HomeNews ReportsDid Pakistan sell out Ummah in exchange for a lunch with Trump?

Did Pakistan sell out Ummah in exchange for a lunch with Trump?

Amid US airstrikes on Iran’s nuclear sites, online users draw parallels with the Osama raid and claim Pakistan may have offered silent support in hopes of military deals and economic benefits.

On 21st June, the United States launched coordinated military strikes on three of Iran’s top nuclear sites, Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan. It triggered a fresh wave of geopolitical tensions in the Middle East. The strikes, which were reportedly executed with high-precision munitions, “bunker busters”, left key infrastructure in ruins. President Donald Trump claimed the strike was successful, however, Iran has claimed that the infrastructure sustained minimal damage. Overall, it has definitely crippled Iran’s nuclear ambitions, at least for some time.

While official statements from Washington have so far not detailed the operational support received, it is being speculated that Pakistan might have played a crucial role in the strikes by giving access to its airspace to the United States. While the role of Pakistan is unclear, its history has led to speculations that it would side with the US hoping to get monetary and weapon support in the future. Not to forget, President Trump has already said the US will have trade deals with Pakistan and it might include fighter jets, drones and weapons.

Did Pakistan serve Osama Bin Laden on a silver plate to the US?

The notorious terrorist of Al-Qaeda, Osama Bin Laden, who was behind the infamous 9/11 terrorist attack in New York, was killed in Pakistan in May 2011. It is widely believed that Pakistani authorities were unaware of the US strike to kill Osama in Abbottabad. However, it is hard to believe that the Pakistani government did not provide any support to the US authorities to locate Osama, who had been hiding in Pakistan for years.

Similarly, an operation of this scale conducted by the US against Iran, a country which is in proximity to Pakistan’s west, is not easy to be done without the help of Pakistan. Notably, Pakistan’s Army Chief Asif Munir was in the US on the invitation of Trump. Something must have been said that could have pushed Pakistan to backstab Iran, an Islamic nation, and help the US to strike it. Someone might have opened Pakistan’s airspace, and it was not Allah.

Selling out the ‘brotherly’ neighbour?

If Pakistan has helped the US, it will be the biggest irony of the Islamic nation as Pakistan publicly sermonises on Islamic brotherhood but aids missions that destabilise fellow Muslim nations. Could Pakistan have sold out Ummah for a Happy Meal, “once again after Osama Bin Laden, after Afghanistan”? At this rate, even Yemen should watch its airspace.

It is possible that Pakistan’s troubled economy and fear of Indian strikes were the motivation. A few diplomatic handshakes and promises of financial aid might have sealed Islamabad’s support for the US in the strikes.

What role could Pakistan have played?

Though speculative, there are several logistical avenues through which Pakistan could have aided the US strike without overt participation. These include:

• Allowing temporary access to air corridors.

• Ground intelligence relays from shared sources in the region.

• Passive silence, failing to alert Iran about unusual US military activity.

None of these leave a direct fingerprint, but Pakistan’s silence on the matter definitely raises eyebrows.

Join OpIndia's official WhatsApp channel

  Support Us  

For likes of 'The Wire' who consider 'nationalism' a bad word, there is never paucity of funds. They have a well-oiled international ecosystem that keeps their business running. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

Anurag
Anuraghttps://lekhakanurag.com
Anurag is a Chief Sub Editor at OpIndia with over twenty one years of professional experience, including more than five years in journalism. He is known for deep dive, research driven reporting on national security, terrorism cases, judiciary and governance, backed by RTIs, court records and on-ground evidence. He also writes hard hitting op-eds that challenge distorted narratives. Beyond investigations, he explores history, fiction and visual storytelling. Email: [email protected]

Related Articles

Trending now

‘Desecrating Ganga could hurt religious sentiments of Hindus’: What Allahabad HC said while granting bail to Muslim youths in Varanasi iftar case. Details inside

Now, when the Allahabad High Court has said that throwing bones and other non-veg food leftovers in the sacred Ganga River can hurt Hindu religious sentiments, the same Islamo-leftist cabal is selectively highlighting only the Muslim accused getting bail part.

How did Imran Khan go from the chosen leader to the fallen prisoner? The cypher, regime change, and establishment that is controlled by the...

In keeping with his long-standing 'absolutely not' attitude against allowing US military activities on Pakistani territory, Khan presented Pakistan's stance as principled neutrality, a reluctance to take sides in a conflict between world powers. Donald Lu met with Pakistan's ambassador in Washington two weeks later, on March 7, 2022, and expressed his thoughts in unusually forthright words for diplomatic standards.
- Advertisement -