Home Blog Page 733

Assam: Hindu students given beef at Carmel School by Manipuri students, parents protest

0

In Assam’s Guwahati, an uproar has erupted over allegations of Hindu students allegedly being fed beef at the Carmel School in Rani by Manipuri students during lunch break. The incident is reported to have transpired on 19th September. However, it was only revealed after parents were notified, and they later held a protest outside the school on Tuesday (24th September). During the protests, “Manipuri go back” slogans were also raised.

The school administration reportedly attempted to downplay the matter. The school principal is alleged to have threatened the affected Assamese Hindu students to prevent them from speaking out against the violation of their faith. In reaction to the incident, parents filed an FIR with the Rani police station, citing the school’s irresponsibility and failure to address the allegations appropriately.

“I am not sure whether it was beef meat or not, but my daughter told me that it was beef mixed with Maggie. The principal didn’t respond to our queries,” one of the parents of a student at Carmel School in Guwahati said.

“We want the Manipuri community students to be expelled from the school. The incident occurred on Thursday, but I only found out about it on Friday evening when a nearby shopkeeper informed me that beef was served on the school premises. My son, who also studies there, told me that some Manipuri students were distributing beef. I had previously warned him not to eat any meat offered by that community, as it could be beef. On Thursday, when a Manipuri student gave him the meat, he tasted it and asked what kind it was, and a classmate told him it was beef,” another parent said.

There are also reports that the Manipuri students also assaulted the local students and complaints were made to school authorities about this but no action was taken. Parents have expressed concern about the school’s administration practices, saying that government educational guidelines are not being followed.

Meanwhile, the Palashbari revenue circle officer, alongside police and paramilitary troops, has been dispatched to the area to handle the situation and conduct additional investigations.

Chhattisgarh: Riyaz poses as Gulshan and marries Hindu woman in a temple, starts torturing and threatening her to convert to Islam after having a child

0

In Chhattisgarh’s Raigarh district, a Hindu woman has submitted a written complaint to the district collector, accusing a man named Riyaz of deceit and coercing her into an illegal religious conversion.

The woman, originally a resident of Tripura, said in her statement that, about 4 years ago, Riyaz, originally belonging to Jammu and Kashmir, befriended her on social media pretending to be Gulshan Manhas, a Hindu. A few months later, the accused married her in a temple as per Hindu customs, but after she had a child with him, he began pressuring her to convert to Islam. He assaulted and threatened her with life when she refused to accede to his demands.

The vcitim said that in the year 2021, Riyaz called her to Andhra Pradesh promising to marry her. The woman went to Andhra Pradesh a few days later without informing her family. In June 2021, the couple was married in a temple following Hindu customs in Vradapalam city, Andhra Pradesh. Following their marriage, they settled into a rented house in the same city.

The woman recalled how Riyaz would always dodge her questions about his family and instead say, “I am a good person… I didn’t deceive you.”

On December 7, 2022, the victim gave birth to a son in a private hospital, whom she named Gurdeep. Approximately four months later, the accused took the woman to Jammu, claiming he was taking her to his home. He mentioned that the village he lived in was called Kandi.

In her application, the woman further stated that after Gulshan took her to his house, she noticed that the environment of his house was completely different from hers, raising her suspicions about his religion. One day, when Gulshan slaughtered a chicken at home, witnessing how he did it confirmed her doubts that he was not a Hindu. Despite this realization, she remained calm and decided to seek further clarity.

One day when Gulshan was not at home, the woman began asking around about him. She noted that when she inquired in Muslim households, everyone would defend Gulshan. However, when she spoke with people from Hindu families, she discovered that Gulshan’s real name was Riyaz Ahmed and that he was a Muslim.

Upon discovering this, the accused’s family and some members of the community began pressuring her to convert to Islam. When she refused, Gulshan physically assaulted her, threatening to kill her if she did not comply, but she remained steadfast in her decision. Subsequently, she attempted to escape with her child several times but was unsuccessful. Although she filed a report at the Kandi police station, no action was taken. Eventually, seizing an opportunity, she managed to leave the house and made her way to Delhi and then to Rajasthan. However, the accused tracked her using her mobile location and found her there as well, forcibly taking her back to his home.

Once taken back to his home, she and her child were confined indoors for approximately five months. Eventually, she managed to find an opportunity to escape and made her way to Chhattisgarh. Upon arriving in the village of Bhikhampura in the Sarangarh district, she connected with a local NGO. Currently, she is residing there and teaching children through the organization.

On Monday, September 23, she travelled from the village to the Raigarh Collectorate, where she filed a written complaint against Riyaz Ahmed aka Gulshan. She has also sought help at the SP office.

Maharashtra: Woman dies after botched abortion at home, husband, father-in-law arrested, mother-in-law booked too

0

 In a shocking incident, a 24-year-old woman died after a clandestine abortion procedure was performed on her at her residence in Pune, Maharashtra

Following the incident, the police arrested the woman’s husband and father-in-law. The deceased’s mother-in-law was also booked in connection with the case.

According to the police, the investigation revealed that the four-month-old foetus was buried in the family’s farm.

A private doctor, who was summoned to perform the abortion, is also under scrutiny, police said.

The deceased woman had married the accused in 2017 and had two children, a girl and a boy, before becoming pregnant for the third time. Police suspect that when the family discovered the foetus was female, they arranged for the abortion at home.

“On Sunday, the woman’s condition worsened due to heavy bleeding. She was taken to the hospital the next day but died en route,” an officer from the Indapur police station said.

The FIR was filed based on the complaint of the deceased woman’s brother. After this, her husband and father-in-law were arrested.

The foetus was exhumed from the farm and sent for a postmortem.

Police have registered the case at the Indapur Police station of Pune Rural Police under sections 91, 90, and 85 of the BNS, and further investigation is underway in the case.


(This news report is published from a syndicated feed. Except for the headline, the content has not been written or edited by OpIndia staff)

Goa: Illegal slaughterhouse operating in residential area raided, 2 bovines and over 800 kgs of animal fat recovered; accused Aslam was using it to produce Ghee

0

On September 22, Bajrang Dal members, with the assistance of officials from the Animal Husbandry Department and Margao police, raided an illegal slaughterhouse operating in a residential area in Khareband, Goa. Reports suggest that the owner, Aslam Bepari, along with his family members, was allegedly butchering bovines and producing ghee from animal fat for sale in local markets in the basement of a four-storey building.

During the raid, authorities recovered two bovines, 41 containers of animal fat (each weighing 20 kg), teak logs, large ropes, weapons, and dry, rotten meat packed in tins.

According to reports, the Margao police were alerted when some youths intercepted a vehicle transporting four bulls to the site. Although the youths attempted to stop the vehicle, they were unsuccessful and followed it to a residential building in Khareband. The perpetrators fled, leaving behind the four animals. However, by the time the group informed the police and authorities arrived, two animals had disappeared, though the group managed to rescue the remaining two.

On September 23, Margao police registered the offence under various sections, including Section 325 R/w 3 (5) of the BNS, Sections 4, 5, 8, and 10 of The Goa Animal Preservation Act, and Sections 3, 5, and 8 of The Goa, Daman, and Diu Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. They also invoked Section 11 (1) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, based on a complaint filed by Bhagwan Redkar of Dakshin Goa Sansad.

This case has raised significant concerns, particularly in light of the widespread controversy involving the famous Laddu Prasadam of Tirupati Balaji temple in Tirumala, which was reportedly found to contain ghee adulterated with animal fat.

Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah says he has Congress High Command’s support after Karnataka HC upholds sanction for corruption probe

0

Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah accused the BJP of revenge politics and referred to the MUDA land scam case as a ‘sham’ after the High Court dismissed his petition challenging the Governor’s sanction for a probe against him. The High Court’s decision has prompted calls for Siddaramaiah’s resignation from the BJP. In response to the scandal, Siddaramaiah said that the BJP-led Centre was plotting to punish governments in opposition-ruled states by misusing Raj Bhavan. 

“The MUDA case is just a sham. The main objective of BJP and JDS is to stop our government’s schemes which favour the poor and the oppressed. I request the people of the state to see the faces of those who are making false allegations,” he said.

“I will not hesitate to face investigation. I will consult with experts on whether such an investigation is allowed under law or not. I will discuss with the legal experts and decide the outline of the fight,” he added. The Chief Minister claimed that the BJP and JD(S) were using political revenge against him because of his pro-poor reputation and advocacy for social justice. He claimed that the BJP was plotting the demise of the Congress government in Karnataka because it was frustrated by its defeat in last year’s Assembly elections.

“The people of Karnataka have not given the BJP enough majority to come to power on its own. So far, the BJP has come to power by conducting Operation Kamala unethically. In the last Assembly elections, the people of the state gave our party a strength of 136 seats without giving any chance to Operation Kamala,” he said.

“Frustrated by this, the BJP and JDS leaders have taken advantage of Raj Bhavan and made false allegations against me to disturb our government,” he alleged. He claimed that all MLAs, leaders, and Congress workers supported him and pushed him to continue fighting for the bill. 

“Throughout my 40 years of political life, I have faced such revenge and conspiracy politics and I have been winning with the strength of the blessings and wishes of the people of the state. I am confident that I will win this fight with the strength of people’s blessings,” he said. “The same leaders who are asking for my resignation are the same ones who opposed the schemes that I implemented for the poor and the oppressed of the state,” he further said.

The Karnataka High Court today dismissed Siddaramaiah’s petition to rescind Governor Thawar Chand Gehlot’s clearance for an investigation into the chief minister’s role in the alleged MUDA land scam. In its conclusion, the High Court stated that the Governor can make independent decisions if exceptional circumstances arise and that his order does not suffer from non-application of mind.

The bench stressed that the facts described in the plea required further investigation before it could be dismissed. In July, the Governor approved a probe into Siddaramaiah in response to accusations from three activists: TJ Abraham, Snehamai Krishna, and Pradeep Kumar SP. The lawsuit involves claims that Siddaramaiah’s wife, BM Parvathi, was given compensation sites in an upmarket region of Mysuru with a higher property worth than the location of her land, which had been acquired by MUDA.

MUDA had allotted plots to Parvathi under a 50:50 ratio program in exchange for 3.16 acres of her land, where MUDA created a residential layout. Siddaramaiah has refuted the claims against him in the land fraud case, while the BJP has sought his resignation. 

Uttar Pradesh: Satyam, who disappeared at the age of 10, and became Sameer Khan, was brainwashed to the extent that he doesn’t even want to live with his family

On Saturday (14 September 2024) in Rampur district of Uttar Pradesh, an accused named Rashid, accused in a conversion case, had an encounter with the police. Rashid was injured in this encounter and was subsequently arrested by the police.

Rashid was absconding for the last 19 years. Rashid is accused of converting a Hindu child, who went missing from his home in 2005, to Islam. Illegal weapons and ammunition have also been recovered from Rashid. The child named Satyam, who is now 30 years old, has been converted and his name has been changed to Sameer Khan during this time. Talking to OpIndia, Satyam’s mother told that her son has been brainwashed to such an extent that he is no longer ready to live with his family.

Satyam who disappeared 19 years ago was converted to Sameer Khan

This case is from Shahabad police station area of ​​Rampur district. Here, on 13th September, a woman named Manju Devi had lodged a complaint with the police. In the complaint, Manju said that in the year 2005, her 10-year-old son Satyam suddenly went missing. Then the victim lodged a complaint in Pilkhua police station of Hapur. The news of the child’s disappearance was also published in the newspapers. After a lot of investigation, Manju found out that her son lives in Rashid’s house in Rampur district.

Manju Devi reached Rampur in search of the child, there she met her son. Manju’s son told her that in 2005, he was first taken to Delhi. From there, junk dealer Rashid brought the child with him to Rampur. Rashid kept the child with him and made him convert to Islam by luring him with money. After a few days, Satyam’s name was changed to Sameer Khan. A new Aadhar card was also made in which Sameer’s father’s name was printed as Wajid Khan.

Tamil director Mohan G claims impotency drugs mixed with Palani Temple prasadam, arrested

0

On 24th September, popular Tamil director Mohan G was arrested for making shocking claims that certain medicines were being mixed with “panchamirtham” (prasadam or religious offering) served at the Palani Temple which caused impotency in men. The claims were made during an interview on a YouTube channel while commenting on the Tirupati Temple prasadam controversy, where ghee adulterated with animal fat was allegedly used to prepare the famous Tirupati laddus. The cybercrime unit of the Trichy Police arrested Mohan G. Trichy District SP Varun Kumar said in a statement that the producer was arrested on Tuesday and brought to Trichy.

Speaking on the controversy during the interview, he claimed that similar incidents had occurred in Tamil Nadu as well. Known for films like Rudrathandavam, Draupathi, and Begasuran, Mohan G said, “I heard that medicines causing impotency in men were mixed with panchamirtham. That news was hidden, and the panchamirtham was destroyed. We shouldn’t speak without proof, but no proper explanation was given. Those working there told me that birth control pills were used as an attack on Hindus.”

Reacting to the claims, Sekar Babu, Minister of Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments in Tamil Nadu, issued a warning, stating that strict action would be taken against those spreading false news about Palani Temple panchamirtham.

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), on the other hand, condemned the arrest, calling it unconstitutional. BJP leader Ashwathaman Allimuthu alleged that the director’s family was not informed about the reason for the arrest. He said, “No formal information was given to the family about the cause or the case. This is against the Supreme Court order.”

Tirupati Laddu Prasadam controversy

On 18 September Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu accused the previous YS Jagan Mohan Reddy administration of using animal fat in making laddus served at the renowned Hindu temple during his address at the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) legislative party meeting. “They (YSRC government) not only provided substandard food to the devotees, such as Anna Prasadam in Tirumala, but also used inferior quality ingredients to make Prasadam, which is offered to Lord Venkateswara. Instead of using pure ghee, they used animal fat,” he charged.

The chief minister further added, “Today, we are using pure ghee and cleansed the system in the temple. Quality of Prasadam and food have improved and steps are being taken to make further improvements.” His statement was eventually validated by the test findings. The conclusions drawn by the report revealed that there were residues of animal fat in the ghee used to prepare iconic Tirupati laddu prasadam. Furthermore, ingredients like soybean, sunflower, olive, rapeseed, linseed, wheat germ, maize germ, cotton seed, coconut, palm kernel fat, and palm oil were also used in making the laddus.

After that, a laboratory report emerged, which showed that ghee used by the Tirupati temple contained beef fat, pig fat, fish oil, and various types of plant-based oil, and the content of dairy fat was very low. The test was conducted by the National Dairy Development Board’s “Centre of Analysis and Learning in Livestock and Food” (CALF) laboratory on behalf of Tirumala Tirupathi Devastanam. TTD had decided to test the ghee after receiving multiple complaints about the deteriorating quality and taste of its famous laddus.

TTD has already started blacklisting the suppliers of ghee after the report came out.

Andhra Pradesh: CM Chandrababu Naidu orders investigation into Sri Ramalayam chariot burning

0

On 23rd September, at midnight, a scared temple chariot at Lord Rama’s in Hanakanahal village, Kanekal Mandal, Anantapur district, was set on fire, which left devotees furious at the blatant act of attacking their religious sentiments. The local police and fire services were notified by locals who witnessed the fire at the chariot shelter. The fire was contained after many hours. The chariot was partly burnt down in the incident.

The chariot, which was kept at the village’s Ramalayam, was partially burned in the fire, according to confirmation from local authorities. P. Jagadeesh, the district Superintendent of Police (SP), rushed to the location upon receiving the information and began the investigation. Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) Ravi Babu of Kalyandurg also went to Hanakanahal hamlet to examine the chariot and also asked the locals about the occurrence.

According to reports, the chariot had burned by the time villagers and fire service officials arrived. With the use of nearby CCTV footage, police are looking into the incident and making an effort to identify the offenders. Meanwhile, Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Chandra Babu Naidu has also expressed shock over the instance. Chief Minister Office (CMO) informed that he “condemned the heinous act” and vowed that, “this constitutes an assault on our culture and values, and such acts of desecration will not be tolerated.”

The office informed that he directed officials, including the District Collector and the SP, to visit the location right away and begin a comprehensive inquiry to apprehend the perpetrators as soon as possible. It further added, “He promised that the perpetrators of this vile act will face the full force of the law, and he shall personally oversee the investigation to ensure swift and decisive action.”

The chief minister gave the officials instructions to regularly inform him of the investigation’s status and apprehend the culprits as soon as possible. A group consisting of three to four persons who are rivals of the donor of the temple chariot are being investigated by the authorities and the cops are collecting proof to apprehend them. The SP claimed that there was no communal angle to the incident.

Meanwhile, Andhra Pradesh has been in the headlines after animal fat, including beef tallow, lard (pig fat) and fish oil, was found in the ghee used for the preparation of laddus at the prominent Sri Venkateswara temple in Tirupati under the YSR Congress Party (YSRCP) government which led to a major controversy. Notably, on 18th September Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu accused the previous YS Jagan Mohan Reddy administration of using animal fat in making laddus served at the renowned Hindu temple during his address at the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) legislative party meeting.

“They (YSRC government) not only provided substandard food to the devotees, such as Anna Prasadam in Tirumala, but also used inferior quality ingredients to make Prasadam, which is offered to Lord Venkateswara. Instead of using pure ghee, they used animal fat,” he charged. The chief minister further added, “Today, we are using pure ghee and cleansed the system in the temple. Quality of Prasadam and food have improved and steps are being taken to make further improvements.” His statement was eventually verified by the test report.

Lucknow: Mohd Danish and his accomplice abduct 5th-standard-girl, take her to a hotel, rape her and record her obscene video, threaten to kill her family

0

In Lucknow, a shocking case of gangrape has been reported wherein a minor girl was sexually assaulted by two Muslim youths on Monday (23rd September). The matter pertains to the Sarojini Nagar Police Station precinct wherein a 5th-class student was forcibly made to sit in a car by Mohammad Danish and his accomplice when the victim was returning from school.

The accused duo took the minor girl to a hotel and raped her. They also video-recorded their crime and used it to threaten the victim to not disclose the incident to anyone or her family would be killed. Later, at around 4 pm, the two accused dropped the 13-year-old girl near her house and left.

As the victim’s family saw her in a distraught state, they inquired about what happened and the girl informed about the horrific deeds of the accused Mohammad Danish (19) and his accomplice. The victim’s father went to Krishna Nagar Police Station first, however, as they refused to register the complaint since it pertains to Sarojini Nagar Police Station precinct, he approached there and submitted his complaint. Subsequently, the police launched searches and took one of the accused into custody while searches to nab the other one are on.

The victim has been sent for medical examination. Deputy Commissioner of Police (South) said that further action in the matter will be taken on the basis of the evidence collected.

Setback to CM Siddaramaiah explained: In MUDA scam CM prima facie bent rules to favour his family, says HC. Read about the scam and what court said

0

On 24th September, the Karnataka High Court dismissed the petition filed by the Chief Minister of the state, Siddaramaiah, in which he challenged the Governor’s approval to investigate and prosecute him under Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 218 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with the alleged Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA) scam. The Karnataka HC noted it is difficult to accept CM #Siddaramaiah was not “behind the curtain” during the entire transaction of #Muda land, in which his family allegedly benefitted approximately Rs 56 Crores.

The judgment was passed by a single-judge bench, Justice M. Nagaprasanna. He observed that the complainants were justified in filing their complaint and seeking approval from the Governor, which was required under Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Karnataka HC further noted that the Governor has the power to independently decide on such matters without seeking advice from the Council of Ministers, especially in cases with exceptional circumstances, such as when the Chief Minister himself is involved.

Justice Nagaprasanna noted, “The facts narrated in the petition undoubtedly warrant investigation, considering that the beneficiary of the alleged acts is not an external party but the petitioner’s own family.” Dismissing the petition, Justice Nagaprasanna affirmed that an inquiry into the matter was necessary in light of the details presented.

The court clarified the application of Section 17A, ruling, “Approval under Section 17A does not require a police officer to seek it in cases of private complaints registered under Section 200 of the Criminal Procedure Code or Section 220 of the BNSS against a public servant. It is the responsibility of the complainant to obtain such approval.”

Regarding the question of whether the Governor must act on the advice of the Council of Ministers, Karnataka HC noted, “In normal circumstances, the Governor must act on the advice of the Council of Ministers, but in exceptional situations, such as the present case, he can exercise independent discretion.” Justice Nagaprasanna further added that the court did not find any fault in the Governor’s decision to act independently in granting approval for the investigation into the Chief Minister. The court emphasised that it was sufficient if the reasoning behind such decisions was recorded in the official file.

Furthermore, the court ruled that the Governor’s orders did not suffer from any “non-application of mind.” The court stated that the decision, in fact, displayed an “abundance of application of mind.” The court also clarified that a personal hearing was not necessary under Section 17A, though if needed, the authority could choose to offer one.

The court dismissed the claims that the Governor acted in “hot haste” and held that the order was limited to approval under Section 17A and did not extend to granting prosecution sanction under Section 218 of the BNSS.

Notably, on 17th August, the Governor of Karnataka sanctioned an inquiry against CM Siddaramaiah in the alleged multi-crore MUDA scam. The CM then approached the Karnataka HC seeking directions to quash the sanction against him. The High Court had directed the trial court to defer all proceedings against CM Siddaramaiah until the next hearing.

In his plea, CM Siddaramaiah argued that the orders passed by the Governor lacked any justification for considering him prima facie guilty. He claimed that the discretionary powers of the Governor in such matters were limited. Appearing for CM Siddaramaiah, Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi emphasised that public servants have statutory protections that need to be respected. He further argued that there was a protective framework in place for elected officials, ensuring that investigations are not used as political tools to undermine an electoral mandate.

Arguing on the applicability of the Prevention of Corruption Act, Singhvi said that the alleged offence occurred in 2005, and the provisions of Section 17A, which came into effect in 2018, could not be applied retrospectively. He also argued that the Governor did not provide any responses to his defence and had merely cited the dates of pending complaints.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta represented the Governor’s office in Karnataka HC to oppose CM Siddaramaiah’s plea. He argued that the sanction granted by the Governor came after a comprehensive examination of the case. He pointed out that, at the stage of approval under Section 17A, there is no requirement for natural justice principles, such as issuing a notice. Furthermore, he argued that the Governor acted independently as the Chief Minister was facing allegations, and the Governor was under no obligation to act on the advice of the Council of Ministers in this particular instance.

The complainants argued that the Governor’s sanction should not be seen as adversarial but as a measure to ensure transparency and integrity in public administration. They contended that approval under Section 17A was not mandatory but permissible, and it was sought appropriately in this case.

Background of MUDA Scam

On 10th July, a complaint was filed against Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and nine others for allegedly forging documents to claim compensation from the Mysuru Urban Development Authority (MUDA). Social activist Snehamayi Krishna has filed the complaint. It has accused Siddaramaiah, his wife Parvathy, his brother-in-law Mallikarjuna Swamy Devaraj, who claimed to be a landowner, and his family of ‘wrongdoings’.

It is pertinent to note that earlier, CM Siddaramaiah rejected the BJP’s demand for a CBI probe in this matter. In his defence, he demanded Rs 62 from MUDA claiming that it “usurped” his family’s 3.16-acre land for a development project. However, the Chief Minister’s demand soon sparked an outrage among the Bengaluru farmers. They accused the administration of following separate rules for the Chief Minister and state farmers. Additionally, they have also started to demand higher compensation from MUDA for acquiring their land for key development projects.

Major developments in the alleged MUDA scam and the ongoing controversy explained

Evidently, a major controversy over the reported allotment of 14 pricey plots to CM Siddaramaiah’s family in Mysuru has rocked the state politics of Karnataka. The Bharatiya Janata Party has been demanding a CBI probe in this matter. It has alleged irregularities and a scam in the land acquisition and allotment of an alternate site. 

According to the allegations, MUDA generally follows a 60:40 ratio in development projects meaning that it gives 40% of land back to the farmers in the same developed project. However, it is alleged that MUDA not only followed a 50:50 ratio in CM Siddaramaiah’s case but also allocated pricy plots at a different location.  

BJP has alleged that Siddaramaiah helped himself with the allotment of 14 plots in the upscale Vijayanagar locality in Mysuru in exchange for giving up 3 acres 16 guntas of land on the city outskirts to Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA). It has charged CM’s family with accepting Rs 35 crore worth of plots in place of earlier decided compensation of Rs 3 lakh.

OpIndia’s detailed report on MUDA Scam can be checked here and here.