HomeNews ReportsPakistan alleges India wants it to deny consular access to Kulbhushan Jadhav so India...

Pakistan alleges India wants it to deny consular access to Kulbhushan Jadhav so India can use it against Pak in ICJ

In May, the top law officer of Pakistan claimed before the Islamabad High Court that India had rejected the proposal for consular access, citing 'sovereignty' issues.

On Sunday (June 13), Pakistan Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi sparked controversy by claiming that India wanted Pakistan to not provide consular access to Indian citizen Kulbhushan Jadhav. He alleged that India wanted to leverage the lack of consular access to Jadhav in the International Court of Justice (ICJ).

While speaking to the media, Qureshi claimed, “We have taken steps to implement the directive of the International Court of Justice. India wants Pakistan to deny consular access to Kulbhushan Jadhav so that it could have grounds to go to the ICJ. The opposition should not show ignorance by making statements in this regard. It should avoid strengthening the Indian point of view.”

Qureshi had also blamed the previous Nawaz Sharif government for ‘mishandling’ of the Kulbhushan Jadhav case. His contentious comments came at the backdrop of the ICJ (Review and Re-consideration) Bill, 2020 passed by the Pakistani Parliament recently. The law would provide new consular access to the Indian citizen in accordance with the order of the ICJ. After the Bill was approved, the Opposition parties raised slogans of ‘Hang Kulbhushan’, ‘Modi’s friend is a traitor’ in the National Assembly.

In May, the top law officer of Pakistan claimed before the Islamabad High Court that India had rejected the proposal for consular access, citing ‘sovereignty’ issues. The officer alleged that India had said that its sovereignty would be violated if Jadhav stood on trial in a Pakistani court. Qureshi said, “Opposition members will not exhibit a lack of understanding [on the issue] and will be cognisant of Indian’s wicked ways.”

ICJ directed Pakistan to provide consular access to Kulbhushan Jadhav

The International Court of Justice (ICJ), headquartered in Hague in the Netherlands, had in July 2019 directed Pakistan to stay Jadhav’s execution and allow him consular access. Based on ICJ’s verdict in a 15-1 decision on July 17, Pakistan had on July 30 sent its first proposal to India but with 2 riders attached. One that Pakistani security personnel would be present during the meeting and second there would be CCTV cameras present in the room.

After the ICJ verdict stayed the execution and allowed India consular access, India had declared that it would push for shifting Jadhav’s case to a civilian court, to ensure he got proper legal representation. After the consular access was finally granted in September 2019, India has stated that Jadhav was under extreme pressure by Pakistan to parrot a false narrative.

Join OpIndia's official WhatsApp channel

  Support Us  

For likes of 'The Wire' who consider 'nationalism' a bad word, there is never paucity of funds. They have a well-oiled international ecosystem that keeps their business running. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

Searched termskulbhushan jadhav,
OpIndia Staff
OpIndia Staffhttps://www.opindia.com
Staff reporter at OpIndia

Related Articles

Trending now

Accounting fraud, fake revenue and more: Who is Rajesh Mehta and why is his company Rajesh Exports under the scanner of SEBI

While Rajesh Exports came under SEBI scanner in 2024, many analysts and investors have been voicing suspicions about the extraordinarily high revenues, cash balances, and subsidiary opacity. Some even compared the story of Rajesh Exports to the Geetanjali Gems collapse, a major jewellery export scam.

‘First they offer namaz in a temple, then claim it was a mosque’: From Bulandshahr to Bhojshala, examining the Islamist pattern of encroaching Hindu...

From Bulandshahr’s Hanuman temple to Malihabad’s Kans Fort and Dhar’s Bhojshala, the Islamist practice of offering namaz at Hindu religious sites is often the first step in a larger pattern of encroachment, citing historical disputes, legal battles, and documented cases of temple occupation.
- Advertisement -