HomeNews ReportsThe IBC magic wand: Fearing govt action 2100 companies clear dues worth Rs 83000...

The IBC magic wand: Fearing govt action 2100 companies clear dues worth Rs 83000 crores, reports

Fearing action from the government under the newly enacted Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) for failing to repay their dues, 2100 companies have cleared dues worth Rs. 83000 crores, Times of India has reported. The majority of these dues have been cleared after the amendment of the IBC, however, it’s only a temporary relief as NPAs exceed Rs 7.31 lakh crores.

“The real success is the pressure on loan defaulters to clear dues. The borrowing and lending culture is changing because of IBC,” the report mentions an unnamed source as saying. The IBC will boost Arun Jaitley’s legacy as the Finance Minister of India who helped reform the debt-ridden Indian Banking system. Bankruptcy Board chief MS Sahoo told news agency PTI, “We have seen several instances where the corporate debtors have paid the default amount after trigger application is filed before the adjudicating authority but before its admission. Some of them pay up as soon as they receive a notice from an operational creditor.”

The Ordinance that sought to amend the IBC, which was approved by President Kovind last year, was introduced with the objective of preventing willful defaulters from bidding for stressed assets. The idea behind the Ordinance was to “put in place safeguards to prevent unscrupulous, undesirable persons from misusing or vitiating the provisions of the Code”. The move was praised even by Narendra Modi’s usual detractors, such as Stanley Pignal at the Economist, who said, “In the business section we focus on the bankruptcy code. It used to be Indian tycoons could borrow as much as they wanted & default with no fear of losing “their” companies. No more. The impact is potentially far-reaching. Early days but encouraging stuff.”

R Jagannathan, Editorial Director at Swarajya, wrote in praise of the government’s move following Tata Steel’s bid for Bhushan Steel, “A combination of good assets and bad balance sheets, which sent these companies to bankruptcy, has been rescued by a small turn in the commodity cycle and excellent performance by the bankruptcy courts, which have refused to delay settlements despite efforts to do so. This suggests that the system is turning a deaf ear to crony capitalists who usually get away with murder by using systemic delays. This is a qualitative change in the fight against crony capitalism.” Signs that IBC was starting to bear fruit became obvious when Tata Steel formally acquired control of Bhushan Steel at about Rs. 35,200 crores, which is nearly two-thirds of the money owed to lenders. And although the Banks have taken more than a 37% haircut, they can now classify the assets as standard, reducing their bad-loan burden. Furthermore, the Modi government is confident that it will be able to recover more than 1 lakh crore via the IBC.

Join OpIndia's official WhatsApp channel

  Support Us  

For likes of 'The Wire' who consider 'nationalism' a bad word, there is never paucity of funds. They have a well-oiled international ecosystem that keeps their business running. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

K Bhattacharjee
K Bhattacharjee
Black Coffee Enthusiast. Post Graduate in Psychology. Bengali.

Related Articles

Trending now

Madhya Pradesh HC rules that Bhojshala is a Saraswati Temple: Read about the archaeological, historical, scientific and administrative reasons cited in the landmark verdict

The High Court declared the disputed area a Bhojshala with Saraswati Temple, quashed the restrictive portions of the 2003 ASI order, and mandated the creation of a trust for temple administration and Sanskrit education

Arvind Kejriwal and his lackeys are lying, again: Justice Swarna Kanta Sharma didn’t ‘recuse’ herself, she transferred the case because she initiated contempt proceedings....

This episode focuses on a pattern, the weaponisation of public pressure against state institutions, particularly the judiciary. When people with large social media followings launch coordinated campaigns to delegitimise sitting judges, manufacture or manipulate evidence, and publicly refuse to participate in the judicial process, they are not practising Satyagraha. They are systematically undermining public trust in institutions that safeguard ordinary people far more than politicians.
- Advertisement -