HomeNews ReportsRajdeep Sardesai falsely claims that Modi govt approves projects only before elections in states,...

Rajdeep Sardesai falsely claims that Modi govt approves projects only before elections in states, asks some silly questions: A fact check

Data shows that the govt has been approving mega infra projects every month across India regardless of the ruling party in the states.

On 11th September, Journalist Rajdeep Sardesai made a serious allegation against the Narendra Modi government, accusing it of approving major infrastructure projects for electoral benefit. Referring to a Railway doubling project and an Expressway project going through Bihar, in a post on ?, Sardesai alleged that the project has been approved just before the state’s assembly elections.

Notably, the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs yesterday approved two major infrastructure projects totalling ₹7,616 crore. One is doubling of Bhagalpur – Dumka – Rampurhat single railway line section in Bihar, Jharkhand and West Bengal totalling 177 km with total cost of ₹3,169 Crore, and the other is 4-lane greenfield access-controlled 82.4 km Mokama-Munger section of the Buxar-Bhagalpur High-Speed Corridor in Bihar with an outlay of ₹4447.38 Crore. As mentioned, the railway track doubling project goes through 3 states including Bihar, while the access-controlled highway project lies within Bihar.

Alleging that both projects have been approved only due to upcoming Bihar assembly elections, Rajdeep Sardesai posed 5 questions – why are mega projects for states unveiled only at election time, is there any rigorous audit on how the money is actually spent, are the rules different for Centre and opposition ruled states, what would happen if we had one nation, one election, is it fair to say that one party’s freebies/ ‘revadi’ is another party’s welfare/development bonanza.

Rajdeep Sardesai has posed these questions based on completely false and baseless claims, because it is completely wrong to allege that the Modi govt approves mega projects only at election time. NDA government’s push for infrastructure is well known, and at almost every cabinet meeting, such mega projects are regularly approved. In the last few months, the government has approved several such projects across in India. Such projects cover states ruled by both NDA and non-NDA parties, and states where no elections are due recently.

Here are some such big projects announced in recent months:

DateProjectStatesAmount
27 August 2025Railway multi tracking projectsKarnataka, Telangana, Bihar, Assam₹12,328 Crore
27 August 2025New railway line projectGujarat₹2,526 Crore
19 August 2025Green Field Airport at Kota-BundiRajasthan ₹1,507.00 Crore
19 August 20256-lane access-controlled Capital Region Ring RoadOdisha₹8,307.74 Crore
12 August 2025700 MW Tato-II Hydro Electric Project Arunachal Pradesh₹8,146.21 Crore
8 August 20254-lane Marakkanam – Puducherry RoadTamil Nadu ₹2,157 Crore
31 July 2025Railway multi tracking projectsMaharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, West Bengal, Bihar, Odisha, and Jharkhand ₹11,169 Crore
1 July 20254-Lane Paramakudi – Ramanathapuram RoadTamil Nadu ₹1,853 Crore
11 June 2025Railway multi tracking projectsJharkhand, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh₹6,405 Crore
28 May 2025Railway multi tracking projectsMaharashtra and Madhya Pradesh₹3,399 Crore
28 May 20254-Lane Badvel- Nellore Highway Andhra Pradesh₹3,653.10 Crore
30 April 2025Greenfield High-Speed CorridorMeghalaya and Assam₹22,864 Crore
9 April 20256 lane access controlled Zirakpur BypassPunjab and Haryana ₹1,878.31 Crore
9 April 2025Railway multi tracking projectsAndhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu₹1,332 Crore
4 April 2025Railway multi tracking projectsMaharashtra, Odisha, and Chhattisgarh₹18,658 Crore
28 March 20254-Lane Highway project  Bihar₹3,712.40 Crore
28 March 2025Kosi Mechi Intra-State Link ProjectBihar₹6,282.32 Crore
19 March 20256- lane access controlled Greenfield HighwayMaharashtra ₹4,500.62 Crore
5 March 2025Govindghat to Hemkund Ropeway project Uttarakhand₹2,730.13 Crore
5 March 2025Sonprayag to Kedarnath Ropeway projectUttarakhand₹4,081.28 Crore
Total  ₹66,039.06 Crore

The above table clearly shows how Rajdeep Sardesai is lying to make fake allegations against the union government. In the last six months, the govt has approved several similar infrastructure projects every month. Yesterday’s approval of two projects was just part of such regular approvals.

Moreover, a look at the states in the table shows how Rajdeep Sardesai’s claim of approving elections only before elections and discrimination against opposition states is also completely wrong. Major projects have been approved in states where there are no assembly elections scheduled, and several projects have been approved in non-NDA ruled states, like Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, West Bengal, Punjab, Meghalaya etc.

Now, here are the answers to Rajdeep Sardesai’s questions

1) Why are mega projects for states unveiled only at election time?

Ans. Wrong claim, mega projects for states are unveiled all the time, not only at election time, as seen above.

2) Is there any rigorous audit on how the money (obtained from us taxpayers) is actually spent?

Ans. This is a silly question coming from a veteran journalist. CAG audits all the spendings of the government, including infrastructure projects. Railways, NHAI and other relevant implementing organisations have their own internal audits.

Moreover, not all of these projects are entirely govt funded, many projects include financial contribution from the private sector.

3) Are the rules different for Centre and opposition ruled states? Discriminatory federalism underlying ‘double engine’ politics?

Ans. The above list shows this is another false claim. Several big infrastructure projects are in non-NDA ruled states. Road and Railway projects span multiple states and it is not even possible to construct them on based of the ruling party.

Note: The term ‘Opposition-ruled’ used by Rajdeep Sardesai is an oxymoron, because opposition means not in the government, there can’t be any ‘opposition-ruled government’, he most probably wanted to mean ‘non-NDA ruled’.

 4) What would happen if we had one nation, one election?

Ans. Rhetorical question with no link with the subject. Also, it is already established that projects are approved without any election.

 5) Is it fair to say that one party’s freebies/ ‘revadi’ is another party’s welfare/development bonanza?

Ans. Another silly question, capital expenditure on infrastructure projects are not freebies or ‘revadi’, they are literally the opposite. Freebies are direct payments to people, while these are capital expenses that will create major infrastructures, generate jobs, and contribute to overall economic development of the places where they are located.

In conclusion, the steady stream of projects approvals in 2025, including in often in states far from polls and ruled by non-NDA parties, proves how Rajdeep Sardesai is shamelessly lying. These projects reflect a commitment of the Modi government to national infrastructure under initiatives like PM Gati Shakti, and have nothing to do with elections or the ruling party of the state.

Join OpIndia's official WhatsApp channel

  Support Us  

For likes of 'The Wire' who consider 'nationalism' a bad word, there is never paucity of funds. They have a well-oiled international ecosystem that keeps their business running. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

Raju Das
Raju Das
Corporate Dropout, Freelance Translator

Related Articles

Trending now

As Bihar DGP bars cops from wearing religious symbols like tilak and mangalsutra with uniform, here are past incidents wherein Hindus were targeted in...

In fact, in 2024, the Madras High Court allowed Muslim police officials to keep beards in Islamic style, citing religious freedom. If Muslim cops can be allowed to sport beards according to their religious beliefs, why can't Hindu officials wear a Tilak or other religious symbols?

As Raghav Chadha and 6 other AAP Rajya MPs defect and merge with BJP, here’s what the Anti-Defection Law is and how AAP’s attempt...

Paragraph 4 (2) essentially kills AAP’s argument that a ‘real’ merger must involve the national party structure and not just one House’s lawmakers. This constitutional provision rejects the interpretation of the Anti-Defection Law, AAP leadership is putting forth.
- Advertisement -