Saturday, May 30, 2020
Home Opinions State vs Hindus – how Indian politics has destroyed the notion of 'secularism'

State vs Hindus – how Indian politics has destroyed the notion of ‘secularism’

Also Read

Divya
I'm Not Arguing. I'm Simply Explaining Why I'm Right.

A wise man once said “When you are used to privilege, equality seems like oppression.”

Was reminded of this brilliant quote yesterday when a speech by Prime Minister Narendra Modi evoked hysterical outrage by the so-called left-liberals. The outrage was caused by a statement where he demanded equitable rights for Hindus and Muslims: 1) for electricity during Ramzan and Diwali, and 2) Fair distribution of land for cremation and burial grounds.

This comes on the backdrop of blatant appeasements schemes that have been directed at the minority community by Samajwadi Party, including of electricity distribution (read this report). To any sane mind, what could possibly be objectionable about demanding equal rights?

- article continues after ad - - article resumes -

However, sanity and logic has been the first casualty of new age Indian politics, especially in the post-Modi era. The speech resulted in him being portrayed as communal and divisive and he was accused of stoking religious fires. Many ironically went on to imply that this demand was at loggerheads with Sabka Saath Sabka Vikas, while it was not, as is evident from this report. The irony would be comical if the implications had not been so tragic.

This brings us to the question of how did we get to a situation where asking for equal rights for Hindus leads to a person being branded communal? More frighteningly, HOW did we get to a situation where we even NEED to ask for equal rights? Wasn’t that a guarantee when the word SECULAR was added to the constitution? How did it come to pass that minority pandering is blatantly encouraged while liberals scream bloody murder when equal rights are demanded by Hindus?

Have we been ignoring small, innocuous sounding appeasement signals for far too long? Or is it because our left-leaning media has been economical with portraying the truth all this while? Or is it because of political correctness of a large Hindu population?

There have been innumerable instances in the past when desperate minority appeasing statements have been made by the politicians and our secular-liberals have turned a blind eye. UP election reminds one of Mulayam Singh Yadav who was the Chief Minister in 1990, during the Ram Janmbhoomi movement.

- article continues after ad - - article resumes -

Very recently, in the run up to the elections, Mulayam admitted that ordering the firing which killed 16 Karsevaks was very painful for him but it was necessary to “maintain the faith of Muslims”. He went on to state that he would have ordered the killing of even a larger number of Karsevaks to allay the fears of Muslims at that point of time.

Let it sink in that a former Chief Minister, who is currently in active politics, could get away unquestioned by admitting that he ordered the killings of Hindus solely for the purpose of allaying the fears of Muslims. Contrast this with the outrage created when Narendra Modi spoke about a hypothetical puppy coming under a car wheels. That the “Idea of India” gives precedence to an imaginary puppy over actual flesh and blood Hindus killed in firing by the State is a sign of the times we live in.

Who can forget Manmohan Singh’s statement from the ramparts of the Red Fort about minorities, especially Muslims, having the first rights on the India’s resources? Was he termed communal and divisive for that hugely provocative, not to mention unconstitutional, statement?

Innumerable other policies like RTE (which allows the freedom to ‘minority run schools’ not to admit poor students, who would often be underprivileged Hindus) and control of temple administrations have a patently anti-Hindu agenda, which the allegedly Hindu government at the Centre has been unable to touch. And add to that recent announcements like that of Telangana government to provide financial assistance only to drivers belonging to the minority communities, as if Hindu cab drivers are all affluent.

- article continues after ad - - article resumes -

Politicians across the spectrum, including Mamata Banerjee and Arvind Kejriwal have also often made openly minority appeasing statements. One could afford to ignore these statements as vote gathering tactics, had these statements been restricted to politicians. Situation is worse.

It is unfortunate and dangerous that even our judicial and law enforcement systems have been bitten by the appeasement bug. Or even more frightening is the scenario that these politicians have managed to create a situation where these agencies, which are supposed to be the backbone of a just and harmonious society, have been emasculated to this extent.

Recently an RTI application was made to find out what action had been taken on the court order regarding the use of loudspeakers in places of worship. The RTI revealed that Mumbai Police is avoiding taking action against mosques as they fear a “potential law and order situation”. Again, one sees no hue and cry that our law enforcement agencies have been rendered impotent by fear of a particular religious group.

Similarly, in a recent ruling, Mumbai High Court passed an order allowing the slaughter of goats in housing societies. So if you are a Hindu or for that matter anyone who is put off by the spectacle of an animal being dismembered in your building premises, there is precious little you can do about it.

By far special government schemes offered by the State to minorities were accepted by most Hindus all along, our “Secular” State notwithstanding. There have been mild questioning voices every now and then but by and large the Hindu community has been in consonance.

This longstanding equanimity has however led to a situation where a large chunk of Hindus find themselves pushed against a wall. The impact of appeasement has now begun to hit closer home and the threat has become more existential as vote bank political pitches reach higher crescendos.

When demanding equality in a “secular” country has begun to be deemed as “communal”, what hope does this largely peaceful community have, in the face of blatant appeasement driven politics? Is this going to prove to be the point of inflection for Hindus at large? Or will we continue to bear the cross of “secularism” at our own cost?

  Support Us  

Whether NDTV or 'The Wire', they never have to worry about funds. In name of saving democracy, they get money from various sources. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

Trending now

Divya
I'm Not Arguing. I'm Simply Explaining Why I'm Right.

DD News temporarily shifts operations from Mandi House to Khelgaon after an employee tested positive for Coronavirus after death

News operations of DD News shifted to Khelgaon studio from the night of May 28 while Mandi house studios are sanitised

Mamata Banerjee opens up places of worship from June 1 in West Bengal, refuses to take migrants back saying Shramik Express trains are Corona...

Mamata Banerjee alleged that large numbers of workers returning is the reason behind spike in coronavirus cases in West Bengal

D10: Britain proposes new alliance of 10 democracies including India, South Korea, Australia and G7 nations to break China’s monopoly on 5G technology

The United Kingdom aims to create an alternative suppliers of 5G technology and other technologies to by forming the D10 group

IAF makes heavy-lift CH-47 Chinook helicopters operational in the Eastern air command near Indo-China border

CH-47 Chinook advanced multi-mission helicopters will be based at Air Force Station in Mohanbari in Dibrugarh of Assam near China border

White House slams Twitter for censoring US President Donald Trump but refusing to take action against glorification of Jihad

Donald Trump has been involved in a raging battle against social media giant Twitter after the latter included a 'fact-check' on his tweet.

Twitter restores ISKCON spokesperson’s account after briefly locking it, removes proof of insult of Hindus in Shemaroo video citing copyright violation

ISKCON spokesperson Radharamn Das had posted the vile video on Twitter as a proof of crime against the ISKCON and Hindus

Recently Popular

ISKCON files complaint against comedian Surleen Kaur and Shemaroo Entertainment Ltd for a video where ISKCON devotees were called ‘harami porn-waley’

Surleen Kaur had said in the video published by Shemaroo ‘no doubt we are from ISKCON, but from inside we are all harami porn lovers’.

ISKCON rejects Shemaroo Entertainment’s ‘apology’, to proceed with legal action against comedian Surleen Kaur for abusive, derogatory statements

A complaint had been filed by ISKCON organisation against comedian Ms Surleen Kaur and Shemaroo Entertainment Ltd for her abusive, derogatory remarks against the organisations, saints and Hindus.

Zaira Wasim, who had left acting for Islam, now quotes the Quran to insinuate that locust infestation in Rajasthan is ‘Allah’s wrath’

Several areas in Eastern Africa, Pakistan, and India have seen attacks by massive swarms of locusts recently. However, it is not understood why the former actress is insinuating these locust attacks as some sort of Islamic curse upon a specific group of people whom she refers to as 'arrogant'.

Woman raped by Moulvi Aslam, media gives it a ‘Hindu spin’ by using image of a saffron-clad Hindu priest and describing the perpetrator as...

A Muslim sorcerer claiming to relieve people of their miseries through his wizardry was depicted as a Hindu priest by media organisations

Twist in the tale: ISKCON accepts apology of Shemaroo, says won’t pursue its case against the company for Surleen Kaur video that insulted ISKCON...

ISKCON further stated that it does not believe in vengeance and instead acts in accordance to moral, ethical and legal values.

Connect with us

228,683FansLike
355,089FollowersFollow
243,000SubscribersSubscribe
Advertisements