Home Blog Page 1756

Canadian Immigration Minister lets slip that Nijjar was given citizenship after Interpol Notice was issued against him, later says he made an error in dates

0

On 20th September (local time), Canada’s Immigration Minister Marc Miller claimed he had made a mistake while mentioning the date when Khalistani terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar got Canadian citizenship. Initially Miller said that Nijjar got Canadian citizenship in March 2015, months after a Red Corner Notice (RCN) was issued against Nijjar by Interpol. Later, correcting himself, Miller tweeted, “Mr Nijjar became a Canadian citizen on 25th May 2007, earlier than I stated below. The error in dates is my responsibility to assume. Again, nothing justifies the killing of Mr Nijjar.” Notably, the “error” Miller made was of eight long years.

Notably, an RCN means that the country where the accused is located should arrest and deport them. However, if the mentioned date of 3rd March 2015 was correct, Canada expedited his citizenship only after RCN was issued against Nijjar. As per reports, during the discussions with the Indian Government, it was highlighted that Canada accepted Nijjar’s citizenship application several months after the initial RCN was issued on 14th November 2014.

The first RCN was issued after the Punjab Police registered a case (FIR No. 159) against Hardeep Singh Nijjar at the Kotwali police station in Patiala. Later, in 2016, a second RCN was issued in FIR No. 19 filed at the Nurpur police station in Ropar.

Indian agencies are sceptical of Miller’s latest assertion as the issue of Nijjar’s citizenship had already been raised with Canada and Interpol. Furthermore, Indian authorities have questioned how Nijjar was able to reside in Canada between 1997 and 2015. In 1997, Nijjar arrived in Toronto using a fraudulent passport in the name of ‘Ravi Sharma’. His immigration followed a raid in 1996 at his uncle’s residence in Uttar Pradesh. Nijjar had been hiding there after being detained by the Punjab Police in 1995.

In June of 1998, Nijjar presented an affidavit and medical records that detailed incidents of alleged torture he had suffered in India. However, despite his plea, Canadian authorities rejected his claim as there were discrepancies in the documents he presented. Less than two weeks after his claim was denied, Nijjar married a woman who sponsored him on 21st November 1998. Immigration officials observed that his wife had come to Canada in 1997, sponsored by a different husband.

Canada blamed India of killing Khalistani terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar on Canadian soil

On 18th September, in a bizarre move, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau blamed India for killing Khalistani terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar in Canada. In a statement, India categorically rejected the claims and urged the Canadian government to take strict action against anti-India elements on its soil. Interestingly, PM Trudeau accused India in the Canadian parliament of killing Nijjar without providing any proof.

Hardeep Singh Nijjar was a Khalistani terrorist wanted by the Indian government. The 46-year-old hailed from the village Bhar Singhpura of Jalandhar. He was recently added to the list of designated terrorists by the Indian Government. In 2022, the National Investigation Agency (NIA) declared a Rs 10 lakh reward on Nijjar after his name appeared in a conspiracy to kill a Hindu priest in Jalandhar, Punjab. The Khalistan Tiger Force (KTF) was behind the conspiracy to kill the Hindu priest. Nijjar was the chief of the Khalistani terrorist organization KTF. Apart from his activities in KTF, Nijjar was also linked to the Khalistani terrorist organization Sikhs For Justice.

Canada: Gangster Sukha alias Sukhdool Singh killed in Winnipeg by unknown persons, a day after featuring in NIA’s wanted list

Gangster Sukhdool Singh alias Sukha has been killed in Canada by unknown gunmen. Sukhdool Singh was known as ‘Sukha Duneke’ and has been on a wanted list by India.

Sukha had fled from India in 2017 with the help of forged documents. He hailed from Moga district of Punjab. He was linked with the Davinder Bambiha gang.

Unconfirmed reports have stated that unknown assailants shot Sukha in what appears to be an inter-gang clash in Canada’s Winnipeg.

Interestingly, Sukha’s name was on the list of wanted criminals shared by NIA on September 20. The names included criminals engaged in terror-gangster acts against India.

Sukha’s name appeared in the NIA list

As per reports, Sukha’s murder has been cited as similar to that of Khalistani terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar in June this year, for which Canada is now blaming India.

Sukha’s name was on the list of 43 wanted criminals released by NIA. 29 gangsters from the Punjab region feature in the list.

Sukha appeared at Number 33 on the NIA’s list.

“Persons shown in the photos below are accused in the NIA Cases RC-38/2022/NIA/DLI or RC-39/2022/NIA/DLI. If you have any information about properties/assets/ business owned by them in their name or in the name of their associates, friends & relatives, please WhatsApp DM @ +91 7290009373,” the NIA had posted on X.

UP: Mohd Asim kills ex-girlfriend Ayesha’s grandfather Ghulam Ahmad, gets lynched by locals in Ambedkar Nagar

0

On Wednesday, September 20, a 25-year-old man named Mohammed Asim killed the grandfather of a girl he had gone to meet in the Ambedkar Nagar district of Uttar Pradesh. Asim stabbed Ayesha Noor’s grandfather Ghulam Ahmed multiple times after he saw and rebuked him at his house in Jhajhwa village late Tuesday night.

According to police, Mohammed Asim was allegedly stalking the girl and arrived at her home in Jhajhwa village under Hanswar police station precinct with his accomplices. In addition to stabbing her 70-year-old grandfather, he injured the girl and her parents. Police said that both Asim and Ghulam Ahmed were rushed to the hospital after UP 112 and a police team arrived, however, the two were declared brought dead.

Hanswar SHO Arun Saroj said that accused Mohammed Asim demanded to see Ayesha adding that Asim was pressurising Ayesha to marry him. However, Ghulam Ahmad refused to allow him to meet Ayesha, agitated by this, Asim stabbed the 70-year-old. As Ghulam Ahmad screamed, Asim’s aide Salman who was waiting outside the house fled the spot.

Reportedly, Asim and Ayesha were in a relationship, however, the two had broken up a month ago. The girl told the accused that she was getting married. Despite the breakup, Asim continued to allegedly harass the girl.

The police said that an FIR was registered against Asim and Salman on the basis of a complaint lodged by the girl’s father Hilal Ahmad. The accused duo was booked under 302 (murder), 307 (attempt to murder) and 324 (causing hurt by use of dangerous weapon) of the IPC.

Meanwhile, Ayodhya Range Inspector General (IG) Praveen Kumar said that Mohammed Asim (some reports say Azim) entered the girl’s house on Tuesday-Wednesday midnight at around 1:30 am while his accomplices waited outside for security. IG Kumar said that initial investigation suggests that Asim did not forcibly enter the girl’s house adding that somebody opened the door for him. However, as the girl’s family members noticed an intruder inside their home, they confronted Asim. Following this, Mohammed Asim stabbed the girl’s grandfather multiple times and injured the girl’s mother Tehsib Fatima and father Hilal Ahmad as well.

IG Kumar further informed that the local villagers soon gathered at the spot and caught hold of him. Asim was then tied to a pillar and thrashed resulting in his death. Meanwhile, the three injured persons are undergoing treatment at a district hospital.

Samajwadi Party leader Swami Prasad Maurya again uses derogatory language against Hinduism, claims Hindu means ‘thief’ in Persian

0

Samajwadi Party leader Swami Prasad Maurya continued his rants against Hinduism. In the latest episode of his tirade, he claimed the word ‘Hindu’ means ‘thief’ and ‘despicable’ in Persian. Maurya was speaking during an event at Gandhi Bhawan in Hardoi district under “Samvidhan and Arakshan Sarakshan Sena” on 19th September.

Swami Prasad Maurya said, “How can Hinduism be a religion? The word Hindu originates in Persian, which means thief, despicable and lowly.”

He further said that Bharat was never a Hindu Rashtra; it is not a Hindu Rashtra and can never be a Hindu Rashtra. Maurya said, “Those who demand Hindu Rastra are anti-constitution. They are anti-democracy. They are anti-tribals, anti-dalits and anti-backwards. Stay away from them. We have worked for a long time to get our constitution”.

Swami Prasad Maurya did not stop there and attacked Brahmins as well during his address. He said, “Brahmins say they were born from Brahma’s mouth. They do not believe to have been born from their mother’s womb. Have you ever seen someone being born from mouth? Have you ever seen Kshtriyas being born from an arm and Vaishyas from a foot? There is a way children are born, and the process is the same in every country. These people have created their own rules.”

Maurya further targeted Prime Minister Narendra Modi and accused him of trying to take credit for the Chandrayaan-3 landing and the G20 Summit. He said, “PM knows he is not coming back in 2024; that’s why he called a special session (to take credit).” He further questioned naming the landing site as “Shiv Shakti” and said it should have been named after a scientist.

Swami Prasad Maurya and his history of controversial statements

This is not the first time Maurya made headlines because of his controversial statements. In August this year, in a post on X, he wrote, “The roots of Brahminism are very deep, and the reason for all the disparity is also Brahminism itself. There is no religion called Hindu, Hinduism is just a hoax. This is a conspiracy to trap this country’s Dalits, tribals, and backward people by calling the same Brahmin religion as the Hindu religion. If there was Hindu religion, tribals would have been respected, Dalits would have been respected, and backward people would have been respected, but what an irony.” 

Earlier, in January 2023, the SP leader claimed that certain portions of the Ramcharitmanas “insult” a large section of society on the basis of caste. He claimed that the religious text was “all nonsense” and that it should be “banned”. On January 22, while speaking to a news channel, he said that Ramcharitamanas, written by Goswami Tulsidas in the 17th century, promoted social discrimination and spread hatred.

During a conversation with Aaj Tak, he said, “Crores of people do not read Ramcharitmanas. All this is rubbish. Tulsidas wrote this for his own pleasure.”

He added, “Religion is meant for humanity’s welfare and strengthening it. If there is any insult to a section of society due to certain lines in the Ramcharitamanas on the basis of ‘jaati’, ‘varn’ and ‘varg’, then it is certainly not ‘dharma’, it is ‘adharma’. There are certain lines in which names of castes such as ‘teli’ and ‘kumhaar’ are mentioned.” 

Following his controversial remarks against Ramchatritramanas, many FIRs were filed against him. 

Recently, he stirred another controversy when a question was posed to him regarding the statement of Dhirendra Krishna Shastri in which the Peethadhishwar of Bageshwar Dham asserted that India should now become a Hindu nation. He said India has never been a Hindu Rashtra and can’t now be a Hindu Rashtra. 

Justin Trudeau’s security team created drama during G20, refused to let him stay in the secure Presidential Suite and chose a normal room instead: Report

During the G20 summit, the security team of Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau created a ruckus over a Presidential Suite, according to a Times of India report. The security team of the Canadian Prime Minister refused to let him stay in the Presidential Suite, which was arranged for him in accordance with security protocols and standards laid down for the heads of state during the G20 summit which concluded two weeks ago.

Justin Trudeau was staying at The Lalit, one of the finest hotel properties in Delhi. The Presidential Suite of the hotel had bulletproof glass with a thick layer of polycarbonate plastic, which could even stop sniper bullets. The room, which had an advanced security shield, was unacceptable to the security team of Justin Trudeau.

According to the report, the drama continued when the security team of Justin Trudeau opted to stay in a normal room at The Lalit instead of the Presidential Suite. This sent the Indian security personnel in a tizzy, since the normal rooms did not have the protective shield the Presidential Suite had.

After the fiasco, there were multiple rounds of negotiations between the Indian security personnel and the Canadian team, however, upon their insistence, India had to let Justin Trudeau stay in a normal room since the ultimate decision rests with the visiting dignitary and his embassy.

The report in Times of India further revealed that the Canadian team offered to pay both for the Presidential Suite and the normal room in which they had chosen to stay. This offer was rejected by India.

The pull aside talk between PM Modi and Justin Trudeau and the issue of Khalistan

Prime Minister Narendra Modi met with his Canadian counterpart Prime Minister Justin Trudeau during a pull-aside talk on the sidelines of the G20 Summit which was taking place in Delhi, India.

During this pull-aside meeting, the Indian PM conveyed strong concerns of India over the continuous anti-India activities by Khalistanis in Canada. PM Modi pointed out the use of Canadian soil for anti-India and Hinduphobic activities by pro-Khalistan elements.

The issue has been brought up several times in the past but the Canadian government has turned a blind eye to India’s concerns.

Only 2 MPs voted against the Women’s Reservation Bill, Asaduddin Owaisi and Imtiaz Jaleel, this is the reason they gave

 With 454 votes ‘for’ and 2 ‘against’, the Women’s Reservation Bill cleared its first legislative hurdle with a brute majority in the Lok Sabha. However, All India Majlis-E-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) MP Asaduddin Owaisi, who voted against the motion seeking the Bill’s passage, along with party colleague Imtiaz Jaleel, defended their opposition to the draft legislation saying that it does not provide for a sub-quota for Muslim and Other Backward Classes (OBC) women.

Speaking to ANI after the landmark passage of the Bill in the Lok Sabha, Owaisi said, “We voted against it so that the country knows that there are two members of Parliament, who are fighting for the inclusion of OBC and Muslim in the quota ambit.”

Explaining his rationale for voting against the motion for the passage of the women’s reservation Bill, AIMIM chief said, “OBC people account for more than 50% of the country’s population. The idea behind this Bill is to provide for those women, who are not adequately represented in the Parliament and other legislative bodies. Why is the government then denying reservation to women from a community, which makes up more than 50% of our population?”

On the alleged denial of reservation for Muslim women, Owaisi said, “Muslim women account for 7% of the national population but their representation in our legislative bodies, including the Parliament, is just 0.7%”

Earlier, on Wednesday, the Lok Sabha passed the draft women’s reservation legislation, which provides for 33% reservation for women in Lok Sabha and state assemblies. The Constitution (One Hundred and Twenty-Eighth Amendment) Bill, 2023, was passed after a reply to the motion by Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal.

The Bill was passed following division, with 454 members voting in favor of the legislation and two against it on the motion for the passage moved by Meghwal.

Individual clauses of the Bill were also voted on.

Speaker Om Birla announced that the Bill had been passed.

The ‘Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam’ is the first Bill passed by Lok Sabha after it shifted to the new Parliament building on Tuesday. 

(This news report is published from a syndicated feed. Except for the headline, the content has not been written or edited by OpIndia staff)

A year after anti-Hijab protests, Iran’s parliament passes ‘hijab and chastity’ bill, women could face 10 years in jail for ‘inappropriate’ dress

0

A year after women in Iran came out to protest against the mandatory Hijab law after the murder of Mahsa Amini, the Iranian parliament passed a ‘hijab and chastity’ bill on Wednesday (20 September). The bill seeks to increase jail terms and fines for women and girls who ‘flout’ Tehran’s strict dress code. As per the bill, girls/women who dress “inappropriately” could face up to 10 years in jail. 

The bill was introduced in the Iranian parliament in May following the death of 22-year-old Iranian woman Mahsa Amini while in police custody last year on 16 September. 

As per the judiciary’s Mizan news, the bill has been approved for a three-year trial period. According to media reports, the lawmakers were split regarding the trial period with some even proposing it to be five years. However, they agreed on a trial period of three years, after which it will become a permanent law

The bill contains more than 70 articles and it was passed with 152 votes in favour, 34 against, and seven abstentions. However, to become a law, it would still need to be approved by the Guardian Council, a conservative body of clerics and jurists that is largely controlled by Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. If they consider the bill inconsistent with the constitution and Sharia, the Council has the power to veto it.

According to Iranian law, based on the country’s interpretation of Sharia, women and girls above the age of puberty have to cover their hair with a hijab and wear long, loose-fitting clothing to disguise their figures. Currently, women who do not comply with the dress code face a maximum prison term of two months or a fine of up to 500,000 rials ($10.14). 

However, the bill passed by the Iranian parliament will drastically increase the punishment. As per the bill, women who would be caught dressed “inappropriately” in public places will be subject to a “fourth-degree” punishment. According to the penal code, it would mean a prison sentence ranging between five and 10 years along with a fine of up to 360m rials ($7,302).

According to the AFP news agency, the bill proposes fines for those “promoting nudity” or “making fun of the hijab” in the media and on social networks. Additionally, the fine will also be imposed on owners of vehicles in which a female driver or passenger would be found not wearing the hijab or dressed appropriately.

Further, as per the bill, any person who promotes violating the dress code “in an organised manner” or “in co-operation with foreign or hostile governments, media, groups or organisations” could also be imprisoned for between five and 10 years.

Broadcasters will have to show programmes “to introduce and promote the symbols and patterns of the family-oriented Islamic lifestyle” and “the culture of chastity and hijab,” according to the full version of the bill published by the IRGC-affiliated Fars news agency, reported National News. 

Furthermore, business owners who would be found ‘guilty’ of serving women without the hijab will also face a travel ban. As per media reports, offices responsible for University admissions will also have to take chastity and the hijab into account while selecting students.

Despite the return of the morality police to the streets and the installation of surveillance cameras, many women continue to defy Iran’s dress code and appear in public without the mandatory hijab. 

However, in recent months, Iran has announced several measures to clamp down on women’s freedoms. This includes barring women without the hijab from universities and their workplaces. Following the installation of surveillance cameras, Iranian authorities have confiscated vehicles from women driving without a hijab in their own cars. 

Earlier this month, eight independent UN human rights experts described the bill as a form of “gender apartheid”. The experts said, “The bill also violates fundamental rights, including the right to take part in cultural life, the prohibition of gender discrimination, freedom of opinion and expression, the right to peaceful protest, and the right to access social, educational, and health services, and freedom of movement.”

A great critique of propaganda warfare: Binay Kumar Singh’s book, ‘The Elastic War’ exposes undisclosed facts about outlawed PFI

0

In the month of September last year, the National Investigation Agency (NIA) began its operation dubbed ‘Operation Octopus’ and raided no less than 100 locations of the Islamist terrorist organization named the Popular Front of India (PFI). The raids executed in multiple locations across the country resulted in around 250 arrests of persons associated with PFI and a ban on eight other organizations closely associated with the PFI.

On September 28, 2022, the Ministry of Home Affairs imposed a ban on PFI and organizations including All India Imams Council, Campus Front of India (CFI), Rehab India Foundation, National Conf of Human Rights Org, National Women’s Front, Junior Front, Empower India Foundation, and Rehab Foundation, Kerala. In its official statement, the Central government said that the organizations had been operating openly as socio-economic, educational, and political organizations, but they had been pursuing a secret agenda to show disrespect to the constitutional setup of the country. The government also indicated that the organizations had been attempting to radicalize a particular section of society towards undermining the concept of democracy.

It’s been a year since the ban and within this one year, the NIA has conducted multiple raids across the country and arrested several hundred members of the banned organization ensuring that no unlawful activity takes place in the country post-ban.

Demonstrating the entire account of the incident and exposing the PFI and its associate groups for possessing dangerous Islamist, terrorist ideologies, Author Binay Kumar Singh, associated with BJP Jharkhand, has come up with a new book named ‘The Elastic War: Story of Popular Front of India’. The book is all set for its official launch on September 28 this year marking one year of ban imposed on the terrorist organization.

PFI raised money through the Rehab India Foundation; Imams, women, and children were trained

The author, while exposing the dangerous ideology of the Islamist terrorist organization, also exposes its affiliate banned organizations and the medium through which they assisted the PFI in furthering its propaganda. The PFI raised funds through the Rehab India Foundation (RIF) was established in the year 2018 with the aim of helping the marginalized section of rural India. The RIF later adopted 60 villages in India and its chairman E Abubacker, was also the chairman of the PFI. The ED seized 33 bank accounts linked to the RIF which were used to raise funds for the terrorist organization.

Another banned affiliate, the National Confederation of Human Rights Organization (NCHRO) was established in May 1997 and its task was to prepare biased fact-finding reports on sensitive issues that created massive tensions among two communities, an objective in line with the PFI’s decisive agenda.

The National Women’s Front trained women on ‘how to protest’ tactics while through the Junior Front, school-going children were often made part of radicalised religious and communal protest. The first-of-its-kind organization, the Junior Front taught the school-going children to be at the forefront of the protests and raise objectionable slogans in communal protests.

Further, the Imams were also trained through the banned All India Imam Council (AIIC) who were well-versed in the ideologies possessed by the PFI. The protests held by the AIIC against the arrest of Maulana Kareem Siddiqui who was accused of operating a conversion syndicate also has been highlighted by the author in the book.

How PFI prospered?

Binay Kumar Singh through this book allows the readers to understand all the basic laws relating to the ban and the punishments followed. It explains the powers the government holds to deal with such radical Islamist terrorist organizations who attempted to pose a threat to Indian democracy. The author sheds light on why and how PFI was different from other terrorist organizations and why the organization prospered.

“PFI provided a platform to the vulnerable minds of the country to recognize and comprehend the tactics of terror organizations that have predominantly transitioned to the 5th Generation Warfare techniques. PFI was a puppet of foreign powers seeking to disrupt and hamper the progress of the New Bharat. Its true agenda was regimentation and violent extremism,” the book reads in its second chapter.

It also highlights how PFI received support from major terrorist organizations that were declared illegal between 2001 and 2010 which helped the organization set its ground in the country. It strategically used violence to attract funding from the Gulf countries. The organization merged and allied with similar thinking groups and expanded its network to root its cause into the minds of vulnerable people, the book indicates.

PFI’s hatred towards Hindus, furthering the anti-India narrative in urban areas

The author further goes on to showcase PFI’s hatred towards Hindus. The units in PFI believed that Hindus were communalists and fascists which led to the sharp segregation of the Muslim community. Singh further moves to specify that similar agendas by similar organizations also led Dalits, Sikhs, and Christians against the Hindu communities. The initiative which began by targeting the rural population, slowly began to reach the urban localities that later began spreading the anti-India narrative, the book signifies.

Binay Kumar Singh’s study and research come to the fore as he dives into the historical background of the PFI and its ideologies. He narrates how the organization adopted its working style from several other unlawful terrorist organizations, merged with similar thinking groups, and together routed the thinking to the urban regions leading to the participation of several anti-India heads in the protests like the anti-CAA protests or the Bhima Koregaon violence. “As a strategy, the PFI very tactfully attempted to align Dalits along with Muslims, portraying both of them as victims of the Indian government,” the book quotes.

It moves to feature various recent campaigns projects and mergers by PFI and its allies towards their only agenda, which was to make India an Islamic Nation by the year 2047, when the country will complete 100 years of its Independence.

PFI wanted India to become an Islamic nation and encouraged Islamists to target Hindu women

Last year during the raids, NIA recovered several incriminating materials from the PFI hideouts across the nation. The material seized by the NIA included Pen drives having videos of Gajwa-e-Hind, the 1993 Bombay riots, provocative speeches, and a few video clips from the Islamic States. The NIA also recovered the ‘Mission 2047’ document which showed that PFI had plans to establish Islamic rule in the country by 2047, the year that would mark 100 years of the country’s independence. Some GPS-enabled wireless communication devices and marine radio sets were also seized by the NIA.

The investigating agencies in 2022 also revealed that the PFI activists were deliberately encouraging the Islamists to trap Hindu women in love affairs and produce more children ultimately expanding the Muslim community. The PFI, when active asked its cadres and other Muslims to force the Hindu women to convert their religion to Islam. At every PFI gathering, the activists would influence Muslims to run the agenda of love jihad and religious conversion. The organization had also declared a financial reward of Rs 2 lakh, a shop, and a house to anyone who would convert a Hindu girl to Islam. Reports mention that several Islamic organizations from several Islamic countries provided funds to the PFI for this purpose.

Utilizing mass media to build anti-India lobby

Notably, the PFI also used the medium of mass media to set the narrative against India and voice their cause whenever necessary. It very well-coordinated and planned orchestra of the anti-India lobby. Publications like Unarvu (weekly), Egathuvam (monthly), Vivekam in Malayalam, Sedhi Mandal in Tamil, Rupantar in Bengali, Iqraa in Gujarathi, Tahreek in Hindi, Al Harkah in Urdu, and the Shaheen Times prospered the hate against Hindus and India in the minds of the readers.

The book also exhibits how the PFI and its affiliate organizations and other terrorist organizations targeted the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) members killing many of its members from across the country. It was reported that the PFI activists had shortlisted 100 BJP and RSS activists alone from Kerala for murder. This was revealed during the investigation of the murder of RSS activist SK Sreenivasan last year. The book also brings out the involvement of the PFI in Shimoga violence, Anti-CAA protests, Easter Bombings in Sri Lanka, Magaluru violence, Hathras rape case, Kerala gold smuggling racket, and many more such events.

Why to read The Elastic War?

The author says that the organization involved in the ‘Elastic model’ of battle can change its shape and size according to the situation. He also called for the need to adopt an ‘elastic defence’ to deal with this new mode of warfare. “There is a need to start to counter the tactics through counter-insurgency measures. There has been a need to counter this warfare at the intellectual level too,” the author adds.

Today, narratives determine politics, and agendas determine narratives. This is exemplified by recent anti-CAA riots, protests against the Agniveer program, farmer’s protests, and so on. We are living at a time when information is being weaponized to cause havoc in society, with aggressive forces using covert and overt propaganda outlets to exacerbate the faultlines in Indian society. Propaganda warfare is a mind-hacking technique in which the target gives up the ability to think critically.

The Elastic War: Story of the Popular Front of India, by Binay Kumar Singh, is a great critique of propaganda warfare. The book uses PFI as a model case to study propaganda warfare and dissects how neo-terror outfits implement transformative changes and have mastered the next-generation modus operandi of warfare.

Traditional methods make it difficult to decipher terrorist organizations like the PFI. These sophisticated groups have mastered the technique of weaponizing propaganda and are eventually perfecting the art of “Elastic Warfare.” They can change their appearances, sizes, and tactics in response to external pressures. The book appears to be a valuable counter-weapon in our nation’s internal security armoury.

The book has been written by Binay Kumar Singh and has been published by Garuda Prakashan Private Limited. It is scheduled to be released on September 28 this year, on the occasion of the completion of one year of the ban imposed on PFI. The 200-page book carries a foreword by YC Modi, former director general of the National Investigation Agency (NIA). The book has also been praised by Vikram Singh (IPS), Former DGP, Uttar Pradesh, SM Sahay (IPS), former additional secretary, NSCS and RVS Mani, Former Under Secretary, MHA.

AAP Government in Delhi demands joint meeting of NCR states on stubble burning issue

0

The Delhi government has written to the Centre to conduct a joint meeting of the NCR states on stubble burning.

Delhi Environment Minister Gopal Rai has written a letter to Union Environment Minister Bhupendra Yadav and Union Agriculture Minister Narendra Singh Tomar on this issue highlighting that despite an earlier meeting on August 3, incidents of stuble burning have started again.

“Last August 3, you had held a meeting with the concerned ministers of the NCR state regarding stubble burning, but the incident of stubble burning has started again, hence there is a need to hold a review meeting with all the concerned states immediately,” he wrote in his letter.

“Therefore, you are humbly requested to convene a review meeting of the concerned states as per your convenience, so that a meaningful joint action plan can be made and the incident of stubble burning can be stopped,” he added.

Referring to the increase in pollution levels in Delhi during the winter season, Gopal Rai has written, “…until the incident of stubble burning is stopped in the NCR states, all these steps taken will not be effective” adding that “the situation of air pollution in Delhi becomes serious during winter season.”

On the efforts undertaken by the Delhi government to curb air pollution, Gopal Rai said, “Delhi government is taking various steps under Winter Action Plan to reduce pollution, such as spraying of Pusa biodecomposer, anti dust campaign, special campaign for hot spots, anti open burning campaign etc.”

“The steps taken by the government have resulted in a 42 percent reduction in PM 10 and 46 percent reduction in PM 2.5 in the last nine years,” he added.


(This news report is published from a syndicated feed. Except for the headline, the content has not been written or edited by OpIndia staff)

‘No place for artist propagating divisive content’, short video platform Moj takes down songs by Canadian singer and Khalistani sympathiser Shubh

Another Indian brand has disassociated with Canadian singer and Khalistani sympathiser Shubhneet Singh aka Shubh amid a widespread outrage around his India tour which was cancelled today. Evidently, on Wednesday (20 September), the Indian short video-sharing platform Moj, owned by Sharechat, announced that it has taken down songs by Shubh. 

Taking to X, the parent organisation, Sharechat made the announcement.

In its official statement, the video-sharing platform asserted that it is a proud Indian brand committed to supporting the creator community. It categorically stated that there is no space for artists propagating divisive content on its platform. 

The official release said, “Moj is a proud Indian brand deeply committed to fostering a vibrant creator community. In alignment with our values, any artist propagating divisive content has no home on our platform.” 

As a result, the platform announced that it has taken down his songs from its music library. 

It added, “With this in mind, we have taken down songs by the artist Shubh from our in-app music library. We are dedicated to providing our community with joyful moments that reflect our world.” 

Earlier, in the day, Shubh’s India tour was cancelled following mounting anger amongst Indian citizens against the Khalistani supporter. Online event ticketing website BookMyShow took to X to notify its users about the refund of the ticket amount to those who paid for the concert.

The development came just hours after netizens were trending the hashtag #UninstallBookMyShow on the social media platform X. 

Notably, his shows were scheduled from the 23rd to the 25th of September at Cordelia Cruises in Mumbai.

Earlier on 19 September, another Indian brand boAt had announced its decision to withdraw its sponsorship from Shubh’s India tour. 

On 19 September, Indian consumer electronic brand boAt withdrew its sponsorship for Shubh’s concert

Moreover, on 16 September, the Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha (BJYM) workers in Mumbai removed posters of his concert calling for the organisers to cancel the event. The BJYM categorically stated that there is no place for any Khalistan supporter in this country.

On 23 March 2023, Shubhneet Singh posted a story on his Instagram account captioned “Pray for Punjab” showing a distorted map of India. He posted a photo of the map without the union territory of Jammu and Kashmir, Punjab, and North-eastern states. The Canadian singer did this at a time when the Punjab Police was on the lookout to nab Khalistani terrorist Amritpal Singh. Shubh had openly supported Khalistani elements at the time.

Moreover, cricketers Virat Kohli, KL Rahul and Hardik Pandya have also unfollowed the Khalistani supporter on Instagram. The cancellation of the Canadian singer’s event in India, sends a message that Indians are no longer ready to let ‘celebrities’ get away with disrespecting the country.