Home Blog Page 3040

The victim narrative: How July 13 became ‘Martyrs Day’ in Kashmir, to celebrate Islamists, after horrific acts of cruelty were executed against Hindus

Instilling hostility in the Kashmiri mindset has been well achieved by employing the narrative war—the Kashmiri victim narrative—that carries on unabatedly in the Kashmir valley. The voices of all legitimate stakeholders have been muffled by this false narrative, which has also tainted history and created new, fictitious legends. The false feeling of victimisation coupled with violent Islamism, causes Kashmiri Muslims to regard everyone else as outsiders. One such persistent myth that has been debunked by the Modi government is the recognition of “Martyr’s Day” on July 13.

For those who are unaware, July 13 has been recognised as a state holiday from 1947 to 2019 to honour the 22 rioters who were shot to death by security forces after thousands of Kashmiri Muslims wreaked havoc in the Srinagar town and surrounding regions. On July 13, 1931, Jammu & Kashmir witnessed the first organised sectarian bloodbath in contemporary Kashmir history, and horrific acts of cruelty were executed against Hindus in the wake. However, this public holiday made no mention of the intentional atrocities carried out against the Dogra community and other Hindus in the valley.

In this piece, we’ll look at how July 13 is actually a black day for Kashmiri Hindus. We will look at how the gradual process of democratisation, which had been planned and started by a righteous ruler, Maharaja Hari Singh, was purposefully halted, as well as how the seeds of hatred against the Dogra community were sown under the false pretence of an anti-monarchy movement that saw the call to “Quit Kashmir.”

Setting the pretext of the 1931 carnage

Maharaja Hari Singh was the independent ruler of Jammu and Kashmir in 1931. He was in charge of Ladakh, Gilgit-Baltistan, Muzaffarabad-Mirpur, Aksai Chin, and Saksham Valley. He was a contemporary figure of his time who was committed to eradicating social injustice, ignorance, and inequality from the state. He was understandably reluctant to lease the Gilgit territory to the British, despite their requests. The British were aware of his vulnerability, namely that he was an unusual Hindu king ruling over a largely Muslim population.

The British planned to do something to achieve what they wanted. It was then the British intelligence brought Abdul Qadeer, a provocateur from Peshawar who was an Ahmadi, into Srinagar while posing as a cook for a local British living there. Additionally, Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah, an Aligarh Muslim University dropout, was also brought in.

At a public gathering at the Shah-e-Hamdaan Khanqah Mohalla, propagandist Abdul Qadeer delivered a fanatical speech. He made considerable use of the Quran to incite Muslims to rebel against the Maharaja. He promoted communal animosity and inflamed hatred by asserting that Muslims are forbidden by the Qur’an from surrendering to an infidel Hindu monarch. Additionally, he encouraged people to slaughter cows, which was illegal, just to humiliate Hindus.

Qadeer was arrested on accusations of crimes against the state. The arrest of Qadeer was met with outrage. Later, attempts were made to repeatedly disrupt his trial. It was subsequently decided that his trial would take place in the prison itself. It was in this way the premise for a massacre was created. What followed was merciless killing and torture of Hindus and conversion to Islam.

13th July 1931

As written in the book, The Warning From Kashmir, “Among the flotsam and jetsam heaved up by the agitation against the State and the Hindus was a man called Abdul Qadeer.” It was Abdul Qadeer who was the originator of all the problems and made speeches that were “calculated to worsen the already embittered relations between the communities.”

Here are some excerpts from the book narrating the scene on July 13, 1931.

“The hearing in jail fell on 13th July. On that day, a mob stormed the jail and demanded admittance along with the Sessions Judge. When the Judge had passed the gates, the crowd also attempted to get in. The other gates had been forced and the inner gates were attacked. At the suggestion of the Judge, two Muslim lawyers, representing the accused, harangued the visitors to go out of the Jail precincts. Finding that there was no possibility of ingress, the crowd went out and started stoning officials and set fire to the police lines. The police force was then called in. All efforts to pacify the unruly mob proved futile.”

“The District Magistrate’s order was defied, who had been summoned to the spot by the time and had declared the crowd to be an “unlawful assembly” and ordered its dispersal. The order was defied and finding that the mob could neither be pacified nor dispersed, the District Magistrate directed fire to be opened. The crowd fell off but later it re-assembled and resumed stoning. It had to be dispersed with a Lathi charge. Part of the crowd, however, moved towards the Hari Parbat Fort: the cavalry had to pursue it and disperse it again. A section of the recalcitrants proceeded towards a place called Maharaj Ganj which is a business locality and loots over an extensive area followed. From Bhori Kadal to Alikadal a long stretch, Hindu shops were raided. Other localities such as Safakadal, Ganji, Khud and Nawakadal too formed the centres of loot. Bazar streets were littered with property, books of accounts were burnt: the Hindu shopkeepers were molested, in short, pandemonium prevailed.” (Page no: 87)

The book mentions that Hindu merchants lost goods worth lakhs of rupees. A British officer Mr Wakefield stated that the looted items were so dispersed across the streets that his vehicle was unable to pass through. He also stated that not a single Muslim notified him about the looters’ attack on their properties.

The most ‘extraordinary’ part of the episode, according to the book, was that almost simultaneously with the events in Srinagar, there was an uprising in Vicharnag, some 5 or 6 miles off. Untold horrors have been done there, with “men owning lakhs reduced to indigence and women subjected to the worst possible and most indecent assaults.” A military force was dispatched to the location, but the destruction had already been inflicted. The ambuscade also claimed the lives of Hindus elsewhere. Some people died, and many more were injured. Random assaults persisted for a long time. (Page no: 87-88)

The misconception that it was a “democratic” rebellion to overthrow the reigning “feudal” rule is a farce peddled to support the narrative and instigate a false sense of victimisation among the Kashmiri Muslims. It was actually an Islamist uprising against Hindu rule. The horror of July 13, 1931, lasted for weeks and months and also caused mayhem in remote Rajouri, Kotli, and Mirpur. Because the Vikrami almanack is 57 years ahead of the CE, the year 1931 is in the common recollection of Hindu refugees from Mirpur as “Atthassi na Shaurash” – the massacres of 88.

According to Yuv Raj Gupta, an octogenarian who fled Kotli and now lives in Jammu, “Innocents were mercilessly killed and many were converted to Islam forcibly. Religious places of worship, of Hindus and Sikhs, that is. temples and Gurudwaras, all met with the same fate. Many were completely damaged and desecrated. In other few cases, though buildings were not damaged, the sacred idols and holy books, including the Guru Granth Sahib, were badly damaged burnt and desecrated. These happenings known as “88 NA SHAURASH” (Riots of 1988 Bikram or 1931 Christian Era) are still in the memory of not only the survivors of that time but also of their subsequent generations, and the refugees of 1947, scattered throughout India and awaiting Rehabilitation.”

The myth of the ‘freedom struggle’ of Kashmiris against Dogra rule

Again, the narrative that the July 13 violence in 1931 Kashmir was a ‘freedom struggle’ is part of an effort to instil a sense of victimisation and convince Muslims that Maharaja Hari Singh was suppressing them. Maharaja Hari Singh, however, was a contemporary king committed to eliminating illiteracy, societal problems, and inequity in the state. He had inherited the highest position in a monarchy at a time when the institution itself was under scrutiny.

Despite having full authority as a result of his royal status, Maharaja Hari Singh was aware of the changing circumstances and worked to progressively democratise the system. His administration was founded on the principles of social justice and equality. His style of administration was crystal obvious in his legendary coronation speech, in which he stated, “For me, all communities, religions, and races are equal. All religions are mine, and justice is my religion.”

Maharaja Hari Singh had already earned the trust of the populace thanks to his effective management of the Valley’s catastrophic food shortage in 1921–1922. His actions succeeded in preventing famine. His reputation for being fair to everybody in the community kept him popular. The Agriculturists Relief Regulations of July 1926, one of his first measures, was intended to free farmers from the predatory grip of moneylenders. This reform aimed to liberate farmers from the control of the moneylending elite and eradicate the starvation and disease that afflicted them.

Maharaja Hari Singh focused his efforts on the struggle against illiteracy in order to establish socioeconomic equality since he was well aware that education was the key to social upward mobility. Education advanced everywhere, and the Maharaja in particular promoted Urdu as a teaching language to engage the Muslim populace. Due to his contemporary education and exposure, Maharaja Hari Singh became committed to the cause of social equality, which included women.

Maharaja Hari Singh was the king of the masses. Untouchability was eliminated, and Dalits were allowed to enter temples. As did the Dogra Maharajas before him, he went to the mosque to congratulate the Muslim countrymen on Eid and believed that all religions are equal.

Vilifying a progressive thinker like Maharaja Hari Singh and honouring the murders of rioters who plundered shops and raped women exposes the intentions of the ones, who fomented dissension in society and labelled an Islamist rebellion against a Hindu ruler as a “freedom struggle.”

Another betting racket busted: UP-based cons ran a fake T20 cricket tournament live-streamed on YouTube, 2 persons arrested

Days after the elaborate betting racket in Gujarat that duped money from Russian punters over a fake IPL was busted, another racket with a similar modus operandi has been exposed in UP. As per reports, the UP Police have busted a betting racket in Hapur district where the accused persons ran a fake T20 tournament named “Big Boss T20 Punjab League”.

Speaking to the media, Deepak Bhuker, SP Hapur has informed that 2 persons have been arrested for running a betting racket that worked via a fake T20 series named “Big Boss T20 Punjab League”. He added that through a software, the accused had even live-streamed matches on YouTube.

A person named Ashok Chaudhary, who is located in Russia’s Moscow, reportedly provided the accused with all equipment. The accused used a mobile app named ‘Cric heroes’ to take bets, the SP informed. He added that the mastermind Ashok used to pay Rishabh, one of the arrested accused a sum between Rs 40,000 to Rs 50,000 for every match. The players who participated in the ruse were also paid.

The police are investigating the issue further.

Fake IPL in Gujarat targeted Russian punters

Recently, a fake ‘IPL’ racket was busted in Gujarat where a group of villagers were hired to pose as players and an elaborate series was planned where the farm labourers and villagers played with the IPL team jerseys. The fraudulent tournament had reached its “knockout quarterfinal” stage before the organisers of the “Indian Premier League Tournament” were arrested by the police.

The racket had even hired a commentator who had mimicked Harsha Bhogle, and they used audio of stadium noise downloaded from YouTube. The fake IPL was also streamed live on YouTube and the Gujarat villagers accepted bets from Russians based out of Tver, Voronezh and Moscow. They even had high-resolution cameras for the con.

Uttar Pradesh Government constitutes SIT to investigate cases related to AltNews co-founder Mohammed Zubair

The Uttar Pradesh government has formed a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to look into all the accusations against Alt News co-founder Mohammad Zubair. Over half a dozen FIR under various sections of the Indian Penal Code have been filed against Mohammed Zubair for his defamatory comments against Hindu seers, hurting religious sentiments by sharing disparaging posts against Hindu Gods, and making critical remarks against News anchors among other things.

The SIT has been headed by IG Preetinder Singh. DIG Amit Kumar Verma has also made a part of the SIT. Mohammad Zubair is facing charges in Uttar Pradesh’s Sitapur, Lakhimpur Kheri, Ghaziabad, Hathras, and Muzaffarnagar.

UP govt constitutes SIT to probe allegations against Mohammed Zubair

The government’s directive to form the SIT comes in the backdrop of the Supreme Court extending the interim bail granted to Alt News co-founder Mohammed Zubair until further orders in the case filed in the Sitapur district of Uttar Pradesh. Zubair, however, would remain in Delhi Police custody in connection with another case filed against him.

On June 1, Khairabad Police of Sitapur district in Uttar Pradesh filed a First Investigation Report (FIR) against Alt News co-founder Mohammed Zubair for using derogatory language against Mahant Bajrang Muni Udasin, Rashtriya Sanrakshak of Rashtriya Hindu Sher Sena along with Yati Narsinghanand and Swami Anand Swaroop. The FIR was registered based on the complaint of Bhagwan Sharan, district head of Rashtriya Hindu Sher Sena, under sections 295(A) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000.

Another case has also been registered against him by the Delhi Police for allegedly hurting religious sentiments and promoting enmity through his tweet made in 2018. Zubair had been denied bail by Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Snigdha Sarvaria in this particular case on July 2. The court will hear another bail plea on July 14 in this case.

In addition to these two cases, Zubair is also facing charges in a case filed against him in UP’s Lakhimpur Kheri. Only yesterday, (Monday, July 11), the Alt News co-founder and alleged ‘fact checker’ was sent to 14-day judicial custody by the Mohammadi Session Court in the case filed against him in the Lakhimpur Kheri district of Uttar Pradesh. Additional charges under the Indian Penal Code (IPC), including Sections 153B, 501(1)(B) and 505(2), are pressed against Mohammed Zubair.

Lawrence Bishnoi confesses to plotting to kill Salman Khan; says he had bought a Rs 4 lakh rifle to murder him

On Tuesday, gangster Lawrence Bishnoi revealed to the Police that he had planned to kill Bollywood actor Salman Khan in the year 2018. Bishnoi, who is being questioned in connection with the assassination of popular singer Sidhu Moosewala also said that he had bought a special rifle worth Rs 4 lakhs to murder Khan.

According to the reports, Bishnoi told the cops that he wanted to kill Salman Khan because of the 1998 Chinkara poaching case in Rajasthan’s Jodhpur, which occurred during the filming of the movie named Hum Saath Saath Hain. During interrogation, Bishnoi reportedly stated that Chinkara, or blackbucks, are sacred to the Bishnoi community in Haryana, Rajasthan, and Punjab.

Khan was convicted to five years in prison by a Jodhpur court in April 2018 for murdering two blackbucks in October 1998. The actor has appealed his conviction. Khan was first detained in the Jodhpur jail in connection with the case but was subsequently transferred to the Bharatpur jail.

During his questioning, Bishnoi reportedly admitted to having sent texts to his colleague Sampat Nehra, who was from Rajgarh, requesting that Salman Khan be killed. Nehra was absconding in other instances at the time. Lawrence Bishnoi also informed the police that Sampat Nehra was sent to Mumbai to assassinate Salman Khan and undertook a reconnaissance of the actor’s home. According to Bishnoi, Nehra only possessed a pistol and no long-distance fire weapon, thus he could attack Khan from a distance.

The mobster then ordered an RK Spring rifle from a guy named Dinesh Dagar, according to sources, who added that the gun cost Rs 4 lakh. According to reports, the money was paid to Anil Pandey, a Dagar colleague. This rifle was later recovered in 2018 from Dagar’s possession.

On July 6, Hasti Mal Saraswat, a lawyer defending Salman Khan in the blackbuck poaching case, said that the Lawrence Bishnoi gang had threatened him with murder. In his lawsuit, Saraswat stated that a threat letter was discovered on July 3 on a door knob of the High Court’s Jubilee Chamber, which houses attorneys’ offices. According to the lawsuit, the letter had the initials of Lawrence Bishnoi and his aide Goldy Brar. It stated that the lawyer will face the same death as Sidhu Moosewala, adding that an ‘enemy’s friend is their first enemy’.

Last month, three members of the Lawrence Bishnoi gang were claimed to have delivered a letter threatening Salman Khan and his father Salim Khan. The letter allegedly threatened Salman Khan and his father with the same fate as Moosewala, who was assassinated in broad daylight on May 29 in Punjab’s Mansa.

Amid the Goa Congress crisis, Rahul Gandhi vanishes again for a secret foreign trip: Each time the party faces trouble, the prince goes on a holiday

On Tuesday, Rahul Gandhi, the former Congress president and Wayanad Lok Sabha MP departed the nation for an overseas trip. The Congress party revealed that Gandhi took a trip today and will be returning to India by Sunday, July 17. However, it was unclear if the Congress leader was on a personal or official vacation when he left. The destination was likewise unknown at the time.

According to the reports, Gandhi boarded the trip at a crucial time when the grand old party is facing a probable split in its Goa section. While taking action against politicians engaging in anti-party actions, the Goa Congress unit ousted Michael Lobo from his post as the state’s opposition leader on Sunday.

Also, Congress President Sonia Gandhi urged Mukul Wasnik, a party legislator, to travel to the coastal state and see the changes. As usual, the Congress has blamed the BJP for it. The BJP has denied any role in the situation while asserting that Congress is in charge of selecting its MLAs.

Reportedly, this is not the first time that Gandhi has left the party alone to address the issues. Earlier in May, an undated video of the Wayand MP partying with a woman in a Kathmandu nightclub had gone viral. Netizens had taken severe potshots at Gandhi for partying abroad while leaving Congress in a state of crisis. After also BJP’s criticism, the Congress had responded saying that Rahul had travelled to Nepal to attend the wedding of a friend.

In April 2022, after poll strategist Prashant Kishor had rejected Congress’ offer to join the party, Rahul Gandhi had become untraceable again. Reports mentioned that Gandhi had gone missing for over 10 days and had gone unreachable, leaving the party to act alone in action during the crisis.

Earlier in December 2021, the Wayanad MP had gone for a personal trip to Italy ahead of the campaigns and rallies for then-upcoming Assembly elections in five states scheduled for 2022. He had forced the party to postpone his already scheduled rally in Punjab and had flown to Italy for a ‘personal visit’.

Since the BJP took government in 2014, Congress has been troubled by Rahul Gandhi’s frequent absence from the state on significant occasions, making it nearly impossible for it to perform as the primary opposition party in an efficient manner.

The party leadership desperately tries to project Rahul Gandhi as the face of the party and files timely requests from its members formally requesting Rahul Gandhi to become the Congress president. However, the Congress prince has not shown any interest in taking up the party president position since he quit the post in 2019.

Just before Diwali 2021, Rahul Gandhi vanished again, reportedly to London. On November 5, it was reported that Gandhi was on a ‘long vacation’. He returned after almost a month, just before the winter session commenced in the Parliament. At that time, BJP took a dig at Gandhi and questioned his trip to London.

In September 2021, while the Congress party in Punjab was facing a crisis with Amarinder Singh’s resignation, the Gandhi family was vacationing in Shimla.

Gandhi is often seen as a full-time traveller than a politician. In December 2020, he left for Italy on the 136th foundation day of his party. His party leaders could not settle on one explanation and further made themselves a target of media questions. In October 2019, fifteen days before the assembly elections in Haryana and Maharashtra, Gandhi had left, reportedly for Bangkok.

Interestingly, Gandhi also has a history of skipping important party events. In November 2019, Congress had planned as many as 35 press conferences across the country against union govt’s policies, but Gandhi, who allegedly gave directions for the press conferences, skipped them himself.

In May 2019, before the counting of votes of the parliamentary elections, Rahul Gandhi skipped an important meeting held by UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi in which they had planned to decide on a PM candidate and flew to London for a holiday. From missing out on budget sessions in 2018 to vanishing from trips to Thailand, Cambodia, Myanmar, and Vietnam in 2015, the Congress leader seems more interested in travelling than showing support to his party. Not to forget, he had a history of skipping SPG security for his abroad visits.

It is notable here that Rahul Gandhi’s foreign visits are always shrouded in mystery. He never shares the news of travelling abroad in the media or never even shares pictures from his numerous foreign trips. In his current visit, Rahul Gandhi has flown to some unknown place and will be returning on July 17. Gandhi’s foreign visit also comes ahead of the Parliament’s Monsoon Session that is scheduled to begin on July 18. The Presidential Election will also be held on Monday, with counting slated to happen on July 21.

Udhav Thackeray loses his cool after Defence Minister Rajnath Singh greets him with “Assalamu Alaikum”: Reports

Former Maharashtra chief minister Uddhav Thackeray lost his cool after Defence Minister Rajnath Singh greeted him with “Assalamu Alaikum” over a phone call to seek support for NDA’s presidential candidate Droupadi Murmu, a report published in Maharashtra Times said.

As per the reports, Uddhav Thackeray spoke about the incident during his meeting with the remaining Shiv Sena MLAs at his residence at Matoshree. “We may have been a part of the Maha Vikas Aghadi alliance, but we have not relinquished on Hindutva,” Uddhav had reportedly said while recounting his call with Rajnath Singh in the meeting.

Uddhav Thackeray had on Tuesday called a meeting with the Shiv Sena MLAs still loyal to him at his residence Matoshree. The report said the meeting was attended by 30 to 35 members, although it did not reveal the names of the members present in the meeting at the Thackeray residence. During the meeting, Uddhav said he got a call from Union Minister Rajnath Singh, who is tasked with the responsibility of building consensus among the opposition parties for NDA’s presidential candidate.

However, Rajnath Singh’s greeting “Assalamu Alaikum’ raised the hackles of the former Maharashtra CM, who was reportedly taken aback by the Union Minister’s use of Arabic salutation to greet him. “Assalamu Alaikum” are Arabic words used by Muslims to greet each other. Hearing Rajnath Singh’s words, Uddhav Thackeray’s temper flared and he reportedly said, “Even though we were a part of the Maha Vikas Aghadi alliance, we have not given up Hindutva. You should keep this in mind.” 

As per the report, after Thackeray’s disapproval, Singh greeted him with “Jai Shri Ram”.

Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena accused of betraying Hindutva

It is worth noting that ever since Shiv Sena, under the leadership of Uddhav Thackeray, formed an unholy alliance with political rivals Congress and NCP after the 2019 Maharashtra Assembly elections, it has been accused of sacrificing Hindutva at the altar of the chief ministerial post.

The first signs of Shiv Sena dropping the Hindutva issue came to the fore when a Common Minimum Programme(CMP) was hashed out between the allies of the Maha Vikas Aghadi government. It appeared that in their thirst for power, Shiv Sena had given up on the Hindutva cause. In fact, there were speculations that the Congress and NCP wanted assurance from Shiv Sena that their Hindutva agenda is going to take a back seat once the government is formed.

After forming a government with NCP and Congress, Shiv Sena has drastically toned down its demand for a Bharat Ratna for the Hindutva ideologue and Freedom Fighter Veer Savarkar, indicating that Shiv Sena no longer champions the cause of Hindutva with the same intensity it once did. Reservations of up to 5 per cent for Muslims in Maharashtra were another such incident which demonstrated that Shiv Sena has abandoned the Hindutva cause.

Two and a half years after forming the government in Maharashtra, senior Shiv Sena leader Eknath Shinde and an overwhelming majority of the party MLAs mutinied against Uddhav Thackeray, citing the party’s betrayal of Hindutva. The rebellion resulted in the collapse of the Maha Vikas Aghadi government, after which Eknath Shinde became the chief minister of Maharashtra with the support of the BJP.

Uttar Pradesh: After 27 persons in auto, 7 people caught riding a bike for eating ice cream, video viral

The Uttar Pradesh Police was left stunned after it intercepted a man riding with six children on his two-wheeler bike in Uttar Pradesh’s Aurraiya district. The man was travelling on his two-wheeler bike and had made six children of different ages sit on it, two in front and four behind him on his bike. Neither the rider nor any of the children had helmets on.

The Police handed him a challan and warned him against repeating this mistake.

According to the reports, the man riding a motorbike with six children was intercepted by the police. When asked by the Police, the man said that he wanted to take the children to eat ice cream and that he had no other vehicle to incorporate all at a time. The man was not even wearing a helmet.

The Police handed him a challan and slammed him for putting the lives of children at risk. The officers also warned him to wear a helmet and asked him not to repeat the same mistake. Reports mention that the bike is registered in the name of Mobina Bano of Kanpur Dehat, as per a report by Bharat Samachar. The incident took place when the Police Officers were conducting a traffic awareness program in the Homeganj Bazar near Auraiya Kotwali.

A similar bizarre incident was reported yesterday when an autorickshaw in Uttar Pradesh’s Fatehpur was found carrying 27 passengers in his vehicle. The autorickshaw typically seats six people, but when it was halted by the Police, at least 27 people, including elderly and young passengers, were crammed inside, in addition to the driver. The footage was captured by a bystander who shared it on social media to make it viral. The over-speeding autorickshaw was stopped near the Bindki Kotwali area of Fatehpur. The vehicle has been seized.

The RSS has faced a ban from the Indian govt on multiple occasions, and has emerged stronger each time: Read details

With volunteers managing more than thirty organisations worldwide, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) is the largest voluntary organisation in the world. With just 15-20 young men and teens, Dr Keshav Baliram Hedgewar established RSS in 1925 on the auspicious day of Vijayadashami.

Six months after its founding, the RSS adopted its current name. On April 17, 1926, Dr Hedgewar called a session at his house to which 26 Swayamsevaks came. The organisation’s name was chosen after a protracted discussion in which everyone contributed ideas. Before the name “Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh” was chosen, several other names were put up.

The Sangh has frequently been characterised as a paramilitary group or as having political intentions by its political and intellectual foes. However, it has always been primarily a cultural organisation rather than a political one. By uniting the whole community and ensuring the continuation of Hindu Dharma, the Sangh seeks to lead the nation to grandeur. Its mission is to bring Bharat’s “Saravangeena Unnati” (overall development).

Even though there were several attempts, governments failed to quell the RSS’ sheer grit and determination in attaining its objectives. The RSS has been outlawed three times in the last 97 years: in 1948, 1975, and 1992. The organisation was outlawed in 1948 following the assassination of MK Gandhi, in 1975 during the Emergency, and in 1992 following the demolition of the illegal Babri structure in Ayodhya. It was on July 12, 1949, that the first ban on RSS was lifted after a span of 16 months.

RSS was declared unlawful in 1948

The Sangh was subjected to its first ban following Nathuram Godse’s shooting of MK Gandhi, which lasted from February 1948 until July 1949. MK Gandhi was shot by Nathuram Godse on January 30, 1948. Godse was once associated with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). MS Golwalkar, the then chief of the RSS, was jailed after Gandhi was killed, and the organization was declared illegal on February 4, 1948.

The RSS was declared unlawful by the government alleging that its members participated in violent acts, gathered illegal weapons, and incited others to violence, all of which went against the RSS’s stated goals and objectives. Golwalkar halted the RSS’s operations while dismissing the accusations and abiding by the law. He was freed six months later but interned in Nagpur.

Golwalkar wrote to Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru on August 11 and offered to cooperate with the government despite the “hasty and unbalanced action” RSS had received from individuals in positions of authority. Nehru was wise to submit Golwalkar’s letter to Sardar Patel for a response because Patel had warned “those in power in the Congress” against attempts to “crush” the nationalistic RSS in a speech he had given in Lucknow just before MK Gandhi’s death.

In his response to Golwalkar, Patel recalled his warm regard for the RSS and praised the young RSS volunteers who protected women and children and served society. In addition, he condemned them for encouraging “communalism”, which took MK Gandhi’s life, and for “burning vengeance” towards Muslims in order to exact revenge for “the sufferings of the innocent” Hindus. Nonetheless, Patel recommended RSS continue its “patriotic endeavour by joining and not opposing the Congress.” Surprisingly, Golwalkar did not receive this letter.

Golwalkar wrote to Patel and Nehru once more on September 24, 1948, pleading for the allegations and ban to be withdrawn since extensive nationwide searches and investigations had turned up no proof that the RSS was guilty. By way of RS Shukla (Premier, Central Provinces, and Berar), Patel responded on September 26 and forwarded his initial letter—which had not reached Golwalkar. Patel said that the ban has unanimous approval across all provinces, so “there must surely be some basis for it.” The RSS was urged by him to follow “the rules of the Congress.”

Golwalkar received a letter from a Prime Minister’s Office on September 27 stating that the Home Ministry had the discretion to revoke or extend the ban but that there was “a great deal of evidence” and that Golwalkar had already received a “note” from the U.P. government regarding “the evidence.” Golwalkar became upset on November 3 and vehemently denied receiving any “note,” daring the government to produce the crucial proof and punish the RSS. No evidence was presented in response to Golwalkar’s open challenge.

On November 13, the Home Secretary declined to revoke the ban, instead ordering Golwalkar to return to Nagpur. Golwalkar raged, claiming that such “arbitrary acts are fit with autocratic rule” and not in “a civilised state.” Refusing to leave Delhi, he asked Swayamsevaks that the suspended Shakas be restarted. Golwalkar was then arrested. Following his incarceration, the RSS launched a satyagraha on December 9.

According to S Gurumurthy, At that time, TR Venkatrama Shastri, the then president of the Servants of India Society and a former advocate general of Madras, intervened. In a meeting with Sardar Patel, he urged the latter to lift the embargo. As opposed to either “join the Congress” or “adopt the Congress rules,” the new argument in the ongoing talks was that the RSS functioned surreptitiously because it lacked a written constitution. The RSS constitution was then written and presented by Shastri. However, the negotiations failed.

On July 9, 1949, the government again refused to lift the ban, citing “fundamental differences.” Shastri then made the decision to make public the specifics of the important issues raised, one about the RSS chief’s authority to choose his successor and the other regarding minors in the organisation. Shastri further maintained that extending the ban was impossible because the charges against the RSS had been revealed to be false in certain instances and the allegations of their involvement in Gandhiji’s killing had been disproven.

The government was unable to present any compelling evidence against the RSS and because of this, the administration was gradually losing ground in this case. On July 12, 1949, the government finally decided to overturn the ban on RSS. Furthermore, the ban was lifted unconditionally. On September 14, 1949, in a written statement to the Bombay Legislative Assembly (Proceedings p2126), Home Minister Morarji Desai acknowledged that the ban on RSS was no longer regarded as essential; it was withdrawn unconditionally, and the RSS offered no undertaking.

RSS banned during the Emergency

During the Emergency (1975-77), the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh was outlawed for the second time. When Prime Minister Indira Gandhi declared a state of emergency in the country on the night of June 25, 1975, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh was one of the first organisations to be outlawed.

On July 4, 1975, the central government outlawed the RSS. Balasaheb Deoras, the RSS Sarsanghchalak, was arrested on June 30, 1975, at Nagpur railway station. Deoras was imprisoned at the Yerwada Prison near Pune. A number of key RSS officials, as well as thousands of Swayamsevaks, were also detained.

Nevertheless, the RSS was leading the fight against the Emergency on behalf of civil society with its thousands of Karyakartas, Swayamsevaks, and Pracharaks.

Deoras, who spearheaded this fight even while incarcerated, wrote twice to Prime Minister Indira Gandhi. He expressed his strong opposition to the defamation effort launched against the RSS under Gandhi’s direction in both letters. In his first letter, dated August 12, 1975, Deoras responded in-depth to the accusations brought against the RSS and made it quite obvious that the RSS would not submit to state coercion.

The RSS head wrote a second letter on November 10, 1975, asking Indira Gandhi to lift the organization’s ban so that its Swayamsevaks may start their organisational work, which would be extremely beneficial for the country. In 1977, the Emergency was declared to be over, and as a result, the RSS was no longer prohibited.

Ban on RSS after the demolition of the disputed Babri structure

On December 6, 1992, the RSS was banned for the third time, following the demolition of the disputed Babri structure in Ayodhya. The ban was withdrawn within 6 months and the RSS was cleared of all the fraudulent allegations levelled against it by the government, and it emerged considerably stronger.

Although the Sangh started as an organisation, its ultimate objective is for everyone and every traditional social institution—including family, community, profession, educational, and religious institutions—to be assimilated into its system. The Sangh’s goal is to organise Hindu society so that all of its institutions and people function harmoniously and co-operatively as a whole.

National Emblem on new parliament building: Dear ‘Liberals’, lions do have long, sharp teeth, whether you want to see them or not

On July 11, Prime Minister Narendra Modi unveiled the National Emblem cast on the roof of the New Parliament Building. The majestic 6.5 meters tall cast of the National Emblem is made of bronze and weighs around 9,500 KG. Located on the top of the Central Foyer of the New Parliament Building, the statue has a supporting structure that weighs around 6,500 KG.

As per the official statement, the concept sketch and process of casting the National Emblem went through eight different stages of preparation, from clay modelling and computer graphics to bronze casting and polishing.

Congressis and ‘Liberals’ find issues with of the ‘roar,’ ‘canine teeth,’ and ‘angry face’

As soon as the reports of the unveiling of the cast were made on social media, the usual suspects saw a great opportunity to criticize the cast for unrealistic reasons. Aandolanjeevi and Advocate Prashant Bhushan said the lion’s faces on the emblem had been changed from peaceful to angry. He said, “From Gandhi to Godse; From our national emblem with lions sitting majestically & peacefully; to the new national emblem unveiled for the top of the new Parliament building under construction at Central Vista; Angry lions with bared fangs. This is Modi’s new India!”

Source: Twitter

Congress leader Srinivas BV also pointed out the alleged change as if he is not aware that lions possess teeth and they do roar. He published two photographs of National Emblem where the lions were ‘not roarring’ in the first one but roaring in the second. He said, “What has been changed in the country since 1950 is visible in seeing old and new Ashoka Stambha.”

Source: Twitter

Actor and alleged activist Mona Ambegaonkar declared, “Changing the National Emblem is Treason.”

Source: Twitter

Congress worker Sanjay Bafna said, “Modi, It’s for you. Lion of Ashoka Pillar is not dreadful; it is calm… The new Parliament building Lion is furious… This is an insult to the Constitution and the national emblem.”

Source: Twitter

The National Emblem

The National Emblem is an adaptation of the Lion Capital of King Ashoka at Sarnath. The original Ashoka Stambha has four lions mounted back to back on a circular abacus. It rests on a bell-shaped lotus. It contains sculptures of an elephant, a horse, a bull, and a lion separated by Dharma Chakras. You can only see three lions mounted on the abacus with a Dharma Chakra in the centre, a bull on the right, and a horse on the left.

Source: kevinstandagephotography

This profile of the Lion Capital was adopted as the National Emblem of India on January 26, 1950. The bell-shaped lotus was omitted from the Ashok Stambha in the official adaptation as National Emblem. It also contains the motto Satyameva Jayate written in Devanagari script below the profile of the Lion Capital, which means ‘Truth Alone Triumphs.’

Why are liberals wrong?

The liberals are claiming that the Government of India has ‘changed’ the National Emblem and made it look angry and furious with visible’ fangs’. They also published photographs of a National Emblem statue that has a ‘calmer’ face and no teeth visible. However, when we see the original Lion Capital from Sarnath that was made over 2,300 years ago, it is notable that the mouths of the lions are open, and the teeth are clearly visible.

So if the real Ashok Stambha or the Lion Capital is very much similar to the cast of the National Emblem unveiled by PM Modi, how are liberals claiming that the National Emblem has ‘calmer-looking’ lions that too with images? The photograph they are sharing is of the National Emblem from the top of the Vidhan Sabha building in Bengaluru, Karnataka.

The National Emblem statue of Vishan Sabha, Bengaluru, is very much different from the Lion Capital that was adapted as National Emblem in 1950. The real National Emblem has lions with open mouths, and teeth are clearly visible, which is not the case with the Bengaluru Vidhan Sabha building’s National Emblem.

Lions are fierce, they have teeth and they roar, whether you or I like it or not

The liberals are complaining that the lions of the National Emblem cast on the new parliament building look fierce. Also, they are “shocked” to see “fangs” visible in the photographs. First of all, the lion is a carnivorous animal. It is fierce and aggressive when it needs to be. You cannot expect it to be ‘calm’ just because you are scared of the majestic roar. Secondly, it is a huge cast. Prime Minister Modi is hardly as tall as the base of the emblem, and the photograph was clicked from a lower angle, making the open mouth and teeth more prominent.

If you stand under a lion with an open mouth and click its photograph, you are going to see the teeth. You cannot expect it not to scare you with its roar or aggressive looks. If you click the same lion from the front when it is looking down, the teeth will not be visible. It is just the perspective of the camera that you were able to see and focus on the teeth.

Lions do need their teeth, they need to hunt. It is the normal, natural state of a lion to possess long sharp teeth and roar. It is absolutely moronic to pretend that lions need to be toothless to appear ‘calm’ because some ‘liberal’ sensibilities get hurt by the sight of a roaring lion.

Liberals and their hate for the Central Vista project

The liberals have spoken against the Central Vista project in length. They have tried to halt the construction, and they tried to do it “legally” using the judiciary, but they failed miserably. The main parliament building will be complete soon. The other buildings that will house the offices of the ministries are also being constructed, which will save hundreds of crores in rent every year. Instead of lauding the idea of saving public money, they are consistently trying to find faults in the project.

Sri Lanka crisis: Liberals scream about ‘majoritarianism’ to avoid talking about dynastic loot, cronyism, rent-seeking

Dear palazzo serfs, is “dynastic dacoity” a banned word in your lexicon?

I know you are unanimous that “majoritarianism” caused the Sri Lanka crisis. Many of us are scratching our heads trying to find out what “majoritarianism” you are talking about.

It is weird that so many of you ‘fearless and independent’ folks that call yourself economists, journalists and academicians are blaming the exact same thing – majoritarianism. As if you were all given a script you were asked to read out from! I know if I use the word toolkit, I will be tarred as Sanghi, WhatsApp graduate etc. Or should I borrow a phrase from your erudite and scholarly friend Tharoor saheb, and ask how come your noses appear to be the same shade of brown?

If that word refers to ethnic majoritarianism, the Lankan Tamil issue, and the ill-treatment of the Tamil minority, that’s not just old news, it cuts across party lines in the Sinhalese South. And goes back to the 1950s if not earlier. Strange that the economy took this long to implode. After all, Lanka’s ethnic problem has been so intractable, that even our born genius Rajiv Gandhi was not able to solve it and ended up…well, you know.

Perhaps you are talking about religious majoritarianism? As far as I know, some, if not all, of the ruling Rajapakse family, headed now by Percy Mahendra Rajapakse, son of Don Alwin Rajapakse, brother of Basil are Christians although they are somewhat ambiguous about their faith and often show up at temples etc. Does that remind you of something or someone in India? In any case, that makes a poor case for religious majoritarianism. Because Christians are a minority too in SL.

If that refers to just the party that the Rajapakse’s represents, I read on TV that the house of PM Ranil Wickramasinghe, who belongs to the opposition, too has been burnt and destroyed. I know some of you wish India suffers Lanka’s fate, but I hope this is not what you have in mind!

As someone quipped, you guys are quite ok with minorityism, especially of the kind that saw UT & his son come to power with the real winners of the election. 

Two plus two is FOUR

I often like to quote Blackadder TV serial because, as I said before, it is an endless reservoir of wit and humour. In one episode, Atkinson is trying to teach his dogsbody (Baldrick) mathematics. You watch this super funny clip here.  

For the impatient, it goes like this (highlights) – 

Blackadder: This is called adding. If I have two beans and then I add two more beans, what do I have

Baldrick:  Some beans

Blackadder: Lets’ do it again..if I have two beans…(repeats)

Baldrick: A very small casserole

Blackadder: Baldrick, the ape creatures of Indus have mastered it! Now try again, One, two, three, FOUR! How many are there?

Baldrick: Three! And ‘that one’!

Blackadder: If I add ‘that one’ to the three, what will I have?

Baldrick: Some beans!

You get the drift? Sorry I was reminded of this when I see your tweets and statements.

You are coming out with all sorts of answer to the Lanka crisis other than the one that stares in your face – dynastic loot, cronyism and rent-seeking. 

Well, there is another, that we all know but that it does not suit the agendas of “amadher Chairman” so his coolies in India that call themselves intellectuals won’t mention it. After all, if they can take the side of their ideological fatherland on matters that directly concern India such as the supply of nukes to Pakistan and the 1962 war, why should they even bother to offend China for something that concerns another country?! 

They too have happily jumped on the ‘majoritarianism’ bandwagon knowing it keeps the GHQ happy and on top of that gets extra licking rights at the palazzo and the perks that go with it.

Did you recall any of our genius economists, promoting dynastic politics and enabling their loot from afar in USA, tell you having four or five members of one family in the cabinet is a disease in of itself? Or are they too busy thinking up what can we say after “she has her grandmothers’ nose”?

Do you recall any leftist intellectual or media elite write articles on how many developing countries have been kept poor by corrupt families that keep their wealth overseas and often openly flaunt it in trips?

Why is that? Why this omerta? Why this tiptoeing around the most significant cause? Is it not even worth a mention? Are you complete idiots like Baldrick?  

I don’t think so, some of you want to become Professors at Harvard. Unless you tell me, Harvard is hiring idiots.

That leaves me with only one answer – you are worried people of this country will come to the same conclusion – that they have been taken for a ride by dynasts. A conclusion you don’t want them to reach. Is it because it has serious implications for your own careers, cushy lives and cash flow?

But I have news for you – Majority of Indians reached that conclusion in 2014 and reaffirmed that in 2019. I hope I live to see it reaffirmed yet again in 2024.