Home Blog Page 772

USCIRF, headed by Pakistan origin commissioner tarnishes India and Hindus with half-truth and full-lies yet again: Dubious data, missing Hindu victims, terrorists branded activists and more

On the 2nd of October 2024, the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) published yet another report to demonise India and Hindus, with fantastical tales of Muslim and Christian persecution in India based on dubious data sets and misinformation. The USCIRF is a US Federal Government Commission with the commissioners appointed by the President of the US. The USCIRF reports on India are largely seen as an effort to interfere in India’s internal matters by the US government and the deep state. It is pertinent to note that the Commissioner of USCIRF is an ‘activist’ of Pakistani origin who is deeply prejudiced against India and Hindus.

The USCIRF website about their India reports says, “This report highlights how throughout 2024, individuals have been killed, beaten, and lynched by vigilante groups, religious leaders have been arbitrarily arrested, and homes and places of worship have been demolished. These events constitute particularly severe violations of religious freedom. It describes the use of misinformation and disinformation, including hate speech, by government officials to incite violent attacks against religious minorities and their places of worship. It further describes changes to and enforcement of India’s legal framework to target and disenfranchise religious minorities, including the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), a Uniform Civil Code (UCC) and several state-level anti-conversion and cow slaughter laws”.  

Saying thus, the report recommends that India be declared a ‘country of particular concern’ for religious persecution.

The section on India, written by ‘senior policy analyst’ Sema Hasan, also claims that government officials use misinformation and disinformation, including hate speech, to ‘encourage’ violent attacks on religious minorities and their places of worship. 

“This article details how vigilante gangs killed, assaulted, and lynched people throughout 2024, jailed religious leaders, and destroyed houses and places of worship. These events constitute particularly severe violations of religious freedom,” the report said. However, it selectively reported such incidents and stated that the state deliberately provoked violence in several parts of the country using misinformation and disinformation. 

The report further selectively discusses modifications to and enforcement of India’s legal system that according to the organization targets and disenfranchises religious minorities, such as the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), a Uniform Civil Code (UCC), and many state-level anti-conversion and cow slaughter legislation.

“Religious freedom conditions in India have continued to worsen throughout 2024, particularly in the months before and immediately following the country’s national elections. In addition to the enforcement of discriminatory state-level legislation and propagation of hateful rhetoric, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government made a concerted effort to implement election promises that negatively and disproportionately impacted religious minorities and their ability to practice their faith. Such promises included enacting the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), inaugurating the Ram Temple in Ayodhya, and introducing a national code to replace religion-specific personal laws. Each action was justified by government officials as necessary to protect India’s cultural [and] linguistic heritage- a common euphemism for Hindu supremacy, often at the expense of religious minorities,” the report read.

The report criticizes the Centre for implementing CAA

The biased report on religious freedom in India mentions the implementation of the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) by the Indian government in May 2024 as one of the markers of religious rights being compromised, even though the Act has nothing to do with Indian citizens – regardless of religious identity. The report says that several states and communities have opposed the bill. The report implied that the centre implemented the law as a part of BJP’s long-anticipated campaign promise and that it targeted only the Muslim community in India.

It is crucial to note that Islamists hatched a conspiracy to create massive riots in the city of Delhi specifically targeting the Hindus of the area under the garb of opposing CAA, as revealed in the witness statements, the Special Cell investigation, disclosure statements and some of the court judgements in the cases of violence. On the 24th and 25th of February 2020, Delhi saw large-scale anti-Hindu riots which marked the culmination of the hostility, hatred, and anger spread by the anti-CAA protests by the Islamists in Shaheen Bagh and other areas. Shahdara, Maujpur, Bhajanpura, Brahmapuri, and other parts of northeast Delhi witnessed violence perpetrated by the Islamists. 53 people died in these riots while more than 200 people were left injured.

Several Islamists like Sharjeel Imam, Umar Khalid, Meeran Haider, Tahir Hussain, Asif Iqbal Tanha etc were arrested and put behind bars for instigating the riots against the government over CAA. The charges and the evidence show that these Islamists conspired right from the 5th of December 2019 to create violence in Northeast Delhi, directed at Hindus, coinciding with the visit of then President Donald Trump to get maximum media coverage and to ensure that global attention would ‘bring the government to its knees’.

All the accused had given insidious hate speech against Hindus, instigated the violence, arranged the money for the violence and mobilised mobs of Muslims to target Hindus. The violence that USCIRF brands anti-Muslim was specifically targeted against Hindus with the first casualty being a police officer – Ratan Lal – who was mercilessly lynched by a Muslim mob. When the conspiracy started being hatched back on the 5th of December 2019, the driving motivation of the violence was many – not just the CAA. For example, Sharjeel Imam, Umar Khalid and many of the other Islamists had distributed pamphlets talking about the illegal structure called Babri and the Supreme Court judgement which confirmed that the land indeed belonged to Hindus where an ancient Hindu Temple was demolished and desecrated to built the Babri mosque.

The immediate facade adopted by the Islamists for the violence, was however, the Citizenship Amendment Act. While USCIRF brands it one that discriminated against Muslims, the truth is it had nothing to do with Indian Muslims as all. The act amendment aims to provide a dignified life to persecuted religious minorities who are unable to practice their faith in their home countries freely. Under the Citizenship Act of 1955, illegal migrants were ineligible for Indian citizenship. They could apply for citizenship under Section 5 of the Citizenship Act, but if unable to provide evidence of Indian origin, they were required to pursue citizenship through ‘naturalization’ under Section 6. This often resulted in the deprivation of numerous opportunities and benefits for them.

The Citizenship Amendment Act provided that these persons- Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis, and Christians from Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Pakistan should stay in India for at least 11 years to get citizenship by naturalization. These Islamic countries were formed by the partition based on religion. Therefore, this amendment does not make any provision for the Muslim community there because Muslims are neither a minority in these countries nor are they facing any persecution on religious grounds. One of the arguments furthered by many was that a section of Muslims, like the Ahmadiyas, often face persecution in Pakistan and therefore, should be given asylum in India. However, firstly, the act aimed to give persecuted religious minorities refuge in India – including Christians and not just Hindus. Since Muslims – any sect of Muslims – are not religious minorities in Islamic nations, they cannot avail benefit of the act. However, there are other methods by which persecuted Muslims too can apply for citizenship of India. That is not even considered by the USCIRF report while vilifying India and peddling Muslim victimhood. The act also does not affect the citizenship of any Indian minority, especially the Muslim community. This amendment does not violate anyone’s citizenship but gives legal rights to the deprived minorities of Islamic nations who are facing persecution today because of the partition of India based on religious lines.

Says, the government deliberately is targeting Muslim places of worship, demolishing them

In a separate section, the said report claimed that the government was deliberately targeting the minority community, getting their homes and places of worship demolished. It also added that the the Waqf Amendment Bill, introduced in the year 2024 seeks to broaden the government’s regulatory authority over these endowments and proposes the mandatory inclusion of non-Muslim members on Waqf Boards which might allegedly erode the community’s autonomy over its own religious institutions.

It stated that the BJP government also built the Ram Temple in Ayodhya on the place where there was an illegal mosque. It indicated that the Indian government had been deliberately targeting the Muslim community and running bulldozers over their places. But it is crucial to note here that all the places of worship in question belonging to the Muslim community, be it the Faizyab Mosque and Madrassa in Delhi’s Sarai Kale Khan area, the Akhoondji Mosque, the Babri Masjid, etc had been illegally built by practising illegal encroachment.

In the case of Ram Mandir also, the Supreme Court in November 2019 stated that the land on which the Babri Masjid was built earlier actually belonged to Ram Lalla. The Apex court then also ordered the union government to provide 5 acres of land at an alternate site at a prominent location in Ayodhya to the Sunni Waqf Board to rebuild the Babri Masjid which was demolished in 1992.

The Supreme Court said that there was adequate material in the ASI report to conclude the following the Babri Masjid was not constructed on vacant land. “There was a structure underlying the disputed structure. The underlying structure was not an Islamic structure,” the Supreme Court was quoted as saying during the verdict.

Further OpIndia has recorded several incidents of bulldozer action executed by the state. It is worth noting that all these actions have legally proceeded to demolish properties or places of worship constructed illegally, by practising illegal encroachments. The government has never targeted the minority community but the illegal encroachments, then be it by the majority community or the minority community.

For instance, in the recently reported Kukrail River project in Uttar Pradesh’s Lucknow, the state was demolishing all the illegal houses that were built in the Akbar Nagar area of Lucknow. Islamists then claimed that the Yogi Adityanath government was deliberately targeting the Muslims in the state post-elections. However, several Hindu families also had to face evacuation from the area given their properties were illegally constructed. The India TV reporter on the ground highlighted the list of residents who were asked by the Lucknow Development Authority (LDA) to vacate their illegal properties before the ultimate bulldozer action. The list of names includes several Hindus identified as Asha Devi, Devi Prasad, Amit Kumar, Sham Kashyap, Ramesh Chandra, etc who have lost their properties to the demolition drive. Detailed reports in this case can be read here.

The report claims ‘Love Jihad’ is a conspiracy theory, but here’s the truth

The report further blatantly claims that 12 of 28 Indian states at present have implemented anti-conversion laws to target minority communities. “These laws prohibit conversion under circumstances that far exceed cases of coercion, and they are often punishable by hefty fines and prison terms. Authorities frequently enforce such laws under the pretext of preventing so-called “love jihad”—a conspiracy theory that claims Muslim men target and seduce Hindu women for conversion to Islam—while in effect targeting interfaith relationships,” the report quoted.

It is important to note that Islamists have been habitual in peddling the misleading narrative which believes that the incidents of Love Jihad are fake. Many even today consider love jihad a hoax, but several cases continue to be reported almost daily in which Islamist men deliberately trap Hindu women in a love affair and then force them to convert to their religion.

The Islamist men target the Hindu women using fake Hindu identities. Then they sexually assault, and torture them before forcing them to convert their religion to Islam. When the Indian government imposed a ban on the terrorist outfit Popular Front of India (PFI), several incriminating documents were recovered from the PFI hideouts. In one of the documents, it was mentioned that Muslim men would be offered hefty money, a fancy home, and all the required support for trapping Hindu women in a ‘love affair’ and then converting them to Islam.

OpIndia has in the past few years reported several such cases from various parts of the country including Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Himachal Pradesh, Karnataka, etc. The lives of Hindu women are ruined due to these deliberate trappings, so much so that sometimes they even have to face brutal deaths. Detailed reports regarding Love Jihad can be read here.

USCIRF selectively believes Muslims and Christians are detained for religious beliefs

In its India section, the Commission stated that Muslims and Christians are the two largest groups detained for their religious beliefs. “Indian authorities have arrested both Muslims and Christians under false claims of facilitating forced conversions. Religious clerics have been accused of arranging marriages. Muslim student activists have also been detained for their religious freedom advocacy, often under anti-terrorism laws,” it said.

The list of arrested individuals mentioned by the commission included names of Meeran Haider, Umar Khalid, Rona Wilson, Irfan Mehraj, Rupesh Singh, and Gokarkonda Naga Saibaba. It said that “Dalit Rights Activists like Saibaba and Wilson have been detained for advocating on behalf of Dalits (members of India’s lowest caste), as illustrated by the 2020 arrest of 16 advocates in Bhima Koregaon. While many Dalits are Hindu, they face discrimination and violence and lack recognition in Hindu society. Dalit Christians also face severe religious intolerance.”

It also added that journalists and human rights activists have been targeted for their religious freedom advocacy efforts. Now, all the members referred to as targeted by the USCIRF have been accused under serious charges.

Meeran Haider is accused in the larger conspiracy related to the anti-Hindu Delhi Riots of 2020. Haider was a Jamia student and leader of the RJD youth wing. He was arrested in April 2020 in connection with the Delhi riots case on allegations of coordinating efforts to incite violence during the riots.

In September 2020, Umar Khalid former JNU student and son of an ex-SIMI member was arrested for his role in the Delhi anti-Hindu riots that broke out on the 24th of February and claimed over 50 lives. He was booked under the stringent UAPA and accused of deliberately instigating people to commit communal riots. He was in touch with several Islamists and Congress leaders like Sushant Singh, the Savdhan India actor, Jignesh Mewani, Yogendra Yadav, Swara Bhaskar, etc to create and spread the anti-Hindu narrative.

Rona Wilson was among the top 5 supposed urban Maoist operatives who were arrested by Pune Police in 2018 over charges of inciting the Bhima Koregaon violence in January of that year. Wilson is a supposed “close aide” of Delhi University professor GN Saibaba who was convicted in March 2017 for waging a war against India via his Maoist links and anti-national activities. Saibaba was awarded life imprisonment by the Gadchiroli sessions court. 

On March 20 last year, the National Investigation Agency (NIA) arrested ‘journalist’ Irfan Mehraj, Editor of ‘Two Circles’ in connection with a ‘terror funding case’, which was registered in October 2020. ‘Independent journalist’ Rupesh Singh along with his two associates Mithilesh Kumar and Mohammad Kalam were arrested by Bihar Police in Bhagalpur’s Dobhi region in the year 2019. Also, a huge quantity of explosives and Naxal literature was recovered from their car when they were on their way to Chhakarbandha. As per the police, they were on their way to deliver the explosives to the Naxals. 15 bundles of detonators and 32 gelatin rods were recovered.

Conclusion

It seems that the report by USCRF has selectively reported incidents accusing the Indian government of targeting the minority community in the country. It came to the conclusion that the India government had deliberately employed resources to allegedly harass the minority community.

“The Indian government continues to repress and restrict religious communities through the enforcement of discriminatory legislation like anti-conversion laws, cow slaughter laws, and antiterrorism laws. In doing so, authorities have arbitrarily detained individuals highlighting violations of religious freedom, including religious leaders, journalists, and human rights activists, without due process—in some cases for years. Indian officials have repeatedly employed hateful and derogatory rhetoric and misinformation to perpetuate false narratives about religious minorities, inciting widespread violence, lynchings, and demolition of places of worship,” the report noted.

However, it failed to report several incidents of targeted attacks on Hindus at the hands of Islamists. OpIndia has reported several such incidents in which the Hindu community has been deliberately targeted for following a particular religion in India, incidents of jihad (Love Jihad, land Jihad) being classic examples. Hindus have been murdered by Islamists for supporting Nupur Sharma, they have been targeted for following and celebrating Hindu festivals, and they have been targeted for raising voices against extreme Islamist activities intended to destroy peace within the nation.

The USCIRF seemingly has sided with the Islamists who keep on dismissing such targeted attacks on Hindus as part of a huge hoax narrative. It has selectively downplayed events against Hindus, arguing instead that the latter allegedly backed by the state poses a threat to India’s minority communities. Aside from ignoring Love Jihad and attacks on Hindus, the report has also attempted to glorify the activists and journalists who have been arrested under serious charges and have usually sided with Islamists, come what may.

The Islamists as mentioned in the incriminating PFI document want the rule of Islam in the country by the year 2047 when India would complete its 100 years of independence. Moreover, such Islamists who look up to the rule of Islam by 2047 are provided funds from several Islamic countries to propagate the narrative against the majority community in India. USCIRF says the Indian government is allegedly harassing, and threatening the Islamists but it fails to report that these Islamists actually are engaged in posing a threat to the country’s independence.

Gaza’s de-facto PM Rawhi Mushtaha killed in airstrike 3 months ago, announces Israel, says Hamas kept it secret to prevent loss of morale

0

On Thursday, 3rd October, the Israeli military declared that it had eliminated another Hamas leader identified as Rawhi Mushtaha, the head of the Hamas administration in Gaza. The country also stated that two more security officers along with Mushtaha were eliminated during airstrikes three months ago.

According to an Israeli military statement, the strike targeted an underground facility in northern Gaza, killing Mushtaha and leaders Sameh al-Siraj and Sami Oudeh. Rawhi Mushtaha was the de facto prime minister of the Gaza Strip, Siraj held the security portfolio of the Hamas political bureau and Hamas Labor Committee whereas Oudeh was Commander of Hamas General Security Mechanism.

“During a precise IDF and ISA intelligence-based strike, IAF fighter jets struck and eliminated the terrorists while they were hiding in a fortified and equipped underground compound in the northern Gaza Strip. The compound served as a Hamas command and control centre and enabled senior operatives to remain inside of it for extended periods,” the official statement by Israel read.

“Following the strike on the compound and the elimination of the terrorists, Hamas did not announce their deaths as it had done following previous eliminations, in order to prevent loss of morale and functioning of its terror operatives,” added the statement.

As per the statement, Rawhi Mushtaha was a prominent Hamas agent with direct influence over Hamas troop deployment choices. Mushtaha participated in military decisions while simultaneously serving as the Head of Hamas Civil Governance in the Gaza Strip and the Prisoners Affairs Portfolio. He formerly held the finance portfolio.

Mushtaha and Yahya Sinwar founded Hamas’ General Security Mechanism, the official statement was quoted. They served a prison sentence together in an Israeli jail. Mushtaha was regarded as the most senior official in Hamas’ political bureau in the Gaza Strip, and he maintained civil control of the Hamas administration while engaging in terrorist operations against Israel during the conflict. Mushtaha was believed to be Sinwar’s right-hand person and one of his closest confidants.

The Israel govt added that “The IDF and ISA will continue to pursue all of the terrorists responsible for the October 7th massacre and will operate against anyone who threatens the State of Israel.”

This comes days after Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah was killed in his bunker in an Israeli air strike. Apparently, the strike that happened on 29th September was approved by Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu while he was attending a United Nations meeting in New York. Also on July 13th, Israel Defence Forces (IDF) announced that Hamas military wing commander Mohammed Deif had been killed in an airstrike in the southern Gaza Strip.

On July 31st, Hamas confirmed that their chief Ismail Haniyeh was assassinated in Tehran, Iran. He was killed in an Israeli air strike on his house. His three sons, Hazem, Amir, and Mohammad, along with a number of his grandchildren, were also killed in an Israeli attack in April this year. Several other Islamist leaders belonging to Hamas are being targeted by Israel after the former launched a dreadful attack on Israel in October 2023, parading women naked and murdering innocent.

Hamas, short for “Harakat al-Muqawama al-Islamiyya” (Islamic Resistance Movement), was established in 1987. It was an offshoot of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood in Gaza. In the beginning, the Muslim Brotherhood was relatively moderate. However, with the evolution of Hamas, it turned into a radical Islamist organization. The full name of the Palestinian terrorist organization translates to the “Islamic Resistance Movement”.

In its founding documents, specifically in the Hamas Charter published on 18th August 1988, the group emphasized jihad and the establishment of an Islamic state from the Mediterranean Sea to the Jordan River. From the charter, came the infamous murderous slogan “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free”. The ultimate goal of the terrorist organization is the destruction of Israel.

Varanasi: Here’s why some Hindu groups are removing Sai Baba idols from temples and immersing them in Ganga river

On Tuesday (1st October), Sai Baba statues were removed from several temples in Varanasi as part of a campaign launched by the ‘Sanatan Rakshak Dal’. The Hindu rights group removed a 5-foot-tall Sai idol from the Bada Ganesh Temple in Lohatia. Members of Sanatan Rakshak Dal took the idol of Sai from here wrapped it in white cloth and immersed it in the Ganga river. Similar demands to remove Sai Baba idols from Hindu temples have been raised in Lucknow and several other cities.

Speaking about why Sai Baba statues were being removed, Rammu Guru, the head priest of the Bada Ganesh temple in Varanasi said: “Sai Baba was being worshipped without proper knowledge, which is forbidden according to scriptures.”

Meanwhile, Ajay Sharma, state president of the Sanatan Rakshak Dal said: “Only the worship of Lord Shiva, the supreme deity, should take place in Kashi. Respecting the sentiments of devotees, statues of Sai Baba have already been removed from 14 temples. In the coming days, statues will also be removed from the Agastyakunda and Bhuteshwar temples.”

Notably, on Wednesday (2nd October), Sanatan Rakshak Dal leader Ajay Sharma was detained by the local police after he along with other activists removed Sai Baba statues from some Hindu temples. While Sharma said that Sai Baba’s idol will be removed from 50 more temples, several locals have raised objections.

Notably, Sai Baba, a renowned spiritual figure, is noted for his teachings on love, forgiveness, and compassion. Sai Baba is believed to be revered by several people belonging to the Hindu and other religious communities. However, it is contended by a significant section of Hindus and Hindu rights groups that Sai Baba was a Muslim and thus, he should not be worshipped by Hindus. While some of the Sai devotees also believe Sai Baba to be an incarnation of Lord Dattatreya, however, there is no reference of the same in Vedic or Puranic texts.

According to the website of the Shree Saibaba Sansthan Trust in Shirdi, Sai Baba is revered as one of the greatest saints ever seen in India, endowed with extraordinary powers, and worshipped as a God incarnate. (SAI stands for Sakshaat Ishwar) (God, the absolute).

Emphasising Sai Baba’s life and teachings transcending the religious barriers, the  Shree Saibaba Sansthan Trust says “An outstanding aspect of Sai Baba is that he is beyond distinctions of religion, caste or creed. He embodied all religions and preached the Universal religion of Love. Devotees of all faiths find their meeting point in the Sai and people from all communities and all walks of life are united by the great love and reverence Baba inspires in them.”

The Shree Saibaba Sansthan Trust also mentioned how Sai Baba addressed God as “Allah”. It states that Sai Baba spent much time at a mosque and went on to describe himself as the servant of Allah whose soul constantly remembers Allah. “Baba had great regard for his Hindu devotees and their Gurus and he responded to their needs and permitted worship according to the Hindu and other religious rituals. At the same time, his dwelling place was a Masjid (Mosque) and the name of Allah was ever on his lips. He described himself as in Service to GOD (ALLAH) and as a soul ever remembering ALLAH -(YAD – A – HAKKA),” the Saibaba Sansthan Trust states.

Source: Shree Saibaba Sansthan Trust website

“People today flock to Shirdi in ever-increasing numbers to pay homage to the Divine and to experience the truth of Baba’s promise that He would be active in answering devotees’ prayers even from his tomb. Like Ten Commandments BABA has given eleven assurances to humanity for welfare. Baba said that he was a slave in the service of those who loved him that he was ever living to help those who turn to him and that he has to take care of his children day and night. He then taught the values of total surrender to the Almighty Master (ALLAH MALIK EK- The only ONE) and experience his grace,” it adds.

BJP and Congress condemn removal of Sai Baba idols in Varanasi

On Wednesday, Congress and BJP leaders in Maharashtra condemned the removal of Sai Baba statues from various temples in Varanasi, saying disrespect to the 19th-century spiritual leader and said that the removal of Sai Baba statues is intolerable. “Sai Baba was a revered figure and nobody should be allowed to insult him. “This campaign to remove his statues should stop,” BJP leader Chandrashekhar Bawankule said. Similarly, Congress leader Balasaheb Thorat called the incident “unfortunate”.

When Shankaracharya Swaroopanand Saraswati called Saibaba as “Chand Miya”

Back in 2014, the late Shankaracharya Swaroopanand Saraswati launched a campaign to urge Hindus not to worship Sai Baba since he was not a Hindu. He even called Sai Baba as Chand Miya emphasising his Muslim identity. Swaroopanand Saraswati had even released posters featuring Lord Hanuman ‘driving out’ Sai with a tree trunk.

Poster issued by Shankaracharya Swaroopanand Saraswati in 2014 featuring angry Lord Hanuman ‘driving out’ Sai Baba with a tree trunk

Slamming the Sai Baba Trust, Swaroopanand Saraswati had alleged that the Trust was behind ‘ruining’ Hindu Dharma by projecting Sai Baba as superior to Lord Hanuman and other Hindu gods. Sai Baba’s real name was Chand Miya who is dead and we treat him as a ghost and not God,” Swaroopanand said back then.

In April last year, Pandit Dhirendra Krishna Shastri, the Mahant of Bageshwar Dham opined that Sai Baba was not a Hindu god. He said that Sai Baba can be called a saint or fakir, but he cannot be called a God. He has also said that no vulture can pretend to be a lion.

“Shankaracharya ji of our Dharma has not given Sai Baba the place of a deity. Shankaracharya is the Prime Minister of the Hindu Dharma. Therefore, obeying him is the duty of every Sanatani. Any saint of our Dharma, be it Goswami Tulsidas ji or Surdas ji, is a saint, a great man, a Yug Purush, a Kalpa Purush but not a God,” Shastri said. Later, an FIR was filed against Shastri for his comments on Sai Baba.

OpIndia has documented incidents in the recent years wherein Muslim mobs vandalised Sai Baba idols, pelted stones in Gujarat and other cases, attempts were made to convert his temple into a Mazar in Uttar Pradesh.

Madras HC quashes charges against stunt choreographer in Periyar speech case, says the anti-Hindu statements inscribed on stature caused him to react

0

On 3rd October, the Madras High Court quashed a charge sheet that the Chennai Central Crime Branch police had filed against film 61-year-old action choreographer Kanal Kannan, also known as V. Kannan. The case pertained to his 2022 speech where he demanded the removal of a statue of the anti-Hindu EV Ramasamy, popularly known as “Periyar” among his followers. The statue is located outside the prominent Sri Ranganathaswamy Temple at Srirangam in Tamil Nadu’s Tiruchi district and was erected there in 2006.

Justice G. Jayachandran highlighted, “It is the member of Thanthai Periyar Dravidar Kazhagam who has given the complaint. In fact, the display of provocative words, commenting about believers of God opposite to a Hindu temple, is the cause for the speech and the person who had provoked the speech cannot take advantage of their provocations and prosecute the petitioner for his reaction.”

The judge approved the plea submitted by Kannan and set aside the whole prosecution proceeding before a Metropolitan Magistrate court at Egmore in Chennai. The case was booked in 2022 and the petitioner was arrested immediately. Subsequently, he was granted bail by Justice GK Ilanthiraiyan, subject to the stunt master submitting an affidavit promising not to make such offensive comments in the future.

Kannan, however, contended that there was nothing wrong with calling for the statue which is situated directly outside a temple that is frequented by thousands of worshippers each day to be taken down, along with some “disparaging comments” about theists. He added that rather than apprehending the people who had installed the statue in front of the sacred place, the police had arrested him. Kannan stated that the speech was delivered during a public gathering hosted by the Hindu Munnani, of which he was an office bearer. Speaking to the attendees, he had declared that the statue outside the temple should be destroyed since it displayed remarks that all those who worship God and believe in him are “fools and barbarians.”

He submitted that he did not think his remarks violated any laws. However, the presence of the statue containing such statements is undoubtedly illegal and is punishable by the Indian Penal Code’s Sections 153 (promoting hostility between various groups), 505(1)(b) (disturbing public tranquillity), and 505(2) (promoting enmity between classes). The petitioner further stated that several videos denigrating Hindu gods and the Hindu faith had been making the rounds on social media in recent days, but the police had declined to file complaints against the perpetrators.

In his speech, Kannan pointed out, “Sri Ranganathaswamy temple is a holy one where at least one lakh Hindus worship every day. But opposite the temple, there is a statue of someone who said that there is no god. The day when that statue is broken will be the day we Hindus will rise.” Kannan has choreographed stunts for multiple Telugu, Kannada, Tamil, and Malayali films. Furthermore, he has given cameos in numerous movies.

“Iran will pay a price,” says Israel’s envoy to India, Reuven Azar, after Iran’s missile attack on Israel

 Israel’s Ambassador to India, Reuven Azar, said that the country successfully defended itself against a barrage of ballistic missiles launched by Iran on Tuesday, adding that Iran would face consequences of this attack.

“Our PM was very clear that Iran will pay a price. We have to think about it thoroughly–can we have a situation where rouge states like Iran attack with a barrage of ballistic missiles? If this goes unchecked, then consequences will be terrible for the region…If nobody is going to stop Iran, then it is our responsibility,” said the envoy.

While speaking to ANI, Ambassador Azar attributed Israel’s success in defending the rocket barrage to two key factors, Israel’s advanced air defence systems and its strong partnerships with the United States and neighbouring countries.

“We were pretty successful because of two reasons. First of all, we have probably the best air defence systems in the world and we have been able to thwart most of these missiles. We only left unattacked those who fell in open areas,” he said.

“And the second reason is that we have a very good partnership with the United States, for which we are very thankful, and with our neighbours that have been also helping us to thwart these ballistic missiles that are flying over their territory,” he added.

Further, Azar emphasised that the countries of the Middle East remain ‘determined’ to protect themselves and confront Iran’s blatant violation of international law.

“So we are determined, the countries of the Middle East, to do what we can defend ourselves from and to confront this flagrant violation of international law,” he said to ANI.

The comments come after Iran launched approximately 200 ballistic missiles at targets in Israel on October 1 in response to Israel’s killing of Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah in Beirut last week and following the July 31 assassination of Hamas political chief Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran, Al Jazeera reported.

The salvo of 180 projectiles caused no casualties as most missiles were intercepted, according to Israeli army reports. Iran claimed it was targeting three military bases in the Tel Aviv area.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu immediately pledged to retaliate and said Iran “made a big mistake and will pay”, as the US rallied behind its close ally, as per Al Jazeera.

“Make no mistake, the United States is fully, fully, fully supportive of Israel,” President Joe Biden said at the White House, adding that he was discussing a response to the attack.

The international community continues to monitor the situation closely, with many nations condemning Iran’s actions.

(This news report is published from a syndicated feed. Except for the headline, the content has not been written or edited by OpIndia staff)

Vivek Agnihotri, the man who came up with ‘The Kashmir Files’, set to release first chapter of his ‘The Delhi Files’ on August 15, 2025

Filmmaker Vivek Agnihotri, the man who came up with the landmark film ‘The Kashmir Files’ will soon be back with another iconic film, ‘The Delhi Files’. However, this time, Agnihotri has decided to release this film in two parts. The first part of the film will release on August 15, 2025.

Sharing the news, Vivek Agnihotri said, “After years of research, the story of #TheDelhiFiles is too powerful for one part. We’re excited to bring you The Bengal Chapter – the first of two parts, unveiling a significant chapter in our history.”

Vivek Agnihotri has been known for directing landmark films like ‘The Tashkent Files’, ‘The Kashmir Files’ ,and ‘The Vaccine War’ in the past. Now he is set to hit the silver screen with ‘The Delhi Files’.

The poster of the film released on October 3 by Vivek Agnihotri featured a silhouette of a child raising its hand towards the national emblem shown in the background.

Vinesh Phogat and her endless tantrums: The retired wrestler and current Congress leader has been falsely blaming BJP for her Olympics disqualification

Ever since retired wrestler Vinesh Phogat joined the Congress party ahead of the upcoming elections in Haryana, where she is a candidate, she has been on a lying spree. Phogat has been inadvertently exposing her own lies.

Recently, Vinesh Phogat, who has since joined Congress and is a candidate from Julana assembly, claimed that Prime Minister Narendra Modi had called her after her disqualification from Paris Olympics, however, she refused to speak to him.

“The call had come (from PM) but I refused to speak. The call did not come directly to me but Indian officials who were there informed me that he (PM Modi) wanted to talk. I was ready. However, they put conditions – no one from my team would be present, while two people from their side would record the conversation for social media. I didn’t want my emotions and hard work to be made fun of on social media. “If he truly cared about athletes, he could have called without recording it, and I would have been grateful. Maybe he knows if I speak to Vinesh she will ask about the last two years. Maybe that’s why I was instructed that there will be no phone from my side because they can edit (video) from their end but I will not edit. I will post the original video. So they denied,” Phogat said.

Interestingly, Phogat’s statement came just days after she claimed that none of the BJP leaders had called her after her disqualification from the Paris Olympics earlier this year. “Not a single BJP leader called me. Nor did they message me. Didn’t they had my phone number, or did they not know me, they could have broken the narrative…” Phogat said.

On the one hand, Vinesh Phogat claims none of the BJP leaders called her, on the other hand, she claims PM Modi called her but she refused to talk. The last time we checked, Narendra Modi is still a BJP leader.

In an interview, Vinesh Phogat claimed that the government did not support her much and then suggested that the Modi government spent Rs 75 lakh on her training and other relevant expenses in the last 2-3 years. While insinuating that the government did not fully support her, the Congress leader ended up saying that whatever the government did was their duty and not a favour.

“I’d like to ask what facilities did they actually provide me? Who gave me a coach? The government didn’t even provide me with a coach. All of it came from private sponsors like Olympic Gold Quest. They provided the coach, the physio, and handled all the finances. The government is lying,” Phogat claimed.

She also launched a tirade against Indian Olympic Association chief PT Usha and alleged that she and other staff members came to visit only to click pictures and did not provide her any support. Phogat claimed to have been in a ‘semi-conscious’ state when her pictures with PT Usha were clicked at the hospital. However, it could be clearly seen in the image that the Vinesh Phogat was very much in a conscious state.  

PT Usha visited a hospitalised Vinesh Phogat in Paris (Source: PTI)

“I don’t know what support I got there. PT Usha madam visited me at the hospital. One photo was clicked… Like you said, in politics a lot happens behind closed doors. Similarly, politics happened there (in Paris) as well. That’s why I was heartbroken. Otherwise a lot of people are saying ‘don’t leave wrestling’. For what should I continue! There is politics everywhere,” Phogat claimed.

While Vinesh Phogat claimed she did not receive any real support from PT Usha and the government, it was documented how the IOA chief and the rest of the staff constantly assisted Phogat in going all out to reduce Phogat’s weight to take up the matter with Olympics authorities. The Modi government also immediately appointed top lawyer Harish Salve to take up her case.

In addition, Phogat was provided 40 days of training in Budapest, private coaching, and a dietician of her choice among other facilities. While it is true that the government does not do a favour to athletes by providing them with all the required assistance, however, it is highly disgraceful to discredit a government doing its duty, simply because Vinesh Phogat lost the medal due to her own failure to control weight or that she intended to join the Congress party.

Contrary to the claims made by Vinesh Phogat, Union Minister of Youth Affairs and Sports, Mansukh Mandaviya had informed the Lok Sabha that Vinesh Phogat was provided with all requisite assistance and training for the Paris Olympics.

“The Indian government has provided all necessary assistance to Vinesh Phogat. Personal staff, including notable Hungarian coach Woller Akos and physio Ashwini Jiwan Patil, were assigned to her,” Mandaviya said.

Moreover, he highlighted the financial aid provided to Phogat, and said: “Financial assistance for other personal staff, including sparring partners and strength and conditioning experts, was provided. She received a total of Rs 70,45,775 in financial assistance for the Paris Olympics.”

Notably, Minister Mandaviya’s revelation on assistance provided to Vinesh Phogat was shared as the opposition parties turned Phogat’s Olympic disqualification into a political issue. OpIndia reported earlier, how not only Congress leaders, but its supportive ecosystem on social media blamed PM Modi for Phogat’s disqualification. Even as Vinesh Phogat was disqualified on technical grounds, and the government had no role to play in this, the Congress-friendly ecosystem asserted that somehow PM Modi conspired to ensure Vinesh Phogat’s disqualification due to his ego since Phogat had participated in protests against a BJP leader and former president of the Wrestling Federation of India, Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh.   

From “I don’t know politics” to “I was always politically aware”, Vinesh Phogat, the Congress leader

Among the many flip-flops Vinesh Phogat has made recently, the most hilarious remains the one wherein she first claimed to have zero knowledge of politics, and just days later joined Congress party to contest from Julana, in Haryana elections, only to reveal that she was always politically aware.

Even after Vinesh’s empty-handed return from yet another Olympics due to Vinesh Phogat’s own failure to achieve the required 50kg weight, the BJP government in Haryana decided to felicitate Phogat like a silver medalist and offered her Rs 4 crore.

Although it is not new or shocking that political leaders heap praises on their party’ command’s orders, Vinesh Phogat went a step ahead and said that it was Priyanka Gandhi Vadra who encouraged her to wrestle again. It is amusing that Phogat has suddenly accredited all her achievements to the Congress party and Priyanka Gandhi while portraying the BJP as the cause of all her miseries.

However, it was the Modi government that gave her the Arjuna Award in 2016 and Dhyan Chand Khel Ratna in 2020. From training, staff, and financial support to awards and recognition, Vinesh Phogat received it all when BJP was at the helm of power in Centre, and in her home state Haryana, and yet she has the audacity to blatantly lie and disparage the Modi government for petty political gains.  

Notably, Vinesh Phogat had requested, and was allowed to keep her private support team, including coach, physio, dietitian, and she was not under the supervision of the Wrestling Federation of India (WFI).  

Vinesh Phogat’s Olympics disqualification and the politics around it

Vinesh Phogat originally contested in the 53 kg category. However, during the time, she was off the mat for more than one-and-a-half years due to injuries and the protests against the Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) chief Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh, Antim Panghal secured an  Olympic quota for India in the 53kg category. Phogat then decided to switch to the lighter weight – 50 kg category – to ensure her place in the Olympics.

Despite it being against the rules, she was allowed to contest in qualifiers in both the 50 kg and 53 kg categories. She lost the qualifying match in the 53 kg category but won in 50kg. Therefore, she had to keep her weight in limit for the 50kg because she qualified for the 50 kg category in the Paris Olympics. However, she was struggling to maintain her weight below the allowed limit for several months.

Vinesh Phogat’s weight was around 2.7 kg higher than the limit a day before the finals, and despite various efforts, including cutting hair, shortening clothes, and sitting in the sauna, the weight could not be brought within Olympics requirements. Therefore, Vinesh Phogat was disqualified on technical grounds, and the govt had no role to play in this. However, Vinesh Phogat and the Congress party have made her Olympic disqualification as the core issue in Haryana elections.

Supreme Court stays Madras High Court’s order against Isha Foundation, slams police action

0

The Supreme Court, on 3rd October, Thursday, stayed the High Court order against Sadhguru’s Isha Foundation. “We are staying the direction of the High Court at the same time we will exercise parens patrie jurisdiction,” pronounced the bench led by CJI DY Chandrachud.

The Bench headed by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, also comprising Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, sought to inquire about the details from two women whose father had moved the high court alleging illegal confinement at the Isha Foundation. 

“We will ask the secretary of the DLSA to visit the ashram, talk to the women, as well as other monks, and submit a report. Since this is a habeas corpus petition, we would like to hear both monks in the chamber and come back in 5 minutes,” the court stated and added, “We would like to interact with you (monk) in chambers online.”

The court also slammed the police action and declared, “The first thing is that you cannot let the army or police in the establishment like this. What we will do is ask a judicial officer to visit the premises and talk to these two inmates.” Notably, Sadhguru had approached the apex court after a team of 150 police personnel, including three Deputy Superintendents of Police (DSPs), led by an Additional Superintendent of Police (ASP) from Coimbatore, stormed the Isha Foundation’s ashram in Thondamuthur.

The development transpired after the Madras High Court requested a report on all criminal cases against the foundation. The court issued orders to present a list of cases during the hearing of a habeas corpus petition filed by Dr S Kamraj, who alleged that his daughters, Latha and Geetha, were being held captive at the ashram. Furthermore, he alleged that they were being brainwashed into becoming monks at the Isha Foundation centre.

Hathras stampede: UP police files 3,200-page chargesheet, self-styled godman Bhole Baba not named in charge sheet against 11 accused

On 2nd October, a 3,200-page charge sheet was filed by the authorities in connection with the 2nd July stampede that occurred at the Narayan Sakar Hari “Bhole Baba” congregation in Phulrai hamlet of Uttar Pradesh’s Hathras. The majority of the 121 fatalities were women and children. The police have charged 11 individuals, including two women sevadars (volunteers). However, Surajpal Singh, the self-styled ‘godman’ popularly known as Bhole Baba was not listed as an accused.

The primary organiser of the event, Dev Prakash Madhukar, Megh Singh, Mukesh Kumar, Manju Devi, Manju Yadav, Ram Ladhete, Upendra Singh, Sanju Kumar, Ram Prakash Shakya, Durvesh Kumar, and Dalveer Singh are the people against whom the charge sheet has been filed. These names were also mentioned in the First Information Report (FIR).

According to the charge sheet, “Mukhya Sewadar” Madhukar is the primary accused. The night following the event, he was named the prime culprit in the complaint filed at the Sikandra Rau police station in the Hathras district. Furthermore, he was charged with deceiving the authorities by obtaining authorization for an 80,000-person gathering of devotees when in fact over 2.5 lakh people attended the religious assembly in Phulrai village.

Ashok Kumar Singh, additional superintendent of police, announced that the court had received the charge sheet against the eleven defendants. The state government established a judicial panel and a Special Investigation Team (SIT) on 3rd July to look into the incident. Eleven people, including those in charge of obtaining the event’s permits, were charged by the SIT. Manju Devi and Manju Yadav, two of the accused, received bail after Allahabad High Court’s orders.

On 4th October, the next date of the case’s hearing, the accused will receive copies of the charge sheet that was submitted to the Hathras Chief Judicial Magistrate’s court. “Out of the 11 named and arrested in the case, two of the women accused, Manju Devi and Manju Yadav, have obtained interim bail from the Allahabad high court but only one is out of jail as, in the case of Manju Yadav, bail bonds are to be submitted,” stated AP Singh, a Delhi-based lawyer who is representing the accused.

He added, “The SIT probing the case has filed the charge sheet. A separate judicial inquiry into the matter is ongoing.” Ten accused were brought before the court on 2nd October.

The Hathras police have refuted claims that they were “soft” on Bhole Baba and stated that their probe is underway. ASP Ashok Kumar Singh was questioned about whether Hathras police had given Bhole Baba the clean sheet and he replied, “Investigation is an ongoing process and is on in this case too. It is too early to jump to any conclusion based on the charge sheet filed now.”

The FIR in the case was registered under sections 105 (culpable homicide not amounting to murder), 110 (attempt to commit culpable homicide), 126 (2) (wrongful restraint), 223 (disobedience to order duly promulgated by the public servant) and 238 (causing disappearance of evidence) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). The stampede happened at a satsang (religious gathering) presided over by Bhole Baba, a resident of Patiyali tehsil in the Kasganj district of Uttar Pradesh’s Bahadur Nagar hamlet.

Bhole Baba showed up in Bahadur Nagar village on 17th  July, fifteen days after the stampede and declared, “Honi ko kaun taal sakta hai, jo aaya hai, use ek din jana hai (No one can prevent the turn of fate, one who has taken birth, has to die one day).” He placed the blame on a “conspiracy” and “a poisonous spray” in an attempt to escape accountability. His attorney AP Singh also alleged the instance happened when “some poisonous substance” was sprayed by 15-16 “unidentified men” who left the scene when people started to drop dead.

On 9th July, a week after the stampede, the SIT handed its report to Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath in Lucknow. Six officials were suspended in the first action, including the SDM, the tehsildar, the circle officer, and the in-charge of the Sikandra Rau police station. The possibility of a “big conspiracy” causing the stampede was not ruled out by the SIT which also referred to the political ties of Bhole Baba. The Hathras stampede case is also being investigated by a different judicial commission led by retired Allahabad High Court judge Brijesh Kumar Srivastava.

As per reports, the stampede happened when ‘devotees’ rushed to collect the ‘charan dhool’ of Bhole Baba. Many slipped in the mud and eventually a large number of people started falling on one another.

How the govt is cracking down on dubious foreign funded NGOs like Oxfam and CPR running ‘sinister campaigns’ under the guise of charitable activities

The Income Tax Department in India has conducted a significant crackdown on several NGOs, including Oxfam India, Centre for Policy Research (CPR)- the Delhi-based think tank run by the daughter of Mani Shankar Aiyar, Environics Trust (ET), the Legal Initiative for Forest and Environment (LIFE), and Care India Solution for Sustainable Development (CISSD). The FCRA licences of these NGOs were subsequently suspended by the Central government.

The Income Tax Department’s probe into these NGOs came after searches conducted on September 7, 2022. These searches were part of a larger investigation into the financial practices, foreign funding, and compliance with the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA) by these organizations.

The IT Department’s raids focused on uncovering discrepancies in the financial dealings of these NGOs, particularly concerning the utilization of foreign donations. The government has been scrutinizing such organizations amid concerns over their financial transparency and potential misuse of funds. The searches reportedly yielded documents and evidence suggesting violations of tax laws and FCRA regulations.

Following the searches conducted by the Income Tax Department, it was concluded that NGOs, including Oxfam, CPR, Environics Trust, LIFE, and CISSD, had allegedly violated provisions of the 2010 Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA). The violations were primarily related to discrepancies or a “mismatch” between the NGOs’ annual returns and the statements of their foreign currency bank accounts. Additionally, the NGOs were accused of the “misutilisation” of foreign currency funds, implying that the funds were not used for their intended purposes as stipulated under the FCRA.

According to a report by The Indian Express, in 2023, a year after the raids were conducted, the Income Tax Department issued notices to Oxfam, CPR, Environics Trust, LIFE, and CISSD, under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act. This section allows authorities to reassess the income of entities suspected of evading taxes.

In its letters to these NGOs, which ran in 100s of pages, the department included copies of various agreements, financial statements, emails, minutes and draft notes of board meetings, to substantiate the key allegations levelled against these NGOs.

The letter read that these NGOs receive significant funding from foreign entities. It said that evidence had surfaced showing a coordinated effort by foreign entities to financially support Indian NGOs and trusts. The IT Dept also blew the lid off how the involvement of these NGOs in orchestrating paid protests to stall key public infrastructure and development projects in India’s national interest.

The activities of these trusts “appear to be a systematic effort by foreign entities to stall development projects in India”, the Income Tax department said.

According to the data made public by the Income Tax Department, from 2015 to 2021, NGOs such as Care India, Environics Trust, LIFE, and Oxfam received a significant portion of their funding from foreign sources. Care India allegedly obtained 92% of its funding from abroad, Environics Trust received 95%, LIFE 86%, and Oxfam 78%. Notably, Environics Trust reportedly received 100% of its funding from foreign entities for three out of these six years.

The Income Tax Department also highlighted that these five NGOs are “interconnected” and that their key figures are “interlinked.” The letters sent to four of the five NGOs — Oxfam, Environics Trust, LIFE, and Care India — contained a common section titled “Concerted efforts by connected NGOs,” implying coordinated actions among these organizations. The department’s investigation suggested that these NGOs might have collaborated, raising further concerns about their operations and foreign funding sources.

‘Should work for the benefit of the public as a whole and not the benefit of any particular religious community or caste (the Muslim community)’: IT letter to Oxfam India accuses the NGO of running a ‘sinister campaign’ under the guise of charitable activities

In its 141-page letter to Oxfam India, the Income Tax (I-T) department said that the NGO engaged in activities that deviated from its stated charitable objectives. The letter highlighted Oxfam India’s alleged involvement in supporting Oxfam Australia’s efforts to halt mining operations by the Adani Group.

Citing emails and data from hard drives, the I-T department stated that Oxfam India had a direct interest in “delisting Adani Ports” and described it as part of a “sinister plan” under the guise of charitable activities to target an Indian business group in Australia.

The letter also pointed to Oxfam’s financial involvement in movements like the Van Swaraj Andolan in Raipur in 2019 and its sub-grants to organisations such as Josh (for social health) and Aman Biradari Trust.

It alleged that after the cancellation of its Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA) licence, Oxfam sought “puppet NGOs” with valid permissions to redirect funds for its causes. Furthermore, the I-T department said that Oxfam India had a “political agenda” and accused the NGO of focusing its efforts on benefiting a particular religious community, specifically the Muslim community, rather than serving the public as a whole.

Notably, Oxfam India has a tendency to work against the central government. On the international platform, Oxfam International is one of the front runners that has worked against the Adani Group in countries like Australia, where the company is investing in coal mines.

It may be recalled that last year, the Union Ministry of Home Affairs had recommended a CBI probe against Oxfam India over alleged violations of the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act. According to reports, a source in the Ministry of Home Affairs said, “Oxfam India continued to transfer Foreign Contributions to various entities even after coming into force of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Act, 2020 which prohibits such transfers. The amendment came into force on September 29, 2020. Oxfam India transferred funds to other NGOs, violating provisions of the FCRA, 2010.”

“Oxfam India received foreign contribution amounting to Rs 1.50 crore (approx) directly into its FC utilization account instead of receiving foreign contribution in designated FCRA account,” added the sources.

Oxfam India was registered under the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act 2010 (FCRA, 2010) for undertaking social activities and its registration certificate was valid up to December 31, 2021. The organisation’s FCRA license ceased on January 1, 2022, after it failed to apply for renewal.

In January last year, Oxfam India published a dubious report on how taxpayers are divided among income sections. OpIndia’s report on it can be read here.

IT letter says controversial think tank Centre for Policy Research received foreign funds of Rs 10.19 crore since 2016 

The 115-page letter from the Income Tax (I-T) department outlined several discrepancies related to fund collection and the management of foreign donations by the controversial Delhi-based think tank- Centre for Policy Research (CPR). It alleged that CPR was significantly involved in the Hasdeo movement against coal mining in Chhattisgarh, particularly through its association with the Jana Abhivyakti Samajik Vikas Sanstha (JASVS). According to the I-T department, a staggering 83% of the funds received by JASVS between 2019 and 2023 were sourced from CPR.

The letter further revealed that CPR received foreign funds amounting to Rs 10.19 crore since 2016 specifically for its Namati Environmental Justice Programme, which aims to file “litigation and complaints.” The I-T department characterised CPR as the sole associate of the US-based Namati Inc. in India, claiming that the programme’s ultimate objective is to pursue legal actions rather than conduct specified research or educational activities.

This raised concerns about the true intentions behind the funding and activities of CPR, suggesting a shift away from traditional non-profit objectives, prioritising litigation over community welfare.

For the uninitiated, a report by The Economic Times stated that during the period of October 2022-December 2022, CPR received funds amounting to Rs 10.1 crore from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the University of Pennsylvania, the World Resources Institute and Duke University.

The think tank is headed by Yamini Aiyar, the daughter of controversial Congress leader Mani Shankar Aiyar.

IT Dept accuses NGO LIFE of being utilized as a tool by the US-based NGO Earth Justice to impede coal mining and thermal power projects in India

The revelations contained within the Income Tax Department’s 86-page letter concerning the Legal Initiative for Forest and Environment (LIFE) Trust raised significant concerns about the organisation’s potential complicity in foreign agendas aimed at obstructing key developmental projects in India.

The letter alleged that LIFE is being utilized as a tool by the US-based NGO Earth Justice to impede coal mining and thermal power projects, casting doubt on the true motives behind its environmental advocacy.

According to the IT Department, communications between LIFE founder Ritwick Dutta and an Earth Justice official indicate that the organisation is aware of its questionable practices and the risks associated with them. Notably, an email purportedly authored by Dutta expresses apprehension about scrutiny from Indian intelligence agencies, highlighting a consciousness of potential legal repercussions tied to their actions. This acknowledgement suggests a troubling awareness of operating on the fringes of legality, as Dutta had previously run a proprietorship that received substantial funding from Earth Justice, amounting to approximately Rs 22 crore over five years.

Environics Trust got 100 per cent of its funds through foreign donations during three financial years — 2016-17, 2019-20 and 2020-21

Similarly, the IT department sent a 104-page letter to Environics Trust in which it outlined some serious allegations against the NGO regarding its funding activities and involvement in anti-corporate protests.

The letter stated that ET provided financial support for protests against the JSW Utkal Steel Plant in Odisha’s Dhinkia, with Rs 1,250 being transferred to the accounts of 711 local residents in 2020. This assertion suggested a coordinated effort to financially incentivise local opposition against significant industrial projects.

Furthermore, the letter alleged that ET colluded with the London-based Survival International to incite protests against Adani’s Godda Plant in Jharkhand, thereby aiming to bolster the anti-Adani movement.

It characterised these actions as a misuse of funds intended for community development, accusing the organization of deliberately stalling developmental projects in India.

Additionally, the letter pointed to ET’s involvement in protests against LG’s polymer chemical plant in Visakhapatnam, specifically following a gas leak incident in 2020. It alleged that an ET employee instigated various groups associated with the Trust to participate in the protests against LG, thereby exacerbating tensions surrounding environmental safety.

The I-T department further asserted that the European Climate Foundation (ECF), in collaboration with Environics Trust, is actively targeting coal and thermal power plants in India. It suggested that ECF is supplying funds with the intent to incite mobilisation and protests against major corporations, including government entities.

The Income Tax (I-T) Department’s investigations into Environics Trust (ET) reveal alarming insights into how the organisation has functioned as a conduit for foreign influence, primarily targeting India’s energy sector and obstructing the nation’s developmental agenda.

The allegations suggest that ET, through its funding and activities, has aligned itself with foreign entities, particularly the European Climate Foundation (ECF), to mobilise protests against significant industrial projects, including coal and thermal power plants. This raises critical questions about the accountability and objectives of such non-governmental organizations (NGOs) within the broader context of national interests.

How these NGOs worked in cahoots to jeopardize India’s economic development

Here it is worth mentioning that the IT department had in an affidavit submitted to the Supreme Court also confirmed that in the case of Environics Trust, survey action was carried out along with some other trusts like the Centre for Policy Research (CPR), Oxfam India, Legal Initiative for Forest and Environment (LIFE) and Care India Solution for Sustainable Development (CISSD) and it was seen that these organisations have close relations with each other.

Moreover, their main persons are interlinked and these NGOs are directly or indirectly involved in agitation or litigation beyond their objects, the department said.

The Income Tax (I-T) Department’s findings suggest a concerning nexus between the Environics Trust (ET) and the Legal Initiative for Forest and Environment (LIFE), both of which are accused of leveraging foreign funds to undermine India’s economic development.

According to the I-T Department, Ritwick Dutta, who leads LIFE, has been instrumental in representing ET in various legal challenges against the Union Government, ostensibly under the guise of environmental protection. However, the department alleged that these legal manoeuvres have primarily served to obstruct critical economic projects, particularly in the coal sector, rather than promote genuine environmental interests.

The department also said that both organizations are part of a broader strategy to impede coal projects in India, effectively stalling initiatives that are vital for the country’s energy needs and economic growth.

The findings from the Income Tax (I-T) Department further indicated a troubling relationship between Oxfam India and the Environics Trust (ET).

The department identified Oxfam India as a “key donor” that has funded ET specifically to mobilise local communities against coal industries, including support for protests like those in Dhinkia. The IT probe cited various banking transactions as evidence of this continuous financial support, concluding that ET functions effectively as a tool for Oxfam’s agitation-oriented activities.

Furthermore, the investigation highlighted a broader pattern of collaboration among various NGOs, including LIFE, Earth Justice, and Greenpeace, suggesting a coordinated effort to influence policy and mobilise public sentiment against developmental projects in India.

Such interconnectedness raises concerns about the potential for these NGOs to disrupt the country’s progress under the guise of environmental activism. As the investigation unfolds, it becomes increasingly important to scrutinize the motivations and activities of these organizations to ensure that their actions genuinely reflect the interests of the communities they claim to serve and that they adhere to the legal and ethical standards expected of NGOs in India.