This is what I learnt from the ‘inter-faith couple’ passport drama – don’t show your nikahnama when it’s not needed

Yesterday, media was abuzz with the news that a couple in Lucknow was allegedly moral policed by passport officer in Lucknow, one Vikas Mishra, who allegedly harassed an interfaith couple. In her tweets to Minister of External Affairs, Sushma Swaraj, one Tanvi Anas accused Mishra of speaking to her rudely and holding her and her Muslim husband’s passports on hold for not having changed her name after marriage.

She claimed that she has married a Muslim but has never changed her name. In subsequent tweets, she explains her ordeal to Swaraj how it is her personal choice not to change her name after marriage.

She accused that Mishra asked her to change her name after marriage as it is ‘her duty’.

- Advertisement - - Article resumes -

However, after a huge social media uproar, Vikas Mishra, the passport office officer in question has defended himself claiming that Tanvi’s name as per nikahnama (Islamic marriage contract) was ‘Shadia Anas’, but she refused to get her name changed as per her nikahnama.

If the marriage is solemnised as per Islamic rituals, i.e. a nikahnama was drawn, instead of marriage under Special Marriage Act, Tanvi would have to convert to Islam. This would mean two things:

  1. This ceases to be inter-faith marriage.
  2. It raises the question on whether she changed her name to Shadia Anas as per her nikahnama?

Mishra, who is now transferred following Tanvi’s accusations that he asked her husband to convert to Hinduism, has claimed that he merely asked Tanvi to clarify whether she has ever changed her name. There is a column in the passport application form which requires you to fill in this detail. He claimed that the couple had gone from Noida to Lucknow, instead of going to the Ghaziabad passport office, to get the passport done on a short leave and got agitated when he raised an objection.

To this, Tanvi claimed that more than what Mishra said, she had a problem with the ‘tone’ he used.

Tanvi Anas tweets which she has now deleted.

Like everyone else, I got a little curious and did a bit of digging.

The passport declaration form [PDF] has a declaration that to the best of applicant’s knowledge, all information provided is true and correct. She has to mention her marital status in the form. If she has changed her name, she has to mention that as well.

Tanvi claims that she did not change her legal name to be the same as the name mentioned in the nikahnama because it is her personal choice. And that is true, indeed. However, the nikahnama is a valid marriage certificate as per Islam and even Indian laws (personal laws) and if the nikahnama has a different name, she is required to mention that. Hence, if there is a discrepancy between the name mentioned in the nikahnama and her legal name, the officer is well within his right to ask her to clarify and justify the discrepancy.

Interestingly, Modi government has relaxed the rules so much that woman need not provide marriage certificate for issuance of a passport. The standard affidavit which is required to be filed by a person who needs to get his/her spouse’s name added or marital status changed, does not need to submit any additional documents like a marriage certificate.

Annexure E for a standard affidavit for change of name. 

Tomorrow I could get my name changed on passport and in name of spouse I could also write Salman Khan and I don’t even need a proof for that. Of course, that doesn’t mean I would get away with it considering there are strict rules and any incorrect information provided in the passport is a punishable offence, but nothing really stops anyone from providing incorrect information in the first place.

Anyway, coming back to this curious case, we have more questions.

  1. Why did Tanvi and her husband go from Noida to Lucknow for a passport when they were required to file same in Ghaziabad?
  2. Did she and her husband mention their marital status in their passport application form?
  3. When it was not required by law, why did they provide the nikahnama, especially when the nikahnama had a different name than her legal name?
  4. If an officer raises a question when there is a difference in names provided, the query does seem valid.
  5. Did they get their passports on such short notice without police verification because of the tweet?
  6. Now that they both have received their passports, within hours of tweeting to Sushma Swaraj, will there be a detailed police verification, as required by law for normal citizens who don’t get passports by tweeting to the minister get theirs?

Perhaps I should tweet this to Sushma Swaraj for a quicker response.


Share This Post and Support:
We need your support to survive in the media industry. Please consider paying us for the content we produce:

To know more about these payments, please click here.


Most read articles recently

Pakistanis get scared about attack by India after seeing their own Air Force fighter jets flying over civilian areas

Several people posted on social media that India has dropped bombs over Sialkot in Pakistan

Congress deletes video where Rahul Gandhi was seen dancing shortly after the Pulwama attack

After Congress' lies against the Prime Minister were exposed, Congress proceeded to delete the tweet where Rahul Gandhi was seen dancing after the Pulwama terror attack.
Locals even pelted stones at injured jawans

Pulwama attack: Women, children in Kashmir ferried expensive military grade RDX in small quantities for months

The trigger for the explosive was manufactured locally and that ammonium nitrate was used as an oxidizer in the RDX explosive. The military grade RDX was obtained from Pakistan and the device was assembled around 10 km from the blast site.

This is why Neena Gupta wants no one to wish Pritish Nandy even a Happy Birthday

Pritish Nandy 'stole' Masaba's birth certificate and printed in his magazine without Neena Gupta's permission
Image Source: Twitter

Fearing India’s retaliation, Pakistan cancels leaves of its troops, uses flares to light up night sky to see movement of Indian troops

Pakistani administration has asked people to stay in underground bunkers, which could protect them from shelling or any form of attacks which could come from the other side of the border.
Pakistan's government acts as a subordinate of its military and Islamic fundamentalists

It appears Pakistan is scared of India: Masood Azhar’s veiled threat to Imran Khan against any govt action

Masood Azhar said in his weekly address, ''Pakistan's response to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's threats post Pulwama was rather lukewarm and lacklustre. It appears Pakistan is scared of India.''

After Ajaz Ashraf of Caravan reduced martyrs to their caste, he shouldn’t play victim when he is reduced to his religion

In his report, Ajaz Ashraf says quite clearly that he called the martyrs of the family to in their moment of unimaginable tragedy to inquire about their caste.

Waters of 3 rivers flowing into Pakistan will be diverted to Yamuna as per Indus Water Treaty: Nitin Gadkari

Nitin Gadkari had said that dams and other developmental projects are being conceptualised on the 3 rivers will choke Pakistan’s water supply

Congress workers used to do booth capturing for me and my father when there was no EVM : Congress leader Kirti Azad

Kirti Azad was suspended from the Bharatiya Janata Party in 2015 after he accused senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley of Corruption.
Image Source: The Week

Mandya: Actor-turned-politician Prakash Raj attends funeral of Pulwama martyr, villagers expose his hypocrisy towards Armed Forces

Prakash Raj, a left wing ideologue, who is often known for joining hands with the left-liberals to express their hate towards Hindus and the BJP, has plans to contest in the upcoming elections from Bengaluru Central Lok Sabha constituency.

Latest articles

Connect with us

138,583FansLike
111,458FollowersFollow
23,553SubscribersSubscribe

Don't miss these