Home Blog Page 506

Ex-judge, who earlier released ‘urban naxal’ Gautam Navlakha from house arrests, speaks out against anti-conversion laws in India: Details

On 28th February this year, former judge S Muralidhar courted controversy by claiming that laws against deceitful and forced conversions are ‘anti-choice.’ He made the remarks during a panel discussion on anti-conversion laws in the country.

S Muralidhar, who retired as the Chief Justice of the High Court of Orissa, said, “These anti-conversion laws are not so much a law against forced conversions, but are laws against the freedom of choice.”

“There is a presumption in all these laws that if a person belonging or born into a certain religion decides to embrace another religion, then such a decision must be due to some kind of intimidation,” he further claimed.

S Muralidhar continued, “This basic presumption explains why the law shifts the burden of proof onto the person who’s charged with converting another against the person’s will.”

He alleged that anti-conversion laws are targeted against Dalits and minorities.

The retired judge claimed, “Now, a Dalit seeking to embrace Buddhism will now have to explain to a district magistrate why they are making that choice. They’ll have to first of all announce to the whole world…One can reasonably argue that after the Puttaswamy privacy judgement, this kind of a law should not withstand legal scrutiny because it straight away hits at the freedom of choice, freedom of privacy, choice of religion, of course but what goes along with religion.”

S Muralidhar also objected to the fact that people other than the victim of forced conversion can also file complaints. He alleged that this provision in anti-conversion laws is giving way to vigilante groups.

“Who can complain about forced conversion is only a person who’s been a victim of a forced conversion. But the law allows anyone…any cousin, any relative…and thus vigilante groups are actually going around looking at notice boards and collector’s offices or registrar offices to find who’s put up a notice that they want to have an inter-faith marriage and in this case they’ll also have ready information on who wants to convert and thus subject the person to public intimidation,” the ex-judge claimed.

The development comes amid the raging controversy over the Arunachal Pradesh Freedom of Religion Act (APFRA), a legislation which is meant to protect indigenous communities in the Northeastern state but is vehemently opposed by Christian evangelist groups.

When Justice S Muralidhar released Gautam Navlakha from house arrest

In August 2018, the Pune Police arrested Gautam Navlakha and 4 other urban naxals in connection with the Bhima Koregaon violence.

The cops pointed out that Navlakha and his comrades wanted to whip up sentiments under the garb of an ‘anti-caste event’ and assassinate Prime Minister Narendra Modi as part of a larger conspiracy. The urban naxals were then put under house arrest.

In November 2018, a Delhi High Court Bench comprising of Justice S Muralidhar set aside the order of a local court that granted transit remand to the Maharashtra police to shift Gautam Navlakha to Pune.

He stated that the transit remand did not comply with CrPC rules. Justice S Muralidhar ruled that the arrest of Gautam Navlakha was untenable by law and thus released him from house arrest.

The accused urban naxal Gautam Navlakha had reportedly visited the United States thrice in the period between 2010-2011 and written to a US district court judge seeking clemency for Fai, who was arrested by the FBI in 2011 on the charges of accepting funds to the tune of several million from the ISI and the Pakistan government.

In another case, on 31st December 2023, the Delhi Police interrogated Navlakha in Mumbai in connection with the NewsClick funding case. He was questioned about his association with NewsClick’s founder and Editor-in-Chief Prabir Purkayastha, as well as his shareholding in the company, PPK NewsClick Studio Pvt Ltd. 

As DOGE stops USAID funding, Canada announces $272.1 million in foreign aid for Bangladesh and Indo-Pacific

On 9th March, Canada’s Minister of International Development, Ahmed Hussen, announced a new foreign aid package worth $272.1 million to fund development projects in Bangladesh and the Indo-Pacific region. The announcement comes at a time when USAID funding has been stopped by the United States President Donald Trump.

In a statement, Hussen emphasised that Canada is committed to strengthening ties with Bangladesh and the wider Indo-Pacific. He highlighted that Canada’s focus is on healthcare, women’s empowerment, and climate change initiatives.

He stated, “Canada continues to fiercely strengthen our long-lasting friendship with Bangladesh and the wider Indo-Pacific region with our long-standing people-to-people ties. By supporting vulnerable communities’ healthcare services, empowering women, and addressing climate change, we are creating a brighter tomorrow for the global community.”

Funding spread across 14 projects

Reportedly, the funding will provide assistance to 14 different projects, with contributions from other international partners and donors. The Liberal government’s decision is being seen as a reflection of its approach to foreign aid, specifically in contrast to recent funding cuts announced by the United States.

Contrast with US approach under Trump

In the past couple of months, the United States administration, under President Donald Trump, has significantly reduced its foreign aid commitments. Trump and his newly appointed government efficiency czar, billionaire Elon Musk, placed a 90-day freeze on US foreign aid through USAID. The decision effectively shut down global aid programmes.

As a result, thousands of government contract employees were let go. Furthermore, foreign aid workers and supporters have argued that the President exceeded his authority by dismantling a congressionally approved agency.

On the other hand, Trump’s administration has defended the move, arguing that foreign aid primarily benefits liberal political agendas and is an unnecessary drain on taxpayer money. Billions of dollars were being funnelled through USAID for programmes that had no benefit for US taxpayers. For example, a $21 million fund was allocated for “voter turnout” in India, which, according to Trump, could have been used to push Prime Minister Narendra Modi out of office during general elections.

There are several such examples that show taxpayers’ money was used to fund projects, illegal immigrants, and more in the US and worldwide.

What is ActBlue? As Trump claims attack on Tesla, read why Elon Musk and the new US administration are at loggerheads with funding channels of NGOs

On 8th March, billionaire and Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) head Elon Musk sparked controversy with his post on social media platform X, suggesting that ActBlue, a fundraising platform, is under investigation for its role in protests against his company, Tesla.

Source: X

In his post, Musk wrote, “An investigation has found five ActBlue-funded groups responsible for Tesla ‘protests’: Troublemakers, Disruption Project, Rise & Resist, Indivisible Project, and Democratic Socialists of America. ActBlue funders include George Soros, Reid Hoffman, Herbert Sandler, Patricia Bauman, and Leah Hunt-Hendrix. ActBlue is currently under investigation for allowing foreign and illegal donations in criminal violation of campaign finance regulations. This week, seven ActBlue senior officials resigned, including the associate general counsel. If you know anything about this, please post in replies. Thanks, Elon.”

Though the President of the United States, Donald Trump, did not comment on it separately, he shared a screenshot of Musk’s post on his social media platform, Truth Social. The accusations made by the duo tie into broader Republican concerns over foreign influence and left-wing activism. Notably, the US administration under Trump has taken a strict stance on non-governmental organisations (NGOs) that channel millions into causes linked to the Democrats.

What is ActBlue?

ActBlue is a Democrat-leaning fundraising platform. It facilitates small-dollar donations to left-leaning candidates and causes. The platform was established in 2004 and has raised over $16 billion. Reports suggest that it plays a crucial role in financing election campaigns, NGOs, and activist groups.

Republicans also have a similar platform known as WinRed, which operates on similar lines but on a much smaller scale. According to experts, ActBlue has a very opaque funding flow. Furthermore, there are accusations of foreign funding being funnelled through unverified contributors.

One of the biggest issues with such platforms is that they allow anonymous funding. In many countries, foreign funding has to be declared by NGOs—for example, in India. However, funding platforms are often misused to funnel foreign contributions without informing the government.

According to the US State Department, there are no limits or restrictions on the receipt of foreign funding by NGOs operating in the US. However, laws are in place to restrict contributions from terrorist organisations. Furthermore, there is a restriction on direct financial support of political candidates by foreign individuals.

Now, as Musk has accused ActBlue of indirectly funding anti-Tesla and anti-X protests, there is a possibility that the Trump administration is moving ahead with a crackdown on the platform, similar to its approach towards USAID-funded NGOs and groups receiving taxpayers’ money from international projects.

Musk’s allegations – Who is targeting Tesla?

Musk has ignited controversy with allegations that several left-leaning organisations, including The Disruption Project, Indivisible, and the Democratic Socialists of America, are behind the protests against his automobile company, Tesla. There has been consistent targeting of Tesla, including protests, sabotage, and online smear campaigns, since Musk took a position in the Trump administration.

Interestingly, the Left has been against Musk since he took over Twitter (now X). Notably, Democrats have not only demanded that he be stopped from acting as head of DOGE but have also called for his deportation.

Musk, in his post, suggested that the left-leaning NGOs are backed by ActBlue and billionaires like George Soros and Reid Hoffman for coordinated attacks on his companies.

In recent times, several attacks on Tesla have taken place, including vandalism at Tesla showrooms and charging stations in the US and France. In one incident, a woman was arrested in Colorado for allegedly trying to set a Tesla dealership on fire. In another, gunshots were fired at a Tesla sales centre in Oregon. In coordinated attacks on X, advertisers have been pressured by the Left to withdraw from the platform over political content policies. However, 2025 saw return of majority of X advertisers. However, even the return has come under fire as some Democrat senators have urged DOJ to investigate if Musk is using his access to White House to force advertisers to return to X.

While some of these incidents are deemed unrelated, Musk has insisted that NGO-backed networks are orchestrating a larger movement. Notably, his allegations have gained traction after seven senior ActBlue officials abruptly resigned from the organisation, suggesting the platform is indeed under some form of investigation by the Trump administration.

The Trump administration’s crackdown on NGOs

Since President Trump returned to the Oval Office for his second term, he has launched multiple investigations into left-leaning NGOs and foreign funding sources. ActBlue seems to be one of the platforms at the centre of scrutiny, especially after Musk’s post on social media.

Trump’s administration recently threatened to cut funds for institutes allowing illegal protests. Notably, in the past year, there were several instances where NGOs backed by Soros were found to be involved in anti-Israel protests after Israel launched counter strikes on Hamas.

A key part of Trump’s strategy to “clean up the system” from such elements is DOGE, which Musk co-chairs. The aim of DOGE is to cut wasteful spending and investigate questionable federal grants, including funding for organisations backed by USAID—a government fund that Musk has shut down. Some private funders, including the Soros’s Open Society Foundations, have also long been on Musk’s radar, as they have been accused of indirectly supporting so-called activist movements, particularly in US universities.

Notably, the Trump administration’s crackdown on these organisations is not limited to funding. There are reports that legislation is being considered to limit NGOs’ involvement in political lobbying and prevent them from using taxpayers’ money for questionable activities, such as supporting illegals. Those who support the move say it is long-overdue accountability, while opponents see it as a Republican war on ‘civil society’.

NGO funding wars – How this fight extends beyond ActBlue

ActBlue is just one part of a wider conflict in the US political landscape. Republicans argue that left-wing NGOs, university networks, and international non-profits function as a shadow funding ecosystem that helps Democrats control the public narrative. For example, there is a “dark money” group called the “Sixteen Thirty Fund” that finances American Left and it has been on Republican’s radar for a long time. In 2021, Politico reported that the group finances attack ads against Trump and vulnerable Republican senators during elections. The group funnelled $410 million in 2020 to aid Democratic efforts to remove then-President Donald Trump.

Reportedly, Trump’s team is considering restricting NGOs from receiving foreign funding and limiting international collaborations involving USAID-backed entities. The administration is also investigating whether NGOs bypassed campaign finance laws by funneling money through ActBlue’s donation network.

Responses and political implications

ActBlue has denied any involvement in Tesla-related activism. Insiders have dismissed the allegations as “paranoid conspiracy theories.” Reid Hoffman, whom Musk accused of funding the anti-Tesla protests, denied any connection and stated that Musk’s erratic behaviour is driving public backlash. In a post on X, he said, “Just one more of Elon’s false claims about me: I never funded anyone for Tesla protests. I don’t condone violence. But it’s clear Americans are angry at him – it’s easier to explain away their anger, than to accept that actions have consequences.”

Source: X

A political-business collision

Musk is playing a key role in Trump’s administration. The fight over ActBlue and NGO funding is not just about Tesla; it represents a larger battle over political power, funding networks, and control over public discourse. The investigations into ActBlue’s finances are still ongoing, according to Musk. However, the controversy signals that NGOs, billionaires, and tech giants will continue to lock horns in the coming days.

Pakistan: Baloch rebels hijack Jaffar Express train carrying over 400 passengers; women and children released as rebels warn of executing remaining hostages on military intervention

On Tuesday (11th March), the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) which seeks independence of Balochistan from Pakistan hijacked a passenger train named Jaffar Express carrying around 400 passengers. The train with nine coaches was heading from Quetta in Balochistan to Peshawar in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa when it was fired on by the Baloch fighters. These rebels had blown the railway tracks forcing the train to stop and boarded it.

In a statement, the Baloch Liberation Army said that if the Pakistani authorities launched an operation against them, they would kill all the hostages. While several media reports claim that 400 people have been taken hostage by BLA fighters, the rebel group in its statement said that they have taken over 100 passengers hostage.

“Any military incursion will be met with an equally forceful response. So far, six military personnel have been killed, and hundreds of passengers remain under BLA custody. The Baloch Liberation Army takes full responsibility for this operation,” the BLA spokesperson Jeeyand Baloch said adding that women, children and Baloch passengers were released.

Jeeyand Baloch said that this has been done to ensure that only serving personnel of the “occupying forces” remain with them. The BLA spokesperson further stated that the operation is being carried out by the BLA Majeed Brigade Fateh Squad and STOS.

According to a statement from the BLA, women, children, and Baloch passengers have been freed, while military personnel remain captive. The BLA has held 182 passengers as hostages, the group’s statement released on Telegram said. It also warned of executions of hostages if Pakistani army intervened.

Meanwhile, the Balochistan government’s spokesperson Shahid Rind said that emergency measures have been imposed and all institutions have been mobilised to deal with the situation.

Love Jihad in Haryana: 16-year-old Hindu girl tricked into marriage by Sheikh posing as Ram; contracts HIV after being pushed into prostitution

A shocking case has come to light in Karnal, Haryana where a Muslim youth married a 16-year-old girl from Bihar nine months ago by masquerading as a Hindu. He introduced himself as Ram, but later his real name turned out to be Sheikh. He forced the minor girl into prostitution shortly after the marriage and employed her at a spa. The development surfaced when she was injured in an accident and was discovered to be HIV positive in her medical examination. Now, the police and child welfare committee are extensively investigating the matter.

According to media reports, the victim disclosed that she was from Bihar and believed her husband to be a Hindu at the time of the marriage. However, the truth about his real identity came out soon. He pressured her to work in the spa centre. She informed him after learning about her illness, but he still left her to work there. The girl stated that 1-2 people used to have sex with her every day. On 8th March, during Women’s Day, the police raided a spa centre in Karnal and located her there.

The girl was taken to the child welfare committee following the search. During counselling, she narrated her horrific ordeal. The teenager has been placed in a child protective facility and continues to be in shock, according to committee chairman Umesh Chanana. Now, the committee is looking for her family members. The City Police Station has registered a case against her spouse, the spa centre operator and others. A hunt is underway to nab the accused.

The spa centre’s information is being used to identify those who have had sexual encounters with the girl so that they can be probed and treated. This could be an instance of conversion, according to the child welfare committee. The issue has also been connected to love jihad, based on the sources.

Pakistan envoy to Turkmenistan stopped from entering the US despite a valid visa

In an embarrassing turn of events for Pakistan, its envoy to Turkmenistan KK Ahsan Wagan was denied entry into the United States despite having a valid visa and all travel documents. The US airport authorities deported the Pakistani envoy who was heading to Los Angeles on a vacation.

As per Pakistani media reports, KK Ahsan Wagan was stopped at the airport due to “controversial visa references”. However, the US authorities did not specify the exact reason behind this rare decision. The Pakistan foreign ministry confirmed this incident and claimed: “Ambassador K K Wagan was deported from the US. He had an immigration objection which led to his deportation.”

The Pakistani diplomat was then forced to return to his last port of departure.

Meanwhile, Pakistani Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar and Secretary Amina Baloch were informed of the incident. The Pakistani Foreign Affairs Ministry has directed its consulate in Los Angeles to investigate the issue.

Incidentally, the Pakistani diplomat was denied entry into the US just days after President Donald Trump threatened to impose a travel ban on people from Pakistan and Afghanistan. Reports say that this travel ban would be imposed based on a government review of countries’ security and vetting risks.

‘They feared me’, ‘killed landlord’, ‘why would I go to jail?’: Left-wing MLA from Bihar boasts of his terror; video goes viral—a testament of Lalu-Rabri’s jungle raj?

A leftist legislator from Bihar has openly shared his story of terror on camera. He confessed to killing a landlord and spoke about the fear surrounding the incident. The MLA detailed these events in an interview, and now, some clips from it have surfaced.

CPI (ML) leader Satyadev Ram recounted his journey, describing how he rose from poverty to wealth. He claimed that a landlord from his village began troubling him, which eventually led to the murder.

Satyadev Ram stated, “I made up my mind to end the landlord’s dominance. I joined this party (CPI-ML) because I saw them fighting. We fought in the village for a year. That landlord was eliminated and finished. After that, I developed political awareness.”

At this point, the journalist interrupted and asked if he had indeed killed the landlord. He responded, “What else? What do you think?” The journalist then questioned whether he had ever been jailed for the crime. The MLA replied, “Why would I go to jail? Why would I stay in jail?”

“This part of the conversation can be heard in the video between the 11th and 15th minute.”

Satyadev Ram then stated, “They didn’t even file a case against me. They were too scared to do so. The police surrounded the village until 9 PM, but I managed to escape in my way. After that, they became even more fearful. This was when my political awareness started growing.” He further mentioned that people used to shut their doors out of fear of him.

He went on to say that he later started fighting against landlords in other villages. He explained that he continued carrying out attacks in several areas. Satyadev Ram emphasized that his goal was to fight against landlords. He also admitted that after committing the murder, he kept moving from place to place.

61-year-old Satyadev Ram is a five-time legislator. He was first elected as an MLA from Mairwa in 1995 and has won from this constituency three times. In 2015 and 2020, he was elected as an MLA from the Darauli Assembly seat in Siwan district on a CPI (ML) ticket. Despite this, he openly admitted on camera that he had killed a person and faced no consequences.

What Satyadev Ram is saying may sound shocking, but it reflects the reality of Bihar in the 1990s. This was the era of Lalu Yadav and Rabri Devi’s jungle raj. It was a time when red flags were forcibly planted on farmland and those who resisted often lost their lives and property.

This period gave rise to many left-wing killers in Bihar. Today, they hold positions of honour. They proudly recount on camera how they murdered a landlord. They even admit that after the killing, they instilled fear in people and never faced the law. Ironically, these very individuals are now the ones making laws.

Massacre in Syria, persecution of Hindus in Bangladesh: How regime change always takes struggling nations from bad to worse

Syria witnessed one of the deadliest outbreaks of violence since its civil war broke out 14 years ago, with over 1,300 people killed in battles between security forces and anti-government organizations as well as a wave of “revenge killings.” The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, headquartered in Britain, reported that 250 Alawite militants from pro-Bashar al-Assad outfits, 231 members of the government security force and 830 civilians were among those who lost their lives.

The already volatile nation has seen even more unrest since President Bashar al-Assad was forced to leave the country last December as his regime fell after 24 years in power. Rebel forces led by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) took over many important cities last year, including the capital, Damascus. Notably, the United States and other Western countries consider HTS, the most powerful group within the rebel coalition, to be a terrorist group. It was associated with Al-Qaeda and ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq and Syria) supremo Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi had despatched its head and interim Syrian president Abu Mohammed al-Julani also known as Ahmed Hussein al-Sharaa to the country.

Syria dared to hope for a better future under the new leadership, but now its dim prospects have been overshadowed by the ongoing crisis. The widespread clashes began on 6th March while the administration blamed “individual actions” and claimed they were retaliating against attacks by Assad’s remaining forces.

Deadly sectarian violence rocks Syria

The Assad dynasty controlled Syria, a country with a large Sunni population, for more than 50 years. Hafez al-Assad established the rule in 1970, but it was abruptly removed last December when his son Bashar al-Assad was made to abscond. Assad family is a member of the Shia Islamic sect classified as the Alawite community who make up roughly 10 to 15% of Syria’s population. They are mostly found around the coasts of Tartus and Latakia.

The minority Alawites, who still support him, held top positions during his rule. While interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa promised to support all Syrian minorities, including Christians and Druze, Alawites and others fear persecution under the hardline Sunni rule. Furthermore, ISIS and HTS along with other Sunni extremist factions have labelled Alawites as heretics and justified murder against them. Inflaming the sectarian rift, Islamist forces inside Syria’s new government see them as the remains of a dictatorship they fought to overthrow.

Deadly confrontations between Syrian government forces and pro-Assad organizations have been reported in the coastal province of Latakia, based on Syria’s state-run SANA news agency. Pro-Assad militias launched an attack on government troops in the Alawite-dominated seaside region of Jableh. Thirteen personnel were killed during the assault on security patrols and checkpoints.

Numerous civilians were killed in the ensuing government crackdown. Armed Sunni fighters, who reportedly targeted and murdered Alawite citizens in retaliation for crimes committed under the Assad administration, joined the government forces. On the morning of 9th March, there were reports of extensive arrests, home raids, and executions of Alawite Syrians on the streets. According to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, HTS fighters and affiliated Sunni Muslim gunmen, including foreign fighters, killed about 800 members of the Alawite sect on the 6th and 7th of March. This occurred in the governorates of Tartous and Latakia in Syria’s Alawi heartland.

The observatory’s chief, Rami Abdulrahman, described the mass murders in Jableh, Baniyas and the surrounding areas in Syria’s Alawite heartland amounted to the deadliest carnage in years in the country’s 13-year-old civil war. He added that Alawite minority women and children were among the victims. Western and Arab capitals have stated that a major issue is the Islamist government’s ability to govern inclusively and the startling magnitude of the violence, which included accounts of the execution-style killing of dozens of Alawite males in one village, raises further doubts about this capacity.

“Residents of Alawite villages and towns spoke about killings during which gunmen shot Alawites, the majority of them men, in the streets or at the gates of their homes. Many homes of Alawites were looted and then set on fire in different areas,” unveiled media reports. Details of the horrific massacre disclosed that a teenager was compelled to use a gun to kill his own family members while Alawite women were paraded in the streets nude before being shot.

The scope and character of the executions are evocative of the mass killings committed by the Islamic State throughout its campaign in Syria and Iraq. The witnesses revealed that both Syrian armed groups and foreign fighters, once again displayed their religious extremism as they carried out the HTS-led executions. The violent upheaval was exacerbated by the looting of residences, businesses and places of employment.

Attack on dwindling Christian minorities

On the other hand, under the present Syrian administration, Christians and other minorities have also been subjected to atrocities. A joint statement denouncing “massacres targeting innocent civilians” was recently released by the heads of Syria’s three major Christian churches. “In recent days, Syria has witnessed a dangerous escalation of violence, brutality, and killings, resulting in attacks on innocent civilians, including women and children,” the statement signed by the patriarchs of the Greek Orthodox, Syriac Orthodox and Melkite Greek Catholic Churches stated.

It further conveyed, “The Christian churches, while strongly condemning any act that threatens civil peace, denounce and condemn the massacres targeting innocent civilians, and call for an immediate end to these horrific acts, which stand in stark opposition to all human and moral values.” The statement added, “The churches also call for the swift creation of conditions conducive to achieving national reconciliation among the Syrian people.”

There is a small Christian community in the city of Latakia, which has been severely affected by the persistent violence, even though the majority of Christians in Syria escaped during the civil conflict that broke out in 2011. The Syrian Observer estimated that just about 300,000 Christians are in Syria, a sharp decline from the country’s Christian population at the beginning of the civil war. Thousands of people, including Christians and Alawites, reportedly ran from the areas in search of safety in neighbouring mountains. According to local accounts, there have been targeted murders of Christians in Latakia.

The United States also released an official statement denouncing the violence perpetrated against minority groups in Syria and announced, “The United States condemns the radical Islamist terrorists, including foreign jihadis, that murdered people in western Syria in recent days. The United States stands with Syria’s religious and ethnic minorities, including its Christian, Druze, Alawite, and Kurdish communities, and offers its condolences to the victims and their families. Syria’s interim authorities must hold the perpetrators of these massacres against Syria’s minority communities accountable.” The violence has been addressed by multiple world leaders as well.

Ahmed al-Sharaa vows action but no action on the ground

Meanwhile, de facto leader Ahmed al-Sharaa conveyed that security forces should not permit anyone to “exaggerate in their response because what differentiates us from our enemy is our commitment to our values.” He alleged, “When we give up on our morals, us and our enemy end up on the same side.” His appeal, nevertheless, appears to have no impact. The violence was earlier referred to by Sharaa as “expected challenges.” He further claimed, “Syria is a state of law. The law will take its course on all.”

The interim government in Syria promised to set up an impartial commission to “investigate and ascertain the facts” and provide the president with a report in 30 days. According to a statement released by the Syrian interim presidency, the committee would “investigate the violations committed against civilians and identify those responsible,” as well as “uncover the reasons, circumstances, and conditions that led to these events.”

Additionally, it will “investigate and determine accountability for attacks on public institutions, security forces, and the military.” It further stated that those found guilty would be presented before the judiciary.

Blood of Hindus cover the streets in Bangladesh

The alarming events in Syria are similar to the events that transpired in Bangladesh following the forced exodus of former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina in August of last year. The anti-quota demonstrations progressed into a coup that deposed the Bangladesh Awami League and ultimately descended into violence against the nation’s minorities, particularly Hindus. Muhammad Yunus’s interim government, in the meantime, has been catering to radicals, purposefully keeping quiet about their activities, freeing convicted terrorists and Islamic hardliners and attempting to discredit assaults on Hindu community by terming them “fake,” “exaggerated,” “politically motivated,” and even accusing India of spreading propaganda over the same.

However, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) released a 104-page report outlining crimes committed against vulnerable Hindus in the nation, in addition to reports from Bangladesh and the international media. “Violent mobs engaged in serious acts of revenge violence, including killings, targeting police and Awami League officials, especially from early August onwards. Some Hindus were also subjected to human rights abuses, including the burning of homes and attacks on places of worship, with different underlying motivations,” it pointed out.

The report identified several attacks on Hindu houses, places of worship and businesses in Thakurgaon, Lalmonirhat, Dinajpur, Sylhet, Khulna and Rangpur. The human rights organization also brought attention to the forced resignations of Hindu teachers and headmasters. The Human Rights group pointed out that the administration did not effectively respond to stop non-state actors from abusing human rights (a reference to violent Muslim mobs). The assault on Hindus and indigenous people in the Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT) was also mentioned in the report.

It has now become a norm to murder Hindus, smash idols of their deities, illegally occupy their properties, slaughter cows to offend them and forcibly convert them to Islam, in Bangladesh with the tacit support of the current regime. The Islamists even asked for jizyah, or taxes paid by non-Muslim people to their Muslim rulers, from Hindus and threatened them over “Durga Puja” celebrations. Likewise, the indigenous Buddhist monks in Chittagong Hill Tracts last year expressed that they would not be performing “Kathin Chibar Dan” (Kathina Robe Offering) because of the circumstances and security concerns.

A similar operation unfolded in Ukraine

Unsurprisingly, the United States, which was responsible for the regime change in Bangladesh, also pushed Ukraine toward an unending war with Russia owing to a similar operation in the country. According to President Donald Trump, 700,000 Ukrainian troops and one million Russian forces have been dead. However, the figure is much higher than any estimates provided by Western intelligence services, Russia or Ukraine. The number of injured and displaced individuals is significantly higher. The property loss is in the billions.

“War in Ukraine risks seeing 90 per cent of the country “freefall into poverty” and extreme vulnerability,” a United Nations report assessed in 2022. Nine million Ukrainians live in poverty as of 2024, a rise of 1.8 million since the beginning of 2022 because of the war, which has resulted in extensive damage and fatalities. Victoria “Toria” Nuland, a former member of the US Foreign Service, who was also active in Bangladesh was responsible for pushing the nation into war with Russia and for toppling a democratically elected government of Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych in favour of the United States, under the pretext of “freedom.”

Nuland, along with her liberal-interventionist and neocon allies, saw a chance to oppose Russian President Vladimir Putin in Ukraine by encouraging violent protests to overthrow the pro-Russian President Yanukovych and install a new government hostile to Moscow. She got an opportunity on 20th February 2014, when a mysterious sniper who seemed to be operating from a building controlled by the Right Sector shot and killed police officers and protesters, escalating the crisis.

On 21st February, Yanukovych made a last-ditch effort to avoid further unrest by agreeing to a plan guaranteed by the European Union which recognized diminished powers and called for early elections to remove him from office. Nevertheless, that proved insufficient since on 22nd February, anti-Yanukovych groups led by the Right Sector and neo-Nazi militias took over government buildings, forcing him and a number of his employees to flee for their lives. Armed thugs prowling the corridors of power made the final path to “regime change” clear.

The turmoil brought on by the “regime change” caused Ukraine to descend into financial ruin and ultimately engage in a brutal conflict with Russia, a former superpower and a far greater economy.

Conclusion

Regime change operations have never worked out well for the nation, its citizens, or even the rest of the globe. They not only claim numerous lives but also devastate the already fragile economies. Similar events have occurred throughout history, such as the Arab Spring, where regimes were held accountable and leadership changed but left power vacuums throughout the Arab world and in the end, it led to a bitter conflict between religious elites seeking to consolidate their influence and people.

Minority groups are, of course, the first to suffer from such acts. They are the designated targets who, particularly in Muslim countries, must bear the brunt for no fault of their own. Similar incidents occurred in Afghanistan, where the Taliban targeted and destroyed religious minorities along with their holy symbols such as the popular Buddhas of Bamiyan. When such forces seize power, they also jeopardize the nation’s cultural heritage and roots.

Likewise, on the occasion of the Bengali New Year (Pohela Boishakh), which is observed on 14th April of each year, radicals are threatening to slaughter 100 cows in Bangladesh, hurting long-standing customs and traditions to humiliate Hindus. However, in reality, the people in positions of power, those who impose them and the fanatics have benefited from regime changes as the rest, particularly marginalized groups, suffer while a constant doom looms over the unsustainable state of affairs, including the economies of such nations, the absence of safety and security prove disastrous for everyone in the long run.

Government to introduce Immigration and Foreigners Bill 2025 to regulate stay of foreigners in India: Key highlights

In a major attempt to overhaul India’s immigration system, the Modi government is likely to introduce the Immigration and Foreigners Bill in the Lok Sabha on 11th March 2025. This proposed legislation aims to bolster India’s immigration framework by replacing the outdated laws which are no longer sufficient to address contemporary immigration and related security challenges. The Immigration and Foreigners Bill 2025 seeks to create a comprehensive legal structure to regulate the entry, stay and exit of foreigners in India.

The Immigration and Foreigners Bill 2025 repeals and replaces the Foreigners Act, 1946; Passport (Entry into India) Act, 1920; Registration of Foreigners Act, 1939; and Immigration (Carriers’ Liability) Act, 2000. These old laws are being repealed to prevent overlapping with the new legislation.

Besides streamlining immigration procedures, the proposed legislation aims to impose heavy penalties on illegal immigrants. Most importantly, the bill shifts the burden of proving legal status on the immigrant rather than the state. As the Immigration and Foreigners Bill 2025 is set to transform India’s immigration system, here are the key highlights of the proposed legislation.

Grounds for refusal to entry in India, increased powers for Immigration Officers

The bill states that no individual shall be allowed to enter India via air, water or land without a valid passport and other travel documents. Similarly, foreigners would be required to have valid visa and while staying in India, they (foreigners) are exempted under section 33 or intergovernmental agreements.

“No person proceeding from any place outside India shall enter age to enter, India by air, water or land unless he is in possession of a valid passport or other travel document, and in case of a foreigner, also a valid visa, and any foreigner while present in India shall also be required to possess valid passport or other valid travel document and valid visa, unless exempted under section 33 or through inter-governmental agreements,” the bill reads.

The Immigration and Foreigners Bill 2025 further provides that no foreigner would be allowed to enter and stay in India if he is found to be a threat to India’s national security and integrity or jeopardises India’s relations with foreign states, public health, etc. In these cases, the decision of the Immigration Officer will be final and binding.

“Provided that notwithstanding anything contained in this sub-section, no foreigner shall be allowed to enter into or stay in India, if he is found inadmissible to do so on account of the threat to national security, sovereignty and integrity of India, relations with a foreign State or public health or on such other grounds as the Central Government may, specify in this behalf Provided further that the decision of the Immigration Officer in this regard shall be final and binding,” the bill reads.

The bill also states that no one would be allowed to depart from India without having a valid passport and other travel documents and in case of foreigners, the possession of a valid visa would be required.

“Notwithstanding anything contained in section 3 of the Passports Act, 1967, no person shall depart or attempt to depart from India by air, water or land unless he is in possession of a valid passport or other travel document and in case of a foreigner, also a valid visa,” the bill states.

It further mentions that no person would be allowed to leave India if his presence is required by the country’s authorised agencies or on grounds the Central government specifies. In this regard as well, the decision of the Immigration Officer would be final and binding.

“Provided that notwithstanding anything contained in this sub-section, no person shall be allowed to depart or exit from India, if his presence is required in India by any authorised agency or on such grounds as the Central Government may by order, specify in this behalf,” the bill reads.

While there already is a Bureau of Immigration, the new bill provides increased powers and legal backing to the Immigration Officers who may examine the passport or other travel documents and visa of a foreigner during his entry into transit through, stay in movement within India and also require him to furnish such information as may be necessary and appropriate. Moreover, the Immigration Officer may also check a passport or other travel document of any person which has been declared as lost or stolen or considered as damaged or forged or fraudulently obtained or on the direction of the passport issuing authority.

Furthermore, the bill mentions that all the visa and related matters will be dealt with by the Central Government.

Immigration and Foreigners Bill 2025 places the burden of proving legal status on individuals and imposes carrier liability

The bill provides that institutions including universities, hospitals, nursing homes etc hosting foreign nationals like students or patients will be required to report their details to designated registration officers. This would improve the tracking of foreign nationals in India while enhancing accountability.

Moreover, the bill places the onus on individuals to prove their legal status in India, reversing the traditional challenging approach wherein the State had established illegality. This would essentially streamline deportation processes for illegal immigrants like Rohingya and Bangladeshi Muslims.

To prevent the influx of illegal immigrants into India and reinforce border control measures, the bill reportedly says that airlines and other transport carriers will face penalties for bringing illegal immigrants into India.

Stricter penalties for violation of immigration laws

The Immigration and Foreigners Bill 2025 proposes much-needed stricter penalties for violation of laws. The bill states that foreign nationals entering India without valid passports or visas could face up to five years of incarceration and fines up to Rs 5 lakh. For those using forged travel documents, the penalties escalate to a minimum of two years and up to seven years in prison alongside fines ranging from Rs 1 lakh to Rs 10 lakh. These measures would deter illegal immigration and the use of fraudulent means to obtain documents for illegal stay in India as seen in the case of Bangladeshi illegals.

In addition, the bill reportedly includes a provision of three years imprisonment and a Rs 3 lakh fine for overstaying the visa period.

How the Immigration and Foreigners Bill 2025 can help India tackle immigration-related challenges

The bill, if passed, would establish India’s strictest-ever immigration system, reinforcing the Central government’s control over the entry, stay and departure of foreign nationals. Most importantly, the bill would aid the Centre’s efforts to tackle the menace of illegal infiltration of Rohingyas and Bangladeshis from the porous borders it shares with Myanmar, Bangladesh and Nepal as well as expedite their deportation.

India faces multifaceted challenges rooted in its geographical position, porous borders, and socio-political dynamics.

As per the latest data as of 31 December by UNHCR, around 95,600 Rohingyas are living in India who fled after facing persecution in Myanmar. This includes 22,500 refugees and asylum seekers considered stateless by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. The majority of Rohingya Muslims, over 10 lakh, who fled Myanmar reside in Bangladesh, and they are supported by international aid agencies. These stateless refugees pose a security threat to India contrary to the Islamo-leftist cabal’s constant efforts at whitewashing the involvement of the members of this community in criminal activities. Rohingya refugee camps have been strongly suspected to be breeding grounds for radicalization and terror activities. Rohingyas have been arrested in the past for involvement in human trafficking. They have been arrested for involvement in dacoities.

Similarly, the influx of illegal Bangladeshi immigrants into the bordering states of India has been a threat to the country’s national security and demography. One of the biggest obstacles in identifying and deporting Bangladeshi illegal immigrants is proving their nationality. This is because the illegal immigrants who have been staying in India for many years and decades have obtained bogus Aadhar Cards and other documents. These illegal immigrants have integrated into local communities and even received support from Muslim-appeasing political parties. The enhanced penalties and stricter rules in the new Bill, may deter such illegal crossings and punish those caught with forged documents, disrupting the ecosystem of those facilitating the stay of illegal immigrants by providing forged documents in exchange for money or carrying out other illegal activities like smuggling or narcotics and human trafficking.

The harsh penalties for illegal entry and document fraud proposed in the Immigration and Foreigners Bill 2025 aim to dissuade those planning to enter India illegally and procure fake identities as the risk of imprisonment and penalties would outweigh the supposed benefits of illegal immigration. A strict implementation of this bill, if passed, may reduce the illegal infiltration of Bangladeshi Muslims and Rohingyas.

As the bill includes provisions shifting the burden of proving legal status on immigrants and empowering immigration officers, the deportation process would become more streamlined. If the Indian government ramps up enforcement, the challenges including judicial delays and lack of cooperation from origin countries like Myanmar which does not recognise Rohingyas as its citizens, India would be in a better position to pressure origin countries into entering repatriation agreements.

Haryana: CM Saini orders probe after woman who had got jail time for filing false rape cases gets honoured on Women’s day

0

On International Women’s Day, on 8th of march, Rekha Rani Dhiman, an activist from Haryana, received the Indira Gandhi Mahila Shakti Award along with a cash prize of ₹1.50 lakh. However, since then, her controversial past has come to light and Haryana CM Nayab Singh Saini has ordered a probe into the matter. CM Saini has ordered a probe to find out how her name was even recommended for the award.

The Haryana CM has ordered a probe into Jind Administration’s failure to verify Rekha Dhiman’s background before recommending her for the award.

Rekha had apparently filed over 2 dozen false cases of rape. The social media uproar over her award apparently led to the probe being ordered by the CM.

Media coordinator of Haryana CM Saini, Ashok Chhabra, said, “The CM has ordered an inquiry into the matter and strict action would be taken against officials responsible for the oversight.”

Incidentally, police records show that Rekha had been jailed in 2020 for filing a false rape complaint and is currently out on bail. She is known for filing false rape cases frequently, and even spent 33 days in Jind Jail because of her frequent false claims.

Rekha Dhiman had filed rape case against 12 men in Jind district of Haryana, against 26 men in Hisar, and another case against men in Rohtak.

While explaining the reason why her name was forwarded for the reward on Women’s Day, Jind deputy commissioner Mohammad Imran Raza said, “Rekha Rani Dhiman had disclosed her past cases in an affidavit while applying for the award. Since the court has not yet convicted her and the matter is still pending, her name was forwarded to the Haryana women and child development department for consideration.”

Haryana CM Nayab Singh Saini had honoured 50 women on the International Women’s Day, and Rekha Dhiman was one of them.