HomeNews ReportsModi govt doesn't object to decriminalisation of homosexuality; Asks SC to take a call

Modi govt doesn’t object to decriminalisation of homosexuality; Asks SC to take a call

In a historic show of commitment towards progressive ideals, the Narendra Modi led central government has virtually stated that it has no objection regarding the decriminalisation of homosexuality.

In its response to a writ petition filed in the country’s apex court challenging the provision, Modi government has categorically stated that it would leave the matter to the wisdom of the Court, Times of India has reported.

The five-member bench consists of CJI Deepak Misra, Justice RF Nariman, Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice DY Chandrachud, and Justice Indu Malhotra.

The central government is being represented by Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta whereas the Senior Advocates Mukul Rohtagi and Arvind Datar are representing the petitioners in this case.

The point number six in the petition filed on behalf of the Union of India by additional solicitor general Tushar Mehta states that:

Point six of the petition filed on behalf of Union of India

“I state and submit that so far as the constitutional validity Section 377 to the extent it applies to ‘‘ constitutional acts of adults in private’’ is concerned, the Union of India would leave the said question to the wisdom of the this Hon’ble Court.”

However in the point seven of of the petition, the centre has not taken any other issue or rights into consideration. It thus asserted that if the supreme court would decide on any other issue besides section 377’s validity, it would have to file a counter petition owing to the far reaching ramifications.

As per the TOI report, the five-judge bench led by CJI Deepak Misra, in response to the petition stated that stated that it intends to rule- subject to arguments- that two consenting adults engage in ‘unnatural sex’ will not be liable for persecution for any offence. The bench hinted at the possibility of members of LGBT community being able to contest elections without any inhibition.

Join OpIndia's official WhatsApp channel

  Support Us  

For likes of 'The Wire' who consider 'nationalism' a bad word, there is never paucity of funds. They have a well-oiled international ecosystem that keeps their business running. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

OpIndia Staff
OpIndia Staffhttps://www.opindia.com
Staff reporter at OpIndia

Related Articles

Trending now

Wave of bomb blasts, shootings and arson shakes Southern Thailand: All you need to know about the Islamic insurgents suspected behind the attacks

The BRN has a long-standing demand to create an Islamic state by merging the three southern provinces and separating them from the Buddhist-majority country.

Live Law has a ‘Constitutional’ problem with government officials doing Bhumi Pujan in state functions: Does secularism mean de-Hinduisation?

The Live Law article headlined, “Can 'Culture' Justify Religious Rituals At State Functions? Constitutional Examination Of Bhumi Pujan Ceremonies” essentially frames Havan, Bhumi Pujan, coconut-breaking, and other such rituals at state events as ‘unconstitutional endorsement of Hinduism, that somehow violates the secularism, freedom of conscience, equality and democratic neutrality.
- Advertisement -