Wednesday, May 19, 2021
Home News Reports “Wrong and contemptuous to say that SC has allowed prosecution of Devendra Fadnavis”, Maharashtra...

“Wrong and contemptuous to say that SC has allowed prosecution of Devendra Fadnavis”, Maharashtra CMO rubbishes media reports

Contrary to media reports, the Supreme Court has not ordered the prosecution of Fadnavis, the court has only said that a trial court will hear the matter afresh to determine whether a case can be registered against him

Today several media houses reported that Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis has faced a setback as the Supreme Court has ruled that he will have to face trial for allegedly hiding details of criminal cases in his election affidavit. A bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi set aside the Bombay High Court order which had given a clean chit to Fadnavis, the media reports said, claiming that Supreme Court has ordered prosecution of the Maharashtra CM in the case.

But that is totally misleading claim by media, as the Supreme Court has not ordered the prosecution of Fadnavis, the court has only said that a trial court will hear the matter afresh to determine whether a case can be registered against him under the Representation of the People Act. Earlier, the trial court has dismissed the petition, after which the case reached Supreme Court going through the various states of appeals.

Reacting to the media reports saying that SC has allowed prosecution of the Chief Minister, the Chief Minister’s Office has said that it is wrong and contemptuous to say that Supreme Court has allowed prosecution of Devendra Fadnavis.

The complainant, advocate Satish Ukey, had filed a complaint with the First Class Judicial Magistrate in Nagpur that 2 cases, which were private complaints filed by one lawyer against CM, were not mentioned in the affidavit of CM. Ukey had filed the case with a demand to prosecute the CM for allegedly concealing the criminal cases in his election affidavit. The Trial court had dismissed the plea, after which Satish Ukey went to the Nagpur Sessions court. The Sessions Court had set aside the trial court judgement and had sent it back to the trial court for a de novo consideration, or for hearing it afresh.

This order of the Sessions Court was challenged by Devendra Fadnavis in the Bombay High court, and The High Court had set aside the order of the Sessions court in May 2018, saying no case is made out in this matter. After this, the complainant Satish Ukey went to the Supreme Court and now the Supreme Court has sent the case back to the trial court for fresh consideration. Hence it will again be heard in the trial court to ascertain whether a case for the prosecution is made out or not.

The two cases, which the Maharashtra CM didn’t mention in his affidavit, were filed against him in 1996 and 1998. Both of them were private complaints, and no charges have been filed in them. Giving details of the cases, the CMO statement says that in the early nineties when Devendra Fadnavis was corporator he had filed one complaint to the government to remove a Govt pleader and published it in the press, against which the lawyer went for a criminal definition against him. Later the defamation suit was withdrawn by the said lawyer.

The second case is about a slum, where Devendra Fadnavis as a corporator had given a letter to the corporation to apply tax on the slum properties. This land was under urban land ceiling dispute, and the same lawyer had filed a complaint against the corporation authorities and Devendra Fadnavis claiming that the land belongs to him. Later, this complaint was dismissed by the high court.

In both the cases, Fadnavis was acting in public interest and no private interest was involved, the CMO statement said. It claimed that “this judgement of SC has no bearing on Devendra Fadnavis to continue as public representative or to contest the next election”.

While ordering fresh hearing on the complaint against Fadnavis, the apex court said that Fadnavis had had knowledge of the two cases against him which had not been mentioned in the affidavit filed along with his nomination papers, therefore the orders of trial court and high court dismissing the complaint are not tenable, and the complaint of Satish Ukey will be considered afresh by the trial Court from the beginning.

  Support Us  

Whether NDTV or 'The Wire', they never have to worry about funds. In name of saving democracy, they get money from various sources. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

OpIndia Staff
Staff reporter at OpIndia

Related Articles

Trending now

Petition wants Delhi High Court to cancel Center’s approval for Covaxin to conduct trials for 2-18 age group

The petitioner wants Delhi High Court to quash govt notification allowing Covaxin trials for the 2-18 age group.

Congress may have rubbished the toolkit as ‘fake’ but there are enough reasons why people find it authentic

A toolkit was recently in circulation that highlighted the Congress party's devious attempts to tarnish the Modi government.

#CongressToolKitExposed: How Congress’s Srinivas BV’s actions during Covid crisis fits the toolkit perfectly

One of the first recommendations of this particular section of the 4-page toolkit suggests promoting SOS redressals and offering “priority help” to journalists, media professionals and other influencers.

Why Islamists and their apologists are desperate to insert ‘Jai Shri Ram’ to turn every random crime into hate crime

Ever since PM Modi came to power in 2014, the 'Dara Husa Musalman' bogey has been raised time and again in Indian context mostly to whitewash hate crimes carried out against Hindus

Washington Post cancels Iron Dome for saving Israeli lives

Should Israel just let its citizens die? Why should any country not use technology to save lives of its citizens?

West Bengal: Mamata Banerjee’s govt clears proposal to form a State Legislative Council. Here is why

The decision was taken during a cabinet meeting, conducted via video conferencing, by the CM and several Departmental Secretaries.

Recently Popular

Odisha: Sonu Sood clarifies after Ganjam DM says they had not received any communication from him regarding bed for COVID patient

The Collector and District Magistrate of Ganjam has called out Sonu Sood after the actor claimed to have arranged a bed.

Pakistan based CNN contributor Adeel Raja says world needs another Hitler amidst Israel-Palestine conflict, has history of anti-Semitic tweets

Adeel Raja, freelance contributor at CNN, has said that the world needs a Hitler today amidst the Israel-Palestine conflict.

Haryana: Police rules out communal angle in murder of Mewat youth Asif, two groups are old political rivals. Details

As per police, Asif had beaten up Pradeep's group members 20 days back, and Pradeep decided to avenge the attack.

Charity ‘toolkit’: How Sonu Sood’s foundation sought help from BJP’s Tejasvi Surya but took all the credit himself

Netizens have often raised suspicions that Sonu Sood had been falsely claiming credit for arranging help for Covid-19 patients without having done so.

Vinod Dua’s daughter, who wanted all ‘bhakts’ dead, receives help from a ‘bhakt’ MP while her mother needed critical COVID medicines

BJP supporters lodged their protest about minister chipping in to help the elites in India, when commoners are equally suffering, especially when the elites have not asked for their help.

Latest Congress toolkit: Paint Kumbh as Covid superspreader, and Eid as ‘happy gathering’. Here are the details

From maligning Kumbh to attacking Prime Minister Narendra Modi for the Central Vista project, working with 'friendly' journalists to get 'tailored' articles defaming India and Modi govt, here is what the Congress 'toolkit' asks its social media and PR teams to do.
- Advertisement -


Connect with us