HomeSportsDjokovic's participation in Australian Open still unsure as threat of deportation persists, Australian minister...

Djokovic’s participation in Australian Open still unsure as threat of deportation persists, Australian minister mulls personally considering his case

Novak Djokovic will be able to defend his Australian Open title, at least for the time being, after Judge Anthony Kelly of the Federal Circuit and Family Court annulled the termination of his visa following an agreement between the tennis star's attorneys and the government.

It is likely that Djokovic’s triumph in the court is a hollow victory, with the government’s counsel indicating that Immigration Minister Alex Hawke would now decide whether to cancel the tennis star’s visa for a second time.

Novak Djokovic will be able to defend his Australian Open title, at least for the time being, after Judge Anthony Kelly of the Federal Circuit and Family Court annulled the termination of his visa following an agreement between the tennis star’s attorneys and the government.

After the hearing, both parties agreed that Djokovic had not been given enough time to reply to the notice of visa cancellation. Border authorities told him he had until 8:30 a.m. on Thursday to react, but his visa was revoked at 7:42 a.m. Kelly ordered Djokovic’s release on these grounds.

However, the government’s counsel soon hinted that Hawke would consider using his personal power to revoke Djokovic’s visa once more.

We should expect further litigation if such a ruling is made. Kelly stated that he expects to be “well informed in advance” if he is called upon in future hearings, noting that “the stakes have grown rather than receded.” Kelly also stated that if the minister’s personal power was used, Djokovic might be prevented from re-entering Australia for three years, however this exclusion term may be lifted.

The Australian government decided to rescind the decision to cancel Novak Djokovic’s visa, which means that the visa he arrived to Australia on would be reinstated, and he will be released from custody and get his passport and other personal things.

The controversy surrounding the nine-time Australian Open winner has captivated the athletic world since Djokovic was stopped upon arrival in Melbourne last week owing to concerns regarding his medical exemption from vaccination to compete in the event, which begins on January 17.

Following the loss of his visa, Djokovic was sent to immigration custody in Melbourne’s renowned Park Hotel. His attorneys subsequently filed a judicial review application to contest the cancellation. For the time being, Djokovic is unrestricted. But it’s unclear if he’ll spend the next few days on a tennis court or in a federal court.

The Australian Open starts on January 17. Djokovic is the current world number 1. If he wins the title, he will be the most successful men’s player in tennis.

Join OpIndia's official WhatsApp channel

  Support Us  

For likes of 'The Wire' who consider 'nationalism' a bad word, there is never paucity of funds. They have a well-oiled international ecosystem that keeps their business running. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

OpIndia Staff
OpIndia Staffhttps://www.opindia.com
Staff reporter at OpIndia

Related Articles

Trending now

‘BJP swallows its allies’: Old accusation is back after Annamalai’s departure, but It’s the allies who backstabbed BJP first

Despite Annamalai leaving the party, it does not prove that BJP abandons its leaders or allies. History shows BJP’s coalition politics has been the strategy of taking allies along.

As Congress and AAP fight to take credit for developing the ‘education sector’ of Punjab, read how Arvind Kejriwal was accused of passing Sheila...

While AAP has claimed credit for Punjab’s rise in the education sector, the timeline suggests the state’s improvement may have begun before the party came to power in 2022. The AAP government was sworn in in March 2022. But some key surveys or studies have cited the data prior to 2022. It raises the question: Does the AAP government deserve the actual credit, or are they riding on someone else's work? 
- Advertisement -