Home Blog Page 508

Maharashtra: Muslim woman and her child held captive, chained by her family for 2 months because they disliked her marriage with a Hindu man

The Bhokardan police in the Jalna district of Maharashtra freed a woman and her three-year-old child who had been chained and imprisoned by her parents for the previous two months. The development transpired on 3rd February on the directions of the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court last year, following a complaint by the victim’s husband.

According to an official, Shahnaz also known as Sonal, was saved from a residence in Bhokardan tehsil’s remote Alapur hamlet where her parents kept their daughter and grandson locked and shackled in a room for two months. The woman, who is in her twenties, had married a 25-year-old Dalit man and had a son with him who is three years old. However, her family disapproved of the relationship.

“The couple had an inter-faith marriage registered in the court of law. In 2020 they got married and also had a child. The woman’s mother used to visit them in Aurangabad and last year she convinced them to visit their Alapur village and meet all the family members, claiming they had forgiven her. When they came down to her village, the husband was beaten up by the parents and thrown out of the house. The woman and her son were chained and locked inside a room since then,” Sub-Inspector B.T. Sahane, who was involved in the rescue operation informed.

The husband made many efforts to reach her and bring her back, but he was repeatedly denied access to the house. Eventually, he approached the high court after submitting a complaint at the police station. The official further conveyed, “After the court order, the police team raided the house twice last month (January) but could not find them. We managed to convince her brother, who helped us with details of where and how she was held captive with her son. On 29th January the police team raided the house wearing civilian clothes and found their ankles chained inside a room. The parents got into fight with us without realising we were police.”

On the same day the woman and her kid appeared in court and were turned over to the husband by a government attorney. “We are expecting to lodge an FIR (First Information Report) only if the victim wants to do so. She will visit the police station on 5th February.” BT Sahane added.

As Donald Trump moves to halt funding to UN agency UNRWA, read about the UN body with links to terror organisation Hamas

On 3rd February, a White House official informed that the United States President Donald Trump is expected to terminate the country’s involvement in the United Nations Human Rights Council and to continue to suspend funding for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA). The development, which could transpire as soon as today, coincided with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu visit to Washington.

Notably, Netanyahu has long criticized UNRWA, accusing the organization of inciting anti-Israel sentiment and its employees of being part of “terrorist activities against the nation.” Trump also halted funding for the outfit during his first term in office, which ran from 2017 to 2021. He raised concerns about its value along with stressing that Palestinians must consent to a renewal of peace negotiations with the Jewish state and also proposed reforms for the same.

Halfway through its tenure, the first Trump administration also resigned from the 47-member Human Rights Council, citing what it termed as a lack of reform and persistent prejudice against Israel. The Geneva-based body does not currently have the United States as a member. The country was re-elected and served a 2022–2024 term under Democrat leader and former President Joe Biden.

Hamas held hostages at UNRWA facilities

UNWRA has frequently been associated with Hamas, particularly since the 7th October 2023 terrorist attack, which was led by Hamas and left over 1,200 people dead in Israel and 251 others were taken hostage. Their close association recently gained attention after a 28-year-old British-Israeli woman, who had been kept captive by Hamas in Gaza for 15 months, revealed that she was being held at UN facilities, reigniting debate about UNRWA’s involvement with Hamas. Emily Damari, who was freed earlier this month unveiled that she was previously detained by Hamas at UNRWA sites.

She had a phone conversation with the United Kingdom (UK) Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer earlier this month and added that despite having gunshot wounds on her hand and leg, she was not given access to medical care. It caused her to lose two fingers.

Her mother stated, “It’s a miracle that she survived, and we need to get aid to remaining hostages now,” as they requested the UK Prime Minister to exert pressure on UNRWA and Hamas to grant the Red Cross access to the remaining 82 hostages in the region.

Philippe Lazzarin, Commissioner-General of UNRWA, however, countered the allegations and remarked, “Claims that hostages have been held in UNRWA premises are deeply disturbing & shocking. We take any such allegations extremely seriously. We have repeatedly called for independent investigations into any credible claims of misuse & disregard of UN premises by Palestinian armed militants, including Hamas. UNRWA was forced to vacate all its installations in the north of Gaza Strip, including Gaza City, on 13 October 2023 & has, since then, had no control over them.”

Notably, UNRWA has been accused of similar charges earlier despite their repeated denials. The agency has long been accused by the Israeli government of allowing Hamas to infiltrate its organization and exploit its facilities for military objectives. Israel prohibited the body from operating on its territory after the 7th October terror attack. Israel’s ban on UNRWA’s activities in the country came into force on 30th January, 2024. The ban also prohibited Israeli officials from dealing with UNRWA staff in territories controlled by the country.

Concerns had been further raised by evidence that the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) discovered. They reported to have found arms hidden in UNRWA facilities, and tunnels built by Hamas beneath its schools. Israel charged that UNRWA staff members participated directly in the 7th October terror attack. More importantly, nine of the 19 UNRWA personnel that were questioned “may have been involved” in the mayhem, according to an independent United Nations probe.

Moreover, experts especially in Israel and the US, contended that rather than assimilating Palestinian refugees into host nations, UNRWA’s existence perpetuates their status as refugees. UNRWA has even been accused of encouraging antisemitic material in its curricula.

Israeli authorities argued that UNRWA’s departure won’t have a major effect on relief efforts because it only has a small role in distributing humanitarian aid. As part of the ceasefire deal, 4,200 humanitarian aid trucks continue to enter Gaza each week. Trump reconfirmed the decision to stop US assistance to UNRWA as the country’s envoy Dorothy Shea blasted the organisation for “exaggerating the effects” of the Israeli response during her speech to the UN Security Council, calling such statements as “irresponsible and dangerous.”

UNRWA’s alleged role in the 7th October massacre

In January 2024, the charges surfaced after Israel notified UNRWA that 12 employees were involved in the attack on Israel. The UN body terminated the employment of the accused staffers after the allegations came to light.

“The Israeli authorities have provided UNRWA with information about the alleged involvement of several UNRWA employees in the horrific attacks on Israel on 7th October. To protect the agency’s ability to deliver humanitarian assistance, I have decided to immediately terminate the contracts of these staff members and launch an investigation to establish the truth without delay. Any UNRWA employee who was involved in acts of terror will be held accountable, including through criminal prosecution,” Philippe Lazzarini conveyed in a statement.

Lazzarini added, “UNRWA reiterates its condemnation in the strongest possible terms of the abhorrent attacks of 7th October and calls for the immediate and unconditional release of all Israeli hostages and their safe return to their families. These shocking allegations come as more than 2 million people in Gaza depend on lifesaving assistance that the agency has been providing since the war began. Anyone who betrays the fundamental values of the United Nations also betrays those whom we serve in Gaza, across the region and elsewhere around the world.”

Israel then informed the UN of seven further cases, two in April and five in March, of UNRWA’s involvement. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres also asked the Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS) to look into the allegations. Additionally, he designated a review team to carry out a second evaluation of UNRWA to ascertain if the organization was making every effort to maintain impartiality and to address claims of grave violations when they materialize.

The group, led by Catherine Colonna, a former French foreign minister, released its findings in April 2024. According to Lazzarini, UNRWA is totally committed to the panel’s recommendations and has already begun putting them into practice. OIOS stated that it had probed the charges made against 19 UNRWA employees and dismissed 10 of them, including one for lack of proof and nine for inadequate evidence.

“In one case, no evidence was obtained by OIOS to support the allegations of the staff member’s involvement, while in nine other cases, the evidence obtained by OIOS  was insufficient to support the staff members’ involvement. The employment of these individuals will be terminated in the interests of the agency,” UN Deputy Spokesperson Farhan Haq stated. “I have decided that in the case of these remaining nine staff members, they cannot work for UNRWA. All contracts of these staff members will be terminated in the interest of the agency,” announced Lazzarini.

Gilad Erdan, Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations responded, “The UN investigation, which focused solely on 19 UNRWA employees, is a disgrace. It is too little, too late – ignoring thousands of agency employees involved to various degrees in Hamas’s terror activities. Israel provided the UN with detailed information regarding over 100 UNRWA employees who were direct members of the terrorist organization Hamas. Despite Israel’s extensive cooperation with, and provision of information to, the UN, its investigation’s conclusions are yet another disgrace.”

“It still refuses to recognize the reality of its agency and if that wasn’t enough, the UN Secretary General recently chose to award UNRWA’s Gaza division his prestigious Secretary General’s Award for 2023 – the very group with such terror ties. The Secretary General must resign, and UNRWA must be shut down. Israel should act swiftly to outlaw UNRWA, declare it a terrorist organization, expel its leaders from Israel and deny them further entry.” he demanded.

Interestingly, Israel Katz, Israel’s foreign minister, later declared that Israel had barred Guterres from visiting the nation, pointing out that he was “backing” Iran, Hezbollah, Hamas and the Houthi extremists.

Hamas tunnels under UNRWA’s Gaza headquarters

The Israeli military shared that the Hamas concealed one of its most important assets beneath the Gaza Strip offices of UNRWA. Complete with an electrical room, industrial battery power banks, and living quarters for the terrorists running the computer servers, the underground data center was constructed just beneath the spot where Israel would neither search nor consider launching an airstrike.

Unsurprisingly, the outfit repeatedly refuted Israeli allegations that the Jewish country had uncovered a vast system of Hamas tunnels beneath hospitals, schools and other public buildings in the past. A “tunnel shaft” close to a school run by the ‘humanitarian organization’ was located during operations in Gaza City, according to the Israeli Army and the Shin Bet security agency.

“The shaft led to an underground terror tunnel that served as a significant asset of Hamas’s military intelligence and passed under the building that serves as UNRWA’s main headquarters in the Gaza Strip,” Israel revealed.

“Electrical infrastructure in the tunnel – 700 metres (765 yards) long and 18 metres deep – connected to the agency’s headquarters indicating that UNRWA’s facilities supplied the tunnel with electricity,” they added. Reporters descended to the concrete-lined tunnel by entering a pit next to a school. According to the army lieutenant-colonel in charge of the operation, they passed beneath UNRWA Headquarters after twenty minutes of traveling through the oppressively hot, tortuous, and small tube.

The Israeli military noted that the tunnel split at certain points, exposing side rooms. Steel safes, that had been opened and emptied, were present in an office area. There were industrial battery stacks in one chamber and computer servers in another. “Everything is conducted from here. All the energy for the tunnels, which you walked through them are powered from here. This is one of the central commands of the intelligence. This place is one of the Hamas intelligence units, where they commanded most of the combat,” the lieutenant-colonel mentioned.

Furthermore, he stated that Hamas seemed to have fled in response to the Israeli assault, proactively cutting off communications cables that he had seen passing through the basement floor of UNRWA headquarters. He voiced, “We know that they (Hamas) have people working in UNRWA. We want every international organization to work in Gaza. That is not a problem. Our problem is the Hamas.”

According to the joint statement, records and a cache of weaponry found within the UN property “confirmed that the offices had in fact also been used by Hamas terrorists.” IDF seized a number of intelligence assets and many blast doors from there. Large amounts of weaponry, such as rifles, ammunition, grenades, and explosives, were also found stashed in the building’s offices.

However, the UN body alleged that Israeli forces ordered its employees to evacuate its Gaza city facility as the bombing in the area intensified. “We have not used that compound since we left it nor are we aware of any activity that may have taken place there,” it claimed. The compound was last examined in September 2023, based on a statement. On the other hand, UNRWA knew the tunnel existed and had turned down an invitation to inspect it, per a spokesman for the Israeli government.

Anti-semitism in UNRWA classrooms

UNRWA has failed to remove inflammatory information that glorifies terrorism and demonizes Israel from its school curriculum, according to a report by an Israeli nonprofit organisation in 2023. Although it had previously promised to remove such content and implement a zero-tolerance policy for employees who incite racism or murder, the report, which was released by the Institute for Monitoring Peace and Cultural Tolerance in School Education (IMPACT-se) in collaboration with the UN Watch NGO (non-governmental organization) uncovered 47 new instances of provocation by UNRWA teachers and staff.

“Regularly call for the murder of Jews, and create teaching materials that glorify terrorism, encourage martyrdom, demonize Israelis, and incite antisemitism,” IMPACT-se reported in a statement about the agency’s employees and schools that educate Palestinian children in the West Bank, Gaza Strip and other places. A UNRWA math instructor in Syria promoted a terrorist who killed four civilians and a police officer in a shooting attack in the city of Bnei Brak in March 2022 in a Facebook post, in one of the incidents covered in the report.

The terrorist Diaa Hamarsheh was termed a “martyr” whose name ought to “remain in letters of fire, might, and magnificence forever.” Another UNRWA teacher, in Lebanon, called Ibrahim al-Nabulsi of the Al-Aqsa Martyr’s Brigade “the noblest of souls” in a different social media post. He was eliminated during an Israeli operation in 2022. At the terrorist’s burial, there were calls for people to follow in the “martyr’s” footsteps.

A picture of Adolf Hitler dozing was shared online by a Syrian UNRWA staffer, who urged the Nazi leader to awaken because “there are still some people you need to burn.” It appeared that other UNRWA staff members endorsed the message. It “captured evidence taken from inside UNRWA classrooms, showing the teaching of these materials, and revealing how UNRWA’s own content directs students to study specific hateful passages in Palestinian textbooks – which the organization claims teachers are told to skip,” according to the report.

Middle school boys were urged to seek martyrdom in one classroom in Gaza. A reading comprehension assignment that was assigned to the students in December 2022 praised a Palestinian firebombing attack on an Israeli bus as a “barbecue party.” In a further instance, a map bearing the name Palestine was shown in a UNRWA classroom along with Israeli areas like Tel Aviv, Beersheba and Haifa as Palestinian cities. 133 UNRWA educators and staff were found to have promoted hate and violence on social media and 82 others connected to 30 of the organization’s schools had participated in “drafting, supervising, approving, printing, and distributing hateful content to students.”

“Educators who incite hate and violence are removed from their posts around the world,” stated UN Watch Director Hillel Neuer who added, “Yet UNRWA, despite proclaiming ‘zero tolerance’ for incitement, systematically employs preachers of anti-Jewish hate and terrorism. Let us be clear: the problem is not the social media posts, but rather the employment of teachers who preach antisemitism and terrorism.”

He called on UNRWA to uphold its declared zero-tolerance policy and fire any staff members who are shown to have encouraged bigotry or homicide. He also demanded that UNRWA employees to be the subject of an independent inquiry concerning “systemic incitement to antisemitism and terrorism.” A commission to inquire the misuse of European Union aid provided to Palestine was also established as a result of the startling IMPACT-se findings.

Gaza schools run by Hamas men employed by UNRWA

“UNRWA has taken no meaningful steps to address the glorification of violence or antisemitic rhetoric in these schools,” per a 2024 IMPACT-se report, which also highlighted that many of its employees who have taken part in Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad activities continue to be on the payroll of the UN agency. UNRWA in the Gaza Strip employed more than 10% of its senior education professionals and principals who were from Hamas.

The assessment, which included data from the Israel Defense Forces, described actions at five schools in Gaza that it asserted were operated by members of terror groups who simultaneously held high educational officer positions at UNRWA.

The assessment listed: Al Zeitoun Boys Preparatory and Elementary Schools, whose principal Mohammad Juma Shuwaideh was a squad commander in Hamas Gaza City Brigade; the Al-Maghazi Boys Preparatory School B, where both the principal Khaled Said Mustafa Al-Massri and deputy principal Ahmad Samir Mahmoud El Khatib are squad commanders in Hamas Khan Younis Brigade; the Al-Mughraqa Boys Elementary School, whose principal, Raed Khaled Abu Mukhadda is a Hamas operative in the Deir al-Balah Battalion; Nuseirat Boys Preparatory C School, headed by Mahmoud Faez Sarraj, a Hamas military wing operative in the Nuseirat Battalion; and Ahmad Abdel Aziz Boys Preparatory School, led by Mahmoud Ahmad Hamdan, a Hamas member who openly promoted the violent “March of Return” border Gaza border protests.

A blackboard in a 5th-grade classroom at the Al-Zeitoun School had a picture of Dalal Mughrabi, one of the perpetrators of the 1978 Coastal Road Massacre, which ended the lives of 38 Israelis, with text calling her a “fighting leader” as well as “hero” was one of the examples in the report. The watchdog underscored materials, including maps, that erased the Jewish state or referred to Israeli cities as Palestinian, and stated content at the Al-Maghazi School addressed a firebombing attack on an Israeli bus as a “barbecue party.” “Liberating the Al-Aqsa Mosque and making sacrifices for it is an obligation for all Muslims,” read another statement on an exam paper featuring the UNRWA logo.

The Jordanian Waqf has administrative authority over the Al-Aqsa Mosque, on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem’s Old City. Hamas dubbed their 7th October attack in southern Israel the “Al-aqsa Flood.” Many Palestinian terrorists declared that their motivation stemmed from alleged concerns over the mosque. IMPACT-se conveyed that, “a virtual self-evaluation exam created by UNRWA’s Gaza education department gratuitously inserts content promoting hatred of Israel into grammar exercises.” As in previous reports, it suggested that in contrast to the UN agency’s statements, the number of individuals who have engaged in terrorist activities is not “a few isolated cases” and its connections to terrorism are “endemic.”

“This latest IMPACT-se report emphasizes that by promoting violence and demonizing Israel, UNRWA schools in Gaza foster the kind of hatred that fuelled the atrocities of 7th October 2023. These latest revelations about Hamas’s central role in UNRWA schools further reinforce that its educational system is not fit for purpose,” it emphasised. Marcus Sheff, CEO of IMPACT-se, stated that the results were “deeply concerned, although not surprised.”

“UNRWA has repeatedly failed to act, despite mounting evidence and repeated warnings of the deep influence of terror groups on UNRWA’s schools. This is not just about accountability, but about protecting young minds from an education that fuels hatred and extremism,” he expressed per an IMPACT-se’s statement.

With headquarters in Israel and the United Kingdom, the group has been keeping an eye on school curricula worldwide, with a special emphasis on the Middle East, since the late 1990s. For years, IMPACT-se has been highlighting cases about what it insists is anti-Israel indoctrination in Palestinian textbooks, including as the celebration of violent jihad, martyrdom and the systematic erasure of Israel’s existence.

UNRWA’s deliberate negligence and mockery of serious concerns

Israeli officials also gave a list of 100 UNRWA officials to “The New York Times.” A significant portion of the agency’s workforce, school personnel provide a window into the evidence supporting Israel’s assertions. The most strong proof of the scope of Hamas’s participation within UNRWA schools had been provided by the confiscated documents and interviews with current and former UNRWA staff, residents and former students in Gaza. Even when Israel issued written warnings that the educators were terrorists, UNRWA continued to employ them in a number of situations.

Ahmad al-Khatib was a deputy principal of a United Nations agency for Palestinian refugees elementary school in Gaza but according to papers, he was viewed by Hamas military branch as something quite different: an infantryman based in Khan Younis, a city in southern Gaza. The Qassam Brigades, the military wing, maintained detailed records of its combatants, monitoring the weaponry they were provided and routinely assessing everything from their devotion to their fitness. Among them was al-Khatib, who has worked for the UN body since 2013.

He was a specialist in ground combat, had been handed at least a dozen weapons, including a Kalashnikov and hand grenades and held the position of squad commander, based on secret internal Hamas records that the Israeli government revealed. He was one of at least 24 members of UNRWA who belonged to the terrorist groups and worked in 24 separate schools. The agency was in charge of 288 schools in Gaza before the war, spread across 200 distinct building sites.

According to the records, the majority were principals or deputy principals, who were the highest ranking officials at the schools. Others were teachers and school counselors. Records demonstrated that nearly all of the educators with ties to Hamas served as combatants in the Qassam Brigades. During their operation in Gaza, the Israeli military also reported to have seized several documents.

Israel stated that the structures were lawful targets under international law since Hamas used them for military reasons and to hide its terrorists. Secret Hamas military blueprints illustrated how the Qassam Brigades viewed schools and other public buildings as “the best obstacles to protect the resistance” during conflict with Israel. Two schools in particular were highlighted as being intended to serve combatants to conceal and store weapons.

It seemed that the group’s influence in education expanded beyond of Gaza. Hamas declared that its leader in Lebanon, a former head of UNRWA’s teachers union there and a school principal, had passed away. Interviews with locals in Gaza unveiled that the existence of Hamas agents in UNRWA classrooms was a well-known fact. It was unclear from the documents if all 24 educators took part in direct combat, but at least one-third of them were provided with the means to do so, according to the data and interviews.

Mustafa al-Farra and Ayman al-Alami were identified as UNRWA teachers in Jabalia and Khan Younis, respectively. Israel has recovered personnel documents from several Qassam Brigades that independently identify them as combatants. Furthermore, according to documents on the letterhead of the military wing, al-Farra was given an AK-47, and in 2023 al-Alami took part in a training program for Hamas rocket-launching.

When UNRWA learned in 2011 that one of its educators, Naji Abu Aziz, was a Hamas terrorist, it did start an investigation, but stated in a letter to the foreign ministry at the time that it required additional proof. The ministry retorted that disclosing such details could endanger intelligence sources. Abu Aziz was listed in documents later taken by the Israeli forces as a member of military manufacturing department’s chemistry unit of Hamas. The possible connection between him and Hamas also came to light in 2020 via a Telegram account. A captured Hamas verified the same and recommended that the account be hacked and closed.

Tunnels beneath or next to the agency’s schools did not result in the firing of Hamas members. A tunnel under the Maghazi Prep B Boys School in central Gaza was spotted by UNRWA in 2017 after which it claimed to have moved to close exits and allegedly launched a protest with Hamas. According to the seized documents, Khaled al-Masri, the school’s principal, was a Hamas member who was given a handgun and an assault rifle. He was also seen on Facebook standing in front of a Hamas banner. According to UNRWA, he was still employed there but was probed for a social media infraction.

According to Israeli officials, their soldiers raided a subterranean shaft adjacent to another UNRWA school that led to a weaponized tunnel that was almost half a mile long and ran beneath the school. Mohammed Shuwaideh, the principle, was listed in the seized Hamas documents as a deputy squad commander with engineering experience. However, Lazzarini argued that the principle could not be implicated just because a shaft was nearby but Shuwaideh was placed on administrative leave later.

“The UN has been unable and or unwilling to eliminate Hamas militants and their supporters, as well as those from other terrorist groups, from their ranks. UNRWA hiring practices and the makeup of the labor pool from which UNRWA draws its employees suggests to me that the numbers the Israelis are talking about are probably pretty close to the truth,” James Lindsay, who served as UNRWA’s general counsel until 2007 stated.

The Palestinian refugee crisis has been sustained by Israel’s long-standing antagonistic relationship with UNRWA, which it charges has allowed the status to be passed down through the generations. Over the past ten years, Israel has become more frustrated with UNRWA in Jerusalem after discovering that the terror organization Hamas, which rules Gaza, has roots in the organization’s infrastructure. This rage has reached a fever pitch since the 7th October Hamas attack, in which some UNRWA employees were discovered to have taken part, including in the kidnapping and murdering of Israeli victims.

The Hamas Nukhba commander who directed the murder and abduction of Israelis from a roadside bomb shelter close to Kibbutz Reim on 7th October was killed in an Israeli attack, according to UNRWA, which confirmed that the individual had worked for the organization since July 2022.

After Israel’s 1948 War of Independence, UNRWA was founded in 1949. Millions of Palestinians in Gaza, the West Bank and the surrounding Arab nations of Syria, Lebanon and Jordan allegedly get aid, healthcare and education from it. It is just one of two UN agencies that deal with refugees. The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees is in charge of all other refugees worldwide, whereas UNRWA only caters to Palestinians.

The UN has stated time after time that UNRWA is the only option while Israel charged that other agencies which are less tainted by terrorism can execute the same work. Since Donald Trump regained office, the agency and its corrupted past have once again come under scrutiny due to recent events.

USAID, which wanted to bring colour revolution in India, told its media ecosystem to maintain ‘strategic silence’, referred to Rana Ayyub in its propaganda guide

The controversial United States Agency for International Development (USAID), which had attempted to bring about a ‘colour revolution’ in India through its affiliates, has witnessed a recent crackdown by the Trump administration.

The so-called ‘independent organisation’ has been taken over completely by the US State Department. Donald Trump had informed how USAID was being run by ‘radical lunatics’. Elon Musk had dubbed it a ‘criminal organisation.’

Although the website of USAID has been taken down, a 96-page ‘Disinformation Primer’ published by it in February 2021 is doing the rounds of the internet.

The document was prepared with the ‘stated objective’ of helping its staff and partners understand disinformation, modes of its spread and ways to combat it.

Disinformation Primer by USAID

In reality, it was a propaganda ‘guide’ to help the USAID team to peddle influence in foreign countries, co-opt the media ecosystem and civil society and bring about ‘regime change’ in the host nation.

All of this was shrewdly framed as an effort to combat ‘information disorder.’

Page 2 of the report stated, “USAID staff and partners around the world need a working knowledge of the scope and form of disinformation since it impacts many levels of programming and interventions across all development sectors.

While USAID did not elaborate on its many levels of ‘interventions’, its track record in other countries shows us a grim picture.

OpIndia has previously reported in detail about the US agency’s efforts to destabilise governments in several nations including India through its ‘partners’ and affiliates.

USAID and its reference to Rana Ayyub

The Disinformation Primer which claims to train USAID staff and partners to fight ‘information disorder’, ironically cites the example of a habitual fake news peddler Rana Ayyub to explain the harms of ‘disinformation.’

Page 16 of the report claims –

In India, journalist Rana Ayyub was slandered by fake images and tweets insinuating that she was a porn actress. The coordinated attacks occurred after Ayyub began fighting for the justice of an 8-year-old girl who was raped over several days and then murdered. The doctored video of Ayyub was shared over 40,000 times, including a share by the ruling nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) fan page. It ultimately sent her to the hospital for heart palpitations and anxiety.

It is interesting to note how USAID made it a point to refer to the ‘ruling nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)’ while talking about a morphed video of the scam-accused ‘journalist.’ This is despite the fact that the Indian political party was not directly involved in the dissemination of the said video.

A random, so-called fan page was ‘referenced’ to malign the ruling, democratically elected party in the country.

USAID similarly made multiple references to India in its ‘Disinformation Primer’ including a unique, election campaign strategy used by BJP to reach out to linguistic voters. It even cited the Qatar-funded Islamist propaganda front, Al Jazeera, to defame India.

USAID reveals its strategy

On Page 18 of the report, the US agency inadvertently gave away its strategy.

It stated,”In countries where both the United States and Russia have been working to develop influence, the Kremlin tends to put forth narratives that are easy to understand, play to the emotions, and disingenuously offer a clear good guy–bad guy paradigm. Comparatively, the United States has often struggled to offer effective fact-based alternatives to such narratives. This is particularly relevant in countries where USAID works to promote democratic governance.

USAID conceded that it interferes in the functioning of the foreign government in the name of promoting democracy and competes with Russia to peddle influence on behalf of the US Deep State.

Screengrab of the USAID primer

Further on page 45 of its ‘Disinformation Primer’, it recommended its media ecosystem to maintain ‘strategic silence’. Another strategy that it advocated throughout its report was of ‘fact checking’ as a means to influence and sway public opinion.

The US State Department is implementing the project starting 1st September this year in 5 cities of India – Kolkata, Hyderabad, Chennai, Mumbai and Delhi.

Screengrab of the grant proposal

In July last year, OpIndia reported how the Public Diplomacy Section (PDS) of the US State Department set aside a whopping $2,00,000 (~₹1.67 crores) to recruit fact-checkers in India as part of its ‘Empowering Media Savvy Youth.’

This scheme of hiring ‘fact-checkers’ to promote its narrative in India has been shrewdly called a ‘targeted digital literacy and resilience program.’

In India, where social media usage is widespread among the youth population, recent research by Indian, European, and American think tanks has highlighted how manipulative content is amplifying societal polarization and erodes institutional trust. This consequently strains U.S.-India bilateral relations, threatening collaborative efforts and diplomatic ties,” the US State Department made its agenda crystal clear.

Coincidentally, USAID is now taken over by the same US State Department.

USAID promotes Atlantic Council, which targeted Modi govt

In its 96-page ‘Disinformation Primer’, USAID promoted the ‘Atlantic Council‘ and its links over 30 different times.

In July 2022, Mike Benz, Executive Director of the Foundation for Freedom Online, wrote a detailed article on how USAID and other government organisations funded censorship initiatives in Brazil via Atlantic Council.

The article indicated that US tax dollars, through agencies like USAID, the State Department, and the National Endowment for Democracy, had financed efforts to monitor and suppress private communications on encrypted messaging platforms such as WhatsApp and Telegram.

These initiatives aimed to counter “disinformation” by scrutinising private messages, thereby influencing political discourse and potentially affecting electoral outcomes.

Interestingly, Benz shared videos of an event by the Atlantic Council where a panel discussed how to “coordinate digital speech bans in response to what were considered two undesirable electoral outcomes in 2018: the rise of Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil, and the consolidation of voter support for Narendra Modi in India.”

In the clip shared, Fergus Bell, a journalist and media innovator, “flagged” the “danger of family WhatsApp groups” in India because people in India tend to trust their own family members over so-called “fact-checkers.” Benz pointed out that Bell had created a global media network to “coordinate social media censorship in target countries all over the world through an alliance of privileged fact-checkers and vetted mainstream media journalists.”

During the discussion, Fergus Bell highlighted the challenges of fact-checking in India, particularly during elections. He pointed out, “The danger of family WhatsApp groups in India is significant because people tend to trust their family members over fact-checkers.” Bell reflected on his experiences working on elections in both Indonesia and India, noting the complexities posed by encrypted messaging platforms like WhatsApp.

In March 2023, OpIndia, in its extensive coverage of Twitter Files, revealed how Atlantic Council’s DFR Lab wanted to censor Twitter handles associated with BJP.

USAID, George Soros and ‘colour revolution’ in India

In March 2017, the Heritage Foundation published a report detailing how USAID worked in close association with far-left billionaire George Soros during the Obama administration to promote its ‘radical agendas’ in several countries.

The report stated, “…Evidence is emerging that during the past eight years, Soros, his Open Societies Foundations (OSF), and their many smaller affiliates have received U.S. taxpayer money through USAID and that USAID has made the OSF the main implementer of its aid.

It may be recalled that George Soros, who worked with USAID, had been eyeing a colour revolution in India.

Screengrab of the Google cache of the now-deleted USAID website

In February 2023, the far-left billionaire exploited the Adani-Hindenburg controversy and launched a scathing attack on the Indian government.

He claimed, “Modi and business tycoon Adani are close allies. Their fate is intertwined…Adani Enterprises tried to raise funds in the stock market, but it failed. Adani is accused of stock manipulation and his stock collapsed like a house of cards.”

Soros accused Prime Minister Narendra Modi of crony capitalism. “Modi is silent on the subject, but he will have to answer questions from foreign investors and in parliament,” he added.

The Hungarian-American billionaire also said that the ‘shakedown’ caused to the Indian markets due to the Hindenburg Research report will result in ‘much needed institutional reforms’ and ‘democratic revival’. 

George Soros and his vicious ecosystem of NGOs, activists and journalists had been trying to prove PM Modi as an ‘electoral autocrat’ who needed to be ousted for the ‘greater good’ of this country. And it has been a work in progress for a long time.

Dalit disillusionment in Delhi: AAP’s declining support, unfulfilled promises, and BJP’s strategic outreach ahead of assembly polls

As Delhi gears up for the upcoming assembly elections, a sharp shift in the political landscape is emerging, particularly among Dalit voters—once a steadfast pillar of the Aam Aadmi Party’s (AAP) electoral base. This critical demographic, long perceived as a reliable ally, is increasingly exhibiting signs of disillusionment due to unmet expectations and a growing sense that the immediate relief measures or “freebies” have overshadowed the need for sustainable, structural reforms.

While populist strategies, such as targeted subsidies and welfare schemes, have traditionally provided short-term relief, the inadequacies of these transient measures have become evident in the failure to address the deeper socio-economic challenges confronting Scheduled Caste (SC) communities in Delhi and beyond. Against this backdrop, the upcoming elections and the political commitment to Dalit welfare take centre stage in the debate—contrasting AAP’s performance with BJP’s emerging approach—which further fuels the discourse between transient populist incentives and long-term programmatic policies.

Disappointment among Dalit communities

The dissatisfaction among Dalit voters stems from unfulfilled promises and a perceived neglect of key community issues. Historically, prominent Dalit groups like the Ravidassia and Jatav communities backed AAP, but recent resignations by Dalit leaders from the party signal a broader loss of trust.

Sanitation workers, who form a substantial portion of the Dalit workforce, have expressed disappointment over the government’s inability to provide stable employment and improved working conditions. The promise of Rs 1 crore compensation for families of sanitation workers who lost their lives on duty remains largely unfulfilled, further deepening the sense of discontent. Additionally, the outsourcing of jobs that were previously reserved for Dalits has exacerbated economic insecurities within the community.

Beyond employment concerns, civic infrastructure remains a pressing issue. After a decade in power in Delhi and two years of controlling the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD), AAP faces criticism over deteriorating infrastructure, unaddressed garbage disposal issues, and the failure to regularize ad hoc employees, particularly those from marginalized backgrounds.

Neglect of Dalit-dominated areas

In Dalit-majority areas, frustrations with governance are palpable. Residents of Nai Basti, a Dalit-dominated colony in South Delhi’s Deoli, have voiced their disappointment with the local AAP MLA, citing unfulfilled promises and a lack of developmental progress. Similarly, in Shahabad-Mohammedpur in West Delhi’s Bijwasan, the Scheduled Caste community faces acute water shortages during the summer months. The absence of a railway overbridge in the area has led to persistent traffic congestion and safety concerns, highlighting the broader neglect of infrastructure in Dalit-majority regions.

Broken promises in education and welfare

Educational initiatives aimed at Dalit upliftment have also suffered setbacks. In Punjab, for instance, the AAP government delayed the implementation of the Centre’s Post-Matric Scholarship Scheme for Scheduled Castes, creating barriers to educational access for SC students. Such delays have caused unnecessary hardships for beneficiaries, undermining the intended impact of these programs.

BJP’s outreach: Representation and welfare initiatives

In contrast, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has actively sought to engage with Dalit voters through targeted welfare measures and grassroots outreach programs. Recognizing the growing dissatisfaction with AAP, the BJP has focused on initiatives designed to restore trust and provide tangible benefits to the community.

A notable initiative includes the “B.R. Ambedkar Stipend Scheme,” which offers a monthly stipend of Rs 1,000 to SC students enrolled in Industrial Training Institutes (ITIs), skill centres, and polytechnic colleges. Additionally, the BJP has pledged free education from kindergarten to post-graduation for underprivileged students in government institutions. Other welfare measures include a dedicated board for taxi and auto drivers, affordable meal schemes for slum dwellers, and life insurance plans. Furthermore, the regularization of 4,400 sanitation workers under Home Minister Amit Shah’s leadership reflects the party’s responsiveness to Dalit concerns. With initiatives such as Matru Suraksha Vandana, Atal Canteens, and the PM National Dialysis Programme, the BJP aims to enhance healthcare, nutrition, and financial relief for marginalized communities.

Beyond welfare policies, the BJP has strategically fielded Dalit candidates in general constituencies, moving beyond traditional caste-based electoral calculations. This approach aligns with Pitkin’s theory of representation, which emphasizes both descriptive (representation by identity) and substantive (representation of interests) aspects. The party’s decision to field Dalit candidates, notably Deepti Indora from Matia Mahal and Kamal Bagri from Ballimaran—both Muslim-majority constituencies—demonstrates an evolving electoral strategy centred on performance and popularity rather than rigid caste alignments.

Shifting sentiments confirmed by surveys

A recent survey conducted by the National Confederation of Dalit and Adivasi Organisations (NACDAOR) and The Convergent Media underscores AAP’s declining appeal among Dalit voters. According to the findings, 44% of Dalit respondents intend to vote for AAP, marking a decline from 53% in the 2020 elections. The survey highlights growing concerns over employment, sanitation, and education, reinforcing the broader sentiment of discontent within the community.

After a decade in power, AAP faces mounting criticism over its governance approach, particularly in Dalit-majority areas such as Valmiki colonies, where residents have accused the party of playing vote-bank politics. The exclusion of priests from Valmiki and Ravidas temples from an honorarium scheme has only fueled these frustrations. A common refrain among residents is that Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal has not visited their communities in years, further amplifying perceptions of neglect.

Freebies vs. Programmatic Politics

AAP’s governance model has heavily relied on welfare measures such as free bus rides for women, subsidized electricity, and free water supply. While these initiatives provide short-term relief, critics argue that they fail to address deeper structural issues. For instance, while free bus rides reduce transportation costs for daily commuters, they do not resolve the underlying challenges of overcrowding or inadequate maintenance of public transport systems.

Many voters now question whether these policies serve as genuine developmental strategies or merely as short-term vote-catching tools. A disillusioned former supporter articulated this frustration: “You can’t keep enticing people by giving free stuff. We need jobs, not just free electricity.”The failure to effectively balance populist measures with long-term developmental policies has exacerbated dissatisfaction, particularly in Dalit-majority areas where infrastructure and economic opportunities remain stagnant.

The road ahead

As Delhi approaches the upcoming elections, Dalit voters stand at a crucial crossroads. Their growing discontent with AAP’s governance model presents an opportunity for opposition parties to offer alternative solutions that address long-standing grievances. The BJP’s outreach efforts and welfare initiatives may resonate with sections of the Dalit electorate, potentially altering electoral dynamics in key constituencies.

The election will not only shape the political trajectory of Delhi but also serve as a broader indicator of how political parties engage with marginalized communities. For Dalit voters, the choice ahead involves evaluating past governance records against promises for the future, determining which party is best positioned to address their needs and aspirations.

Cow thieves should be shot on sight: Karnataka Minister Mankal Vaidya says as cow theft incidents rise in Uttar Kannada

0

As the cases of cow theft surge in Congress-ruled Karnataka’s Uttar Kannada district, District in-charge Minister Mankal Vaidya said that cow thieves should be shot dead in public.

“Arrests have been made (in some cases) – if such things continue – it may be wrong if I say this. I will ensure that they (the accused) are shot on the road. Work, earn and eat, there are enough jobs available in our district. We won’t support such people at any cost. …If we support such activities, how do FIRs and arrests happen? We are not sitting quietly, the department (police) is taking action to control it, the government is there. I’m here, all action is being taken. Neither the government nor the Chief Minister or Home Minister will support anyone on this issue. We will work to protect those rearing cows, there is no need to fear,”  Vaidya said.

Mankal Vaidya further assured that necessary steps will be taken to protect cows from thieves. Minister Vaidya’s comments came amidst outrage over the recent incident wherein a pregnant cow was slaughtered near Honnavar. In that incident, Police arrested Ahmed Jiddah, 41, a resident of Valki in Honnavar taluk of Uttara Kannada district, for beheading a pregnant cow and mutilation of its calf in a village in Honnavar.

The minister told the media that he has instructed the police to take stringent action against those who steal cows.

“Cow theft has been happening for several years. I have told the SP (Superintendent of Police) that this should stop and should not happen at any cost. It is wrong. We worship cows. We affectionately rear this animal. We grow up drinking its milk,” Vaidya said.

Meanwhile, Congress has started downplaying the comments and started distancing itself from Vaidya’s remarks. Karnataka Home Minister B Parmeshwara said, “I am not aware of Minister Vaidya’s statement. He might have made the statement in his personal capacity, perhaps in the heat of the moment.”

How the US Deep State, including agencies like USAID, tried to censor private messages, and used journalists and ‘fact-checkers’ to try and reduce support for PM Modi

The Donald Trump administration’s crackdown on the controversial United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has sent shock waves worldwide. New discoveries about USAID’s past involvement in regime change operations worldwide, efforts to undermine leaders disliked by left-liberals, and funding to terrorist outfits, have raised questions about the agency’s nefarious agenda.

For those who are unaware, USAID is allegedly an independent agency of the US government. Its stated main task was to administer civilian foreign aid and development assistance. This deep-state agency was founded in 1961 by then-President of the United States, John F Kennedy. USAID’s stated mission focused on promoting economic growth, supporting disaster relief, and fostering democratic governance globally. However, the mission remained intact only on paper.

Over the years, USAID managed significant budgets to drive its initiatives, which included toppling governments, establishing favourable regimes, creating hostile environments for political leaders left-liberals dislike, and more. Interestingly, a large chunk of US taxpayers’ money was used for these activities. In the 2023 fiscal year alone, the agency oversaw over $40 billion in appropriations, making up more than a third of the funds allocated to the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and related programs.

As Donald Trump took over the Oval Office in the White House for the second time this January, several major changes were made in the way the US government operates. Several agencies are either being shut down or drastically downsized, including USAID. Several accusations have been made by Elon Musk, the billionaire who is part of the Trump administration and is overseeing the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). In a recent statement on X, he said that USAID had used US taxpayers’ dollars to fund bioweapons research labs abroad, and the COVID pandemic was the consequence of one such research project.

Musk had posted the above message in response to a post claiming that USAID had collaborated with Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance on the PREDICT program, which identified 1,200 new viruses, trained 5,000 people globally in disease detection, and enhanced 60 research labs.

The Atlantic Council and the Global Push for Digital Censorship

Before understanding what the Atlantic Council is, it is essential to understand how it has set the stage in global censorship efforts. Messaging platforms such as WhatsApp and Telegram have always been in the cross-hair of the censorship industry, as information flows freely on these platforms without much intervention from the so-called fact-checking institutes. Such information can even influence the results of elections.

The label of “WhatsApp University” is often used in India whenever some uncomfortable fact emerges against the opposition, especially when it is promoted by those who support the ruling party. There is misinformation and disinformation at play on messaging apps. Specifically targeting only one side and turning a blind eye to misinformation from the other side is what “fact-checkers” have been doing. We’ll come to the reason for this later.

Setting the groundwork for censorship

The seeds of text message censorship were sown in the aftermath of Bolsonaro’s win in Brazil. In June 2019, the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab (DFRLab) hosted an #ElectionWatch panel at its global disinformation summit in London, explicitly targeting Brazilian populist voter sentiment expressed through private messaging apps. The Council’s partnership with Facebook in May 2018, which aimed to “counter disinformation,” only intensified its role in monitoring and influencing online narratives worldwide.

By the summer of 2019, the Atlantic Council’s taxpayer-funded censorship coordinators had started focusing on private messaging apps in countries like Brazil and India. Their reasoning? Cultural norms in these countries that emphasise trust in family were seen as undermining faith in institutions. This trust in familial communication was flagged by digital speech monitors as a potential threat to democracy, justifying the push for increased scrutiny and control over private conversations.

The role of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED)

Alongside the Atlantic Council, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) has played a significant role in coordinating global internet censorship efforts. Founded in 1983, NED has long been criticised as a semi-covert facilitator of US-backed coups, with a 1991 Washington Post article famously describing it as a “privatised branch of the CIA.” NED’s co-founder, Allen Weinstein, admitted, “A lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA.”

In recent years, NED has pivoted towards orchestrating global internet censorship practices under the guise of “countering disinformation.” In 2022, US taxpayers, via USAID, funded a NED operations manual for coordinating digital speech crackdowns, available publicly at counteringdisinformation.org. Promotional materials, co-produced by USAID and NED, highlighted their collaborative efforts in regulating online speech through the Consortium for Elections and Political Process Strengthening (CEPPS).

PM Modi – A major political target of disinformation campaigns

While Trump’s crackdown on the agency continues, experts on several occasions raised concerns about USAID’s involvement in Indian politics and how it was trying to influence elections against Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The targeting of PM Modi has been meticulously designed by several agencies, organisations, and individuals, as his being in power is not favourable to their agenda.

In July 2022, Mike Benz, Executive Director of the Foundation for Freedom Online, wrote a detailed article on how USAID and other government organisations funded censorship initiatives in Brazil via Atlantic Council. The article indicated that US tax dollars, through agencies like USAID, the State Department, and the National Endowment for Democracy, had financed efforts to monitor and suppress private communications on encrypted messaging platforms such as WhatsApp and Telegram. These initiatives aimed to counter “disinformation” by scrutinising private messages, thereby influencing political discourse and potentially affecting electoral outcomes.

Interestingly, Benz shared videos of an event by the Atlantic Council where a panel discussed how to “coordinate digital speech bans in response to what were considered two undesirable electoral outcomes in 2018: the rise of Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil, and the consolidation of voter support for Narendra Modi in India.”

In the clip shared, Fergus Bell, a journalist and media innovator, “flagged” the “danger of family WhatsApp groups” in India because people in India tend to trust their own family members over so-called “fact-checkers.” Benz pointed out that Bell had created a global media network to “coordinate social media censorship in target countries all over the world through an alliance of privileged fact-checkers and vetted mainstream media journalists.”

During the discussion, Fergus Bell highlighted the challenges of fact-checking in India, particularly during elections. He pointed out, “The danger of family WhatsApp groups in India is significant because people tend to trust their family members over fact-checkers.” Bell reflected on his experiences working on elections in both Indonesia and India, noting the complexities posed by encrypted messaging platforms like WhatsApp.

He emphasised how these private communication channels shape political discourse, making it difficult to “counter misinformation,” especially narratives that favour the ruling party, BJP. Bell suggested that this trust in personal networks creates an environment where official fact-checking efforts struggle to gain traction.

The event took place after the 2019 Lok Sabha elections. Here, while Bell pointed out that it was difficult to counter narratives in favour of the ruling party, BJP, it is clear that his remarks, though framed as “difficulty in fighting misinformation,” reflected the discontent of individuals like him who were disheartened by their failure to counter narratives favouring PM Modi.

In August 2024, Benz posted an almost 49-minute-long clip of a live stream where he talked in detail about the censorship on social media, with the Atlantic Council being a crucial player in it. He mentioned the article written by him. He pointed out that not only USAID but other government arms, such as the State Department and others, were paying annually to the Atlantic Council, which trains journalists from Reuters, The New York Times, and other publications to flag certain information in Trump’s social media posts.

He pointed out that the Atlantic Council has seven CIA directors on its board. He said, “A lot of people don’t know that seven of the top chiefs of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) are still alive, let alone all concentrated together on the board of a single institution promoting worldwide social media censorship on politicians like Donald Trump, Yair Bolsonaro, Modi in India, and Marine Le Pen in France.”

What is Atlantic Council

The Atlantic Council is a Washington, DC-based think tank. It primarily focuses on the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), transatlantic relations, and global affairs. It has 16 different centres and programs worldwide. Atlantic Council claims to conduct research and provide policy recommendations on topics such as climate change, economic development, democracy advocacy, and security.

Founded in 1961 by a group of former US government officials, including Secretaries of State Dean Acheson and Christian Herter, alongside other policymakers, Atlantic Council’s goal was to strengthen US-European relations following the formation of NATO in 1949. Furthermore, it aimed at promoting active US engagement in international politics. Over time, the Council expanded its influence and established itself as a key player in transatlantic policy discussions.

Initially, its focus was concentrated around public opinion research about NATO and international alliances. In the 1970s, it began publishing essays and books advocating US foreign interventionism. By the 1980s, it introduced training programs for political leaders and hosted high-profile conferences attended by figures like Ronald Reagan and Colin Powell. After the Soviet Union collapsed in the 1990s, its focus shifted to European integration, nuclear policy, and conflicts in the Balkans. Over the years, it has increasingly positioned itself as a thought leader on global governance and digital policy.

What Atlantic Council Does

The Atlantic Council operates through various policy-focused centres that research and publish reports on global issues. Some of its key centres include:

  • Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security – Focuses on intelligence and diplomatic strategies.
  • Adrienne Arsht-Rockefeller Foundation Resilience Center – Works on climate change policies.
  • GeoEconomics Center – Researches global economic trends.
  • Digital Forensic Research Lab (DFRLab) – Claims to combat misinformation and digital threats.
  • Global Energy Center – Studies renewable energy policies.
  • Eurasia Center and Europe Center – Promote democratic governance in Eastern Europe.
  • South Asia Center – Encourages U.S. diplomatic engagement in Asia.

Funding For The Council

The Atlantic Council is heavily funded by the U.S. government and private entities. Its funding also includes contributions from foreign governments, corporate donors, and philanthropic foundations. It claims to maintain intellectual independence, but its funding sources raise questions about potential influence over its research and policy recommendations.

US Government Funding

The Atlantic Council receives annual funding from US taxpayers through agencies such as:

  • Department of State and Department of Defense – Contributed over $500,000 each in 2021.
  • USAID and Department of Energy – Each donated between $250,000 and $500,000 in 2021.

Other US government donors include the Environmental Protection Agency, US Air Force, US Marine Corps, US Navy, and the US Embassy in Chile.

A report by the Quincy Institute in 2025 revealed that the Atlantic Council had received over $8 million from the US government since 2019, ranking it among the top government-funded think tanks.

Other Funding

Beyond U.S. government support, the Atlantic Council receives substantial funding from foreign governments, corporations, and private donors:

  • Foreign Governments – The Council received $20.8 million from foreign governments since 2019, making it the top recipient of foreign funding among U.S. think tanks.
  • Major Donors – Entities such as the UAE Embassy, British Foreign Commonwealth Office, Facebook, Goldman Sachs, and the Rockefeller Foundation have each contributed at least $1 million in recent years.
  • Corporate and Philanthropic Backers – Other donors include Chevron, Google, Raytheon, Pfizer, and Open Society Foundations.

Both Rockefeller Foundation and Open Society Foundations being its backers raise serious concerns. OSF, is George Soros’s initiative and is involved in disruptions in governments in several countries including India.

According to its 2022-2023 annual report, the Atlantic Council’s revenue increased from $30 million in 2016 to $70 million in 2022, raising concerns about the extent of its influence and its financial dependencies.

Yearly Funding Breakdown

2019

In 2019, the Atlantic Council received $21.7 million in grants and donations. Its largest contributors included Adrienne Arsht, Facebook, Goldman Sachs, the Rockefeller Foundation, the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office, and the UAE Embassy. Other notable donors included Chevron, Google, and major defence contractors like Raytheon.

2020

In 2020, top contributors included philanthropist Adrienne Arsht and Goldman Sachs executive John FW Rogers, each donating at least $1 million. Other major donors included Crescent Petroleum, Google, PKO Bank Polski, and the US Department of State. Additionally, organisations such as Chevron, Open Society Policy Center, and the German Federal Foreign Office contributed significant amounts.

2021

In 2021, the Atlantic Council received major donations from the Charles Koch Foundation, Amazon, and Verizon. Other notable contributors included Google, Pfizer, Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, and the Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The Council’s growing corporate and government-backed funding sources continued to raise questions about its claimed intellectual independence.

2023

By 2023, the Council’s funding continued to surge, with major donors including Craig Newmark Philanthropies, the UAE Embassy, Goldman Sachs, Meta, and the US Department of Defense. Other donors included Abu Dhabi National Oil Company, Chevron, ExxonMobil, and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, further cementing its deep ties with corporate and governmental entities worldwide.

This extensive funding history raises concerns about the Atlantic Council’s impartiality, particularly given its strong advocacy for US foreign policy interests and its increasing role in shaping digital governance narratives globally.

What is DFRLab

Digital Forensic Research Lab (DFRLab), an Atlantic Council initiative, had speakers like Luiza Bandeira, Research Assistant, DFRLab (Latin America), Fergus Bell, Founder, Pop-up Newsroom Karen Rebelo, Deputy Editor, BOOM Live (India) Chris Roper, Deputy CEO, Code for Africa (South Africa).

The Digital Forensic Research Lab (DFRLab) at the Atlantic Council was established in 2016. It claims to focus on combating disinformation, analysing digital ecosystems, and promoting digital rights and democracy. On its website, It presents itself as a leader in open-source research on online harms, foreign interference, and platform policies, while also asserting its role in setting research standards and training others globally in digital investigation techniques.

DFRLab claims that it collaborates with governments, tech companies, media, and civil society to craft policy recommendations, supposedly to strengthen democratic institutions and foster digital resilience. However, their actions, impact and impartiality deserve deeper scrutiny.

USAID’s selective approach to disinformation – media silence on friendly narratives

In February 2021, USAID released a document titled Center of Excellence on Democracy, Human Rights and Governance – Disinformation Primer. It was released for internal use. USAID’s disinformation strategy lies in its selective approach to misinformation. While it actively promotes scrutiny and censorship of narratives opposing its interests, the document categorically calls for turning a blind eye to misleading claims from its allies. The document provides insight into the double standard of USAID, specifically in its recommendations for tackling misinformation.

Exposing “alternative” narratives while ignoring mainstream disinformation

USAID’s document discusses the need to “expose disinformation messages” and promote coordinated responses by media organisations, but its approach primarily targets non-mainstream media sources. According to the document, “Discussions on disinformation and misinformation often revolve around assumptions of state actors driving the issue. However, problematic information more regularly originates from networks of alternative sites and anonymous individuals who have created their own ‘alt-media’ online spaces.”

The narrative established in the document positions alternative media as the primary source of disinformation. It diverts attention away from misinformation spread by mainstream, corporate, and associate media outlets. This selective targeting ensures that media narratives aligned with USAID’s objectives remain unchecked.

Encouraging strategic silence on certain narratives

The document also explicitly advises media organisations to adopt “strategic silence” when handling certain types of misinformation. It notes, “Media organisations should collaborate and agree on policies for strategic silence.” This raises concerns about who decides which narratives deserve exposure and which ones should be ignored. By selectively ignoring misinformation from favoured groups while aggressively fact-checking opposition voices, USAID effectively creates an information monopoly.

Fact-checking as a political tool

USAID promoted the use of fact-checking to shape public opinion. At the same time, it acknowledged that fact-checking is not always an unbiased process. The document noted that fact-checking efforts are often mobilised by political campaigns or social movements. They can also identify trends and help trigger an institutional response by regulators, courts, or legislators. By linking fact-checking efforts to political and regulatory action, USAID ensured that disinformation countermeasures functioned as a political tool rather than an objective truth-seeking mechanism.

Targeting the ruling government in India

It is evident that the US deep state has attempted to influence democratic processes in India. When the coordinated efforts of USAID, the Atlantic Council, and their affiliate organisations are examined, it is clear that they have systematically targeted private messaging platforms like WhatsApp and Telegram—critical tools for political discourse in India, especially in favour of the ruling party.

The Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab (DFRLab), funded by US taxpayers through USAID and other federal agencies, focused on India in its 2019 disinformation summit. Fergus Bell, a key figure at this summit, flagged the so-called “danger of family WhatsApp groups,” lamenting that Indians trust their family members over ‘official’ fact-checkers. This trust in familial communication was framed as a threat to democracy, justifying increased scrutiny of private messages, particularly those supportive of the ruling BJP and Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Furthermore, USAID’s Disinformation Primer encouraged strategic silence when addressing misinformation from groups aligned with their agenda, while aggressively flagging narratives that went against their interests—in India’s case, from Modi supporters.

Not to forget, In March 2023, OpIndia, in its extensive coverage of Twitter Files, revealed how Atlantic Council’s DFR Lab wanted to censor Twitter handles associated with BJP.

An analyst named Andy Carvin wrote to top Twitter executives on June 8, 2021, “Hi guys. Attached you will find… around 40k Twitter accounts that our researchers suspect are engaging in inauthentic behaviour… and Hindu nationalism more broadly.”

The DFR Lab analyst flagged over 40,000 accounts, claiming that they were paid employees/ unpaid volunteer’s of India’s largest party, namely, the BJP.

Contrary to the wishes of the DFR Lab, the top Twitter executives refused to act on the flagged Twitter accounts. Yoel Roth, the former Global Head of Trust & Safety at Twitter, noted, “I spot-checked a number of these accounts, and virtually all appear to be real people.”

When OpIndia examined the list, we found at least 66 prominent and verified Indian Twitter handles were sent by US-funded Digital Forensic Research (DFR) Lab to the top executives of the social media giant for censorship.

The reason cited by the organisation was that they were connected to the BJP and the cause of Hindu Nationalism. The names included those of Kapil Mishra, Kuljeet Singh Chahal, Naveen Kumar Jindal, Suresh Nakhua and Tajinder Pal Singh Bagga.

Digging deeper into the Atlantic Council’s functioning has revealed that they trained journalists from major media outlets and embedded so-called fact-checkers aiming to suppress narratives that contributed to vote consolidation for PM Modi, especially during the 2019 Lok Sabha Elections. It is evident that such organisations, particularly those with links to Soros, would have worked during the 2024 Lok Sabha Elections as well to ensure BJP’s defeat. Going by the results, it is safer to say that they might have succeeded to some extent.

‘Nehru was more interested in Jacqueline Kennedy than JFK’: Insights from JFK’s Forgotten Crises, a book recommended by PM Modi

In a scathing attack against Congress and Rahul Gandhi, PM Modi on Tuesday (February 4) tore into former Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru and recommended the opposition MPs read JFK’s Forgotten Crises, a book by US foreign policy expert Bruce Reidel, which explores political and diplomatic challenges during John F. Kennedy’s presidency.

The suggestion came as Mr Modi took a swipe at critics of his government’s handling of the India-China border dispute, specifically in context with Congress MP Rahul Gandhi’s remarks on Monday and Samajwadi Party leader Akhilesh Yadav’s comments earlier that day. 

Modi pointed to former Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, stating that the book reveals “the games” Nehru played with the country’s security and what foreign policy meant for the Congress stalwart. 

“For those truly interested in foreign policy, I suggest reading JFK’s Forgotten Crises,” he said. “The book, written by a foreign policy scholar, mentions India’s first Prime Minister, who also held the Foreign Affairs portfolio. It includes his conversation with JFK during a crisis, detailing the actions taken in the name of foreign policy.”

Insights from JFK’s Forgotten Crises about India’s foreign policy handled by then PM Nehru

Nevertheless, as PM Modi drew attention to JFK’s ‘Forgotten Crises” book, it is worth noting what the book mentions about Kennedy’s wife’s visit to India and the handling of foreign relations by the then PM, Nehru, who also held the foreign portfolio.

In a conversation with John Kenneth Galbraith, the then US ambassador to India, US President John F Kennedy reportedly told him that Nehru was more interested in conversation with his wife, Jackie, than him. 

The book also mentions that when the US embassy had rented a villa for Mrs Kennedy, Nehru insisted that she stay in a guest suite at the Prime Minister’s residence, the same suite that was used by Edwina Mountbatten, the wife of the last viceroy Lord Mountbatten, who had presided over the partition. 

Furthermore, an account referenced in the book asserts Nehru was more interested in Pat Kennedy, an attractive 27-year-old sister of JFK than in either Jack or Bobby. 

The remarks followed Mr Gandhi’s claim in the House that India had lost over 4,000 sq km of territory to China. He alleged that the Prime Minister denied this, but the Army’s statements contradicted him. His comments triggered protests from the ruling party and were met with strong criticism from Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, who debunked the baseless claims attributed to the Army Chief by the Gandhi scion. 

“Gareebon ki baat boring hi lagegi”: PM Modi hits back at Congress leader Rahul Gandhi in Parliament

0

Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Tuesday took a veiled jab at the Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, saying that people who resort to “photo sessions” at the homes of the poor will find boring the discussion in Parliament about such deprived people.

“Those who get photo sessions done at the huts of poor people find talk on them boring,” the PM said during his reply today to the motion of thanks to President Droupadi Murmu’s address to the joint session of parliament.

Talking about the union government’s efforts in installing water taps in 12 crore houses, the PM added, “Our government has given tap water connections to 12 crore homes. We have worked so much for the welfare of the poor, and that is why the President also mentioned it in her speech.”

“If we have responsibility, then we cannot just identify the problem and leave it at that, we need to focus on finding solutions too,” PM Modi said.

Extending his criticism of Congress further, PM Modi also in a veiled reference to former PM Rajiv Gandhi said, “We had a PM, he wanted to be called Mr Clean, he understood the problem. He said if Rs 1 leaves Delhi then only 15 paisa reaches the poor. Only one party ruled in states and the centre. This was a pure loot, a very big ‘haath safai’.” the PM said.

“Our model is clear, Janata ka paisa, Janta ke liye (the public’s money is for the public itself),” the Prime Minister said.

Contrasting it with the efforts of the current government, he mentioned the government of India’s initiative, the “JAM Trinity,” which links Jan Dhan accounts, Aadhar cards, and Mobile numbers to give direct benefit transfers to people.

“We started giving DBT, Direct Benefit Transfer. We gave Rs 40 lakh crore in the bank accounts of people. But look at the previous governments, how it was run,” PM Modi said.

As the Opposition raised slogans and shouted during his speech, the PM hit back and said, “jabh zyada bukhar chadh jata hain tabh aadmi bahut bolta hain (people talk too much when they are disappointed).”

The Prime Minister said those who were not even born in India, they were benefitting from different government schemes. “To make sure that there is no injustice done to the innocent, we did not care for political gains and losses and removed the names of 10 crore such frauds and started the initiative to take the schemes to genuine beneficiaries,” he said.

“Those who were not even Indians, not even part of this country, took advantage of the Indian funds. Without caring about political benefits or anything, we removed 10 crore such frauds and gave them to real beneficiaries after looking for them,” he said.

“When the frauds were removed, then around Rs 3 lakh crore were saved from wrong hands. I am not naming whose hands they were, but they were wrong hands,” he said.

Further, PM Modi took another potshot apparently at Rahul Gandhi, who is often seen with a copy of the Constitution in his pocket, PM Modi said, “Those who carry copy of Constitution in their pockets can’t understand its importance.”

“It is unfortunate that today some people are speaking the language of urban Naxals openly, challenging the Indian state and declaring a fight against it. Those who speak this language neither understand the Constitution nor the unity of the nation,” he said.

The Prime Minister said that for seven decades, J&K and Ladakh were deprived of their constitutional rights. “This was an injustice not only to the Constitution but also to the people of these regions…We live by the spirit of the Constitution, and that is why we make strong decisions. Our Constitution does not give the right to discriminate. Those who live with the Constitution in their pockets do not know what kind of difficulties you forced Muslim women to live in…”

The Prime Minister also hit back at Rahul Gandhi over his OBC remarks in Lok Sabha.

“For some people, speaking about caste is fashion. For the last 30 years, OBC MPs have been demanding that OBC Commission be granted Constitutional status. Those who see a benefit in casteism today did not think of the OBC community back then,” he said.

“We granted Constitutional status to the OBC Commission. SC, ST and OBC get more opportunities in every sector – we have worked very strongly towards this. I pose an important question to the citizens through this House – have there even been three MPs simultaneously from the same family of SC community? I also ask, tell me if there ever were three MPs simultaneously from the same family belonging to the ST community…” He said that is a vast difference between the Opposition’s words and actions.

In his speech in Parliament on February 3, Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi mentioned the caste census and raised the issue of the participation of Dalits, OBC and Adivasis in the institutions of the country.

Rahul Gandhi raised various issues in Parliament, in which the Opposition criticised the government’s handling of the manufacturing sector, claiming that the government’s flagship programme, ‘Make in India’ had failed even after trying.

(This news report is published from a syndicated feed. Except for the headline, the content has not been written or edited by OpIndia staff)

Taliban Deputy Foreign Minister forced to flee Afghanistan after opposing ban on girls’ education

In Afghanistan, a senior Taliban Minister, Deputy Foreign Minister Mohammad Abbas Stanikzai, has been forced to flee from the country amid fears of arrest. The minister had advocated for lifting the ban on girls’ education in Afghanistan and has condemned the group’s ban on their education, calling it anti-Islamic.

On January 20, during a graduation ceremony in Khost province, near the Afghan-Pakistan border, Stanikzai spoke about opening schools for girls and said that banning their education was not in line with Shariah law. “There is no excuse for this – not now and not in the future. We are being unjust to 20 million people,” Stanikzai said, referring to the Afghanistani women and girls.

“During the time of the prophet Muhammad, the doors of knowledge were open for both men and women. There were such remarkable women that if I were to elaborate on their contributions, it would take a considerable amount of time,” the Afghanistan Minister added.

These comments of the the Minister fueled internal division, forcing the Taliban’s supreme leader, Hibatullah Akhundzada, to order his arrest. Akhundzada also issued a travel ban against him, prohibiting him from entering Afghanistan again.

Following this controversy, Stanikzai went to Dubai, as reported by the news channel Afghanistan International. However, the Taliban leader told the media that he has gone to Dubai for his medical treatment.

Notably, this is not the first time when the leader has raised his voice to support girl education. In 2022, he said that no one has a religious reason that can justify depriving girls of education, calling schools and colleges obligatory for both genders.

In December 2022, the Taliban regime banned university education for females. InAfghanistan, under the Taliban rule, access to universities for female students remains suspended. In a letter, confirmed by Ziaullah Hashimi, the spokesperson of Afghanistan’s Ministry of Education, all the public and private universities were instructed to suspend access to female students immediately, in compliance with the cabinet decision. 

“You are all informed to immediately implement the mentioned order of suspending female education until further notice,” said a letter signed by Minister of Higher Education Neda Mohammad Nadeem. The letter was addressed to all government and private universities.

Following the Taliban’s takeover of the country, universities were compelled to implement new rules, such as gender-segregated classrooms and entrances. Women were only permitted to be educated by women professors or old men. Girls in Afghanistan already had very limited access to secondary education and a ban imposed on their university education shattered their dreams of pursuing careers of their choice.

‘Words never spoken were attributed to Army Chief’: Defence Min Rajnath Singh slams Rahul Gandhi over claims on China

0

Defence Minister Rajnath Singh on Tuesday criticized Congress MP Rahul Gandhi for his speech in the Lok Sabha on Monday, accusing him of spreading “false allegations” against the Indian Army chief and making misleading remarks on the India-China border dispute.

“The Army Chief’s remarks referred only to the disturbance of traditional patrolling by both sides. He also mentioned that these practices have been restored to their traditional pattern as part of the recent disengagement. The government has shared these details in Parliament,” Singh tweeted while refuting Gandhi’s remarks.

While responding to the Motion of Thanks to President Droupadi Murmu’s address, the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha expressed concern that India’s reliance on Chinese products has become a significant security threat.

Rahul Gandhi further alleged that the Chief of Army Staff acknowledged the presence of Chinese forces within Indian territory. “This is a fact. The key issue is why China is inside our territory… The reason is that ‘Make in India’ has failed. China is occupying our land because India is not manufacturing enough. I fear that India is once again surrendering this industrial revolution to China,” he stated in Parliament.

Rajnath Singh rejected Rahul Gandhi’s statements, clarifying that the Army chief’s remarks only referred to the disruption of traditional patrolling by both India and China.

The Defence Minister further asserted that the words Rahul Gandhi attributed to the Army chief “were never spoken by him at any point.”

“Regrettably, Shri Rahul Gandhi is engaging in irresponsible politics on matters of national interest,” Singh stated in his post.

Addressing claims about China’s presence in Indian territory, he pointed out that any such occupation pertains to the 38,000 sq km in Aksai Chin lost after the 1962 war and the 5,180 sq km illegally ceded by Pakistan to China in 1963.