Home Blog Page 101

From Ram Mandir opposition to terror apologism: Inside the radical playbook of COLLECTIVE India as Urban Naxals use ‘pollution’ as a ruse to stage pro-Naxal protests

 On 24th November, leftist ‘student’ groups protesting against air pollution pepper sprayed police officials as the latter tried to stop them. The visuals of police stopping the ‘anti-pollution’ protestors surfaced on social media.

In no time, democracy, constitution, idea of India and whatnot came under threat from the usual ‘fascists’. However, it turned out that the leftist agitators-for-life were only using air pollution as a pretext for commemorating one of India’s most wanted Naxals, Madvi Hidma, who was recently killed in an anti-Naxal operation. They raised ‘Tum Kitne Hidma Maaroge, Har Ghar Se Hidma Niklega’ slogans similar to those raised by the infamous ‘Azadi’ gang for terrorist Afzal Guru.

The pro-Naxal protests were organised by Bhagat Singh Chhatra Ekta Manch (bsCEM). This group is a part of a Campaign Against State Repression (CASR) which is a collective of 38 left-leaning organisations.

Among these is a self-declared revolutionary student-youth organisation COLLECTIVE India.

COLLECTIVE India: A socialist student-youth movement or an anti-India outfit?

Founded in 2021, COLLECTIVE claims to draw inspiration from martyr Bhagat Singh but is indulged in glorifying those involved in anti-India activities. On surface, COLLECTIVE engages in on-campus activism, opposing what it calls ‘far-right fascist forces’. However, OpIndia’s deep dive into COLLECTIVE’s activities reveal that this leftist student-youth group is a part of a radical Left-Naxal ecosystem and is involved in anti-Hindu activities.

According to COLLECTIVE, India today is under the “ascendancy of far-Right fascist forces”, empowered by neo-liberal capitalism, global finance, and supposedly anti-scientific, anti-secular tendencies. The organisation casts the RSS and BJP as central villains, accuses the state of “criminalising every voice of dissent”, and repeatedly frames modern governance as a slide into authoritarianism. Every policy from NEP to economic reforms is portrayed as a corporate conspiracy backed by imperialist interests.

The group situates students not as learners but as frontline participants in a global anti-capitalist struggle. It romanticises historical uprisings, glorifies Naxalbari, and constantly invokes revolutionaries from Bhagat Singh to Latin American agitators. Education, in its view, is merely another “apparatus of dominant hegemony” that must be resisted, overturned and repurposed towards class struggle.

COLLECTIVE blames ‘Hindutva terrorists’ for Gauri Lankesh murder

In its social media posts remembering controversial ‘journalist’ Gauri Lankesh, COLLECTIVE blamed ‘Hindutva terrorists’ for her murder. “Revolutionary salutes to people’s journalist #GauriLankesh, martyred by Hindutva Terrorists on this day in 2017. Gauri’s legacy lives on and inspires us to continue to strengthen our struggle against communal and fascist forces,” COLLECTIVE Delhi wrote in one its Instagram posts remembering Lankesh.

COLLECTIVE equates Anti-Hindu Delhi Riots mastermind Umar Khalid with martyr Khudiram Bose

Besides Gauri Lankesh, COLLECTIVE also supports and demands release of Umar Khalid who is accused of masterminding the 2020 anti-Hindu Delhi Riots. In a social media post published in August this year, COLLECTIVE equated ‘Comrade’ Umar Khalid with martyr Khudiram Bose and cried hoarse over Khalid being incarcerated for more than 1,800 days without trial. The leftist outfit attempted to draw a false equivalence between the British Colonial government and the democratically elected Modi government to glorify Umar Khalid.

Contrary to the false narrative peddled by Islamo-leftists to garner support and sympathy for Umar Khalid, OpIndia has reported earlier that out of the 14 adjournments in 2023 and 2024, 7 delays and adjournments were sought by Umar Khalid himself. It therefore becomes evident that the withdrawal was certainly not because of the famed “delay” in hearing. While the Islamo-leftist ecosystem continues to cry ‘injustice’, it is the alleged failed forum shopping attempts of the accused’s lawyer that has Khalid rotting in jail for so long.

In fact, former Chief Justice of India, DY Chandrachud had also said earlier this year that the real problem lies in the mindset of some lawyers and political groups who want their cases heard only by certain judges. Highlighting what OpIndia has reported multiple times, the former CJI said that court records showed that Khalid’s legal team, led by Sibal, had sought at least seven adjournments before finally withdrawing the bail plea in February 2024, citing “a change in circumstances.”

Ammunition found at pro-Pakistan news outlet Kashmir Times’s office, but COLLECTIVE accuses RSS-BJP ‘regime’ of targeting ‘independent media’

Recently, COLLECTIVE came out in support of Kashmir Times after its office was raided. Police had recovered ammunition from the office. “Kashmir Times, a leading newspaper in the valley, has been forced to shut its print circulation after the abrogation of Article 370. Despite this unofficial ban, the State Investigation Agency has raided its office, seized equipment and filed a FIR against editor Anuradha Bhasin,” the COLLECTIVE wrote.

OpIndia reported how Anuradha Bhasin, the executive editor of the Kashmiri newspaper under scanner, has been involved anti-India activities and has connections with Pakistan’s ISI. Bhasin’s father and veteran journalist Ved Bhasin was also a staunch supporter of the ISI’s anti-India operations in Kashmir. He blatantly supported the idea of Kashmir’s separation from India.  Ved Bhasin also had links with the separatist outfit Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front (JKLF). He also sympathised with JKLF founder Maqbool Bhat.

The Bhasin father-daughter duo have also been part of several ISI-sponsored conferences organised by ISI mole Ghulam Nabi Fai and his Kashmir American Council (KAC). Fai was convicted and jailed for three years for using ISI funds to influence the US position in favour of Pakistan about Jammu and Kashmir. Even after Fai’s conviction, Anuradha Bhasin defended him and the Pakistani ISI, which has orchestrated numerous terror attacks in India and is dedicated to undermining India security and territorial integrity.

Bhasin also sympathises with 2001 Parliament Attack convicted terrorist Afzal Guru. In her books and articles, Bhasin also painted the Indian security forces as oppressors killing Kashmiri children and youth.

In the same Instagram post, COLLECTIVE Delhi also hailed ‘award-winning’ reporter Irfan Mehraj of ‘Two Circles’, saying that he languishes in jail for over 2 years. It, however, did not mention that Irfan Mehraj was not arrested for his ‘award-winning journalism’ but for alleged involvement in a terror funding case.

Mehraj was closely associated with ‘activist’ Khurram Parvez and a member of the Jammu and Kashmir Coalition of Civil Societies (JKCCS). The NIA had said that the JKCCS was funding terror activities in the valley and had also been in the propagation of secessionist agenda in the Valley under the garb of protection of human rights. In a Facebook post from June 2020, Irfan Mehraj was seen in awe of controversial activist Khurram Parvez. “You keep inspiring us every day,” he wrote.

COLLECTIVE’s pro-Palestine activism

Predictably, COLLECTIVE not only backs anti-India Islamist elements in but also indulged in pro-Palestine activism. In one such protest in Delhi this July, Harsh Mander and many COLLECTIVE members staged a pro-Palestine protest.

In June, ‘comrades’ of COLLECTIVE held a protest outside Israeli Embassy in Delhi. The leftist outfit, however, did not ever condemn the Hamas onslaught against Israeli civilians in October 2023.

It must be noted that  Harsh Mander  is infamous for his anti-India activities. In May this year, he tried to negotiate with the government on behalf of Naxals who are being neutralised under Operation Kagar. During anti-CAA protests, he was seen inciting Muslims against the central government using lies and fake information about the Citizen (Amendment) Act. In 2023, Ministry of Home Affairs had recommended inquiry against his NGO and in 2024, Central Bureau of Investigation had raided premises linked to him in FCRA violation case.

COLLECTIVE against Ayodhya Ram Mandir

On 22nd January 2024, the day when Ram Lalla Pran Pratishtha took place at Ram Mandir, Ayodhya, COLLECTIVE wrote on X, “BJP-RSS terrorism unleashed across India”.

COLLECTIVE supports Rejaz Sydeek and Ali Khan Mahmudabad who condemned Operation Sindoor against Pakistani terror establishments

In May this year, when Indian stood rock solid with the India Armed Forces as the latter conducted Operation Sindoor dismantling terror establishments and Islamic terrorists inside Pakistan, some pro-Pakistan voices rose up in India. Two such were Rejaz Sydeek and Ali Khan Mahmudabad.

It must be recalled that 26-year-old pro-Maoist student ‘activist’ from Kerala, Rejaz M Sheeba Sydeek was arrested in Nagpur on 7th May, following his post against Operation Sindoor on Instagram. Sydeek was booked under the UAPA.

Sydeek, on his Instagram account, had condemned Operation Sindoor carried out by Indian Armed Forces against terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan Occupied Jammu & Kashmir. Along with that, he was criticizing operations against Naxalites, the First Information Report registered at Lakadganj police station in the city read. He was also reportedly brandishing firearms as well in the video.

Whitewashing Sydeek’s outrageous remarks, COLLECTIVE wrote, “…Comrade Rejaz had simply criticised the recent escalation of tensions between India and Pakistan and called for peace. This is a clear targeting for raising one’s voice critically against the regime.”

Meanwhile, Ali Khan Mahmudabad, a professor at Haryana’s Ashoka University,  was arrested for making derogatory remarks against women officers in the armed forces and for promoting communal disharmony. Later, the Supreme Court granted him bail but did not halt investigation. It ordered a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to continue probe.

Extending support to Mahmudabad, COLLECTIVE wrote, “…This is nothing but the right wing machinery working to suppress any and all voices of dissent. Prof Mahmudabad has not made communal remarks, rather he raised questions about the various oppressions that minorities are facing in this regime. Such questions are no longer allowed and are easily deemed as criminal.”

Delhi anti-Hindu riots accused Gulfisha Fatima is a ‘political prisoner’ for COLLECTIVE

The Delhi-based leftist student-youth group has a knack for supporting not only Naxal terrorists and Islamist ‘intellectuals’ but also rioters. Calling for revoking the “draconian” UAPA law, the COLLECTIVE, earlier this year lamented that Delhi Riots accused Gulfisha Fatima is in jail for the last five years “without any evidence or trial”.

It must be recalled that Gulfisha Fatima’s bail application was denied by the court in September this year. Contrary to the COLLECTIVE’s claims, Fatima is no political prisoner but is accused of gathering around 300 women at Seelampur, Jafrabad and mobilising them to block the road at Jafrabad Metro Station during the Delhi riots in 2020. She is accused of inciting them to attack the police using chilli powder, stones, sticks and other dangerous articles, which were allegedly provided by Fatima and the co-accused persons.

On directions of Umar Khalid, another ‘hero’ for COLLETIVE, Gulfisha Fatima stockpiled red chilli powder, acid, bottles, and sticks, which were to be used when the planned riots begin. The prosecution also alleged that Fatima, along with co-accused persons, organized violent protests against the CAA/NRC and, on 22nd February 2020 blocked the road under the Jafrabad Metro Station after instigated women to attack the Police. She was arrested by Jafrabad Police in this case. She is also accused of involvement in receiving funds from the co-accused AAP councillor at that time, Tahir Hussain, for utilizing them in the riots. The defence, however, contended that the allegations of Tahir Hussain giving money to Fatima for illegal purposes is “uncorroborated”.

COLLECTIVE glorifies Naxalite GN Saibaba

Unsurprisingly, the Marxist student group has expressed support and solidarity for convicted Naxal ideologue GN Saibaba. In one such social media posts published last December, COLLECTIVE wrote, “DU students organised a memorial for professor GN Saibaba at Arts Faculty today.
We must remember his revolutionary legacy and struggle for people’s movements. Rise in rage against the institutional murder of GN Saibaba and continue the struggle against UAPA and neo-liberal fascism! Red Salute to Comrade GN Saibaba!”

G N Saibaba, a professor of English in Ram Lal Anand College of the Delhi University, was sentenced to life imprisonment by a Gadchiroli sessions court in 2017 for waging war against India for his Maoist links and involvement in anti-national activities. He was convicted under sections 13, 18, 20, 38 and 39 of the UAPA.

G N Saibaba was first arrested in May 2014 on charges of being a member of the banned CPI-Maoists plus providing logistics and carrying out recruitment for them. He was then provided bail for three months on 30th June 2015 in view of his worsening health. He was given bail again in August 2016, this time by the Supreme Court against the wishes of the Maharashtra Government, which thought freeing Saibaba would render him free to propagate his views and brainwash students.

COLLECTIVE supported anti-India Arundhati Roy and Sheikh Showkat Hussain

In June 2024, when the Delhi Lieutenant Governor Vinai Kumar Saxena granted permission to prosecute author Arundhati Roy under the stringent Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) for her provocative speech at a 2010 event, COLLECTIVE issued a statement whitewashing Roy’s controversial activities and also villainised the BJP and RSS.

Notably, in the 2010 event, alongside Arundhati Roy, Sheikh Showkat Hussain and late Hurriyat leader Syed Ali Shah Geelani, SAR Geelani (the anchor of the conference and a prime accused in the Parliament attack case), and Varavara Rao were also present.

It was alleged that Geelani and Arundhati Roy strongly asserted that Kashmir was never part of India, was forcibly occupied by the Indian Armed Forces, and that every effort should be made for the independence of Jammu and Kashmir from India. 

COLLECTIVE’s statement makes it clear that the leftist student-youth group not only supports the likes of Roy but also support Kashmir’s separation from India.

COLLECTIVE’s heart bleeds for Professor Ratan Lal who insulted Lord Mahadev

Communists in India harbour exclusive disdain for Hindus and their faith. COLLECTIVE, a group driven by the same ideology is, expectedly, not different. From eulogising EV Ramaswamy Naicker or Periyar, who led mobs attacking Brahmins and cutting their sacred Janeu/Poonool, in addition to desecrating Hindu temples and idols, running fake ‘Brahminical patriarchy’ propaganda, to opposing construction of Ayodhya Ram Mandir, Collective has been pushing anti-Hindu agenda through its activism.

In May 2022, COLLECTIVE accused the RSS ‘machinery’ of running propaganda against Delhi University’s Hindu College professor Ratan Lal for “speaking against Gyanvapi controversy”. Painting Ratan Lal a hero, the leftist student group demanded his release.

Ratan Lal, however, did not merely speak against the Gyanvapi controversy, but made comments hurting the sentiments of Hindus. when the Hindu side claimed to have found a Shivling in the Gyanvapi case, Ratan Lal posted an objectionable post on his social media handles, X, and Facebook. In a post, dated May 14, 2022, he wrote , “If this is a Shivling, then it seems that Lord Shiva was also circumcised.” In the same post, Ratan Lal also included a laughing emoji.

COLLECTIVE India came out in support of Ratan Lal despite the latter making highly derogatory remarks, however, it opposed former BJP spokesperson Nupur Sharma, who merely quoted the Islamic text during a television debate on Gyanvapi issue. In one of its X post supporting Alt News’s Mohammed Zubair, another Islamist accused of making anti-Hindu remarks, COLLECTIVE lamented that Nupur Sharma is free despite making ‘anti-Muslim comments’. The hypocrisy and anti-Hindu mindset of the leftist group is evident.

Conclusion

COLLECTIVE India is not a mere student organisation but a Marxist platform using on-campus activism and social media propaganda to stir unrest in India and undermine the country security and communal harmony. In the name of dismantling capitalism, patriarchy, caste structures, electoral politics and whatnot, this group of urban naxals is essentially targeting Hindus and the Indian state. Contrary to their claims of “organizing to build a revolutionary student-youth movement for Bhagat Singh’s India”, COLLECTIVE’s activism is dedicated to achieving a fragmented, de-Hinduised and economically weak India.

Hindu activist and Gau Rakshak Daksh Chaudhary arrested for calls to shut liquor shops in holy Vrindavan: Bageshwar Dham Sarkar’s call to action, Exclusive FIR details and more

0

On 24th November, Hindu activist and Gau Rakshak Daksh Chaudhary was arrested along with his friends Abhishek Thakur, Yudhishthir, Amit and Duryodhan for forcefully closing down a liquor shop in Vrindavan. Following the arrest, they were presented in the court and sent to judicial custody for 14 days.

Daksh, who is a resident of Delhi, is associated with Gau Raksha Dal and runs campaigns to save cows from smugglers. He joined Dhirendra Krishna Shastri, commonly known as Bageshwar Dham Sarkar, in the ‘Sanatan Hindu Ekta’ March. On 16th November, when the march ended in Vrindavan, Bageshwar Dham Sarkar called to close down meat and liquor shops on the stretch that Premanand Ji Maharaj takes every morning to reach Prem Mandir within one year.

On 17th November, Daksh and his friends forcefully shut down three liquor shops behind Prem Mandir and sat in protest. Videos of him shutting down the shutters of the shops were shared on his social media account where he has a humble following of over one million.

Police were called and an FIR on the complaint of one of the shopkeepers was registered against Daksh and his associates. Around a week later, Daksh was arrested.

However, in the meanwhile, a lot of things happened, among which a video of him calling the police officer and suggesting he would get him suspended for falsely accusing him that he asked for Rs 5 lakh from the shopkeeper went viral on social media. Daksh was visibly angry over the rumours and demanded video proof of the claims that he tried to extort money. He said, “If you fail to provide video proof, remember, I will get you terminated. You are falsely accusing me, remember that.”

However, no separate case was registered for allegedly threatening the police.

Another video went viral where Daksh and his friends were seen in a court. In the video, one of them said, “The fight is not over. Getting arrested is a trophy for men. If you do not speak up today, Sanatan will be no more.”

When he was being taken to the court, he briefly spoke to media and urged to make Vrindavan a “liquor-free” city.

OpIndia accessed a copy of the FIR in the matter.

What the FIR says

The FIR has been registered on the complaint of Jitendra Kumar on 18th November at Vrindavan Police Station under Sections 191(2), 352, 351(3), 127(2), 131 and 324(4) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) against Daksh Chaudhary, Abhishek Thakur, Shibbo, Kapil, Akku Pandir and 10-15 unnamed persons.

Source:UP Police

In his complaint Jitendra said that on the evening of 17th November at around 8.30 pm, he was present at the shop with Dinesh, Mukesh and Jasveer. Daksh, Abhishek, Shibbo, Kapil, Akku and 10-15 unidentified persons reached the shop. They abused Jitendra and his colleagues, threatened them, pulled down the shop shutter and locked all of them inside.

Source:UP Police

He further claimed that Daksh and his friends also abused his customers. “Their actions created fear and panic among the customers as well as among us,” he added.

Jitendra added that Daksh and his friends went to two other shops and “used intimidation and threats to misbehave with the staff there”. They “forcefully pulled the shutters down and closed the shops. They abused all the customers at those shops as well,” he added. Jitendra also claimed that Daksh and his friends threatened the customers that they would kill them.

Due to the ruckus created, the shops remained closed for one hour resulting in loss of revenue. The complainant also provided video and CCTV footage of the incident.

Following the arrest, Deputy Superintendent of Police Sandeep Kumar Singh issued a statement in which he said, “On 17th November, an incident took place where some people forcefully closed a liquor shop. An FIR was registered in Vrindavan Police Station against a few named and 10-15 unnamed persons. Out of these, five were arrested. Further legal action is being taken in the matter.”

Bageshwar Dham Sarkar came out in support of Daksh Chaudhary

On 25th November, a day after Daksh was arrested, Bageshwar Dham Sarkar, during his Katha in Shivpuri, supported him. He called on Hindus to come together and take one more step in the name of Sanatan Dharma. He said, “We are already doing our part, you must also do yours.”

He urged every Hindu to at least stand with those who are fighting for Sanatan Dharma if they cannot fight on their own. “This gives strength. It shows the opponents that our numbers are strong,” he added.

Speaking about Daksh, he said, “Right now, one young man is struggling a great deal. Daksh Chaudhary is putting up a strong fight, for Gaumata, for Hindutva, and for making the Braj region free from meat and liquor. He has a whole team with him. Another young man, who speaks very well, is Abhishek Thakur. We met him during the pad yatra. These youngsters are putting in tremendous effort. They are young, full of energy. Yes, sometimes they lose their calm for a moment, but they are doing excellent work.”

He warned, “If you do not stand together, we cannot achieve even one percent for Hindutva. It is true that we are fighting out of concern for your future generations. But Hindu society will not survive merely because Dhirendra Krishna Shastri is concerned. Every person will have to become a Dhirendra Krishna Shastri.”

“If you want to give your children a secure country, a secure inheritance, if you want to ensure that your daughters do not fall victim to love jihad, there is only one solution, before we die, a Hindu Rashtra must be established. Only then will future generations be safe. Otherwise, the day is not far when everything we have warned about will come true before your eyes,” he added.

He said that he is not speaking for himself but for everyone who is fighting for cows, society, daughters, Sanatan Dharma, temples, scriptures and saints.

Social media influencers and Gau Rakshaks demand their release

Following the arrest, several social media influencers and Gau Rakshaks came out in support of Daksh and his friends. Several Gau Rakshaks gathered outside Vrindavan Police Station and demanded that the FIR against Daksh must be dropped.

Famous influencers Baawle Chhore, in support of Daksh Chaudhary, questioned the treatment being given to Daksh and his associates who acted upon Bageshwar Dham’s appeal. They said, “When Dhirendra Shastri ji says that shops selling meat and liquor should be shut in a sacred city like Vrindavan, Sanatani youths such as Daksh Chaudhary, Akku Pandit and Abhishek Thakur simply acted on that call. Yet in return they have been sent to jail in false cases, and five lakh rupees is being extorted from them.”

They added that the youths had only one intention, “to ensure that the liquor shop on the route used by Premanand ji Maharaj is shut.” The group urged Hindu saints to stand with those who act, instead of remaining silent within their pandals and maths.

The case against Daksh Chaudhary and his associates will now move through the legal process, but the intensity of public support around them reflects a wider sentiment in Vrindavan. For many locals and devotees, the youths’ actions are seen not as acts of intimidation but as an expression of their commitment to what they believe protects the sanctity of a sacred town.

Hammer weapons system, indigenous jet engine, Rafale fuselage and more: Modi govt’s “Make in India” receives huge boost in defence production

On 24th November, the French company Safran Electronics and Defence (SED) and India’s state-run Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL) signed a joint venture cooperation agreement (JVCA) to produce the Highly Agile Modular Munition Extended Range (Hammer) smart precision-guided air-to-ground weapon system in India.

Additionally, the aerospace giant Safran SA consented to a 100% transfer of technology (ToT) to India for the engine to be made in India for India’s fifth-generation stealth fighter plane, including for the engine’s crucial hot section.

Similarly, the Netherlands-based KNDS and domestic defence equipment manufacturer SMPP have joined hands on the KATANA range of precision-guided artillery ammunition. On 20th November 2025, the contract was signed, during the Milipol Exhibition in Paris.

Dassault and Tata Advanced Systems Limited (TASL) of India have already decided to collaborate on the production of Rafale aircraft fuselage at a special facility in Hyderabad, in June. These major developments have given a massive boost to Modi government’s ambitious “Make in India” initiative in the defence sector.

Hammer weapons system and its function

During the confrontation with China in eastern Ladakh (Galwan) in 2020, India used the emergency procurement channel to buy Hammer weapons system and other munitions from France to outfit its Rafale fighter jets. The Rafale planes and the indigenous Tejas Light Combat Aircraft were to be equipped with more of this weapon system.

“The JVC shall be formed as a private limited company with 50:50 shareholding. It will localise the manufacturing, supply and maintenance of Hammer to meet the operational needs of the Indian Air Force and the Indian Navy,” the deal highlighted as it formalised the aim stated in the agreement signed by BEL and SED during Aero India on 11th February.

The agreement will localise the production, supply, and maintenance of the Hammer weapons system to satisfy the operational requirements of the Indian Air Force and the Indian Navy.

Image via Moneycontrol

Likewise, important sub-assemblies, electronics, and mechanical parts are going to be produced domestically as the percentage of indigenisation gradually rises to 60%. The government further stated that BEL will oversee final assembly, testing and quality assurance during the phased transfer of manufacturing.

The guidance and propulsion package of the Hammer, an air-to-surface weapon, converts ammunition into precision-guided bombs that can carry out close-air support and extensive attacks. Hammer systems integrate GPS, INS and infrared/semi-active laser guidance kits with conventional bombs. It has several warhead variants of 125 kilograms, 250 kilgrams, 500 kilograms and 1,000 kilograms and also offers a range of up to 70 kilometres, depending on the variation.

The French company that developed the Hammer weapon system also reported that it has a 99 percent success rate in warfare and can even attack moving targets due to its fire-and-forget capability. It can also be launched over uneven terrain at low altitudes.

The system proved its full potential during Operation Sindoor as the Armed Forces destroyed terrorist infrastructure inside Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. The Indian Air Force used Scalp missiles and Hammer munitions fired from Rafale fighter jets to conduct many strikes and raids on terror targets in Pakistan and PoK.

Many defence specialists pointed out that India selected the system because of its complete autonomy and immunity to jamming. It was also the ideal choice for breaking through reinforced structures owing to its low-altitude launch ability.

India’s own jet engine

India is set to approve a joint project by French firm Safran SA and India’s Gas Turbine Research Establishment (GTRE) of the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) to develop and produce a 120 Kilo Newton jet engine with Indian intellectual property rights (IPR). It will power the twin-engine Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) being designed by the Aeronautical Development Agency, and to be manufactured with the collaboration with the private sector.

Olivier Andries, CEO of Safran, conveyed, “It’s a complete transfer of technologies. We along with the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) are basically going to develop a new engine together in India. This is unique because no one else has made that offer.” reported The Ecomoic Times.

Within twelve years, Safran-GTRE would produce nine fighter engine prototype. The capacity of the engines will be increased from 120 KN to 140 KN by the end of the 12-year timeframe, according to Hindustan Times. The engine’s crystal blades, included in 100% technology transfer, are often made from a single crystal utilising super-alloys, are effective, durable and more resilient to elevated heat and stress.

Currently, engines of foreign origin power all Indian fighter jets. The Tejas jet currently in production use GE engines, and the Tejas Mk-2 under development will also GE engines. The engine and upkeep account for a large portion of a fighter’s cost. Andries disclosed that the scope of work would also include vital components that India would hold intellectual property rights over such as compressors and turbines. According to him, the business is also willing to establish an assembly line for the M88 engines found in Rafale combat jets.

Andries stated that the corporation is attempting to diversify its manufacturing across geography in order to protect itself against unanticipated scenario and India is also becoming a major priority for its commercial aircraft program. It opened a maintenance and repair facility (MRO) in Hyderabad for the Leap engines, which power well-known narrow-body aircraft like the Boeing 737 Max and Airbus A320.

Over 1,300 aircrafts are ordered by IndiGo, Air India and Akasa and are scheduled to be delivered in the coming years. The government’s initiative to localise aerospace maintenance capabilities is well-suited to the plant, which is India’s first and can perform intricate tasks like engine overhauls. It also helps Indian airlines by cutting down on maintenance turnaround times.

Meanwhile, the Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA) has invited domestic companies to submit expressions of interest (EOI) for the creation of the nation’s first indigenous fifth-generation stealth fighter jet, which is a remarkable milestone in the country’s ambitious AMCA program.

SMPP and KNDS prepare to deliver KATANA range of artillery ammunition

One of the top defence and aerospace firms in India, SMPP, has partnered with KNDS to produce KATANA series of precision-guided artillery ammunition through its subsidiary SMPP Ammunition. Ballistic Range (BR), Extended Range (ER) and High Precision (HP) ammunition are all part of the KATANA family. The system is a 155-millimeter precision-guided munition intended to provide accurate and long-range support for artillery operations.

It meets the vital operational requirements of contemporary artillery systems by providing high accuracy and long range. Each variation improves efficacy, accuracy and range. The ammunition use a hybrid guidance system that combines an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) with a multi-constellation GNSS receiver to reach decametric-level precision. A semi-active laser seeker would be reportedly included in a future version to attain metric-level accuracy.

Image r/FrenchArmedForces

The fire-and-forget functionality of the munition makes it suitable for employment in complex and dense locations. This integrated system provides guaranteed accuracy in an array of combat situations and terrains. The KATANA family will be made available to the Indian Army under the “Make in India” program as part of the teaming arrangement between SMPP and KNDS.

According to SMPP, the partnership is in line with the Army’s need for 155 millimetre ammunition and artillery systems.

The company was established in 1985 and produces unmanned aerial systems, medium and large caliber ammunition, platform armouring and human protection systems. Himachal Pradesh and Haryana are home to its operations. KNDS Ammo France is a member of the KNDS Group, which creates and provides land defence systems, including system integration services, mission solutions and ammunition.

Rafale fuselage production in India

Four Production Transfer Agreements have been signed by Dassault Aviation and Tata Advanced Systems Limited to produce the Rafale fighter aircraft fuselage in India. This is a major step towards bolstering the nation’s aerospace manufacturing capabilities and assisting international supply chains.

The front portion, centre fuselage, rear section and lateral rear shells are the main structural components of the aircraft that would be produced in India. With a monthly production capacity of up to two full fuselages, the first fuselage portions are planned to be released by fiscal year 2028.

India is going to manufacture the Rafale fuselage for both local and international markets and are going to be built outside of France for the first time in history.

The fuselage of the Rafale fighter jet on the assembly line at the new Dassault Aviation factory in Cergy. (Source: Thibaud Moritz/AFP)

The CEO and chairman of Dassault Aviation, Eric Trappier, highlighted that this association is a “decisive step in strengthening our supply chain in India.” He pointed out that it fits with the company’s long-term plan to work with Indian aerospace companies like TASL.

“The production of the complete Rafale fuselage in India underscores the deepening trust in Tata Advanced Systems’ capabilities and the strength of our collaboration with Dassault Aviation. It also reflects the remarkable progress India has made in establishing a modern, robust aerospace manufacturing ecosystem that can support global platforms,” voiced Sukaran Singh, Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director of TASL.

He described the arrangement as a turning point in India’s aerospace history, showcasing both the country’s production strengths and the confidence that global aerospace executives have in Indian partners. This facility would be an important hub for high-precision manufacturing and a great investment in India’s aeronautical infrastructure.

Rafale was instrumental in India’s military action against Pakistan after the Pahalgam terror attack. The aforementioned agreements underscore how India is advancing in the indigenisation of its defense sector, thereby offering a substantial enhancement to the “Make in India” campaign.

Kerala ISIS radicalisation: Minor groomed for jihad in madarsa by mother, stepfather and terror convict Siddhikul Aslam, SDPI link emerges

Kerala has a history of Islamic radicalisation. Islamic terror group ISIS has long been associated with attempts at luring the Muslim youth from the state into its Jihadist crimes. On 14th November, a fresh case of ISIS recruitment emerged from Thiruvananthapuram, wherein 15-year-old boy was radicalised by his mother Fida Mohammad Ali and her second husband Ansar Aslam into joining the Islamic State terrorist organisation.

The minor boy was shown ISIS-related videos by the accused couple when he was in the United Kingdom. An FIR has been lodged at the Venjaramoodu Police Station in Kerala and the accused couple has been booked under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. The matter came to light after the teen escaped the attempt to push him into ISIS’s Jihadi terrorism. The police have arrested Fida and her husband Ansar.

The police swung into action after, the boy’s relatives learnt from him about the attempts being made to make him join the ISIS and the relatives approached the police.

The police then questioned the boy, who directly accused his parents of attempting to push him to join ISIS by showing him propaganda videos, including the beheading videos. The boy told the police that his stepfather assaulted him brutally for not accepting ISIS’s ideology.

It has also emerged that the teenager was brought to a madarsa in Attingal by ex-terror convict Siddhikul Aslam (Some media reports say Siddiqui). NDTV reports that the madarsa staff said that Siddhikul Aslam had absolute control over the teen and the latter’s mother never visited. They said that Siddhikul Aslam was brainwashing the teen into hating others. Siddhikul Aslam is reported to hold Islamic Jihadist mindset.

The teenager did not like the Siddhikul Aslam extremist ideology and used to fear him. There were obvious behavioural changes in the teen’s behaviour. There were patterns that deviated from routine conduct and indicated distress. The institution informed the child’s relatives in Kerala and alerted them about the boy’s abnormal behaviour, suggesting he needed immediate attention. This communication became the turning point that eventually brought the matter before the police.

According to the police, the boy, who hails from the woman’s first marriage, travelled with her and her second husband, Ansar Aslam, to the United Kingdom in 2021. It was during that time the couple tried to push him to join ISIS. The boy told investigators that his mother and stepfather repeatedly showed him ISIS propaganda videos and pressured him to study the organisation’s ideology. They forced him to consider joining the terrorist outfit. The coercion attempts reportedly created friction within the household and the teenager resisted the extremist ideas being pushed on him.

The probe agencies have found an ISIS flag and it is emerging that the accused persons have taken oath of allegiance to the Islamic terror group.  The accused persons were planning to send the minor boy to Syria to join the ISIS. Ansar Aslam is also reported to have been in contact with his ISIS handlers.

At present, the Kerala Anti-Terrorist Squad (ATS) is probing the matter, although the NIA is expected to join or takeover the case.

After spending several years in the UK, the family returned to Kerala earlier this year. Soon after their arrival, the mother and stepfather admitted the child to a madarsa in Attingal. 

Reports say that accused Fida had converted from Christianity to Islam before marrying her first husband. It was during her stay in the UK along with her first husband that she came in contact with Ansar, who eventually became her second husband.

Accused Fida married Siddhikul Aslam and was in live-in relationship with his brother Ansar Aslam?

However, a TimesNow report reports citing an insider source linked to the victim teen’s biological father and Fida’s first husband Mohammad Ali, that Fida married Siddhikul Aslam without divorcing him and was also in a live-in relationship with Ansar in Leicester, who happens to be Siddhikul’s brother.

Born in a Christian family, Fida fell in love with Mohammad Ali during her college days. The couple had three children, including the 15-year-old victim. However, after 17 years of marriage with Mohammad Ali, Fida came in contact with Ansar Aslam’s brother Siddhikul Aslam. Much like what was happening with her son, Fida too was radicalised by showing videos glorifying the ISIS. Siddhikul Aslam succeeded in completely brainwashing Fida.

As per a Republic TV report, Fida has claimed that her husband is an active member of the Social Democratic Party of India (SDPI), which is a political front of the banned Islamic terror outfit Popular Front of India (PFI).

Earlier this year, the Enforcement Directorate disclosed that the SDPI, a political party, relied on the banned organization Popular Front of India (PFI) for its daily operations, policy decisions, and candidate selection for election campaigns. Several SDPI office bearers were booked under the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002.

OpIndia reported earlier how the PFI was involved in various Islamic Jihadist activities, including terror conspiracies and was working on its ‘Vision 2047’ plan to turn a Hindu-majority India into an Islamic nation.

Siddhikul Aslam convicted in ISIS conspiracy case

Siddhikul Aslam was convicted in the 2016 Kanakamala ISIS conspiracy case, where 8 persons were chargesheeted for plotting terror attacks in Kerala and Tamil Nadu. Ansar could not be charged because he was living in Ukraine at that time.

It must be recalled that in 2016, the National Investigation Agency (NIA) busted an ISIS terror module called Ansar-ul-Khilafah Kerala. This group was linked to ISIS from Kanakamala in Kannur district. Its members were holding meetings to chalk out plan to do terror attacks in Kerala and Tamil Nadu. Back then, the security agencies arrested six people and Siddhikul Aslam was arrested from Delhi airport when he was deported from Saudi Arabia with Interpol’s assistance.

In 2022, a special NIA court found Siddhikul Aslam guilty under relevant sections of the UAPA. He was found to be a member of the ISIS and also supporting its terror activities. In addition to three years of rigorous punishment, Rs 60,000 fine was imposed on him.

Siddhikul was convicted under section 120B (Criminal conspiracy) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), besides offences under sections 38 (offence relating to membership of a terrorist organisation) and 39 (offence relating to support given to a terrorist organisation) of the UAPA.

Interestingly, Siddhikul had pleaded guilty back then and also expressed ‘remorse’ over his Islamic terrorist activities. He had also told the court that he wants to give up terrorism and live a peaceful life with his family. Judge  Kamanees had also stressed that given Siddhikul’s supposed ‘remorse’ over his jihadist deeds, a reformist approach should prevail in deciding his sentence.

 However, Siddhikul’s emerging role in radicalising the minor boy in the present case makes it evident, his ‘remorse’ was a sham and tactic to secure lenient sentence. The episode also raises alarm over a radicalised individual who was planning terror attacks was given a lenient sentence despite posing a grave threat to national security, merely because he expressed remorse over his actions. It, however, is evident that Siddhikul Aslam never really abandoned his pro-ISIS ideology and was actively disseminating the same into the minor boy in the present case.

What is CASR? Inside the radical collective that ties Delhi’s ‘anti-pollution’ protestors to Harsh Mander, Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam and Imran Masood – The network runs deep

0

On 23rd November, the so-called ‘anti-pollution’ protest at C-Hexagon near India Gate in Delhi, spearheaded by left-leaning student organisations Bhagat Singh Chhatra Ekta Manch (bsCEM) and The Himkhand, quickly spiralled into a spectacle of glorified Naxalism and violence. Protesters, who claimed to have gathered to demonstrate against rising pollution in the National Capital, openly hailed slain Naxal commander Madvi Hidma. They even attacked police personnel with pepper spray.

As a result of the violence, 22 individuals have been booked. So far, police have arrested 16 of them, out of which 15 were sent to judicial remand and one was sent to a juvenile safe house. As the legal action against these individuals and groups intensified, their digital footprint has exposed a deeply problematic history.

Authorities have also invoked Section 197 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, which pertains to acts or communications that threaten India’s sovereignty, unity, integrity or security.

bsCEM is one of the 40+ organisations that formed a collective called “Campaign Against State Repression” or CASR. On Instagram, they run a page called “Kis Kis Ko Qaid Karoge”. They continuously campaign for the release of so-called “political prisoners”. The collective’s history can be traced back to 2018. On social media, there presence can be traced back to 2022 when they started a campaign for the release of now-deceased Naxalite professor Gokrakonda Naga Saibaba (GN Saibaba), who was in jail for his involvement with Naxal organisations. GN Saibaba died in prison.

Source: Instagram

Earlier, there was a page with its Hindi name “Kis Kis Ko Qaid Karoge” that was created in 2018.

Source: Facebook

Information about the organisations under CASR banner reveals questionable past and associations. Interestingly, many of these organisations had supported propaganda event ‘Let Kashmir Speak’ in March 2023. The event was cancelled after Delhi Police revoked the permission for the event following uproar.

All India Revolutionary Students Organisation (AIRSO)

All India Revolutionary Students Organisation (AIRSO) is the student wing of Communist Party of India (Marxist–Leninist) Red Star which came into existance in 2009. While AIRSO presents itself as a students’ organisation, its own literature makes the ideology clear. The organisation romanticises the violent insurgencies of the 1960s and 70s. It idolises Naxalbari as a “great struggle” and frames the bloodshed of that era as a noble awakening of India’s youth.

Source: Facebook

Its stated objective is to build a “powerful, broad-based” nationwide students’ front aligned with the same revolutionary ideology that fuelled decades of extremist violence. AIRSO is not a students’ body, it is an ideological grooming platform that glorifies Naxalism under the guise of student activism.

All India Students’ Association (AISA)

All India Students’ Association (AISA) is a radical students’ movement. It was formed in 1990 and wraps itself in lofty rhetoric about “revolutionary transformation” and “a new world”, while functioning as a disruptive, ideological nuisance across university campuses, particularly in Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), where it proudly waves its red flag year after year. It is the student wing of Communist Party of India (Marxist–Leninist) Liberation. Recently, they condemned the killing of India’s most wanted Naxal Madvi Hidma.

AISA’s literature is packed with the usual jargon about neo-liberal assaults, imperialist aggression and anti-people politics. It celebrates confrontational street politics and frames its activism as a fight against everything from fee hikes to American imperialism.

It is less a students’ organisation and more a campus-based radical machinery that thrives on agitation, perpetual grievance and ideological posturing, all while destabilising academic spaces under the guise of student rights.

All India Students’ Federation (AISF)

All India Students’ Federation (AISF), formed in 1936, is the student wing of the Communist Party of India. It routinely projects itself as the “first” student federation to work for India’s independence, yet today it functions largely as an ideological relic kept alive to serve the CPI’s political interests on campuses.

Source: Facebook

AISF’s self-glorifying narrative leans heavily on invoking names like Jawaharlal Nehru, APJ Abdul Kalam and Atal Bihari Vajpayee, as though the organisation still bears any resemblance to what existed in the pre-independence era. In reality, AISF has long drifted from student-centric issues and now operates as a tired, doctrinaire extension of CPI’s outdated politics, clinging to nostalgia rather than addressing the real concerns of modern students.

Association for Protection of Civil Rights (APCR)

The Association for Protection of Civil Rights (APCR) presents itself as a non-profit working to “bridge the gap between law and justice”, but its track record tells a different story. Formed in 2006 and registered under the Societies Registration Act, the organisation claims to offer free legal aid, financial assistance and legal literacy programmes through workshops and seminars.

Harsh Mander and Saba Naqvi at APCR report release event on Sambhal. (Image: APCR)

Behind this polished description, however, APCR has repeatedly appeared in controversial cases, often extending legal aid to individuals accused in violent incidents such as the Sambhal violence and the anti-Hindu Delhi riots. Its so-called “fact-finding reports” read less like neutral documentation and more like one-sided propaganda designed to shield certain groups while vilifying others.

APCR’s leadership includes senior lawyers and long-time activists, yet the organisation functions less as a civil rights body and more as an advocacy front that selectively deploys the language of rights to defend the accused in communally charged cases.

APCR also has strong ties with the likes of Harsh Mander and Saba Naqvi. Harsh Mander who is known for his anti-India activities. In May this year, he tried to negotiate with the government on behalf of Naxals who are being neutralised under Operation Kagar. During anti-CAA protests, he was seen inciting Muslims against the central government using lies and fake information about the Citizen (Amendment) Act. In 2023, Ministry of Home Affairs had recommended inquiry against his NGO and in 2024, Central Bureau of Investigation had raided premises linked to him in FCRA violation case.

Saba Naqvi is known for her problematic remarks and her consistent anti-Hindu stance. In June 2022, she insulted the Shivling found at Gyanvapi. In May this year, when India counter-attacked Pakistan after the deadly Pahalgam terrorist attack, Naqvi was among the left-leaning, self-styled secular warriors who rushed to call for peace between India and Pakistan.

Imran Masood or “Boti Boti Masood”, who had once threatened to chop Prime Minister Narendra Modi into pieces, is also linked to APCR. His venomous remarks made him the “blue-eyed boy” of Islamic fundamentalists.

Bhim Army

The Bhim Army, founded in 2015 by Satish Kumar, Vinay Ratan Singh and Chandrashekhar Azad, projects itself as an Ambedkarite organisation working for Dalit rights. In reality, it has evolved into a hyper-confrontational outfit that thrives on street mobilisation, aggressive posturing and polarising identity politics. While it claims to run hundreds of free schools in Uttar Pradesh, the group’s public footprint is dominated far more by provocation, rallies, clashes and attempts to build a Dalit–Muslim political coalition.

Its stated mission of “direct action based on confrontation” speaks for itself. Led by Chandrashekhar Azad, the organisation routinely presents itself as a defender of “Bahujan identity” while openly positioning the BJP as its primary political enemy. Over the years, Bhim Army has found itself at the centre of violent flashpoints, from the 2017 Saharanpur clashes to its aggressive role in the anti-CAA protests, where its supporters engaged in street confrontations.

Despite repeatedly claiming constitutional loyalty, the group has consistently embraced high-voltage agitation over constructive engagement, operating more like a pressure group seeking to leverage caste fault lines for political mileage than a genuine rights-based organisation.

Chandrashekhar Azad ‘Ravan’, who is now a Member of the Parliament, has been accused of ruining the lives of multiple girls by a woman named Rohini Ghavari. In June this year, Azad’s party members were seen creating mahyem in Prayagraj. He has repeatedly pushed for reservations in the Private Sector. In February 2024, he was accused of threatening administrative officials that he would file a case against them under the SC/ST Act. Notably, the Act, which is meant to guard the marginalised communities from atrocities, is often used by some members of the community for vested interests. Recently, the Special SC/ST Court in Lucknow sentenced a woman to 3.5 years in prison for filing a fake SC/ST case.

Bhim Army Student’s Federation (BASF)

BASF is the student wing of Bhim Army.

Bhagat Singh Chhatra Ekta Manch (bsCEM)

Bhagat Singh Chhatra Ekta Manch (bsCEM) presents itself as a student-led “democratic” collective, but its own material makes the ideological tilt unmistakable. Formed in 2018 at Delhi University, bsCEM openly grounds itself in the revolutionary doctrines of Bhagat Singh and Charu Mazumdar, even declaring that students must “smash the old and create a new society” as part of a broader class struggle. This is not student activism, it is old-school Marxist agitation repackaged for DU campuses.

Its pamphlets repeatedly invoke Mao, call the education system “rotting”, and position students as foot soldiers who must integrate with “oppressed masses”, join bastis, oppose NEP, resist so-called “anti-people” policies, and fight “Hindutva ideology”. The organisation boasts of joining protests on CAA-NRC, the farmers’ movement, campus harassment cases, and even publishes a magazine pushing a self-proclaimed “revolutionary” worldview.

bsCEM functions less like a student support body and more like a radical mobilisation unit operating inside Delhi University. It thrives on agitation, ideological indoctrination and anti-establishment rhetoric, all while masquerading as a harmless student collective.

COLLECTIVE

COLLECTIVE describes itself as a student-youth movement “building a socialist future for India”, but its programme reads like an unfiltered ideological manifesto rather than anything remotely student-centric. Adopted during its first Delhi State Conference in March 2021, its worldview is built entirely on the classic far-left narrative that is, capitalism is collapsing, fascism is rising, and only a revolutionary uprising led by students and the “toiling people” can save the country.

According to COLLECTIVE, India today is under the “ascendancy of far-Right fascist forces”, empowered by neo-liberal capitalism, global finance, and supposedly anti-scientific, anti-secular tendencies. The organisation casts the RSS and BJP as central villains, accuses the state of “criminalising every voice of dissent”, and repeatedly frames modern governance as a slide into authoritarianism. Every policy from NEP to economic reforms is portrayed as a corporate conspiracy backed by imperialist interests.

The group situates students not as learners but as frontline participants in a global anti-capitalist struggle. It romanticises historical uprisings, glorifies Naxalbari, and constantly invokes revolutionaries from Bhagat Singh to Latin American agitators. Education, in its view, is merely another “apparatus of dominant hegemony” that must be resisted, overturned and repurposed towards class struggle.

COLLECTIVE recently came out in support of Kashmir Times after its office was raided. Police had recovered ammunition from the office.

On 22nd January 2024, the day when Ram Lalla Pran Pratishtha took place at Ram Mandir, Ayodhya, COLLECTIVE wrote on X “BJP-RSS terrorism unleashed across India”.

Source: X

COLLECTIVE is not a student organisation but a doctrinaire Marxist platform pushing for revolutionary transformation. Its literature is steeped in crisis narratives, anti-state rhetoric and ideological alarmism. Under the veneer of student engagement, it aggressively calls for dismantling capitalism, patriarchy, caste structures, electoral politics and even the existing idea of the Indian state, making it one of the most openly radical groups operating on campuses today.

Committee for Release of Political Prisoners (CRPP)

The Committee for the Release of Political Prisoners (CRPP), founded in 2003 by Rona Wilson, Amit Bhattacharyya and SAR Geelani, has been described by the Ministry of Home Affairs as a front of the banned CPI (Maoist). Operating under the banner of “civil liberties”, it campaigns for the unconditional release of individuals it labels as political prisoners, many of whom face serious charges linked to extremist violence.

One of its founders, Rona Wilson, has himself been at the centre of multiple controversies. Pune Police had earlier recovered a sensational letter from his Delhi residence suggesting that Maoist elements were discussing a “Rajiv Gandhi–type” plot to target Prime Minister Narendra Modi, seeking Rs 8 crore to procure M4 rifles and ammunition. Wilson was later arrested in the Bhima Koregaon–Elgar Parishad case, with investigators alleging he coordinated between urban networks and jungle-based Maoist cadres and was a close aide of convicted Naxal ideologue GN Saibaba.

After over six years in prison, Wilson was granted bail by the Bombay High Court on 8 January 2025 due to the prolonged delay in trial and was released on 24 January under strict conditions, including surrendering his passport and regular appearances before the NIA. Though he has long denied Maoist links, Wilson has been repeatedly questioned since his JNU days for his association with figures like SAR Geelani.

Dayar-I-Shauq Students’ Charter (DISSC)

Dayar-i-Shauq Students’ Charter (DISSC) describes itself as a “progressive democratic” mass organisation at Jamia Millia Islamia, but in reality, it functions as a predictable left-wing political bloc on campus. Formed in 2015, it claims to revive debate and dissent, yet its activism has consistently aligned with the broader Left–Islamist ecosystem in Jamia, using student issues as a gateway to push ideological battles rather than academic concerns.

The group’s conduct during campus flashpoints speaks for itself. In June 2022, DISSC joined Islamist groups such as the Campus Front of India (the student wing of the now-banned Popular Front of India) to physically block an ABVP-organised environmental awareness event. Protesters shut Jamia’s gates, chanted “Nara-e-Takbeer Allah-Hu-Akbar”, “ABVP Murdabad” and “ABVP Campus Chhodo”, and prevented environmentalist Imteyaz Ali and DUSU President Akshit Dahiya from even entering the campus. DSSC members held placards calling ABVP “Islamophobic”, branding them “hatemongers”, and invoking Najeeb to whip up sentiment.

In short, DISSC is less a student body and more a frontline participant in the Left–Islamist coalition that routinely polices Jamia’s campus space, suppresses opposing viewpoints and aggressively frames even apolitical events as ideological battlegrounds.

Democratic Student Union (DSU)

The Democratic Students’ Union (DSU) is an openly radical student outfit active in Jawaharlal Nehru University and Delhi University. It is a constituent of the All India Revolutionary Students’ Federation (AIRSF) and explicitly works toward the goals of the so-called “New Democratic Revolution”, a doctrine rooted in far-left extremist ideology rather than any student-centric cause.

DSU is best known for the notoriety it brought to JNU in 2016. On 9 February that year, DSU members and allies organised a protest opposing the execution of Parliament attack convict Afzal Guru and Kashmiri separatist Maqbool Bhat. Slogans such as “Afzal hum sharminda hain, tere qatil zinda hain” were raised on campus. Former DSU leader Umar Khalid, along with Kanhaiya Kumar and Anirban Bhattacharya, was arrested for his role in the incident.

Umar Khalid’s trajectory further showcases DSU’s ideological ecosystem. He was later arrested under UAPA in the larger conspiracy case linked to the anti-Hindu Delhi riots 2020, with investigators alleging his involvement in orchestrating the violence. Khalid’s background too has raised questions, as his father, Syed Qasim Rasool Ilyas, was a member of the now-banned terrorist outfit SIMI.

DSU operates less as a student organisation and more as a hard-left political formation that has repeatedly pushed extremist narratives on campuses under the guise of activism.

Democratic teachers’ Front (DTF)

The Democratic Teachers’ Front (DTF) is a Left-leaning teachers’ organisation in Delhi University that positions itself as a defender of “democratic” academic spaces. It has long been involved in campus agitations, opposing central reforms including the Modi government’s education initiatives, the National Education Policy and the move to scrap the Senate in Panjab University.

Fraternity Movement

The Fraternity Movement is the student wing of the Welfare Party of India and operates with the slogan “Democracy, Social Justice and Fraternity”. Despite this benign framing, the group has repeatedly aligned itself with hardline positions. Fatermity was one of the organisations present at the so-called anti-pollution protests in Delhi.

During the anti-CAA protests in December 2019, its members even blocked Calicut International Airport. The Welfare Party of India itself is led by figures such as Syed Qasim Rasool Ilyas, former member of SIMI and father of Umar Khalid, and has long been associated with Islamist-leaning activism.

Several controversial activists are linked to the Fraternity Movement, including Afreen Fatima and Aysha Renna. Fatima has publicly defended Parliament attack convict Afzal Guru, repeatedly urging people to “revisit” his verdict. She has also questioned the Supreme Court over decisions like the Ram Mandir judgment. Renna, celebrated by sections of the media, openly backed Sharjeel Imam, calling police action against him a “witch hunt” and demanding that cases against him be dropped, despite his inflammatory secessionist speeches.

The Fraternity Movement, therefore, functions not as a student rights platform but as a political extension of the Welfare Party’s ideological ecosystem, frequently championing extremist, polarising and anti-establishment narratives under the cover of campus activism.

Indian Association of People’s Lawyers (IAPL)

The Indian Association of People’s Lawyers (IAPL) presents itself as a collective of “people’s lawyers” committed to justice, equality and human rights. Its constitution frames the Indian state as imperialist and oppressive, calls for resisting “unjust class rule”, and pledges support for anti-imperialist struggles. On paper, it is a national body of lawyers and legal activists; however, the National Investigation Agency’s findings paint a starkly different picture.

According to the NIA chargesheet in the Elgar Parishad case, IAPL is a frontal organisation of the banned CPI (Maoist). Investigators recorded witness statements describing how the group’s activities, fact-finding missions, legal support networks and meetings—often involved individuals suspected to be Maoists. One witness recounted a 2018 Kashmir fact-finding visit where non-lawyers, believed to be Maoist operatives, were present; when this was pointed out to accused Arun Ferreira, he reportedly “just smiled”, reinforcing suspicions about IAPL’s role.

The NIA emphasised that IAPL’s work consistently furthered the Maoist agenda under the guise of legal activism, and that multiple activists linked to Maoist cases operated through it. Although some members resigned citing ideological differences, the agency maintains that the outfit has served as a cover structure providing support to Maoist networks.

Despite its claims of safeguarding human rights, the organisation has repeatedly appeared in investigations as part of the broader urban support system of CPI (Maoist), using legal advocacy and fact-finding missions to shield operatives, influence narratives and advance extremist objectives. The organisation, however, has claimed it has nothing to do with CPI(Maoist).

Nazariya Magazine

Nazariya Magazine is an openly Marxist-Leninist-Maoist publication that frames India as a “semi-colonial, semi-feudal” state under “Brahmanical Hindutva fascism” and positions itself as an ideological weapon for militant revolutionary politics. It insists that Marxism-Leninism-Maoism is the only path to overthrow “class enemies” and build a new socialist order.

In 2024, Nazariya faced a major scandal when one of its own employees accused Mukundan Nair of sexual assault. Instead of supporting her, Nazariya formed an internal committee that recommended vague “rectification” for the accused. When the survivor objected, the organisation expelled her in November 2024 and released statements accusing her of “imperialist ideology”, “non-ideological sexual relationships” and violating “communist morality”, irrelevant attacks used to discredit her and protect the accused.

The survivor later revealed that activists linked to bsCEM had participated in slandering her and spreading false claims. Photographs surfaced showing bsCEM members socialising with Mukundan despite admitting privately that they knew about the allegations. Rather than confronting the misconduct, Nazariya, bsCEM, FACAM and even SfPD escalated the matter into an ideological war, deleting comments, blocking critics and using the survivor’s trauma to score political points.

The episode exposed Nazariya’s hypocrisy, revealing a collective that shields an accused offender while vilifying its own employee to preserve ideological purity.

Rihai Manch

It is a political front that claims to resist repression. It was involved in an array of protests including anti-CAA and farmer protests.

Students’ Federation of India (SFI)

Students’ Federation in India is a left-wing student organisation. OpIndia has covered the organisation extensively. It can be checked here.

United Peace Alliance

The United Peace Alliance is a political front led by Mir Shahid Saleem, positioned as a platform for “resistance against repression” in Kashmir. While it uses the language of peace and rights, the group consistently aligns itself with hardline narratives against the Indian state, particularly after the abrogation of Article 370.

Saleem, the organisation’s chairman, routinely asserts that the Centre has “intimidated”, “frightened” and “oppressed” Kashmiris since 5th August, 2019. Under his leadership, the United Peace Alliance has organised conferences, protested against marking 5th August as a day of celebration, and instead promoted it as “Black Day”.

The group’s activities revolve around amplifying anti-370 sentiment, portraying constitutional changes as repression, and creating political mobilisation around these claims. Rather than contributing to peace, the United Peace Alliance functions as yet another pressure group that keeps separatist rhetoric alive under the garb of rights advocacy.

Youth 4 Swaraj (Y4S)

Youth 4 Swaraj (Y4S) is the student-youth wing of Yogendra Yadav’s political party, Swaraj India. While it projects itself as a platform for “alternative politics” and youth mobilisation on issues ranging from drought relief to campus activism, the organisation has been marred by serious allegations of sexual assault and institutional apathy.

In 2020, a former Y4S member publicly accused Manish Kumar, the then President of Youth 4 Swaraj, of sexually assaulting her. She stated that she had informed Yogendra Yadav and other senior leaders about the abuse, but her complaints were ignored. According to her account, she was mentally traumatised by members of Swaraj India and eventually forced to resign. Even after she reported the assault, Manish Kumar continued to represent Y4S at the Singhu border during the farmers’ protests.

The survivor also alleged that when she approached Yogendra Yadav directly, he responded with silence, while Avik Saha, the Vice President of Swaraj India, merely asked her to go to the police. In her resignation letter, shared on Instagram, she wrote that the organisation protected abusers while shifting the burden and stigma onto women who spoke up.

Other organisations include ASA, BSM, CEM, CSM, CTF, LAA, Forum Against Repression Telangana, Karnataka Janashakti, Mazdoor Adhikar Sangathan, Mazdoor Patrika, NAPM, Nishant Natya Manch, New Trade Union Initiative (NTUI), People’s Watch, Samajwadi Janparishad, Samajwadi Lok Manch, Bahujan Samjavadi Manach, Women Against Sexual Violence and State Repression (WSS), Nowruz, Innocence Network and others.

Taken together, the events at India Gate and the profiles of these outfits make it clear that the ‘anti-pollution’ protest was never about air quality, it was about pushing a coordinated ideological agenda that glorifies Naxals, undermines Indian institutions and weaponises campuses, courts and “civil rights” language against the country. From students’ bodies and “rights” collectives to lawyers’ fronts and Kashmir pressure groups, the network around bsCEM and CASR is not accidental, it is an ecosystem that normalises anti-India rhetoric while seeking impunity for those facing serious charges. This report is only the beginning of an OpIndia series that will systematically expose the organisational web of pro-Naxal, Left-leaning groups that are indulging in anti-India activities under various respectable sounding labels.

Ram Mandir Dhwajarohan: How Pakistan, Islamists and India’s woke brigade united in hatred against Hindu civilisational revival

On 25th November, a grand event took place in Ayodhya for the Dhwajarohan (flag hoisting) ceremony of the Ram Mandir. The sacred ceremony signified the completion of the construction of the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi temple. The saffron flag was hosted by Prime Minister Narendra Modi atop the temple’s “shikhar” and even addressed a gathering, emphasising that the occasion represented the realisation of a 500-year-old civilisational commitment.

Nevertheless, how could such a momentous day for Hindus and the Vedic religion ever pass without the vitriol and hatred from Islamists, woke individuals as well as the terror state of Pakistan, which has been systematically destroying its shrinking minorities, especially Hindus, for decades, while admonishing India about upholding secularism?

The rectification of a historical injustice was labeled as “Islamophobia” and “heritage desecration” by jihad-led Islamabad, whereas the reality is that the contested structure had supplanted the true heritage of India which has been restored after centuries, following the return of the deity to his rightful abode.

The rhetoric against India and Hindumisia unfolded as expected, with irony facing countless deaths, as the Islamic Republic accused India of “discrimination towards minorities” and of “eradicating Muslim culture and heritage” by Hindutva forces, while depicting the second-largest majority in the country as “victims” of state oppression.

Afterward, the ministry requested the United Nations and the international community to intervene in India’s internal matters based on unsubstantiated charges of “hate speech” and “hate-motivated attacks.” The absurdity continued when it asked the Modi government to protect minorities and their places of worship, even invoking international human rights obligations.

It is indeed Kalyuga when a nation where mere bogus claims of blasphemy suffice to lynch or burn individuals, particularly Hindus, to death, the judiciary acts as kangaroo courts to appease the Islamists and the greatest output is that of terrorism, sermons India on inclusivity and minority rights.

Indian wokes, Islamists join Pakistan to demonstrate their contempt for the event

Notably, there is not much difference in the hostility towards Sanatan Dharma from the leftist-liberal “woke” lobby in India and their Miuslim counterparts across the border. They are nearly tied together by their common loathing for all things Hindu.

The same was illustrated by the cabal when Congress leader Lavanya Ballal Jain criticised journalist Rahul Shivshankar and argued that his celebratory post over the flag hoisting program was not only a fabrication but also stemmed from fear.

Shivshankar had rightly pointed out how honouring India’s Hindu origins was viewed as “communal activism” under past governments and the nation has eventually emancipated itself from such mindset. Nevertheless, the truth consistently causes heartburn to this ecosystem and this instance was no exception.

A popular left-wing figure accused him of being a “collaborator” rather than a journalist. Siddharth attempted to suggest that the journalist had aligned himself with the “Hindutva forces,” merely for expressing pride in his religion and stating a fact.

Failed comedian Rajeev Nigam referred to the event as a “gimmick” while responding to a celebratory post by actor Anupam Kher.

An Islamist even stated that the removal of the disputed structure was “neither a civilizational victory for Hindus nor a detriment to the wider Ummah.” The person then took it a step further by threatening that it would be restored “like Hagia Sophia,” the church that was transformed into a mosque in Turkey and then gloated, “Hinduism eliminated from the historical centers of Hindu civilisation like Punjab, Sindh, Bengal, and Kashmir cannot be reversed.”

This rotten faction laments the demotion of a purported mosque that was constructed over Ram Mandir, portraying it as a case of majoritarianism while simultaneously rejoicing in the murder, rape and brutal acts inflicted upon the native Hindu community by tyrant Muslim marauders.

Suhasinsi Haider tried to create a deceptive equivalence by remarking that the government wishes for non-Hindu institutions to raise the tricolour, while PM Modi and Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, “who have sworn by the constitution will raise a religious flag.” This was also retweeted by Arfa Khanum Sherwani, the chief propagandist of The Wire.

Haider intentionally omitted to mention that there is no nationwide directive, but only state and local regulations for such institutions on specific national occasions like Independence Day. Furthermore, the Ram Mandir program did not coincide with any national day that would justify her statement. More importantly, the Dharam Dhwaj is an integral part of Hindu temples and was central to the religious function.

These people excel in the skill of masking the truth, particularly when it could challenge their carefully crafted propaganda. Similarly, the religious event outraged a leftist to such an extent that the individual demanded sedition charges against Shivshankar.

Another member of the cabal chose to ridicule the emotionally overwhelmed Prime Minister Narendra Modi, mocking that his hands trembled because of his advanced age. Fundamentally, every element of the program and the people associated with it as well as those who took joy in it, faced derogatory remarks.

Likewise, a liberal inquired, “Godi media,” whether the Republic of India, established on 26-01-1950 was replaced by a new Republic in its stead. The hypocrisy is glaring, as he, like all members of his notorious group, conveniently forget that while they denounce the Modi government, their preferred Congress regime attempted to undermine the Republic not only by imposing Emergency but also by undemocratically distorting the preamble (soul of the constitution) while the opposition was illegally thrown behind bars.

Conclusion

The previously mentioned posts offer merely a fleeting insight into the enmity, spite and rage aimed at the sacred occasion, Prime Minister Modi, and those who took pride in it.

Pakistan, Islamists and their leftist-liberal apologist ecosystem dedicated the day to either mourning or hurling outrageous accusations at the collapse of their meticulously constructed narrative, wherein Hindus were compelled to grapple with an inferiority complex, and the nation’s religious and cultural heritage was denigrated to glorify oppressive foreign rulers, whether they were Muslims or British.

PM Modi’s letter to citizens on Constitution Day: Calls everyone to fulfil the dream of Viksit Bharat, put nation first

Dear all, Namaste.

26th November is a day of immense pride for every Indian. It was on this very day in 1949 that the Constituent Assembly adopted the Constitution of India, a sacred document that has continued to guide the nation’s progress with clarity and conviction. That is why, nearly a decade ago, in 2015, the NDA government decided to mark 26th November as Constitution Day.

It is the power of our Constitution that enabled a person like me, coming from a humble and economically disadvantaged family, to serve as the Head of the Government continuously for over 24 years. I still remember the moments in 2014, when I came to Parliament for the first time and bowed, touching the steps of the greatest temple of democracy. Again, in 2019, after the election results, when I entered the Central Hall of Samvidhan Sadan, I bowed and placed the Constitution on my forehead as a mark of reverence. This Constitution has given several others, like me, the power to dream and the strength to work towards it.

On Constitution Day, we remember all the inspiring members of the Constituent Assembly, which was presided over by Dr. Rajendra Prasad, who contributed to the making of the Constitution. We recall the efforts of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar, who chaired the Drafting Committee with remarkable foresight. Several distinguished women members of the Constituent Assembly enriched the Constitution with their thoughtful interventions and visionary perspectives.

My mind goes back to the year 2010. This was when the Constitution of India completed 60 years. Sadly, the occasion did not receive the attention it deserved at a national level. But, to express our collective gratitude and commitment to the Constitution, we organised a ‘Samvidhan Gaurav Yatra’ in Gujarat. Our Constitution was placed on an elephant and I, along with several other people from different walks of life, had the honour of being part of the procession.

When the Constitution completed 75 years, we decided that this would be an extraordinary milestone for the people of India. We had the privilege of organising a special session of Parliament and launching nationwide programmes to commemorate this historic occasion. These programmes witnessed record public participation.
This year’s Constitution Day is special for many reasons.

It marks the 150th birth anniversary of two extraordinary personalities, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel and Bhagwan Birsa Munda. Both of them made monumental contributions to our nation. Sardar Patel’s visionary leadership ensured the political unification of India. It was his inspiration and courage of conviction that guided our steps to act against Article 370 and 35(A). The Constitution of India is now fully in force in Jammu & Kashmir, ensuring all constitutional rights for the people, especially the women and marginalised communities. The life of Bhagwan Birsa Munda continues to inspire India’s resolve to ensure justice, dignity and empowerment for our tribal communities.

This year, we also celebrate the 150th anniversary of Vande Mataram, whose words resonate with the collective resolve of Indians through the ages. At the same time, we commemorate the 350th martyrdom anniversary of Sri Guru Teg Bahadur Ji, whose life and sacrifice continue to illuminate us with courage, compassion and strength.

All these personalities and milestones remind us of the primacy of our duties, something the Constitution also emphasises through a dedicated chapter on Fundamental Duties in Article 51A. These duties guide us on how to collectively achieve social and economic progress. Mahatma Gandhi always emphasised the duties of a citizen. He believed that a duty well performed creates a corresponding right and that real rights are a result of the performance of duty.

25 years have already passed since this century began. In just over two decades from now, we will mark 100 years since freedom from colonial rule. In 2049, it will be a hundred years since the Constitution was adopted. The policies we frame, the decisions we take today and our collective actions will shape the lives of generations to come.

Inspired by this, as we move forward to realise the dream of a Viksit Bharat, we must always place our duties towards our nation foremost in our minds.

Our country has given us so much and this brings out a deep sense of gratitude from within. And, when we live with this feeling, fulfilling our duties becomes integral to our nature. To carry out our duties, it becomes imperative to put in our full capability and dedication in every task. Every action of ours should strengthen the Constitution and further national goals and interests. It is afterall our responsibility to fulfil the dreams envisioned by the framers of our Constitution. When we work with this sense of duty, our nation’s social and economic progress will multiply manifold.

Our Constitution has given us the right to vote. As citizens, it is our duty to never miss the opportunity to vote in national, state and local elections where we are registered. In order to inspire others, we can think of organising special ceremonies every 26th November in schools and colleges to celebrate those youngsters who are turning 18. This way our first-time voters will feel that in addition to being students, they are also active participants in the process of nation-building.

When we inspire our youth with a sense of responsibility and pride, they will remain committed to the values of democracy throughout their lives. This sense of commitment is the foundation of a strong nation.

Let us, on this Constitution Day, reaffirm our pledge to fulfil our duties as citizens of this great nation. In doing so, we can all contribute meaningfully to the building of a Viksit Bharat that is developed and empowered.

Yours,

Narendra Modi

The letter above is by PM Modi to fellow Indians on the occasion of Constitution Day. The letter has been reproduced here.

As Trump moves to designate Muslim Brotherhood as terror group, here’s what you must know about it and its Al Jazeera links

Inflicting a massive blow to Islamic terrorism, US President Donald Trump signed an executive order on 24th November, directing his administration to initiate the process of designating specific chapters of the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) as Foreign Terrorist Organisation (FTO) and Specially Designated Global Terrorists (SDGTs).

The executive order states that Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent shall submit a joint report to the President concerning the designation of any Muslim Brotherhood chapters or other subdivisions, including those in Lebanon, Jordan, and Egypt, as FTO and SDGTs.

This marks the fulfilment of Trump’s first-term ambitions, where he ordered a similar review against the Islamic terror outfit; however, due to bureaucratic resistance, the process could not be completed at that time.

What built momentum for Trump ordering a review of the Muslim Brotherhood are bipartisan congressional efforts, including the Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Designation Act of 2025, the Republican advocacy in general against what they called “transnational Islamist organisation.

While the White House has stated there will not be a blanket label on the entire Muslim Brotherhood, Trump’s move marks a seismic shift. The timing of this is also crucial, given Trump’s efforts to restore peace in Gaza. It must not be forgotten that, contrary to the popular understanding of the Israel-Palestine conflict as a long-standing territorial dispute, it is, in fact, a religious dispute to its core, with territorial claims by both sides being the casus belli.

OpIndia earlier reported about the Palestinian Islamic terror group Hamas claiming the country of Israel as a ‘Waqf’ property in its 1988 Covenant or Charter and vowing to continue Jihad against Jews until the last one of them is killed. Hamas enjoys the support of the Muslim Brotherhood and joined the Palestinian terror group in carrying out airstrikes against Israeli civilians and military after the October 7 2023, massacre.

In its 2017 document, Hamas tried to distance itself from the Muslim Brotherhood, apparently, to better its relations with Egypt. Hamas also softened its stance on fighting the Jews by distinguishing between Zionists and Jews. The Islamic terror group’s actions since then have exposed their duplicity. The indiscriminate killing of Jews on 7th October 2023 laid bare Hamas’s hypocrisy and hatred for Jews.

It is essential to note that formally designating the Muslim Brotherhood as a terror group has always been difficult for the US government. The organisation is decentralised, with different branches operating in multiple countries, many of which function independently. Because of this structure, legal experts and intelligence officials in Washington have often found it challenging to apply a blanket terrorist label to the entire movement.

Apparently, due to this reason, the executive order signed by Trump mentions that only specific chapters of the Muslim Brotherhood will be designated FTO or SDGTs if required.

Muslim Brotherhood: From socio-political movement to global Islamist network

Founded in 1928 in Ismailia, Egypt, the Muslim Brotherhood or Ikhwan al-Muslimin, remains one of the most influential Islamic political movements in the world. It was founded by Hassan al-Banna, a teacher and Islamic scholar, on the premise of anti-Western colonialism and the supposed erosion of Islamic values in the post-Ottoman world. Al-Banna launched the Muslim Brotherhood as a pan-Islamist movement which focused on charity and Islamist advocacy.

In its early years, the Muslim Brotherhood filled gaps left by weak and nonchalant governments by building schools, hospitals and mosques for the poor and illiterate people in Egypt while also preaching Islam and ‘Tawhid’ (Allah’s oneness and supremacy) as some antidote to secularism and imperialism. The motto of the Muslim Brotherhood makes abundantly clear that it may not have initially been linked to violence, ‘Jihad’ has always been its way.

The Muslim Brotherhood’s motto says, “Allah is our objective; the Prophet is our leader; the Quran is our law; jihad is our way; dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope.”

MB ballooned into hundreds of thousands of members by the 1930s and resisted British rule. In 1936, the Islamist outfit entered politics, opposing the secular Wafd Party and organising protests during the Second World War. However, MB’s paramilitary wings, the “Secret Apparatus” also known as the Special Apparatus or al-Nizam al-Khas, engaged in violence, political assassinations, and subversive activities. In 1948, the Secret Apparatus members assassinated Prime Minister Mahmoud El Nokrashy Pasha for banning the Islamist outfit. In 1949, al-Banna was murdered by the Egyptian Secret Police in retaliation for Pasha’s murder.

The members of the Muslim Brotherhood’s Secret Apparatus used to undergo heavy physical and military training. They were trained to use firearms and carry out underground operations. Emphasising deception and secrecy (Taqqiya), the Jihadists belonging to the Apparatus infiltrate and subvert political parties, armies, intelligence, media, educational institutions and even NGOs.

Under the leadership of Sayyid Qutb, who was executed in 1966, the Muslim Brotherhood became radicalised further. Through his writings, especially Milestones (Ma’alim fi al-Tariq), Qutb promoted concepts like Takfir (declaring Muslims as apostates) and argued that modern nation-states are ‘un-Islamic’. Qutb went on to propagate that the Muslim world had reverted to pre-Islamic ‘ignorance’ due to the failure of leaders and governments to fully implement the Islamic Sharia law.

Qutb’s radical, or rather more pure, Islamic viewpoints resonated with jihadists widely and inspired many Takfiri groups who used Takfir as a justification for killing Muslims they deemed apostates or not Muslim enough. Be it Egyptian Islamic Jihad or later the Al-Qaeda, all drew inspiration from Qutb’s doctrines of Jahiliyyah (ignorance), takfir, and Jihad to justify violence against non-Muslims and Muslims they deemed infidels.

What turbocharged the Muslim Brotherhood’s ambitions was the Arab Spring. In 2012, MB won the elections and picked Mohamed Morsi as President. However, in 2013, a military coup led by then-General Abdel Fattah el-Sisi ousted Morsi. The Islamist outfit was banned and was declared a terrorist organisation.

Although the Muslim Brotherhood claims to have abandoned violence and embraced a democratic path to pursue their agenda, high-ranking defectors and independent expert analysis show that Secret Apparatus remains operational through clandestine committees.

The Muslim Brotherhood continues to be seen as a threat to political stability by many authoritarian governments in the Middle East and North Africa. Recently,  Texas Governor Greg Abbott announced that the Muslim Brotherhood, including the Council on American-Islamic Relations, would be considered “foreign terrorist and transnational criminal organisations.”

The UAE, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Bahrain, and Russia have already designated the Brotherhood as a terrorist organisation. Jordan banned the group in April after arresting people linked to the movement who were accused of plotting attacks using rockets and drones. In January this year, the UAE blacklisted 8 United Kingdom-based organisations for their ties to the Islamic terror outfit ‘Muslim Brotherhood.’

The disorganised outer structure of the Muslim Brotherhood allows it to maintain existence and operations while making it difficult for countries against Islamic terrorism and extremism to take concrete action against it. In short, the Muslim Brotherhood’s key to survival is coalescing ‘social welfare’, politics and terrorism as per their convenience.

Trump’s renewed efforts to designate the Muslim Brotherhood are not without challenges. Egypt’s ban on the MB in 2013, though it granted an immediate relief, ended up contributing to a massive surge in violent and extremist groups. Salafi-jihadist groups emerged in the Sinai Peninsula, including the ISIS affiliates.

Muslim Brotherhood and the Al-Jazeera connection

While Doha-based Al Jazeera is not a declared arm of the Muslim Brotherhood, it is a known megaphone of the Islamist organisation. In 2017, Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Egypt had a diplomatic fallout with Qatar over the latter’s backing of the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas. Saudi Arabia had also demanded the closure of Al-Jazeera and its affiliates, as it accused Qatar of using Al-Jazeera to incite Islamist extremism and support jihadist groups like the Muslim Brotherhood. Back then, Al Jazeera had broadcast messages by exiled Muslim Brotherhood leader Yusuf al-Qaradawi.

Al-Jazeera’s biased and propaganda-riddled reporting during the Arab Spring must also not be forgotten.

In January 2024, a Yemeni-British journalist named Adnan Al-Ameri revealed how Al Jazeera carries out the agenda of the Muslim Brotherhood at the behest of the Qatari government.

Al-Ameri told Israeli newspaper The Jerusalem Post that he worked for the youth channel of Al Jazeera, named JeemTV, in Doha.

While he was initially unaware of the sinister agenda of the Qatari mouthpiece, the realisation dawned on him in the mid-2010s. At that time, Al-Ameri’s home country of Yemen, captured by Houthis, was being bombed by a coalition of Gulf States led by the UAE and Saudi Arabia.

The two nations were also behind the excommunication of Qatar by other Gulf States. When the civil war broke out in Yemen, the southern part of the country was sympathetic to both the UAE and Saudi Arabia.

The Yemeni-British journalist pointed out how one needs to parrot the propaganda of the Muslim Brotherhood to work at Al Jazeera. “When you work for their news channel, they need you to promote their Muslim Brotherhood agendas, and if you’re not there ideologically, they’ll make sure to buy you off,” Adnan Al-Ameri remarked, adding that Al-Jazeera backs Hamas as well.

Al-Jazeera’s persistent anti-India propaganda

The Qatar-based Islamist propaganda outlet has been peddling biased narratives against India and Hindus. Be it the 2020 anti-Hindu Delhi Riots, the Citizenship Amendment Act, or the Ayodhya Ram Mandir issue, Al-Jazeera has continuously been pushing a Muslim victimhood narrative and villainising the Hindu majority of India.

Al-Jazeera has a knack for concocting fake Muslim victimhood narratives while downplaying the real incidents of Islamic terrorism and extremism. OpIndia has reported earlier how Al-Jazeera downplayed the 2002 Godhra massacre and tried to peddle the Muslim victimhood bogey, even though in reality,  a total of 31 Islamists were found guilty of setting the Sabarmati Express on fire, which claimed the lives of 59 Hindus (mostly women and children).

Even during the Islamist onslaught against Hindus in Bangladesh in 2024, Al Jazeera tried to pass off the incidents of Muslim mobs killing and raping Hindus, looting Hindu houses and desecrating Hindu temples as acts of ‘political retribution’. The Islamist propaganda outlet even claimed that Indian media houses reporting the attacks on Hindus in Bangladesh are Islamophobic.

Al-Jazeera also echoes the anti-India position on the Kashmir issue and even downplays the horrors endured by the Kashmiri Pandits.

Al-Jazeera has also been peddling falsehoods and propaganda against Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, especially concerning the 2002 Gujarat Riots when he was the state’s Chief Minister. This continues even as the Supreme Court gave a clean chit to Modi long back.

The Qatari propaganda outlet has also been platforming individuals inherently hateful towards India and Hindus. Al-Jazeera has a specific page on Kashmir where they try to show India as a villain and oppressor, and also ridiculous equivalence with the situation in war-torn Palestine.

In more recent months, Al-Jazeera reported about the ‘I Love Muhammad’ row in India by maliciously concealing facts and portraying Muslims as victims of persecution.

In April this year, when Muslim mobs protesting against the Waqf Amendment Bill attacked Hindus in West Bengal’s Murshidabad, Al-Jazeera downplayed the Islamist atrocities and even attempted to contextualise Islamist violence as ‘protest’ against the Waqf law.

Moreover, during Operation Sindoor in May this year, when India attacked Islamic terror establishments inside Pakistan after the Pahalgam attack, Al-Jazeera peddled pro-Pakistan narrative. It even published fake news that Pakistani forces had captured an Indian Air Force pilot, Squadron Leader Shivani Singh. A claim both the Pakistani and Indian sides denied, and months later, Singh’s picture with President Droupadi Murmu surfaced on social media, further exposing the Qatari Islamist propaganda outlet’s lies.

Shadow of the Muslim Brotherhood in India

While the Muslim Brotherhood does not essentially have a direct presence in India, its ideology has a profound impact on Islamist outfits in India. Not to forget, the Muslim Brotherhood inspired Maulana Abul Ala Maududi’s Jamaat-e-Islami in the 1940s. Banned Islamic terror outfits like the Student Islamic Movement of India (SIMI) and Popular Front of India (PFI), both of which have been involved in Jihadist attacks against Hindus and are working on plans to turn India into an Islamic nation, draw inspiration from Muslim Brotherhood tactics. Both relied on radicalising youth, pushing an anti-secular agenda, and framing the majority community and mainstream government as ‘oppressors of Muslims’ who must be fought against.

Many Kashmiri Islamic terror outfits are also reported to be influenced by the Muslim Brotherhood, which has historically backed separatist movements and advocated an anti-India narrative. Besides providing intellectual scaffolding, the Muslim Brotherhood-linked groups are also reported to be involved in providing financial and propaganda support to anti-India Jihadist elements.

Back in 2021, the Muslim Brotherhood had launched a #BoycottIndianProducts campaign against India, targeting India’s economic interests. The #BoycottIndianProducts campaign on social media was started after the eviction drive against encroachers in Assam, which had turned violent after some encroachers had attacked the police. Holding the government responsible for the incident, people mostly from Pakistan and Middle Eastern countries,, including Turkey, Egypt and Iraq, had launched the campaign to boycott products made in India.

Unsurprisingly, ‘news articles’ were also published that promoted this anti-India trend by several media houses connected to the Muslim Brotherhood, including Al-Jazeera.

In 2023, the Muslim Brotherhood conspired to paint a bad picture of India under the guise of defending the honour of the Islamic prophet Muhammad. Back then, the Digital Forensics, Research and Analytics Centre (DFRAC) reported that the Muslim Brotherhood also runs a smear campaign against the Hindus who work in the Gulf countries.

Donald Trump’s hypocrisy in dealing with Islamic terrorism is evident. He mollycoddles designated terrorist-turned-politician Sharaa of Syria and the Islamic terror-sponsoring army regime in Pakistan while acting against the Muslim Brotherhood. However, Trump’s action against the Muslim Brotherhood after the ordered review might help India in its fight against Islamic terrorism and foreign networks backing it.

‘Till Brahmins don’t give up their daughters, reservations will continue’: Read about hateful and casteist IAS officer Santosh Verma, previously jailed for fraud

Bhopal witnessed a major controversy on Sunday, 23rd November, after senior IAS officer Santosh Verma, who was recently elected as the state president of Anusuchit Jati Evam Janjati Adhikari Evam Karmachari Sangh (AJAKS), made an extremely objectionable and casteist remark during a public event. The comment, made at the Ambedkar Maidan in the state capital, quickly snowballed into a statewide outrage, raising questions on his intentions, the organisation’s image, and the growing caste tensions in the political environment.

Verma said that reservation in India should continue until a Brahmin gives his daughter to his son in marriage or forms a relationship with him. A video of this statement went viral within hours, and the reaction was immediate, intense, and in many cases, deeply worrying.

Speaking on whether reservation should be granted on economic basis he said, “until a Brahmin donates his daughter to my son or has a relationship with him, reservations should continue.”

Many people have called the remark casteist, misogynistic, and deliberately provocative. Others believe it is part of a dangerous narrative that fuels division rather than strengthening social harmony. At a time when reservation is already a sensitive issue, this kind of statement has raised alarms across communities. 

This report looks at what exactly happened, how different groups reacted, and why Santosh Verma’s past is also being discussed again after this latest controversy.

Where the controversial statement was made

The incident took place during the provincial convention of AJAKS, held at Ambedkar Maidan in Tulsi Nagar. The organisation represents SC-ST employees and officers working in various government departments, and its events usually discuss issues like reservation, promotions, workplace harassment, and representation.

During his speech, Verma started talking about economic reservation and social discrimination. But within minutes, his tone changed, and he made the remark that has now caused a political storm.

In the viral video, Verma is seen saying that reservation should continue until upper-caste families, especially Brahmins, accept SC communities as equals in social relationships. The way he framed it, “until a Brahmin donates his daughter to my son or forms a relationship”, has been widely condemned.

The reference to “donating a daughter” struck many as insensitive, patriarchal, and totally out of place in modern society. Several women’s groups have questioned the mindset behind such a statement, saying it treats women as objects rather than individuals with agency.

People are also asking whether reservation, a constitutional tool meant for social justice, should ever be discussed in terms of personal relationships or caste revenge.

Anger from Brahmin organisations and demand for action

The president of the Akhil Bharatiya Brahmin Samaj, Pushpendra Mishra, called the comment “highly condemnable” and demanded immediate action from Chief Minister Dr Mohan Yadav.

Mishra said that Verma’s remarks insulted the entire Brahmin community and that legal action should be taken against him under relevant sections. If the government failed to act, he warned of a state-wide agitation.

Similarly, Dr Shailendra Vyas, head of the Brahmin Sabha Madhya Pradesh, said the remark reflected a “cheap and divisive mindset.” He said that someone holding a high administrative post should behave responsibly, not make statements that can create tensions.

He added that if the government didn’t take action, the community would be forced to take matters into its own hands. His response itself showed how quickly caste anger can escalate when provocative comments are made from public platforms.

Sharp criticism from other employee groups too

It wasn’t just Brahmin organisations that opposed Verma’s remark. Employee associations from different castes and communities also condemned it.

The president of the Ministry Employees Association, engineer Sudhir Nayak, said Verma’s words insulted the entire upper-caste community and went against the spirit of equality. He emphasised that marriage is a personal choice and that daughters are not objects that can be “donated” or exchanged.

He reminded the audience that Indian society has already changed a lot. He cited examples such as Dr B.R. Ambedkar’s marriage to Savita Ambedkar, who came from a Brahmin family, and former Union Minister Ram Vilas Paswan’s marriage to Reena Sharma. These examples, he said, show that change should be natural, not forced through provocative statements.

Another association, the Class III Employees Union, also criticised Verma. Their general secretary, Umashankar Tiwari, said that statements like these create unnecessary tension among colleagues who already come from diverse castes and religions and work together every day. He asked why a platform meant for government employees was used for divisive rhetoric.

Many employee groups expressed concern that such comments destroy the atmosphere of cooperation inside government offices. When a senior leader makes such remarks, it becomes difficult for subordinates to trust each other.

Santosh Verma’s controversial past

As the controversy grew, many people started revisiting Santosh Verma’s past. This isn’t the first time he has been accused of misconduct.

In 2021, Verma was arrested in Indore on charges of criminal intimidation, harassment of a woman, and even producing fake court documents to secure a promotion from the state cadre to the IAS cadre.

According to a report by The Times of India, Verma created two fake court orders, one a settlement order and another an acquittal order. These documents carried the date of 6th October, 2020, but the judge was actually on leave that day, raising suspicions.

A departmental inquiry confirmed that only one genuine order existed, while Verma had submitted two. When the woman involved in the case complained to the Chief Secretary, the investigation deepened, and Verma was eventually arrested after 12 hours of questioning.

He had then claimed that the woman herself provided him the documents, but this argument collapsed during the inquiry.

Apart from the forgery case, Verma’s personal conduct has also been discussed before. Several reports claim that he has had multiple affairs, even while being married, and that complaints related to inappropriate relationships have been filed against him in the past as well. His reputation, many say, has always been controversial.

This history is now being linked with his latest statement, with critics saying that someone with such a record should not be leading an organisation representing thousands of employees.

When the leader is questioned, what happens to the organisation?

Verma’s new role as the state president of AJAKS has brought additional scrutiny. AJAKS is an influential organisation representing SC-ST employees across Madhya Pradesh. People expect its leaders to speak responsibly, especially on sensitive issues like reservation and social justice.

But Verma’s comment has placed the organisation in an uncomfortable position. Many fear that AJAKS could get branded as a divisive organisation even though past presidents have never made such statements.

This is why several employees believe the matter is not just about one individual, it affects the credibility of the entire organisation. When the person leading a major association uses caste-loaded language, it spreads negativity among thousands of employees, especially at a time when caste relations are already tense in many parts of the country.

When ‘social justice’ turns daughters into bargaining chips

Santosh Verma’s remark about “Brahmin daughters” mirrors a deeply problematic pattern seen in modern social activism, where women are reduced to symbols and bargaining tools to push larger ideological agendas. Much like how certain narratives project interfaith harmony by placing Hindu women at the centre of grand social experiments, Verma’s statement treats daughters not as individuals with agency but as instruments to “prove” social equality. This kind of rhetoric wrongly shifts the burden of social reform onto women’s bodies and personal lives.

What makes the remark particularly dangerous is that it echoes a long-standing tendency to romanticise social cohesion while ignoring uncomfortable ground realities. Just as glossy narratives promote idealised versions of inter-community relationships without acknowledging real-world conflicts and vulnerabilities faced by women, Verma’s statement trivialises the lived complexity of caste relations. It converts a constitutional tool like reservation into a crude, humiliating social test centred around marriage and family honour.

At its core, Verma’s statement reflects the same flawed mindset that views women as pawns in ideological battles, whether for caste “equality,” religious “harmony,” or political symbolism. Equality cannot be built on the symbolic “sacrifice” of daughters, nor can social justice be achieved through provocative, dehumanising language. When public officials speak like this, they don’t empower marginalised communities; they deepen mistrust, harden identities, and push society further away from genuine, voluntary social change.

A statement that threatens social harmony

India is a diverse country where castes, religions, and communities live together, study together, and work together. Reservation was introduced for social justice, not for revenge or caste retaliation.

But Verma’s statement links reservation to personal relationships and caste pride, which is not just offensive but also dangerous. It sends a message that empowerment should come at the cost of social tension, which was never the intention behind reservation.

If leaders continue making such inflammatory remarks, the consequences will be felt everywhere, offices, schools, families, and even politics. The gap between communities could widen, and trust could break down.

In workplaces, upper-caste employees might start feeling targeted or suspicious. Lower-caste employees might feel emboldened by provocative rhetoric rather than constructive dialogue. And ordinary citizens will find themselves caught in the middle of unnecessary caste disputes.

When Verma’s history, fake documents, criminal intimidation, complaints from women, is viewed along with this latest statement, many see a clear pattern. His latest comment isn’t an isolated mistake. It fits into a long timeline of questionable decisions and controversial behaviour. A person who breaks the law builds his identity by dividing society. Previous AJAKS presidents have never made such statements, which shows that Verma’s thinking is personal, but its impact is collective.

South Africa coach Shukri Conrad says ‘we wanted India to grovel’: Read why his remarks has sparked massive outrage

Cricket is a game obsessed with numbers: runs, wickets, overs, and sessions. But every once in a while, a single word carries more weight than an entire scorecard. Shukri Conrad’s remark after Day 4 of the second India-South Africa Test in Guwahati that South Africa wanted India to “grovel” was one such word. 

And in no time, social media was up in arms. Conrad’s comment triggered massive outrage online and prompted newsroom discussions on the choice of words used by the coach of a team that has dominated the ongoing test series against India. Some of the fans were simply livid with the Indian cricket team’s head coach, Gautam Gambhir, the support staff, and the players for putting us in a position where we had to swallow insulting remarks from a visiting team.

When asked in the press conference about South Africa’s strategy to bat longer and not put India into bat earlier, Conrad said, “We obviously looked at how best we were going to use the new ball, because in the morning we still wanted a newish, hardish ball.”

He further added, “What we felt is that when the shadows come across the wicket in the evening, there’s something in it for the quick bowlers, so we didn’t want to declare too early and not be able to use that.”

“And then, obviously, we wanted the Indians to spend as much time on their feet out in the field, we wanted them to really grovel, to steal a phrase, bat them completely out the game, and then say to them ‘come and survive on the last day and an hour this evening’,” added Conrad, explaining the rationale behind South Africa batting longer than required.

In modern cricket slang, “grovel” is sometimes loosely used to imply subjugation through skill, making a team chase leather, bow for long spells, or survive under duress. Conrad likely meant it in this sporting sense: make India toil, physically and mentally, until resistance bends. Yet cricket is not played in a vacuum. Words in this game don’t float free of history. They carry their own bruises.

But his comments instantly triggered outrage on social media. On X, several users, including journalists, expressed shock and condemned the choice of words used by Conrad, pointing out that “grovel” is not a neutral cricketing term but one with deep racial and historical baggage.

But how did the seemingly benign word ‘grovel’ get its racial undertones in cricketing parlance? What was the incident that permanently etched ‘grovel’ as a racial slur never to be used again, until Conrad did for Team India?

When England captain Tony Greig used ‘grovel’ for West Indies

The word “grovel” is inseparable from 1976, from Tony Greig and the West Indies. When Greig, a white South African-born England captain, openly declared that England would make the West Indies “grovel,” it was not received as mere sledging. It was heard as racial and colonial condescension. Clive Lloyd, Viv Richards, and an entire Caribbean side understood it as an attempt to reduce proud, newly assertive Black cricketers to something beneath dignity. What followed wasn’t just a cricketing response, but a cultural and political statement: the rise of the most feared dynasty in cricket history.

That is why Conrad’s words cut deeper than he may have intended. South Africa, of all nations, cannot escape the shadow of apartheid when it comes to racial language. Even though Conrad himself comes from a marginalised community within South Africa’s racial hierarchy, the nation’s institutional memory still makes such words volatile. For Indian fans, already sensitive to historical patterns of condescension toward Asian and African teams, it sounded like an old colonial echo resurfacing in modern garb.

There is also an irony here that history loves. Tony Greig’s “grovel” comment didn’t weaken the West Indies; it forged them into something terrifying. England didn’t make the Windies grovel; the Windies made the world tremble. Cricket’s past teaches us that humiliation, when weaponised through words, often boomerangs.

But will Conrad’s remark spark a revolution of that scale in Indian cricket, which is currently in shambles? The Indian cricket team is already 0-1 down against the touring South Africa. In the ongoing match, they have a mountain of 522 runs to climb and emerge victorious. With just a single day left in the match, victory is no longer a realistic ambition. Survival itself now appears aspirational. It would take nothing short of a minor miracle for India to bat through the day and salvage pride from the wreckage of this collapse.

But the entire episode does serve as a reminder: Cricket is more than two teams battling out to emerge victorious. It is more than wins and losses. It is struggle. A coach explaining a declaration strategy probably did not intend to reopen old wounds, but in a sport whose history is soaked in colonialism, and racism, some words are never free of their past.