Home Blog Page 2286

Adana massacre of 1909: Long before the 1915 genocide of Armenian Christians, Ottomans had massacred thousands, over a mere rumour

The Armenian Genocide, a series of systemic killings, and organised extermination of the minority population of Christians during the Ottoman Muslim rule in the region of Armenia is one of the most horrific state-sponsored genocidal events of the 20th century.

Usually, the Armenian Genocide refers to a series of massacres of the Armenian Christian population carried out by officials of the Ottoman Empire from 1915 onwards. The genocide began in 1915 and lasted until 1923, killing an estimated 1.5 million Armenian Christians, among other minority Christian groups.

However, years before 1915, a tragic event in Adana in April 1909 displays how the Ottoman Empire was prejudiced against the Christians under their rule and how an entire population was branded the enemy of the state, and subjected to tragic, horrific murder on an enormous scale.

Ottoman Empire’s genocide of the Armenian population: Hamid II’s massacre of Armenians in 1895

The population of Armenian Christians under Ottoman rule in Western Asia has been subjected to multiple events of atrocities and massacres over centuries. In 1895, Ottoman Sultan Abdul Hamid II ordered the killing of the Armenian population after Armenian groups demanded equal rights for minority Christians under the Islamic Ottoman regime.

Beginning in the fall of 1895, Hamid II’s officials and irregular militia started attacking Armenian villages and settlements and killing the general population with impunity. By the spring of 1896, an estimated 300,000 Armenians were killed. Rapes and forced conversions were rampant too. This was the initial stage in what was to be decades of violence and massacres for the Armenian people living under the Ottoman caliphate.

The large-scale violence against the Armenian population was a turning point, marking the beginning of a pattern of violence and persecution that would continue for decades, culminating in the Armenian Genocide of 1915.

The Adana massacre of 1909

Adana massacre covered in a French newspaper, image via @GraecoSyrian on Twitter


The region of Adana (Adana Eyalet) was located in the region of southeastern Anatolia, which was then part of the Ottoman Empire. Around 1909, a rumour started reading that the Armenians living in the region are planning a revolt against the Ottoman Empire. Unlike the Hamiddian massacre, this event was carried forward by local Ottoman officials and Islamic groups, with motives of the social and economic devastation of Armenian and other minority groups.

Adana region in Ottoman Empire, Modern Turkey

The violence began on April 14, 1909, when Muslim mobs began attacking Armenian neighbourhoods in Adana and its surrounding areas, burning homes and businesses, and killing Armenian civilians. The violence quickly spread to other Christian communities, including the Greeks and Assyrians. The Ottoman authorities were either unable or unwilling to stop the violence, and in some cases, even encouraged it.

Over 1300 Assyrians and hundreds of Greeks and Syrian Christians were also killed. Beginning on April 14, Muslim mobs instigated and aided by Islamic clerics and Ottoman officials, started raiding villages and killing anyone and everyone from the minority communities.

Images of devastation and torture in the Adana massacre in 1909, via @ResearchWing and @HistoryfyToday

An estimated 20,000 to 30,000 Armenians and hundreds of Greeks and Assyrians were rounded up, tortured, raped and killed. People were carved with knives and shops and homes were gutted in the fire.

How it was fuelled

The massacre was fuelled by a combination of factors. Religious intolerance against minority Christians, economic competition, and Ottoman government policies all played a role. The Ottoman Empire was in a state of decline, and the rise of fanaticism mixed with ‘nationalist’ sentiments towards the Empire was fuelling hatred against Christians who were perceived as being sympathetic towards the Russian State.

Socio-economic differences between the Muslim Turks and Armenians were also one of the reasons. Though the general Armenian population was not particularly rich, some Armenian Christians had found success. This was used as a trigger to incite the Muslim mobs against the population, branding the Armenians as traitors of the Ottoman Empire because of their religion.

In the months prior to the massacre, rumours began to circulate that Armenians were plotting to take over the Ottoman Empire with the support of European powers. These rumours were spread by Ottoman officials and Muslim leaders, who used them to stoke fears and fuel anti-Armenian sentiment. Even after the April 14 massacres, Ottoman officials and soldiers kept spreading the claims that it was the Armenians who had attacked Muslims.

The Committee of Union and Progress, or CUP, was a political party that emerged in the late 19th century in the Ottoman Empire, on the promise of a centralized and modernized Ottoman state. In the years before 1909, the CUP had gained significant influence in the Ottoman government, with many of its members holding key positions in the Empire. Anti-Armenian sentiment often formed a key rhetoric of the CUP.

It is said that many CUP members were actively and directly involved in the Armenian massacre, some members even helping to fuel the rumours that the Armenians are plotting to overthrow the Ottomans.

After the massacre

The Ottoman Empire, whose officials and soldiers were active and willing perpetrators of large-scale violence against minority Christian groups, never acknowledged their roles. Despite reports of widespread atrocities against Armenian civilians, Ottoman officials never took any decisive action to stop the massacre. As the violence continued unabated and got widely reported, the Ottoman government finally sent troops to stop the violence, but that proved to be futile too. Because they were mostly Ottoman Muslim troops who often participated in the violence against minorities.

A book by Rouben Paul Adalian mentions that a total of 24 churches, 16 schools, 232 houses, 30 hotels, 2 plants, 1429 cottages, 253 farms, 523 shops, 23 mills and many other public buildings were burnt in Adana alone.

Even an investigation carried out by the Ottoman government after the massacre was found to be horribly biased against the Armenians. No meaningful steps were taken to prevent similar incidents in the future and the perpetrators were never brought to justice. Most of the officials involved went unpunished. Hence, the massacre only paved the way for future atrocities at a grander scale against the Armenians, eventually leading to the 1915 genocide that killed millions of them.

The remnants of the hatred and legacy of violence between the two ethnic groups continue even today, in the form of the ongoing conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan, and Turkey’s open support to Azerbaijan against the Armenians.

“Saale kaafir log”, “Kaat daalenge”, FIR in Hanuman Janomtsav violence in Odisha reveals how Muslim mob attacked Hindus when they chanted ‘Jai Shri Ram’

0

In Odisha’s Sambalpur, a bike rally organised by ‘Hanuman Jayanti Samanyoy Samiti’ and Bajrang Dal came under violent stone pelting when it was passing near a masjid in the Dhanupali area, triggering clashes on Wednesday evening, April 12. A look at the FIR filed following the incident reveals how a Muslim mob attacked Hindus during the procession while shouting highly incendiary slogans.

As per the FIR filed by complainant Dhirendra Kumar Swain, who was stationed at Motijharan chowk on the fateful day along with Sub-Inspector Dharmendra Bhoi to maintain law and order during the Hanuman Jayanti procession.

In the procession, about 1000 motorcyclists holding religious flags proceeded towards Goplbazar via Bhutapada Motijharan, Sunapali, Dhankauda . The rally reached near Motijharan chowk at about 6 PM.

Half of the members of the procession crossed Motijharan chowk while the other half of the procession made a halt there for some time. While there, the procession was chanting slogans like ‘Jai Shri Ram’, ‘Jai Bajrang Bali’ and that was when the procession came under attack from around 200 Islamists. They abused the members of the procession and threatened them to vacate the place immediately.

Soon, they started pelting stones at the procession. As per the FIR, the Islamists attacked the members of the rally with iron rods, lathis, and swords, with the intention to kill. During the attack, apart from shouting obscenities, Islamists were shouting ‘kafir log’, ‘sale logo ko kaat denge’, ‘salo ko India wapas nehi jaane denge’, as per the FIR.

Details of the FIR

15 attackers have been named in the FIR along with 150 to 160 other unidentified attackers.

The accused named in the FIR
The accused named in the FIR

Stone pelting on Hanuman Janmotsav procession in Odisha

In Odisha’s Sambalpur, a bike rally organised by ‘Hanuman Jayanti Samanyoy Samiti and Bajrang Dal came under violent stone pelting when it was passing near a masjid in the Dhanupali area, triggering clashes among two groups on Wednesday evening, April 12. As per reports, several police personnel, including the woman IIC of Dhanupali Police Station have been injured in the clashes.

Videos of the incident showed continuous stone pelting near a masjid and adjacent lane. The bikes and scooters used in the rally are seen lying scattered as the stone pelting disrupts the bike rally. Police personnel were seen making futile attempts to prevent the mob from attacking, while abusive words are heard.

As per reports in the Odia media, 10 police personnel, including the ASP of Sambalpur have been injured in the violent clashes. As per reports, 25 people have been detained so far after the violence. Additional police forces were soon deployed to disperse the mob.

‘Will continue work against land jihad, love jihad, I have done nothing wrong’, Kajal Hindustani after coming out of jail

Hindu activist Kajal Hindustani has said that she will continue to work against land jihad, love jihad, and forced conversions. She made these remarks while addressing the media as she stepped out of the Junagadh jail after she was granted bail.

Kajal Hindustani said, “Even after this much I am firm on what I said. This is why I was not afraid and now I am here in front of you. I had trusted that I will definitely get justice. And I got justice and I am here in front of you all.”

Kajal Hindustani further said, “There are many workers who work a lot for Dharma. As people from the other side commit such things, it is our duty to save our faith. I was doing social work against land jihad, love jihad, and forced conversions. I still do that and I continue to do that.”

She said that she has full trust in the judiciary and is confident that she will get justice, saying that she has not done anything wrong. “I have not done anything wrong and never gone against the constitution. I believed that I would get justice and I got justice and today I am before you all,” she said.

Appealing people to continue working for the cause, she said, ‘Everyone will do their respective work. We have a religion to protect the way others do their work. That is why I must continue to fight land jihad, love jihad, illegal conversions and not sit at home, the work will continue.’

Many supporters welcomed Kajal Hindustani chanting Jai Shri Ram slogans as she came out of jail. She was taken to the residence under tight police security. Two police vehicles guarded her car in the front and back as the convoy moved towards her house. On the way to her house, she was welcomed by people who showered flowers and garlands on her.

On 13th April 2023, Hindu activist Kajal Hindustani was granted bail in the Ram Navami speech case in Una. She was released on a bond of Rs 50,000. She came out of Junagadh jail after five days.

On Sunday, April 9, Hindu activist Kajal Hindustani was arrested by Gujarat’s Una police. This came after a case was registered against her for an alleged ‘hate speech’. 

On March 30, the Ram Navami procession (Shobhayatra) was taken out in Una of district Gir Somnath, Gujarat. Following the procession, an event was organized where Hindu activist Kajal Hindustani was one of the speakers. The Dharmasabha took place at Raavanvadi near Trikon Bagh.

During her speech, Kajal Hindustani raised several issues, including Love Jihad and Land Jihad. The local Muslims deemed her speech controversial and took the entire city hostage. There were reports of stone pelting at various places, and the city was on the edge for two days. In addition to this, the infamous Sar Tan Se Juda slogans were also raised against her. 

During Dharmsabha, Kajal Hindustani said that if Muslim women marry Hindu men, it would benefit them. After her speech, Muslim leaders filed a complaint against her and demanded action. An FIR was registered against Kajal under Section 295A, 153A, and 505 of the Indian Penal Code.

Mufti explains how to perform Istinja (cleaning anus after defecation) during Ramzan fast so that water does not enter stomach: fact check of the viral video

The Islamic holy month of Ramzan is going on when Muslims observe Roza, the dusk to dawn fast, and observe several other prescribed rules. In this context, a video related to Ramzan is going viral on social media. In a video, a Mufti is explaining how to perform Istinja in Ramzan while fasting. Istinja is the process of washing and cleaning the private parts after defecation or urination.

Since Muslims do not even eat or drink water throughout the day in Ramzan, the Mufti tells, in the viral video, how to wash the anus after defecation during fasting so that water does not go from the anus into the stomach. The issue is important because if any substance enters the stomach via either mouth or stomach during the Roza period, it will invalidate the fasting. The video of Mufti Mamur Badar Qasmi is going viral.

Mufti tells people to hold their breath while performing Istinja. After this, he shakes hands as he explains the process of washing the anus using water. Mufti argues that holding the breath will not open the anus, but will keep it tight and closed so that water will not go inside the stomach through the anus at the time of performing Istinja.

Mufti says that if something goes into the stomach through the mouth or through the anus, then the fast will be violated for that reason. Mufti also gives some examples of Islamic religious books to make his talk appear believable.

Do people who believe in Islam really ask such questions? Do Maulanas and Muftis really answer such questions of the people? We tried to explore this.

The viral video is just 47 seconds, so our first task was to find the entire video. Mufti Mamur Badar Qasmi’s official account was found on YouTube. Here’s a short video uploaded on April 5, 2023. In this, Mufti calls the viral video edited, calling it a conspiracy to defame himself.

After this short video, we searched for the original video of Mufti Mamur Badar Qasmi, which is being edited and made viral on social media. We found this original video, which was uploaded 2 years ago. This is a 7-minute 18 second video.

After watching the entire video, it is clear that Mufti Mamur Badar Qasmi spoke about the misconceptions about ‘how to wash the anus after defecation in fasting’. He told his viewers in the video that it is impossible to get water in the stomach through the anus while performing the Istinja. He said, yes, there is a possibility that a person whose anus is very loose may get water in his stomach while performing the Istinja.

According to Mufti Mamur Badar Qasmi, the anus is very tight. If someone wants to insert something in it, it goes inside with great difficulty. Mufti also told that whenever there is constipation one has to apply extra force while defecating. He further said that if the anus was so loose, faeces would come out during sleep or anytime during the day at a slight pressure. This proves that the anus is very hard and tight, clarified the Mufti. He said that the anus remains closed, and nothing can go inside and come outside without applying pressure.

In his short video, Mufti said that there is a Barelvi Maulana who was saying how to perform Istinja during the fast. We tried to find out if that Maulana advised people that one should perform Istinja in the fast by shrinking the anus inside. And do people who believe in Islam really ask such questions? Do Maulanas and Muftis really answer such questions of the people? We searched for videos about this too.

The video of Barelvi Maulana mentioned by Mufti Mamur Badar Qasmi in his video was also found on YouTube. That video is 5 years old. In the 2-minute 25-second video, different users ask Maulana two questions. The person with Maulana handles technical gadgets and writes questions on iPad. Maulana then answers these questions. The second question is related to Istinja. Maulana’s answer can be heard in this video.

In this video, Maulana says, “Do not breathe much while defecating in the fast. Shrink yourself as much as you can. Do not open too wide while you sit. This can cause water to reach the stomach, which will violate the fast.”

Therefore, it makes it clear that are conflicting opinions of clerics regarding the issue. In this example, one cleric claimed that water can enter the stomach via the anus and this will invalidate Ramzan fasting, while the other cleric said that it is not possible, but his video was edited to claim that he said the opposite.

The video of Mufti Mamur Badar Qasmi, which is viral on social media, is edited. Watching his entire video, it is clear that he has not given information on the issue of “how to wash the anus after defecation in Ramzan”.

However, questions like “How to wash the anus or perform Istinja after defecation during Ramzan fasting?” are asked by people who believe in Islam. Maulanas and Muftis also answer such questions of the people, and at least one such cleric claimed that water can enter the stomach via the anal opening.

Not an issue of satisfaction, we want to see action on the ground: MEA on attack on Indian High Commission in London

 It is not an issue of “satisfaction, we want to see action on the ground,” said Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Arindam Bagchi on the vandalism and attacks on the Indian High Commission in the United Kingdom.

Bagchi said this while addressing the weekly media briefing of the Ministry of External Affairs on Thursday. “Are we satisfied with actions against the vandalism and attacks on the High Commission? As I mentioned, the issue is not of satisfaction. We wanted to see action on the ground,” he said.

He also said, “We have been urging host countries, including the UK, to take action against those who vandalised the flag as well as the High Commission, identify them and take action against the perpetrators. We are certainly pressing them to continue to take measures to ensure security of premises, security-safety of our personnel who are there in London.”

“This is the ongoing conversation we are having with the UK authorities,” the MEA spokesperson added.

Regarding the violence at the Indian High Commission in London, UK Foreign Secretary James Cleverly has said, “Acts of violence towards staff at the Indian High Commission are unacceptable and I have made our position clear to the High Commissioner Vikram Doraiswami. The police investigation is ongoing and we are in close contact with the Indian High Commission in London and the Indian Government in New Delhi.”

“We are working with the Metropolitan Police to review security at the Indian High Commission, and will make the changes needed to ensure the safety of its staff as we did for today’s demonstration,” it added.

The UK Foreign Secretary’s official statement also read, “We will always take the security of the High Commission, and all foreign missions in the UK, extremely seriously, and prevent and robustly respond to incidents such as this.”

Notably, the Indian community in March, earlier this year, held a large gathering in front of the Indian High Commission against the “disrespectful act” of Khalistan supporters towards the Indian flag and demanded that the Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, and the British government act against the perpetrators at the earliest.

The desecration of the Indian Flag led to an unprecedented outpouring of support from the diverse Indian community in Britain.

Expats from all across the UK travelled to London to express their solidarity with the Indian Flag. The gathering resoundingly debunked the idea of Khalistan, saying there are no takers for it. 

(This news report is published from a syndicated feed. Except for the headline, the content has not been written or edited by OpIndia staff)

Bihar youth who worked in Bengaluru restaurant alleges harassment for not knowing Kannada, police claim argument over torn note turned into language issue

A native of Muzaffarpur, Bihar, Nitesh Yadav who was working at a food stand in Bengaluru complained that the locals were abusing him because of the language barrier. His inability to speak in Kannada allegedly led to his harassment, mockery, and even threats from the community.

“I am from Bihar’s Muzaffarpur and I work at a food stall in Bengaluru. The people who come to our stall have a major problem with the Hindi-speaking people. What do they think of themselves? Will they kill us? Everybody abuses and belittles us, without even showing mercy. I request the government to do justice to the Hindi-speaking people in Karnataka,” he can be seen stating in the viral video.

The youth also used some abusive language in the video. He claimed that three people who came to the eatery in Rajajinagar, where he works, and abused him for being a Bihari and not knowing Kannada.

“A few people came to eat food and I served all of them. I work hard to make ends meet and all I receive is abuse and hate. What is a Hindi-speaking man to these people? Is being Bihari a crime? Do we not belong to this country? I challenge, come and kill me now. I am ready,” the man was screaming in the video which was shot in front of his eatery in Rajajinagar and uploaded on his Facebook profile.

The incident took place on April 7, according to the police. However, the police said that it was an argument over a ‘torn currency note’ and ‘bad food’, and the youth deliberately made it a language issue. The customers gave the young guy called Nitesh Kumar Yadav a currency note that was reportedly ripped, and this caused an altercation between them, police said.

According to police, preliminary investigation shows that this turned into a big issue as the youth did not understand Kannada and the customers didn’t understand Hindi. “He intentionally turned this into a language issue by shouting in the middle of the road. We have learnt that he has returned home. No one has filed any complaint, so far,” the police remarked. The incident took place in April 7, according to Subramanyanagar police station officers.

Talking to The Indian Express, a police official said, “This was never actually a language row. There was a communication gap between the ladies and Yadav. We learnt that the ladies had visited the hotel and had ordered a rice item. However, they did not like the food and they paid the man with a torn Rs 100 note. A war of words ensued after he did not accept the money. In the heated argument, the Bihar man did not understand Kannada and the ladies did not understand Hindi.” The police officer further claimed that Yadav intentionally turned into a language issue.

The police also said that no complaint has been filed by anyone in this regard.

Responding to this issue, Bengaluru police commissioner, CH Pratap Reddy said, “The person has been identified by our North Division police. Prima facie it appears that there was an argument between the youth and the customers in the eatery. The inquiry has begun. Since the youth has returned to his hometown, we are collecting more details from him and action will be initiated.”

The senior officer further advised the locals to refrain from posting about any similar instances on social media and instead call 122 to report them. “If anyone dials 112 in trouble, within 30 minutes our teams will reach the spot. If the issue is not resolved, then people can opt to reach out through social media,” he conveyed.

“Bengaluru is a cosmopolitan city and mutual respect should be there between people from all regions,” he added.

Liberals demand ‘probe’ into the encounter of dreaded gangster Asad Ahmed even as his father admits links to ISI

On 13th April 2023, Asad Ahmed, son of gangster turned politician Atiq Ahmed, was killed in a police encounter at Jhansi. Asad Ahmed was wanted in the Umesh Pal murder case. Along with Asad, his associate Ghulam Muhammad was also killed in the encounter with the Uttar Pradesh Police STF.

As soon as the news of this encounter came to light, liberals started questioning the authenticity of this encounter and started demanding a probe into this encounter with the dreaded gangster. Bahujan Samaj Party chief Mayawati and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav were the flag bearers of the people questioning this encounter.

Akhilesh Yadav tweeted, “By doing false encounters, the BJP government is trying to divert attention from the real issues. The BJP does not believe in the court at all. Today’s and recent encounters should also be thoroughly investigated and the culprits should not be spared. The power does not have the right to decide what is right or wrong. BJP is against the brotherhood.”

Asking for a probe into this encounter, BSP supremo Mayawati tweeted, “Many types of discussions are going on about the killing of Prayagraj’s Atiq Ahmed’s son and another person in a police encounter today. People feel that their apprehension of a repeat of the Vikas Dubey incident has come true. Therefore, a high-level inquiry is necessary so that the complete facts and truth of the incident can come before the public.”

Trinamool Congress Party’s MP Mahua Moitra addressed the media and criticized the encounter of the gangster who had a reward of Rs. 5 lakhs on his head. She said, “This does not surprise me because I remember one of your colleagues (media person) was telling me before this, that gentleman who is brought from Gujarat to Meerut and in connection with that the honourable chief minister of Uttar Pradesh Mr Ajay Bisht, had said that cars can overturn. His real name is Ajay Bisht. He calls himself a Yogi. But I redescribe his name. I call people by their real names. So, anyways, his car overturned and he said that cars can overturn. The other name for Mr Ajay Bisht was ‘Mr Thok Do’. Because whenever he was a chief minister or when he was an MP, he would like to tell his police and law and order enforcement agencies, ‘Thok do’ which means finish them off. So this kind of lawlessness, jungle rule without resorting to the rule of law, encounters killings have always flourished under the honourable gentleman and continue to do so.”

Mahua Moitra further said, “I hope that the people of India will see this, for what it is is just the tip of the ice. So when you start with something that is incitement of violence like ‘Maar Do’, ‘Kaat Do’, ‘Jala Do’, this kind of hatred, venom this is the kind of culture that ultimately lands up in the kind of jungle law. Why do we have a constitution? Why did we become independent? Because we wanted to live under the framework of the rule of the law. That is the most important thing our constitution guarantees us. So when you have a chief minister, a home minister that is basically sitting there saying that puppies get crushed under the vehicle or cars can overturn or it is okay if somebody dies, then you are basically pointing fingers at the constitution, which is exactly what the government and the BJP is doing day after day after day.”

Asad Ahmed was planning to free Atiq Ahmed

Notably, Asad Ahmed, son of the mafia don Atiq Ahmed, who was killed in an encounter with the Uttar Pradesh police Special Task Force, was planning to get his father out of the police custody. Prashant Kumar, Special Director General, Law and Order, Uttar Pradesh Police, shared this information on 13th April 2023.

Asad Ahmed was plotting to get his father Atiq Ahmed out of police custody. For this, he was also planning to attack the police convoy. Asad Ahmed wanted to execute his plans when Atiq Ahmed was being brought to UP, the SDGP said. the encounter took place on the same day when Atiq Ahmed – who was taken to Prayagraj by road from Gujarat’s Sabarmati jail – and his brother Ashraf both were produced before the chief judicial magistrate’s court in connection with the Umesh Pal murder case. After Umesh Pal’s murder, Asad and Ghulam were both on the run. Several teams of STF were deployed to nab the two miscreants who were finally killed in an encounter.

Atiq Ahmed confessed his links with Pakistan’s ISI and Lashkar-e-Taiba

As liberals demand a probe into the death of Asad Ahmed in an encounter to shield the mafia-turned-politician and former Samajwadi Party MP Atiq Ahmed and his gang under the garb of respecting the constitution, it becomes necessary to see how the encounter took place and whom the deceased Asad Ahmed was planning to free from the police custody.

According to police officials, on Thursday, when an STF (Special Task Force) team stopped Asad and Ghulam, who were trying to escape on a motorcycle in Jhansi, both of them opened fire on the STF team. Asad and Ghulam were killed in the STF’s retaliatory action.

Also, on Thursday, the Prayagraj Chief Judicial Magistrate ordered Atiq Ahmed and his brother Ashraf to four days in police custody in the Umesh Pal murder case. Both were detained by police on April 13. Atiq Ahmed said in a statement to Uttar Pradesh Police that he has direct connections with Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and terror outfit Lashkar-e-Taiba.

In his statement included in the police chargesheet, Atiq Ahmed said, “I have no dearth of weapons because I have direct connections with Pakistan’s ISI and the terror organisation Lashkar-e-Taiba. Weapons from Pakistan are dropped on the Punjab border with the help of drones and local connection collects them. Terrorists in Jammu and Kashmir get weapons from this consignment. If you take me with you, I can help you recover the money, arms, and ammunition used in the incident.”

On March 28, an MP-MLA court convicted and sentenced Atiq Ahmed to rigorous life imprisonment in the kidnapping of now-dead Umesh Pal. Atiq Ahmed, who has been charged in over 100 instances over the last 43 years, was convicted in the same case.

Media reports claim Hindu Mahasabha members conspired to falsely implicate innocent Muslims for cow slaughter in Agra, here is the truth

Several media outlets such as ‘Times of India’ (TOI), ‘Scroll’, ‘ThePrint’, and leftist propaganda portal ‘The Wire’ have reported that four members of the Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha (ABHM) have been arrested for planning to slaughter a cow to falsely implicate Muslim men in Agra.

The media reports stated that the four accused namely—Sanjay Jat, Saurabh Sharma, Jitendra Kushwaha, and Brajesh Bhadoria had lodged a fake complaint to settle a rivalry.

Based on their complaint, a first information report was registered against four Muslims – Mohammad Rizwan, Mohammad Nakim and Mohammad Shanu, and Imran Qureshi – for slaughtering a cow. However, police investigation later revealed that the four men had nothing to do with the incident,” Scroll report stated.

Meanwhile, The Print reported, “On 30 March, the police said, Jat and his accomplices allegedly got a cow slaughtered in a field near Agra’s Mehtab Bagh and falsely accused four Muslim men — Rizwan, Nakeem, Chhotu and Shanu — of the act.”

The Print report further claims that a case was registered by the police against the four Muslim men in order to maintain peace and prevent the situation from escalating. 

While these media reports insinuated that the whole matter was about ABHM members conspiring to falsely implicate Muslim men Rizwan, Nakim, Shanu, and Imran for slaughtering a cow and fan communal tensions, however, police disclosures suggest that the conflict was between Muslims, with participants from Hindu groups ostensibly working as allies. It is pertinent to note that the youths who killed the cow, Imran and Shanu, are Muslims who reportedly collaborated with other Hindus to file a complaint in an effort to put an end to their long-standing enmity with Rizwan and others.

The entire incident began at 1 in the morning on March 30, when Jitendra filed an FIR of cow slaughter in the vicinity of the Agra Police Etmaddaula police station. As per the complaint, four people named Rizwan, Nakeem, Bijju, and Shanu were slaughtering a cow and selling beef in the bushes near the Gautam Nagar cave.

Jitendra and his friends, Vishal and Manish Pandit, the complaint said, had visited the spot, only to discover that the accused had fled, leaving the butchered cow behind. They urged the police to take strong action against the culprits, branding them as cruel cow slaughterers. The police began their inquiry after filing the FIR (a copy of which is available with Opindia) under Sections 429 of the IPC and 3/5/8 of the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act.

On April 5, the police learned of the presence of five individuals in the city who were involved in the killing of cows. Furthermore, the police came to know that the perpetrators were planning to escape on a bike and a scooter. However, two of them, Shanu and Imran, were apprehended while riding a scooter during the police raid.

Three charges have already been filed against Imran in Agra while Shanu has six active cases in the city. Most of these cases are of cow slaughter. Salman and another offender managed to get away. 

While the media reports are asserting that the Muslims accused in the case are innocent, both of the arrested accused Shanu and Imran confessed that they had a history of animosity with Agra residents, including Nakeem, Bijo, and Rizwan, during their interrogation. They suspected that Nakeem, who worked for the Agra Municipal Corporation, had a role in sending Jhallu and Imran to jail some time back.

Since then, both of them desperately wanted to teach him and his friends a lesson. So they elaborately planned to slaughter a cow and later place the blame on Nakeem, Rizwan, and others. To execute their machinations, Shanu, Imran, and others killed a stray cow in an empty field in Gautam Nagar.

The cow slaughterers roped in Sanjay Jat, Saurabh Sharma, Brijesh Bhadoria, Ajay, and Jitendra to lure them to their adversaries. They added that Sanjay Jat and his friends knew about the occurrence beforehand and were prepared to instigate trouble for Nakeem and others by filing an FIR following the cow’s death.

It is alleged that all of them were continuously in touch with one another, both on the phone and in person, before and after the incident. According to the plan, Jitendra filed an FIR against Rizwan, Nakeem, and others after the occurrence, and he and his friends pressured authorities to take the latter into custody. 

Sanjay Jat is rejected by ‘Hindu groups’

A member of the ‘Bajrang Dal’ in Agra spoke with OpIndia on the condition of anonymity and they said that the working methods of Sanjay Jat and his associates are already under question. He labelled the accused and his aides as being capricious. Moreover, SHO Etmaddaula informed us that Sanjay Jat and the other conspirators are already rejected by the ‘Hindu Mahasabha’ and other authentic Hindu bodies.

Rahul Gandhi defamation case: Hearing completed in Surat court, verdict to be delivered on April 20

0

The hearing in Surat’s Sessions Court on the plea of ​​Congress leader Rahul Gandhi to stay the two-year sentence awarded to him in a criminal defamation case has been completed. The court has reserved the verdict following the hearing. The verdict will be pronounced on 20 April. During the hearing, Senior Advocate RS Cheema placed Rahul Gandhi’s point in front of the court.

The court had earlier given an exemption to Rahul Gandhi not to be present during the hearing. Rahul Gandhi’s lawyer argued in the court that the defamation case regarding Rahul’s comment on Modi’s surname was not justified. He also argued that there was no need for maximum punishment in the case. In this case, the petitioner Purnesh Modi, in his reply filed in the court, opposing the petition to stay Gandhi’s conviction, had said that the Congress leader is used to making defamatory statements repeatedly.

Senior Advocate RS Cheema said that Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides for suspension of sentence pending appeal. He said power is an exception but the court should consider the consequences of punishment. He said that the court should consider whether the convict would suffer irreparable harm and it is an injustice to get such punishment.

On March 23, Rahul Gandhi was sentenced to two years in a defamation case. Shortly after the sentence was announced, he was granted bail for 30 days. His membership in the Lok Sabha was canceled as well the very next day after the sentence was pronounced.

On March 27, the Lok Sabha Housing Committee sent a notice to Rahul to vacate his government bungalow. The committee asked him to vacate the government residence at 12 Tughlaq Road by 22 April. Rahul has decided to vacate the bungalow and live in his mother Sonia Gandhi’s residence.

Rahul Gandhi had filed a main petition in the Surat court and made 2 applications. The decision of the lower court was challenged in the main petition. While the first of the two applications was to stay the conviction, the second was to stay the sentence.

Living in Pakistan was like living in jail, couldn’t go out as Babar Azam fans were waiting: New Zealand cricketer Simon Doull

0

In a startling admission, former New Zealand cricketer turned commentator, Simon Doull stated that he had to face serious threats in Pakistan after he criticised Babar Azam.

Doull was in Pakistan as part of the Pakistan Super League (PSL) commentary team where he criticised the Peshawar Zalmi captain during the competition for slowing down as he neared his century.

“Rather than putting the team first, the last little while, that’s all that been happening. Rather than looking for boundaries, still, so much firepower to come. Hundreds are brilliant, stats are great, but it has to be team first,” he noted.

Simon Doull’s observations quickly gained attention, including that of the Pakistan captain, who was later spotted speaking with him. Simon Doull is currently in India for IPL, however, he remembered his time in the neighbouring country and unveiled the adversity he went through there.

“Living in Pakistan is like living in jail,” he opened up, shocking everyone. “I was not allowed to go out as Babar Azam fans were waiting for me. And I stayed in Pakistan without food for many days. Even I was mentally tortured but by the grace of God I somehow escaped from Pakistan,” he informed.

During their game against Quetta Gladiators in PSL 2023, Peshawar Zalmi skipper Babar Azam hit his maiden hundred. He reached 83 off 46 balls but needed an additional 14 balls to reach 100, which caused the commentator to slam the self-centred strategy.

Following his assertions, a heated dispute about the topic ensued between him and retired Pakistan all-rounder Aamir Sohail.