Home Blog Page 6875

After expressing displeasure with toilets and cooking gas, The Wire now trains its gun against Assamese Gamosa

Leftist propaganda website The Wire has problems with lots of things, like toilets, cooking gas etc. The latest to be attacked by the website is the humble gamosa from Assam. The rectangular piece of cloth which is one of the most well-known symbols of Assamese culture is actually a symbol of insecurity, declares The Wire.

The reason? The Wire thinks a lot more people are seen with the gamosa around their neck these days. Hima Das, the sprinting sensation from Assam, had it with her after she won medals at international events. People going to watch a cricket match at the newly built cricket stadium in Guwahati were seen with the gamosa on them. Basically, everyone in Assam carries the gamosa with them, suggest the article. And somehow, in some convoluted, liberal way, that is related to the ongoing process of updating the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in Assam.

Out of nowhere, the article on Gamosa brings the brutal killing of two youths in Karbi Anglong district in Assam by a mob. During that time, the rumour of child kidnappers roaming the streets was going on full fledge and people would suspect any unknown people seen in their area. Local people thought the two Assamese youths were child kidnappers, and brutally killed them, while video recording the event. This was the second event of non-Karbi people killed in the district mostly inhabited by people from Karbi tribe. In 2013, one 21-year-old young man named Jhankar Saikia was beaten to death by auto-rickshaw drivers in Diphu town when he refused to pay ₹10 more.

After both the incidents, ‘Assamese’ youths killed by Karbi people were raised. But the writer mistakenly assumes it to be an effort to impose a notion of Assamese identity on Karbis. Of course, the Karbi people, including all other tribes in Assam are Assamese people. But in Assam, the words ‘Assamese people’ are also used to refer to caste Hindu Assamese people, the non-tribal people in the state who speak the Assamese language as their mother language. It is just a nomenclature of convenience, as unlike the Karbis, the Bodos, the Misings, the Rabhas, the Ahoms, the Tiwas, the Dimasas, the Marans, the Mataks, the Sonowal Kacharis, the Bengalis etc, the non-tribal indigenous Assamese speaking people don’t have a separate community/ethnicity name, and that’s why they are usually referred to Assamese people.

It does not mean that only they are ‘Khati Assamese’ (real Assamese), it is just a shortcut to differentiate them from other tribes and communities in the state. The Wire is completely wrong in this assertion.

Coming back to Gamosa (not Gamusa, the mo in Gamosa to be pronounced as the mo in mole), The Wire in the second paragraph correctly says that it is used by all irrespective of ethnic background. But just a few paragraphs below, it makes a 180° turn asserts that Gamosa is not a cultural symbol for all and asks why the other versions of the gamosa of different tribes are not seen in public. Well, that is a weird question, if the gamosa belongs to all communities and not just Caste Hindu Assamese, what is the problem if everyone carries it?

Prince William and Kate Middleton with a handloom weaver in Assam

The gamosa is a rectangular piece of cloth woven on a handloom. The most familiar form is white with red borders. The borders on the long side are stripes, while the borders on the short sides are intricate designs woven into the cloth, never embroidered. This is the gamosa that is used to facilitate dignitaries at public events. Gamosa is also an integral part of the Bihu festival. It is wrapped over the Bihu Dhol, the men use it as headscarf during Bihu dance. During Bohag Bihu, newly woven gamosa is gifted to family members and relatives.

Gamosa is also an integral part of religious rites in Assam. A gamosa around the neck is a must while offering prayer at a Namghar, the Vaishnav shrine. The Sanctum Santorum of the Namghar also must have the gamosa, where it is laid on the Guru Aaxon. Often such gamosas are woven with religious motifs.

Sanctum Santorum of Dhekiakhowa Namghar in Assam
Sanctum Santorum of Dhekiakhowa Namghar in Assam

Yes, gamosa is an integral, inseparable part of Assamese identity. But no, keeping it on you all the time will not ensure inclusion of your name in NRC, that is one of the dozens of misconceptions about the NRC process. Only some political parties and left-wing media outside Assam are worried about NRC, the people in Assam are generally cool about it. In fact, there is no protest in the state despite such a large number of people being left out of the final draft of NRC. The state is seeing massive protests over the proposed citizenship amendment bill, none on NRC. So, the assumption that more people are carrying the gamosa for the NRC is baseless and wrong.

But do we see more people with gamosa these days? Perhaps yes. Prime Minister Narendra Modi is seen with regularly, not just when he is in Assam. Even leftist activist Yogendra Yadav is always seen with a gamosa around his neck. Like Hima Das, more and more people from Assam have received national and international fame. More people from the state are seen on national television these days, and often such people carry the gamosa with them. It is just a matter of a particular item becoming popular, like a food item or a music form.

Gamosa is integral part of Bihu in Assam
Gamosa is an integral part of Bihu in Assam

Moreover, like Modi jacket, the gamosa has also become a fashion statement due to its increased visibility. It does not have anything to with proving one’s identity. And people love it when their cultural symbol is seen carried by an international leader, an international champion, or a Kaun Banega Crorepati winner, only a few leftists may cringe at that. Rest assured, it is not a matter of concern at all.

Nobody is being forced to carry the gamosa, not even indirectly. People are doing it on their own. It does and cannot suppress the identity of other tribes in the state. The Wire should stop worrying about such non-issues, and stop attempting to create animosity in the minds of tribes in Assam against other communities in the state.

Don’t attribute motive to us: Delhi HC in Gurumurthy contempt case

A Division Bench of the Delhi High Court comprising of Justice Siddharth Mridul and Justice I S Mehta, today while hearing a contempt petition against journalist and Economic Analyst S Gurumurthy stated that social media cannot be used to scandalize the judiciary.

As per reports, the contempt petition was filed by the Delhi High Court Bar Association (DHCBA) against S Gurumurthy for posting the tweets asking if Muralidhar J, who had granted bail to Karti Chidambaram in the INX Media bribery case, had been a junior to Karti Chidambaram’s father and Senior Advocate P Chidambaram.

Another Bench of the Delhi High Court had earlier issued a suo motu contempt notice against Gurumurthy last month after he had shared a tweet hinting to bias on the part of Justice Muralidhar after he had passed an order setting aside the transit remand order against alleged Urban Maoist Gautam Navlakha earlier this month.

Gurumurthy’s advocate had said that he was an eminent journalist and the tweet was merely a question and claimed that the petition filed by DHCBA was not maintainable. Justice Mridul observed that the present case does not concern a specific judge but the judicial system. He said, “We are not supposed to defend ourselves on social media. Judges don’t defend themselves. Is this fair comment that you attribute motive to the judiciary? We are dismayed.”

The court also reportedly turned down Gurumurthy’s counsel’s request seeking time to file a reply to the rejoinder filed by the DHCBA saying that there can be no reply to a rejoinder and asked the lawyer to proceed with his defense.

Justice Mridul also expressed his displeasure commenting, “Journalistic license does not give you the right to make unsavoury allegations. We are all in for free press but don’t attribute motive to us”.

The court had directed two social media platforms to block the web links of the offending article leveling ‘scandalous’ allegations against the judge. The matter will be next heard on December 4.

Rahul Gandhi needs to personally apologize to PM Narendra Modi and Uma Bharti

No expressions of regret, no half measures can make up for the kind of casteist language that Senior Congress leader C P Joshi has used yesterday.

Untitled.png

Absolutely unpardonable. This is outright casteist name-calling directed at the PM and a Cabinet Minister. And don’t miss the reference to “pandits” … remember that Jawaharlal Nehru is often referred to as Pandit Nehru.

The only way Congress can possibly atone for this is for Rahul Gandhi to personally apologize to PM Modi and to Uma Bharti.

Instead, Rahul Gandhi came up with a response that didn’t so much as condemn C P Joshi’s remark explicitly.

Untitled.png

Wow! Merely expressing confidence that C P Joshi will eventually realize that he has done wrong and suggesting that C P Joshi should express regret.

No condemnation. No apology from Rahul Gandhi. Not even regret from Rahul Gandhi. No expulsion of C P Joshi. Didn’t even ask C P Joshi to apologize, merely suggested that he should express regret.

To a casteist element like C P Joshi, this would feel more like a pat on the back.

The toxic, casteist messaging has been coming from the topmost levels of the Congress Party for a while now.

The remarks of C P Joshi can only be seen as an addendum to those of Congress’ official spokesperson Randeep Surjewala when he explained that Rahul Gandhi is “not only a Hindu but a Janeudhari Hindu“.

Untitled.png

The meaning was already crystal clear when the Congress said it at the time. That among the Hindus, the Congress believe there is something very special about being a “janeudhari”. What is special Rahul Gandhiji? Tell us, please.

Around the same time, Mani Shankar Aiyar referred to PM Modi as “neech”. At the time, the media made it appear as if Aiyar had thought of using that expression all by himself. But before this Priyanka Gandhi had herself used the word “neech” for Modi.

Today C P Joshi’s remarks merely provide a confirmation of the thinking within the Congress party.

So it is not like C P Joshi’s words should surprise anyone. Earlier Ghulam Nabi Azad himself had described Modi as a”Gangu Teli”, another direct reference to Modi being born in the Teli caste. We have seen Congress cadre using posters such as this that leave nothing to the imagination.

Untitled.png

And yet Rahul Gandhi doesn’t apologize. Doesn’t expel C P Joshi. Doesn’t even condemn.

And neither will anyone from India’s liberal intelligentsia, media or academia condemn C P Joshi. We have had a few stray reactions from them in which they have only expressed irritation at C P Joshi possibly jeopardizing Congress prospects in the Assembly Elections happening less than a week from now. Not one condemnation. Not one call that Rahul Gandhi should apologize.

Where is the entire caravan of Indian liberal revolutionaries who spend their lives delivering heady speeches against caste repression?

I remember one JNU professor who said that Hindu society is the “most violent in the world” because of its repressive caste hierarchy. I would like to know what she has to say about these remarks from Rahul Gandhi’s man.

They get triggered by everything: by the lighting of “Hindu looking” ceremonial lamps, by women wearing sarees, by rasam, by bhajan sandhyas, by Hanuman posters, everything.

Everything they see makes them want to get up and “Smash Brahmanical Patriarchy” and burn Manusmriti. But the one time they hold their peace is when a Congress leader throws casteist slurs at Narendra Modi.

They are still mad at Manu for what he said 2000 years ago. But they have already forgiven C P Joshi.

There is a lesson here for all of Hindu society to remember. Just in case you haven’t figured out the reality of these “activists”, it could not be more clear today. They don’t care even a tiny bit about justice. Their only aim is to divide and defame Hindus, to put them on a defensive, so that they the liberal elite may rule over them.

That is why their idea of smashing “Brahmanical Patriarchy” is to get the OBC Prime Minister voted out of office, to be replaced by a fifth generation ‘janeudhari’ dynast.

Smash hypocrisy.

Attack on Chinese consulate in Pakistan, two policemen killed

0

The Chinese consulate in Pakitan’s Karachi was attacked today by three (some reports say four) gunmen who opened fire on the consulate in order to get inside.


“There were three attackers and all three have been killed … They could not even get in the compound. They tried to get into the visa section,” the police chief, Amir Shaikh, told reporters. “They tried to get inside but the Rangers and police killed one of the terrorists,” Shaikh said.

Two policemen have reportedly been killed in the attack as the gunmen stormed the Chinese consulate. No Chinese citizens or Pakistani civilians were killed.

Pakistani Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi while addressing a press conference, confirmed, “All of our Chinese friends and officials who work at the consulate, 21 in total, all of them are safe and they have been shifted to a secure location.”

India has condemned the attack on the Chinese consulate.


Jiand Baloch of the Balochistan Liberation Army, taking responsibility of the attack, confirmed that there were three suicide attackers .“They stormed the Chinese embassy in Karachi. China is exploiting our resources,” spokesman Jiand Baloch told over the telephone.

Balochistan, despite its rich mineral and natural gas reserves, remains the poorest province of Pakistan. China, one of Pakistan’s closest allies, has invested billions into the country in recent years as part of a massive infrastructure project that seeks to connect its western province Xinjiang with the Arabian Sea.

No leaves for JNU Teachers if they do not mark their attendance or submit attendance records: JNU administration

0

In a novel step to curb absenteeism in the Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), the administration is planning to deny leave to those teachers who are either not marking their own attendance or failing to submit attendance records of their students, reported Indian Express.

The JNU administration despite facing severe backlash is planning to bring in new changes to make marking attendance compulsory for the teachers. JNU registrar Pramod Kumar, on 13 November, has issued a circular to make the new notification official.

The new circular states that leave requests of faculty members should be forwarded by Deans and Chairpersons of the department only after confirming that the concerned faculty member has “adhered to the attendance rules of the university and has been marking his/her attendance.”

“While forwarding request/ paper/proposal of faculties, it has to be ensured by the Deans of Schools/ Chairperson of Centres/Special Centres that the faculty concerned has been taking attendance of students as well. As desired by the competent authority, no request/paper/proposal of faculty will be entertained/considered if he/she has not adhered to the above decisions of statutory bodies,” it said.

However, the JNU Teachers’ Association (JNUTA) has called it an “arbitrary decision” and said the circular was not drawn from any provision of the JNU Act, statutes and ordinances and was “without any lawful substance”. Registrar Kumar has reiterated his circular and said, “The Executive Council has adopted mandatory attendance; teachers not marking attendance are being denied leaves.”

The JNU administration. earlier, had also planned to bring JNU administration, teachers of the university under the Conduct of Central Services Rules, to restrict them for making irresponsible public statements against the university administration.

The JNU administration had also made 75 per cent attendance compulsory for its students and had to face a backlash from students and teachers of the university. JNU students have filed a petition in the Delhi High Court against the imposition of mandatory attendance and the matter is currently sub-judice.

Journalist Shujaat Bukhari’s killer among 6 terrorists shot dead by security forces in Anantnag encounter

0

Top Lashkar-e-Taiba commander Azad Ahmad Malik along with other five Islamist terrorists have been killed in an encounter by the security forces in Shalgund village of Dashnipora in Bijbehara area of south Kashmir’s Anantnag district on Friday.

The LeT commander Azad Ahmad Malik who has been shot down during the operation was reportedly involved in the assassination of Kashmiri Journalist Syed Shujaat Bukhari in Srinagar. Bukhari and his two guards were killed by these LeT terrorists outside Rising Kashmir office in Srinagar on June 14.

Army spokesperson Rajesh Kalia speaking to the media said that six terrorists have been killed in the gunfight. He said that they have recovered arms and ammunition from the encounter site.

The slain terrorists have been identified as Azad Ahmad Malik alias Dada of Arwani, Basit Mir of Khanabal, Unais or Anees of Bijbehara, Aqib of Waghama Bijbehara, Shahid from Awantipora and Firdaus Ahmad of Machpona Pulwama.

Reportedly, a joint team of army’s 3RR and SOG Anantnag launched a cordon and search operation early morning in Shalgund-Satkipora in Dachnipora area of Bijbehara following inputs about the presence of terrorists. As soon as the forces approached the suspected spot, the hiding terrorists opened fire leading to a gunfight.

The Jammu and Kashmir Police has registered a case and initiated the investigation in the matter. According to the official sources, no collateral damage has taken place on the Army side during this incident.

Meanwhile, the security officials have requested citizens not to enter the encounter zone since such an area can prove dangerous due to stray explosive materials.

The killing of Journalist Shujaat Bukhari had led to severe propaganda in the media, as the left-leaning media could not accept the fact that terrorists backed by the separatists had killed one of their own. Instead, they resorted to politics to blame his vocal critic scientist Prof. Anand Ranganathan who found Bukhari was not a ‘moderate’.

The Left-liberal cabal had deliberately chosen to ignore the fact that the Islamic terrorists backed by the terrorist state Pakistan was behind the killing of controversial journalist Shujaat Bukhari. Instead, they felt ‘such killings’ are usually preceded by hate messages and malicious campaigns on social media and trained guns on people who had criticised Bukhari for his views.

Zealot Christians dub missionary who risked the existence of the entire Sentinelese tribe a ‘martyr’

The death of the Christian Missionary, John Allen Chau, at the hands of the aboriginal Sentinelese tribe has sparked a whole host of reactions across the world. While most say that Chau was horribly misguided to even attempt to convert the tribe in the first place, some are calling him a ‘martyr’ for the Christian faith.


Apart from friends and family, fellow Christians are dubbing Chau a ‘martyr’ as well who risked ‘everything to share the good news with a tribe who has no known contact with the outside world’.


Devout Christians are also calling Chau a ‘wonderful martyr’ and claim that he will go ‘straight to heaven’.


It appears that the Sentinelese have been on the radar of Christian Missionaries for a while now. Joshua Project, a non-profit, that documents every ethnic group under the Sun and the prevalence of Christianity among them, lists the Sentinelese in their database as well. The page dedicated to the Sentinelese states, “Sentinelese people need to know that Creator God exists and that He loves them and paid the price for their sins.”

The page also states, “Pray that the Indian Government will allow Christians to earn the trust of the Sentinelese people and that they will be permitted to live among them.” It adds, “Pray that God will open doors to Sentinelese people to receive the gospel message.” Under such circumstance, it is no surprise that even a zealot like Chau is being dubbed a ‘martyr’.

As we have reported earlier, Chau had risked the existence of the entire tribe by coming in contact with them as he could have transmitted pathogens the Sentinelese had no immunity to. He risked it to ‘establish the kingdom of Jesus on the island’.

Congress leader Raj Babbar mocks PM Modi’s 97-year-old mother, claiming Rupee inching towards her age

After senior Congress leader CP Joshi’s cheap casteist slur against Prime Minister Narendra Modi and other leaders of the BJP, it is now Uttar Pradesh Congress Chief Raj Babbar’s turn to stoop into yet another low in politics.  Yesterday he compared the devaluing rate of the Indian rupee to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s aged mother.

Senior Congress leader Raj Babbar speaking at a rally in Madhya Pradesh referred to PM Modi’s 97-year old mother Heeraben Modi and said, “He (Modi) used to say that the Indian rupee has fallen so much against the Dollar that it was nearing the age of the then prime minister (Manmohan Singh). Today, the rupee’s valuation has dropped so low, that it is inching closer to your beloved mother’s age”.

The Congress leader Babbar while campaigning in the Madhya Pradesh ahead of the state elections also referred Prime Minister Modi as manhoos (ominous) over the rising fuel prices.

Raj Babbar went on to claim that Congress party has never opposed to the construction of the Ram temple in Ayodhya and further added that he has now felt that even the Muslim community want to build a temple at Ayodhya. He said the BJP rakes up the temple issue during every election but never had any great passion for Lord Ram. He said whenever there is an election, the BJP starts seeking votes in Ram’s name.

Earlier, Congress leader CP Joshi had targetted the caste and humble background of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. In a video which has gone viral now, former minister CP Joshi is seen claiming people belonging to the lower castes, including Narendra Modi, who is from other ‘dharam‘ (meaning lower caste in this context) should not talk about Hindu religion.

Raj Babbar had caused a severe controversy recently, after the actor-turned-politician during a poll campaign in Chattisgarh had compared Naxals to revolutionaries saying that “revolution” undertaken by them should be resolved through talks.

Congress leaders have often targetted the humble origins of the Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Senior Congress leader Mani Shankar Aiyar has time and again refers PM Modi as a ‘Chaiwala’ and had once called him as  ‘neech insaan’. Shashi Tharoor had recently called him a ‘Scorpion sitting on a Shivling’ and that’s why they cannot hit him with a ‘Chappal’.

Another Senior Congress leader from Karnataka, TB Jayachandra had also made derogatory statements against the Prime Minister saying that time has come to burn down PM Modi.

More loyal than the King’s courtier: Pallavi Ghosh acts as Rahul Gandhi’s faithful emissary

Congress friendly media is cute. In what appears to be the ‘fax’ moment for Congress leaders and Congress-friendly media, journalist Pallavi Ghosh took it upon herself to convey it to Congress candidate from Nathdwara, Rajasthan, CP Joshi that Congress President Rahul Gandhi is upset with his comments and wants him to “express regret”.


CP Joshi, while addressing an election rally in Nathdwara had made a casteist comment on PM Modi suggesting that only people belonging to the Brahmin caste have the rights and knowledge to talk about Hinduism.

After much outrage on social media, Congress President Rahul Gandhi took to Twitter to condemn Joshi’s statement. At 10:39 am, Rahul Gandhi tweeted that Party leaders should refrain from making comments which could hurt any community in the society.


Three minutes later, Pallavi Ghosh announced that Rahul Gandhi has stepped in to condemn CP Joshi.


She even went on to cite sources who said that senior Congress leaders had conveyed it to Rahul Gandhi that Joshi’s statements may damage the party headed by a Janeu-dhaari Brahmin. She even complimented Rahul Gandhi of showing courage to pull up their erring colleague in public.


After all, any such statements could damage to the dynasty, and in turn the party. Notice how Ghosh feels that such remarks ‘damage the party’ and not the society at large?

Then, as if on cue, at 11:01, 20 minutes after party chief had ‘pulled up erring colleague in public’, Ghosh, too pulled up Joshi in public. She conveyed it to CP Joshi that Congress chief Rahul Gandhi has asked him to express regret.


Joshi, too, following instructions immediately, within 8 minutes of Ghosh’s tweet, expressed regret.


Pallavi Ghosh has earlier quite a few times answered curious questions on behalf of Rahul Gandhi and Congress. Like, she knew the criteria for inviting the ‘women journalists’ for a closed-door, off the record interaction with Rahul Gandhi in July this year. Amidst all the fawning over Rahul Gandhi, she often cites ‘sources’ for the things which Rahul Gandhi has planned to do, like more hugs.

Pallavi Ghosh had also come to Congress IT cell head Divya Spandana’s rescue when the latter had a Twitter meltdown recently over an image of PM Modi she tweeted. In the tweet, Divya had compared PM Modi with a bird dropping, but Ghosh’s source (it is always a source, hmm) had clarified that Divya didn’t mean the PM. And when she could not fawn any more over Rahul, she showers her praises for Priyanka Vadra, his sister, crediting Priyanka for his ‘rare form’.

‘Liberals’ love to cajole the knife wielding thief, while mocking the ones who save their sorry tuchus

“I wonder whether those of our political masters who have been put in charge of the defence of the country can distinguish a mortar from a motor; a gun from a howitzer; a guerrilla from a gorilla, although a great many resemble the latter”

These glorious words were spoken by Field Marshal Sam Manekshaw. A man of vision. But perhaps, limited vision because he failed to foresee that the gorilla-esque fools wouldn’t be limited to just politicians.

There is a strange sort of obsession among the self-proclaimed left-liberals with cutting off their nose to spite their face. This asinine obsession transcends all bounds of reason, sanity and decency. They doggedly pursue some misplaced ideal, less out of love for those ideals and more, out of their unbridled desperation to be accepted into an incestuous cabal that undermines every value that this great land stands for.

Today, Economic Times published an editorial cartoon strip by R Prasad that did just that. Defy decency and reason to pander to this well-entrenched cabal.

Judging strictly on logic, this illustration was downright asinine which drew ridiculous conclusions. Firstly, illegal immigrants are not residents. They are trespassers. They are elements who had jumped over the guarded gates of the residential society and expect the residents to open up their homes to them, to let them feed off the already paltry resources and consider them a part of the family.

In fact, some of these trespassers even have knives and guns that would probably be used to shoot the very people who are forced to open up their homes to them. They have been declared a security threat.

In such a scenario, it’s the chowkidar’s job to haul those trespassers with the edge of pants and physically toss them out of the residential society.

The liberals are, however, known to be logically impaired. So the fallacy of the argument itself doesn’t bother me as much. The elephantine moronery is rather expected. It is the ethical deprivation that bothers me on a much deeper level.

The vilification of the Armed Forces has been a constant in the liberal cabal. They protect the ones who scream “tum kitne Burhan maroge har ghar se Burhan niklega”, they question the Army for dealing with Kalashnikov wielding terrorists in the only language they understand – the language of the bullet and generally mock the Army with the “they are paid to do their job” rhetoric.

The innate lack of respect for the ultimate sacrifice or even the willingness to make the ultimate sacrifice so these very “liberals” can sleep peacefully at night without gun toting trespassers threatening their pristine little wine-sipping existence is rather staggering.

Over their cut-glass crystal cutlery when they talk about Pakistan and the mushaira’s they so miss, they rue the ‘barbaric’ Indian Army and how war is never the answer. The hope that the two countries would just talk. Only if those ‘damn trigger-happy soldiers’ could stop shooting at the less privileged terrorists who picked up the AK47 because of poverty or this, that and the other. The barrel of the gun simply being a euphemism for the elite. A euphemism for their misplaced sympathy that washes away their own inadequacies. After all, while leading a pointless life of page-3 parties, ‘peace’ is a lofty cause to gulp down with that glass of wine in the evening.

But everything has an opportunity cost. The opportunity cost of our tolerance towards the ‘liberals’ is foregoing the luxury of living in a society whose collective IQ doesn’t drop every time the ‘liberal’ opens their mouth to speak. The opportunity cost of peace, however, is the blood of the ‘damn trigger-happy soldier’ who stands a post and lets the ‘liberal’ sip their wine in peace without their palace being torn to rubble by some terrorist.

Every bullet that pierces through the armour of an Indian soldier is the cost that is paid for every breath a citizen takes.

On a more earthier level, I believe most citizens are patriotic. Most citizens respect the Armed Forces and the immense, unimaginable sacrifices they make. Every citizen realises that for them, freedom is free because the soldier has already paid the cost for it.

But for the ‘liberal’ sitting in his intellectual castle in the air, who would never get his hands or op-eds dirty by talking about real issues, the Army is a tool, the vilification of which, gives his sorry life a loftier purpose. That of peace without the ones who protect the very peace he preaches off.

Capt Manoj Kumar Pandey said, “Some goals are so worthy, it’s glorious even to fail”. Knocking sense into these self-proclaimed conscience keepers is an exercise in futility, but try we must.

While the ‘liberal’ cajoles the knife-wielding thief because they believe humanity is offering the other cheek and mock the very soldier who lays his life down to save their sorry tuchus from being blown to smithereens by terrorists, the Nation, by and large, appreciates the sacrifices made by these men.