Home Blog Page 3725

Instagram disables political satire account of Wokeflix for 30 days for allegedly violating its Community Guidelines

Social Media platform Instagram has disabled the political satire account of Wokeflix for 30 days. Wokeflix’s Twitter account that claims to be the vaccine for Woke’ism or Woke culture has tweeted about the step taken by Instagram.

Instagram also removed a post by Wokeflix, saying it contained hate speech or symbols.

In one tweet it said, “When was the last time a left wing, anti govt, anti Hindu, anti Modi, #Hinduphobic account was banned @InstagramComms ? The vile abuse and hatred being spread by the above is at all time high and you have a problem with this… #wokeflix #wokeflixandchill #WokeFlixReloaded”.

Last month, Instagram had removed access to link sticker for Wokeflix’s account for allegedly violating its guidelines. A message sent by Instagram had said that Wokeflix will not have access to link sticker because they had shared content that violates Instagram’s Community Guidelines.

Wokeflix however received widespread support on social media for the restoration of its disabled Instagram account.

MTV presenter Suraj Balakrishnan said, “A satire page getting suspended for making people laugh? This is ridiculous. India cannot become another country where a loud woke minority decides what is punishment & what constitutes a ban. Let free speech prevail. Hope this decision is overturned ASAP. @InstagramComms @Meta”

Abhinav Prakash said, “In west wokes are running the corporates these days. We must not allow the same in Indian corporate sector. Minority but loud wokes can’t decide for people. Opposition & punishment for wokeness by any company should be swift and decisive to save our freedom & democratic rights.”

BJP spokesperson Shehzad said, “I am perplexed about this seemingly unfair, arbitrary and unilateral decision that seems aimed at silencing a point of view that is inconvenient to the “pseudo liberal” ecosystem”

BJYM National secretary Tajinder Pal Singh Bagga has said that he has never seen any abusive post from Wokeflix’s Instagram account and asked the Meta (formerly Facebook) owned social media platform to review its decision of disabling the account. He said, “never saw any abusive post on wokeflix account. @instagram should review again.”

Jharkhand: Police sources refute Kashmiri trader’s claim that they were forced to chant Jai Shri Ram, anti-Pakistan slogan in Ranchi, say dispute was over parking

Even though Ranchi police arrested three youths for allegedly assaulting and forcing Kashmiri trader Rizwan Ahmad Wani and others to chant Jai Shri Ram and Pakistan Murdabad, sources in the police said that the allegation made by him is far from reality. Sources in Jharkhand police aware of the matter and investigation so far said that Wani is misusing his Kashmiri identity and playing a victim card.

“Dispute indeed had taken place between Wani and arrested accused. But that was on the issue of wrong parking and driving. He might have been assaulted but it is wrong to say that Kashmiris were forced to chant Jai Shri Ram and Pakistan Murdabad. Using his Kashmiri identity Wani has sensationalised the matter and the rest was done by the media,” police sources not willing to be named told OpIndia.

Police insiders said CCTV footage of the incident is being looked into to establish the truth.

On November 27, Wani lodged an FIR at Doranda police station, claiming that he along with his two Kashmiri friends was on his way to Harmu locality to sell woollen clothes when a group of around 25 people surrounded them at Kadru bridge. Every winter Wani and a large number of Kashmiri traders visit Ranchi and different districts of Jharkhand to sell woollen clothes. They stay for months at rented houses. Wani is a native of Pahalgam in Kashmir.

Wani alleged that these people beat them up and forced them to chant Jai Shri Ram and raise Pakistan Murdabad slogans. He said that someone hit his head with an iron rod. But he survived the attack since he was wearing the helmet. He claimed that his bike was damaged and assailants looted cash, blankets, and documents from him.

On his complaint, police arrested Deepak, Tarun Kumar, and Arvind Kumar and forwarded them to the judicial custody. Wani and his friend who gave an interview to local media claimed that being Kashmiri they are discriminated against and tortured by some people.

Wani belongs to the same group of Kashmiri traders which on November 11 had lodged a similar complaint at Doranda police station. Complainant Bilal Wani and Sabir Batt alleged that they were beaten up and forced to chant Jai Shri Ram and raise anti-Pakistan slogan. In this case, the police arrested one Raj Kishore who is said to be addicted to drug.

Sources said that every year around 400 Kashmiri traders visit Ranchi to earn their livelihood and the majority of them stay in different localities of Doranda having Muslim dominance. “There is no history of even any local Muslim was forced to chant slogan Jai Shri Ram and or to say Pakistan Murdabad. A minor dispute was blown out of proportion,” sources said.

Officials are not willing to speak anything on this matter since Ranchi SSP S.K. Jha has formed a special team on the instruction of chief minister Hemant Soren to investigate both incidents.

 

Ahead of release of Bob Biswas, netizens discover they are mysteriously blocked by actress Chitrangda Singh: Here’s what happened

Actress Chitrangda Singh became the subject of much discussion on social media ahead of the release of her movie Bob Biswas after multiple users discovered that they had been blocked by the actress on Twitter. The actress, a heartthrob to many, has a great many fans on the platform, who were disheartened to learn that they had been blocked by the Twitter account of the actress.

A lot of them shared screenshots showing that they had been blocked by Chitrangda Singh.

People who claim to have never interacted with the actress were blocked as well.

Others observed that most people who had been blocked belonged to a particular political bent.

There were many many people who have been blocked by Chitrangda Singh on Twitter.

People were left perplexed as to why a celebrity they had never interacted with had blocked them on social media. Spokesperson for BJP Delhi Tajinder Pal Singh Bagga, who had been blocked by the actress as well, finally provided an explanation for the chain of events.

Bagga said that he received a call from her manager and was informed that her former social media agency had blocked everyone on Twitter and they were working to resolve the matter soon. Apparently, the manager called him after seeing his tweet showing that he has also been blocked by the actress.

It remains to be seen how that turns out. Meanwhile, Bob Biswas is set to release on the 3rd of December and features Abhishek Bachchan and Chitrangda Singh in the lead.

Security stepped in Mathura as Hindu outfit announces they will install the idol of Lord Krishna at Shahi Eidgah mosque on December 6

0

Security has been tightened and prohibitory order under section 144 imposed in Mathura following the announcement of the Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha (ABHM) to install the idol of Lord Krishna at a site within the Shahi Eidgah on December 6.

SSP of Mathura Gaurav Grover said that actions would be taken against people involved in spreading rumour and vitiating the atmosphere of Mathura. He said that the administration got information about that some organisations have announced to hold a foot march and a programme at Eidgah site. Police said that no permission was granted to any outfit for any programme.

On November 16, Rajyashree Choudhary, the national president of Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha had announced details of the programme at a press conference in Mathura. Rajyashree Choudhary informed that ABHM has decided to install the idol of Bal Gopal (child Krishna) followed by Jalabhishek at Shahi Idgah, which is considered to be the birthplace of Lord Krishna.

Rajyashree Choudhary is the grand-niece of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose. The date selected for this programme coincides with an important incident in India as on this day the Babri structure was demolished in Ayodhya in 1992.

Rajyashree said that people wish to construct a small temple for Bal Gopal here. She claimed that the proposed site is the birthplace of Lord Krishna hence nobody can stop Hindus from visiting this place. She said that ABHM gave prior information to the home ministry about the proposed programme. For Jalabhishek, water will be fetched from different rivers across the country.

Even if Mathura DC Navneet Singh Chahal and SSP have warned strict action against individuals and organisations trying to create any disturbance and appealing people to stay away from such programme, peaceful processions were taken out.

Members of ABHM besides local residents organized amantran yatra in Agra to invite people to participate in December 6 programme. The march started from the Rawali Mahadeo temple. However, local administration initially tried to stop them.

In Lucknow, the administration is said to have placed Manish Yadav under detention. He is the national president of Narayani Sena which claims to be among several organisations participating in the Krishna Janmabhoomi movement. Two weeks ago he had announced Karseva in Mathura.

Mathura temple case

In January 1670, fanatic Mughal ruler Aurangzeb had plundered Mathura. He had destroyed the famous Keshava Rai temple and built a mosque there. According to the legends, this was the birthplace of Lord Krishna.

The history of the temple complex can be traced back to 1618. Raja Veer Singh Deva Bundela of Orchha had built a grand temple of Lord Shri Krishna which Aurangzeb demolished and built a mosque here. After Marathas came to power in 1770, the temple was restored, but the Eidgah mosque remained in its place.

Later on, the East India Company auctioned the land in 1815 which was purchased by Raja Patni Mal of Banaras. In 1944, Rai Kishan Das and Rai Anand Das, the heirs of Raja Patni Mal, executed a sale deed in favour of Mahamana Madan Mohan Malviya, Goswami Ganesh Dutt, and Bhikhen Lalji Aattrey on behalf of Sri Krishna Janambhoomi Trust. Later on, according to an agreement Muslims were allowed to offer namaz during Eid at the Eidgah site which is owned by the Trust.

Last year devotees filed lawsuits before Mathura civil court on behalf of Bhagwan Shri Krishna Virajman to seek removal of the Shahi Eidgah mosque situated adjacent to the temple complex.

The suit claimed ownership of the entire 13.37 acres of land believed to be the birthplace of Lord Sri Krishna. It stated that Lord Shri Krishna had taken birth in the prison of King Kans and the entire area under dispute is known as Katra Keshav Dev. They also demanded the cancellation of the settlement between the Shri Krishna Janmasthan Seva Sansthan (the governing body of the temple complex) and Committee of Management of Trust of Shahi Eidgah (Idgah Trust) held 1968.

Uganda denies reports that China has taken over its only international airport using debt trap, seeks amendment of some loan clauses

On Saturday (November 27), the spokesperson of the Uganda Civil Aviation Authority (UCAA) dismissed media reports, which claimed that China was going to take over the country’s only international airport due to non-payment of a loan taken to expand the airport. Uganda had signed a loan agreement on March 31, 2015, with the Export-Import (Exim) Bank of China for the expansion of the Entebbe International Airport. However, the authorities have admitted that there are problematic clauses in the loan agreement, as Uganda is seeking to amend some clauses in the agreement.

After several media reports across the world, including India, claimed that China has taken over the airport, the Uganda Civil Aviation Authority issued a statement to deny the claim. In a Twitter thread, UCAA spokesperson Vianney M Luggya wrote, “I wish to make it categorically clear that the allegation that Entebbe Airport has been given away for cash is false. The Government of Uganda can’t give away such a national asset. We have said it before and repeat that it has not happened. There isn’t an ounce of truth in it.”

He conceded that UCAA funds are deposited in an escrow account (an asset held by a third party on behalf of two other parties during the transaction process) but clarified that none other than the Ugandan government has control over it.

Vianney M Luggya emphasised, “The Authority enjoys the freedom & liberty of spending what is collected (as per the budget). The lender’s monitoring of the account is only similar to what happens when one gets a salary loan or any other loan, & the bank requests that the salary is channeled through their bank. It does not mean that lending bank takes over your salary.”

He added that the loan, sanctioned to Uganda, by the Export-Import (Exim) Bank of China provided a grace period of 7 years. During the said period, the Ugandan government had to pay only the interest and not the principal amount, According to the UCAA spokesperson, the grace period is not over yet and the government has not defaulted on interest repayment to date. Vianney M Luggya assured that the Entebbe International Airport was in safe hands.

China dismisses reports of debt trap and airport confiscation

Meanwhile, the Chinese government had also rejected reports, that suggested a forcible takeover of Ugandan airport by creating a ‘debt trap.’ While speaking about the matter, China’s Director-General for African Affairs Wu Peng claimed, “Which of the Chinese projects in Africa have been confiscated in Africa? NONE! The hype surrounding the Chinese ‘debt trap’ in Africa have NO factual basis and is being pushed on malicious grounds.” Peng, who serves as China’s Director-General for African Affairs, dismissed such media reports as ‘illogical propaganda.’

Media reports that claimed Uganda’s surrender of international airport to China

On Thursday (November 25), the Daily Monitor published an exclusive story suggesting that the Ugandan government had surrendered the Entebbe International Airport in exchange for Chinese money. It had claimed, “Our investigations over several months show that Uganda dispatched a delegation to Beijing after Exim Bank suspended funding, citing violation of the loan agreement after UCAA failed to implement some of the clauses, which were not favourable to Uganda.”

Screengrab of the news report by Daily Monitor

The Daily Monitor emphasised that attempts at revisioning the Financing Agreement terms with China had failed and how it posed a threat to Uganda’s sovereign assets, given that the government withdrew sovereign immunity on airport assets. “Among the controversial provisions is a surrendering under the airport loan agreement of the approval of UCAA budget, master and strategic plans, which ordinarily are the mandates of the aviation regulator’s board, to Exim Bank in Beijing,” it had claimed.

The Monitor report had said that the loan deal exposes the airport and other government assets to potential attachments and take-over by China upon arbitration awards in Beijing. It had talked about possible take over of the airport by China if the loan is not paid back in time, but had used a misleading headline saying “Uganda surrenders airport for China cash”. This led to other media houses claiming that Uganda has already taken over the airport.

Such distorted reports were published by many other media houses from several countries. Same wrong reports were also published by IANS and Indian media outlets such as WION, India Today and The Economic Times etc.

Uganda seeks amendment in loan clause

Even though both Uganda and China denied reports of China grabbing the airport using a debt trap, there is some truth about concerning clauses in the loan agreement. The original report by Daily Monitor sad that Uganda is seeking to amend the loan agreement it signed with China in 2015 to ensure that the government doesn’t lose control of the nation’s only international airport.

One of the clauses that Uganda wants to amend is the need for the Uganda Civil Aviation Authority to seek approval from the Chinese lender for its budget and strategic plans. The agreement also gives Exim Bank the sole authority to approve withdraws of funds from the UCAA accounts. Another problematic clause is that any dispute between the parties will have to be resolved by the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission.

As many as 13 clauses have been deemed unfriendly to Uganda by people with knowledge about the matter. Apart from having the power to approve annual and monthly operating budgets, which it can reject, the Exim Bank of China also has the right to inspect the government and UCCA books of accounts. 

Did you know Johnny Lever has turned into a Christian preacher? A look at his bizarre claims about Hrithik Roshan and more

0

Johnny Lever is one of the most famous comedians in Indian cinema. The 64-year-old actor has worked in over 200 films. While most people see him as a good entertainer, only a handful know that he has turned into a Christian preacher. Fondly known as ‘Brother Johnny Lever’, the actor was into full-time preaching for over a decade and still attends healing meetings. In some interviews, he claimed to have cured ailments including breast cancer, liver swelling and paralysis, among others.

Johnny Lever: The journey to becoming ‘the miracle healer’

There must be a trigger that turned the comedian into a miracle healer or faith health. For Lever, the time came when his son Jessy Lever got a tumour on his neck. According to his own ‘testimony’, when Jessy was a little boy, he got a tumour on his neck. Lever got him checked at Nanavati hospital, where doctors refused to treat him as the procedure was too complicated and could have resulted in permanent paralysis on one side, loss of vision and other complications.

As Lever saw his son’s condition deteriorating, he took his family on a trip to the US to cheer up his son. Lever said, “This was the time when I became religious. We used to take our son to healing meetings. Those meetings where people claim to heal diseases by praying to Jesus. My wife took my son to many places. For two years, we kept on hearing, ‘Jesus will heal your son.”

During his trip, he visited a church where the Pastor approached him after noticing the tumour on the neck of his son. The Pastor asked him to visit a specific hospital in New York and told him, ‘Jesus will heal your son’, something that he had heard for years. When he reached the hospital, he learnt that the doctor who was supposed to treat him also treated actress Nargis. He claimed that after a recommendation from late actor Sunil Dutt, the doctor operated on his son successfully. After the incident, he became more religious and stopped doing films. His whole concentration was on spreading the “word of God”.

On other occasions, he has claimed that his son suffered from cancer. He has said in the past, “It was God’s will. I had always been a religious person, but one incident changed my life. My son was diagnosed with cancer. I was helpless and turned to God for help. I stopped working in films and spent all my time praying for him. Ten days later, when he was taken for a test, the doctors were surprised because the cancer had vanished. It was the beginning of a new life for me.”

‘I cured Hrithik Roshan’ – claimed Johnny Lever

Lever made numerous claims just like other faith healers like Bajinder Singh, Ankur Narula, Kanchal Mittal, Bakht Singh, PC John, Nirmala Joshi and many others. According to Lever, after starting preaching the word of Jesus across the world, he gained healing powers. Though he did not directly say he has powers, but he did hint towards having supernatural “healing touch”. The most bizarre claim that he has made in several interviews and healing meetings is that he cured the old liver ailment of actor Hrithik Roshan.

A clip is making rounds on social media in which Lever could be seen addressing a large crowd in an event organised by Youth Associate International. It is a missionary organisation based out of Pune that claims to “help people find answer in Jesus”. Interestingly, they have two photographs of former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in their photo gallery on the website. It is unclear if the former PM attended their program or they added his photographs out of context.

Anyway, coming back to Johnny Lever. During his address to the crowd, Lever said, “One day, on a shoot, I saw Rakesh Roshan limping. When I asked him, he said he was feeling as if someone had put 100 KG weight on his shoulders. I asked him if I could pray for him. He agreed. I prayed, and within minutes he was fine.” The crowd applauded. “A few days later, after the release of Hrithik Roshan’s first film, I met Rakesh Roshan and congratulated him for the success of the film. That day, Roshan told me about the liver ailment of Hrithik. He told me he had been suffering for years, but there was no improvement. He asked me if I could pray for Hrithik as I did for him,” Lever added.

Johnny Lever said he was amazed to see Roshan asking for help for Hrithik. He called up Hrithik and “[while gesturing as if he was pointing where the liver is] I asked Hrithik you are not well? Now you will be fine. ‘Jesus heal him’, I prayed, and till date, he did not have to take any medicine for his swollen liver.” Interestingly, Lever has been making such claims for years now, but no one from the Roshan family had denied it. Such claims not only make people believe in so-called ‘Change meetings’ or ‘Healing meetings’ but also give a boost to frauds like Bajinder Singh and Ankur Narula, who lure naïve people to convert to Christianity on the pretext of ‘miracle treatment’.

During the same address, Lever claimed to have cured the stone of many workers on the set of a film. He said, “A man came to meet me while I was reading Bible in my van. When I asked him to sit, he sat with great difficulty. When I questioned him, he told me he had stone. I prayed to him ‘In the name of Jesus’ and asked him after two minutes. He was cured.” Lever further alleged that when he came outside, there was a long line of people with a similar health problem. “I worked on the set for ten days and cured all of them by the end of the shoot,” Lever alleged.

In another claim, Johnny Lever alleged he cured Mitali Singh’s (Ghazal singer) breast cancer who lived in his building. He said, “I met Mitali, who lived in my building. She told me she was diagnosed with breast cancer. I was shocked and felt petty for her. We struggled together. While I was talking to her, I heard a voice in my head ‘her cancer is cured’. I told her the same. She showed me a report and said two more reports are awaited that would take a week. Later she showed me reports that the cancer was still there. I told her to get checked again. She was cured. Now she has two reports, one with cancer and one without cancer.” Lever made this claim during an interview with actor Anupam Kher.

In the same interview, he alleged that he cured the paralysis of the driver of actor Asrani. He said, “One day I was reading Bible when Asrani’s driver came to meet me. He told me he had a paralysis attack and was on bed rest for months. I touched the hand that was supposed to be paralysed, and suddenly it started moving.”

Doctors cured his son, but he cured people with a ‘miracle touch’

There is a saying, “God help those who try”. Johnny Lever’s son was saved by the doctors. One may believe that God showed him the path. There is nothing wrong with having faith, no matter which religion you follow. However, it is farfetched, misleading and highly problematic to say that Johnny Lever gained supernatural powers that enabled him to cure stone, lever swelling and cancer, among other health problems.

While doctors with years of experience cured Jessy Lever, his father travelled around the world alleging Jesus cured his son and claimed to have cured different health problems by just praying and touching the patients. As a preacher, Lever follows the path of the “miracle healers” that have been converting naïve people across India, promising them to heal them. Hrithik Roshan never called out his bluffs, and he may never do so.

Watch: Chinese soldiers turn Tiktokiya at high altitude, govt propagandist shares ‘cool’ and ‘cute’ dancing video

0

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying in a bid to motivate the Chinese Army has shared a video of Chinese soldiers dancing at high altitude during break time. She has called the video ‘cool’ and ‘cute’.

The Chinese soldiers in the video could be seen performing dance steps in a snowy background supposed to be at an altitude of 5200 metres.

People on Twitter had a lot to say about the Tiktok-like video shared by the spokesperson. One user said the video explains why the Chinese avoids direct warfare.

Asia Correspondent for The Telegraph, Nicola Smith, saw the funny side of it.

Another user remarked on the staged nature of the whole charade.

There were others who said that the video and the caption to it looked like a meme.

One user asked if they were soldiers or school kids.

Another user advised them to make TikTok videos.

Earlier this year, Hua Chunying had mentioned that the Communist Party of China should be awarded “gold medals and medals” for its contribution to human rights. She said, “It can be said that the #CPC is not only blameless on #humanrights issues, but it should also be awarded gold medals and medals.”. Chunying’s tweet came at a time when Muslim Uyghurs in Xinjiang were locked up for ‘reeducation’ and the growing global concern regarding the suppression of human rights in China.

Recently, Chinese state affiliated mediaperson Shen Shiwei had mocked Abhinandan Varthaman, hero of the February 2019 Balakot air strikes that destroyed terrorist camps by sharing an image of the then Wing Commander Abhinandan Varthaman in captivity of Pakistani soldiers. Indian Air Force fighter pilot Abhinandan Varthaman was awarded the Vir Chakra by President of India for his heroics during 2019 Balakot Air Strikes when he was the Wing Commander.

Unemployed youths of Rajasthan reach Lucknow to protest against the Ashok Gehlot government before Priyanka Gandhi Vadra

After a month-long protest in Jaipur against the Ashok Gehlot led Congress government, the unemployed youth of Rajasthan have reached Lucknow and staged a protest outside the Congress party office demanding justice from Priyanka Gandhi Vadra. The unemployed youth under the leadership of Upen Yadav have put forth their demands before the Congress party and said that their agitation will continue until the Rajasthan government fulfilled their demands.

As per reports, the unemployed youth from Rajasthan reached Lucknow to meet Priyanka Gandhi Vadra regarding the failure of the Rajasthan government to address important issues related to employment. Reportedly, the unemployed youth were pushed around by the Congress workers near the Congress office in Lucknow and left the place after they were given assurances from Priyanka Gandhi Vadra and Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot.

State president of Rajasthan Unemployment Unified Federation Upen Yadav said, ‘Our agitation will continue till our demands are not met.’

The youths spent the Saturday winter night in the open, which reportedly made some of them ill. They have been agitating for 46 days for various demands, including conducting a CBI inquiry into the teacher recruitment examination, conducting recruitment examinations regularly etc.

Notably, earlier in September, hundreds of unemployed youths had marched towards the Rajasthan Assembly in order to submit their demands before the Rajasthan government. The youths were later stopped by the Rajasthan police and then protested by shouting slogans. Student leader Ravindra Singh Bhati had said, “More than 15 lakh unemployed youth are registered in Rajasthan out of which 12.24 lakh are postgraduates. But out of these, only 1.60 lakh are getting unemployment allowance.” He further added, “in Rajasthan also 75% reservation should be given to the youth of Rajasthan in jobs on the lines of Haryana. So that the youth of Rajasthan can get employment in time as people from other states are coming to Rajasthan and taking jobs due to which the youth here are not getting jobs.”

According to reports, the main demands of the unemployed youth include the appointment of deprived candidates of Nursing Recruitment 2013, the release of the Laboratory Assistant Recruitment 2018 Selection List of Medical Department, removal of 5000 posts of special teachers from Reet Teacher Recruitment 2021, an increase of REIT teacher recruitment from 31000 to 50000 in 2021, etc.

In July 2021, several computer graduates from Rajasthan had protested outside Priyanka Vadra’s office demanding regular jobs, and they were thrashed by Congress workers.

PM Modi lauds Ayushman Bharat scheme in Mann Ki Baat, beneficiaries say ‘did not spend a single rupee on treatment’

On November 28, in his monthly Mann Ki Baat radio address, Prime Minister Narendra Modi talked about the Ayushman Bharat scheme. He talked about the benefits that the Ayushman Card beneficiaries are getting under the scheme and had a conversation with two beneficiaries. He said, “Our health is the biggest happiness in our lives, that everyone should get this cheerful life is the essence of Ayushman Bharat.”

Got treatment and medicines with Ayushman card – Rajesh Kumar Prajapati

PM Modi talked to two beneficiaries of the Ayushman card. The first beneficiary was Rajesh Kumar Prajapati, who was suffering from a heart ailment. During the conversation, Prajapati told the initially doctors thought he had an acidity problem and gave medicine for the same. However, when he did not get better, the local doctor referred him to a specialist Dr Amresh Agarwal who did angiography and informed him that he had a blockage.

Prajapati told PM Modi that because of the Ayushman card, his treatment and medicines were free, and he did not have to spend a single rupee on the treatment. He said, “Sir and this card that you have made in a very good way and for us poor people is very convenient. And how can I thank you!” 49-year-old Prajapati works at a private firm. He had been suffering from a heart problem for a long time.

While telling PM how he got treatment for free, Prajapati said, “All my treatment was done with the same card, not a single penny of mine was spent, all the medicines have also been issued through the same card.” PM Modi encouraged him to tell the low-income families around him to tell about the benefits of the scheme.

Knee surgery under the Ayushman Bharat scheme saved around three lakhs

The second beneficiary PM Modi talked to was Sukhdevi from Danadpara, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh. She informed PM Modi that she got treatment under the Ayushman Bharat scheme for her damaged knee from Prayag Hospital. 40-year-old Sukhdevi has been suffering from arthritis since she was only 16 years old. Initially, she got treatment from quacks resulting in further damage to the knee.

She told PM Modi if there was no scheme for the treatment, she had to spend around Rs. 3 lakh on the surgery. She said, “I have been on the cot for 6-7 years. I was praying to God to call me as I did not want to live. The doctor had told it would cost 2.5 to 3 lakh rupees for the treatment. My husband came to know about the scheme during a meeting at the school. It was because of the Ayushman card that I got my treatment for free.”

She thanked PM Modi and said, “Thank you very much! Because of your scheme, I got cured, I got back on my feet.”

Ayushman Bharat Card

Ayushman Card is issued to the beneficiaries under Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (AB-PMJAY), which is a flagship health protection scheme of the Government of India that provides a cover of up to Rs. 5 lakhs per family per year. It is currently available for poor and vulnerable families covering around 53 crore beneficiaries. It provides cashless and paperless access to services for the beneficiaries at the point of care. Launched on September 23, 2018, over 16.7 crore cards have been issued nationwide, and over 2.27 crore hospital admissions have been reported under the scheme so far.

‘Critics are not trolls, milord’: ‘Faceless and nameless’ troll writes open letter to Chief Justice of India

Dear Chief Justice of India,

On behalf of all faceless nameless social media trolls, I am writing this letter. Before I start ranting, please let me explain what trolls mean and why they choose to remain faceless and nameless. Trolls are the ones who criticise powerful people, politicians, law makers, bureaucrats, journalist celebrities, intellectuals, civil society, businessmen, Judiciary and Courts too.

So, you must be thinking why are we called trolls not critics? Because we criticise people who don’t like to be criticised. For example, elite journalists, if we question them, they will see it as an attack on journalism, they themselves want power to question everyone but they don’t like to be questioned back because they are sitting on their self-assumed pedestal of being the 4th pillar of Democracy. So they started calling us troll and once they started naming social media critics as troll, all others joined them in calling us troll. We kind of like this name so we are happily accepting it.

Why do we choose to be nameless and faceless? Nothing is hidden from you milord, you are very well aware how powerful people react when you take them to the place they are not comfortable in and expose them. They can go after our jobs, our family and sometime, send goons to beat us up. And there is also a benefit of being nameless and faceless that powerful people will have to reply on topic only and they can’t use religion, caste or race to divert the topic.

Who are abusive trolls? Trolls mostly use humour, sarcasm, satire or meme to criticise but it is backed with facts not abuses. Anyone, including me, using abuses is giving bad name to trolls and must avoid it and it also makes it easy for powerful people to take action. Not only trolls but anyone who is abusing should be dealt with laws, be it a Rajya Sabha MP calling an actress ‘haramkhor’ or an actor abusing journalist. But such abusive ‘trolls’ are few in number.

Milord, coming to the point, recently you asked central agencies to take action against trolls who are questioning judges on social media. Had this statement come from any politician or journalist, we would have seen as badge of honour but this statement coming from lordship has hurt us badly. We look upon you as our chief defender of freedom of expression. To paraphrase Justice Gautam Patel, ‘there is no such things as too much dissent’. Justice Chandrachud advices us to ‘stand up and be dissenters’. And while protecting rights of dissenters, Delhi Court said ‘if you don’t agree with the author, don’t read the book’. There are thousands of instances when Judiciary stood up for dissenters and freedom of expression.

As I had mentioned earlier, we are called trolls by people who don’t like to be criticised, with due respect to your chair, judiciary has joined that league when you asked central agencies to take action against social media trolls. We are taught that everyone has right to criticise anyone and no one is above law, even the law makers and law implementer. It should not be a crime to criticise any court order or any judge at his/her personal capacity. People should be bound to follow court order no matter if they like it or not, but criticising that order should not be crime.

Coming to attack on the judiciary, It’s not trolls who are hurting judiciary, its news publishers and media who portray court order as per their wish. They can turn a court order towards any direction as per their need. They use oral remarks of judges as headlines of article, which might be completely different from the order of that case. Nothing is harming judiciary more than fake news. And I am really sorry to say this but courts always protect those fake news peddlers in the name of freedom of press and dissent. Instead of going after trolls, milords should have asked law makers to frame laws against fake news peddlers. I am not against freedom of press, but freedom comes with a price and here that price is one and only TRUTH. Freedom of press must not be confused with freedom to lie.

Milord, I am too young to tell this, but in my opinion, serving judges should refrain for putting their opinion and off-the-cuff remarks, as suggested by supreme court. Once a judge has an opinion, his/her chances of being unbiased gets reduced and it can also influence the decision. Judges are supposed to be unbiased and no opinion is unbiased.

Concluding this letter with an expectation that courts will protect freedom of expression of trolls who are already targeted by many powerful chairs. And in future, if anyone will attack on freedom of expression of trolls, courts will take Suo moto to defend trolls and idea of India.

If you find this letter offensive, please accept my apologies. I am now off to the nearest communal mandir to pray that I get away with just one rupee fine like Prashant Bhushan, who attacked the judiciary far more uncharitably than any of us trolls do.

Yours obediently,
Nameless, faceless but not shameless troll.