Home Blog Page 390

Kerala Government declares three-day mourning following the death of Pope Francis

The Kerala Government has announced a three-day state mourning on the passing away of Pope Francis.

A two-day state mourning will be observed on April 22 and April 23. Additionally, a one-day state mourning will be observed on the day of the funeral, which will be communicated separately.

The National flag will be flown at half mast, where it is regularly flown and there will be no official entertainment during the period of the state mourning.

Additionally, district collectors have also been requested to inform the concerned officers within their jurisdiction, where the national flag is regularly flown, about the state mourning and to fly the national flag on half-mast.

In a post on X earlier, Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan described the Pope as “a beacon of compassion who stood with the poor and marginalised, took a critical stance against global capitalism, and championed interfaith dialogue.”

“Pope Francis’ legacy will inspire generations striving for justice and equality,” the Chief Minister said.

Meanwhile, the entire country has also declared a three-day mourning as a mark of request, according to an official notification issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA).

The mourning will be observed across the country on April 22 and 23, and again on the day of the Pope’s funeral.

Pope Francis (88) passed away at his residence, Casa Santa Marta, in the Vatican on April 21.

The Home Ministry stated: “Three-Day State Mourning as a mark of respect on the passing away of His Holiness Pope Francis, Supreme Pontiff of the Holy See.”

“His Holiness Pope Francis, Supreme Pontiff of the Holy See, passed away today, the 21st April, 2025. As a mark of respect, three-day State Mourning shall be observed throughout India, in the following manner: Two days’ State Mourning on Tuesday, the 22nd April, 2025 and Wednesday, the 23rd April, 2025. One day’s State Mourning on the day of the funeral,” the statement added.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi had expressed deep sorrow over the Pope’s death. He said Pope Francis’ “affection for the people of India will always be cherished.”

“Deeply pained by the passing of His Holiness Pope Francis. In this hour of grief and remembrance, my heartfelt condolences to the global Catholic community. Pope Francis will always be remembered as a beacon of compassion, humility and spiritual courage by millions across the world. From a young age, he devoted himself towards realising the ideals of Lord Christ. He diligently served the poor and downtrodden. For those who were suffering, he ignited a spirit of hope,” PM Modi said on X.

(This news report is published from a syndicated feed. Except for the headline, the content has not been written or edited by OpIndia staff)

PM Modi, US Vice President Vance welcome “significant progress” in negotiations for India-US Bilateral Trade Agreement

0

Prime Minister Narendra Modi met US Vice President JD Vance on Monday and welcomed the “significant progress” in the negotiations for a mutually beneficial India-US Bilateral Trade Agreement focused on the welfare of the people of the two countries.

They also noted continued efforts to enhance cooperation in energy, defence, strategic technologies, and other areas.

The two leaders also exchanged views on various regional and global issues of mutual interest, and called for dialogue and diplomacy as the way forward.

Vice President Vance was accompanied by the Second Lady Usha Vance, their children, and senior members of the US Administration.

“Prime Minister fondly recalled his visit to Washington DC in January and his fruitful discussions with President Trump, which laid down the roadmap for close cooperation between India and the US, leveraging the strengths of Make America Great Again (MAGA) and Viksit Bharat 2047,” the release said.

Prime Minister and Vice President Vance reviewed and positively assessed the progress in various areas of bilateral cooperation.

“They welcomed the significant progress in the negotiations for a mutually beneficial India-U.S. Bilateral Trade Agreement focused on the welfare of the people of the two countries. Likewise, they noted continued efforts towards enhancing cooperation in energy, defence, strategic technologies and other areas. The two leaders also exchanged views on various regional and global issues of mutual interest, and called for dialogue and diplomacy as the way forward,” the release said.

The Prime Minister extended his best wishes to the Vice President, the Second Lady, and their children for a pleasant and productive stay in India.

He also conveyed his warm greetings to President Trump and said that he looked forward to his visit to India later this year.

The US Vice President, who is on a four-day official visit to India, arrived in the national capital on Monday.

This is Vice President Vance’s first visit to India. He will also visit Jaipur and Agra before departing for Washington DC.

The high-level visit comes amid trade negotiations between the two countries following the US decision to impose reciprocal tariffs on several countries, including India.

The US has reduced new tariff rates on most of its trade partners to 10 per cent for 90 days to allow trade negotiations.

(This news report is published from a syndicated feed. Except for the headline, the content has not been written or edited by OpIndia staff)

PM Modi welcomes US Vice President JD Vance and his family at his residence, gives special gifts to Vance children: Watch

Prime Minister Narendra Modi warmly welcomed U.S. Vice President JD Vance, his wife Usha Vance, and their children—Ewan, Vivek, and Mirabel—on Monday.

Upon arriving at Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s residence at 7, Lok Kalyan Marg in New Delhi, U.S. Vice President JD Vance and his family were warmly received. PM Modi greeted Vice President Vance with an embrace and engaged in conversation with Usha Vance.

A video shared from the visit shows the Prime Minister playfully interacting with the Vance children, Ewan and Vivek, who are seen sitting on his lap and chatting with him. Modi is also seen giving the family a tour of his residence.

Later, the Prime Minister gifted each of the Vance children—Ewan, Vivek, and Mirabel—a peacock feather as a token of his affection.

Earlier in the day, the Vance family visited the Swaminarayan Akshardham Temple in Delhi, where the children were dressed in traditional Indian attire. Ewan and Vivek wore kurta-pyjamas, while Mirabel donned an Anarkali outfit with an embroidered jacket.

Vice President Vance expressed gratitude on social media following the temple visit, saying, “Thank you all so much for your hospitality and kindness in welcoming me and my family to this beautiful place… Our kids, in particular, loved it. God bless.”

The family also visited the Central Cottage Industries Emporium at Janpath.

Following their interactions, PM Modi and Vice President Vance held bilateral discussions, and the Prime Minister is expected to host a dinner for the Vance family later.

During his four-day trip to India, JD Vance is scheduled to visit Delhi, Jaipur, and Agra—Jaipur on Tuesday and Agra on Wednesday. The visit is viewed as a significant effort to enhance the India-U.S. Comprehensive Global Strategic Partnership. According to MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal, the visit will address all major areas of cooperation and aims to further solidify bilateral ties.

6 years of Easter bombings in Sri Lanka by ISIS terrorists: Then and now, how the island nation has been handling Islamic terrorism

On this day six years ago, in 2019, Sri Lanka experienced devastating serial bombings on Easter Sunday. Coordinated suicide bombings linked to Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) or Islamic State (IS) targeted three churches and three luxury hotels in Colombo, the nation’s capital. Additionally, two smaller blasts occurred later that day at a housing complex in Dematagoda and in a guest house in Dehiwala.

The terrorist attacks resulted in the deaths of 279 individuals, including 11 Indians, and at least 45 foreign nationals, three police officers and eight suicide bombers, with around 500 others sustaining injuries. The church bombings took place during Easter services in Negombo, Batticaloa, and Colombo while the affected hotels included the Shangri-La, Cinnamon Grand, Kingsbury and Tropical Inn. The State Intelligence Service (SIS) reported that a second wave of attacks was planned but was thwarted by government raids.

Officials from the Sri Lankan government stated that the suicide bombers involved in the attacks were all Sri Lankan nationals affiliated with the National Thowheeth Jamaath (NTJ), a local terrorist group suspected of having international connections and known for its attacks on Buddhists and Sufis.

“Preliminary investigation revealed that what happened in Sri Lanka was in retaliation for the attack against Muslims in Christchurch,” former State Defence Minister Ruwan Wijewardene disclosed. The attack on two mosques in Christchurch by accused gunman Brenton Tarrant claimed the lives of around 50 people and injured many others. The Indian High Commission was a possible target of the bombings, based on Sri Lankan Parliament Committee’s report.

On 23rd April 2019, the Amaq News Agency, which serves as a propaganda platform for the Islamic State, announced that “the perpetrators of the attack targeting the citizens of coalition countries and Christians in Sri Lanka were Islamic State fighters.” Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the slain leader of IS lauded the attackers in an 18-minute video covering various subjects. The outfit claimed responsibility and released video of suicide bombers pledging allegiance to the group.

Ten years of peace on the island nation were upended by the assault which once more highlighted the deeper issues in the country’s politics and society. They served as a sobering reminder of the country’s brutal past, which included a 25-year civil war that claimed over 70,000 lives before Sri Lankan forces prevailed over LTTE in 2009.

It is evident that the primary target of the attack was Sri Lanka’s Christian minority which makes up fewer than 10% of the country’s 22 million inhabitants. Notably, Sri Lanka did not participate in the anti-ISIS coalition, however, the majority of those who died in the bombings were citizens of the country.

Major intelligence failure

What stood out most about these attacks was the clear intelligence failure to act on early warnings. The security agencies were alerted to a Islamist group’s intentions to carry out suicide attacks on churches, ten days before the bombings, but no subsequent action was taken. These warnings were reiterated just a day before the attacks with India involved in the intelligence exchange. This reflected a tactical shortcoming, as the country’s institutional framework was found lacking during such a serious crisis.

Several recordings of Zahran Hashim, one of the suicide bombers were obtained by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) from the electronic devices of the seven ISIS terrorists who were nabbed in Coimbatore in September of 2018. The agnecy executed raids in multiple locations in connection with a plot by to assassinate leaders of Hindu outfits by ISIS-inspired terrorists.

Hashim was accused of radicalizing these individuals while he was in India. They had planned to murder many Hindu leaders, including Mookambikai Mani, the leader of the Hindu Munnani and Arjun Sampath, the chief of the Hindu Makkal Katchi.

Investigators concluded that he was preparing “something big” in Sri Lanka after the Indian authorities recognized him as the head of the National Thowheed Jamaath based on the footage. On 4th April, Indian authorities warned their Sri Lankan colleagues about potential assaults based on the intelligence provided by the NIA. According to Indian investigators, Hashim traveled to Coimbatore, Tiruchirappalli, Tirunelveli, Vellore and Nagapattinam in Tamil Nadu as well as Malappuram in Kerala.

He was accused of being involved in a smuggling operation between Kalpitiya on the northwest coast of Sri Lanka and Ramanathapuram on the eastern coast of India. He was the leader of the National Thowheeth Jamaath which claimed responsibility for the attack in Sri Lanka. He was initially recognized by security personnel in the video that Islamic State shared to take responsibility of the bombings. He was observed leading seven individuals in swearing loyalty to the IS chief.

When it was discovered that the authorities had not properly disseminated the Indian intelligence warning about planned assaults from the beginning of the month, the government acknowledged a “major intelligence lapse.” Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe emphasized that neither he nor his cabinet members had received any notification regarding the warning.

It highlighted the power struggle between him and President Maithripala Sirisena who was also the defense minister and oversaw the nation’s intelligence agencies, culminating in a brutal attack on their country. Furthermore, there was a significant strategic failure in tracking the progression of NTJ from a fringe entity to a major threat.

Aftermath of the attack

The Sri Lankan government was driven to implement a series of measures aimed at projecting a sense of order, in the wake of these attacks. The president appointed a 3-member panel to investigate the bombings while also empowering the police and security forces with greater authority to capture and interrogate suspects. Additionally, the government temporarily blocked access to social media platforms including Facebook and Instagram.

A curfew was enforced, the NTJ was banned and numerous arrests were made. Ministers claimed that although security services had been keeping an eye on the NTJ, neither the prime minister nor the cabinet had received an alert. Maithripala Sirisena moved to fire the inspector general of police and the defense secretary.

A four-month state of emergency was proclaimed by the Sri Lankan government, giving the military broad authority to search, detain and arrest anyone in accordance with the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA). Over 2,000 Muslims were held by the authorities. Arrest warrants were based on the possession of Islamic literature, specific attire or dubious affiliations. Many people were held in custody for years.

Over the next few weeks, communal violence escalated, fueled by calls to boycott businesses, stores, and services linked to a particular community. The administration of President Sirisena enacted a prohibition on the niqab, citing concerns for national security. Although this ban was lifted in August 2019, it was succeeded by other rules, such as dress-code rules for Muslim women teachers, particularly in the Eastern Province. These regulations were later withdrawn due to pushback and the intervention of the nation’s Human Rights Commission.

Four Muslim ministers resigned but they later returned to their positions after inquiries failed to find any evidence of their suspected link with Islamist organization. Nine government lawmakers, including six cabinet ministers, stepped down in early June after a Buddhist politician accused them of having ties to terrorism and requested their dismissal.

On the other hand, two Muslim Provincial Governors resigned in Kandy following protests by thousands, which included monks from the predominantly Buddhist community. A monk even initiated a hunger strike outside Sri Dalada Malingawa, the holiest Buddhist site in Sri Lanka, demanding the removal of three Muslim politicians, citing their involvement in the bombings.

Many prominent Muslims including lawyers and poets were arrested in relation to the bombings. A parliamentary sectoral oversight committee on national security was established to draft recommendations for counterterrorism measures. The committee issued suggestions in 14 areas that Muslims believed restrict their religious freedom.

Gotabaya Rajapaksa declared his intention to rid the country of what he described as new religious extremist threats when he ran for president in 2019. His efforts were successful, as he received resounding support from Sinhala voters, including a large number of Catholics who had not previously supported him. After taking office, his administration increased monitoring on Muslims for pandemic response or national security purposes. The government outlawed the burial of those who were believed to have died from COVID-19 on 1st April 2020. The policy remained in effect for months.

Sri Lanka’s public security minister, Sarath Weerasekara, declared that the government would shut down more than 1,000 unregistered Islamic schools nationwide and outlaw the burqa, on 13th March 2021. According to him, “the burqa” had a “direct impact on national security” and was a “sign of religious extremism.”  He pointed out, “Nobody can open a school and teach whatever you want to the children. It must be as per the government laid down education policy.” He insisted that it was “bad for the students” if unregulated madrassas only taught the Quran and Arabic.

Human rights organizations and the United Nations special rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief made several declarations in response to the widely reported development. The administration withdrew the remark three days later as Keheliya Rambukwella, the cabinet spokesperson conveyed that a consultative procedure and time are needed to make the decision.

The administration declared that approval from the defense ministry would be required for all imported Islamic books, in 2021. It gazetted a set of regulations under the Prevention of Terrorism Act, a few days later. The subheading displayed, “Deradicalization from holding violent extremist religious ideology.” The rules allowed the authorities to detain people on suspicion and send them to a rehabilitation facility where they could be “deradicalized” for a year without the requirement to adhere to further procedures.

Seventy Muslim women and girls in Trincomalee had their A-Level test results withheld by the Department of Examination in early 2024 because they were wearing white shawls, which were against dress norms. The government eventually labeled their clothing as hijabs and was charged with jeopardizing their ability to pursue further education after examiners allegedly allowed them to take the tests.

Sainthood and a fresh probe

On its fifth anniversary last year, the Catholic church in Sri Lanka made the decision to declare all those slain in the 2019 Easter Sunday suicide attacks saints. The announcement was made by Cardinal Malcolm Ranjith, the Archbishop of Colombo, at a service.

“A person can be named a saint only after the completion of 5 years since one’s sacrifice. Therefore, we will move towards declaring Easter Sunday victims as saints on April 21 this year. Those who died in churches in April 2019 sacrificed their lives for what they believed in. They came to church because they believed in Christ,” Malcolm Ranjith expressed. 167 victims were recognized as “heroes (or witnesses) of faith” by the Vatican on 21st April 2025.

He made the announcement during a celebration commemorating the sixth anniversary of the suicide attacks. The statement was delivered at a vigil held at Colombo’s Saint Anthony’s Church, which was targeted in the coordinated explosions.

He had been fighting the government for justice for the victims for the past five years. He denounced every probe as a political cover-up and a hoax. He called for an international probe into the assault. However, according to the administration, hundreds of people had been arrested and the legal process is ongoing.

He had been fighting the government for justice for the victims for the past five years. He denounced every probe as a political cover-up and a hoax. He called for an international probe into the assault. However, according to the administration, hundreds of people had been arrested and the legal process is ongoing.

Foreign Minister Vijitha Herath mentioned, “There have been several commissions of inquiry, but some evidence was suppressed. We want to find out why there were irregularities in the previous investigations, take a fresh look at the incident, expose the culprits, and bring them to justice.”

Meanwhile, Sri Lanka’s top espionage agency was returned to police control after almost five years when President Anura Kumara Dissanayake fired Suresh Sallay, the intelligence chief. The latter was connected to the bombers and had met with them before the attack, according to a report by British channel Channel 4 last year. The network was informed by a whistleblower that he had allowed the attack in an attempt to sway the presidential election that year.

A longtime insider in the Rajapaksa inner circle, Hanzeer Azad Maulana, claimed to have arranged a meeting between military intelligence chief Suresh Sallay and NTJ members in 2018. He stated that the latter informed him that in order to restore the Rajapaksa family to power, there needed to be national insecurity. Sallay, however, denied any role in the bombings.

The critical Buddhist-Muslim dynamics

Relations between the Sinhala Buddhist majority, which comprises around 70% of the population, and the Hindu and Christian Tamil minority, consists of approximately 12%, have been turbulent since Sri Lanka’s independence from the British in 1948. Buddhist nationalists have recently engaged in conflict with Muslims after encountering the chaos of Tamil separatism. Following riots in 2014 and ongoing attacks on mosques and Muslim-owned businesses, sectarian conflict has escalated in Sri Lanka in past few years.

An anti-Muslim movement led by the monk Galabod Aththe Gnanasara and started by the Bodu Bala Sena (BBS) emerged following the end of the civil war in 2009. The BBS is an activist organization run by Buddhist monks that organized on the idea that “social separatism” of ‘extremist Muslims” constituted a threat. The BBS succeeded in abolishing the nation’s halal certification system during this time. Similar to Burmese buddhist monk and leader of 969 Movement, Wirathu, Gnanasara stated that Muslim invaders are destroying Buddhist heritage sites and outlined that his battle is against Islamic radicalization.

Myanmar’s 969 Movement (nationalist movement opposed to Islam’s expansion in the predominantly Buddhist country) and the BBS made a deal in 2014 at a summit in Colombo as part of a Buddhist and international anti-Islamist campaign. Some Buddhists have been taking a coordinated counter-approach to the rise of Islamic extremism in their nations.

Traces of ISIS from Sri Lanka to India

Four Sri Lankans were apprehended by the Gujarat Anti-Terrorist Squad (ATS) on 20th May 2024 at Ahmedabad’s Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport on suspicion of being ISIS terrorists. According to Indian media, the four men were corresponding with “Abu,” a Pakistani ISIS handler. Three loaded pistols and an ISIS flag were seized by the authorities from them. They sough to attack Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) leaders including Nupur Sharma, Rajah Singh, and Updesh Rana for alleged “atrocities against Muslims.”

Mohammed Rasdin (43), Mohammed Faris (35), Mohammed Nafran (27) and Mohammed Nusrath Gani (33) were formerly part of the National Thowheeth Jamaath. According to the them, they were paid 400,000 Sri Lankan rupees, or around $1,400, to carry out the attacks. All four had criminal histories, according to Sri Lankan authorities. Nafran is the son of Niyas Naufer, also known as Potta Naufer, an infamous underground crime lord who was given the death penalty for the 2004 murder of High Court Judge Sarath Ambepitiya.

“Abu gave Rs 4 lakh in Sri Lankan currency to the four suspects to carry out terror activities. He had sent them photos of weapons, its location including geo coordinates through proton drive and proton mail and list of targets. Following the information, the ATS officials claimed to have found three pistols from a pink colour parcel and a black flag from a location in Nana Chioda area. The pistols bear star marks but their serial numbers have been deliberately removed so that its origin can’t be traced,” the authorities informed.

The arrests have, predictably, rekindled worries about Islamic radicalism in Sri Lanka and its affect in India. The repercussions of the spillover may lead India to revisit the era of the LTTE (Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam), which was responsible for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi in 1991. This incident, executed by a suicide bomber, represented a significant threat to India’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, as the group’s violent and disruptive actions were viewed as harmful to the nation’s security.

Zahran Hashim, the mastermind behind the Easter attacks, reportedly traveled to India and communicated with Indians on social media. Several self-styled pro-ISIS groups have subsequently been busted by Indian security officials, particularly in the southern region of the nation. India has also evacuated people from Gulf states who have supported ISIS and engaged in other terrorist activities over the years.

ISIS presence in South Asia

The bombings in Sri Lanka, marked a new strategy for ISIS in South Asia, which consists of three components: ISIS operating on the ground in the region through provinces like ISIS-KP (Khorasan Province), regional terrorist outfits inspired by ISIS’s ideology and carrying out attacks in its name and South Asian citizens returning to the region after joining the group in Syria.

It is estimated that 41 Sri Lankan nationals traveled to Syria to join ISIS despite the government’s prior denials to the contrary. The arrest of more than 90 people in relation to the Easter bombings revealed a wide-ranging network of people who shared NTJ and JMI’s (Jamathei Millathu Ibrahim) viewpoints. The story is much the same in India. The first known instances of Indian nationals trying to join ISIS were reported to the National Investigation Agency (NIA) in 2014 and it formed an ISIS research cell in March 2019.

The NIA looked into 112 people in India for intending to join ISIS, with the southern Indian state of Kerala having the most pro-ISIS cases. About 100 Indians traveled to Syria to join ISIS. The primary ISIS-affiliated organization in India is the Indian Mujahideen (IM), whose former commander, Shafi Armar, was its media head in Syria. He was neutralised in Syria in March 2019. In addition, he was the leader of Ansar-ut Tawhid fi Bilad al-Hind, an ISIS-affiliated organization iin India.

Armar previously used social media to recruit 17 members for Junood-ul-Khilafa-Fil-Hind, an outfit that aimed to build an ISIS-aligned caliphate in India. The Indian government has also been concerned about radicalization among the more than eight million Indians who currently live in the Gulf.

ISIS-KP province which encompasses Afghanistan and Pakistan has been the outfit’s most well-established regional presence on the ground. The organization was the first ISIS offshoot outside of the Middle East. It was founded in October 2014. ISIS built its headquarters in eastern Afghanistan after former Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistani commanders swore loyalty to the group. Governments in South Asia now have to deal with ISIS and the threat of violence inspired by the group is growing throughout the region.

The terror organization announced the creation of a new subcontinental Indian province, after the death of its last known member in the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir. Sri Lanka, India, Bangladesh and the Maldives are among the nine nations that are included in this province. It then declared a province of Pakistan after a few days.

India, located next to nations that are heavily radicalized namely Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan faces a significant threat from ISIS, which is establishing a presence in these countries as well as in Sri Lanka and India itself. This situation endangers the sovereignty, integrity and security of the entire region, especially India.

The absence of a major terrorist attack by ISIS in the country can be credited to the proactive measures taken by the Indian security appratus because the group has openly declared its animosity towards the Hindu-majority nation on numerous occasions. The South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC), the primary regional forum, is still inactive because of India’s concerns about cross-border terrorism by organizations based in Pakistan.

It is essential for the Indian government to enhance cooperation between domestic security and intelligence agencies, as well as with allied nations, to effectively combat the menace of ISIS terrorism, given the insufficient regional counter-terrorism collaboration.

‘Fact-checker’ Zubair does it again, resorts to ad-hominem attacks instead of fact-checking claim about Islam considering idol worship bigger sin than rape

Mohammed Zubair, the dubious ‘fact-checker’ from Alt News, is back in the business of targeting critics of Islam. He is making ad hominem attacks as a means to prevent people from knowing about problematic aspects of his Faith.

For the unversed, ad hominem attack is the illogical targeting of an individual instead of addressing the issues highlighted by him/her. Such a scenario was on display on Monday (21st April) when Zubair targeted a man named Ehsan through his tweet.

Ehsan, who had memorised the entire Quran, recently revealed during an interview that idol worship is a bigger sin in Islam than rape. He had pointed out that Allah might forgive rape but not shirk (idolatory).

Screengrab

If there is idol worship (murti puja) happening on one side and a rape is being committed on the other, which according to Islam is a bigger sin (gunah). As per Islam, it is idol worship (murti puja) and not rape that counts as a bigger sin. This is because Allah says that He will pardon everything but not shirk (idolatry),” Ehsan highlighted in crystal clear terms.

Given that the interview of Ehsan raised mass awareness about problematic facets of Islam, which are certainly incompatible with the functioning of the 21st-century society, the Mujahid in Mohammed Zubair got into firefighting mode.

He wasted no time in personally attacking Ehsan and his aide, Salim. The dubious ‘fact checker’ branded the duo as ‘ex-Muslims’ to hurt their credibility. But he shrewdly avoided fact-checking the statements made by Ehsan in the context of rape and idol worship in Islam.

Zubair resorted to such an ad hominem attack instead of actual ‘fact-checking’ because he knows that Ehsan said nothing but the truth.

Rape is forgivable in Islam, idol worship a bigger sin: Islamic scholars

Popular Islamic preacher Zakir Naik had previously confirmed that both rape and murder is forgivable in the eyes of Allah.

Even if you have committed rape which is a major sin and if you have committed murder, it’s a major sin. But if you truly repent, Allah will forgive you,” he had emphasised.

Naik had further highlighted that Allah is merciful when it comes to such matters. As per Islamic teachings, he pointed out that the girl should dress modestly else she should be blamed for being raped.

“If she wore obscene clothes because of which the rape took place, then she is responsible. But if she wore normal clothes and yet if the person rapes, then it is a test for the girl,” the Islamic scholar added.

Chicago-based Islamic scholar, Yasir Nadeem al Wajidi, has made it crystal clear in a YouTube video last month that idol worship (shirk) is a bigger sin than rape.

He has 3.5 lakh followers and is not an ex-Muslim, the argument which was used by Mohammed Zubair to de-legitimise the statements of Ehsan. This again shows why Zubair did not ‘fact-check’ Ehsan because the latter was right.

There is a seperate debate on how the onus to prove that a woman has been raped lies on the victim (she needs multiple witnesses), thereby making it easier for men to get away with the crime.

Not to forget that the heinous crime can be forgiven if one repents as life itself is a ‘test’ for the rapist and the rape victim.

The fact that Shirk or idol worship is the greatest sin in Islam, over heinous crimes, is made clear in the Quranic verse 4:48 –

Indeed, Allah does not forgive associating others with Him ˹in worship˺, but forgives anything else of whoever He wills. And whoever associates others with Allah has indeed committed a grave sin.

Zubair and his strategy to shield Islam from criticism through ad hominem attacks

This is not the first time that Mohammed Zubair of Alt News has tried to silence criticism of Islam, label critical, fact-based statements about his Faith by targeting individuals, playing the ‘Islamophobia card’ and unleashing his lynch mob at them.

This has been his SOP (Standard Operating Procedure) of sorts for quite some time now. Zubair shrewdly avoids fact-checking arguments and tries to character assassinate the individuals raising those arguments instead.

For instance, he unleashed his lynch mob against Nupur Sharma over her remarks about the nature of the relationship between the Islamic Prophet Muhammad and Aisha.

The facts shared by the then-BJP spokesperson in the context of a debate on Times Now have been reiterated by many prominent Islamic scholars. Zubair did not ‘fact-check’ Nupur Sharma and instead resorted to an ad hominem attack.

He is currently using the same strategy on Ehsan by putting labels on him, despite the fact that he is a Quran-e-Hafiz.

Not to forget that the statements made by Ehsan find references in Islamic theology and have been upheld by prominent Islamic scholars.

Zubair does it routinely to deter people from criticising his Faith or asking uncomfortable questions about the functioning of Muslim societies.

He also finds labels to put on other Muslims, who are not sympathetic to radical Islamist activities. The dubious fact checker would randomly find a picture of such a Muslim man with a BJP leader and dub him ‘sarkari Musalman’ – who does not reflect the views of the community which he represents.

The concerning part in the latest episode is that Ehsan has left Islam after practising it for decades. It’s an act of apostasy, which is punishable by death.

Zubair has highlighted this aspect in his tweet prominently, perhaps to send another set of lynch mob on Ehsan’s way and endanger his life (as he did in the case of Nupur Sharma).

Waqf property misused in Ahmedabad for 20 years: Salim and 4 others arrested for illegal rent collection after whistleblower Mohammad files complaint

In a shocking case from Ahmedabad’s Jamalpur area, five individuals illegally occupied prime Waqf Board land worth crores, constructed shops, and collected rent for over two decades—all while falsely claiming to be Waqf trustees. Instead of the rent going to the Waqf Board as it legally should have, the money went straight into their own pockets.

What’s even more alarming? The Waqf Board knew about the scam but took no action, even after formal complaints were filed.

The land in question originally belonged to the Waqf Board and had been handed over to the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC), which built Urdu schools there. However, after the 2001 earthquake, the schools became unsafe and were demolished. That’s when a man named Salimkhan Pathan swooped in and, instead of rebuilding schools, constructed ten shops and began renting them out.

But that’s not all. Around 150 residential units on nearby Waqf land were also part of the illegal rent racket. Salimkhan Pathan, along with Mohammad Yasir Shaikh, Mehmoodkhan Pathan, Faiz Mohammad Pir Mohammad, and Sahid Ahmed Shaikh, posed as trustees and collected rent for years without depositing a single rupee into the official Waqf accounts.

It took a rickshaw driver named Mohammad Rafiq Ansari to blow the whistle. After realising that these men were not actual trustees, he filed a complaint, first with the Waqf Board and later with the police. Surprisingly, the FIR revealed that the accused were never legally associated with the board, yet operated unchecked for 20 years.

Rafiq Ansari expressed frustration that despite notifying the Waqf Board and even meeting with the Gujarat Waqf Board President Mohsin Lokhandwala in Gandhinagar, no action was taken. He suspects internal collusion, claiming that such a long-running scam could only be possible if insiders were involved.

In a conversation with OpIndia, Mohammad Rafiq Ansari, the man who filed the police complaint, revealed that once he discovered Salim Khan and his group were not legitimate trustees, he immediately contacted the Waqf Board and even travelled to Gandhinagar to file an official complaint. According to him, he reported the matter directly to Mohsin Lokhandwala, the Chairman of the Gujarat Waqf Board, but no action was taken. Even after alerting the Board about the illegal occupation of Waqf land, there was complete inaction.

Rafiq further stated that such a scam could only happen if there were insiders involved. His suspicion seems justified, given the circumstances. He emphasised that the police should also investigate why the Waqf Board failed to act despite being aware of the situation. Additionally, he called for an inquiry into the role of responsible Waqf officials, so that justice can be served to the poor Muslims who were denied their rightful benefits. It is a serious matter that for 20 years, revenue from valuable properties was illegally collected by individuals while the Waqf Board knowingly turned a blind eye. A thorough investigation is essential to uncover the full truth and ensure accountability.

The case has raised serious questions about governance and accountability. How could unauthorised shops and houses exist for decades on protected Waqf land? Why did the Waqf Board remain silent despite knowing the truth?

Thanks to the new amendments in the Waqf Act, Rafiq believes that such frauds will now be harder to pull off. “These changes ensure people like Salimkhan can no longer illegally grab land and claim ownership without repercussions,” he said, expressing his appreciation for the reforms brought by the BJP government. He also lauded the efforts of the Ahmedabad Police, especially officer Gosai, for finally initiating action where the Waqf Board failed.

“I appreciate the BJP government”: Complainant

Speaking to OpIndia, the complainant expressed his support for the new Waqf law, stating that it will prevent individuals like Salimkhan Pathan from illegally occupying Waqf land and hold the Waqf Board accountable. He revealed that despite filing a complaint in Gandhinagar with the Gujarat Waqf Board chairman, no action was taken. However, he praised the BJP government for introducing a law that makes such illegal takeovers difficult.

He also suspects that some insiders within the Waqf Board were involved in the scam, which is why no action was taken earlier. Later, he approached the Ahmedabad police and commended Officer Gosai and the police team for taking action against the culprits.

Ironically, the same corrupt elements who benefited from the broken system are now leading protests against the new Waqf laws. Their real fear? Losing control over illegally claimed properties and the steady flow of income that came with them.

If the updated Waqf Act had been in place earlier, this scam—and many like it—could’ve been prevented. The reforms not only aim to protect Waqf land but also ensure that the wealth is used for the benefit of poor and marginalised Muslims, rather than enriching a handful of self-declared power brokers.

In conclusion, the Jamalpur case is likely just the tip of the iceberg. Across India, there may be many more instances where a few individuals have hijacked public religious assets for personal gain. The new Waqf law seeks to put an end to this exploitation—and naturally, those who profited from the old system are now crying foul.

Sri Lanka Easter attacks anniversary: How a pregnant Fatima Ibrahim, wife of the ISIS terrorist, blew herself up, killing her 3 children with her, when the police came to search

Six years ago, on 21st April 2019, Sri Lanka was shaken by one of the deadliest terrorist attacks in South Asia. Suicide bombers affiliated with Islamist terrorist organisations targeted churches and luxury hotels during Easter services, leading to the deaths of 359 people. More than 500 people were reported injured. The carnage was attributed to the local National Thowheed Jamaath (NTJ), a terrorist outfit linked to ISIS. The incident left deep scars on the island nation. One of the most shocking aspects of the attack was that among the bombers was a pregnant woman, Fatima Ibrahim. She was the wife of Ilham Ahmed Ibrahim, one of the bombers at Shangri-La hotel. When the police identified the bomber and reached his home to search at Dematagoda, Fatima blew herself up along with her three children, her unborn child, and three police officers.

A morning of terror – The 2019 Easter bombings that shook Sri Lanka

On the fateful day, Sri Lanka awoke to a coordinated wave of suicide bombings. Six locations were targeted almost simultaneously. The first explosions ripped through St Anthony’s Shrine in Colombo, St Sebastian’s Church in Negombo, and Zion Church in Batticaloa. All the locations were packed with Christian worshippers celebrating Easter mass. Within minutes, three luxury hotels in Colombo — the Shangri-La, Cinnamon Grand, and The Kingsbury — were also targeted.

Later that day, two more blasts occurred. The first blast took place in Dehiwala and another during a raid in a residential area in Dematagoda, when authorities closed in on suspected operatives. A total of 359 people were killed, including 45 foreign nationals, and over 500 were injured.

Source: Al Jazeera

The Sri Lankan government identified a local jihadist group, National Thowheed Jamaath (NTJ), as being behind the attacks. NTJ was an associated terrorist outfit linked to the Islamic terrorist organisation ISIS. Soon after, the Islamic State’s Amaq News Agency claimed responsibility for the attack. Though the international outfit claimed responsibility, the Sri Lankan and international investigators concluded that while NTJ was ideologically inspired by ISIS, the operational planning appeared largely domestic.

The attacks on multiple locations in Sri Lanka exposed serious intelligence failures. In fact, weeks before the attacks, Indian intelligence services had warned Sri Lanka about the planned suicide attacks. Despite the warnings, no preventive measures were taken by the Sri Lankan authorities. A report was later submitted to a Sri Lankan parliamentary select committee which stated that the “entire intelligence apparatus” had failed to act on multiple warnings. The attacks dealt a serious blow to the fragile post-civil war peace in the island country and highlighted that global jihadist ideologies are capable of finding fertile ground even in far-flung regions. Notably, according to the 2012 census, only 9.7% of the people in Sri Lanka are Muslims, and Christians are even fewer in number. Despite the low population density, the Islamic fundamentalists managed not only to penetrate the intelligence apparatus but to conduct one of the deadliest attacks in Sri Lankan history.

Fatima Ibrahim: the radicalised wife of one of the terrorists

One of the suicide bombers was identified as Fatima Ibrahim. She was the wife of Ilham Ahmed Ibrahim, one of the primary accused and main terrorists who entered the Shangri-La Hotel. They were part of a prominent and affluent Muslim family in Sri Lanka. Her father-in-law, Mohamed Yusuf Ibrahim, was a well-known spice trader and chairman of Ishana Export, a Colombo-based company. The family resided in a luxurious three-storey house in the upscale neighbourhood of Mahawela Gardens in Colombo.

Source: The Hindu Businessline

Following the attack, security forces conducted a raid on the Ibrahim family residence. During the operation, Fatima detonated a suicide vest, which not only blew her up but also killed three children and three police officers. Fatima was pregnant at that time, and the blast killed the unborn child with her.

The news of the Ibrahim family’s involvement in the attacks sent shockwaves through the neighbourhood and the community. Their social standing and lack of prior indications of radicalisation led to disbelief among the neighbours and acquaintances. They noted that the family did not show any outward signs of extremist behaviour.

When motherhood yields to jihad – What drove Fatima to kill?

Shangri-La Hotel in Colombo was one of the primary targets of the attacks. At around 8:57 AM, two suicide bombers, identified as Zahran Hashim and Ilham Ahmed Ibrahim, detonated explosives in the hotel’s Table One restaurant during breakfast service. It resulted in numerous fatalities and injuries among the guests and staff. While Hashim was the alleged leader of NTJ, Ibrahim was Fatima’s husband.

Source: Al Jazeera

Later that day, when security forces conducted a raid on Ibrahim’s residence, Fatima detonated the vest. The act of violence showed how not only Ibrahim was radicalised, but that it extended within the family. It showed that the operational reach of NTJ was far deeper, contributing to the intensity of the attacks. The devastating impact of extremist ideologies is not limited to one person in the family and can often extend to several members of the same family, which increases the challenges faced by the authorities who are trying to prevent such acts of terror.

Fatima’s decision to end her life and those of her children, including the unborn one, highlighted the profound impact of extremist indoctrination. It reflects how radical ideologies can override basic human instincts, including a mother’s natural inclination to protect her offspring. It is a stark reminder of how destructive the power of extremist beliefs can be. It also highlights the importance of early detection and intervention in preventing such radicalisation.

ISIS and its deadly grip – Radicalisation that breeds death over life

The NTJ was behind the Sri Lanka Easter attacks, and was a local Islamist extremist group. The group had previously been involved in acts of religious intolerance, including the vandalism of Buddhist statues. NTJ’s ideology was influenced by Salafi-jihadist teachings, and its leader was Zahran Hashim. Notably, Hashim was known for promoting extremist views.

Source: Al Jazeera

After the attack, ISIS claimed responsibility, though the extent of their direct involvement remained unclear. However, ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi had praised them in a video released by the group.

The radicalisation process that led to the attacks involved a combination of local grievances and exposure to global jihadist narratives. NTJ’s propaganda highlighted perceived injustices against Muslims worldwide, including events in Myanmar and the Middle East. The group’s messaging aimed to foster a sense of victimhood and urgency among its followers. They encouraged them to take violent actions.

Unfortunately, well-educated and well-off individuals fell for the propaganda, which underscores the complexity of the radicalisation process and how the appeal of extremist ideologies can reach deep into communities irrespective of their social status. In response to the attacks, NTJ was banned by the Sri Lankan authorities. Several other extremist organisations were also banned. The government implemented emergency regulations to enhance security measures. Furthermore, Sri Lanka re-evaluated its counter-terrorism strategies and highlighted the need for improved intelligence sharing and community engagement so that such incidents could be avoided in the future.

The psychological machinery of radical Islamism

The radicalisation process that led to the 2019 bombings in Sri Lanka involved a complex interplay of psychological, social, and ideological factors. It is essential to understand these elements to comprehend how individuals from seemingly stable backgrounds can commit acts of extreme violence.

Quest for significance and identity

According to psychologist Arie Kruglanski’s “3N” model — Need, Narrative, and Network — these are the three key elements that offer insight into the radicalisation process. The model suggests that individuals experience a need for personal significance that can be fulfilled by adopting a compelling narrative and being part of a supportive network.

In the context of the Sri Lankan bombings, some of the individuals involved in the attack might have perceived their Muslim identity as being under threat, which was eventually the aim of the terror outfit. This made them vulnerable to extremist narratives that promised empowerment and purpose. NTJ propagated a Salafi-jihadist ideology that framed global events as a war against Islam. Their messaging could have resonated with individuals seeking meaning, especially when coupled with perceived social and political marginalisation.

Radical groups often feed their followers with a false sense of being targeted and marginalised. This victimhood penetrates deeper into their psychological behaviour which, in many cases, leads to such incidents.

Role of social networks

Radicalisation often occurs within close-knit groups where extremist beliefs are reinforced. In the Sri Lankan bombing case, several perpetrators were related or had close associations. This suggests that familial and social networks played a role in their radicalisation. Their close-knit group or network created an echo chamber that amplified extremist ideologies without raising red flags to those around them.

Psychological manipulation and indoctrination

The aim of extremist groups is to employ psychological tactics in such a way that the individuals following them become desensitised to violence and come to believe it is their duty to cause harm to others. This process can involve isolating them from alternative viewpoints, reinforcing a binary worldview, and glorifying martyrdom. Such extremist views can lead individuals to commit acts that contradict basic human instincts, including self-preservation and parental care.

Accountability and governance

In January 2023, Sri Lanka’s Supreme Court ruled that former President Maithripala Sirisena, along with top security officials, failed to prevent the 2019 attacks despite prior intelligence warnings. The court ordered Sirisena to pay 100 million Sri Lankan rupees in compensation to the victims’ families.

Cardinals conclave to be called after 9-days mourning period for Pope Francis to elect the next Pope, four Indian Cardinals will participate

0

Following the death of the Pope, the Vatican will enter a nine-day mourning period known as the Novendiale, an ancient Roman tradition that continues to this day. During this time, preparations will begin for the election of the next Pontiff. After the mourning period, the Cardinals will be called into Conclave to elect the next Vicar of Christ.

Among the 135 cardinals currently eligible to vote in the Papal conclave, four are from India. These include Cardinal Filipe Neri Ferrao, Cardinal Baselios Cleemis, Cardinal Anthony Poola, and Cardinal George Jacob Koovakad.

Cardinal George Jacob Koovakad (51), Cardinal-Deacon of S. Antonio di Padova a Circonvallazione Appia, and Prefect of the Dicastery for Interreligious Dialogue. Cardinal Filipe Neri Antonio Sebastiao do Rosario Ferrao (72), Metropolitan Archbishop of Goa and Daman (India), President of Conference of Catholic Bishops of India and President of Federation of Asian Bishops’ Conferences. Cardinal Anthony Poola (63), Metropolitan Archbishop of Hyderabad (India). Cardinal Baselios Cleemis Thottunkal, Major Archbishop of Trivandrum of the Syro-Malankara (India) and President of the Synod of the Syro-Malankara Church.

As of April 19, there are 252 cardinals, out of whom 135 are eligible to vote in a conclave to elect a new pope.

The colour of the smoke rising from the Sistine Chapel chimney serves as a traditional signal during the papal conclave. Black smoke means the cardinals have not yet selected a new Pope, while white smoke indicates that a new Pope has been elected.

Meanwhile, French President Emmanuel Macron mourned the death of Pope Francis. In a post on X, he wrote, “From Buenos Aires to Rome, Pope Francis wanted the Church to bring joy and hope to the poorest. May it unite people with each other and with nature. May this hope continually revive beyond him. My wife and I send our thoughts to all Catholics and to the grieving world.”

Roberta Metsola, President of the European Parliament, also shared a post on X and wrote, “Europe mourns the passing of His Holiness Pope Francis. His contagious smile captured millions of people’s hearts across the globe. ‘The People’s Pope’ will be remembered for his love for life, hope for peace, compassion for equality & social justice. May he rest in peace.”

The Pope passed away on Easter Monday, April 21, 2025, at the age of 88 at his residence in the Vatican’s Casa Santa Marta, according to a statement from the Vatican.

At 9:45 AM on Easter Monday, Cardinal Kevin Farrell, Camerlengo of the Apostolic Chamber, spoke these words at the Casa Santa Marta. “Dearest brothers and sisters, with deep sorrow, I must announce the death of our Holy Father Francis. At 7:35 this morning, the Bishop of Rome, Francis, returned to the house of the Father. His entire life was dedicated to the service of the Lord and of His Church. He taught us to live the values of the Gospel with fidelity, courage, and universal love, especially in favour of the poorest and most marginalised. With immense gratitude for his example as a true disciple of the Lord Jesus, we commend the soul of Pope Francis to the infinite merciful love of the One and Triune God.”

Born in Buenos Aires, Argentina, as Jorge Mario Bergoglio, he was ordained a Catholic priest in 1969. Following the resignation of Pope Benedict XVI on February 28, 2013, a papal conclave elected Cardinal Bergoglio as his successor on March 13. He chose Francis as his papal name in honour of Saint Francis of Assisi.

(This news report is published from a syndicated feed. Except for the headline, the content has not been written or edited by OpIndia staff)

Rahul Gandhi spreads fake news in US that more people voted in Maharashtra elections than total adults there, claims ‘something very wrong with the system’: Here’s the truth

Congress MP and Leader of Opposition (LoP) Rahul Gandhi is on a two-day visit to the United States. The Congress leader started his US visit with his usual tactic of hiding his own incompetence by pinning the blame on the ‘system’. While addressing the Indian diaspora at a meeting in Boston, Gandhi claimed that the Election Commission of India (ECI) is ‘compromised’.

Implying that the electoral process was manipulated to favour the Bhartiya Janata Party-led Mahayuti Alliance in Maharashtra elections, the Congress scion alleged that something is “very wrong with the system.”

Citing the example of the Maharashtra elections, Rahul Gandhi claimed that there was an addition of 65 lakh voters to the voter turnout in two hours, which was impossible.

“It is very clear to us that the Election Commission is compromised, and it is very clear that there is something wrong with the system. I have said this multiple times…More people voted in the Maharashtra Assembly elections than there are adults in Maharashtra. The Election Commission gave us a voting figure for 5:30 PM and between 5:30 PM and 7:30 PM, 65 lakh voters voted. This is physically impossible. For a voter to vote, it takes approx 3 minutes, and if you do the Math, it would mean that there were lines of voters till 2 AM, but this did not happen…When we asked them for the videography, they not only refused but they also changed the law so that now we are not allowed to ask for the videography…” Gandhi said.

Meanwhile, the BJP launched a scathing attack on Rahul Gandhi over his allegations on Indian democratic systems, and the party’s spokesperson Shehzad Poonawalla said, “Rahul Gandhi is a serial offender. He has taken SUPARI against Indian institutions. Every time he’s on foreign soil, in BJP Virodh he undertakes Badnami of Bharat. If he wins an election, ECI is fine. If he wins a court case, judiciary is fine. Otherwise, he will abuse and insult Indian institutions. First, he says I will fight Indian state and now he is doing Badnami of Bharat.”

Notably, the BJP-led Mahayuti coalition had won 235 out of 288 seats in the last assembly elections in Maharashtra giving a major setback to the Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA), the coalition of Congress, NCP, and Shiv Sena (UBT).

It seems like the historic victory of the BJP-led alliance in Maharashtra shattering all expectations of the MVA, has dealt a massive blow to the Congress party. Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s desperate attempts at pushing the same old ‘Democracy in danger’ narrative reflects the same. However, since the Congress leader decided to attack India’s electoral process and questioned the integrity of the Indian Election Commission on foreign soil, it is important to bust his lies about the alleged discrepancies in the 2024 Maharashtra elections.

Rahul Gandhi peddling already debunked falsehoods on foreign soil

In November 2024, right after the BJP-led alliance registered a historic win in the Maharashtra assembly elections, the opposition parties and their supportive ecosystem started the usual ‘EVM hack’ rant instead of gracefully accepting the public’s mandate. The leftist propaganda portal TheWire had spearheaded this mendacious ‘Hum haare nahin hain, humein haraya gaya hai’ campaign, to cast aspersions on the integrity of the Election Commission and fairness of the electoral process. TheWire had claimed that 5,04,313 additional votes were cast during the Maharashtra state elections.

The Chief Electoral Officer (CEO) Maharashtra had debunked these lies. He stated that TheWire report had included 5,38,225 postal ballots in the votes counted, which was not part of the votes polled data released by CEO Maharashtra. It highlighted that 6,40,88,195 votes were cast in all 288 Assembly seats through EVMs, which has been “mischievously” displayed as the overall number of votes cast.

“The fact is that 5,38,225 valid postal ballots were not added in this figure. When we add the 5,38,225 valid postal ballots to the 6,40,88,195 votes polled through EVMs; the total votes polled come out to be 6,46,26,420. The total votes counted on the day of the counting including postal ballots is 6,45,92,508. Hence, the total votes counted are not more than the total votes polled,” the ECI official said.

CEO Maharashtra also explained why, in certain Constituencies, fewer votes were counted than those required by the established procedure and clarified, “The EVM counting is not taken up if Mock Poll Data was not cleared from the Control Unit of the Polling Station before actual start of Poll or if there is non-display of result in the display panel of Control Unit or there was mismatch in data reported in Form 17C and votes recorded in EVM due to clerical or typing human error. In such cases, as the winning margin was higher than the total votes polled in these Polling Stations, counting of VVPAT Slips of these Polling Stations was not done as per instructions contained in Para No.7(iv)(b) of ECIs letter dated 19.07.2023.”

Further explaining the voting percentage math, CEO Maharashtra had said, “In the 2024 Maharashtra Assembly Elections, the Voting percentage at 5 pm was 58.22% (approximate) and the final voting percentage was 66.05%. This is normal as voting continues even after 6 pm, till the last person who stood at the queue at 6 pm votes. Even in 2019, the percentages were 54.43% (approximate) at 5 pm and 61.10% at the final. Many voters come in the evening in urban and semi-urban areas, which constitute a large chunk in Maharashtra.  It is important to note that two-hourly voter turnout information on the day of poll upto 5 pm is based on oral telephonic communication only. On the other hand,  Form-17C which is given at the ‘Close of Poll’ to polling agents, matches with the final percentage and votes counted. Information in Form-17 C is matched by the Candidate’s counting agents while counting.”

Notably, the opposition parties and journalist-turned-YouTuber propagandists had widely used the lies peddled by TheWire in its report to question the Election Commission’s integrity and to push the narrative that the BJP’s victory was the product of some sort of rigging in their favour. In addition, Rahul Gandhi had in February this year claimed that over 7 million voters were suspiciously added between the Lok Sabha elections and the state assembly elections.

It is interesting to note that just days back, the election commission refuted the accusations of irregularities in Maharashtra’s electoral roll published in January this year. Hardly any first or second appeals were made under Section 24 of the Representation of People Act, or correction of any entries in Electoral Rolls (Section 22) or Inclusion (Section 23) during the recent Special Summary Revision published on January 6-7, 2025. The Special Summary Revision (SSR) involves reviewing the voter list and unveiling a draft electoral roll. It is often held prior to elections and aims to uphold a just and transparent voting process by adding newly eligible voters, including those who have reached the age of 18 or have changed their constituency. It also involves the elimination of duplicate and deceased voters.

The ECI said that only 89 appeals for changes with the district election office and only one with the chief electoral office were filed against 9.7 crore registered voters.

The ECI asserted that this negligible number contradicts the claims made by opposition parties in parliament’s winter session.

“We received 89 first appeals that were cleared at the district level, and only one second appeal came up to the chief electoral office in Maharashtra,” TOI quoted an ECI official as saying.

It all started after LoP Rahul Gandhi sought a discussion in the Lok Sabha, alleging addition of over 30 lakh voters between 2019 and 2024 in Maharashtra and duplication of the elector photo identity card (EPIC) numbers. The ECI earlier stated that duplication of EPIC numbers does not essentially reflect duplicate or fake voters. The commission had also released data on the total electors and the booth-level agents from political parties in the country.

Despite the Election Commission of India refuting the lies and propaganda of the opposition parties casting aspersion on electoral integrity, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi has the audacity to travel abroad and shamelessly peddle lies to tarnish the image of India’s functioning democracy.

Rahul Gandhi and his track record of maligning India’s image on foreign soil

This, however, is not the first time that Rahul Gandhi has visited a foreign nation to give a positive representation of India, rather, to seek foreign intervention in India’s internal affairs, attack political adversaries, cry ‘democracy in danger’, meet people linked to anti-India and anti-Hindu entities, and secretly meet Chinese officials at a time when India was engaged in conflict with the country. Rahul Gandhi and the Congress party have also been toeing the narrative fueled by known Modi detractor and regime change specialist George Soros. Back in June 2023, during his 10-day US tour, Rahul Gandhi was seen with Sunita Vishwanath, the co-founder of a US-based and Soros-linked anti-Hindu organisation, which is ironically called “Hindus for Human Rights”  in a picture of a talk shared by the Hudson Institute.

From signing MoU with China’s community party to hobnobbing with organisations peddling the Islamist narrative, to mirroring the anti-Modi agenda so much so that it almost mimics the stand of the government of Pakistan, Congress has been virtually knocking the doors of the West to help them gain power from the hands of India’s democratically elected government.

In April 2021, speaking at Harvard Kennedy School’s Institute of Politics, Gandhi insisted that the US government establishment should ‘say more’ about ‘what is happening in India’. In 2022, at the ‘Ideas for India’ conference in the United Kingdom, Rahul Gandhi had sought foreign intervention again. During his controversial address, Rahul Gandhi signaled his desire for foreign intervention two times.

Not to forget how in 2023, Rahul Gandhi traveled abroad to Cambridge University to paint a fake grim picture of India, alleging democracy under attack of a so-called ‘dictatorship’ of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

OpIndia has time and again reported how Rahul Gandhi has over the years been repeatedly demanding foreign intervention in India’s internal affairs during his visits to the US, UK and other countries.

By peddling the ‘ECI compromised’ lies, Gandhi once again is shifting the blame from his party’s failures and evade accountability as a party leader. Gandhi’s audacity to question ECI’s integrity based on already debunked lies is a blatant attempt at undermining public trust, both within the country and abroad, in India’s electoral system. If Congress was actually serious about its ‘ECI compromised’ allegations, it would have boycotted elections or provided solid evidence, not debunked lies peddled by leftist propagandists. Apparently, Rahul Gandhi wants to send out a message to foreign powers that somehow just because Congress and its allies could not win elections in one state or overthrow the BJP-led NDA in Lok Sabha elections, India’s democratic framework is crumbling and its time the foreign powers intervene to do what Congress motormouth Mani Shankar Aiyar once said: “Unhe hataiye humein laiye” (remove them, bring us).

Congress keeps the caste pot boiling: Siddaramaiah vows to pass ‘Rohith Vemula Act’ even after Telangana closure report confirmed Vemula was not a Dalit at all

On 19th April, Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah wrote to Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi to inform him that he had instructed his legal team to start drafting the “Rohith Vemula Act.” The legislation is intended to eliminate “caste-based discrimination” in educational institutions. Reflecting the usual pettiness of Congress’s political tactics, the party seems disinclined to let the conversation about the caste of the PhD scholar from the University of Hyderabad, who committed suicide on 17th January 2016, die down only to exploit the caste divide for electoral gain.

More importantly, the Telangana Police presented a closure report regarding the case to the Telangana High Court, on 3rd May of last year. It emphasized that he did not belong to the Scheduled Caste (SC) category and that he died by suicide, fearing the exposure of his true caste identity. The authorities also exonerated former Secunderabad MP and current governor of Haryana Bandaru Dattatreya, Legislative Council Member N Ramachander Rao, former Vice Chancellor Appa Rao, ABVP (Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad) leaders and former Union Minister Smriti Irani.

The recent announcement followed Siddaramaiah’s statement in which he reaffirmed his government’s intention to pass the law as soon as possible on 18th April after Rae Bareli Lok Sabha MP asked the Karnataka government to introduce the act, stating that caste discrimination in education must end. “I too, deeply share your sentiments, we must join hands to bring the Dalits, Adivasis and Backward classes into the mainstream. That the oppressed classes must no more face any discrimination in our educational system. My government and I are committed to ensuring an egalitarian and equal society,” he claimed in the letter.

In a 16th April letter to Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, Rahul Gandhi urged the state government to pass the “Rohith Vemula Act” to guarantee that no one is subjected to caste-based discrimination in the educational system. The development transpired after he recently met with students and teachers of the Dalit, Adivasi and OBC communities in Parliament and was allegedly informed that caste discrimination is pervasive in higher education.

“I knew I was an untouchable, and that untouchables were subjected to certain indignities and discriminations. For instance, I knew that in school I could not sit in the midst of my classmates according to my rank, but that I was to sit in a corner by myself,” the Gandhi scion wrote, quoting from Dr BR Ambedkar’s memoir.

“Ambedkar demonstrated that education is the primary means by which even the most deprived can become empowered and break the caste system. But it is very unfortunate that even after decades, lakhs of students are facing caste discrimination in our education system. This discrimination has taken the lives of promising students like Rohith Vemula, Payal Tadvi and Darshan Solanki,” he added.

“The reference in your letter dated 16th April 2025, to the incident faced by Dr BR Ambedkar, as narrated by him is indeed a sad reality even to this day. No child or adult must face the shame and stigma faced by Babasaheb,” Siddaramaiah remarked. As expected, the two leaders brought up Dr. BR Ambedkar and the discrimination he endured to resonate with public emotions while conveniently overlooking the fact that, unlike Ambedkar, Rohith Vemula was not identified as an SC, according to the police under Congress party’s government.

Telangana Police exposed the truth

“There is no evidence of any fact or circumstance available on the record which dragged him to commit suicide and no one is responsible for his death,” the closure report on Rohith Vemula’s death case pointed out.

It further conveyed that he took his life because “he had his own problems and was not happy with worldly affairs. If he would have been angry with the decision of the University, certainly either he would have written in specific words or would have indicated in this regard. But he did not do the same. It shows that the circumstances prevailing in the university at the time were not the reason for Rohith’s death.”

The closure report stated that Rohith Vemula obtained the SC certificate from his mother and was “aware that he does not belong to the Scheduled Caste.” It mentioned that he might have been always apprehensive since he could have lost his academic degrees and possibly been prosecuted if the truth had ever come to light.

Additionally, in his report, retired Justice Ashok Kumar Roopanwal, who looked into the circumstances at the University of Hyderabad that resulted in student Rohith Vemula’s suicide, noted that “the suicide did not relate to any activities of the university administration or the above political leaders, including the vice-chancellor, Prof. Appa Rao Podile.” He made the decision entirely on his own.

No end to caste politics

On the same day that the Telangana police revealed the circumstances surrounding Rohith Vemula’s death, the state’s Director General of Police (DGP) Ravi Gupta declared their intention to pursue additional investigations into the case. “As some doubts have been expressed by the mother and others of the deceased, Rohith Vemula, on the investigation conducted, it has been decided to conduct further investigation into the case. A petition will be filed in the court concerned requesting the Hon’ble Magistrate to permit further investigation into the case,” he informed.

He had previously stated that the case’s final report was completed in 2018 and was delivered to the jurisdictional court on 21st March 2024. “It is to state that the investigation officer in the case was Assistant Commissioner of Police, Madhapur and the final closure report in the case was prepared last year i.e. before November 2023 itself, based on the investigation conducted,” he stated.  

It was evidently an effort to continue stirring the contentious issue of caste politics, a strategy that the Congress party has frequently resorted to in their pursuit of power since being removed from the central government and facing significant defeats in various states at the hands of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

Ecosystem echoes same lies

Yogendra Yadav, a veteran propagandist and part-time political figure, took to social media to make similar accusations in an attempt to further capitalize on Rohith Vemula’s death and perpetuate disinformation crafted by the opposition parties to criticize the BJP-led central government.

“My birth is a fatal accident – these words of Rohith Vemula represent not just an individual agony, but the structural reality of caste discrimination in our educational institutions. If universities are centres of knowledge, reason and freedom, why was Rohith Vemula forced to get tired of his identity politics? Where are the roots of this injustice? What are these forces that fear the idea of ​​equality in society and institutionalise the politics of division? This question must be answered in honour of Rohith’s memory,” he shared online.

He chose to ignore the facts and instead spread propaganda, a move that underscores the desperation felt by Leftists after Narendra Modi’s third consecutive return as the prime minister of the country. After an official investigation concluded that there was no evidence of caste discrimination and that Rohith Vemula ended his life for personal reasons, he effectively associated the incident to issues of injustice, societal inequality and the institutionalization of divisive politics, which were not pertinent to the actual case but rather more reflective of their agenda.

Congress and its divisive agenda

On 5th April of last year, the Congress party provoked significant backlash by seeking to divide the nation along caste lines in its Lok Sabha election manifesto. This narrative has been persistently highlighted by senior party figures, especially Rahul Gandhi, both domestically and internationally. Congress committed to carrying out a nationwide caste census to assess the socio-economic status of various sub-castes as well as pledged to incorporate fishing communities into the caste census.

The party notably sought to impose the “Rohit Vemula Act” throughout the nation if it secured power at the centre. “We will enact the Rohith Vemula Act to address discrimination faced by students belonging to the backward and oppressed communities in educational institutions,” the manifesto read. “Congress will conduct a nation-wide Socio-Economicand Caste Census to enumerate the castes and sub-castes and their socio-economic conditions. Based on the data, we will strengthen the agenda for affirmative action,” it outlined.

Congress even declared its intention to raise the reservation cap from the current 50%, as stipulated by the Supreme Court of India, a promise that party leaders have consistently reiterated. It also vowed to enhance the distribution of public works contracts to members of the Scheduled Castes (SCs)/Scheduled Tribes (STs) community. Moreover, Congress pledged to implement a law that would provide reservations for SC/ST and OBC (Other Backward Class) groups in private educational institutions.

Drawing inspiration from American politics, the grand old party even committed to creating a Diversity Commission” to enhance diversity in both education and employment sectors, both public and private.

The caste reality

According to Rohith Vemula’s father Mani Kumar, he and his spouse are not Mala of Madigas (SC/ST) but rather members of the Veddera caste. The statement was in contradiction to the reports that his mother Radhika Vemula, belongs to a Dalit community (SC or ST) and he opted to identify with her caste after the couple separated.

His father emphasised that Rohith Vemula was murdered and criticized leftist groups for exploiting his son’s death to launch attacks against the Modi administration. Moreover, his mother alleged that she was born into a Mala caste (SC) family but was raised by a Veddera family.

In 2017, the Andhra Pradesh government was reported to have canceled Rohith Vemula’s scheduled caste certificate, asserting that he was actually a member of the Other Backward Classes (OBC). The government contended that the SC certificate had been acquired through “fraudulent” means.

Conclusion

It is apparent that the opposition parties headed by the Congress have politicized the death of Rohith Vemula to fracture the nation along caste divisions, prioritizing their electoral advantage over the pursuit of justice or addressing discrimination faced by any community. His death spurred opposition political parties and liberals to raise concerns about caste discrimination only to craft a narrative that implicated the Modi government in the oppression of lower caste groups. This was in stark contrast to his suicide note, which expressed his discontent with the Students Federation of India (SFI).

“The PM gave a speech where he expressed grief and agony over the death of the scholar. People say he even had tears. I would ask him, if you are saddened, if your tears are real, then act against the VC who crushed and intimated that boy and sack him. The nation’s poor and Dalit are looking up at Modi seeking answers, will he take action,” Rahul Gandhi commented at the time.

Rahul Gandhi, along with several other opposition leaders, persisted in promoting the narrative that a “Dalit” student faced oppression and was forced into suicide, asserting that the truth was being suppressed. “They say Rohith Vemula committed suicide. I call it murder. He was murdered by the indignities he suffered. He was killed because he was a Dalit. Hitler, once wrote: Keep a firm grasp on reality, so you can strangle it at any time. This is what is happening today-strangulation of reality,” the parliamentarian remarked in 2017.

No one awaited the official report, as they were little interest in uncovering the truth and rather they opportunistically aimed to leverage the tragic incident for their own advantage. The opposition has been doing the same to this day. Rohith Vemula’s death was unscrupulously manipulated into a political issue dividing Dalits and Non-Dalits for the sake of votes. Their hope did not materialize, as the falsehoods were revealed by their own administration. Yet, the truth has never been a priority for Congress and other opposition parties who continue to push the same agenda for votes.