12 out of 25 Supreme Court judges yet to make their financial assets public

In a news which might raise a few questions about the Indian Judiciary’s commitment to transparency, Economic Times has reported that half of Supreme Court’s judges are yet to make their assets available in the public domain.

8 years ago, the Supreme Court had passed a resolution which called for making the assets of its judges public. But it turns out that till now 12 of the 25 current judges of the Supreme Court are yet to make them public.

As per the resolution, such a disclosure is not mandatory, but reports regularly keep coming out about a lack of it As per the Bar & Bench report, this decision to publicise assets was taken by the court on 26th August 2009 as a result of great pressure from the public and even the judiciary.

- Advertisement - - Article resumes -

This resolution incidentally was in accordance with another resolution dating back to 1997, where the judges were mandated to disclose their assets to the Chief Justice of India.

Now as per the Economic Times report, out of the 12 judges, direct elevations from the bar (that is those who were previously successful lawyers) like RF Nariman, Uday Umesh Lalit and L Nageswar Rao are yet to make their assets public.

The report also claimed that the process itself is not very complete, as for example no information is provided to show the assets of the judge before and after assuming office.

The details of the judges who indeed have declared their assets are available on http://supremecourtofindia.nic.in/assets-judges in the following manner:

As seen from the screen grab, 13 judges have declared the assets, which include the current Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra. This is a sample of his asset declaration [PDF]:

This debate on transparency comes days after the Supreme Court’s decision, to disclose its rationale behind making the collegium recommendations of judicial candidates. This collegium system till now didn’t disclose its rational behind transfers, elevation, appointments, and as a result this process was criticised by members of the legal fraternity for being opaque and arbitrary. In this collegium system, the final decisions are made by the 5 senior most judges headed by the Chief Justice.

Such a decision to make the collegium process more transparent comes about 2 years after the Supreme Court itself struct down the National Judicial Appointments Commission which had sought to inculcate a higher executive role in the whole process.


Share This Post and Support:
We need your support to survive in the media industry. Please consider paying us for the content we produce:

To know more about these payments, please click here.


Most read articles recently

AAP Candidate for Gautam Budh Nagar disqualified

AAP candidate for Gautam Buddh Nagar disqualified for failing to arrange 10 persons to back her nomination

As the AAP is not recognised as a national party by the EC, their candidate has to arrange a minimum of 10 people as proposers at the Returning Officer's office to back her nomination.
Tejaswi Surya attacked for Ayudha Puja

Congress IT cell attacks BJP’s Bangalore South candidate for performing Ayudha Puje as per Hindu rituals

Ayudha Puje is one of the widely celebrated festivals in India which falls during the Navratri

NC Lok Sabha candidate Akbar Lone begins a rally with ‘Pakistan Zindabad’, says will abuse anyone who abuses Pakistan

Akbar Lone, NC Lok Sabha candidate for Baramulla, said that the country across is a Muslim country and abusing Pakistan would mean he is abusing himself

Congress-friendly journalist tries to shield Dynasty, but Rahul Gandhi spoils the party by pulling a Rahul

Even though journalist Pallavi Ghosh sends out feelers to Congress President, he goes ahead and does completely the opposite.
Owner of AAP propaganda blog agitated when Sushma Swaraj stands up for two underage Hindu girls

AAP propaganda site owner gets angry after India expresses concerns over atrocities against Hindus in Pakistan

Sushma Swaraj's move to seek details of the Incident had agitated quite a few people in Pakistan, including their Information and Broadcasting minister Ch Fawad Hussain, who saw it as an intervention in Pakistan's internal matters.

Facebook arbitrarily suspends account of activist Anshul Saxena, fails to restore account despite no wrongdoing

The social media giant, Facebook, has allegedly resorted to arbitrarily suspending the account of social media user Anshul Saxena

Rahul Gandhi’s Minimum Income Guarantee could kill all other subsidies and be the mother of all scams

Remember, India’s worst-case scenario is also the Dynasty’s best case scenario.

Actor R Madhavan offers support to PM Modi to urge voters to cast votes in elections, gets trolled by ‘liberals’

Because of their sheer bitterness for Modi, these cynics are in no mood to spare anyone who comes out in support of Modi

Where is the money? Rahul Gandhi’s promise is going to cost a whopping Rs 3.60 lakh crore a year, 13% of union budget

Minimum Income Guarantee Scheme of Congress party ensures monthly income of Rs 12,000 for 20% of India's population
Malala has maintained a conspicuous silence over atrocities on Hindu girls in her country

Nobel Peace Prize winner Malala’s silence on abduction and forceful conversion of two Hindu girls is deafening

Malala, who often preaches the world about feminist adventures and jumps in to display her intellect over human rights issues especially against women across the world seems to have not found her voice to condemn the bigotry of Pakistanis as she could face severe backlash within her own country.

Latest articles

Connect with us

149,336FansLike
120,885FollowersFollow
31,575SubscribersSubscribe

Don't miss these


Share This Post and Support: