Home Blog Page 1747

‘Journalist’ turned politician Prashant Kanojia rehashes Pulwama rant of Opposition to whitewash Hamas crimes, claims Israel killed its own people for political gain

A day after Hamas terrorists unleashed carnage in Israel, ‘journalist’ turned politician Prashant Kanojia claimed on Sunday (8th October) that the terror attack was orchestrated by the Benjamin Netanyahu-led Israeli government for political mileage.

In a tweet, he alleged, “Elections in Israel are going to take place soon. The current Israeli Prime Minister is also a coward like the Prime Minister of another nation. He also wants to attack his own citizens and win elections.”

Kanojia, who was previously arrested for peddling fake news, further said, “This is just my speculation but anything and everything is possible in politics.” It must be mentioned that elections in Israel were conducted in November 2022 and the next elections are scheduled to take place in October 2026.

As such, his conspiracy theory is based on the lie of an upcoming election (which is meant to take place 3 years later). Kanojia made the outrageous claims in order to pacify his follower base of Hamas sympathisers, who have been leaving no stone unturned to downplay the terror attack on Israel.

The former ‘journalist’, who now works as the National Campaign Incharge of Rashtriya Lok DAL (RLD), also disseminated the conspiracy theory about the supposed involvement of Prime Minister Narendra Modi in the 2019 Pulwama terror attack.

Without taking names, he insinuated that the Indian government killed its own people and somehow the Benjamin Netanyahu-led Israeli government is following suit to win elections. Following outrage on social media, Kanojia deleted his tweet without citing any apology.

Pulwama attack and the never-ending conspiracy theory of Opposition leaders

On February 14, 2019, a convoy of vehicles carrying Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) personnel to Srinagar via National Highway 44 came under a suicide bombing attack.

A 22-year-old Adil Ahmad Dar, a Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) terrorist from Kakapora in Jammu and Kashmir, rammed his explosive-laden vehicle into a bus carrying the CRPF personnel. More than 40 of our jawans were martyred.

The terrorist organization Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), based in Pakistan, claimed responsibility for the attack. They also posted a video of the Islamic terrorist Adil Ahmad Dar, who had joined the outfit in 2018.

In an official statement, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) stated that Pakistan was responsible for assisting terrorist attacks and that JeM founder Maulana Masood Azhar had been “given the freedom to target India.” Soon after, the opposition leaders tried to pin the blame on Narendra Modi instead and tried to spin conspiracy theories around the attack.

The anti-Modi sentiment and the fear of getting wiped out from the political spectrum ahead of the 2019 general elections were so deep-rooted in the opposition leaders that they went on to accuse Modi of executing this brutal attack for BJP’s political gains. Many of them also questioned the role of the armed forces during this attack. 

Congress leader Navjot Singh Sidhu, who often expresses his love towards the terrorist state of Pakistan issued a shocking clean chit to Pakistan by claiming that ‘Terrorism has no country’ and indicated that Pakistan has no role in the Pulwama terrorist attack.

While condemning the heinous terrorist attack on the CRPF soldiers, Navjot Singh Sidhu said that terrorism has no country, giving a clean chit to Pakistan despite Jaish-e-Mohammed, a terrorist group based in Pakistan and backed by the Pakistani establishment, taking the responsibility for the attack on CRPF soldiers at Pulwama.

Former Congress MP from Uttar Pradesh’s Rampur, Noor Bano, during an interaction with the media leveled charges against security forces and accused them of exercising negligence prior to Pulwama terrorist attack.

“What happened was unfortunate, and the incident affects all of us. We do not know how BJP will churn out benefits from this incident. They will exploit the incident. It is the responsibility of the armed forces, to protect people. I saw on television, that they had prior information, but then how they failed to avert the attack?” Congress leader Noor Bano was quoted by reports. 

Gujarat Congress leader from Junagadh, Vinu Amipara also parroted similar lines. He said, “Whenever there are elections, they(BJP) do something like this. Earlier, Godhra carnage was carried out (before the 2002 Gujarat elections) and today, the Pulwama attack is also suspicious. The soldiers are murdered. When Congress comes to power, then we will investigate this.”

Indian Air Force carried out an air strike at Balakot in Pakistan after the Pulwama terror attack. Senior Congress leader Digvijay Singh doubted the surgical strikes instantly while trying to downplay the Pulwama terror attack. He started with a disclaimer that we are proud of our armed forces and have complete faith in them.

He lauded the armed forces for the service they provide in protecting the nation. However, he added, following the ‘Pulwama accident’, reports in various foreign media regarding the “air strike” have created doubt in his mind. This apparently made him question the credibility of the Indian government as well.

Downplaying terror attacks or absolving the actual terrorists and pinning the blame on someone he doesn’t agree with politically is not something new for Singh. In 2010, months after the 26/11 Mumbai terror attack, Digvijaya Singh, along with filmmaker Mahesh Bhatt and others launched a book that claimed that the Mumbai terror attacks were an RSS conspiracy.

Just a week after the dastardly attack by the terrorist belonging to the Pakistan-based Jaish-e-Muhammad claimed the lives of 40 CRPF soldiers, the Congress spokesperson Randeep Surjewala rubbed salt on their wounds by alleging that the terrorist was a ‘Home-grown so-called terrorist’. While addressing a presser, the Congress spokesperson insulted the sacrifice of the martyred soldiers by referring to the terrorist who killed them as a ‘so-called terrorist’. Surjewala also called into question the functioning of the Armed forces when he called the terrorist as ‘Home-grown’, providing an alibi to Pakistan.

Congress leader Kapil Sibal joined the bandwagon after the air strikes. He tweeted, “Modiji: Is international media: 1) New York Times 2) London based Jane’s Information Group 3) Washinton Post 4) Daily Telegraph 5) The Guardian 6) Reuters reporting no proof of militant losses at Balakot pro-Pakistan? You are guilty of politicizing terror?”

While addressing a press conference, Goa Congress leader Chellakumar alleged that the Pulwama attack was orchestrated by PM Modi. Chellakumar said, “People are not fools anymore. This man will go to any extent. Because, Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi and Amit Shah together… even recently video clipping has come out, even the Godhra incident was planned by BJP and stuff like that. Their own man has said that, not some Congress leader. I will not take the name but someone from the BJP circle has claimed that the Godhra incident was manipulated and orchestrated by the BJP. If it is so, why not this Pulwama incident also? They have identified all the jawan’s bodies. Where is the terrorist’s body? Till now they could not show to the people. So he is not a public representative. Not a public leader.”

The former Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir, Mehbooba Mufti, also attempted to justify the horrible atrocity committed by terrorist Ahmad Dar and pinned the blame on the government for its ‘muscular approach’ forcing gullible youths in the Valley to take up arms.

Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal also questioned Balakot air strikes. He tweeted, “Is the army lying according to Amit Shah? The army has clearly said that whether someone died or not or how many died, cannot be said. Are Amit Shah and BJP telling lies to the army for their electoral gains? The country has faith in the army. Do Amit Shah and the BJP have no faith in the army?”

Sam Pitroda, one of the accused in the National Herald ‘cheating and breach of trust’ scam and one of the most trusted aides of Congress President Rahul Gandhi, demanded proof of the Balakot airstrikes carried out by the Indian Air Force on Jaish-e-Mohammad terror camps in Pakistan.

He questioned, did we really kill 300 people? “I don’t know that. As a citizen, I am entitled to know. And if I ask, it is my duty to ask. That does not mean I am not a nationalist. That does not mean I am on this side or that side. We need to know the facts. If you say 300 people were killed, I need to know that. We all need to know that. The people of India need to know that. And then the global media says that nobody was killed. I look bad as an Indian citizen,” he said.

As the nation remembers the martyrs of the Pulwama terror attack, people should not forget that these leaders from the opposition parties accused Narendra Modi of this attack, questioned the role of the Indian army, peddled a narrative that the Indian army was responsible for the suicide bomber of Pulwama joining a terrorist outfit, and finally questioned the valor of the Indian Air Force after the Balakot air strike.

Appearing for Class 10, and 12 board exams twice a year is optional, not mandatory: Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan

0

On 8th October, Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan reassured students and parents that the new proposal allowing students of Class 10 and 12 to appear twice in a year has been done to alleviate their stress level arising out of fear of a single opportunity. In an interview with PTI, he asserted that appearing twice a year for the Class 10 and 12 board exams will now be an optional facility for students, instead of being a mandatory requirement

While speaking to PTI, the Education Minister covered many issues that stress students and their parents including the concerns around the mushrooming of ‘dummy schools’, student suicides in Kota, and the Central Advisory Board of Education (CABE). 

Earlier in August, the Ministry of Education announced the New Curriculum Framework (NCF). As per the NCF, board examinations will be held twice a year so that students have enough time to prepare and retain the best scores.

Explaining this proposal further, Pradhan said, “The students will have the option of appearing for the exams twice a year, just like the engineering entrance exam JEE. They can choose the best score…but it will be completely optional, no compulsion.”

He added that the students often get stressed thinking they lost a year, their chance is gone or they could have performed better. He emphasised that the option is being introduced to reduce the stress caused by the fear of a single opportunity.

Assuring that it is not mandatory, he said, “If any student feels that he is completely prepared and is satisfied with the score in the first set of exams, he can choose not to appear for the next exams. Nothing will be mandatory.” 

He stated that the proposal has received positive feedback from students and announced that the Ministry is trying that the board exams are conducted twice a year from 2024 itself.

Earlier during the COVID-19 pandemic, the board exams for classes 10 and 12 were split into two terms as a one-time measure. Consequently, the old format of the year-end examination resumed this year. 

Collective responsibility to alleviate Examination stress

The Education Minister highlighted PM Modi’s session with the young students advising them not to get stressed out about examinations. He said, “In a country where Prime Minister Narendra Modi himself counsels the students on how to remain stress-free during exams in his annual ‘Pariksha Pe Charcha’, such an examination reform is necessary. He tells students not to be scared of exams but to defeat them, ‘pariksha ki pariskha lo’ (take the exam’s exam).” 

Speaking about the record number of student suicides reported in Rajasthan’s Kota this year, Pradhan reiterated that it is a very sensitive issue adding that it is our collective responsibility to ensure that the students are stress-free. 

According to official figures, this year alone around 25 students have committed suicide which is the highest ever for the country’s coaching hub. 

He stressed concerns about the issue of ‘dummy schools’ emphasising that time has come to have a serious discussion about this issue. 

He said, “The issue cannot be ignored. Although the number of such students is not very high as compared to the total number of students… the time has come to have serious discussions and deliberations on the subject.”  

Notably, several competitive exam aspirants enroll themselves in schools in their home states while they attend coaching classes in Kota. Despite never attending full-time schools, they appear for board exams. 

Numerous experts have raised concerns about the existence of ‘dummy schools’. They maintain that students who do not attend school may face hindrances in their personal development, leading to feelings of isolation and stress.

Educational Institutions and Organisational structure

Responding to the query about why the Central Advisory Board of Education (CABE) hasn’t met in the last three years, Pradhan said, “CABE is being reconstituted”. 

He added, “The older version of CABE was very broad…demands of today’s education system are different. At a time when we are making a paradigm shift with the new National Education Policy, CABE also needs to be remodeled. At the end of the day, CABE will review what is being introduced now, be it a new curriculum, new credit framework, accreditation, or any other reform.”

The minister also noted that the establishment of offshore campuses for two IITs, namely Delhi and Madras, is currently in advanced stages, and discussions are underway with several other countries that have shown interest.

Regarding this, Pradhan said, “The Ministry of External Affairs is coordinating it and various kinds of options and combinations are being deliberated upon. (External Affairs) Minister (S) Jaishankar himself is looking into it. I am also with him.” 

He stated that the guidelines for foreign universities to establish campuses in India are currently being discussed and will be officially announced in the near future.

Further in the interview with PTI, the Minister was questioned about his stance on the choice made by specific states, such as Karnataka and West Bengal, to not implement the National Education Policy (NEP). 

Pradhan noted, “Their objections are not academic but political. I have still not been able to understand what their actual objection is about. West Bengal has taken out an alternative document. We have seen that and it is 99 percent similar to the NEP.” 

Pradhan, who also serves as the Minister of Skill Development, assured a strong collaboration between the ministries of education and skill development to create a work-ready generation.

He added, “To achieve this, we are creating synergy between education and skills to provide students with both academic and practical skills. Today, there are close to 1,000 skill hubs with one lakh candidates enrolled in them. Going forward, we plan to set up 5,000 such centres.” 

“F*** Israel, F*** Jews”: Hamas supporting mob hurls flares at Sydney Opera House amid chants of “Allah Hu Akbar”

Supporters of the terrorist group Hamas gathered in hundreds in Sydney on October 9th (local time) to march to the Sydney Opera House after it was lit in blue and white in support of Israel. Islamic chants like “Allah Ho Akbar” echoed on the streets of Sydney celebrating the murder of hundreds of Israelis and other foreign nationals.

A Muslim preacher celebrating the Hamas terrorist attacks on Israel and incites crowds of Muslims (Source: clowndownunder/Twitter)

In a video shared by the Australian Jewish Association on X, formerly Twitter, the mob appears to be attacking the Sydney Opera House with flares following the rally. Subsequently, the lighting up of the Opera House in Israeli flag colours was delayed by an hour.

According to a report by Daily Mail Australia, some of the vandals were masked and hurled lit flares at more than 100 cops who were lined up to prevent them from entering the Opera House.

The terrorist sympathisers could be heard chanting abusive, vulgar, and anti-semitic language. “F* Israel, F* Jews, F*** Albanese, Allah Hu Akbar,” the mob yelled while attempting to set the Israeli flag on fire before stomping it and ripping it to shreds.

Banners carrying messages like “Free Palestine” were waved by the mob. Moreover, New South Wales Greens MP Jenny Leong also took to X, formerly Twitter, supporting the pro-terrorist protest in her country.

At least three individuals reportedly attempting to raise the Israeli flag at the pro-Hamas protests in Sydney were detained by the police. The police had warned the Jewish people not to visit areas around the Sydney Opera House in view of the violent protests

A full-blown Muslim victimisation rally was organised by the Palestine Action Group Sydney, which assembled at Town Hall before marching to the Opera House. Many reportedly held signs including “stop persecuting Muslims” and “stand for the oppressed”.

Moreover, an indigenous community engagement officer at the University of Sydney likened the support to the terrorist cause of Palestine to the experience of the aboriginal people in Australia.

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese urged the terrorist sympathisers to abandon the rally. He also condemned them for supporting violence. More than 1,200 people have died in the Israel Hamas war sparked by the terrorist attacks launched by Hamas.

‘It’s excruciating when missiles strike our bunker, we’ve already lost 10 friends,’ 5 Nepalis stuck in war-torn Israel implore their govt to rescue them

The conflict between Israel and Palestine escalated to unforeseen levels on October 7 when Hamas, a Palestinian terrorist group that controls the densely populated Gaza Strip along Israel’s border, launched an unprecedented attack on Israel from the Gaza Strip. While hundreds of innocent civilians, defence personnel and foreign nationals have been killed and injured in the attack, several others have been left stranded in the war-torn areas.

Five such Nepali students in Israel who fell victim to the Hamas strike made a heartfelt appeal to the government of Nepal for aid and prompt rescue. In a video message they have posted on social media, the students, who have been hiding in a bunker for the past three days, describe the dangerous predicament they are in and implore their government to rescue them.

One of them who identifies himself as Bipin Subedi said that they travelled to Israel to attend the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences at Sudurpaschim University. In the video, which they seemed to have recorded from the insecure bunker they have been hiding in, Bipin Subedi admitted that during their three days in the bunker, they endured continuous missile attacks. He pleaded with the Government of Nepal to hasten their rescue since they feared for their life due to the constant threat of assault.

“I am Bipin Subedi, and we are students from Sudurpaschim University’s Faculty of Agricultural Sciences. There are five of us here. Initially, I hesitated to make this video because it would cause distress to our families. However, as our country has not taken any action to help us, we are compelled to make this video,” the petrified student said.

Subedi, elaborating on how helpless and panic-stricken he and his friends are at the moment, added, “There are five of us here, and this is the bunker where we are currently residing. We have been confined to this bunker for approximately three days. We have been here since yesterday evening, wearing the same clothes, hoping that the embassy would rescue us.”

Further, describing their panic when missiles start falling on their bunker at night, the Nepali student lamented how they had already lost 10 of their friends to the attack. He added that the fear of meeting a similar fate as their 10 friends keeps them awake throughout the night.

“When night falls, it’s excruciating when the missiles strike our bunker. We have already lost ten friends, and we are terrified that we may meet the same fate. We remember the cries of those ten friends, their desperate calls to us—everything. We haven’t slept a wink all night.”

The Nepali student lambasted the Nepalese administration, saying it showed little concern for its people who were trapped in the war-torn country. He claimed that it appeared as though the Nepali leadership was taking things easy because they believed that they could withstand missile attacks in the bunker.

The student went on to criticize the Nepalese government by juxtaposing its apathy toward its citizens who were trapped in Israel with the Indian government’s rapid action in ensuring the safe evacuation of its citizens from the war-torn nation.

He added, “If terrorists find their way here and attack us as ruthlessly as they did our friends, we will meet the same fate. Please, we cannot wait any longer. We have heard in the news that India chartered an entire plane to bring back a TikTok star. Our Nepalese government informed us that we couldn’t do anything in the agricultural sector, yet we have lost ten out of thirty-nine students.

In a desperate cry for help, the student promised to serve the country once he and his friends were safely evacuated and taken back to Nepal. Yearning to be rescued at the earliest from the perilous situation in Israel, Subedi said that they don’t need false assurance but want the Nepal government to act promptly. “The time for the state to act decisively is now. Please consider this,” he bemoaned as he ended the video message.

10 Nepali students killed in Hamas attack in Israel

Meanwhile, on Sunday, October 8, the media quoted an official of the Nepal Embassy as confirming that at least 10 Nepali students had been killed in Saturday’s Hamas invasion of Israel.

“Around 10 Nepali students died in the ongoing situation in Israel,” news agency ANI quoted a Nepal Embassy in Israel official as saying.

Nepal govt decides to keep plane on stand-by to bring bodies of Nepali killed in Israel

Furthermore, it was also reported that the government in Nepal has decided to keep a plane in a ready position and establish coordination with the Israeli side to repatriate home the bodies of Nepali nationals killed in the ongoing conflict in Israel. Additionally, in the meeting that was held on Sunday, October 8, the committee headed by Minister for Foreign Affairs NP Saud, also decided to find a way to relocate the Nepali citizens in Israel to safe areas.

‘Stand with Justice and fairness’: China refuses to explicitly condemn Hamas terrorist attack on Israel as it uses a diplomatic phrase

On 9th October (Monday), the Chinese Foreign Ministry announced that it wouldn’t condemn Palestine despite certain voices ‘pressurising’ it to do so following the Hamas terrorist attacks on Israel killing more than 700 Israeli citizens. Responding to queries over the Israel-Hamas war, the spokesperson of the Chinese Foreign Ministry declined to explicitly call out Hamas terrorists or Islamist outfits in Gaza for launching a surprise attack on Israeli citizens in the early hours of 7th October.   

Chinese FM spokesperson Mao Ning downplayed the terrorist attacks and ground invasion by Hamas inside Israeli territories and claimed that China condemns any “behaviour” that is “harmful” to civilians. Stating that it is “highly concerned” about the Israel-Hamas war, Mao Ning added that China opposes the escalation of the situation.

Chinese FM Spokesperson Mao added that the way out of conflict is to resume peace talks, implement the two-state solution, and push for a political solution to the Palestine question. He also said that China is willing to work with the international community to find adequate solutions.

Further, Mao warned Chinese nationals adding that they should refrain from traveling to Palestine and Israel for the time being. 

Regarding the reports that the US is sending weapons and warships to Israel, the Chinese FM said that China believes dialogues and negotiations are the fundamental way out of conflicts. It urged all parties to reach a ceasefire to avoid an escalation of the situation.

On the issue of whether China would condemn Palestine or not after the terror attacks, the Chinese FM spokesperson said China always stands with “justice and fairness”. He added that China is a friend of both Palestine and Israel and sincerely wishes the two sides can co-exist peacefully.

Notably, US Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer is on a visit to China, putting pressure on China to condemn the Hamas attacks on Israel. 

Chinese Foreign Ministry added, “China condemns all violence and attacks on civilians, we believe the most urgent task now is to reach a ceasefire and restore peace; we also hope the international community will jointly help calm down the tension.” 

It is important to note that despite the gory details of attacks, several countries have declined to unequivocally condemn terrorist acts giving it a larger geopolitical spin as it is believed that condemning Hamas could earn the ire of Islamic world. 

Meanwhile, the Israel-Hamas war has entered into its third day. Reports from Israeli local media suggest that around 700 people were killed across the country in the Hamas terror attack. The number continued to rise as more bodies were being recovered. Israel has officially declared war in the wake of the terror attacks. 

Startling details of the attack have come to the fore revealing that more than 260 civilians were killed in cold blood in one incident alone. 

Apparently, one of the first locations that the Hamas terrorists attacked was the Supernova music festival that was taking place close to the Gaza Strip. The survivors narrated the terrifying ordeal that included the rape of women, abduction, and merciless murders at the hands of Hamas terrorists. Reports say that over 260 dead bodies have already been recovered at the festival site. 

Blood, Islam, and oil: The Saud family’s history of bloody battles with Ottomans, desert warlords, and partnership with the USA to become a global power

On 9th September 2023, a groundbreaking agreement was unveiled during the G20 Summit in New Delhi with the announcement of a rail and shipping corridor from India to Europe via the Middle East. The project – ‘India-Middle East-Europe Shipping and Railway Connectivity Corridor’ (IMEE EC) is being hailed as the new spice route in the new world order. 

As part of the IMEE EC project, ‘moderate’ Saudi Arabia and ‘Jewish-majority’ Israel have come closer than ever to normalise their diplomatic ties. Reportedly, Saudi Arabia is engaged in negotiations with the United States to sign a defense pact in exchange for establishing diplomatic relations with Israel, a nation that was considered a pariah in the Islamic world. However, reports suggest that Saudi Arabia will not obstruct a deal even if Israel does not grant significant concessions to the Palestinians in their quest for statehood. Apparently, these changing geopolitical happenings are being attributed as one of the motives behind the recent terrorist attacks by Hamas on Israel

Although the Hamas-initiated attacks could derail or delay the deal, back-channel diplomacy continues to bridge gaps and bring the Saudi-US deal closer to finalisation. Against this backdrop, the Middle Eastern region is potentially at the cusp of marking an end to the dominance of Wahhabi ideology which was deeply rooted in a puritanical interpretation of Islam, in the Middle East and its spheres of influence.  

Remarkably, the Wahhabi ideology has exerted its dominance and molded the course of events across the Middle East for the better part of three centuries. It also played a pivotal role in the formation of the modern Middle East, notably Saudi Arabia as it stands today, and the consolidation of power by the Al Saud, the ruling monarchy of Saudi Arabia. The power dynamics in the region are an outcome of alliances both matrimonial (blood pact), religious pacts, and regional partnerships that were born out of inter-imperial battles between the Ottoman and British Empires.    

Emergence of Wahhabism in the Middle East

In the 18th century, Muhammad ibn Saud from the Al Saud (Al being referred to as family) was a Chieftan of a small oasis town of Diriyah on the outskirts of modern-day Riyadh. During his reign, an Islamic fundamentalist theologian, Sheikh Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab sought refuge in Diriyah as he was thrown out of Hejaz, the region that housed both the holy sites of Islam – Mecca and Medina. Wahhab’s extremist interpretation of Islam had irked the Hashmites who had been Sharifs of these holy sites for several centuries. These Sharifs who hailed from the Hashmites tribe of Hejaz owed allegiance to the Ottoman Empire. 

The Islamic Empire had limited or nominal direct interest in the affairs of the Middle Eastern region primarily because of the lack of resources in the Middle East in general, the Najd region in particular, and its unfavorable desert climate. However, it maintained a significant interest in the religious pilgrimage routes and at the holy sites of Islam.

Meanwhile, Chieftan Mohd ibn Saud not only gave refuge to Wahhab but also signed a pact with him in 1744 marking the beginning of the First Saudi state. Under the pact which is often dubbed as “Wahhabi-Saudi Pact”, Mohd ibn Saud remained as the Emir while Wahhab assumed the title of ‘Imam’. To strengthen the pact, Ibn Saud’s eldest son married al-Wahhab’s daughter. Al Saud publicly embraced Wahhabism. 

As a theologian, Wahhab also went on to lay the foundation of “Wahhabism” in the region. The aim of this pact was to bring purity to the faith and establish a puritanical form of Islam. Soon, Wahhabism became the official Saudi religious doctrine. Under this extreme form, religious innovation (bidaa) was vehemently rejected and it advocated for eliminating practices such as Sufi rites and veneration of saints. During their conquest outside Najd, they destroyed shrines of the Shia minority. The Wahabis used the slur ‘Rafida’ (rejecters) to refer to Shia, which still continues in the 21st century. 

On the other hand, the Emir of Diryiah Mohd ibn Saud started expanding control over various tribal regions in Najd (the central part of current-day Saudi Arabia) and parts of the Arabian Peninsula. He had gained religious certification from Imam Abdul Wahhab. Subsequently, brainwashed ‘Wahhabist’ tribes like Ikhwan joined his religious conquest of the Arabian Peninsula, under the Al Saud banner.

(Representational Divisional Map of erstwhile regions of Middle East, Al Saud emerged from Najd region, Hejaz houses both the holy sites of Islam, Mecca and Medina. Image Source – Facebook)

The Emir also formed alliances with tribal leaders and groups in Najd, including the Ajman and Otaiba tribes. These alliances were mostly based on a mix of military cooperation and shared religious ideals, particularly Wahhabi Islam.

However, the battle of consolidation included fierce battles against the rival Al Rashid (Rashidi family) and the Hashemite Sharif of Mecca, who had support from Egypt, the vassalage of the Ottoman Empire. In 1765, the Emir of Diriyah, Muhammad bin Saud passed away but by then the Wahhabis had controlled Najd and expanded in all directions, including Mecca and Medina. He was succeeded by his son Abdullah bin Muhammad bin Saud Al Saud as the new Emir of Diriyah.

Ottoman-Al Saudi War (1811-1818): The battle for real Islam

The period between 1811-1818 saw battles which are also known as the Egyptian-Wahhabi War as it was fought by the Egyptian representative of Ottoman and Wahhabists from Diriyah under the Al Saud banner. During the religiously zealous conquest, when the Egyptian subjects of Ottomans attempted to invade al-Hasa’ which lies in eastern Arabia, the Wahhabis seized the holy city of Karbala’ in Turkish Iraq (1801). It was followed by capturing Mecca itself in 1802. 

By the year 1805, the Wahhabis controlled Mecca and Medina. They had also attacked Karbala and the Imam Husayn Shrine which directly challenged the Ottoman Empire and their vassalage, Egyptians and Hashmite Sharifs of Mecca. 

Furthermore, under the leadership of Emir Abdullah bin Muhammad bin Saud, the Wahhabis targeted Ottoman trade routes, badly impacting the finances of the Ottoman Empire. The Emir of Diryiah also openly denounced and questioned the Ottoman Sultan Mustafa IV, challenging his legitimacy as the Caliph and protectorate of the faithful and holy sites in Hejaz.

Following that, in 1811, the Ottoman Sultan Mahmoud II ordered Muhammad Ali Pasha, who was considered the Wāli in Egypt, to check the expansionist spree of the Emir of Diryiah. Ali then assigned his son, Tusun Pasha, to lead a force of 10,000 soldiers. However, in 1812, the Emir of Diriyah, Abdullah defeated Tusun Pasha at Al-Safra. But with a reinforcement of 10,000 men, Pasha recaptured Mecca and Medina. 

On account of poor health, Tusun tried to forge a treaty with the Emir in which Hejaz was to be surrendered & vassalage offered. However, neither Ali nor the Sultan ratified the treaty with the House of Saud. In 1816 Tusun Pasha died and with mutual distrust abound, the war resumed with Ali’s other son, Ibrahim Pasha assumed leadership and led an expedition, driving the Saudi Emir and his “Wahhabis” (more properly Salafis) into the desert of Najd.

Subsequently, in 1818 Ibrahim marched across the desert and brought his forces to the gates of Diriyah. They ruthlessly massacred the male population of the rebel force. Diriyah was razed to the ground and all Wahhabi theologians found were executed. The captured Emir of Diriyah Abdullah bin Muhammad bin Saud was brought to Istanbul where he was publicly beheaded and his head was thrown into the Bosphorus. Additionally, the Wahhabis were compelled to listen to music, an act strictly prohibited in Wahhabism.

This marked the ending of the first Saudi state (1744-1818) which had begun with the Saudi-Wahhabi pact. 

Second Saudi State (1824-1891)

Two years after causing disruption in Najd, Ottoman forces withdrew from the region. Over the ensuing eighty years, the Al Saud made several attempts to regain control of the Arabian Peninsula, but their efforts failed courtesy of the Ottoman-Al Rashidi alliance

Son of Former Emir of Diriyah, Turki bin Abdullah bin Muhammad Al Saud and a few others had managed to escape the Ottoman carnage and soon after the Ottoman’s withdrawal, they started to regain their lost territories.  

By 1824, the Al-Saud family had regained political control of central Arabia. With Diryiah in ruins, the Saudi ruler Turki bin Abdullah Al-Saud transferred his capital to Riyadh which was some 20 miles south of Diriyah. With this, he established the Second Saudi State. In his 11 years of reign, Turki recaptured most of the lands lost to the Ottoman Empire. 

The Second Saudi State, under the leadership of Turki and his son Faisal, came to an end when the Al-Rashid family of Hail, with the backing of the Ottomans, successfully overthrew the Saudi State. This occurred during the Ottoman Empire’s renewed campaign in 1865 to expand its influence in the Middle East. Ottoman armies had captured parts of the Saudi State, which was ruled at the time by Faisal’s son, Abdulrahman. 

(Representational Map of the Middle East in the year 1880. Image Source – PBS.org)

After repeated defeats by a much larger and better-equipped army, Abdulrahman bin Faisal Al-Saud abandoned the struggle in 1891 marking the end of the Second Saudi state. 

During the exile, he sought refuge with the Bedouin tribes in the vast sand desert of eastern Arabia known as the Rub’ Al-Khali, or ‘Empty Quarter.’ From there, Abdulrahman and his family traveled to Kuwait, where they stayed until 1902. His young son Abdulaziz became the head of secular and military matters while he was in exile. Over the course of time, he launched raids and terrorised the tribes loyal to the Al Rashidis with an aim to regain Al Saud territories from Rashidis, the vassalage of Ottomans. 

Modern Saudi state (1902-present day Saudi Arabia)

On 15th January 1902, Abdulaziz, a direct descendent of Muhammad ibn Saud, accompanied by only 40 followers – mostly his blood relatives, half-brothers, cousins, and Kingsmen launched a daring night mission. They scaled the walls of Riyadh’s citadel to capture the city garrison, known as the Masmak Fortress. The Rashidi governor and his loyal man were slaughtered in cold blood. 

Reviving the emirate of Najd, with Abdulaziz as Emir and Abdul Rahman as Imam, this raid marked the beginning of the establishment of the third Saudi estate which continues to this present day and is known as the modern Saudi state.

Meanwhile, during World War 1 (1914-1919), the Al Saud aligned with the British Empire against their common foe, the Ottoman Turks, and their Arabian allies. He signed the Treaty of Darin with the British in 1915 which recognised his authority over much of Najd and established a formal alliance.

Around the same time, Britishers lured Hejaz into its own orbit and pulled it away from the Ottomans which later proved to be a great betrayal for the Hashimites. 

Evidently, during the ‘Arab Revolt’ (1916-1918), the Hejaz area (Mecca and Medina) broke free from the Ottomans. This was led by Shareef Hussein, the founder of the Hashemite dynasty and he declared himself king of the Arab countries as well as later, the new Caliph. However, in reality, he was only the king of Hejaz. Hussein was originally the Sharif of Mecca. In the present-day context, the descendants of Hashemite dynasties are now the monarchs of Jordan. 

Notably, the British and French had an agreement called the Sykes-Picot Agreement to divide some territories of the Middle East. Palestine, Jordan, and Iraq were actually controlled by the British. At the same time, Syria was controlled by the French. 

After capturing Riyadh, Al Saud wanted to expand further and consolidate the tribal areas once and for all. Apart from allying with Britishers, Abdulaziz also allied with the fierce nomadic warrior tribe of Bedouins, Ikhwan, or Muslim brothers. The Ikhwan had been brainwashed in Wahhabi ideology during the reign of Abdulaziz’s forefathers. 

(Image Source – X user jadaliyya)

Together they crushed all rebels including Ottoman’s effort to intervene. They captured Mecca in 1924 and Medina in 1925 which were ruled by Hashimites who had been pulled away from Ottomans by the British, yet British ally Al Saud ended 700 years of rule of Hashmities as Sharif of the Holy cities of Islam (barring a few years in between).   

Consequently, Abdulaziz became the ruler of the Two Holy Cities of Islam. However, afterward, Al Saud crushed Ikhwan in 1929, their Muslim warriors as they had an uncontrollable urge to spread Wahhabism beyond Arabia despite Abd al-Aziz imposing restrictions on them. The Ikhwan had started considering them corrupt due to their enormous wealth and Western allies. 

After conquering Hejaz in 1925, Al Saud officially incorporated the title ‘King of Najd and Hejaz’. In 1932, the two merged together to give birth to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia – named after Abdulaziz’s family (Al Saud).

Matrimonial alliances and pact with the US

In order to forge unity in his newly established kingdom, Abd al-Aziz entered into marital alliances by marrying daughters from every powerful tribe in the region and influential clerical families, he had around twenty wives, however, not more than four wives at a time, in accordance with Quranic principles. 

With these unions, he had 45 legitimate sons and an undisclosed number of daughters (with daughters typically not being counted). His half-brothers and cousins assisted him in conquering the peninsula. However, he started consolidating power in favor of his own sons. Since then, every Saudi king has been a son of Abd al-Aziz ibn Saud with Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman aka MBS is his only grandson who has risen to power. 

Despite having an alliance with the British, Saudi Arabia was wary of its imperial ambitions, and moving forward it found an ally in the United States. Consequently, Saudi Arabia and the U.S. established diplomatic relations. 

Subsequently, in 1933, the initial foreign oil explorers made their way to the kingdom. The Americans, in a significant transaction, paid $170,000 in gold for land concessions that, as it turned out, held the world’s largest oil reserves. Despite facing criticism that the invitation of foreigners into the kingdom contradicted Islamic principles and citing precedent from the Quran, King Abd al-Aziz extended an invitation to U.S. oil companies to help develop Saudi Arabia’s oil resources. 

Collaboratively, the oil companies and the Saudi government established a joint venture, which later evolved into the Arabian American Oil Company (Aramco), with shareholders that included America’s four largest oil corporations.

While the kingdom maintained a stance of neutrality during World War II, it leaned towards the Allies. Towards the war’s conclusion, King Abd al-Aziz held meetings with both UK Prime Minister Winston Churchill and US President Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR). In 1945, despite health concerns for both leaders, King Abd al-Aziz and FDR met for three days aboard the U.S.S. Quincy, which was docked in the Suez Canal. 

(The 1945 meeting between US President Franklin D Roosevelt and Saudi King Abdulaziz al Saud, marking the beginning of US-Saudi cooperation on defence and oil, changing the course of history. Image Credit – FDR Presidential Library & Museum/Flickr.)

The Quincy Agreement laid the groundwork for Saudi-American cooperation in matters related to oil and defense. Additionally, the two leaders solidified a confidential pact: King Abd al-Aziz pledged to grant the US secure access to Saudi oil, while in return, the US committed to providing military assistance, training, and the construction of the Dhahran military base in Saudi Arabia.

Since then, barring a few instances of power struggles within the Royal family, the House of Saud has been a stable power in the Middle East and the country leading the oil powers in the region. 

Did you know? Israel disengaged from Gaza and evicted all Jews in 2005 to attain peace, but Hamas turned the strip into a terror factory in response

In the early hours of October 7 (Saturday) morning, while the rest of the world was still sleeping and Israel was celebrating Simchat Torah, the day when Jews finish the yearly cycle of reading the Torah scroll, Palestine’s Islamist terrorist outfit Hamas struck Israel in multiple locations and by a number of different means, completely taking it by surprise.

The Hamas terrorists infiltrated the Israeli territory from the Gaza Strip. Additionally, Palestinian terrorists also launched massive rocket barrages at southern and central Israel from the Gaza Strip prompting it to declare a ‘state of war’. 

In the dastardly attack, which was completely unprovoked, hundreds of innocent Israeli civilians and defence personnel have been brutally massacred while several have been left severely injured. Umpteen have been taken hostage by the Hamas terrorists and driven off back into the Gaza Strip.

Social media is replete with videos of Hamas terrorists parading what appeared to be stolen Israeli military vehicles, including a tank, through the streets and at least one dead Israeli soldier within Gaza being dragged and trampled by an angry crowd of Palestinians. In some videos doing rounds on the internet, uniformed Hamas terrorists are seen capturing and torturing Israeli citizens and defence personnel while in others the terrorists in vehicles are seen parading naked bodies of Israeli citizens on the streets while shouting provocative slogans.

As Israeli forces continue to counterattack and battle to retake regions that the Hamas terrorists have taken over and the situation in the war-torn nation remains serious, here is an interesting piece of trivia about the Gaza Strip from where the Hamas terrorists launched the recent attacks against Israel.

Did you know that the Gaza Strip, which Palestine’s Islamist terrorist group Hamas has turned into a centre of terrorism, was once under Israeli control? Ariel Sharon, the Israeli prime minister at the time, made the decision to unilaterally withdraw from the region and give it to the Palestinians as a gesture of peace. But rather than promoting peace, Hamas transformed it into a hub for terrorism.

Gaza Strip is a 41km-long and 6-12 km-wide territory between Israel, Egypt, and the Mediterranean Sea. It has one of the highest population densities in the world with a population of about 2.3 million people. In the current scenario, Israel exercises control over the airspace above Gaza and its coastline, regulating the entry and exit of people and goods through its border crossings. Likewise, Egypt governs the passage of individuals into and out of Gaza through its border. However, things were different earlier.

Israel had full control over the Gaza Strip and the West Bank since it won the territory during the 1967 Arab-Israeli War, also known as the Six-Day War. However, in 2005, as a gesture of peace, Israel withdrew from the territory, gifting it to the Palestinians.

In the year 2005, a disengagement plan was put forward by then-Prime Minister Ariel Sharon. The purpose of the plan was to improve Israel’s security and international status in the absence of peace negotiations with the Palestinians. Sharon hoped that the plan would reduce friction with the growing Palestinian population in the Strip.

PM Ariel Sharon discussing plans for temporary housing of settlers being ‘evacuated’ from the Gaza Strip (Source: The News Arab)

To secure peace for the Palestinians, the Israel Defense Forces evicted Israeli citizens, demolished Israeli-owned buildings and evacuated security personnel. Thousands of Jewish settlers from dozens of settlements in the Gaza Strip were relocated. According to figures available on the internet, approximately 8,500 civilians from 21 settlements in the Gaza Strip, and 500 more from four small settlements in the northern part of the West Bank – about 2% of the total number of Israeli settlers in the Palestinian territories were evicted.

By September 12, 2005, the last Jew had left the Gaza Strip and the eviction of the four settlements in Samaria was completed.

Jews evacuating the homeland Gaza

Immediately following Israel’s withdrawal, Palestinian crowds entered the settlements waving Hamas flags, firing gunshots into the air, ransacking homes, desecrating, looting and destroying a few remaining synagogues.

Palestinian Authority security forces refused to intervene. The remaining settlements’ greenhouses, which would have been vital in agricultural developments, were looted. Banners proclaimed: “Four years of resistance beat ten years of negotiations.”

Palestinian authorities fired their first round of rockets at Israel on September 23, 2005. In 2007, the rocket attacks persisted. When bombs were dropped on its citizens, Israel reacted as any other country would and launched defensive airstrikes.

In June 2007 Hamas took over the Gaza Strip from the Palestinian Authority. Since the takeover, the Hamas terrorists also carried out several unprecedented and unprovoked attacks on innocent Israelis by land, sea, and air. Thousands of rockets and mortar shells have been fired from the Gaza Strip onto southern Israeli towns and villages, terrorizing and destabilizing the lives of hundreds of thousands of Israeli citizens.

In 2005, Israel took a bold step to evacuate its own people to secure peace with the Palestinians. Several anti-disengagement protesters, mainly jews, took to the streets to protest against the Israeli government’s plan to withdraw from the Gaza Strip and part of the West Bank, however, for the sake of peace, the Israeli government went ahead with its plan to pullout from the territory and gift it to the Palestines. But sadly, the Palestine-backed Islamist terrorists have since then converted the entire Gaza Strip into a hub of terrorism.

How Gaza is used as a terror launch pad against Israel

Although the most recent attack on Israel is thought to be the worst by Hamas in the past 50 years, the Islamist terrorists have been using the Gaza Strip, which Israel gave them as a gift as a gesture of peace, to launch thousands of rocket and mortar attacks on Israel. After the takeover, the region was reduced to a terrorist hub that the Palestinian terrorists have been utilizing as a launching pad for attacks against Israel. There has been a lingering fear of the next war left behind from each Hamas attack in 2008–2009, 2012, 2014, and 2021.

One of the most infamous incidents occurred in 2006 when they kidnapped Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit. In exchange for Shalit’s release, Israel released more than a thousand Palestinian prisoners, including Sinwar.

In 2008, the Palestianian Islamist terrorists launched an unprovoked attack on Israel from the Gaza Strip. The Gaza War, also known as Operation Cast Lead was a three-week armed conflict between Gaza Strip Palestinian paramilitary groups and the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) that began on 27 December 2008 and ended on 18 January 2009 with a unilateral ceasefire. In 2008, a total of 3,107 rockets and mortars were fired at Israel.

Similarly in 2014, Hamas kidnapped and killed three Israeli teenagers, prompting the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) to initiate Operation Brother’s Keeper, in which some 350 Palestinians, including nearly all of the active Hamas terrorists in the West Bank, were arrested. Hamas subsequently fired a greater number of rockets into Israel from the Gaza Strip, triggering a seven-week-long conflict between the two sides. It was one of the deadliest outbreaks of open conflict between Israel and the Palestinians in decades. The combination of Palestinian rocket attacks and Israeli airstrikes resulted in thousands of casualties.

The same year on March 5, the Israeli Navy intercepted a ship containing dozens of long-range rockets being smuggled from Iran to the Gaza Strip. On 10 March, Hamas, the Palestinian Islamist terrorists unveiled a monument to its rocket attacks on Israeli cities and towns, a life-sized model of an M-75 rocket in Gaza City. On 8 July, Operation Protective Edge commenced in response to rocket fire from the Gaza Strip, ending on 26 August. In this time period, between 2500 and 3000 rockets were launched.

Again, hundreds of rockets were fired at Israel during the Gaza-Israel clashes of November 2018.

Similarly, on the evening between 23 and 24 April 2021 36 rockets were fired towards Israel from Gaza, six of which were intercepted by the Israel Defense Forces’ Iron Dome defense system. Although there were no injuries, property was damaged in several communities in Israel. The Israeli military responded with military strikes in Gaza. On 10 May 2021 Hamas took credit for firing 7 rockets at Jerusalem and Beit Shemesh from Gaza, in what Hamas said was a response to injuries of over 300 Arabs in clashes with Israeli police outside al Aqsa mosque.

Last year, an estimated 1,100 rockets were launched from Gaza by the Palestinian Islamist terrorists. At least 200 malfunctioned and exploded within the Gaza Strip, and the Iron Dome intercepted 380.

In may this year, the IDF reported that 1,468 rockets were launched into Israel during Operation Shield and Arrow; 291 fell in Gaza; and 437 were intercepted by Iron Dome. Two rockets aimed at Tel Aviv were shot down by David’s Sling, and most of the rest landed in open areas without causing damage. One Israeli was killed when a rocket hit an apartment in Rehovot. A Palestinian laborer from Gaza working in Israel also died in a rocket strike.

Hamas carries out recurrent terror attacks on Israel

Hamas has been firing a spree of rockets and mortars into Israel after it took over Gaza. Iranian security officials admitted that Tehran provided some of these weapons. However, after getting training from Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and proxies, Hamas has been building its own missiles as well. 

Additionally, Hamas has been dropping hundreds of balloons laden with inflammatory substances and explosives, along with rockets on Israeli territories causing indiscriminate death and destruction to civilians. Israel has responded fiercely and unsparingly against the continued provocation, with persistent airstrikes and tank fires on locations described by it as Gaza’s military infrastructure installations.

Hamas terrorist attack in Israel: Kerala nurse injured while she was on video call with her husband in India, condition stable

0

A Kerala nurse was injured in the terrorist attack by Hamas in Israel while she was on a video call with her husband. Sheeja Anand, 41, was reportedly injured when Hamas launched a surprise terrorist attack on Israel on Saturday (7th October).

Sheeja was on a call with her family back in India to inform them that she was safe when a missile launched by Hamas hit her. Her family called her back immediately but could not get through.

Sheeja has sustained injuries on her hands, legs, and stomach. Her relatives reportedly said that she had undergone an emergency surgery and was undergoing treatment at a hospital in Tel Aviv.

Sheeja is a native of Valakkai in Sreekandapuram in Kannur district of Kerala while her husband works in Pune.

Sheeja has been working as a caretaker nurse in Ashkelon for the past seven years. The members of the family with whom Sheeja works also sustained injuries in the attack.

Her mother reportedly said, “I saw her on video call for a few seconds. She just mumbled Amma. Now we are told that she had a spinal injury as well. We are worried.”

A report by Onmanorama has said that Sheeja has spoken to her mother Sarojini and sister Shiji in Kannur from the hospital. Meanwhile, she is reportedly stable.

Over 200 people from Kerala are reportedly stranded in a hotel in Bethlehem and are safe. The group has been asked to stay back at the hotel. They were reportedly scheduled to leave for Egypt on Monday (9th October).

Moreover, another 45 people from Kochi are stranded in a hotel in Palestine. The group is safe and has reportedly received permission to cross the border.

Pakistani ICC World Cup presenter Zainab Abbas leaves India after her hateful, Hinduphobic, anti-India tweets trigger cybercrime complaint

On 9th October, Pakistani ICC World Cup presenter Zainab Abbas exited from India. As per Samaa TV, she “exited India over safety concerns”. The media house added that she went to Dubai after leaving India. Her old tweets surfaced when she announced that she would be a presenter at the Cricket World Cup 2023 that India is hosting.

On 2nd October, Abbas posted on X (formerly Twitter) that she was excited to be a presenter at the ICC World Cup. However, X user YearOfTheKraken objected to the selection and posted screenshots of her old anti-Hindu and anti-India posts. In one of these old tweets, she ranted, “This 120 crore population can’t produce one fast bowler. Eat some f*c*ing meat u shud shakaharis.”

She used the cow piss jibe in another tweet to target Indians, particularly Hindus. She wrote, “..true it does Man went Delhi, and it smells of cow piss. Oops, that’s their maa Kaali maa.” The posts were deleted, and she had changed her handle years ago, but as it is said, ‘once it is on the internet, it is there forever’ the posts came back to bite her before her stint at ICC Men’s Cricket World Cup 2023.

On 6th October, Supreme Court lawyer Vineet Jindal filed a complaint against her over her old posts. In his complaint dated 4th October, Jindal stated that Zainab Abbas had made anti-India and Hinduphobic statements. Taking to X, advocate Vineet Jindal informed about the complaint filed with the Cyber Cell of Delhi Police. He requested that an FIR be filed against Zainab Abbas under sections 153A, 295, 506, 121 IPC and sec 67 IT Act for disparaging remarks about Hinduism and anti-India statements. Moreover, the advocate demanded that the Pakistani presenter be removed from the list of presenters for the ongoing ICC Men’s World Cup.

Pakistani fans fumed at Zainab Abbas’s exit

The reports of Zainab leaving India led to outrage among Pakistani cricket fans, who then spewed venom against India. They accused India of being “intolerant”.

X user Shehryar said, “After looking at Zainab Abbas’ case, I’ve actually developed sympathy for Irfan Pathan…He does all this for him and his family’s safety…India is so intolerant, insecure and is highly influenced by hindutva terr*rist outfit i.e RSS.”

X user JahanZaib wrote, “The incident of deporting Zainab Abbas by India is very sad, now we are worried about our team, may Allah protect them.” It appears he knows what kind of anti-Hindu venom Pakistani cricketers spew regularly.

Sports journalist of Samaa TV Qadir Khawaja called India a “coward” for “deporting” Zainab. In a post in Urdu, he claimed Zainab was a “guest”, but she was deported after a lawyer filed a complaint against her.

X user Rubab said, “Zainab Abbas has departed from India. (Samaa TV). Shame On you India. You can’t Deserve to Host Worldcup. India has to be worst host in worldcup history. Pathetic from neighbors.”

It is notable here that Zainab was not “deported”. She went back on her own accord, possibly after her old tweets triggered police complaints against her. Samaa TV corrected its earlier post that said she was ‘deported’, and later shared another post saying she has ‘safely exited India’ over safety concerns.

As Hamas desecrates Shani Louk’s naked body, old tweet of Leicester violence provocateur Mohammed Hijab viral, had called for enslavement of Non-Muslims

Two days after Hamas terrorists stripped and paraded the dead body of German national Shani Louk, an old tweet of a radical Islamic preacher named Mohammed Hijab went viral on social media on Monday (9th October).

The tweet, shared by Youtuber David Wood on the micro-blogging platform, showed Mohammed Hijab calling for the enslavement of non-Muslims. The Islamist preacher suggested that non-Muslim women somehow loved to be taken as ‘sex slaves’ by the Islamic captors.

“I believe certain anti-muslim women would wish they lived in the medieval period. A period where if a war was won by the opposing side it was conventional that people could be taken as booty. Some historical accounts actually say some women would dress up for the captor,” his tweet read.

While reacting to the disturbing tweet by Mohammed Hijab, David Wood emphasised, “When you read about Hamas jihadis raping their Jewish captives, remember that their da’ees, such as Mohammed Hijab, teach them that women and girls WANT to be captured and raped.”

The tweet by Mohammed Hijab, calling for the enslavement of Muslim women, was posted around July 2022. There is a video of Mikhaila Peterson (the daughter of renowned Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson) and Ridvan Aydemir (who runs the channel ‘The Apostate Prophet) on Youtube, reacting strongly to the tweet by the Islamic preacher on July 29, 2022.

The controversial tweet by Mohammed Hijab went viral at a time when Hamas terrorists were leaving no stone unturned to desecrate the bodies of female Israelis.

Among one such disturbing visual was the naked and battered dead body of German tourist named Shani Louk, paraded by the Hamas terrorists in a pickup truck. 

One of the first locations that the Hamas terrorists attacked was the Supernova Music Festival, located close to the Gaza Strip. Reportedly, the terrorists raped the women irrespective of their nationality.

Some of the victims of the attack were either executed or taken to Gaza, which has been confirmed by the videos and photos available on social media. Tablet Magazine reported some survivor accounts, mentioning that women were raped at the festival site itself near the dead bodies of their friends. Several rape victims were then executed by the Hamas terrorists.

Similar fate of ISIS sex slaves

Earlier in March 2023, a former Yazidi sex slave (identified as Dila), who lived under ISIS captivity, revealed that she was kidnapped at 13. She was then sold as a slave in the Iraqi city of Mosul before being abducted and taken to Syria’s Raqqa.

The victim was then raped, and abused by ISIS terrorists for over 7 years.The terror outfit has so far killed over 5,000 Yazidis, whom they consider ‘devil worshippers’.

More than 10,000 Yazidis were kidnapped and over 5 lakh people were forced to leave their homes. Women and children were sold, raped, and forcibly converted to Islam. While Dila was able to escape, about 2,700 Yazidi children and women are still believed to be in captivity by ISIS.

Quranic verses calling for sex slavery

Certain verses of the Quran appear to justify sex slavery by Islamic captors. For instance, Chapter 33 (Al-Ahzab) Verse 50 of the Quran states

O Prophet! We have made lawful for you your wives to whom you have paid their ˹full˺ dowries as well as those ˹bondwomen˺ in your possession, whom Allah has granted you.1 And ˹you are allowed to marry˺ the daughters of your paternal uncles and aunts, and the daughters of your maternal uncles and aunts, who have emigrated like you. Also ˹allowed for marriage is˺ a believing woman who offers herself to the Prophet ˹without dowry˺ if he is interested in marrying her—˹this is˺ exclusively for you, not for the rest of the believers.2 We know well what ˹rulings˺ We have ordained for the believers in relation to their wives and those ˹bondwomen˺ in their possession. As such, there would be no blame on you. And Allah is All-Forgiving, Most Merciful

Chapter 4 (An-Nisa) of the Quran states

Also ˹forbidden are˺ married women—except ˹female˺ captives in your possession.1 This is Allah’s commandment to you. Lawful to you are all beyond these—as long as you seek them with your wealth in a legal marriage, not in fornication. Give those you have consummated marriage with their due dowries. It is permissible to be mutually gracious regarding the set dowry. Surely Allah is All-Knowing, All-Wise.

Chapter 23 (Al-Mu’minum) Verses 5-6 of the Quran states

Successful indeed are the believers: those who guard their chastity (private parts) except with their wives or those ˹bondwomen˺ in their possession,1 for then they are free from blame.

A similar diktat appears in Chapter 70 (Al- Ma’arij) Verses 29-30 of the Quran.

Leicester violence: Mohammed Hijab incited Muslims to attack Hindus

On September 19 last year, Islamist scholar Mohammed Hijab was seen mocking Hinduism and inciting Muslims to attack the Hindus. In a video that surfaced on social media, he was seen interacting with mask-clad Muslim men and encouraging them to teach the local Hindu population ‘a lesson’.

“When I was on social media, I saw these people (Hindus) getting brave. How come today it is like pin-drop silence?” the British Egyptian ‘scholar’ was heard as saying. He claimed that no Hindus were in sight after realising that Muslim mobs were coming at them in hordes.

“Cause they (Hindus) fear us when they are near us”, responded an Islamist from the crowd. Pumped by the support of the like-minded people in the crowd, Hijab said, “Deep down, they know we got the truth. If you want respect, then, learn to respect.”

“If they (Hindus) believe in reincarnation, what a humiliation of them to be reincarnated into some pathetic, weak, cowardly people like that,” the Islamist went on an anti-Hindu tirade.

“Hindutva (Hindus), you are trying to act like gangsters…Don’t ever come out like that again (referring to the protests by Hindus in Leicester). Do you understand? Are they going to come out again?” he continued his threats.

Amidst the war cry of Allah hu Akbar, Mohammed Hijab cautioned that he and his supporters would be there if Hindus ‘dared’ to protest against the violence, committed by his co-religionists.

In an Instagram post dated September 18, 2022, Hijab was seen leading a frenzied mob of Islamists, with their faces covered in masks. “Muslim patrol in Leicester,” he wrote in his post.

Mohammed Hijab also worked alongside hate preacher and fugitive, Zakir Naik, during the fundraising for the construction of a grand mosque and Dawah (proselytism) centre in Oslo, Norway.