Home Editor's picks Here are 4 lies being spread about 10% reservation to the economically backward section of society

Here are 4 lies being spread about 10% reservation to the economically backward section of society

The subject of reservations is a sensitive subject and any lie that gets furthered in its name can create unrest in the country. Hence, it becomes imperative to not only fact-check but ensures that these fallacious claims don't gather wind.

The Narendra Modi government, in a historic move, introduced the 124th constitutional amendment that paved the way for 10% reservation to economically backward people. Thought due to political considerations, several parties had to support the Bill, including Congress, several lies and misrepresentations started being furthered by these political parties and their supporters.

The subject of reservations is a sensitive subject and any lie that gets furthered in its name can create unrest in the country. Hence, it becomes imperative to not only fact-check but ensures that these fallacious claims don’t gather wind.

Lie 1: The 10% reservation will accrue only to upper castes or Savarnas

The mainstream media can be largely held responsible for spreading this lie. While before this Bill was tabled, most people were speculating whether the reservation would be limited to upper castes or would encompass the general category as a while, several media persons continued to spread this lie even after the Bill was tabled in the parliament.

- Ad - - article resumes -

Nistula Hebbar, senior journalist with The Hindu, said the reservations were for ‘uppar castes’ even thought she had tweeted a copy of the original bill moved in Parliament.

Other journalists and media houses too spread this lie liberally.

However, the truth is that in the Bill itself, the words ‘Upper caste’ finds no place at all. This 10% reservation is aimed at economically backward sections regardless of caste, creed and religion. Perhaos the journalists are peddling this fake news because now that it has been passed, the demands for caste based reservation and that of Muslim reservation would not find any traction or legal sanction. Any other category except the SC, ST, OBC etc would need to avail of the 10% quota if they meet the financial backwardness criteria.

Lie 2: Modi government is planning to eventually phase out reservation for SC, ST and OBCs

Several politicians including Arvind Kejriwal, Congress’ Jignesh Mevani and others spread the lie that ‘they had spoken to several people from RSS’ who had said that this 10% reservation for the poor is just a starting point. The BJP’s next step would be to phase out reservation for OBC, SC and ST. This lie was busted by us. 

The BJP government has reiterated several times that they do not intend to tamper with the existing 49.5% reservation already granted to socially weaker sections of the society.

Lie 3: The 10% reservation Bill breached the 50% reservation limit

We covered this aspect comprehensively too. The 10% reservation bill has been introduced by a Constitutional amendment that introduces Article 15 (6) and Article 16 (6). The 50% reservation limit pertains only to caste based reservation and this 10% reservation pertains the economically backward people which has never come up for discussion to begin with. Hence, the 50% reservation limit, that pertains only to caste based reservation according to the Indra Sawhney judgement, won’t get breached with this introduction of 10% reservation.

If at all the Bill is appealed in Supreme Court, the Court will have to evaluate the need for this 10% reservation independent of the 50% reservation limit set for socially backward classes.

Lie 4: ‘Individuals’ who earn less then Rs. 8 Lac per annum will be able to avail of this reservation

This is patently untrue. The Rs. 8 Lac per annum limit pertains to an entire family and not an individual. This limit is also in tune with the existing ‘creamy layer’ norms applicable to the 50% reservation for backward classes.

The ‘creamy layer’ criteria was defined as annual family income from all sources. n 1971, it was Rs. 1,00,000. Im 1993, it was increased to Rs. 2,50,000. It was revised against in 2004 to Rs. 4,50,000, Rs. 6,00,000 in 2013 and Rs. 8,00,000 in 2017.

The 10% reservation introduced by the Modi government adheres to the creamy layer criteria and hence, the metric is that of a family and not of an individual.

One must realise that for a family that earns Rs. 8 Lakh per annum, after standard deductions, the tax liability is miniscule. And hence, the argument that if a family pays that amount in tax they cannot be considered poor is incorrect.

One must also realise that inflation and cost of living has to be taken into account. How the Governemnt plans to impliment the scheme is another matter which has not yet been spelt out in clear terms, but these glaring lies which are politically motivated in order to create discord in the society must be called out.

Help Opindia Reach Every Indian. Share This Post
We need your support to survive in the media industry. Please consider paying us for the content we produce:

To know more about these payments, please click here.


Big Story

Ryszard Czarnecki of the ECR hailed India as the greatest democracy, said that terrorists in India didn’t land from the moon but from Pakistan

2019 World Cup Is Here!

Catch the latest on Cricket World Cup as it unfolds, special coverage by Opindia

To Advertise on Opindia.com Click here

‘Professional Congress’ member posts promotional tweets for 500 rupees, blames ‘social media manager’ after having defended tweet

Flipkart Big Billion Sale is here and well, 'Congress supporters' would like to earn a few quick bucks.

Tulsi Gabbard punctures fake news spread by ‘journalist’ Rana Ayyub and others about Howdy Modi event

The US Presidential candidate for 2020, Tulsi Gabbard, today took to Twitter to call out the lies being spread by a shady organisation 'Organisation for minorities in India (OFMI)'

Muslim student in Pakistan confesses he cooked up blasphemy charges against Hindu principal which led to violence on Hindus

Muslim mob unleashed violence against Hindu's in Ghotki, Pakistan, following the Muslim students false complaint against his Hindu principal

While talking about Muslims in Jammu, Karan Thapar diminishes massacre of Hindus and Sikhs in Jammu and the KP exodus

Karan Thapar in his article "We cannot be selective about the past in Jammu & Kashmir" in Hindustan Times dated 15th Sept 2019, gives a call to morality, intellectual honesty and being conscious to multiple peoples and their identities.

Sun TV fined Rs 2.5 lakh for telecasting a violent rape sequence in its prime time serial Kalyana Veedu

Sun TV and producers, Thiru Pictures in the hearing which was held last month, defended the serial and argued that they had taken precautions to make sure that the dialogues were not vulgar and obscene.

Congress’ AIPC member blames Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi for an incident of violence in Pakistan

All India Professionals' Congress member Andria D'Souza wants to hold PM Modi accountable for an incident in Pakistan

Go back to Southall slum: Hijabi woman goes on a racist rant at an Indian co-passenger in a over-crowded London bound bus

A Hijabi woman is seen launching a racist attack on an Indian co-passenger travelling in a crowded 195 bus from Romney Highway in Brentford, West London
S Jaishankar says PoK will be physically under India’s jurisdiction one day

PoK is part of India and one day we will have physical jurisdiction over it: External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar

EAM S Jaishankar stated that Pakistan occupied Kashmir will one day be under India’s jurisdiction

Did you see the Vikram Lander? Brad Pitt asks about lunar module to American astronaut on the ISS

Brad Pitt was in a conversation with NASA astronaut on the ISS as a part of promotion for his upcoming film Ad Astra

Digital Marketing company that used to pay Professional Congress troll says he won’t be assigning any ‘work’ to the ‘low-level influencer’

‘Professional Congress’ member, Andria D’souza, found herself in an embarrassing situation after it was revealed that she charges Rs 500 for tweeting promotional tweets.
Subscribe to Day's Top Stories
[newsletter_form type="minimal"]
- Advertisment -

Latest articles

Connect with us

182,808FansLike
180,661FollowersFollow
97,500SubscribersSubscribe
Help Opindia Reach Every Indian. Share This Post