Home Blog Page 6373

TMC terms the MHA advisory sent to the West Bengal government a deep-rooted conspiracy to grab power in the state

All India Trinamool Congress (TMC) in a letter addressed to Union Home Minister Amit Shah has objected to the advisory issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) to the government of West Bengal in view of the recent incidents of violence between the TMC and the BJP workers in Sandeshkhali, North Parganas district and has termed it a ‘deep-rooted-controversy’.

The party called the MHA advisory an ‘evil ploy to grab power’ in the opposition-ruled States. TMC General Secretary and West Bengal Minister Partha Chatterjee accused the government in the letter of drawing conclusions without verifying the ground reality or taking a report from the State government. “We have reason to believe that it is an evil ploy to grab power in States run by parties politically opposed to the BJP. Moreover, this is a deep-rooted conspiracy and game plan to malign the State government and capture the Bengal administration through undemocratic, unethical and unconstitutional means”, he said.

He urged the MHA to withdraw the advisory. “We, on behalf of the Trinamool Congress, lodge our strong objection to the advisory issued by the MHA and urge that the same be withdrawn forthwith”, said Chatterjee.

The Ministry of Home Affairs had expressed deep concern over the violence in the State in which five BJP workers had lost their lives. Chatterjee termed the MHA advisory an insult to the people of West Bengal. “In a democracy, the Centre and the States work in tandem. Instead of taking the State government into confidence and verifying the ground situation, the unilateral issue of an advisory by the MHA is an insult to the people of Bengal and an assault on the glory culture, and heritage of the State”, Chatterjee added.

The letter to the MHA was sent by the TMC on Sunday night claiming that the situation in the State is under control and that there was no failure on the part of the law enforcement agencies in the State.

We need to stop dividing crimes along the lines of ‘our victim’ and ‘their victim’

Some crimes shake the conscience of the nation: Like the one in Aligarh. Or the one in Kathua, Jammu.

Millions of Indians mourn such tragedies. But those vocal, be it on print, web or TV, view it from religious prisms: The divide is between Muslims-unsafe vs. Hindus- wronged. Politicians and media profit, not the nation.

The question today is: Can India afford to be divided along the communal lines? If it comes to pass, who should be held responsible? Could India as a nation then survive?

We have a prototype answer to all these questions. India was divided along the communal lines in 1947; Those who created divisions, in this case British, were responsible and India lost its’ eastern and western limbs in its quest for survival.

It all begins from those who set the narrative. British did it in decades leading to the independence: Assembly elections were held along the communal lines: Muslim candidate for Muslim constituency. Then began the chorus: what would happen to minority Muslims once we leave the Indian shores. Muslim League and Mohammad Ali Jinnah were thus armed to severe India of its limbs. The resultant tragedy of Partition has few parallels in human history.

India has survived another Partition thus far. But the same narrative is reappearing:  Muslims are insecure; their culture, language and religion is in danger; majority Hindus would be the oppressors.

If it were the British who fed this narrative in the pre-independence era, its media and break-India forces which is fanning the fire in our times. As oppressor Hindus were the theme before the Partition, so is the theme in our times.

Occasionally, the likes of Sadhvi Pragya and Giriraj Singh play into the hands of such forces. At times, “saffron terror” is cooked up like it nearly did in the tragic 26/11 in Mumbai. Lynchings become part of leitmotif to stoke fears of the oppressive Hindu majority.

Celebrities and cinestars jump in to serve their eternal desire of being in the news. Writers and scientists sign petitions in orchestrated campaigns. Data, like Lokniti-CSDN, survey how many Muslims and Christians have voted for BJP; Castes are divided into sub-castes and further sub-castes as Mayawatis, Akhilesh Yadavs and Lalu Prasads feed themselves fat on its harvests. Important magnets, like Western media and prized economists, all are part of the ecosystem which wants India to go up in flames.

Hindus and Muslims do have different languages and cultures. But both are Indians. And a majority do see themselves as Indians. The minority is Asaduddin Owaisi who incites with the call of Karbala or Niranjan Jyoti who divides with “ramzada” vs “haramzada” quip. Hang them out to dry. As you do with the despicable dozen English journalists and at least two English national dailies who are at the beck and call of divisive forces (read casteist, Left and dynastic parties); and foreign-funded NGOs

Let this be a checklist for Muslims:

(a) We have always been made to feel insecure even as more people greet us on Eid than those who abuse us.

(b) That there is no word as “minority” in the Indian constitution, all are Indians.

(c) That if “secularism” means denying a Muslim destitute woman (Shah Bano) her rights and reversing the judgment of the Supreme Court, then such secularism must be exposed.

(d) That if Hindu consolidation has happened around emotive Ram Temple issue, it was stoked by Congress and not BJP/RSS.

(e) That for every Akhlaq, Pehlu and Junaid, there are tens and dozens of Hindu victims at the hands of Muslims which go unreported.

(f) That if BJP doesn’t opt for a Muslim candidate, it doesn’t matter as long as the elected representative is fair to everyone in his constituency:  be it roads, electricity, toilets, gas, health, education, all is available to Muslims as it is to Hindus.

(g) That if Muslims are economically backward, it’s not because of Hindus but perhaps the reason lies in lack of scientific temper in Madarsa education; and less than fair freedom to women.

Let this be a checklist for Hindus:

(a) True, Indian history is distorted and neither Congress nor Left intellectuals have been fair to Hindus but it’s no excuse to substitute that anger against a common Muslim.

(b) True, a dozen English journalists and at least two English national dailies only report crimes against Muslims, often hoax, but they have been left thoroughly exposed in the last five years; their credibility in tatters thanks to a vigorous social media.

(c) Congress and Left, two parties who stoked fears in Muslims and Dalits, are today the outcasts of the Indian political system.

(d) That Hindu consolidation must not happen at the cost of Muslim alienation: that we don’t want new nations in Bengal or Kerala or Tamil Nadu and its’ attendant costs;

(e) That for every Zakir Naik and Burhan Wani, there is also a Muslim boatman who gives up his life but saves tourists from drowning in Jhelum in Srinagar.

We have a choice to make if want to be Hindus or Muslims or Indians. We ought to ask ourselves if we don’t mind another Partition and its horrific cost. We ought to boycott a Naseeruddin Shah or a Kamal Haasan; A Javed Akhtar or a Shabana Azmi; A Swara Bhaskar or a Prakash Raj who are selective in their outrage. The same ought to happen to a Niranjan Jyoti or Asaduddin Owaisi.  We ought to outcast a Shekhar Gupta or a Rajdeep Sardesai; a Sagarika Ghose or a Barkha Dutt if the only crime they see is against Muslims; We need to stop an Indian Express or The Hindu from entering into our drawing rooms if all they can see is a crime against a Dalit or a Muslim.

These are small forces. Pygmies in front of a nation of 1.30 billion. Should these handfuls be allowed to decide if we stay together or apart? Would you blame them if tens and thousands of us are butchered and raped in Partition 2.0?

Muslims need to be confident this is their India too. Before you blame others, you must ask if your education and matter of equality to women etc need a relook.  As Maulana Azad once addressed them:  You can’t be drowned and defeated by anyone else but yourself.  Don’t hide behind the cloak of “minority” and “secularism”.  Don’t seek privileges; you are no different than any other Indian. Rely on self. Those who speak for your safety and stoke your fears, couldn’t care less for you.

Bihar MLA’s assistant caught displaying objectionable behaviour while on a ‘study tour’ in Manipur

Officials working with Bihar lawmakers, who were on a study tour in Manipur, were caught displaying objectionable behaviour, dancing in an obscene manner with a lady, who appeared visibly uncomfortable around them.


The men can be seen dancing in a room, reportedly in Moreh, near the India-Myanmar border where the man repeatedly puts his hand on her shoulder and tries to hug her and get close to her. At some point in the video, he also offers her some beverage from a tin-can.

The incident reportedly took place on 1st June when Yaduvasn Kumar Yadav, RJD MLA, who heads the Committee on Internal Resource and Central Assistance of the Bihar Legislative Assembly along with other members of the panel visited Manipur to “take stock of the development program” under the Act East Policy of the NDA government.

Yadav was with four colleagues including the BJP’s Sachin Prasad Singh, Janata Dal United’s Raj Kumar Rai and another RJD (Rashtriya Janata Dal) leader Raja Pakar.

The video was first put out by Imphal Times which mentioned that this was not the first time such an incident has taken place in the North-East. As per Imphal Times, many VIPs and VVIPs consider the North-East their ‘sex destination’ but owing to lack of evidence, no action could be taken against them.

Although initial reports claimed that Yaduvasn Kumar Yadav was seen in the video, it has come to light that the person in the video is Vijay Kumar, an assistant of JDU MLA Raj Kumar Rai who was part of the delegation.

 

Note: This article has been updated with relevant information

Social activist AP Mohammad claims wider International conspiracy behind conversion of Malayalam writer Kamala Das to Islam

The religious conversion of famous Malayalam writer Kamala Das was a part of a wider global conspiracy to convert eminent personalities to Islam, says a social activist AP Mohammad, as per a Janam TV report.

Madhavikutty, popularly known as Kamala Das, converted to Islam when she was 65 years old. In 2009, she died, often expressing remorse over her decision to convert.

A prolific writer, Madhavikutty was a prominent Malayali personality, known for the brute honesty in her writings. She was admired for her openness and often criticised by the critiques for that very quality.

According to a report in Janam TV, social activist AP Mohammad, Madhavikutty’s close friend and confidante, Merrily Weisbord mentions in her book ‘The Love Queen of Malabar’ about the international conspiracy to convert her to Islam. Mohammad alleges that people were scared to speak about it in open. In addition to this, Mohammad states that the man behind Madhavikutty’s conversion was a prominent Muslim League leader orator and writer Abdussamad Samadhani, who purportedly received $10 lakh for converting Madhavikutty to Islam.

Merrily Weisbord claims in her book that Samadhani received the money from an organization based in Saudi Arabia for his service to convert the famous writer. Mohammad added that foreign money is being pumped into the state of Kerala for the singular purpose of converting people to Islam. Prominent personalities are being pursued for conversions because it provides credence to the conversion and more number of ordinary folks are motivated to embrace conversion, he says.

A writer par excellence, Madhavikutty wrote remarkable poems in English under the name Kamala Das. Her autobiographical work ‘Ente Katha’ was translated into English called ‘My Story’. She won many awards, testimonials during her lifetime such as Kendra Sahitya Academy Award, Kerala Sahitya Academy Award, Ezhuthachan Award, etc. She even made it to the shortlist for the Nobel Prize for Literature in the year 1984.

Kamala Das had converted into Islam at the age of 65. In an interview to Outlook India, she had stated that she no longer seeks freedom and sees Islam as a ‘rigid husband’. She had also added that the converted ‘Kamala Sorayya’ feels like ‘Allah’s handmaiden’ and like a ‘harem girl before her master.’

She had also added that the converted Kamala Sorayya would never write ‘nonsense’ like My Story and religion should not permit a woman to write something like that.

Controversial Tamil director Pa Ranjith makes abusive claims against Hinduism, calls Chola legend Raja Raja Chola a ‘land grabber’

Pa Ranjith, a controversial Tamil director, who claims to be a follower of Periyar and Ambedkar, has created a controversy by making abusive remarks not only against Hinduism but also against one of the greatest rulers of the country, Raja Raja Chola.

A video has gone viral on social media where Pa Ranjith, who often indulges in anti-Hindu and anti-upper caste narrative through in his films, can be heard making vicious Hinduphobic statements. In his speech, he asserts that the government should grab the lands given to mutts and should re-distribute them to Dalits. He further tries to spew venom by attempting to alienate Dalits from being Hindus and alleged that Hindus had grabbed land from Dalits.


Mocking the Hindus and their gods, Pa Ranjith arrogantly went on to make intimidating statements saying that if cows are considered to be the god of the Hindus, then he is the one who eats their god.


Pa Ranjith further goes on to foul mouth against one of the greatest emperors of Chola dynasty, Raja Raja Chola. Calling the Raja Raja Chola’s rule as the dark times of the era, Ranjith further peddles false narrative claiming that caste oppression was started during the time of Raja Raja Chola.


In a desperate attempt to gain some fame, Pa Ranjith has deliberately chosen to ignore the cultural and political accomplishments of the great Chola empire, especially Raja Raja Chola and instead resorted to cheap abuses against Hinduism and the Chola Empire.

Raja Raja Chola is one of the greatest emperors of the medieval era. Being a great patron of Shaivism, he constructed the great Raja Rajeshwar temple also known as the Brihadeeswarar temple at Tanjore, which is now a UNESCO World Heritage Site.

Raja Raja Chola was the man behind the resurgence of the Cholas not only in the south but also in regions far beyond Indian territories during the 11th century. The Cholas during the rule of Raja Raja Chola developed links all over south India. They had even brought Srilanka, South- East Asia and even China under the network of their trade.

It is highly disturbing that self-proclaimed Ambedkarites and Periyarites like Pa Ranjith are freely allowed to hate monger and indulge in divisive politics, who otherwise have no sense of the history or respect for their own culture.

Media focusing on Aligarh child murder case on the instructions of their ‘father figure’ because accused are Muslims: Asaduddin Owaisi

Controversial politician Asaduddin Owaisi, known for his searing brand of politics, today shockingly gave a communal flair to the tragedy of the murder of a 2.5-year-old minor girl in Aligarh. Owaisi asserted that the media’s excessive coverage of the Aligarh murder incident was on the instructions of their ‘father figure’ to tarnish the image of the Muslims. The comments were essentially made in reference to the accused in the Aligarh murder case who are all Muslims.

Owaisi said, “I condemn the Aligarh incident, I condemn the SR Nagar incident. I also condemn the Gorakhpur rape incident. That Dalit girl is our daughter. I condemn the rape and murder of a 5-year-old girl in Indore. I condemn whatever happened in Gaya, Bihar. When a human becomes a demon, he starts behaving in this manner. But we have no hopes from our media. They will not show all these incidents. Because their father-figure told them to portray a community in a bad light.’

Owaisi slammed the media for not placing the same importance to other atrocities happening in the country as they are to the Aligarh murder. In an apparent reference to PM Modi, Owaisi alleged that the media is not showing all the other incidents and only concentrating on Aligarh murder because their ‘father figure’ had asked them to show a particular community in a bad light. The 4 accused arrested so far in the Aligarh murder case are all Muslims.

Tina (name changed), resident of Tappal, Aligarh district, Uttar Pradesh, was choked to death by Zahid and Aslam over an argument with her family regarding a small loan amount of Rs 10000. The principal accused, Zahid had brutally strangled Tina with a dupatta (scarf) and hid the body in his house in a straw bag. After three days when the corpse started emitting a foul odour, Zahid threw Tina’s body in a pile of trash. Tina’s body was completely decomposed with her eyes gouged out.

Tina’s mother had already alleged that Aslam, the co-accused in Tina’s murder had earlier raped his own daughter, following which Aslam’s wife had fled to her parent’s home with her daughter.

In addition, the police have made two more arrests in the case on Saturday, including the wife of Zahid and his younger brother. So far, 4 arrests have been made in the case. A Special Investigation Team (SIT) comprising of 6 members has been instituted and asked to submit their probe report within 3 weeks.

While the first ‘witch’ was executed today in 1692, the puritan spirit that drove the Salem Witch Trials executions is well alive and thriving

Throughout its history, Monotheism has had a strange way of manifesting itself in the most twisted of ways. The entire concept is dependent on the existence of a ‘Great Other’ who constantly seeks to undermine the authority of the God-head.

In Christianity, the ‘Great Evil’ is called Satan or the Devil. Although the word ‘Devil’ is also used to describe demons in general, when ‘the’ is used before it, it only refers to Satan unless stated otherwise specifically.

Ever since Monotheism gained prominence, the adherents have attempted to wipe out the worship of all others Gods, save their own, terming the Divine as a manifestation of the Great Other. In the process, genocides have been committed, innocents have been tortured and the pious have been put to death on charges of the most heinous crime in Monotheism: Worshipping False Gods.

Monotheists also live in a constant state of paranoia, that the Great Other is always in our midst working to implement his heinous designs and corrupt humanity to turn us away from God. The paranoia manifests itself frequently and more often than not, innocents lose their lives as a consequence.

One of the most heinous manifestations of this paranoia in history was the Salem Witch Trials. Over the years, the trials gained great infamy for the manner in which the accused were held guilty and have now been popularized in pop-culture as one of the great evils of religion itself.

June the 10th has special significance in this regard as it was on this day all the way back in 1692 that the first victim of the trials was executed by hanging. Bridget Bishop was convicted of being a Witch as she was believed to live an ‘immoral lifestyle’ which was not consistent with the staunch Puritan norms that prevailed during that era. She also wore black attire and odd costumes, contrary to the mandates of the Puritan code. All these factors combined led to her execution.

The accusations against were quite fanciful, to put it mildly. In his book ‘Wonders of the Invisible World, Cotton Mather describes the allegations against her. According to some people, an apparition in the shape of Bishop would bite, pinch or choke them. Others claimed that the apparition threatened to drown them if they did not write their names in a certain book. During the hearing, a jury of women found a third nipple on her body, considered a sure sign of witchcraft, yet upon a second examination, the third nipple was not found. According to Mather, “there was little occasion to prove the witchcraft, it being evident and notorious to all beholders.”

For those with modern sensibilities, the allegations appear quite preposterous. However, ‘Spectral Evidence’ played a major role in convictions. It refers to the testimony of the allegedly afflicted that they saw an apparition in the shape of the person who was afflicting them. There were other ‘evidence’ presented as well, however, in all of them, ‘Spectral Evidence’ featured prominently.

Bridget Bishop was not the only one who fell victim to what has been referred to as a ‘mass hysteria’. 19 people were executed in total, one of them was executed because he refused to enter a formal plea. Giles Corey, an 81-year-old farmer, refused to enter a plea when he came to trial in September, the same year. The judges then sentenced him to death through an archaic form of punishment even in those days, the peine forte et dure, where stones were piled on his chest until he could no longer breathe. Contrary to popular beliefs, not only women were found guilty. Of the 19 executed, 5 were men.

The Salem Witch Trials are often described as a case of ‘mass hysteria’ but more accurately, it was an amalgamation of a myriad of political, religious, social and local factors. It wasn’t mere ‘hysteria’ either, some of the accusations were made due to rather petty personal squabbles and often motivated by vendetta. Therefore, to reduce the vast complexity of the events as mere hysteria is a great disservice to the victims. The conditions necessary for such a tragedy were very much in place and some people took advantage of it to settle personal scores.

An important thing to note here is that the Salem Witch Trails may have occurred centuries ago, however, the Puritan spirit that drove the persecution of the innocent is still very much alive. The manner of trials may have changed, the forms of punishment may have been altered but to this day, it continues to occur.

The first person that comes to mind is James Watson, the famed American molecular biologist and geneticist who proposed the double-helix structure of the DNA along with Francis Crick. In an interview with The Sunday Times in 2007, Watson said that he was “inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa” because “all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours – whereas all the testing says not really”. He said there was a natural desire that all human beings should be equal but “people who have to deal with black employees find this not true”.

His opinions were reflected in another book that was published around the same time. He opined, “There is no firm reason to anticipate that the intellectual capacities of peoples geographically separated in their evolution should prove to have evolved identically. Our wanting to reserve equal powers of reason as some universal heritage of humanity will not be enough to make it so.”

As a consequence of his comments, Watson was stripped of his titles and ostracized from the ‘scientific community’. Circumstances were so dire that he had to sell his Nobel award. He issued an apology after severe condemnations and the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (CSHL) allowed him to retain an honorary position at the institution. In 2019, however, given an opportunity to take back his comments, Watson refused to do so.

In a PBS documentary, Watson said, “I would like for them to have changed, that there be new knowledge that says that your nurture is much more important than nature. But I haven’t seen any knowledge. And there’s a difference on the average between blacks and whites on I.Q. tests. I would say the difference is, it’s genetic.’’

Watson does admit that he wishes it were not so. Watson says,  “It’s awful, just like it’s awful for schizophrenics. If the difference exists, we have to ask ourselves, how can we try and make it better?” It’s pertinent to note that his own son was diagnosed with Schizophrenia in his teens. After his recent comments, the CSHL cut remaining ties with him. His son was unhappy, understandably so, but his comments were seen as sufficient reason for the severe consequences.

Amusingly enough, one would think that one of the most celebrated geneticists of our times would have greater knowledge about genetics than most of the ‘scientific community’. It’s also important to note that he was making a scientific point. His case reminds one of Christian crucification of heretics.

If IQ science is wrong, then the whole project ought to be scrapped entirely. Then why is it so that it is still prevalent and used by a great many institutions and taught in psychology departments across the world? Either it’s completely bogus or it is not, one cannot have both ways. Even more amusingly, Jordan Peterson, who has great respectability across all sections barring the Alt-Right and the Far Left, has echoed Watson’s opinions on several occasions without attracting the severe condemnation that the geneticist did.

Peterson continues to remain an esteemed Clinical Psychologist and is invited regularly in podcasts and for interviews where he is given the opportunity to defend his opinions at great length. He is seen as an inspirational figure. He has said that if anything in Social Science was authentic, then it was the concept of IQ. Granted that he has dealt with the question far more clinically and eloquently and humanely but the fact remains, he too agrees with Watson’s opinions. Of course, he doesn’t base it on Genetics like Watson does but then, who do you trust more when it comes to Genetics? An esteemed psychologist or an esteemed geneticist?

The question is not whether Watson and Peterson are right or wrong but whether Watson was deserving of the treatment he received? Peterson, quite clearly, hasn’t suffered any consequences at all. Then why Watson, one of the greatest geneticists to have ever lived?

There are other victims of this Puritan spirit of persecution as well. The manner in which Justice Kavanaugh was dragged through the mud in the USA for sheer politics was deplorable as well. An allegation of rape was levelled against him, the alleged victim did not remember when it occurred, where it occurred or the manner in which it occurred. The witnesses she claimed would corroborate her story denied having remembered anything close to what she was describing.

Soon after, other allegations surfaced as well and those were found to be complete and utter fabrications made by people of questionable character to slander Kavanaugh’s reputation. Needless to say, the allegations that were made against Kavanaugh would not even be considered by any Court in the USA. However, that did not prevent anyone from calling him a rapist, a sexual predator and a threat to women. This was akin to the ‘Spectral Evidence’ in the Salem Witch Trials. A man of impeccable reputation who has risen to where he is today was slandered merely for political objectives. This was not ‘mass hysteria’, this was the manifestation of the vile Puritan spirit of persecuting heretics.

Apart from these individual instances, we see a broader phenomenon at work as well. Anyone who disagrees with popular notions of Feminism and Liberalism is labelled a fascist, a sexist, a racist and attempts are made to destroy his or her career. We see it in the West and we see it here in India as well.

Consider the manner in which Alex Jones was deplatformed by social media organizations. He is a funny figure, sure. But the conspiracy theories he peddled were rather harmless. For certain, they were not anywhere close to being as harmful as the Russian Collusion delusion peddled by nearly every mainstream media outlet. They were certainly not as harmful of the Weapons of Mass Destruction conspiracy theory peddled by the US government and endorsed by every section of mainstream media to justify the Iraq War.

These sentiments have real-life violent consequences as well. Numerous Trump supporters were attacked viciously by Leftists causing immense them great injury. Due to this Puritan spirit of the Left, children as young as seven are being given puberty blockers, that is, hormones which prevent the normal growth of children through their adolescence into childhood without anyone with significant power raising a hue and cry over it. In the United Kingdom, authorities covered up the string of rapes of children by Muslim grooming gangs because they were too scared of being called racists. these violent delights do have violent ends.

Modernity has conclusively demonstrated that there are no more witches in this world to persecute. Therefore, the Puritans of the 21st century are engaging themselves in a bid to rid the world of racists, sexists, homophobes and xenophobes through any means necessary. In the aftermath of the Salem Witch Trials, there was great regret among the people regarding how things turned out. And the victims were exonerated of their guilt and given due honour. One can only hope that after this phase of Puritan rage is over, we will see a similar reckoning.

It is also important to note that such phenomena are only observed in the West while in India and other Asian non-monotheistic countries, it is not observed. The sole reason for it is that polytheistic cultures do not provide for the Puritan spirit necessary for the manifestation of such evil. There are on and off cases of ‘witches’ being lynched and put to death, sure, but the organized effort to execute them through the organized arms of the state is something that is never witnessed. And the people who do commit such atrocities are always booked under the law and awarded due punishment.

Shekhar Gupta’s The Print pronounces punishment for the convicted in Kathua case even before the court does

On Monday, a Pathankot special court delivered a judgement to convict six out of the seven accused in the heinous rape and killing of 8-year old girl in Kathua of Jammu and Kashmir.

Judge Tejvinder Singh of the special court pronouncing verdict in Kathua Rape case convicted the six out of the total seven accused including four policemen. However, the court delayed the announcement of the sentence until 2 PM on Monday afternoon.

Interestingly, leftist news portal The Print, owned by controversial journalist and Editor Guild’s chief Shekhar Gupta declared the quantum of sentence to all the seven accused leaving many people in confusion. In one of its reports, which is now edited, the Print proclaimed the judgement even before the honourable court did.

In a report, it claimed that all the seven accused in Kathua rape and murder case were sentenced to life imprisonment. The Print has also disregarded facts by claiming that all the seven have been sentenced to life imprisonment despite the fact that only six accused have been convicted in the case. Main accused Sanjhi Ram’s son Vishal Jangotra was acquitted by the court.

The court is yet to deliver the sentence and has scheduled to do so at 2 PM this afternoon.

The Print report which announces the quantum of sentence to the convicts in Kathua rape case even before the courts.

It is rather interesting to know whether the Print report which declared the judgement prior to the courts was just a routine editorial oversight or was it a case of them just letting the cat out of their bag by declaring a piece of information sourced from deep within the judiciary.

As their blunder was caught again, the Print team was quick enough to edit some information in the article with omitting out the ‘quantum of the sentence’ information from their earlier report.

“This report has been updated to correct the number of accused held guilty. It also incorrectly stated that the accused were sentenced to life term. The error is regretted,” stated the Print in its edited article.

AltNews co-founder tried to discredit OpIndia’s report on Vishal Jangotra being framed, netizens remind him of his propaganda

The Kathua verdict is out and the Special Court in Pathankot has convicted six persons and Vishal Jangotra, son of the main accused is acquitted. The sentence will be pronounced later in the day today. In May last year, OpIndia had reported how the fresh details which had emerged in the gruesome Kathua rape and murder case revealed that Jangotra was actually present in Muzaffarnagar on the day and at a time when the police charge sheet accuses him to be present in Kathua.

Vishal’s family had been claiming since the beginning of the case that the crime branch investigations are botched up and Vishal was never present during the crime period. This threw a shadow of doubt on the charge sheet filed by the Jammu crime branch team which was already under scrutiny as many reports claimed that it contained factual discrepancies.

However, co-founder of self-proclaimed fact-checker website AltNews, which recently whitewashed crimes of Aslam, a prime accused in the murder and probable rape of a three-year-old Tina (name changed) in Aligarh, was very quick to dismiss and discredit OpIndia’s reportage.


He juxtaposed OpIndia’s report on Vishal next to an opinion piece by OpIndia Editor Nupur J Sharma where she had exposed the hypocrisy of the Leftists on feminism and how they ‘protect’ one of their own when it comes to allegations of sexual harassment and exploitation. Zubair had tried to imply how OpIndia was trying to ‘protect’ Jangotra by writing a report questioning Jammu Crime Branch’s charge-sheet which had glaring loopholes.

Now that Jangotra has been acquitted by the Special Court, netizens took to Twitter to remind the co-founder of ‘fact-checking’ website of his own propaganda and hypocrisy.


Twitterati even reminded him how he had pronounced judgement even before the trial.


Twitter users even asked him to fact-check himself before he issues judgements onto others.


This is not the first time AltNews co-founder has been found sharing information on social media which is factually incorrect. Following the ghastly terror attack in Sri Lanka on Easter Sunday by radical Islamists, he was found shielding the Islamists. Oh, and AltNews did not fact-check their own co-founder on the Sri Lanka bombings tweets.

That’s AltNews for you.

BJP was in opposition for decades, but BJP supporters always cheered for India

Yesterday, I found this screenshot doing the rounds on Twitter.

Untitled.png

If you have been on social media, you would know that such sentiments are not uncommon. The above is just an example of a much larger phenomenon. Nothing personal.

“Warmongering” Indian cricket team? Seriously? It is clear that such people have active imaginations are out of a touch of reality. Surely, this is a symptom that they are deeply disturbed and unhappy on the inside. This hatred, where is it coming from?

The elite liberal consensus has always had contempt for common Indians. Narendra Modi became the focal point of their hatred. And as his political star shone brighter and brighter, liberals were driven further and further over the edge.

They went from hating Modi to hating Hindus to hating India.

With the General Election victory, the BJP is set to get a hold of the establishment (which is different from holding power). As the BJP enters its second successive term in office with a full majority of its own, there is real worry that BJP supporters might slowly become the very thing they despise. They might become like liberals.

It is to address such worries that one must identify fundamental differences between BJP supporters and the elite liberals who ruled before them.

The simplest test lies in how BJP supporters see the country. The BJP was out cold and in the opposition for decades, but do you know of one BJP supporter who wanted India to lose a cricket match to Pakistan because of that?

You might ask: what does BJP being in power have to do with cheering for India in cricket? You would be right. It’s always natural to support one’s country in the international sporting arena. It comes automatically to everyone.

Except we are finding out now that it is not natural and it does not apply to everybody. It is possible to hate the ruling party so much that you cannot even tolerate the idea of the Indian team winning a cricket game.

Remember this?

Untitled.png

Remember how ‘intellectual’ Ashis Nandy was worried that India winning the World Cup might intensify nationalism in India?

Do you remember a BJP supporter thinking this way in all the decades that the BJP was out of power?

Therein lies the difference.

Let’s take something much more serious than cricket. Who remembers the Pathankot terrorist attack in 2015? It was the first major terror attack during PM Modi’s tenure outside of Jammu and Kashmir. As the nation went into mourning, a certain group of liberals appeared thrilled, because they hoped Modi would lose face.

The pattern continued after the terror attack in Uri, in which 19 of our jawans lost their lives. Ironically, the ‘celebrations’ on the left ended abruptly after the Indian Army carried out surgical strikes across the Line of Control. After that, liberals became eager mouthpieces for enemy propaganda, giving strength to every rumour floated by the Pakistani side to cast doubt on the strikes.

But what really brought out the worst of Indian ‘liberalism’ was their response to Pulwama. Supposedly respectable liberals from many walks of life; public intellectuals, journalists working for top media houses, executives of MNCs, students, etc came forward with some of the most despicable views ever. Some equated the actions of the Indian Army in Kashmir with those of terrorists. Other spread lies about Indian Army raping and murdering innocent people. Some of them went all the way and openly celebrated the Pulwama attack by saying “How’s the Jaish?”

Do you remember any BJP supporter ever speaking about the 26/11 attacks like that?

But in the aftermath of Pulwama, liberals went low. Very low. One media outlet actually boasted a report in which they described how they had called up the grieving relatives of the dead to find out the caste of the fallen soldiers! Because, you know, elections were coming. And liberals knew that only caste consolidation could stop Modi. So, if you lost your loved ones to a terrorist attack, you can expect a call from a liberal journalist asking they belonged to one of the castes that the opposition has identified as politically useful for votebank purposes.

It’s hard to go lower than that.

Again, our response to terror should be something that is above our domestic party politics. When 44 of our jawans are killed by terrorists, we are all on Team India.

Shockingly, not everyone feels the same way.

Perhaps it goes to the heart of how the two sides see the nation. Perhaps for liberals, the country is worth only what they can pillage, plunder and strip mine it for. When India stops being the hen that lays golden eggs for them, does India become a thorn in their flesh?

Be it on the battlefield or the cricket field.

You might have noticed that the usual suspects are somewhat muted during this World Cup. I doubt that they have changed their mind. More likely they realize that standing with the Tukde Tukde gang was a PR disaster of epic proportions for them. And they don’t want to be seen going down that way again. It’s not good for their business… err…I mean their politics.

For BJP supporters, I will say this: there is never a perfect world. Power brings with it many vices. But as long as you remember that the nation is above everything else, you’ll do just fine.