Home News Reports All you need to know about 'The Fugitive Economic Offenders Ordinance'

All you need to know about ‘The Fugitive Economic Offenders Ordinance’

White collar crimes are not new in India, they continue to occur from time to time reminding us that there are loopholes in our justice system that can be exploited and sometimes, people can get away with just about anything. With the liberalization of the economy in 1991, India faced more and more economic offences as the influx of money into the country increased, to tackle this growing problem an act was introduced by the then incumbent government known as  – The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA). This gave the government the authority to seize and confiscate properties obtained by laundered money but that was all subject to the process of criminal prosecution. In simpler terms, the offender is able to flee from the jurisdiction of the Indian courts then his or her properties cannot be seized and persecuted. It became a farcical legislative remedy to the growing ailment of economic offences.

Thus, when the recent scams involving Nirav Modi and Mallya came into light, people were outraged by the fact that government is unable to bring the perpetrators to justice or even confiscate their properties acquired by dubious means to recover some of the money. The onus was on the incumbent government to bring about a legislative approach that tackles this problem comprehensively and without any concessions. The incumbent government introduced an ordinance – “The Fugitive Economic Offenders Ordinance, 2018”.  This ordinance was approved by the union cabinet and then promulgated by the President on April 21st, 2018. It is important to keep in mind that the Bill was introduced in Lok Sabha on March 12, 2018, and is currently pending.

This ordinance is brought with a clearly defined approach in mind that is to make sure that no economic offender can leave the country and even if they leave their assets can be seized and confiscated by the government without any hiccups, for this reason, the ordinance vests many special powers to the courts and the directors. The highlights of the ordinance are described below –

- Advertisement - - article resumes -

Who is a Fugitive economic offender?

The ordinance defines a fugitive economic offender as an offender whose offence is worth more than 100 crores and an arrest warrant has been issued on his or her name. The ordinance also goes on to add specific details about what constitutes a fugitive economic offender under this ordinance –

  1. A person who has left the country to avoid prosecution.
  2. Refuses to return to the country to face the prosecution.

The offences as stated in the schedule include –

  • Cheque Dishonour.
  • Transactions defrauding creditors.
  • Money laundering.
  • Counterfeiting government stamps or currency.

Modus Operandi  

Any Director or Deputy Director appointed under the PMLA, 2002 has been empowered to file an application before a special court to declare a person as a fugitive economic offender. The application can be made on various grounds stated in the ordinance such as reasons to believe that an individual is a fugitive economic offender or any information about the person’s whereabouts, the authorized person suspects that a number of properties are acquired by means which constitutes criminal offence and hence confiscation of them are sought and so on.

After receiving this application the Special Court (ACT, 2002) is to release a notice to the individual to appear in a specific place on a date which is not less than six weeks from the issuance of the notice. The notice will also state that failure to adhere to the directives of the notice the accused will be declared as a fugitive economic offender.

The powers of the Director

The director or the authorised officer is vested with the power of a Civil Court. He or She can attach any property to the list without the prior permission of The Special Court, provided they file the attachment before the court within 30 days. The officer is also empowered to search and detain any person the officer has reasons to believe to be involved in crimes mentioned in the schedule, provided that the detained person be produced before a Magistrate Court or to a higher ranking official than the detaining officer within the next 24 hours. The officer can also direct to search a place or seize documents.

The punishment  

Failing to adhere to the notice issued by the Special court will lead to confiscation of –

  1. Anything which deems as proceeds of the crime.
  2. Benami properties in India and abroad.
  3. Other properties in India and aboard.

After, the confiscation all rights and titles will rest with the Central Government and free from any claims made by other parties on that property. An administrator is to be appointed by the Central government for the purpose of managing and disposal of these assets.

Drawbacks

This is indeed a commendable legislative action taken by the Modi government to curb economic offences but how successful this approach will remain a question as confiscation of foreign properties are outside the jurisdiction of the Indian courts who will be issuing such directives. Although the ordinance empowers Indian courts to issue applications to the concerned authorities in the foreign countries, the feasibility of such an approach becoming effective is close to none. Also, the 100 crore slab is a bit arbitrary in nature as the issue of proportionate justice gets somewhat blurred here, by introducing this slab the government may give off a wrong impression that it is somewhat fine to commit fraud as long as it is under 100 crore INR.

While every step taken in this direction is bound to have certain limitations, the Government has taken strides in bringing the perpetrators to justice. The Fugitive Economics Ordinance is certainly a step towards that direction. Even earlier, the Benami Property Act, for example, was never notified by the Congress government and hence couldn’t be implemented. With such laws now being passed, notified and implemented, one can hope for a positive change.

Help Us Reach Every Indian, Please Share This Post
We need your support to survive in the media industry. Please consider paying us for the content we produce:

To know more about these payments, please click here.


Advertisement

Big Story

The Kolkata police finally swung into action and arrested seven men: Sheik Rahit, Fardin Khan, Sk. Sabir Ali, Sk. Gani, Sk. Imran Ali, Sk. Wasim and Atif Khan, for allegedly harassing the complainant.

2019 World Cup Is Here!

Catch the latest on Cricket World Cup as it unfolds, special coverage by Opindia

Anjana Om Kashyap heckles doctors and nurses in Bihar hospital

What you did in that ICU is not journalism, Anjana Om Kashyap, it is insensitive, creating a nuisance and endangering lives

A video came to light earlier where Anjana Om Kashyap, a senior journalist from the India Today group was seen heckling and questioning a doctor inside the ICU over the outbreak of Encephalitis in Bihar

After threatening Jesus to choose between her and Rakhi Sawant, Tanushree Dutta questions Modi’s ‘Ram Rajya’

The Mumbai police have recently filed a B Summary report, giving a clean chit to Bollywood actor Nana Patekar, in connection with actor Tanushree Dutta sexual harassment case

Rapper Hard Kaur goes mental on social media: Blames RSS Chief for terror attacks, calls Yogi ‘OrangeRapeMan’

Taran Kaur Dhillon, more popularly known by her stage name Hard Kaur, appears to have fallen over the edge.
Gujarat: Past karma will haunt Congress in fascinating Rajya Sabha bypoll irony

Gujarat: Past karma will haunt Congress in fascinating Rajya Sabha bypoll irony

The bypolls for the 2 vacant Rajya Sabha seats from Gujarat are going to be held shortly. The Congress has moved the SC, but given the clear precedents, it is quite clear that they have no chance of winning in court.
Read OpIndia.com's response to the defamation notice served by Swati Chaturvedi

That you have lost readership and your peers doubt you, is not our problem: Read our response to Swati Chaturvedi’s defamation notice

Recently, OpIndia.com got a legal notice from abusive media troll Swati Chaturvedi. At the onset, we would like to reiterate that such intimidatory tactics won't work with OpIndia.

As Swati Chaturvedi mourns the loss of her imaginary credibility, her past faff pieces come to haunt her

Even though she wants to put the blame on us, we can't possibly be held responsible if Swati Chaturvedi's peers doubt her 'credibility'.

On press freedom day, meet the ‘fearless’ journalist who interviewed Rahul Gandhi and said ‘Rafale has entered people’s blood’

Now, as if the India Today interview fiasco wasn't bad enough, another pliant journalist has got the "once in a lifetime" opportunity to interview Rahul Gandhi.

Man masturbates on woman and abuses before running away: See Kejriwal? Free rides won’t guarantee safety

The daily harassment women face while commuting in the Delhi metro just shows how 'free metro ride' does not ensure safety.
CBI has registered an FIR against Lawyer's Collective and Anand Grover, Jaising's husband

CBI files FIR against Indira Jaising’s NGO for FCRA violations, husband Anand Grover named too

Earlier in May, Indira Jaising, Anand Grover and Lawyers' Collective were issued a notice by the Supreme Court.
Subscribe to Day's Top Stories
- Advertisment -

Latest articles

Connect with us

170,860FansLike
149,636FollowersFollow
69,822SubscribersSubscribe
Help Us Reach Every Indian, Please Share This Post