Home Blog Page 591

Day after Manish Sisodia said slums will remain in Delhi till Arvind Kejriwal is there, AAP supremo promises to build homes for sanitation workers

Days after Aam Aadmi Party candidate from Jangpura, and former Deputy CM Manish Sisodia assured that jhuggi clusters in the national capital cannot be removed calling it ‘Kejriwal’s promise’, AAP national convenor, Arvind Kejriwal claimed on Friday that he will build homes for the slumdwellers.

Sisodia had attacked the BJP by declaring the party as the biggest danger to slum dwellers in Delhi. During a roadshow in his assembly constituency, Sisodia said, “I am getting a lot of love and support from the people of Jangpura. It is a big day for me today. Poor law and order, rapes, chain-snatching, gang wars- BJP is behind all this. BJP has not been able to handle law and order here, so why should we give education and hospitals to them? Today, the BJP is the biggest danger to jhuggis in Delhi. If they come to power, all jhuggis will be razed. We are the only ones…who lie down in front of bulldozers to prevent such actions”.

Manish Sisodia also promised that jhuggis (slums) are there till Arvind Kejriwal is there.

Kejriwal now says he wants houses for all

Just a couple of days after Sisodia said slums will remain till Arvind Kejriwal is there, the AAP supremo claimed that he wrote a letter addressed to PM Modi requesting him to provide land to the Delhi government for building houses for sanitation workers employed in the NDMC and MCD areas.

“I want to draw your attention to a very important issue concerning the sanitation workers employed in the NDMC and MCD areas. These workers are the backbone of our city’s cleanliness system. During the service, they reside in government-provided accommodation. However, after retirement, they are required to vacate these houses. They are unable to purchase their own homes or afford the high rents in Delhi, leaving them and their families I’m a precarious situation”, said Kejriwal during a press conference.

He added, “Since land-related matters in Delhi fall under the purview of the central government, I request that the central government provide land to sanitation workers at concessional rates. The Delhi government can construct houses on this land for them, and the workers can repay the cost of these houses to the government in easy instalments”.

Kejriwal, who is out on bail in a multi-crore Delhi Liquor Excise Policy scam, had earlier written to the Prime Minister requesting a subsidy in the fare for students in the Delhi metro. Apparently, ahead of Delhi elections, Kejriwal’s campaign is just to ask more and more things from the Centre government.

Maha Kumbh 2025: ‘IITian Baba’ expelled from Juna Akhara over allegations of misconduct

On 18th January, Shri Panchdashnam Juna Akhara expelled engineer-turned-saint Abhey Singh, famously known as “IITian Baba.” The decision followed allegations of abusive language by Abhey Singh directed at his Guru, Mahant Someshwar Puri. Singh has also been barred from entering the Akhara’s camp and its surroundings, noted a report in The Times of India.

Disciplinary violation cited as reason for expulsion

Speaking to The Times of India, Mahant Hari Giri, the Chief Patron of Juna Akhara, said that the Akhara emphasises discipline and devotion to one’s Guru as core principles of Sanyas. He stated, “Disrespecting one’s Guru is a betrayal of Sanatan Dharma and the Akhara’s values. Discipline is paramount here, and no one, including Singh, is exempt.”

The disciplinary committee of the Akhara highlighted that Singh used offensive language not only against his Guru but also fellow seers, which is a breach of their strict code. Mahant Hari Giri clarified that Singh would remain expelled until he learns to uphold these principles.

A journey from IIT to sainthood

Abhey Singh was working as an aerospace engineer before he was drawn to sainthood. He is an alumnus of IIT-Bombay and had a lucrative salary in Canada. However, he left his corporate career to pursue spirituality. Singh was born in the Jhajjar district of Haryana. His journey reflects a blend of academic brilliance, professional success, and personal struggles.

Singh gained fame during the Maha Kumbh Mela in Prayagraj, specifically after a viral interview that turned him into a social media sensation. He has over a lakh followers on Instagram but faced criticism over a controversial reel where he referred to his father as “Hiranyakashyap” and his Guru as “Pagal” (mad). His remarks sparked outrage within the Akhara, leading to his expulsion.

Family speaks out on his choices

In another report, the Times of India quoted Karan Grewal, Singh’s father, who is a lawyer in Jhajjar Court. He expressed pride in his son’s academic achievements and hoped he would return to family life. Grewal revealed that Singh’s childhood was marred by trauma from familial conflicts that significantly influenced his spiritual decisions. He said, “He was extraordinary in academics but always inclined towards spirituality.” He added that Singh’s decision to forgo marriage was shaped by witnessing parental discord.

Singh’s mother has urged him to return home, but ‘IITian Baba’ has reportedly declined, citing his commitment to the path of Sanyas. Grewal admitted that while he wishes for his son’s homecoming, he respects his choice to pursue a simpler, more peaceful life.

Singh’s presence at the Maha Kumbh Mela made him a topic of intrigue and debate. His story of renouncing wealth and success resonated with many, but his recent actions have raised questions about the integrity required in monastic life.

Mewat: Locals forced to dress girls in boys’ clothes to hide their identity as crimes against women rise in the Islamists dominated area

People living in the Mewat region of Nuh, a Muslim-majority district in Haryana, are being forced to hide women and even girls. A ground report of Dainik Bhaskar exposes the ground situation in Mewat where rising cases of sexual crimes against women and girls are forcing people to hide women in their families.

As per the report, it is common for people in Mewat to cross-dress girls as boys to protect them from becoming ‘targets’. In the report, two women journalists from Dainik Bhaskar narrated their experience of travelling through villages in Mewat. “It is 7 PM. We are in Alwar of Mewat region where rape cases are on the rise. We explored dozens of villages in the Ramgarh police station area. There is a strange sense of fear and discomfort in this area”, the journalists write.

Girls under 4 years dressed as boys in Mewat

On the way from Viratnagar to Sariska, the journalists saw a home where the clothes of children were hung outside for drying. Upon asking, the old woman in the house told them that she has four granddaughters between the ages of 1 to 4 years, but she dresses them in boys’ clothes so that no one can find out that they are girls. The journalists found a similar situation in the Tijara region.

Moving through the market on their way to Thanagazi, the journalists noticed that there were hardly any shops for women’s wear. The people in the market were mostly men. “Among the shops for men’s clothes and shoes, we could find a saree shop but the customers at that shop were all men”, the journalists observed.

They also came across a group of women. All of them were covered head to toe with only their eyes visible. They were waiting for an auto with passengers as they feared sitting in an auto by themselves.

Windows of houses were covered to block any view from outside

Next, the journalists went to Mandari village where they witnessed a similar environment. Several cases of the POCSO Act (Prevention of Children against Sexual Offences Act) were reported in the village. Women had covered their faces, even those sitting right at the gates of their houses. The windows in the houses were covered to block the view from outside. In the houses there, the clothes of men were hanging outside for drying but the women’s clothes were hung inside to avoid being noticed. The women in the area have reportedly modified their lifestyle to keep themselves safe amid the crumbling law and order situation. An advocate Ashok Sharma told the journalists that even girls as young as 5 are not safe in the region as they are easy targets.

Dr. Ravi Mathur, a retired senior medical officer, informed the journalists that he used to handle hundreds of cases of rape in a year. Even animals were apparently subjected to bestiality. “I have seen over 70 cases registered under the POCSO Act in the last few months. The situation will change only when we sensitize boys”, said Deputy SP Dr. Poonam Chauhan, in charge of the Special Investigation Unit for Crimes against Women.

Men guard the gates of houses at night

Locals in Maliwas village in Tulera told the journalists that several girls in the village were married off as young as 14 due to fear for their safety. The gravity of the situation can be inferred from the fact that fathers and brothers in the families guard the gates of houses at night. According to village Sarpanch Babbal Yadav, the teachers in the schools have been directed to inform the family immediately if a child is not present in the class.

Locals warned journalists not to walk alone

When the journalists headed into the interiors of Ramgarh, Naugawan, Bagar Tiraha and M.I.A. (Matsya Industrial Area) in Alwar after finding out about the high number of rape cases there, the locals warned them against going there after dark. The region has a scarcity of water due to which women have to walk for 2 km to fetch water risking their safety.

Nuh district in Mewat has always been a communally sensitive region. In July 2023, a mob of hundreds of Islamist rioters attacked Hindu devotees participating in the Brijmandal Jalabhishek Yatra in Nuh, Mewat, of Haryana. At least six people were killed as a result of the riots. In the wake of the attack on the violence, Home Minister Amit Shah had assured about the establishment of a special and permanent camp for the Rapid Action Force (RAF) in the communally sensitive Muslim-majority district of Mewat in Haryana.

Rahul Gandhi dubs 2023 Bihar caste census ‘fake’, creates trouble for both Congress and RJD which conducted the survey

On Saturday (18th January), Congress MP and Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, termed the caste census conducted in Bihar in 2023 as fake.

His statement, ahead of the Bihar Assembly Elections, has raised questions about its implications for Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader and former Bihar Deputy Chief Minister Tejashwi Yadav, who had previously taken credit for the exercise.

Tejashwi’s claims under scrutiny

The caste survey report was released on 2nd October 2023. It was conducted under the Mahagathbandhan government led by Chief Minister Nitish Kumar, whose party, Janata Dal (United), was leading the alliance comprising JD(U), Congress, and RJD. At that time, Tejashwi had credited himself for pressuring Nitish into carrying out the survey and presented it as a major achievement of his party.

Subsequently, on 9th November 2023, the Bihar Reservation (Amendment) Act, 2023, was passed in the state assembly. The Act effectively expanded the reservation quota from 50% to 65% in the state. Tejashwi claimed credit for that too and positioned himself as a champion of backward and marginalised communities in the state.

However, the expanded quota was struck down by the Patna High Court, stating it was unconstitutional. The decision prompted the Bihar government and RJD to challenge the verdict in the Supreme Court which refused to stay High Court’s judgment but issued notices. The matter is still pending in the apex court.

Rahul Gandhi’s ‘self-goal’

Rahul Gandhi made the remarks at the ‘Samvidhan Suraksha Sammelan’ (Constitution Protection Conference) in Patna. In his statement, Gandhi said, “Caste census should be conducted to understand the true situation of the nation. It will not be like the fake caste census that has been conducted in Bihar…A policy should be made based on the caste census…Congress will pass the caste census in the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. We will demolish the barrier of 50% reservations…”

The remarks, which should be considered a “self-goal” for the Congress scion, have triggered a political storm. Gandhi has inadvertently cast doubt on the claims laid by Tejashwi Yadav, given that the RJD was part of the government when the survey was conducted. The statement also questions the Congress party’s own endorsement of the survey at the time.

The timing of Rahul Gandhi’s comment, with assembly elections in Bihar on the horizon, could damage both the Congress and the Mahagathbandhan.

BJP and JDU leaders come in support of Nitish Kumar

Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has come in support of Nitish Kumar. State President Dilip Jaiswal said, “I don’t know what Rahul Gandhi says, nor do I know how developed his mind is. But what I do know is that Bihar’s Chief Minister Nitish Kumar successfully completed the caste-based census…”

JD(U) leader Rajiv Ranjan Prasad said, ” In the 20 years tenure of Nitish Kumar, caste census is one of the important decisions he has taken. Based on this caste census, economically backwards 94 lakh families in Bihar are being given financial assistance up to Rs 2 lakhs…Rahul Gandhi should also speak about their (Congress) tenure of 55 years, what they did for reservation, what they did regarding caste census…”

JD(U) leader and Bihar minister Ashok Choudhary said, “Rahul Gandhi’s statement on caste-based census has raised eyebrows, as it marks a significant shift in Congress’s approach. Historically, the party had not issued any official stance on the issue of caste-based enumeration…”

Confusion within the Mahagathbandhan

As of now, Gandhi’s statement has created an atmosphere of confusion within the alliance. The RJD is hoping to highlight the caste survey as a key accomplishment to woo backward and Dalit voters. However, as Congress has rejected the report as fake, it could weaken the coalition’s position.

Furthermore, with such remarks, there is a possibility that a deeper divide will be created between the RJD and Congress in the coming months, breaking the alliance completely in a state where caste-based politics dominate the electoral narrative.

35 years since the exodus: Kashmiri Hindus’ wait for justice continues decades later

It has been 35 years since the Kashmiri Hindus were forced to leave Kashmir by the Jihadis. The exodus, a dark chapter in Indian history, was marked by violence, fear, and forced migration. Despite the lapse of time, the victims are still waiting for justice, and the community continues to face resistance to resettlement efforts because of threat from Islamists, terrorism, and other factors.

The events of 1990 were not sudden, though the way history has been written, they may appear so. The seeds of the ethnic cleansing of Kashmiri Hindus were sown long before the fateful January of 1990. The forced exodus was the culmination of a longstanding intention to purge the Valley of its Hindu population, planned and executed by radical Islamic elements. The terrifying slogan, “Raliv, Galiv ya Chaaliv” (convert, leave, or perish), echoed in the Valley’s air for years to drive out Kashmiri Hindus.

The long shadow of history

The persecution of Kashmiri Hindus is not a modern phenomenon. The Valley, once thriving with Hindu civilisation, faced waves of attacks from the 14th century onward. During the Sikh-Dogra rule from 1819 to 1930, there was some relief for the Hindus. However, by the 1930s, radical Islamic influences re-emerged. The anti-Hindu sentiment was fueled by figures such as Sheikh Abdullah and Abdul Qadir. The first recorded evidence of a violent Islamist uprising occurred on 13th July 1931, marked by the infamous slogan demanding the conversion or expulsion of Hindus from the Valley. What began as riots turned into organised killings, rapes, and forced conversions.

The situation worsened in 1947 when Pakistani forces and tribal militias attacked Kashmir during the India-Pakistan Partition. It is believed that around 11,000 to 14,000 Hindus were brutally murdered in Baramulla and Muzaffarabad. There were widespread atrocities, including the looting of homes, rapes, and the abduction of women. Despite the intervention of Indian forces, the trauma inflicted on Hindus and Sikhs left an indelible scar.

Rise of militancy in modern Kashmir

In the following decades, Kashmir witnessed periodic episodes of violence. The foundation for the modern crisis of the 1990s was laid in 1987 with the most rigged elections in Indian history. Farooq Abdullah’s government, in collaboration with the Congress, crushed the pro-Pakistan Muslim United Front (MUF) electorally but allowed them space to foment unrest. By 1988, militancy escalated in the Valley. Bomb blasts, targeted killings, and calls for the imposition of Sharia law became “normal” in Kashmir.

The period between July and December 1989 saw a sharp rise in terror activities. Posters started appearing on the doors of Hindu homes, threatening the residents to leave. The killings began with chilling precision.

March 14, 1989: Prabhavati from Budgam district was killed at Hari Singh High Street, Srinagar, J&K.

September 14, 1989: A top-rated lawyer and social and political activist, Tikka Lal Taploo, was gunned down by the JKLF killers in Habba Kadal, Srinagar.

October 4, 1989: An ex-Sessions Judge Nila Kanth Ganjoo, who emerged as a detestable Kafir when he ordered the execution of the dreaded Maqbool Butt, and based on the evidence deposed, that was later also upheld by the Apex Court.

October 31, 1989: Sheela Koul (Tiku), a housewife, was gunned down by JKLF terrorists at Shivapora, Srinagar. When the ambulance failed to arrive, she was carried to the hospital on a folding bed, where she was left unattended.

December 1, 1989: Ajay Kapoor was in his locality where he was showered with a volley of bullets in cold blood by the JKLF butchers.

December 27, 1989: 57-year-old prominent lawyer Prem Nath Bhatt of Anantnag returned to his home when the Muslim terrorists pumped bullets straight into his head in full public view.

As these killings unfolded, the Farooq Abdullah government abdicated its responsibilities and the CM reportedly fled to London on 18th January 1990. The Valley was left to the mercy of jihadis. On 19th January 1990, Kashmiri Hindus faced their darkest hour. The streets of the Valley echoed with slogans from mosque loudspeakers. Hindus were threatened with death or conversion. Thousands of Hindus fled, terror-stricken, with no choice but to leave their ancestral homes.

A genocide ignored

The exodus, which saw over 300,000 Hindus leave their ancestral homes, was largely ignored by the Indian media and political class. Reports of the genocide were relegated to obscure corners of newspapers, with no significant national outrage. The Rajiv Gandhi government at the Centre and the Farooq Abdullah government in the state failed to act on the calls for help from Hindus, leading to the systematic cleansing of Kashmiri Hindus.

By the end of 1990, over 300 government employees and security personnel were killed by militants. Subsequent massacres in Wandhama, Chapnari, and Doda only reinforced the pattern of terror against Hindus. The ideological campaign of “Islamisation” sought to erase the Valley’s Hindu heritage as temples were destroyed and religious practices suppressed.

The chilling details of the brutal murder of Girija Tickoo echo in the minds of every Hindu who has heard or read about it. Tickoo, who was gang-raped and cut into half using a mechanical saw while alive, still awaits justice. Many Hindu souls like Tickoo are still waiting to see the day when Hindus return to the Valley and reclaim what was theirs.

Justice delayed, hope denied

Three and a half decades later, the Kashmiri Pandit community (Kashmiri Hindus) still awaits justice. The Modi Government has made some promising efforts to bring back Hindus to the Valley. However, these efforts to resettle them in the Valley have been met with resistance, and there is little progress on prosecuting the perpetrators of the genocide. Meanwhile, the community has displayed remarkable resilience, narrating their plight through debates and discussions without resorting to hate or violence.

As India reflects on the 35th anniversary of the exodus, one question continues to haunt: why are Kashmiri Hindus still waiting for justice?

Allahabad High Court Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav gets hounded by leftists after he supported UCC at a VHP event

0

Thirteen Senior Advocates of the Supreme Court, including Indira Jaising and her husband Anand Grover, wrote to the Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna on January 17 urging him to take suo moto notice of remarks made by Allahabad High Court Judge Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav. They also asked the esteemed Judge to direct the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to file an FIR against Yadav

As per reports, the letter sent through the Secretary General of the Supreme Court was also forwarded to other senior judges of the Supreme Court including Justices BR Gavai, Surya Kant, Hrishikesh Roy and AS Oka. The letter was signed by Senior Advocates Indira Jaising, Aspi Chinoy, Navroz Seervai, Anand Grover, Chander Uday Singh, Jaideep Gupta, Mohan V Katarki, Shoeb Alam, R Vaigai, Mihir Desai and Jayant Bhushan.

“Take suo moto notice of the aforesaid speech and in view of the seriousness of the issue, direct the CBI to lodge an FIR against Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav in accordance with the law laid down in K Veeraswami”, the letter read.

In the K Veeraswami case decided by the Apex Court in 1991, it was laid down that no criminal case can be registered against a High Court judge, Chief Justice of a High Court or a Supreme Court judge, without prior consultation with the CJI.

The letter declared the remarks made by Justice Yadav as ‘hate speech’. “Ostensibly, Justice Yadav was commenting on the Uniform Civil Code, but the entire speech seemed like a cover for spreading hate speech on a platform. There was nothing academic, legal or juristic about the contents of the speech”, the letter claimed.

What is the entire controversy

Speaking at an event organised by the legal cell of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) in Prayagraj, on December 8, 2024, Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav supported the Uniform Civil Code and urged the Muslims to embrace the positive change like how Hindus did when the Hindu personal law was reformed. He gave examples of how the Hindus accepted the reforms brought in to address the issues relating to untouchability, female foeticide, sati and so on. However, his remarks were construed as creating an ‘us’ versus ‘them’ narrative and promoting ‘majoritarianism’.

“You have a misconception that if a law (UCC) is brought in, it will be against your Shariat, your Islam and your Quran”, Justice Yadav reportedly said. “But I want to say one thing…whether it’s your personal law, our Hindu law, your Quran or whether it is our Gita, as I have said, we have addressed the ills in our practices…”kamiyan thi, durust kar liye hain” (the shortcomings have been addressed)…untouchability…sati, jauhar…female foeticide…We have addressed all those issues…Then why are you not doing away with this law…that while your first wife is there…you can have three wives…without her consent…This is not acceptable”, he added.

Justice Yadav further said that the majority of people in the Muslim community do not support customs like polygamy and female foeticide. “It is the orthodox Muslims who are harming the country by misguiding others”, he said. Supporting the Uniform Civil Code, Justice Yadav said that the UCC will not only do away with the ill practices within the personal laws but will also contribute to the nation’s progress.

Earlier, the Allahabad High Court Chief Justice Arun Bhansali sought Justice Yadav’s response after the latter had a meeting with the Collegium headed by the CJI on December 17, 2024. In his response, Justice Yadav stood by his remarks and said that his speech was being distorted by those with vested interests. He asserted that his speech was an expression of thoughts on social issues which is consistent with the values enshrined in the Constitution, and not to create hatred towards any community.

‘Fighting Indian State’: FIR registered against Rahul Gandhi for his controversial remark against Indian state

0

 Rahul Gandhi, the Leader of the Opposition, has landed in trouble over his recent remarks, where he stated that “the BJP and RSS have captured every single institution, and we are now fighting the BJP, the RSS, and the Indian State itself”.

An FIR has been registered against him at the Pan Bazar Police Station in Guwahati.

Rahul Gandhi made the statement on January 15, 2025, during the inauguration of the Congress Party’s new headquarter at Kotla Road in Delhi. The FIR was registered under section 152 and 197(1)d of the BNS for “acts endangering sovereignty unity and integrity of India,” a cognizable and non-bailable office.

The complainant, Monjit Chetia, alleged that Gandhi’s statement crossed the limits of permissible free speech and posed a serious threat to public order and national security.

Chetia claimed that Gandhi’s words were an attempt to delegitimize the authority of the State, creating a dangerous narrative that could provoke unrest and separatist sentiments.

“By declaring that his fight is against the “Indian State itself,” the accused has consciously incited subversive activities and rebellion among the populace. This is an attempt to delegitimize the authority of the State and to portray it as a hostile force, thereby creating a dangerous narrative that could provoke unrest and separatist sentiments,” Chetia said in his complaints according to the FIR.

Chetia also suggested that Gandhi’s remarks were motivated by frustration over repeated electoral failures. As the Leader of Opposition, Gandhi has a responsibility to maintain public confidence in democratic institutions, but instead, he chose to exploit his platform to spread falsehoods and provoke rebellion, endangering the unity and sovereignty of India.

“Having been unable to gain public trust through democratic means, the accused now seeks to incite disaffection against the central government and the Indian State. This behavior is particularly alarming, given his position as the Leader of the Opposition, a role that comes with the responsibility to maintain public confidence in democratic institutions. Instead, the accused has chosen to exploit his platform to spread falsehoods and provoke rebellion, endangering the unity and sovereignty of India,” the complainant said.

Chetia complained that Rahul Gandhi’s remarks represent a direct challenge to the integrity and stability of the Indian State, warranting immediate legal action under Section 152 of the BNS. 

Lallantop attempts to shield Rahul Gandhi over his ‘fight the Indian state’ remark, falsely insinuates that BJP quoted the Congress leader out of context

On Saturday (18th January), ‘journalist‘ Saurabh Dwivedi courted controversy after he tried to shield Congress leader Rahul Gandhi against criticism.

Dwivedi, who is the Founding Editor of The Lallantop, recently conducted an interview with political analyst Rajat Sethi. He claimed that Rahul Gandhi talked about ‘fighting against the BJP, RSS and the Indian government.’

Saurabh Dwivedi alleged that the statement of the Gandhi scion was being ‘falsely’ interpreted by the BJP President JP Nadda as ‘fighting the Indian State.’

“JP Nadda is saying that Rahul Gandhi openly talked about fighting against India. The speech was about fighting the Indian government. BJP is claiming that the Congress leader is fighting against India,” the Lallantop’s founding editor was heard saying.

Saurabh Dwivedi attempted to insinuate that the BJP was deliberately quoting Rahul Gandhi out of context and attributing motives to his statement.

Political analyst Rajat Sethi was quick to correct him. He pointed out, “Saurabh ji, Rahul Gandhi did not say Indian government in his speech but the Indian state. He made the speech in English.”

“There was a slip on his part. He kept on talking against the Indian State. If there is any definition of treason, then, it is speaking against the State. This must have been a slip. But he said that his fight and war is against the Indian State,” Rajat Sethi emphasised.

“What is a State? It is the manifestation of the Indian Constitution. Even the position of the Leader of the Opposition, the one he currently occupies, is also part of the Indian State,” he further added.

Saurabh Dwivedi later conceded that Rajat Sethi was absolutely right. “Yes, Rahul Gandhi did not say Indian government but the Indian State,” he acknowledged.

The Background of the Controversy

On Tuesday (14th January), Congress leader Rahul Gandhi stirred the hornet’s nest by declaring that he was fighting the Indian State itself.

“Do not think we are fighting a fair fight. If you believe we are fighting against a political organization called BJP and RSS, they have captured almost every institution in our country. We are now fighting not just the BJP and RSS, but the Indian state itself,” he said.

Rahul Gandhi made the contentious remarks while addressing the party members on the occasion of the inauguration of the new AICC HQ in New Delhi.

Bangladesh’s embankment construction at Indo-Bangladesh border in Tripura raises concerns over flood risks, and is also Indira-Mujib treaty violation

Tensions along the Indo-Bangladesh border do not seem to be subsiding shortly as Bangladesh is now constructing a permanent river embankment at zero point along the border in Tripura. The construction is reportedly taking place between the Moulvibazar district in Bangladesh and the Kailashahar sub-division in Unakoti district in Tripura. Unakoti District Magistrate, Dilip Kumar Chakma, along with other senior officials inspected the site on Friday, January 17.

DM Chakma informed the media that Bangladesh’s move to raise the height of the embankment could endanger the Kailashahar region in Tripura with flood water. “They (Bangladesh) are building an embankment for the protection from floods. We visited the border area to take stock of it. We thought they have substantially raised the height of their embankment”, said Chakma. “We will be required to strengthen our existing embankment as water will flow towards us more now. The matter has to be dealt with at a higher level”, he added.

The DM further informed that the Indian embankment is located around 350 yards from the zero point. “We have no idea about the length of the embankment, roughly around 1 km of it is visible. Work is still in progress. We learnt that they are preparing to make it pucca. I feel India should take necessary steps”, Chakma said. The state government is likely to take up the matter before the central government after receiving a report from the DM.

The embankment violates the Indira-Mujib Treaty

The embankment might worsen the situation during a flood as river Manu flows between the two districts. Bangladesh, which vehemently opposed India’s efforts to set up a fence along the Indo-Bangladesh to counter the problem of growing infiltration, did not reportedly inform India before starting the construction. The construction violates the Indo-Bangladesh Treaty of Friendship, Cooperation and Peace (also known as the Indira-Mujib Treaty, 1972) which prohibits any permanent construction within the zero point. The zero point falls within 150 yards of the border pillars on both sides. No construction is allowed on the zero point except through a mutual agreement.

Saif Ali Khan stabbing case: Mumbai Police arrest Mohammad Shariful Islam Shehzad, a suspected illegal Bangladeshi who was using a false Hindu identity

On 19th January, Mumbai Police arrested a suspected Bangladeshi immigrant named Mohammad Shariful Islam Shehzad in the Saif Ali Khan stabbing case. According to media reports, the accused was detained in Thane after confessing to entering the actor’s home, located in Bandra West, during the early hours of 16th January and carrying out the attack. In an official statement, Mumbai Police said the accused entered India illegally and was using fake Hindu identity.

Speaking to media on Sunday morning, DCP Zone 9 Dixit Gedam said, “On 16th January, at 2 am, actor Saif Ali Khan was attacked at his residence. FIR was registered and one accused has been arrested. His name is Mohammad Shariful Islam Shehzad, he is 30 years old. He entered the house with the intention of robbery. He will be produced in the court and custody will be demanded. Further investigation will take place later… We doubt he is of Bangladeshi origin…”

He added, “Prima facie the accused is a Bangladeshi and after entering India illegally he changed his name. He was using Vijay Das as his current name. He came to Mumbai 5-6 months ago. He stayed in Mumbai for a few days and then in the vicinity of Mumbai. The accused used to work in a housekeeping agency.”

DSP further said, “There is primary evidence to anticipate that the accused is a Bangladeshi. He does not have valid Indian documents. There are some seizures that indicate that he is a Bangladeshi national…”

The 54-year-old Saif was admitted to Lilavati Hospital after sustaining multiple stab wounds, including injuries to his neck and spine, as he confronted the attacker. He underwent emergency surgery and is currently recovering at the hospital. Doctors have confirmed that he is out of danger.

Burglary attempt gone wrong

According to the complaint filed at the police station, the attacker was spotted by a house help as he entered the bedroom of Jehangir, alias Jeh, the younger son of Saif. The house help immediately alerted Saif and Kareena Kapoor Khan, Saif’s wife. The actor confronted the intruder, which led to a scuffle. During the altercation, the actor sustained serious injuries, and a piece of the blade broke off and got lodged in his body, which was later removed during surgery.

Suspect’s background raises questions

The accused was reportedly an employee at a pub located in Thane. The police tracked him to a labour camp near a metro construction site in the Hiranandani Estate. According to the authorities, the accused hails from West Bengal and uses several aliases, including Bijoy Das, Vijay Das, Mohammad Illyas, and BJ. Reports suggest that an investigation into his nationality is also underway to determine if he is an Indian or a Bangladeshi using fake identification.

Nationwide search for accomplices

The arrest of the main accused followed an extensive manhunt that utilised CCTV footage showing the attacker fleeing Saif‘s residence. Posters with his image were distributed across Mumbai and the surrounding areas.

Acting on a tip-off, Mumbai Police coordinated with Chhattisgarh Police and detained a suspect in Durg district, identified as 31-year-old Aakash Kailash Kanojia. He was apprehended aboard the Gyaneshwari Express train by the Railway Protection Force. However, his connection to the case remains unclear.

In another instance, a man detained in Madhya Pradesh on Saturday was initially linked to the stabbing incident, but authorities later clarified that the detention was unrelated.