12 out of 25 Supreme Court judges yet to make their financial assets public

In a news which might raise a few questions about the Indian Judiciary’s commitment to transparency, Economic Times has reported that half of Supreme Court’s judges are yet to make their assets available in the public domain.

8 years ago, the Supreme Court had passed a resolution which called for making the assets of its judges public. But it turns out that till now 12 of the 25 current judges of the Supreme Court are yet to make them public.

As per the resolution, such a disclosure is not mandatory, but reports regularly keep coming out about a lack of it As per the Bar & Bench report, this decision to publicise assets was taken by the court on 26th August 2009 as a result of great pressure from the public and even the judiciary.

- Advertisement - - Article resumes -

This resolution incidentally was in accordance with another resolution dating back to 1997, where the judges were mandated to disclose their assets to the Chief Justice of India.

Now as per the Economic Times report, out of the 12 judges, direct elevations from the bar (that is those who were previously successful lawyers) like RF Nariman, Uday Umesh Lalit and L Nageswar Rao are yet to make their assets public.

The report also claimed that the process itself is not very complete, as for example no information is provided to show the assets of the judge before and after assuming office.

The details of the judges who indeed have declared their assets are available on http://supremecourtofindia.nic.in/assets-judges in the following manner:

As seen from the screen grab, 13 judges have declared the assets, which include the current Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra. This is a sample of his asset declaration [PDF]:

This debate on transparency comes days after the Supreme Court’s decision, to disclose its rationale behind making the collegium recommendations of judicial candidates. This collegium system till now didn’t disclose its rational behind transfers, elevation, appointments, and as a result this process was criticised by members of the legal fraternity for being opaque and arbitrary. In this collegium system, the final decisions are made by the 5 senior most judges headed by the Chief Justice.

Such a decision to make the collegium process more transparent comes about 2 years after the Supreme Court itself struct down the National Judicial Appointments Commission which had sought to inculcate a higher executive role in the whole process.

Share and Support:
Support OpIndia by paying for content

Most read articles recently

Activist opposing Akshaya Patra’s mid-day meal contract thinks ‘Brahmins obstruct India’s development’

The Akshaya Patra has come under criticism recently for not including onion and garlic in its mid-day meals for school children.

Mumbai Police teaches a lesson in humility to ‘special’ Sonam Kapoor

Actor Dulquer Salman clarified that he and Sonam were sitting inside a car that was rigged to a truck and hence were not breaking traffic rules.

Uttar Pradesh: Eight cattle smugglers arrested in Bahraich with arms and ammunition

The smugglers even tried to trample the police personnel with their vehicle.

Church of South India Archbishop Dyvasirvadam arrested in church fund scam, reports Times of India

According to the report, archbishop Dyvasirvadam was allegedly involved in misappropriation of church fund for over a decade

Rafale: SC examined the pricing details closely, ‘did not rely’ on CAG report as claimed by Rahul Gandhi

Rahul Gandhi has claimed that the Supreme Court verdict on Rafale was based only on the CAG report, while it is not true

Double whammy for Congress in court: After Rafale verdict, Rakesh Asthana’s appointment as special director gets SC approval

The Supreme Court's verdict is being seen as the second major embarrassment for both the Congress party and Prashant Bhushan, as the Supreme Court had earlier rejected a plea on the issue of a probe concerning the Rafale deal.

Congress friendly journalist wishes death upon BJP Delhi spokesperson Tajinder Bagga

During the run-up to Gujarat assembly elections last year, Trivedi was caught spreading morphed images with Amit Shah's fake quotes on Patidars

Pro-Congress troll resumes fake news website, makes outlandish claims on Rafale targeting Modi

Abhishek Mishra has been associated with the website which spreads fake news and Islamist propaganda
Modi government vindicated, SC says Rafale Deal clean

SC verdict on Rafale deal: Read scathing comments made by Court while dismissing petitions for inquiry

Supreme Court dismissed petitions for an enquiry into Rafale deal pricing, offset partner selection and procurement procedure. Read scathing observations

Rafale: They wanted to pull Modi down to their level

The Congress and its ecosystem is strong and well oiled.

Latest articles

Connect with us

125,686FansLike
98,016FollowersFollow
6,133SubscribersSubscribe

Don't miss these