Times of India repeats the brazen lies of Congress without basic fact checking

In what could be a possible hitjob the ‘Times of India’ indulges in trickery to misguide its readers. An article appears in the backdrop of a fierce twitter batter between BJP Karnataka Twitter ID and Karnataka CM Siddaramaih. The Twitter fight started after Congress President Rahul Gandhi brazenly accused that “BJP government has ‘waived off’ loans worth Rs. 2.5 Lac crores of 15 rich people in the country.”

Aside from the fact that the amount of this lie has been increasing exponentially with every election from 1,10,000 crores in Bhiwandi, to 1,30,000 crores in Gujarat to now, 2,50,000 crores in Karnataka, Rahul Gandhi, the ‘yuva neta’ seemingly doesn’t even know the basic difference between a Write off and a Loan Waiver. Perhaps, this would help.

What is a Write off V/s Loan Waiver?

As per RBI guidelines and the policy approved by Bank Board(s), non performing loans including those where full provisioning has been made in the Bank Balance Sheet on completion of four years, are removed from the Balance Sheet of the bank concerned. This is, inter-alia, done for tax benefits and capital optimization. The borrowers of such loans continue to be liable for repayment. This mere accounting entry is called as “Loan Write off”

- Advertisement - - Article resumes -

In simpler terms Balance Sheet shows the position of asset and liabilities of an entity. Loan given out by a bank is an asset for the bank and liability for the borrower. When the loan becomes a ‘Non Performing asset’ and the bank does not “write off” the same, then asset side of the bank continues to show the wrong position of the state of affairs. Further, the bank will also have to book interest on the loan as an income and even pay Income tax on that amount meanwhile the loan is not being recovered as of that moment. Hence to avoid these issues the loan is ‘written off’ and for all practical purposes, the recovery procedure continues. Loan write off does not mean it is not recovered or that the person liable to repay his loan is let off the hook.

Whereas Loan Waivers are cases where governments pay the amount owed by say farmers on their behalf to the bank. It is pertinent to note that the Banks have no right to waive off any loan. It is the government which decides to pay on behalf of farmers. Banks get the full amount back from the government treasury. Only farmer loans are waived off. No corporate loans have been waived off.

Fake News by Times of India

The Fake news by Times of India begins with the headline itself. It says that Siddaramaiah makes BJP “admit that loans to industrialists were written off”, giving the impression to the reader that somehow, the distortion being peddled by Congress and the muddying of definition between loan waiver and loan write off is true.

The BJP Karnataka handle made a pertinent point differentiating between loan write off and loan waiver. It even mentioned that the loans were “written off” which means that they will be recovered.

This was of course spun all over against by the Chief Minister of Karnataka, Siddaramaiah to conflate the meaning of the two terms and reiterate the lie that farmers loans should be ‘waived off’ just like Industrialists loans have been waived off, implying, that the industrialists don’t have to repay the waived off loan, which we now understand is a lie.

The Times of India article uses this tweet as a basis for their headline saying “Siddaramaiah made BJP admit that loan to industrialists was written off”.

Even though this is fairly clear and established fact, many commentators and politicians alike keep repeating this same lie to every few months to gain political mileage. The Times of India article also plugs tweet by Salman Anees Soz which is a complete distortion.

I had explained this fallacy earlier. For example, for SBI Financial Year 2014-2015, the recovery of written off loans was about 12% and for FY 2015-2016 it was about 14%. This doesn’t mean that the rest of the loans couldn’t be recovered or the banks had stopped trying to recover those loans. Therefore, Salman Soz is wrong and worse, Times of India is way off the mark for taking his lies and distortions as the gospel truth.

While the opposition has turned lying into a habit, one wonders what editorial standards are being followed by Times of India to further such blatant distortions as the gospel truth to its readers. One wonders on whose behest is this being done and how far will the media go with their lies.


Share This Post and Support:
We need your support to survive in the media industry. Please consider paying us for the content we produce:

To know more about these payments, please click here.


Most read articles recently

Pakistan quotes The Quint, Karan Thapar and Praveen Swami to brand Kulbhushan Jadhav as a ‘RAW spy’ at ICJ

Pakistan quoted several articles published in Indian to present its case during Kulbhushan Jadhav hearing at the International Court of Justice
How Ravish Kumar and Vinod Dua misled people about ‘martyr status’ to CRPF jawans after Pulwama attack

How Ravish Kumar and Vinod Dua misled people about ‘martyr status’ to CRPF jawans

Ravish Kumar of NDTV is a man known for many lows. But this may well be his lowest point.
Image Source: The Week

Mandya: Actor-turned-politician Prakash Raj attends funeral of Pulwama martyr, villagers expose his hypocrisy towards Armed Forces

Prakash Raj, a left wing ideologue, who is often known for joining hands with the left-liberals to express their hate towards Hindus and the BJP, has plans to contest in the upcoming elections from Bengaluru Central Lok Sabha constituency.

The Hindu not only cropped the Rafale dissent note, but also had digitally manipulated it

Comparison of Hindu document with ANI document shows that Hindu had doctored the Rafale dissent note

Kavita Krishnan uses 4 year old photograph to claim PM Narendra Modi was laughing after Pulwama attack

Using a old photo, Kavita Krishna claimed the Modi was having fun at election rallies after Pulwama attack

Imran Khan’s deranged statement on Pulwama terror attack tailor-made to appeal to Indian ‘liberal’ sensibilities

In his statement on the Pulwama terror attack, Imran Khan claimed that his country had nothing to gain from attacking India. Apart from that, he threatened India with retaliation should the Indian Army decide to attack Pakistan.

Pakistan minister says ‘bells won’t toll in temples’, he forgets, India is the land of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj

Sheikh Rashid Ahmad, Federal Minister for Pakistani Railways, commented that should anyone look at Pakistan in a negative manner, then "the eyes will be ripped out, the grass will not grow, the birds will not chirp and the bells won't toll in Temples."
Image Source: Swarajya

Ten things India must do to stop being a soft state

India is overly defensive. Despite its massive economic and military power, it does not respond to grave provocations (26/11, for example). It does not retaliate when attacked. It tolerates countless attacks on its citizens and affronts to its prestige.
Article 370

Article 370 must go: BJP can’t pussyfoot any longer

So what is this Article 370 which allows J&K to function much against the national (or for that matter, it’s own) interests?
Amar Singh donates property worth Rs 15 crore to RSS-affiliated Seva Bharti.

Amar Singh donates ancestral properties worth 15 crores to RSS-affiliated organisation Seva Bharti

Amar Singh donated Rs 15 crore property to Seva Bharti, an RSS affiliated social service organisation.

Latest articles

Connect with us

137,650FansLike
110,691FollowersFollow
23,232SubscribersSubscribe

Don't miss these