed questionnaire to historians like Thapar and demanded concrete proof of such claims. He asked for inscriptions, Hindu scriptures, or records of rulers celebrated for such acts. In return, he received only silence from the Marxist historians, and this silence has persisted for decades.

Goel, during his research, established that Hindu kings, while often reconstructing or renovating temples, did not engage in the widespread destruction suggested by Marxist historians as part of their propaganda against Hinduism or Sanatan Dharma. On the other hand, Islamic conquests left clear records of temple destruction. In fact, there is no documentation that exists for the so-called destruction carried out by Hindu rulers. Goel also highlighted how these baseless claims created psychological pressure by portraying Hindus as intolerant to avoid being labelled “communal”.

Dave, in his assertion, heavily relied on Pattanaik, who has a long history of distorting Hindu traditions and peddling false claims. He lacks credibility and mirrors the long-standing tactic of ideological intimidation by Marxist liberals. Interestingly, when someone counters Pattanaik on his claims on social media, he often replies with abuse or blocks the person instead of providing any proof for whatever fiction he presents in the name of “history”, or in his own words, “mythology”.

If such accusations were based on genuine evidence, they would withstand scrutiny—but decades of silence from their proponents suggest otherwise.

The broader debate – inclusivity, reservation, and governance

A major part of the discussion, however, revolved around inclusivity, reservation, and governance among other topics. Former CJI UU Lalit celebrated India’s journey towards inclusivity and said, “The Constitution has expanded its reach to uplift marginalised sections of society, from Scheduled Castes and Tribes to women and economically weaker sections. We are moving in the right direction.” He highlighted landmark constitutional amendments, such as the 73rd and 74th, which brought women into the democratic framework at the grassroots level, and newer provisions aimed at increasing their representation in legislatures.

However, Dave did not agree with him, stating that despite the measures taken in the past few decades, the reality is bleak. He gave the example of the government providing free grains to 85 crore people to support his argument. He said, “Can we call this progress when such large sections of society remain impoverished?”

Uniform civil code – an elusive reform?

While Justice Lalit supported the idea of a Uniform Civil Code, asserting it aligns with Article 14’s principle of equality, Dave expressed doubts about the feasibility of the UCC in the current political climate. He said, “The UCC has often been weaponised as a political tool rather than pursued as a genuine reform. It risks becoming more divisive than unifying if approached insensitively.”

Judiciary and justice delivery – an unfulfilled promise

Discussing the judiciary’s role, Justice Lalit emphasised its importance as a safeguard for citizens, stating, “The courts remain the ultimate refuge for those seeking justice. Even when errors occur, the judiciary has mechanisms to correct them.” Dave, however, criticised systemic inefficiencies, pointing out, “With over five crore cases pending, justice delayed is justice denied.” He accused the judiciary of being silent on alleged “human rights violations”.

Reservation versus merit

Justice Lalit acknowledged the need for affirmative action but stressed balance, saying, “Affirmative action must continue until marginalised communities achieve parity. However, integrating economic criteria into the framework can ensure fairness for all.”

However, Dave repeated the same “5,000 years of oppression” argument, claiming the marginalised communities were denied dignity and are still being denied the same. He asserted, “Reservations are not a favour—they are a necessity for justice. Yet, we turn a blind eye to the privileges of the wealthy, particularly in private institutions.”

Conclusion

Dave’s claim that Hindu temples were built over Jain and Buddhist sites, quoting Devdutt Pattanaik, is yet another example of Marxist propaganda aimed at undermining Hindu heritage. No credible evidence supports this narrative, as shown by historian Sita Ram Goel’s detailed research. Unlike the well-documented destruction of Hindu temples during Islamic invasions, there is no record of systematic destruction by Hindu rulers. By repeating such baseless claims, Dave distorted history and unfairly targeted Hindus while ignoring proven facts.