Home Blog Page 3907

Terrorism, Pakistan, COVID, Afghanistan and more: Here’s all that PM Modi and US VP Kamala Harris discussed in the bilateral meet

Prime Minister Narendra Modi had the first bilateral talk with US Vice President Kamala Harris on September 23, the first day of his three-day tour. PM Modi took to social media to share glimpses from the meeting. 

“Glad to have met @VP @KamalaHarris. Her feat has inspired the entire world. We talked about multiple subjects that will further cement the India-USA friendship, which is based on shared values and cultural linkages,” he Tweeted.

VP Harris called out Pakistan for its support to terrorism

Foreign Secretary Harsh Shringla while addressing a press meet informed about the discussion between the two leaders on terrorism, the role of Pakistan and the need to keep a close watch on India’s notorious neighbour.

Shringla said, “On terrorism, US VP Kamala Harris ‘suo moto’ referred to Pakistan’s role in that regard. She said that there were terror groups working there. She asked Pakistan to take action so that these groups don’t impact US security & of India.”

The US Vice President also agreed with PM Modi on how India has been a victim of cross-border terrorism for several years now. 

Harris also stressed at the need to reign in and monitor Pakistan’s support to terrorism. 

‘Need to defend democracy’

The Vice President of the US in a joint statement with PM Modi acknowledged the threat to democracies and the need to defend the institutions.

“As democracies around the world are under threat, it is imperative that we defend democratic principles and institutions within our respective countries and around the world and that we maintain what we must do to strengthen democracies at home,” said the US VP.

Afghanistan and COVID situation discussed between VP Kamala Harris and PM Modi

Both the leaders in this first bilateral discussion also exchanged views on recent global developments, including Afghanistan which is now under the rule of the Taliban.

The two countries reaffirmed their commitment towards a free, open and inclusive Indo-Pacific region.

PM Modi and VP Harris also discussed the Covid-19 situation in their respective countries including ongoing efforts to contain the pandemic by encouraging vaccination drives and attempts being made to ensure continuous supply of critical medicines, therapeutics and healthcare equipment.

Harris lauded India’s efforts amidst pandemic

The US VP acknowledged India’s dominant global role in fighting the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic. In the joint statement, Harris said, “Early in the pandemic, India was a vital source of vaccines for other countries.”

Lauding India’s vaccination drive, the US VP said, “It is worth noting that India is currently vaccinating approximately 10 million people a day as of today.”

She also welcomed the Government of India’s announcement of resuming exports of Covid-19 vaccines soon.  

Possible collaboration in technology and healthcare

The two also discussed possible collaboration in space cooperation, information technology, emerging and critical technologies, and cooperation in the healthcare sectors. 

As per Foreign Secretary Harsh Vardhan Shringla, the two leaders also acknowledged people-to-people ties between the two countries. They also elaborated on the need to nurture the mutually beneficial education linkages, the flow of knowledge, innovation, talent exchange between the two countries. 

Shringla further informed that the discussion between the two leaders was ‘substantive and lasted over an hour.’

Full text of the press release by India (MEA) detailing the meeting between PM Modi and USA Vice President Kamala Harris

Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi met Her Excellency Kamala Harris, Vice President of the United States of America, in Washington DC on 23 September 2021, during his visit to the USA. 

2. They expressed happiness at their first in-person meeting. They warmly recalled their telephone conversation earlier in June 2021. They exchanged views on recent global developments, including in Afghanistan and reaffirmed their commitment towards a free, open and inclusive Indo-Pacific region. 

3. The two leaders discussed the COVID-19 situation in their respective countries, including ongoing efforts to contain the pandemic through expedited vaccination efforts, and ensuring supply of critical medicines, therapeutics and healthcare equipment. 

4. Both sides acknowledged the importance of collaborative action on climate change. Prime Minister spoke about India’s push for increasing renewable energy and the recently launched National Hydrogen Mission. He also emphasized the importance of lifestyle changes to promote environmental sustainability. 

5. They also discussed areas of future collaboration, including space cooperation, Information Technology, especially emerging and critical technologies, as well as the cooperation in healthcare sector. Both leaders acknowledged the vibrant people-to-people linkages as the bedrock of the mutually beneficial education linkages and the flow of knowledge, innovation and talent between our two countries. 

Prime Minister Modi invited Vice-President Kamala Harris and Second Gentleman Douglas Emhoff to visit India soon. 

Aaditya Thackeray, the penguins at Mumbai zoo and the controversy surrounding them: Here is all you need to know

Donald, Daisy, Popeye, Olive, Flipper, Bubble and Mr Molt are again in the news. But who are they? They are penguins owned by Mumbai Zoo, thanks to the Cabinet Minister of Tourism and Environment for the Government of Maharashtra, Aaditya Thackeray. The Veer Mata Jijabai Bhosale Udyan Mumbai, or the Mumbai Zoo, is the only place in the country where you can witness seven penguins having fun in their man-made habitat. These penguins, however, have been mired in controversy ever since, including Aaditya Thackeray, who is now being questioned about the move.

All of them are Humboldt penguins that were bought from Seoul, South Korea, in July 2016. The species of the penguins have been named after the explorer Alexander von Humboldt from Chile, which is the original habitat of these flightless birds. At that time, Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) had bought eight penguins (three male and five female) for Rs. 2.5 crores.

The new controversy

Recently, the Mumbai Zoo has issued a tender worth Rs. 15.15 crores to recreate their natural habitat in an enclosure. As per reports, the new habitat would spread over 35,000 square feet of area and will be two-storey. To ensure the health and well-being of the birds, the temperature of the whole enclosure should be maintained between 16 degrees Celsius to 18 degrees Celsius. The water temperature in the pond would remain between 11 degrees Celsius and 16 degrees Celsius. Such conditions require huge costs and have attracted yet another controversy revolving around the birds.

Interestingly, it is not only BJP or opposition parties that have opposed the project. Shiv Sena’s ally Congress as well has targeted BMC over the tender worth Rs. 15 crores+. They have termed the project a waste of money. Critics are questioning the BMC why the whole project is being outsourced rather than setting up a mechanism to take care of the birds.

BJP leader Prabhakar Shinde also raised the question over the increased amount of the tender. He said, “The earlier contract was awarded for Rs 10 crore. The BMC needs to justify the inflated cost.” OpIndia tried reaching out to Shinde but could not connect.

Ravi Raja, Congress, said, “The penguins have been here for more than five years now. The BMC should have built an in-house facility to take care of them. They need to spend more money on rebuilding the health infrastructure in the city.”

BMC justified the tender cost

BMC, on the other hand, have tried to justify the cost. They said that it would include the cost of veterinary charges, fodder cost, air conditioning and ventilation system, exhibit maintenance and quarantine area. It further added that the new enclosure is essential to ensure the bird lives. Otherwise, according to BMC, their lives would be at risk.

The death of penguins

One of the penguins, Dory, that were bought initially died due to a bacterial infection and faulty climatic conditions within two months of arrival to India. At that time, Thackeray was heavily criticized for bringing such expensive birds “only to die”.

Earlier in 2018, Highway Constructions, the company that is currently maintaining the enclosure, was fined Rs. 1.4 crores as the company falsely claimed that they have a joint venture with a company that has expertise in developing a support system for aquatic life. The three-year contract is ending with the company soon.

Another round of criticism came in the way of BMC when a newly-born Humboldt penguin died within seven days of its birth. It was the first penguin to be born in India. According to the official statement, it died due to birth anomalies.

Experts believe that Dory died due to a sudden change in the environment, and no one was trained to handle the exotic birds. Many have said it was a bad decision to bring the birds to be hot and humid in India.

The good news

Amidst all the controversies, two penguin chicks, named Oreo and Flipper, were born in the zoo. Oreo was born in May, while Flipper was born in August this year. Four-months old Oreo is living happily with the colony. On the other hand, Flipper is still under strict observation. 

The controversy around ‘Baby Penguin’

For the controversies penguins have caused in the past few years, many have started calling Aaditya Thackeray “Baby Penguin”. The hashtag makes its way to social media platforms every now and then. Last year, a man named Sameet Thakkar was arrested over a complaint filed against him for calling Aaditya Baby Penguin on social media. The controversy went on for months, and he was released from jail in November.

’30,000 acres of land, ancient temple encroached, 10,000 people attacked police’: Assam govt orders judicial enquiry after eviction drive turns violent

An eviction drive conducted by the administration in Darrang district in Assam turned violent after the illegal encroachers of the land attacked the security forces. While 9 policemen were injured in the attack by the mob of illegal encroachers, 2 attackers were killed in retaliatory police firing.

The incident took place at the Dholpur in the Garukhuti area near the Sipajhar town in Darrang district in Assam, where the Himanta Biswa Sarma government is conducting an eviction drive of illegal settlers on land belonging to the government or other organisations like temples. When the eviction party reached the place inhabited Bengali speaking Muslims on Thursday, thousands of people clashed with the police, attacking them with stones, machetes, pointed bamboo sticks etc.

As the mob could not be dispersed even by using tear gas shells, and several policemen were injured in the attack, the police opened fire on the attackers. According to SP Sushanta Biswa Sarma, the condition of one policeman is critical.

Today’s eviction drive was conducted at Dholpur Bazar area, West Chuba, Dholpur no 1 and Dholpur 3 under the Sipajhar revenue circle. While the drive was going on smoothly in the morning, the drive faced strong protests in Dholpur No 1 and Dholpur 3, and cops were attacked there.

According to the administration, the people living in the area were served notices to vacate the encroached land well in advance, and when they didn’t comply with the notices, the eviction drive was conducted.

Sources in the Assam government said that Dholpur is an area with 25000 acres of land along with a 5,000 years old Shiva temple and a cave. This area is facing encroachment and gradually more people are coming and settling there. . According to the govt, around 30,000 acres of land have been encroached upon by Bangladeshi immigrants. As a result, indigenous people are completely devastated. This has also led to an increase in incidents of robbery and dacoity in the area, and the locals blame the encroachers for the same.

Given this situation, the state govt has taken up the eviction initiative after discussions with local Muslims. They were promised alternate land as per land policy, and they had agreed to the same. The govt said that the eviction drive in the last two days was peaceful, but today 10,000 people attacked police and in retaliation police was forced to fire, causing the death of two people.

According to the govt sources, over 10,000 people who attacked police during the eviction drive were Muslim immigrants.

The state government has ordered a judicial enquiry into the entire incident. State Govt is in touch with all Muslim organisations so that situation remains normal, and the Muslim leaders have assured full cooperation from their side. At present, the situation is under control. Govt says that indigenous people in Assam are happy with the eviction drive.

A video from the eviction drive has been widely condemned on social media, where a man with a camera in hand, who appears to be a photojournalist, was seen jumping on the body of a man shot by security forces. The disturbing video shows a local man chasing the photographer with a machete in hand. The photographer runs towards the security forces to save his life, and the policemen shot at the man who was charging towards them. After the attacker drops to the ground, presumably dead, the photographer jumps on his body, before being taken away by the security forces.

This incident is also being probed by the police, and the cameraman has been arrested by the police.

Earlier on Monday, the administration had evicted around 800 families, clearing about 4500 bighas of encroached land in the same reigon.

Maharashtra: 29 men raped a 14-year old girl in Dombivli for 8 months, 26 arrested including 2 minors

The Maharastra police have arrested 26 persons and detained two minors in connection with the spine chilling Dombivli rape incident where a 14-year-old minor girl was sexually assaulted multiple times at different places in the Thane district of Maharashtra over the last eight months by over 30 men.

All the arrested accused have been booked under Indian Penal Code (IPC) Sections 376 (rape), 376 (N), 376 (3), 376 (D) (A) and Section 4,6 and 10 of the POCSO Act.

Datta Karale, the additional commissioner of police, informed that 24 accused have been arrested while two other minors have been detained. The police are on the lookout for the remaining three accused.

According to reports, the Kalyan sessions court has remanded the 24 accused to police custody till September 29. The two detained minors have been sent to Bhiwandi remand house. “It all started when the lover of the girl raped her in January and made a video of the incident. He started blackmailing her on the basis of that video. Later on, his friends and acquaintances gang-raped her at least on four to five occasions at different places, including Dombivili, Badlapur, Murbad and Rabale in the district,” he said.

A special investigation team (SIT) has been formed under ACP Sonali Dhole to probe the case, he added.

The case was filed after the victim, who is currently being treated in hospital, approached the police last night (Wednesday, September 22).

According to the report, the accused carried out the rape incident between January and September. The tragic tale began in the month of January when one of the girl’s friends raped her and filmed the crime. He blackmailed her and raped her again using the video. He allegedly distributed the film to a large number of people, including friends and acquaintances, who all started blackmailing the adolescent using the video.

According to the authorities, the girl was gang-raped by the group several times and at several locations near Mumbai in the pretext of leaking the objectionable video.

The heinous incident has left the entire country reeling under shock. Amidst growing public outrage, many political parties have demanded the toughest punishment for those who assaulted the teen.

Former Maharashtra chief minister and Opposition leader Devendra Fadnavis said the culprits must be severely punished. Government must take these incidents seriously and act expeditiously, Tweeted the BJP leader.

Maharashtra is lately emerging as the epicentre for crime against women. Many gruesome cases of rape and assault, like the recent Sakinaka rape case, have been reported from the state in the last few months. With the spate of gruesome and horrific rape cases in the state, questions are being raised on the misgovernance of the Shiv Sena led Maha Vikas Aghadi government in Maharashtra. People are enraged by the state’s lawlessness, which has emboldened criminals to perpetrate such heinous atrocities without fear of being caught by the authorities.

Dhanbad judge Uttam Anand was deliberately hit causing his death, CBI informs Jharkhand High Court

0

The CBI joint director Sharad Agrawal on Thursday informed the Jharkhand High Court that Additional District and Sessions Judge of Dhanbad, Uttam Anand, was deliberately hit by the auto-rickshaw leading to his death. However, the motive of the murder is not confirmed yet. The CBI further informed the court that the agency is investigating whether accused auto driver Lakhan Verma and his friend Rahul Verma were asked by somebody to hit the judge.

Analysing the recreated crime scene, CCTV footage, and forensic evidence suggested that the incident was not an accident and the judge was deliberately hit, the CBI has concluded. The agency said that it is probing to ascertain the motive behind the murder.

Sharad Agrawal, who was summoned by the court to explain the progress made in this case, further informed the Bench of Chief Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan and Justice Sujeet Narayan Prasad that the CBI is making all efforts to investigate the judge murder case.

On this, the High Court made an oral observation that the murder of the judicial officer has lowered the morale of judicial officers. The High court further observed that if this murder case is not solved soon it will not be good for the judicial system of the country as it was for the first time when a judge died in this way.

Notably, in the previous hearing, the court had expressed displeasure as the CBI was unable to make any progress. The court had summoned CBI joint director for a physical appearance and had slammed the CBI for furnishing stereotyped progress reports.

The court had expressed displeasure that the agency could not move an inch beyond two accused persons Lakhan Verma and Rahul Verma who are already in judicial custody. The court had questioned whether these accused had any motive to kill the judge.

The CBI also conducted narco tests upon them and further interrogated them in police custody. They accepted that they intentionally hit the judge on the morning of July 28 near Randhir Chowk in Dhanbad district when the judge was returning home after a morning walk.

But they tried to convince the CBI that they hit the judge to snatch valuable items from his possession believing he (judge) must be carrying a mobile phone and wallet.  Accused said that they fled away after they saw some bikers.

Investigation revealed that the accused had stolen an auto-rickshaw (JH 10R 0461) besides three mobile phones. 

Complaint filed against Alt News founder Pratik Sinha in Surat for insulting Hindu gods

A complaint has been filed against Alt News founder Pratik Sinha over a tweet he had posted in 2015, accusing him of disrespecting Hindu Gods and Goddesses. The complaint was filed at the Khatodara police station in Surat by social activist Vikash Ahir.

The complaint seeks filing of an FIR against Pratik Sinha under sections 153A (Promoting enmity between different groups), 295A (Deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings or any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs), 298 (Uttering any words with deliberate intent to wound the religious feelings), 504 (Intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of the peace) and 505 (creating or promoting enmity, hatred or ill will between classes) of the Indian Penal Code, along with relevant provisions of the Information Technology Act.

Informing about the complaint filed, the Twitter account of Vikash Ahir’s team said that Hindustan will not tolerate the insult of Lord Ganesha. The tweet also added hashtags demanding the arrest of Pratik Sinha.

The case relates to a tweet by Pratik Sinha posted on 19 September 2015, where he had allegedly insulted Hindu God Ganesha. ‘So many people posting pictures of Ganesha. You guys really believe a man had an elephants (sic) head?’, he had posted in the tweet.

The screenshots of the tweet had surfaced recently on the social media platform during the recently concluded Ganesh Chaturthi, causing outrage among Hindu social media users. They had said that the tweet was insulting towards Hindu gods, and action should be taken against the Alt News founder for hurting the religious freedom of Hindus.

Accordingly, social activist and Hindu Yuva Vahini’s Gujarat president Vikash Ahir has filed the complaint at the Khatodara police station in Surat, which was accepted by the police station on September 20. Vikash Ahir told OpIndia that police have accepted the complaint, registered a case, and have started proceedings in the case.

He informed that the police have summoned Pratik Sinha to the police station to file his response to the complaint. If he does not appear at the police station within the given time, a police team will be dispatched to arrest him to bring him to Surat.

‘What India has done, no other country has been able to do’: SC lauds Modi govt’s handling of COVID, decision to pay ex-gratia to kin of victims

The Supreme Court on Thursday appreciated the Narendra Modi government for taking steps to provide Rs 50,000 ex-gratia assistance to the nearest kin of those who lost their life due to COVID-19. The bench of Justices A S Bopanna and Justice M R Shah which is hearing petitions related to ex-gratia assistance to the family Covid-19 victims further applauded the Modi government for steps taken to tackle the pandemic.

The court took note of the fact that what India could do and have done for its citizen no other country has been able to do. The court further expressed happiness since the step will bring some solace to the persons who have suffered and it will also wipe the tears of many families. The court took note of the fact that despite so many problems of population and overpopulation, the government managed to tackle the pandemic in the manner that it did.

“What India has done, no other country has been able to do. We are happy that something has been done to wipe the tears of many families,” the Supreme Court noted.

The Supreme Court’s appreciation has once again exposed lies of the Lutyens media and Toolkits of the opposition aimed to defame the government and the country.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta who appeared for the Centre said that the loss of life can’t be repaired and compensated but even after the nation has done whatever it could do for the families who have suffered.

The Centre had informed the court that the National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) has recommended Rs. 50,000 per deceased person who died due to COVID-19. It also includes such persons who were part of the relief operations, associated with related activities and they died due to COVID-19. The Centre assured the court that the assistance is not limited to the first and second wave of the pandemic. It will continue in future phases of the pandemic.

The bench took on record two affidavits filed by the Centre and said that it will hold the next hearing on October 4 when the orders will be passed with suitable directions including empowering the grievance redressal committees at the district level to call for medical records of the deceased from the hospital, in case of any dispute over the issuance of a death certificate.

Notably, lawyer Gaurav Kumar Bansal besides others who lost their family members due to COVID-19 had filed petitions to demand ex-gratia assistance.

During the course of the hearing, there were some concerns that were addressed and resolved like what if the hospitals do not mention Covid-19 as the cause of death even if a person lost his life due to post COVID-19 complications.

On this Solicitor General, Tushar Mehta said that in such a situation kin of the deceased can approach the committee formed at the district level which will be constituted under guidelines of NDMA. The district-level committee will also look into the cases of issuance of death certificates.

The bench pointed out that some hospitals behave like a monarch. It refuses to hand over medical reports to the family members and sometimes even refuses to hand over the dead bodies.

The Solicitor General said that in such cases family members can approach the committee which can call for the hospital records.

Explaining modalities Solicitor General Mehta said the next of kin of the deceased may produce some evidence like an RT-PCR test report before committees to show that the patient concerned was affected by COVID-19 before his death. This can help to settle cases where the hospital does not mention COVID 19 as the cause of death.

On September 11 the NDMA had issued a detailed guideline on the directive given by the Supreme Court on June 30

ABP journalist calls news report by his own channel fake to attack PM CARES Fund and PM Modi: Here are the details

A war of words has erupted on Twitter between activist Ankur Singh and ABP journalist Abhinav Pandey after the latter called one of its own news channel’s report fake, in order to attack the central government’s PM CARES Fund. The controversy erupted after the ABP journalist took to the microblogging site to cast aspersions on PM Modi’s PM Cares Fund.

In response to the journalist’s tweet criticising the BJP government for establishing the PM Care Fund instead of the PM National Relief Fund, activist Ankur Singh used a series of tweets to educate the journalist. Ankur shared a snippet of a video uploaded by ABP news on its YouTube channel on May 27, 2020.

The controversy worsened after Abhinav Pandey, in order to castigate the Modi government and prove his skewed perception right, shamelessly went on to call his own news channels’ report fake.

The May 2020 ABP report, which summarised the difference between the PM Cares Funds and the PMNRF, clearly states that the President of the Congress party is still very much a member of the managing committee of the Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund (PMNRF), a fact that the ABP journalist was vehemently refuting in his Tweets.

OpIndia has also written a detailed report about the Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund, in which it is clearly mentioned that PMNRF has the PM, deputy PM, finance minister, Congress president and a representative of the Tata Trust and industry representative chosen by FICCI, as members of the trust whereas PM Cares have up to 13 eminent experts to undertake relief or assistance of any kind relating to a public health emergency including the creation and up-gradation of healthcare facilities. Most importantly, the eminent experts will be working pro bono.

Here, rather than gracefully accepting his mistake, Abhinav Pandey defended himself and blamed Ankur Singh for sharing a bogus video. According to Pandey, no fraudulent video can be passed off as genuine by affixing the news channel’s logo. The ABP news logo has changed, according to the journalist, and the sample of video shared by Ankur was not posted on his channel.

Then, before one could even realise, ABP News made the aforementioned video posted on its YouTube channel private. The archive version of the report by ABP News can, however, be viewed here.

ABP News makes the video posted by it on May 27, 2020 private

After the ABP News journalist deleted his Tweet which called the channel’s report fake, activist Ankur Singh, once again, hit out at Pandey and ABP News for not issuing an apology.

The ABP News journalist, like many other Congress loyalists and trolls, had taken to Twitter to peddle the same lie surrounding the PM Care Fund and questioning the decision to set up a new body when there was already a relief fund in the form of the Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund (PMNRF).

Pandey wrote that if in all disasters including floods, storms, money is given from PMNRF, then why not for Covid?

It becomes pertinent to note here that after the Coronavirus pandemic gripped the country, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had set up the PM CARES Fund and invited people to contribute to the Fund. PM CARES Fund Trust was formed on 27th March this year to receive public donations to fight emergencies or distresses like the current Covid-19 pandemic. Prime Minister is the Chairman of this trust, and its members include Defence Minister, Home Minister and Finance Minister.

After the PM CARES fund was set up by the government, opposition parties and a section of left-liberal intellectuals had launched a campaign against it, alleging that the fund will be misused as it will not be audited by the CAG. Congress president Sonia Gandhi had demanded that the entire money collected in the fund should be transferred to the PM National Relief Fund.

‘Cash? Why don’t you be happy this YouTube video instead?’ homestay owner accuses journalists of ‘cheating’ him after ‘free stay’

On September 22, Aditya Dicky Singh, a homestay owner, accused YouTubers Dhiraj Singh and journalist Sahar Zaman of not paying bills for their stay at Alsisar Nahargarh, Ranthambore.

Sharing on Twitter, Singh stated that, Dhiraj and Sahar went to Ranthambore for a vacation. They contacted Singh, who is in the process of building an expensive Homestay, “The Ranthambhore Bagh”, in village Khilchipur, Ranthambore. They asked him if they could stay at his place.

Aditya shared further that as the place was not ready yet, he arranged for their stay at Alsisar Nahargarh close to his place. He also got them a 50% discount for their stay. Singh alleged that the night they arrived, he went to meet them and had a drink, for which he paid himself. For the next three nights, the couple visited Singh’s place for dinner.

On the third day, they did an interview of Singh and took some footage that he had shot at Ranthambore National Park. He said, “basically made a video on me using my footage.”

Singh further said that on the night before the checkout, the Youtubers contacted him again and requested if he could get them a better discount. Singh obliged and said it was possible. They all agreed that they would send the final amount to Nahargarh’s account once Singh inform them about it after negotiation.

Things went on the wrong track when Singh asked them to pay. He alleged that Dhiraj sent him a message that as they charge Rs. 30,000 to Rs.50,000 for posting videos on Hunar TV’s YouTube channel, the couple do not owe anything to Singh. Singh said, “Their channel has 900 subscribers – so much for traction.”

He added that the Manager of Nahargarh told him over the call that a legal team from the Times Of India group had called him and informed him about the legal action they were planning to take for allegedly threatening the reporter Sahar Zaman. While laughing over the notice, Singh said, “Pay you bills cheapskates. Asking you to pay up for your vacation is ‘threatening’.”

On September 23, Singh published a follow-up tweet in which he added a screenshot sent by Hunar TV informing him that they had sent him a legal notice as well. He said, “Just got a notice from their lawyer. What say shall we take this to the court.”

Hunar TV, Dhiraj Singh and Sahar Zaman have not issued any statement yet.

Was the 1921 Malabar genocide the first time that Moplah Muslims massacred Hindus? List of 50 incidents that preceded the 1921 genocide

The 1921 Malabar Hindu genocide has often been touted as a ‘peasant uprising’ against the Landlords. Shashi Tharoor had recently commented that there is one “version of history” which says that the peasants, who were overwhelmingly Muslims rose up against the mistreatment by the Landlords, who were overwhelmingly Hindus. Saying so, an assertion was made that what happened in 1921 was not a genocide of Hindus by Muslim mobs, but an uprising against landlords. This theory has been debunked in the primary sources if one cares to read them.

In the book The Moplah Rebellion, 1921 written by Diwan Bahadur C. Gopalan Nair, he narrates how even before the Moplah massacre of Hindus, intermittently, there were times when Muslims went into a frenzy and slaughtered Hindus. He writes how the Muslims would sometimes go into their “Hal Ilakam” (Religious frenzy) and not only slaughter Hindus but also desecrate their temples. 

At that time, one MR TL Strange as the special commissioner in Malabar to understand what the cause of these frenzied episodes are. In an 1852 report, Mr Strange wrote: 

“It is apparent that in no insistence can any outbreak or threat of outbreak that has risen be attributed to the oppression of tenants by landlords. A great clamour is now raised on this regard, prominently in the southern taluks visited by me, the Moplah population seeking to throw the blame of these outbreaks upon the landlords by thus charging them with being the cause thereof. I have given the subject every attention and am convinced that though instances may and do arise of individual hardship of the tenant, the general character of the dealing of the Hindu landlords towards their tenantry, whether Moplah or Hindu, is mild, equitable and forbearing. I am further convinced that where stringent measures are taken, the conduct of the tenants is in the vast majority of cases, the cause thereof and that the Moplah tenantry, especially of the Taluks in the South Malabar, where the outbreaks have been so common are very prone to evade their obligations and to resort to false and litigious pleas”.

He further said:

“A ‘feature that has been manifestly common to the whole of these affairs is that they have been one and all marked by the most decided fanaticism, and this, there can be no doubt, has ‘furnished the true incentive to them. The Hindus in the parts where the outbreaks have been most frequent, stand in such fear of the Moplahs as mostly not to dare to press for their rights against them, and there is many a Moplah tenant who does not pay his rent, and cannot, so imminent are the risks, be evicted”.

While there are several such testaments and reports that prove that the Malabar Genocide of Hindus was hardly a peasant uprising against the landlords, the narrative of the Left has prevailed over the years, whitewashing a heinous part of Hindu history.

Apart from direct testimonies that refute the ‘peasant uprising’ theory, there are at least 50 documented cases of Moplah ‘outrages’ against Hindus in the same general area that give credence to the fact that the 1921 Genocide was not an isolated event where Muslims went on the war-path to murder Kafirs.

One of the first recorded outbreaks, when Moplah Muslims massacred Hindus due to fanaticism, is from 1836 and the process of mindless murder, loot and rape, intermittently continued till 1919. The Malabar genocide broke out in 1921 and the Khilafat movement was officially launched in 1920.

Here is a list of 50 such incidents as recorded by Diwan Bahadur C. Gopalan Nair, the then Deputy Collector of Calicut in his book:

1. 26th November 1836: In Pandalur Ernad, one Kallingal Kunholan stabbed one Chakku Pannikar who subsequently died of his wounds. He also wounded three others and was finally shot down by the Tahsildar on the 28th of November.

2. 15th April 1837: In Kalpatta, Ernad, one Ali Kutti of Chengara Amsom attacked and severely injured one Narayana Moosad and occupied his shop. The Tahsildar and Taluk peons then tried to control him, with the police shooting him down the next day.

3. 5th April 1839: In Pallipuram, Walluvanad one Thorayam Pulakal Athan and some other skilled one Kellil Raman and then set fire to a Hindu temple. They then hid in another Hindu temple where they were shot by the Taluk peon.

4. 6th Apri 1839l: One Mambattodi Kuttiathan wounded a Hindu man Paru Taragan and a Taluk peon. Was later sentenced and transported for life.

5. 19th April 1940: In Irimbulli, Ernad, one Parathodiyil Ali Kutti wounded one Odayath Kunhunni Nayar and one more person. The Muslim man then set fire to the Kidangil temple. He was later shot dead by Taluk peon on the following day.

6. 5th April 1941: In Pallipuram, Walluvanad, one Tumba Manie Kunyunnian and eight others killed one Perumballi Nambudiri and another person. The fanatics had also burnt his house and 4 other houses. The Moplah Muslims were then neutralised on the 9th of April by the 36th Regiment Native Infantry and the police peons.

7. 13th November 1841: Kaidotti Padil Moidin Kutti and 7 others killed a Hindu man, Tottasseri Tachu Pannikar and a peon. They then hid in a mosque for three days. They were later joined by three other Muslim fanatics on the morning of 17th November. They were later killed by 40 sepoys.

8. 17th November 1841: Around 2,000 Moplah Muslims laid siege against a police party that was guarding the spot where the Muslim fanatics from 13th November were buried. They later carried the bodies and buried them at a Mosque. 12 of these men were convicted and punished.

9. 27th December 1841: One Melemanna Kunyattan with 7 others killed one Talappil Chakku Naik and one more individual. They then took refuge in the Adhikari house. They then got surrounded by the police and also the villagers. They were then killed and their body was buried under the gallows in Calicut.

10. 19th October 1843: In Tirurangadi, one Kunnancheri Ali Atman and 5 others killed a Hindu man Kaprat Krishna Pannikar. After another Moplah Muslim fanatic joined then, they proceeded to Nair’s house to heap more atrocities. They hid out at the house. On the 24th morning, a military detachment was supposed to neutralise them. But when the Moplah Muslims rushed out, the sepoys ran away. Later the Muslim fanatics were killed by the Taluk peons and the villagers. The sepoys who had run away were court-martialed.

11. 4th December 1843: A Nair labourer was found dead with 10 deep wounds on his body. It is believed that the Moplah Muslim fanatics murdered him.

12. 11th December 1843: In Pandicad, one Anavattat Soliman and 9 others killed a Hindu man Karukammana Govind and a servant of his. They also defiled two temples and took shelter in a house. Troops were deputed in the area but when the Moplah Muslims rushed at the troops, they were killed.

13. 19th December 1843: A peon was found with his hand and his head cut off. The perpetrators were Moplah Muslim fanatics.

14. 26th May 1849: In Ernad, one Chakalakkal Kammad wounded one Kannancheri Cheru and one more person. After that, they hid in a mosque. The Tehsildar went to the mosque to convince him to surrender. When he did, the Moplah lunged towards him with a knife and was subsequently killed.

15. 25th August 1849: One Torangal Unniyan killed one Paditodi Theyunni and with Attan Gurukkal and others killed three more people. After that, they took shelter in a Temple and desecrated the temple in Manjeri, including partially burning it down. According to the book, Ensign Wyse was killed when, with the exception of 4 men, refused to advance against the Moplahs and fled. That night, the Moplah Muslims went to the Angadipuram Temple and were followed by a native infantry detachment. The Muslims then attacked and were killed. That night, over 64 Moplah Muslims were killed.

16. 2nd October 1850: The sons of Periambath Attan, the Moplah Adhikari, had concerted with others to kill one Mungamdambalatt Narayana Moosad and them to kill themselves as well.

17. 5th January 1851: In Payyanad Ernad, one Choondyamoochikal Attan attacked and wounded a clerk named Raman Menon. He then shut himself up in the Inspector’s house, defying the police. The Tehsildar tried to get the Moplah to surrender, however, he opened fire. In the process, he was shot dead.

18. 17th January 1851: According to the book, 3 Moplahs were thinking of “contemplating an assault”. The targets were given security.

19. 15th April 1851: Illikot Kunyunni and 5 others were reported as designing to break out and kill one Kotuparambat Komu and others. The information was true, according to the book, but they were discharged.

20. 22nd August 1851: In Kulathur, Walluvanad, in the above-mentioned case where Komu Menon and his servant were killed by 6 Moplah Muslims, with three others, they also killed Kadakottil Nambudiri and Komu Menon’s brother, Raman Menon. They had also severely wounded Mundangara Rarichan Nair, who died later. They set fire to Rama Menon’s house and then they proceeded to Kuluthur and murdered one old person called Kuluthur Variyar and two servants. Later in police action, 17 Moplah Muslims were killed along with one Subhedar and 4 European privates.

21. 5th October 1851: Tottingal Mammad and 3 other Moplah Muslims had planned to commit an ‘outrage’. Security was provided to the targets.

22. 27th October 1851: In Irimbuli, Ernad, security was taken from two Moplah who intended to join the late Kalathur outbreak.

23. 4th January 1852: Choriyot Mayan and 14 others supported by a mob of 200 Moplah Muslims butchered all the inmates, 18 of them, of Kalattil Kesavan Tangal’s house and extirpated the family, defiled temples, burnt houses and finally fell on January 8th on a desperate attack on the house of Kalliad Nambiar.

24. 5th January 1852: Security taken from 5 Moplah Muslims.

25. 28th February 1852: One Triyakaltil Chekku and 15 other Moplah Muslims of Melmuri and Kilmuri Amsoms set out to “die and create a fanatical outbreak”. Security was taken from them.

26. April-May 1852: In Ernad, two Cherumas after converting to Islam returned to their original faith (Hinduism). These Cherumas were then working for the Kudilil Kannu Kutti Nayar who, being a peon, was transferred from Ernad Taluk to Ponnani and subsequently to Calicut to avert the danger to his life. Others who had returned to Hinduism were also transferred to other places to ensure there was no disturbance.

27. 9th August 1852: In Kurumbranad, 3 Moplah Muslims took up a position in a house of a village accountant (Puttur) and had resolved to die as ‘Shahids’. They wounded a Brahmin and were killed by the police on 12th August.

28. 16th September 1853: In Angadipuram, Kunnumal Moidin and Cherukavil Moidin murdered a Hindu man Chengalary Vasudevan Nambudiri. The Moplah Muslims were not getting any ‘recruits’ so they proceeded. to the top of a hill near Angadipuram. The Tehsildar proceeded there with his peons but the fanatics charged at them. 18 shots were fired and the elder man was brought down wounded. The younger unhurt fell on the peons and the villagers by whom he was dispatched.

29. 12th September 1855: In Calicut, 3 Moplahs – Valasseri Emalu, Puliyakunat Tenu, Chemban Moidin Kutti and Vallattadayyatta Parambil Moidin escaped from their working party of Jail convicts at Calicut and proceeded to Walluvanad. They roamed about the country and on the 10th September reached Calicut. On the 12th, they murdered Collector Mr Conolly at his Bungalow. The assassins were shot on 17th September by a detachment of Major Haley’s Police Corps and a part No. 5 Company of HM’s 74th High landers. A fine of Rs 38,331.80 was collected from the villages implicated in the outrage and Rs 30,936 was paid to Mrs Conolly.

30. November 1855: 2 Moplahs, who had deserted from the Malabar police corps, were suspected of complicity with the murderers of Mr Collony and were required to produce securities for good behaviour and were confined, on the failure to give securities, for 3 years. They were later allowed to leave the country.

31. August 1857: In Ponmala, Poovadan Kunhappa Haji and 7 other Moplah Muslims were suspected of conspiring to revenge the supposed insult offered to their religion by the relapse of a Nair convert, and to make an attempt to rid the country of the Kaffirs representing the Government was weakened by the mutiny in Northern India. The conspirators were surprised and taken prisoners and seven of them were deported under the Moplah Outrages Act.

32. February 1858: In Tirurangadi, Ernad, a Moplah who purchased a piece of ground which was the scene of the death struggles of the Moplahs killed in the outbreak of 19th October 1943, had built a small mosque there and had instituted a day for holding a festival. The number of visitors had increased and the feast assumed a threatening character. The Moplah purchaser and two Mullahs were deported.

33. North Malabar, 1860: Two Moplahs were deported for short terms for threatening the life of an Adhigari.

34. 4th February 1864: In Melmuri, during the Ramzan feast, a Moplah named Attan Kutti in a fit of religious fanaticism stabbed and caused the death of one Notta Pannikkar whom he found in the house of Tiyyan, his intended victim. Attan was sentenced to be hanged as an ordinary malefactor, and his confederate deported, the village being fined to the extent of Rs 2037.

35. 17th September 1865: 3 Moplahs were convicted of murdering one Shangu Nair of the Nenmini Amsam and it was thought that the murder was committed due to personal and private motives. However, a religious cloak was thrown around the affair by the performance three days before the murder of a Muvalad ceremony at which several persons were present who knew of the intended murder. 6 of them were deported.

36. 8th September 1973: In Paral, Kunhappa Musaliar visited the Velichapad or Oracle of Tuthekil temple, struck him with several blows with a sword and left him for the dead. They proceeded to Kolathur and attacked a member of Kolathur Varier’s family and mortally wounded him. Troops from Malappuram surrounded the house and the fanatics attacked them. Of the nine fanatics 8 were killed and one a “mere child” was wounded and afterwards recovered. The villages concerned were fined Rs 42,000.

37. 27th March 1877: In Irimbulli, Avinjipurath Kunhi Moideen and 4 other Moplah Muslims designed to commit a fanatical outrage as a Nair had debauched the wife of one of the men. Two of the conspirators elected to leave Malabar for Mecca to which place they were sent and Kunhi Moideen was ‘bound’ for good behaviour.

38. June 1879: In Paral, Kunnanath Kunhi Moidu incited 6 young men to commit an outrage but before accomplishing their object they were arrested. The ring leader was deported.

39. 9th September 1880: In Melattur, M Ali deliberately cut the throat of a Cheruma lad who had become a convert to Islam and had reconverted. He then wounded a potter on the next day. He was shot and killed by a watchman when he went to the house of the intended victims. 7 Moplahs were deported for this and some were fined.

40. June 1879: Kunnanath Kunhi Moidu incited 6 men to commit an outrage but before accomplishing their object they were arrested. The ring leader was deported.

41. 4th March 1884: A petition was received by the authorities that 2 Moplahs were planning to kill a Hindu called Appathara Pattar. Two ringleaders were deported.

42. 18th June 1884: Kannacheri Raman who had previously embraced Islam and had then reconverted to Hinduism was attacked in the most savage manner, according to the book. The attack was carried out by 2 Moplah Muslims. 3 Moplahs were transported for life and 3 others were deported.

43. 28th December 1884: Because of the deportations and fines imposed, the Moplah Muslims were angry. One Kolakadam Kuyyyassam and 11 others proceeded to the house of Raman’s brother Choyikutti who was greeted by a volley of forearms that the Moplah Muslims were carrying. After this, they set fire to the Hindu’s house. On the way to leaving Malappuram, they mortally wounded one Brahmin man and proceeded to the Trikalur temple. The troops surrounded the temple where the Moplah Muslims were hiding and opened fire at the temple. Then they blasted the door with dynamite to get entry. Of the 12 Muslims, 3 were still alive and 2 had died immediately.

44. 1st May 1885: A gang of Moplah Muslims broke open the house of a Hindu man called Kutti Kariyanand and murdered him, his wife and his 4 children. They set the house on fire and also set ablaze a neighbouring temple. The victim had become a convert to Islam and had reverted to Hinduism 14 years ago. The Moplah Muslims after doing this receded to their own areas and on the 2nd May occupied the house of a Brahmin man. On the afternoon of that day, they attacked a party of South Wales Borderers from Malappuram. They opened fire from a window in the top storey of that house at the military and wounded 4 men. In retaliation, all the Moplah Muslims, 12 of them, were killed.

45. 11th August 1885: A Moplah named Unni Mammad entered the house of one Hindu Krishna Pisharodi under the pretence of buying paddy. At that time, the Hindu man was bathing. Mammad Unni (the Moplah Muslim) rushed past the attendant with one blow of a machete and delivered another one on the head of the Hindu man. He was later hanged after a trial.

46. 1894: In this year, a gang of Moplah Muslims in Pandicad started on the warpath. They wandered defiling and burning temples wherever they could besides attacking and killing Nairs and Brahmins on their way. From one such temple, they came out with their usual fury and were then all shot by the police.

47. 1896: In the book, Nair writes that for this particular atrocity that was unleashed on the Hindus, one was pressed to find any trigger. It was just a result of the unbridled Mohammadan fanaticism. On the 25th of February 1896, a gang of 20 Moplah Muslims went on a killing spree from Chembrasseri Amsom and for 5 days, they terrorised the villages. The book says that during this period, Hindus were murdered and/or their Kudumis were cut off. They were forcefully converted to Islam as well. Temples were desecrated rampantly during this massacre and burnt down to ashes. On 1st March, the Muslims entered the Karanammulpad Temple, determined to make their last stand. Shots were exchanged with about 20 soldiers. At 9 AM, the District Magistrate with the main body of the troops and occupied the hill overlooking the temple at a distance of about 750 yards. When the police opened fire, instead of hiding, the Muslim fanatics purposely courted death while they were howling, shouting religious slogans and firing. Advancing steadily with frequent volleys over the broken ground, the police came near the temple to ask the Moplah Muslims to surrender. The Muslims were defiant and the troops ended up entering the temple without resistance. They ended up walking in on the dead bodies, with their throats slit of 92 Moplah Muslims who had been murdered by Muslims themselves to ensure they were not captured alive.

48. April 1898: The Moplahs were ‘revolting’ in Payyanad. But the fanatics surrendered eventually.

49. 1915: In the year 1915, an attempt was made on the life of Mr Innes, the District Magistrate. The Moplah Muslims had then gone on a rampage, murdered and committing arson. They were finally shot down.

50. February 1919: A gang of fanatics headed by dismissed Moplah head constable began to brew trouble. Following their usual methods they broke into and defiled several temples, killed almost every Brahmin and Nair who they came across and finally died at the hands of the police. 4 Brahmins and 2 Nairs had died in this incident.

After the 1919 incident, the Malabar Hindu Genocide broke out in August 1921 where over 10,000 Hindus were mercilessly killed. It was during these mindless fanatic killings by Moplah Muslims that TL Strange was sent as a special commissioner to inquire why the Muslims were intermittently killing the Hindus. In his report, as mentioned above, he had categorically stated that the reason was mindless fanaticism of the Muslims and not a peasant revolt.

The three judges who had presided over a Special Tribunal in Calicut after the Malabar Genocide of Hindus had said:

For the last hundreds of years at least, the Moplah community has been disgraced from time to time by murderous outrages, as appears from the district Gazetteer. In the past, they have been due to fanaticism. They generally blazed out in the Ernad, Taluk, where the Moplahs were for the most part proselytes drawn from the dredges of the Hindu population. These men were miserably and hopelessly ignorant, and their untutored minds were particularly susceptible to the inflammatory teaching that Paradise was to be gained by killing Kaffirs, and the servants of Kaffirs. They would go out on the war path, killing Hindus, no matter whom, and would be joined by other fanatics and then seek death in hand-in-hand conflict with the troops. In some cases, they may have been inspired by hatred of a particular landlord, but no grievance seems to have been really necessary to start them on their wild careers. The Moplahs has been described as a barbarous and a savage race and unhappily the description seems appropriate at the present day. But it was not mere fanaticism, it was not agrarian trouble, it was not destitution, that worked on the minds of Ali Musalair and his followers. The evidence conclusively shows that it was the influence of the Khilafat and the non-cooperation movements that drove them to their crime. It is this which distinguishes the present from all previous outbreaks. Their intention was, absurd though it may seem, to subvert the British Government and to substitute a Khilafat Government by force of arms.

This was an excerpt from the Judgement in case number 7 of 1921 on the file of Special Tribunal, Calicut.

This judgement itself clearly shows that for 100 years before 1921, Moplah Muslims had gone on the warpath and massacred Hindus. They did so then owing to their Islamic fanaticism. What was different about the 1921 genocide of Hindus was not that they were doing it to support India’s freedom struggle but to establish a Khilafat Government inlace of the British. A Khilafat government here means nothing but an Islamic caliphate. It is to be kept in mind that this was the movement summarily and wholeheartedly supported by Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. To date, the narrative about the Malabar Hindu Genocide has been distorted to whitewash the horrors faced by the Hindus of Malabar, to insinuate that the murders of Hindus were retribution for Hindu landlords mistreating Muslim peasants. The reality, however, is far from it.