Home Blog Page 6475

Congress did not follow up for listing of JeM chief Masood Azhar: India’s former Permanent Representative to UN

As soon as the news of the chief of the Jaish-e-Muhammad terror outfit, Masood Azhar being designated as a global terrorist on the United Nations Sanctions List trickled in, the Congress party scrambled to snatch some of the credit for the development. Taking a jibe at the NDA government, Congress in said, “The process was started in 2009 under UPA government and we are happy that process has concluded after 10 years.”


However, Hardeep Singh Puri, who served as Permanent Representative of India to the United Nations from 2009 to 2013 has busted Congress’ lies claiming that they are in always in the habit of lying. Puri said, ” I was there as a Permanent Representative of India to the United Nations. Congress is blatantly lying in claiming credit for Azhar’s listing. They did not follow up for the listing of Jaish chief Masood Azhar.”


With Puri’s recent assertions, Congress’ big fat lie regarding Masood Azhar’s listing stands exposed. Debunking Congress’ lies, Puri further said, “They were in power from 2009 to 2014. If they couldn’t do anything in those 5 years to get Masood Azhar listed, why are they claiming credit for a 10-year-old thing now?”

He further added that as Congress’ policies on national security have been a failure and now PM Modi’s government has been delivering results on issues of national security and actions on terrorists, Congress is now trying to cover up their failures by telling lies.

It is notable here that there have been four attempts to list Azhar as a global terrorist in the UN security council. After the 2009 proposal India had moved in the UN, the next proposal to ban Azhar was moved only in 2016 by the Modi government. In 2017, another proposal was moved. Earlier this year, China had blocked the fourth proposal too but after the clearing of technicalities, yesterday, Azhar was finally declared a global terrorist by the UN.

The ban on Azhar will now lead to a global travel ban, assets freeze and arms embargo.

‘Activist’ who signed mercy petition for Yakub Memon now bats for illegal immigrants, moves petition for CJI to recuse himself from case

Activist Harsh Mander, the obsessive Ishrat Jahan apologist, has filed a petition in the Supreme Court seeking recusal of Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi from hearing a case relating to the condition of detention camps and deportation of illegal immigrants from Assam.


Harsh Mander had originally filed a petition on the conditions of illegal immigrants caught and kept in detention centres in Assam, most of whom are Bangladeshis, and later the court had expanded it to examine the status of deportation of the foreigners. In a petition filed through Prashant Bhushan, Harsh Mandar had alleged that persons declared as foreigners by the Foreigners Tribunals were kept in inhuman conditions in the detention camps in Assam. The petition had argued that keeping illegal immigrants in camps violates the articles 14 and 21 of the constitution.

A large number of people are kept in the camps even after the expiry of their jail term awarded by the Tribunal, as there is no formal agreement between India and Bangladesh for sending back the illegal Bangladeshis caught in India, and they can’t be released in India as they will become untraceable. For this reason, the apex court had included the matter of deportation in the case, so that the matter can be resolved.

But now the portioner had objected to CJI Ranjan Gogoi hearing the case, alleging that the CJI has “through his actions proved that he is interested in the repatriation of the illegal immigrants/foreigners and is using the petition to ensure that the State of Assam commits mass deportation of alleged foreigners”.


Solicitor General Tushar Mehta has strongly objected to the petition, calling it scandalous.

This petition by Harsh Mander shows that in the name of conditions of detention camps, the activists want to prevent deportation of illegal immigrants to their origin countries. People kept in detention camps are proved as illegal immigrants after detailed proceedings in the Tribunals, and there should not be any objection if they are sent back.

If the detainees are released from camps in the name of inhuman conditions but not deported, they will have to be accommodated in the society, which will defeat the very purpose of the mechanism of detection of deportation of illegal immigrants from India. The court will hear the petition at 2 PM today.

Harsh Mander had recently written a shoddy article that thanking Jinnah. In the article, the activist Harsh Mander writes about the ‘political marginalisation’ of Muslims. This is strikingly similar to one of the key reasons cited by Jinnah for a separate country. This attracted the attention of Twitter users. Some of them tacitly approved the comment, while others opposed it.

He was also a part of the liberal-secular ecosystem that signed a mercy petition for Yakub Memon and was instrumental in the formulation of the Communal Violence Bill that deemed all Muslims as the victims and Hindus are the aggressors should communal violence take place.

Left-Liberals have no right to shed tears on Gadchiroli massacre when they shamelessly provide Naxals with intellectual cover

In a despicable instance of Left-Wing terrorism, 16 security personnel lost their lives after an IED blast at Gadchiroli, Maharashtra. The landmine blast blew up two vehicles carrying a team of the C-60 commandos, an anti-Naxal unit, who were patrolling the area.

Over the years, Left-Wing terrorism has claimed the lives of thousands and thousands of our soldiers and civilians. And despite the inhumanity, they have regularly exhibited in their conduct, their terrorism is still portrayed as a righteous struggle in many quarters.

One of the primary reasons why Naxalism survives to this day is because the Indian State has been waging the war with one arm tied behind their back. The Intelligentsia has regularly and often chastised the Indian State whenever it has tried to crush the Naxal forces. Under the UPA regime, such people exerted disproportionate influence in policy.

For any brand of terrorism to be really successful, it is essential that the movement has sympathizers out of it whose primary objective is to humanize the adherents of the core ideology that inspires terrorists and prevent the implementation of any measure that has the potential to curb these terrorist activities.

We see this particular phenomenon with Islamic terrorism all the time. A certain section of the Intelligentsia is always quick to condemn any violent acts of terrorism, however, they prevent any legitimate discussion on the actual issues that inspire the terrorists to commit massacred. Simultaneously, the terrorists are projected as some ‘misguided youth’ who turned towards terrorism because of some crime committed by the victim community. It could be ‘Islamophobia’, ‘racism’ or simply saying that Sharia has no place in modern society or something more innocent like a joke. But the real problem, you see, according to the intelligentsia is anything but the core beliefs of the terrorists’ ideology.

A very similar phenomenon is observed with Left-Wing Terrorism as well. We have a bunch of ‘intellectuals’ who will be very quick to condemn whenever Naxalites slaughter innocents. However, the rest of the time, they will be busy portray Naxals as some sort of Robinhood who are fighting for the rights of the disenfranchised.

Kanhaiya Kumar is, perhaps, the perfect example of this brand of intellectualism. He was quick to offer his condolences and condemn the terror attack that claimed the lives of 16 of our soldiers.


The Communist candidate from Begusarai is the same individual who believes that Naxals should be awarded the status of a martyr.


Kanhaiya Kumar is the quintessential activist who encapsulates all that human rights activism stands for. That he has the backing of the entire Intelligentsia and is being projected as a great intellectual himself without having any great achievement to his credit is perhaps the greatest tragedy for our nation.

Last year, Gadchiroli was the site of one of the most successful anti-Naxal operation in Indian history. As it turns out, human rights organizations called it a state-sponsored mass slaughter. One particular intellectual, who is currently under arrest in connection with the violence at Bhima Koregaon and an alleged plot to assassinate the Prime Minister, attended the funeral of a slain Naxal Terrorist. Another of those arrested, Arun Ferreira attended high-level Naxal Meetings and was a member of the CPI (Maoists) as revealed to OpIndia.com by surrendered Naxal Pahad Singh himself.

According to Singh, these ‘jobless intellectuals’ are as dangerous as the footsoldiers on the ground as these were the people who often brainwash Adivasis into picking the gun. And these are people who are widely respected in the intellectual fraternity. The crackdown on these terrorist sympathizers last year, we were told, was fascism.

The sole purpose of these intellectuals is to humanize the terrorists and deflect criticism of the actual ideology that motivates these individuals to commit the atrocities they do. In doing so, they cripple the ability of the Indian State to deal effectively with these terrorist networks. These intellectuals would rather blame the Indian State, which has been more than lenient with these subversive elements, than the actual morbid ideology of the terrorists. Today, they are condemning the attack but tomorrow, they will be back again whitewashing the crimes of the Naxalites.

‘Cultured families should keep their children away from such a person’: Smriti Irani on Priyanka Gandhi Vadra watching over as children abused Modi

Two days ago, a distressing video went viral where Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, sister of Congress President Rahul Gandhi was seen smiling and watching over as children, coached by Congress, were abusing PM Modi. The children raised ‘chowkidar chor hai’ and ‘neem ka patta kadwa hai, Modi sa**a bh***a hai’ slogans. Today, Smriti Irani reacting to the viral video said cultured families should keep their children away from such a person (Priyanka Gandhi Vadra).


Smriti Irani asked whether Priyanka Gandhi Vadra knows that children should not be used for political activity. She also hit about at Vadra by asking what sort of values is she giving children.

Union Minister Smriti Irani then said that cultured families should keep their children away from such a person.


It is pertinent to note here that the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) has written to the Election Commission (EC) regarding the video where Congress General Secretary and Congress President Rahul Gandhi’s sister Priyanka Gandhi is seen giggling and laughing as children abused PM Modi.

In its letter, the NCPCR stated that they are in receipt of a complaint which has a video video where children are actively participating in an election campaign. “The children can be seen making derogatory remarks and using abusive languages in the presence of Congress general secretary Priyanka Gandhi,” stated the letter. The commission mentioned that as per a letter issued dated January 20, 2017, it had asked the EC to “ensure that children are not involved for election purposes and also, had recommended to all national parties to not to use children for distribution of posters/pamphlets, participate in slogan shouting, rallies etc.”

Manmohan Singh lies again, this time about ‘surgical strikes’ conducted in UPA era

Former Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh, who led the government during the ten years of UPA, has lied. In his interview with Hindustan Times with former NDTV journalist Suneta Choudhury, who was excited when Modi was diagnosed with swine flu, Dr Manmohan Singh said that ‘multiple surgical strikes’ took place during his tenure as the prime minister.

Stating that the armed forces were given a free hand to operationally respond to threats, Dr Singh said, “Multiple surgical strikes took place during our tenure too. For us, military operations were meant for strategic deterrence and giving a befitting reply to anti-India forces than to be used for vote garnering exercises.”

However, the DGMO (Director-General of Military Operations) in a reply to an RTI filed said that there are no records or proofs of any surgical strike being carried out prior to September 29, 2016. The DGMO was responding to a specific question about surgical strikes being carried out between 2004 and 2014.

Earlier too, Congress has peddled the lie that UPA government had carried out surgical strikes too. Right after the Uri surgical strike, Congress’ Randeep Surjewala had said that such strikes were conducted in UPA tenure too. “We are proud that even in the past our forces have successfully conducted such surgical strikes on numerous occasions, he had said at a press briefing right after the surgical strike. Giving specifics, he had said, “Particularly on September 1, 2011, July 28, 2013, and January 14, 2014, giving a befitting reply to the enemy. In its maturity, wisdom and in the interest of national security, the Congress Government avoided making loud claims for the effective response and action of the Indian Army. Not just the Congress government, the previous governments too had conducted surgical strikes.”

The DGMO at the Integrated Headquarters of Defense Ministry(Army) clarified in a statement that, “This section does not maintain records of any other surgical strikes if any conducted earlier.”

In addition, the RTI application had also sought the definition of surgical strikes in the Indian Army. The DGMO said,  “As per the information available in ‘open source’ the definition of ‘surgical strike’ is ‘…an operation which is planned based on specific intelligence, on a legitimate military target for maximum effect and with minimum or no collateral damage. It involves deliberate insertion to the target area, precise execution and swift extrication of the body of troops back to the base’.”

Despite Army’s categorical denial, former Prime Minister of India, Dr Manmohan Singh lied.

This is not the first time he has lied. During the run-up to the Gujarat Assembly elections, Dr Singh had lied that Prime Minister Modi who was then the Chief Minister of Gujarat never discussed the Narmada with him. And he lied about Narmada issue while campaigning in Gujarat not once, but twice.

It is rather unfortunate that the leader who chose to remain silent for ten years as a prime minister, lies when he finally decides to speak up.

SC asks EC to check if voting can start at 5 AM after petition saying Muslim voters during Ramzan would face difficulty due to the heat

The Supreme Court has asked the Election Commission whether polling can start from 5 AM during the Muslim fasting period of Ramzan. The SC has asked the EC to pass necessary order in a representation that sought the preponement of voting from 7 AM to 5 AM owing to Ramzan. The petition said that this should be done to ensure convenient and fair opportunity for everyone to cast their vote, especially, the Muslim community.

The petitioners were Mohammad Nizammudin Pasha and Asad Hayat.

The petition sought the Supreme Court to direct the Election Commission to increase the time of polling for 2 to 2 and a half hours so the voting could begin at 4:30 AM or 5:00 AM as the logistics would permit for the rest of the three phases of 2019 Lok Sabha election. The Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed by two lawyers.

The petition said that several Muslims who are fasting would be unable to go out and cast their vote since the heat would be too severe.

The petition said:

“During this month, a large percentage of the voting population, i.e. adult Muslims, both men and women, young and old alike will be fasting and will not be consuming food or water starting approximately 1.5 hours before dawn till dusk every day. In this intense heat, it will be very difficult for Muslim voters to queue up at the polling booths during the day in the intense heat to exercise their franchise. During Ramzaan, most practising Muslims stay up / wake up for an early morning meal called Sehri and sleep after the morning Fajr prayer. Thereafter, they avoid going out in the heat to the extent possible to avoid thirst, dehydration and the possibility of heatstroke”.

The petition also said that the Indian Meteorological Department, Government of India has issued a temperature warning and that it is expected to be hotter than usual in Madhya Pradesh, Eastern UP, Bihar, Haryana, Delhi, Chandigarh, Jharkhand, Rajasthan and Himachal Pradesh. “In this intense heat, it will be very difficult for Muslim voters to queue up at the polling booths during the day to exercise their franchise.

Source: LiveLaw

The petition also said that advancement of the poll timing would allow Muslim to vote immediately after the morning prayers (Fajr) and return home before it gets too hot.

Source: LiveLaw

The petition also said that the representation has been made to the EC and EC hasn’t responded or acknowledged the representation. Hence, the SC is requested to direct the SC to extend timing to help Muslim voters.

Essentially, the petition requested the Supreme Court to direct EC to change polling rules because fasting Muslims would feel too hot while fasting during Ramzan. The petitioners also said that they have already made a representation to the Election Commission with this particular grievance. The Supreme Court has asked the Election Commission to pass necessary orders in this regard.

EU parliament threatens to cut subsidies and trade preferences to Pakistan, warns against persecution of religious minorities

In a collective letter addressed to Imran Khan on 30th April, 51 Members of the European Parliament addressed their concern over the persecution of religious minorities in Pakistan and warned him that failure to prevent such incidents would result in the suspension of subsidies and trade preferences to the country.

The letter reportedly read that Pakistan had deviated from the original intentions of Muhammed Ali Jinnah, the founder of Pakistan. Jinnah had reportedly wanted a country where the citizens would be treated equally regardless of their religion. But ever since the country adopted the Objectives Resolution in 1949, which declared the Constitution of Pakistan would be based on Islamic ideology, Muslims have always had the upper hand in the country.

As per reports, the letter to Imran Khan says that successive governments have ensured religious minorities would face political, economic and social discrimination as well as encouraging the growth of radical Islamic groups that would bring violence upon them. The reports of the letter come just after the United Nations listed Jaish chief Masood Azhar as a global terrorist.

Paradoxically, Pakistan is the only state that has declared Ahmadi Muslims as non-Muslims community. As a result, even they have faced religious persecution in a land that systematically supports Muslims.

The letter also draws attention to the Asia Bibi case, where a Christian woman was faced with blasphemy charges. The EU has said that the continued misuse of the Blasphemy laws and apathy to change them would imply that Pakistan was encouraging such persecutions.

Citing a report by Movement for Solidarity and Peace in Pakistan, the letter also brings up the issue of forced conversions. Reportedly, on average, over 1000 girls from Christian and Hindu communities have been kidnapped and forced to marry a Muslim every year.

The last concern raised by the letter was the rise of religious extremists groups that have unleashed their violence upon the minorities and their places of worship, with the support of the state of Pakistan.

As reported by ANI, the EU reminds Pakistan that the continued religious oppression of minorities violates the UN treaty of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) which is the foundation of Internation Convent on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). The EU warns Pakistan that unless an assurance is given that the country would effectively implement the Convention, all subsidies and trade preferences would be suspended.

The Members of Parliament have urged Pakistan to dismantle all constitutional and institutional structures that have resulted in the persecution of minorities if the country wishes to remain as a beneficiary of the European Union General Scheme of Preference Plus (GSP+). Abiding by the ICCPR is prerequisite for the GSP+ status.

It is also notable here that Pakistan has been put in the FATF grey list for its continued support to terrorist groups and failure to take strict measure against terrorist organisations based on its soil.

Love Jihad is not a figment of the ‘right wing’ imagination, it is a real and present danger

“Love Jihad”, also known as “Romeo Jihad” in some countries, is a strategy of luring vulnerable girls to convert to Islam by feigned love. Instead of genuine marital bliss, these girls get trapped in a web of deceit and frequently end up in the hands of Islamic extremist organizations. This phenomenon has been dismissed by the self-proclaimed “liberals” as a figment of the “right-wing” imagination. However, what is the truth? Does Love Jihad truly exist?

A review of some such cases in news points to a fixed pattern and modus operandi of the perpetrators.

  • National level shooter Tara Shadeo from Ranchi, Jharkhand complained that she married Ranjit Kohli as per Hindu rituals who turned out to be Raqibul Hasan Khan. After the wedding, he insisted on having a Nikaah and tortured her to accept Islam
  • National level Taekwondo player from Kanpur, UP complained that she was cheated by a man who introduced himself as “Raja”. He turned out to be Mohammed Waseem who had concealed his religion to lure her and then forced her for conversion and Nikaah. Her identity was withheld, she was a minor (only 14 years old) at the time of the incident
  • Girl from Bareilly, UP reported that she met “Golu” in a gym who was sporting a “Tilak” on the forehead and “Kalaawa” (Hindu sacred thread) on the wrist. He turned out to be Aamir who started forcing her to accept Islam and eat beef before marrying her
  • A girl from Shamli, UP reported that a man approached her on Facebook under a forged Hindu name, spiked her drink, made her obscene video and blackmailed her into marrying him. He later tried selling her to human traffickers
  • Subhologna Chakraborty from West Bengal was getting ready for court marriage with someone whose real name turned out to be Sheikh Sultan. When Family called off the wedding, he shot Subhologna dead and injured both her parents

In 2009, Kerala High Court confirmed the signs of “love jihad”; the court’s statement mentioned the following observations –

  • during the last four years, 3,000 to 4,000 religious conversions have taken place after love affairs
  • involving converting girls from other religions to Islam after enticing them to marry Muslim boys
  • police reports indicated a ‘concerted’ effort to convert girls of a particular religion to another with the ‘blessings of some outfits’
  • fundamentalist outfits like National Democratic Front (NDF) and Campus Front have roots in college campuses in various cities
  • there were indications of “forceful” religious conversions under the guise of “love”, the Kerala State High Court recommended the government to consider enacting a law to prohibit such “deceptive” acts

In 2016, the National Investigation Agency (NIA) had also confirmed that there’s a pattern to convert Hindu girls and get them married to Muslim men.

In 2016, many women in Kerala approached Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan asking for help to track down their young daughters who had disappeared after marrying young Muslim men and then being converted to Islam.

Bindu, the mother of a girl in Kerala reported that her daughter was lured by a young Muslim man, got married and converted to Islam. After a few months, Bindu was told that her daughter was pregnant but the communication was irregular. One day, the daughter called her mother to tell her that she was in Sri Lanka. The next thing was a call from Afghanistan followed by a long silence. It was then that Bindu approached the Chief Minister.

Police suspected that this girl had gone over with her husband to Syria to join the Islamic State. A local TV channel tracked down at least five more families, with a similar story like that of Bindu, mostly from Malappuram.

In 2017, in the same Malappuram, media house India Today conducted a sting operation on Popular Front of India (PFI), a charitable organization (based in Malappuram) and frequently accused of conducting illegal religious conversions to Islam.

Zainaba, President of Women’s Wing of PFI mentioned in front of the camera that all such allegations were baseless, nobody could compel such conversions or convert people from one religion to another.

However, when she thought that camera was off, she admitted to proselytizing about 5,000 non-Muslim women into Islam. She also explained how conversion centres have to be disguised as charitable or educational establishments in order to prevent any backlash from RSS and explained their modus operandi in detail.

Screen Grab from India Today Sting Operation

Ahmed Shareef, the founding member of PFI talked about patriotic stuff including India’s freedom struggle in front of the camera. When he thought that the camera was off, he talked about how their goal was first to convert India into the Islamic State and then the entire world. He also talked about receiving funds from the Middle East for their mission.

Screen Grab from India Today Sting Operation

A detailed report on the above operation is accessible on the India Today website. The report also contains a 10 minutes video of a sting operation that shows the above conversations. Alternatively, one can also watch the full 50 minutes show on this sting operation on the website of India Today or on YouTube.

2018 report in The Pioneer mentioned about cases where “love” is used as a trap to lure girls into forced religious conversions or sexual abuse or both. India has more or less chosen to ignore the issue because of its sensitivity but other countries including the UK are also facing the same. This seems true as the British newspapers from way back in 2007 also reported about –

  • Police rescuing girls from forced conversions to Islam
  • recruiters from radical Islamic groups being paid about £5000 for each successful mission
  • recruiters “stepping up aggressive conversion tactics, especially around universities”
British Newspapers Evening Standard and Metro on Romeo Jihad

This is not to say that all inter-faith marriages are fake. However, it must be understood that the existence of radical Islamic elements who use deception and proselytizing as a means of expanding their religion is real.

Aberrations like rape or violence may be unwanted anomalies in any civil society but they happen and need to be addressed anyway. Similarly, love-jihad may be perpetrated by only a few individuals and organizations but it does happen.

It’s high time that governments and authorities started addressing it like any other real social issue instead of burying their heads in the sand, pretending that it doesn’t happen, engaging in political correctness driven by the fear of offending Muslims or summarily dismissing it as a fake narrative by Hindu Nationalists.

Congress leaders, including Digvijay Singh and Kamal Nath have a meltdown after UN ban on Masood Azhar

In what could be seen as a major diplomatic coup for India, the mastermind of the Pathankot terrorist attack and head of Jaish-e-Mohammed, Masood Azhar, has been designated as a global terrorist in the United Nations Sanctions List.

While this triumph is being celebrated by all level headed citizens of India, it has thrown the begrudging Congress party loyalists completely off balance. Senior party leader Digvijay Singh questioned, “How will listing Masood Azhar as a global terrorist help when the Pakistan Prime Minister is flaunting his friendship with Modiji.

It will be significant to mention here that it is, in fact, the Congress, who, due to their sheer love for the neighbouring country, has been echoing Pakistan’s rhetorics for all this while. Even after the Balakot airstrikes, the statements of Congress leaders, including its president Rahul Gandhi, had found endorsements, even official support from Pakistan.

In fact, Digvijay Singh’s comments against the Modi government, and in turn the mistrust by him in the Indian Armed forces by calling ‘Modi a liar’ and asking the government to provide proof of the Balakot strike, had provided enough substance to the Pakistani media to build fictional narratives to attack India with.

And moreover, Digvijay justifying the heinous act executed by Pakistan, calling the Pulwama attack an ‘accident’ too had given the nation a glimpse of Congress’ endearment towards the terrorist state.

Not only has the Congress at several instances exhibited more trust in the neighbouring country than its own, but it also has, in fact, on different occasions expressed its unfading love for terrorists. Congress President Rahul Gandhi had once showered immense respect and affection for the terror organisation Jaish-e-Mohammad’s chief, Masood Azhar by referring to him as Masood ‘jee’.

Earlier, Congress leader Digvijaya Singh had referred to Osama Bin Laden as ‘Osama jee’.

However, Digvijay Singh is just one amongst the spattering, spiteful, squad, who get unnerved by any success scored by Modi.

Another usual suspect, Congress’ Kamal Nath, who also could not tolerate another feather in the Modi government’s cap, expressed uncertainty on whether the designation of Jaish chief, Masood Azhar as a ‘global terrorist’ had anything to do with the ongoing Lok Sabha elections.


Apart from them, the so-called ‘Neutral’ journalists and assorted public celebrities who were until yesterday calling it Modi’s failure in getting Azhar listed are suddenly disparaging the Indian government’s achievement. The hypocrisy was noticed by many on Twitter.


India has been making relentless efforts towards designating Azhar as a global terrorist but China had thwarted every move thus far. Back in 2009, India had moved a proposal to ban Azhar. In 2016 again, India moved a similar proposal with the P3 (the United States, the United Kingdom, and France) in the UN’s 1267 Sanctions Committee to ban Masood Azhar, at the wake of the 2016 attack on India’s Pathankot by JeM terrorists.

The P3 nations had moved a similar proposal again in 2017. However, on all occasions, the proposal had been blocked by China, a veto-wielding member of the UNSC. However, due to the aggressive foreign policy, Modi has pursued against terror during his first term as Prime Minister, China has finally withdrawn its opposition.

Congress and their bandwagon are getting more and more frustrated as several are attributing this significant achievement to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’ adept foreign diplomacy and his governance. However, considering how India for decades, has tried to accomplish the same but has finally achieved success under Modi’s regime, it will be only just, to credit this significant development to him.

When PM Modi’s roadshow caused heart burn inside (and among) the ‘left-liberal’ ecosystem

Prime Minister Narendra Modi filed his nomination in Banaras for the ongoing Lok Sabha elections a few days ago. His nomination filing process received widespread coverage as the entire nation had its eyes on him. However, a day prior to this, he conducted a mega road show in the city of temples and was welcomed by a sea of people to thunderous applause, and chants of ‘Modi-Modi’ across the stretch of his route. The roadshow was covered across the media by almost every news channel. Roadshows or nomination rallies these days are seen as a show of strength for contesting candidates.

Liberals were seen shedding tears of joy when a similar crowd had turned up for Kanhaiya Kumar in Begusarai, to shower their love on the CPI candidate. The show of green colour during Rahul Gandhi’s roadshow in Wayanad was hailed as Gandhi’s and Congress’ presence amongst the people of the south.

However, the moment PM Modi held a roadshow in Banaras, everybody from their fraternity seems to lose their minds! What was so different in Banaras that the entire liberal cabal went bonkers in a jiffy? Oh well, in Banaras, a special person, who happens to be the current Prime Minister was waving to the cheering crowd from his car. In Banaras, the flags of the saffron-party, the BJP were seen fluttering gloriously. In Banaras, it appeared as if Hindu symbols had taken over. In Banaras, winds of hope and of reviving Hindu civilization, which was, until now falsified for political gains, were blowing.

These winds seemed to carry a subtle message of the saffron surge that had ignited the hearts of many people. These hearts were overcome with despair upon gauging the direction of these winds. PM Modi’s roadshow had hit the bullseyes by instigating this heartburn.

BJP is not to be underestimated anymore. Of late, the saffron party has been organizing a number of events to showcase its strength to the masses. This is causing frustration to the so-called intellectuals and ‘Pak Occupied Patrakaars‘ who have ganged up together. Events like these force them to shed their cloaks and expose their true colours.

Why do liberals, Kaampanthis and the samudaay vishesh of journalism get burns by Modi’s saffron? What is so negative about it? Nothing, except of course the fact that the colour of his crowd is not green. Unfortunately for them, the fire of their hatred in, which they seem to burn all the time also has a colour. That too ‘lagbhag’ saffron.

Hope you all remember the times, when politicians across party lines, would wear skull caps in the rat race to appear more Muslim than the Muslims themselves. Hamid Ansari and Najeeb Jung would chill out without their skull caps on, while Arvind Kejriwal would roam around donning the skull cap as if he had just arrived from Mecca. Mamata Banerjee too would raise her hands in dua and murmur as if she were reciting the verses from the Quran. However, the people Banerjee visited did not need her display of theatrics.

In reality, such politicians have nothing to do with Muslims, their religion or welfare. Such antics do not qualify as secularism either. Nor does it assure standing up for the minority rights. It was a mere formality, an obligation to please the Muslims. For ages, the Muslim community has believed political parties that talk about their interests and sport their religious symbols.

Had any such political party actually done something concrete for Muslims, then this community would not be suffering across social indicators today? Their women would not be tolerating insults under the garb of evil social practices that have been rejected in Islamic countries like Pakistan and Turkey. Alas! Muslims understand this very well but fall prey to such political gimmicks even today. Their Imams still command the authority to appeal to them to vote in large numbers to a particular politician, a specific political party et al, and they still oblige!

Anyway, let’s talk about Modi and the crowd that was seen in Benaras. Benaras and Patliputra are the two oldest surviving and continuously thriving ancient cities in the world today. Unlike some of the oldest known cities, the settlements here have not disappeared. These cities are inhabited since the beginning of civilization.

Modi contested from Benaras in 2014 and won with a thumping majority. He is contesting again. Since his victory, he has made efforts to rejuvenate the city, which is proof enough that he doesn’t aim to rejuvenate the city alone but Sanatan Asmita, history and culture as well. The Ganga, Kashi Vishwanath and the son of the soil Mahamana represent the continuity of its unrivalled history to its present. Modi’s efforts are a tribute to the vast glory of this ancient city.

Within 15-seconds of Modi’s roadshow, the left-liberal ecosystem must have realized that his governance has worked effectively, slowly but consistently, to break the spine of anti-Hindu narrative during his 5-year tenure. Like that of Andy Dufrence in Shawshank Redemption! So when their intolerance raga, raga Modi ghrina failawat, raga berozgari vyaapt, raga notebandi mritak, raga GST dukaanbandi etc failed to incite any rage, they were still thinking of creating a wave against the ruling regime. But this too fell flat as they figured out his government had already rescued the Sanatan Asmita from the shackles of Communist ideology hiding behind the poster of Raquel Welch.

When Modi waved his hand, stopped to accept a shawl offered by an elderly citizen, the entire route reverberated with chants of his name, it no longer was a plain roadshow. It transcended to become those drops of water that fell on Andy Dufrence’s head. The purity, and the calm, which was evident on his face after getting his freedom. The rose petals showered on Modi was a gesture of gratitude by his people for releasing the Sanatan faith from the clasp of these intellectual vultures.

Looking at the crowd in his roadshow, some drew unworthy parallels to that of Hitler and Nazis of Germany in lieu of their interpretation of Hilter, a popular leader running a majority government. This comparison exposed their sick and wicked mentality. If one becomes a Hitler by merely attracting crowds to his rally, then what about the similar crowds that are seen during rallies of Lalu Prasad Yadav, Mamata Banerjee, and Congress? In fact, the situation in Mamata’s Bengal and Lalu’s Bihar resembles close to a violent dictatorship regime.

Some were concerned about the politicization of the Hindu faith. Dear Champu! Policisation of faith happens when you throw a beef party, make an unsuccessful attempt to blend in by wearing a skull cap in an iftaar party despite being a Hindu and also when you have a problem with the head of the nation visiting a temple but not with Rahul Gandhi wearing janeu during his temple runs.

If such people and the ones whom they appease lack public support, then this is not Modi’s problem. You are free to borrow crowds if you can. Who has stopped you? The whole country witnessed green colour with moons and stars surging on the streets of Wayanad. But did we say the colour was representing a symbol of politicization of faith?

Faith is both personal, as well as collective. The Consitution bestows on us, the right to choose our religion and practice it with freedom. Modi’s act of doing Ganga Aarti is in his personal capacity as well as the collective faith of crores of Hindus who have chosen him to represent them. The ‘interest’ here implies the acts of previous governments to systematically falsify Hindu Gods and temples, distort history and texts and fabricate research papers to crop up the existence of a mosque in Ayodhya. We were all the while false fed about the existence of two races- Aryans and Dravidians, and the 5000-year old myth of Dalit atrocities.

A great but baseless conspiracy was hatched. It had no basis but they kept on repeating it as to run their propaganda. So much so that the then Prime Minister Manmohan Singh went on to say that Muslims have the first right over the resources of this country. But why? How did he draw such a conclusion? What about secularism then or does ‘Muslim appeasement only’ mean being secular? Because of such antics, it irks this jamaat when Modi addresses the deprived, the poor, and the homeless. He cut across caste and religious lines by giving the economically derived a 10% reservation. This is how he has delivered social justice in true sense.

This saffron colour is not to scare anyone. Ayodhya’s Diwali is not for threatening anyone. Were Iftaar parties held to scare anyone? Absolutely not. The leaders who felt that they should attend those parties, so they did. Some leader felt that a certain religious population would vote for her if she offers prayers like them so she covered her head with her saree, closed her eyes and raised her hand in dua.

This is not to scare anyone. No Hitler has arrived. This is the land of Hindus, people here are all inclusive, they are promoters of tolerance and love. So much so that our ancestors offered shelter to Islamic invaders, Islamic rapists, and other foreign assassins. How many more examples do you want? Can such tolerant and peace-loving people scare anyone? Our community is gripped with a special kind of fear during our festivals, so how can we scare anyone?

We have even named our cities after notorious invaders like Bakhtiyar Khilji, who set ablaze our treasure, The Nalanda University. We allowed generations of these invaders to enslave us for centuries and settle here with us. Why should anyone fear us then?

During the PM’s roadshow, his followers were waving the flags, that’s all. Our flags have been here for ages. These flags were torn apart by invaders, yet continued their existence in harmony. By restoring the glorious name of Prayagraj, I see no threat!

Islamic terrorists, rapists, and invaders had discovered a novel way of wiping our culture. All they had to do is attack our faith, burn our literature and manipulate the history. Today, we are only reclaiming what belongs to us, in its original form, within the constitutional realm.

This saffron crowd that liberals are whining about had come to catch a glimpse of their beloved leader. Amongst this crowd, were few dead souls that have been revived by the Sanjeevani of Modi. The crowd in this roadshow hopes to reclaim the glory of our golden history through the power of voting.

There is no reason to be jealous of this crowd. Better still, make the efforts to earn the love of these people. The beauty of Sanatan Dharam allows even a sinner to attain mukti. Every Pak Occupied Patrakaars, member of samudaay vishesh of journalism, leaders of the left-liberal mob, politicians wearing Muslim skull caps for appeasement too have a chance to attain Moksha. Provided they visit the holy land of Benaras, deboard at the railway station, bow down at the ghats of Ganga, and apologize to her saying, “We will no longer behave like retards, we will not be chirkuts anymore.”

This article is a translation of this Hindi article. The translation has been done by Aditi Singh.