While Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul now positions himself as a staunch defender of judicial integrity and procedure through his upcoming memoir, a closer examination of his judicial track record reveals a career marked by deeply contentious rulings, persistent accusations of hurting public and religious sentiments, severe institutional conflicts, and questionable associations.
A Delhi District Court has dismissed a plea by advocate Mehmood Pracha seeking to nullify the Supreme Court's landmark 2019 Ayodhya judgment, labelling it...
An addendum to the 2019 Supreme Court judgment by an unnamed judge went into depth of the beliefs of the Hindus regarding Ram Janmabhoomi by referring to certain Historical evidence, including Ain-i-Akbari, accounts of an English merchant William Finch, accounts of a Jesuit missionary Father Joseph Tieffenthaler and a description in Janma Sakhies of Guru Nanak’s visit to Ayodhya.
The Supreme Court has asked the Centre to take back possession of a government bungalow occupied by former CJI DY Chandrachud. The stay exceeded the allowed post-retirement period, despite previous extensions granted under special circumstances.
Attorney General R Venkatramani said, “I have received some information…I'll share it, information is confidential, sensitive, I'd like to place it on record.”