Home Blog Page 6158

Conversion at Karnataka High Court? Islamic proselytising organisation distributed Quran among judges and advocates

On a day when a Ranchi court ordered a Hindu girl to distribute 5 Qurans as a condition for her bail who was arrested for a Facebook comment, the activities of an organisation engaged in conversion to Islam in courts and other government organisations in Karnataka have come to light.

The state of Karnataka is home to Salaam Centre, an Islamic organization that engages in ‘Dawah’ or the Islamic practice of converting non-Muslims to Muslim. As per its website, it “is engaged in presenting the Quran, among non-Muslim brothers and sisters. It has introduced the teachings of Islam, the Quran and Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) to thousands of people.”

The website states further, “Its campaign ‘Quran for All’ was hugely successful in conveying the Quranic message to professionals such as doctors, police officials, teachers, advocates, judges, academicians, intellectuals, I.T. professionals and students.”

Its founder, Syed Hamid Mohsin, has even engaged in Dawah at the Karnataka High Court and has distributed copies of the Quran to the judges and advocates of the Court. He says on the website, “Soon after the successful programme of introduction and distribution of The Quran in the conference hall of the Karnataka High Court I thought, why not personally present The Quran to the Judges and advocates by visiting their offices. When I discussed this with a few Muslim advocates, they opined, it is perhaps not an easy task to visit the Judges’ chambers to present them with the copies of The Quran. I said; let us give it a try. This is the Word of God, and Allah will surely help us in this work.”

Quran distribution in City Civil Court of Bengaluru

Mohsin further states that meeting with the Judges continued for 12 days. He writes further, “The honourable Judges welcomed us warmly, on seeing the Quran in our hands they stood up respectfully. We presented to them The Quran, a book on The Life of Prophet Muhammad (s), Basic Islamic literature, and DVD of The Quran. They offered us seating next to them. They opened our gift box with utmost care and respect, and immediately started reading The Quran. Then they would start a discussion on The Quran, Prophet Muhammad (s), Islam, and Muslims.”

The Quran was also given to the libraries of the Court which didn’t have it until then according to Mohsin. It was also distributed to numerous advocates and other officers who work at the Court.

An advocate was quoted by Mohsin as saying, “I had received The Quran from you five days back and have read it. I did not find anything against Hindus in it. Whereas we were told that The Quran only contains poison against Hindus. We were also told that The Quran exhorts for Jihad against Hindus. But nothing of such sort is there in The Quran. After reading it my misunderstandings have been eliminated. Now I will study The Quran seriously and would try to dispel the misunderstanding in others.”

Quran distribution in police station

Mohsin has also studiously documented on his website numerous things about the Quran which non-Muslim judges of the Karnataka High Court have apparently told him. One of them supposedly said, “Yes, I would like to study The Quran to know what Message Allah has given foe all humanity. If the Quran contains Message for all human beigns then why have you kept this away from the humanity till now?”

Another apparently told him, “I have been observing from the past ten years that there has been gigantic level of atrocities on Islam and Muslims. Now as a remedial measure for these atrocities, you have to popularize The Quran for the next ten years. This has to be done on a bigger scale continuously. Otherwise things may turn worse for Muslims.”

It appears rather intriguing that the Karnataka High Court allowed itself to be turned into a ground for Islamic proselytizing given the fact that the Indian Judiciary continuously harps on and on about the secular nature of our Constitution.

Mohsin claims to have engaged in Dawah even at the Karnataka Legislative Council and can be seen presenting a Quran to the former Chief Minister of Karnataka, Siddaramaiah in a photo that was posted on its website.

Mr. Syed Hamid Mohsin, Chairman Salaam Centre presenting the book on Prophet Muhammad in Kannada language to Hon’ble Chief Miinister of Karnataka Mr. Siddaramaiah.
Source: salaamcentre.in

The Salaam Centre claims to have engaged in Dawah at Police departments as well. In one post, it says, “The Salaam Centre has added one more feather to its cap by taking the message of the Holy Quran to the personnel of the Karnataka State Police. The initiative is likely to have very positive outcome. Insha Allah!” Not merely Police departments, the organization had distributed the Quran at the Head Quarters of Karnataka State Internal Security Intelligence as well.

The website says Mohsin is “a man with a mission, a mission to educate Muslims and millions of people so that the walls of ignorance are demolished.” It says further, “Mr. Mohsin conducted historic programmes for Introduction and distribution of Quran among the legal fraternity in the High Court of Karnataka, various district courts in the State, Police Headquarters and CID Head Quarters, State Intelligence Headquarters and various Government offices. The Institute of Management-Bangalore and the Cochin University are among the various educational institutions where such programmes were also held.”

While Mohsin’s actions are not illegal under the current statutes, it is indeed a matter of concern that arms of the supposedly secular state machinery are being targeted for proselytizing. Furthermore, an unstable demography is a recipe for chaos. Under such circumstances, Hindus are being targeted for conversion not only by Christians but by Muslims as well.

As a pagan faith that does not have an institutional concept of conversions, Hinduism is at a distinct disadvantage in this aspect. Therefore, for the explicit purpose of preserving the secular ethos of the country and to prevent demography for destabilizing further, a national law against proselytizing ought to be considered.

The best celebratory moments of England’s win in the World Cup Final

The first world cup was played in 1975 in England and England finally wins the World Cup title in 2019, after 44 years of its start. The World Cup final 2019 is regarded as the best ODI game ever and we all believe it.

The joy and happiness on the faces of English players and fans tell you the story, and what an incredible win it was, decided by the most number of boundaries.

The moment was captured by broadcasters’ cameras and fans all over the world. Here are some of the moments of cricketers, commentators, and fans celebrating after England won the World Cup.

The last ball of the Super Six in the World Cup Final

The victory from a different angle

Inside the Commentary box of BBC

The famous fan club of English cricket, The Barmy Army

Fans celebrate together watching it on a big screen at Trafalgar Square

The other angle of the Trafalgar square

English fans celebrating at home

English fans celebrating in a bar 

England will play arch-rivals Australia for Ashes series at home starting from August 1.

Here are 7 bizarre judgments by the Indian Judiciary that highlight the need for urgent reforms

A court in Jharkhand today delivered what can only be described as a bizarre verdict. It ordered a Hindu girl today to distribute 5 copies of the Quran for exercising her freedom of speech. Quite assuredly, there are absolutely no provisions in the Constitution for such punishments. It was invented out of thin air.

But it’s not the first time that the rather bizarre tendencies of the Indian Judiciary has been on display. In this article, we revisit some of them.

1. No Bird-Feeding

Earlier this year, in March, the Supreme Court issued a verdict that people cannot feed birds from a flat’s balcony as bird droppings could then create a nuisance for others in a residential society.

That people filed a case in the Court and the highest court of the country decided to spend its precious time in delivering a verdict upon a matter which should have been resolved by authorities of the residential society and other responsible adults rather than waste the time of the Court highlights the immediate need for judicial reforms.

2. Delirious Cacophony of Inexplicable Capricious Vacillating Codswallop

In April, 2017, the Supreme Court was forced to send a judgment delivered by a High Court judge in Himachal Pradesh because the bench could not understand the verdict due to its highly convoluted language.

Here are some excerpts:

“However, the learned counsel…cannot derive the fullest succour from the aforesaid acquiescence… given its sinew suffering partial dissipation from an imminent display occurring in the impugned pronouncement hereat wherewithin unravelments are held qua the rendition recorded by the learned Rent Controller…”

“The summum bonum of the aforesaid discussion is that all the aforesaid material which existed before the learned Executing Court standing slighted besides their impact standing untenably undermined by him whereupon the ensuing sequel therefrom is of the learned Executing Court while pronouncing its impugned rendition overlooking the relevant and germane evidence besides its not appreciating its worth. Consequently, the order impugned suffers from a gross absurdity and perversity of misappreciation of material on record.”

3. Sardar Jokes

Consistent with its inconsistent approach towards the issue of Freedom of Expression, the Supreme Court in 2016 decided to hear pleas seeking a ban on jokes pertaining to the Sikh community. It was also seriously considering options to ban the circulation of such jokes. “We will certainly look into it if entire community is feeling harassed,” the bench had said.

Ultimately, after a year, the Court ruled that it could not ban such jokes as they could not “lay down moral guidelines” for citizens. But it wasn’t before precious time and the taxpayers’ money was wasted.

4. Condom Packets

In 2016, the Supreme Court directed the Additional Solicitor General Maninder Singh to answer whether advertisement on condom packets violated laws of obscenity. “You tell us whether action can be taken on these ads or not… Take a look at the advertisements available on record and also others and then tell us what is your stand,” the bench told the ASG.

Singh was asked to go through “objectionable” pictures on packets of condoms and contraceptives and inform the Court whether they were compliant with advertising norms. “Do you have any plan to regulate such advertisements? Is there a way you can check what is going to be printed on these packets or can you take action only after these packets with pictures are available in the market? You also have to tell us if such advertisements may constitute a penal offence,” the bench told Singh.

Amusingly enough, the bench was hearing petitions against a verdict of the Madras High Court which had ruled that condom packets should not contain “sexy” pictures.

5. Shut up, give her a baby!

In what is, perhaps, the most bizarre verdict in the list, a man was ordered by a court to donate his sperm so that his estranged wife could have a baby. Even more bizarre was the fact that divorce proceedings were underway for the couple.

The Court ordered the man, against his wishes, to explore assisted reproductive technology (ART) with his estranged wife or else, there would be legal consequences. The order said, “The respondent may refuse ART by not giving his consent. But by unreasonable refusal he may expose himself to the legal and logical consequences which may follow.”

The order justified its decision by conjuring the myth of Patriarchy. It declared, “Reproductive right is closely and directly related to women. But, in the patriarchal society in India, the majority of women lack the decision-making power,” the court observed.

6. No IPL at drought hit Maharashtra

The Bombay High Court ruled that IPL matches in the state should be shifted elsewhere and the water used to maintain the stadiums should be instead diverted to drought hit areas. “Shifting IPL matches wont solve the problem but if water is diverted to drought-hit areas problem can be solved to some extent,” Bombay HC stated.

Earlier, the Court had called using water to maintain stadiums a ‘criminal waste’. “People don’t get water in Marathwada for three to four days. This is a criminal waste,” it had declared. The order appeared incredulous considering the fact that it was unclear the extent to which the drought woes could be resolved. Furthermore, punishing IPL for sins it hadn’t committed was rather harsh to put it mildly.

7. The Chappal-Sandal conundrum

The matter of Chappals and Sandals acquired special significance after the government had withdrawn a 10% duty drawback given to a footwear manufacturer claiming the footwear exported by it were chappals, not sandals. Sandals carried a 10% custom duty drawback while chappals carried only 5%.

After careful consideration of facts of paramount importance, the Delhi High Court ruled that women’s footwear without a back strap is a sandal, not a chappal, thus providing the answer to a mystery that has plagued human civilization since centuries.

Need for Judicial Reforms

The above-mentioned cases combined with the instances where it has delivered inconsistent verdicts revolving around Freedom of Expression, religious practices and other matters highlight the urgent necessity of judicial reforms. In certain cases, it exalts freedom of expression while in others, it asks people to apologize for a meme. In some cases, it is overeager to interfere with religious practices while in others, it refuses to even entertain them.

Barkha Dutt files complaint with NCW against Kapil Sibal’s wife for abusing female employees of Tiranga TV

The National Commission for women has taken cognisance on a complaint filed against Tiranga TV promoter Promila Sibal accusing her of abusing female staff members of the channel including Barkha Dutt.


The NCW also clarified that they are not taking up the sacking of employees of the channel, it is only taking up the matter of outraging the modesty of women.

In a series of tweets posted yesterday, Barkha Dutt had alleged that journalists working at Tiranga TV were abruptly sacked, without any prior notice and they were not offered 6-months severance payout. She also alleged that senior Congress leader Kapil Sibal and his wife-Promila Sibal had referred to the female employees of their channel Tiranga TV as Kutiya or Bitch.


Barkha had mentioned in her tweets that the abuse meted out by Promila Sibal to the female employees is a fit case for NCW’s intervention. She affirmed that she will place signed affidavits to prove her case.

After the tweets of Barkha Dutt, NCW chairperson Rekha Sharma had replied to her, asking her to send the details of the incident to her official email address.


Barkha Dutt had also said that Kapil Sibal had threatened her of defamation suit for calling him Mallya. She had compared him with the fugitive liquor barron for not paying due compensation to fired employees and going to London. Dutt had said that she refuses to withdraw the comment, and will fight the case if required.

Barkha Dutt accused Kapil Sibal’s wife of being insensitive to the plight of employees. According to the former NDTV editor, Promita Sibal who runs a meat factory said, “I shut down factory without giving a paisa to labour, who are these journalists to ask for 6 months salary.” Kapil Sibal earns crores every day but he won’t pay 200 employees industry norm of 6 months or at least 3 months payout, ruining the lives of 200 plus people, she tweeted.

Later, in the evening, the crisis took an ugly turn when Kapil Sibal appointed bouncers at the Tiranga TV office to intimidate journalists who were sitting on a peaceful protest against the channel’s unprofessional conduct. Employees were apparently on an all-night sit-in dharna to demand a 6-month payout.

Karnataka speaker is delaying acceptance of resignations because he wants to keep a minority government in power: Mukul Rohatgi in SC

The Supreme Court hearing the petition of the rebel Congress-JDS MLAs in Karnataka decided to pronounce its orders at 10.30 PM on Wednesday, July 17.

A Supreme Court bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi along with Justice Deepak Gupta and Aniruddha Bose was hearing a petition of 15 Congress-JDS rebel MLAs against the Speaker’s decision to not accept their resignation.

On Friday, the court had ordered the speaker to maintain the status quo with regard to resignation and disqualification of 10 rebel MLAs. The top court on Thursday had directed the Karnataka Speaker to take a decision on the resignations submitted by the disgruntled Congress-JD(S) MLAs.

However, Speaker KR Ramesh Kumar had told the court that he would need time to examine the resignation letters of the dissidents and determine whether they were coerced or the resignations were voluntary.

Today, senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi appearing for the rebel MLAs of the Congress-JDS coalition said five more legislators have given resignation to the speaker, but the speaker is not accepting it. “Incompetent proceedings are inappropriate,” said Rohatgi.

The five legislators – Anand Singh, K Sudhakar, N Nagaraj, Munirathna and Roshan Baig filed a petition before a bench of Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justice Deepak Gupta on Monday. The apex court heard the petition of these five more lawmakers who sought a similar relief like the ten other rebel MLAs.

Mukul Rohatgi added that all the ten petitioners had given their resignations on July 10, and notice for disqualification proceedings was issued only against two of them as on that date.

“The role of the Speaker under Article 190 and 10th Schedule of Constitution is different. Therefore, the pendency of disqualification proceedings is not a bar to accept resignations,” he added.

Citing former Congress MLA Umesh Jadhav’s case, Rohatgi said that resignation was accepted notwithstanding disqualification proceedings, so Speaker did not consider it a bar then. Rohatgi said that he was not asking the court to quash the disqualification proceedings but he said he was against infringing of rights of legislators.

“Disqualification can go on. I am saying I don’t want to be an MLA. I don’t want to defect. I want to go back to the public and do whatever I want to do. It is my right to do what I want to do. Speaker is infringing that right of mine,” argued Mukul Rohatgi.

Rohtagi further added that the decision of a Speaker is to look into whether a legislator is being forced to resign is supposed to be beneficial to the legislator. The role of the Speaker is to make sure he is not being forced. The silence of the Speaker on resignations is deemed sanction said Rohtagi.

“The speaker is coercing me to continue, to sit and speak in a particular group of which I don’t want to be a part of,” said senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi.

Senior Advocate Rohtagi stated that the resignation does not require any inquiry unless the Speaker has credible material that there is coercion. Legislators are not bureaucrats or public servants that they have to give reasons for resignation, he added.

“Art. 190 says if the resignation is by hand and there is no other material, the Speaker has to take a decision as fast as possible. He cannot keep it pending,” Rohatgi.

“These people are before Supreme Court saying they have resigned, crying before TV they have resigned. And yet this is allowed to continue, this is ridiculous. In this case, the Speaker says the reason for resignation is to avoid disqualification. That does not mean it is involuntary. Hence, he cannot keep it pending,” argued Rohatgi.

Senior advocate and Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi appearing on behalf of the Karnataka speaker said that resignation cannot be an escape route to disqualification proceedings. If trust vote is a day after and a legislator resigns against the interest of the party, he can be subjected to disqualification proceedings, said Singhvi.

“The act of disqualification is the act of defiance of the whip,” said Singhvi.

Singhvi said that the first step to start inquiry under Article 190 is for concerned MLA to appear before Speaker in person and the rebel MLAs met the speaker only on July 11. Singhvi claimed that eleven of the 15 MLAs handed over resignations personally to Speaker only on July 11 and four of the MLAs are yet to do so.  

The CJI questioned Singhvi’s claim asking on Speaker’s unavailability for an appointment which led to MLAs filing a petition in the top court. However, Singhvi claimed that it was factually wrong and Speaker has filed an affidavit to that effect that an appointment was not sought.

Chief Justice of India asked the Speaker to decide on the resignations in one week and then decide on the disqualifications.

Singhvi said that the court cannot direct the Speaker to take a decision to order Speaker to decide on resignations. “The Speaker has sought time to decide. According to Karnataka assembly rules, the resignation has to be in person. Disqualification and resignation cannot be unscrambled. Have to be decided by a common order,” Mr Singhvi said.

However, the bench said, “You cannot question our jurisdictional powers when we, to your benefit, had ordered a floor test, appointed a pro-tem Speaker in a midnight hearing. The exercise of jurisdiction of our powers depends only on self-restraint. Are you trying to restrict the power of the Supreme Court.”

Singhvi maintained that there is a direct link between the resignations and disqualification proceedings in this case and asked the bench to look at it independently. Singhvi reiterated that all resignations happened only on July 11 and all disqualification proceedings pre-date the resignations.

Senior Advocate Rajeev Dhavan, a counsel for Karnataka Chief Minister HD Kumaraswamy appearing before the Supreme Court stated that the Speaker needs to find the reason behind the mass resignation. 

“Every MLA who went to Mumbai wants to be Minister. It is not an individual’s case but a pack of 10 MLAs. It is a matter to be decided by evening,” said Dhavan. 

Dhavan argued that a strategy of the other side has been clearly disclosed as the rebel MLAs have clearly stated their intentions of becoming ministers once resignations are accepted. So that motive is what Speaker has to go into, added Dhavan.

“It is the motive which is important. 15 people are hunting in a pack. They flew to Mumbai when they could have met the Speaker,” said Dhavan.

Similar to Singhvi, Rajeev Dhavan maintained that the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to decide on the case. The two interim orders passed last week was in excess of this Court’s jurisdiction, said Dhavan.

He said that the Supreme Court Rules are clearly stating that it will not entertain a petition under Article 32 unless there is a fundamental right involved. Article 190 should be read along with the Tenth schedule, argued Dhavan.

Chief Minister Kumaraswamy’s counsel reiterated that the Supreme Court doesn’t have jurisdiction to pass interim orders asking the Speaker to maintain status quo on MLAs resignation or disqualification. “This is not Speaker vs Court. This is between CM and somebody who wants to become CM by bringing down govt,” Dhavan argued in the Court.

Rajeev Dhavan also made submissions on the doctrine of “political thicket”. Dhavan stated that the intent of the opposition is to defeat the government by luring numbers before the budget. “Political thicket doctrine does not say to Your Lordships that we can enter any political thicket we like,” said Dhavan.

Concluding his arguments, Rajeev Dhavan said that there has to be a full debate on the issue and there cannot be a truncated debate on this.

Countering the argument of the speaker that there was no fundamental right violated by not allowing them to resign, Mukul Rohatgi said that his right to resign and do what I want is being violated with speaker refusing to accept the resignations.

Constitutional Rules mandates the speaker to decide immediately provided it is genuine and voluntary, said Rohatgi. He added that the speaker has no mandate under the Constitution to go into my mind to find out why someone has resigned.

“Suppose Speaker does not decide on disqualification for 4 years, then will our resignations also be kept pending or what,” asked Rohatgi. Rohatgi said that this was a government which has lost majority and the Speaker only wants to prop up a government which is in minority.

It is only fitting that Barkha Dutt’s last show on Kapil Sibal’s channel was on Kargil War

Barkha Dutt, who is probably the most controversial journalist of India in the last decade, is back in the news after remaining out of the limelight for a couple of years. Yesterday she stormed into the scene with a series of tweets which exposed what is going on inside the channel where she is currently employed, English news channel Tiranga TV.

Barkha Dutt compared Congress leader Kapil Sibal, the owner of the channel, with Vijay Mallya, for firing around 200 employees without paying adequate compensation and then going to London instead of meeting protesting employees. She made several other serious allegations against Kapil Sibal and his wife, who had started the channel just before the elections.

Today Barkha Dutt posted another tweet, saying there is poetry in the fact that her “last” show in the channel is related to the Kargil war, which had transformed her.


It is true that the Kargil war had transformed a young Barkha Dutt into a prominent journalist after her reporting from bunkers of Indian Army became the talk of the nation during the war. Although she said it is poetic that her last show on the channel is on Kargil based on her personal experience, there are more aspects to it that it makes it more poetic.

It is poetic because a deeply personal tribute to Kargil was presented on Tiranga TV, a channel backed by a prominent Congress leader which was launched to help the party in the elections. The Kargil war took place during the Atal Bihari Vajpayee government, and Congress has always attempted to dissociate itself from it. Congress leaders had famously said that Kargil was BJP’s war, and its victory should be celebrated by NDA parties only.

Initially, the UPA government also did not organise the Kargil Vijay Divas on 26th July, it was organised by armed forces only, although defence minister and prime minister used to attend the celebrations. The government started celebrating it officially from 2010 after BJP MP Rajeev Chandrashekhar had asked for it in Rajya Sabha.

But it does not end here, it is also poetic that the show was hosted by Barkha Dutt. She had reported the Kargil War from the frontlines and brought the war into drawing rooms, but the way she covered it remains controversial. There are allegations that her live reporting of the war may have compromised the position of Indian forces. In fact, a book written by an army officer confirms that the army was indeed spooked at least once due to reporting by Barkha Dutt. There are unconfirmed allegations that she used camera flashlights on Tiger Hill when she was with Indian defence forces, which could have given away the location. Questions were also raised on the iridium satellite phone she had used to cover the war, as its location could be traced by the enemy.

Therefore, it is indeed poetic that a show on Kargil was done a channel backed by a Congress leader, and it was hosted by Barkha Dutt.

Yes Pratik Sinha, the ISRO chairman would pray for a second time before attempting to launch the Chandrayaan 2 again

0

Unless you’ve been living under a rock you would have known that ISRO had attempted to launch the Chandrayaan 2 on July 15. Yes, its India’s second mission to the moon. And yes they have aborted the mission an hour before it could be launched.

A lunar mission is complex. Although rocket launch is not new to ISRO, the Chandrayaan 2 would be attempting to land on the south polar region of the moon, which has never been attempted by any other country before. In this mission, there could be plenty of things that could go wrong. A mistake could result in huge wastage of money and resources. Therefore aborting the launch is smart, even if there is a slight chance of failure. ISRO didn’t fail in its mission, it succeeded in preventing a potential disaster. The ball is still in its court now.

Something that is even more complex than the lunar mission, is the reaction on Twitter. ISRO Chairman K Sivan prayed for a successful mission at the Tirumala temple on July 13, that’s two days before the launch. Some folks own Twitter pounced on the opportunity after the launch was aborted. Here is exhibit A, the one and only:

Some did try to explain to him but none of that matters because praying at a temple before a rocket launch is an “unscientific tradition” according to Pratik Sinha, founder of AltNews that regulatly peddles fake news. 

And here is exhibit B. Although, in my opinion, he should have waited for a day like Pratik Sinha. But that didn’t stop Twitterati from sharing the same the article and tweeting about it in the same fashion.

Science is based on evidence. It’s commonly accepted that there is insufficient evidence about the nature of temple rituals. Maybe they’re right in saying that it is an “unscientific tradition” to go to the temple before a launch. But what’s the harm in doing so. Why are so many people bothered by this?

ISRO represents the best of what Indians can achieve in the field of science and technology. Yet, people are bothered about a simple tradition. At least they do not brainwash a set of people to commit abhorrent crimes, promising them of a bright future in heaven. Pratik Sinha himself is a man who doesn’t rely on evidence. Who would call Zakir Musa, a slain terrorist who wanted to establish Islamic rule, a separatist? Pratik Sinha would.

Besides the promotion of unscientific rituals isn’t uncommon in the modern world. Have you blown a candle for your birthday? Might be a beautiful ritual for you but can you call it scientific? Kids are asked to wish something while blowing the candle. Yet, no one has any complaints about that. In fact, this is actually better than the ritual of giving birthday bumps or smashing a cake on the face.

I wonder if the likes of Pratik Sinha are free from such “unscientific traditions”. Nevertheless, they would continue to mock the very people who are actually doing something to contribute to science.

And yes, Pratika Sinha. It’s most likely that the ISRO chairman would pray at the Tirumala before the second launch because he knows what he’s doing.

For those who don’t know, ISRO aims to hunt for sources of water at the south pole of the moon. The water might give insights to the early days of the Earth and the solar system. The water could also be utilized in some way in the future. Besides this reports suggest that ISRO would be hunting Helium-3 which in the distant future might be a source of wasteless nuclear fuel.

They are attempting this at with a budget significantly cheaper than the budget of several Hollywood movies. ISRO had also clarified that they had aborted the launch only so as to not take any chances. Reportedly, it wasn’t a big problem and ISRO would have gone ahead with the launch for most missions.

New RTR flyover finally opens in Delhi: Read how inordinate delays were caused by ‘influential residents’ like Karan Thapar

Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal today inaugurated the long-delayed Rao Tula Ram (RTR) flyover, branching out of the Munirka flyover and ending before the Army Research and Referral Hospital near Subroto Park close to National Highway-8. The flyover will play a crucial role for the Delhi residents in reducing their frustration of commuting in the peak hour traffic in South Delhi and improve the connectivity to Gurgaon and IGI airport.

However, the 2.7 KM stretch flyover was marred with several delays. The project which was estimated to be completed in Rs 278 crores, eventually took Rs 310 crores for completion due to inordinate delays caused by resident complaints, planning permission delays and other factors. The RTR flyover project work was started in November 2014 and envisioned to be completed in exactly two years. But due to several delays, the project took almost 5 years for its completion.

One of the significant reasons for the project’s excessive delay was the opposition flagged by ‘prominent citizens’ who lived along the Outer Ring Road (Palam Marg stretch) of Delhi’s plush Vasant Vihar neighbourhood. They protested against the flyover citing that their lane’s width and navigation of fire tenders and ambulance will be impossible after the flyover’s construction.

In a letter written to the then Lieutenant Governor of Delhi, Tejendra Khanna, eminent journalist Karan Thapar argued that the construction of the flyover can become “the matter of life and death”, imploring the LG to not allow the reduction of the width of the service lane between houses 1 to 8 on the Palam Marg. Thapar claimed in the letter that he was speaking on behalf of the other residents as well which included- Arun Purie, the Editor-in-Chief of India Today and Aajtak, Harmala Gupta, daughter of late Gen. Harbaksh Singh and these all dignitaries endorsed and supported the request made by him in the letter.

Thapar argued in the letter that the current width of 6m of the service lane will be reduced to 4.5m after the construction of the RTR flyover, fire tenders won’t be able to navigate through the lane and if any of the houses caught fire, it will be a death trap for the residents there. However, the then Delhi fire chief AK Sharma put paid to the misgivings raised by Thapar. He rubbished the claims made by Thapar, asserting that the Fire Department has vehicles of all sizes and they don’t require to drive up to the house every time to douse the fire.

Even the locals of the area rubbished unfounded apprehensions raised by Thapar in his letter. Lashing out at Thapar, they said it is an attempt to hold the city to ransom for their personal benefit. One of the residents had then stated that the initial plan was to construct a wider and longer RTR flyover and laid the blame on people like Thapar for using their clout to truncate the flyover and reduce its width.

Refuting Thapar’s assertions, Gautam Vohra, president of Vasant Vihar RWA had revealed that Thapar didn’t approach him or other residents before writing a letter to the LG expressing our collective opposition to the flyover construction. Vohra had also said that prior to the incident, Thapar had shown little interest in addressing the water woes and other issues of greater public good before. The residents were of the opinion that Thapar vehemently opposed the flyover construction only because he perceived that his private space was about to be intruded.

West Bengal flares up again: Maternity home ransacked, bombs hurled, 50 crude bombs recovered in Bhatpara

The Bhatpara-Kankinara region in West Bengal’s North 24 Parganas district has been witnessing several incidents of violence since the last few days. A maternity home in the area was ransacked which caused a panic among the patients.

Bombs have been exploding in the area since Saturday evening, the Police said. Thus far, two people have been arrested in connection with the incident. The Police also recovered 50 crude bombs from an abandoned railways housing complex in the area on Monday morning. Miscreants also reportedly hurled bombs at the Bhatpara Municipality Matri Sadan (maternity home), creating panic and forcing patients to flee.

Many families were allegedly forced to flee the area fearing for their lives. Their houses were, thus, open to looting. At least 6 people suffered severe injuries due to the bombs that were hurled indiscriminately. The condition of one is said to be critical.

Ajoy Thakur, Deputy Commissioner (Zone 1) of the Barrackpore Police Commissionerate said, “Some miscreants hurled bombs in three places on Monday, but now the situation is under control.” Section 144 has been imposed in the area and the RAF is conducting patrols to maintain peace in the troubled region.

Clashes erupted near the Municipal Corporation as well after karyakartas of the BJP and Trinamool got involved in another spate of violence. Bombs were hurled and the Police was forced to conduct a lathicharge to bring the situation under control.


Only recently, two people died and three were injured in BJP-TMC clashes in the same area. Section 144 was imposed then as well and internet services were shut down. The clashes mark the continuation of the ever-deteriorating law and order situation in West Bengal under Mamata Banerjee. Political violence, mob violence and crimes have become rampant in the state.

How a neutral fan sees the World Cup final – The Greatest ODI of All Time

Sunday, July 14, was probably the most fabulous day in sports history. A Cricket World Cup final, Wimbledon final, and British Grand Prix were all happening at the same time. Never been that ‘back’ button used so frequently in a day for switching between the channels and the remote control became your friend, isn’t it?

Let’s switch to the Cricket channel. Go back to the moment when England required 24 runs off 12 balls, what do you see? Does it remind you of the famous World Cup semi-final between Australia and South Africa that happened in 1999? Were you nervous or relaxed as your team was not part of this exciting final which could lead to a mini heart-attack? Even as a neutral but as an adherent fan of cricket, you couldn’t just sit and relax and watch it as just another cricket game, right? The match ended as the best match ever in the history of one day international.

Did you feel sorry for New Zealand? Should the World Cup trophy be shared as New Zealand didn’t lose by runs or wickets but by the number of boundaries scored? What if Stokes’ bat didn’t come between the ball and stumps in the last over? What if the umpires had not made the error of that 1 run because of overthrow? Had New Zealand won the game then? You never know. In between all these ifs and buts, the World Cup final was tied twice, at the end of 100 overs and then at the end of Super Over. You can console yourself but can you console a dejected Martin Gutpill?

New Zealand?

In the end, with all the unfortunate things that happened during the final, I felt this was not New Zealand’s destiny to win the World Cup. How Martin Guptill took a review when he was plumbed in front of the wicket, a review that costed Ross Taylor’s wicket. Ross was not out, but the review was already lost with Guptill’s wicket. Santner didn’t try to hit the last ball of the New Zealand innings. Jason Roy got umpire’s call in his favor in the very first over of England’s innings. One of the most excellent boundary fielder, Trent Boult, crosses the boundary line after taking the catch of Ben Stokes in the penultimate over. That Guptill’s throw that cost them six runs, the most misfortunate event of the World Cup added with an umpiring error. Trent Boult’s last over, and the Super Over, their best bowler in the tournament, gave 29 runs in those two overs. How Nicholls allowed an extra run in super over because he couldn’t see the ball due to sun rays falling directly into his eyes.

England?

Moreover, it was always England’s World Cup. They played like a champion since their early exit in World Cup 2015. Scored most 300 plus scores than any team in the last four years, their batsmen scored the maximum hundreds in less than 70 balls in ODIs in that period. They entered the World Cup as the favorites, as the number one ODI team. Playing at the home turf, in front of the home crowd, won the world cup games against India, Australia, and New Zealand for the first time since 1992. They even scored the most 300 plus score in the edition, scored the highest total of the tournament. They had one of the best opening pairs, probably the best middle order of the competition and without a doubt their most significant World Cup bowling attack. As they say, ‘a proper team’ to win the title.

You feel sorry for Kane Williamson, Martin Guptill, Neesham and other Kiwis. They played like gentlemen and loved by everyone but unfortunately, this was not a Bollywood flick where only the nice guys win in the end.

This World Cup Final will stay with us forever, a life long memory. We will be telling the story of the best ODI match to the next generation, how we watched it LIVE and went crazy. How we love the Kiwis but didn’t hate England for winning the title.