HomeNews Reports'Supposed to guard the nation, protect integrity of its citizens': Kerala HC denies bail...

‘Supposed to guard the nation, protect integrity of its citizens’: Kerala HC denies bail to soldier Anwar Hussain who promised cash to 13-year-old boy for sex

"Being a soldier, the allegations against the petitioner have to be viewed more seriously. He is supposed to guard the nation and the dignity and integrity of the citizens," she observed in an order released on 5th January.

The Kerala High Court has rejected the bail plea of a 32-year-old soldier Anwar Hussain T from Lakshadweep’s Amini village who is accused of offering money to a 13-year-old boy in exchange for having sex with him and one of his friends. The single bench headed by Judge Sophy Thomas expressed that the charges against the bail applicant should be taken seriously because he is a soldier.

“Being a soldier, the allegations against the petitioner have to be viewed more seriously. He is supposed to guard the nation and the dignity and integrity of the citizens,” she observed in an order released on 5th January. Furthermore, the judge stated that the accusations were “unbecoming of a responsible military officer” and disgusting if established. The court proclaimed, “So, this court is not inclined to release the petitioner on bail at present considering the factual situations.”

The perpetrator and his accomplice enticed the minor boy to engage in an act of sodomy with them by offering him cash after which the former was arrested and sections 5b(iv)(aggravated penetrative sexual assault), 6 (punishment for aggravated penetrative sexual assault), 11(iv)(sexual harassment), 12 (punishment for sexual harassment) and 18 (punishment for attempt to commit an offence) of the POCSO (Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses) Act were invoked against him last year.

The victim’s family filed a police report in the case in 2023. The culprit, however, informed the court that he was at odds with the family members of the young boy and was being trapped in a family feud by them. He submitted bail under Code of Criminal Procedure section 439 which deals with the high court’s or court of session’s exceptional powers over bail.

This argument was refuted by the prosecution who asserted that the case’s investigation was still ongoing. It contended that the probe and the boy’s security could be jeopardized if the offender is freed on bond. The bench denied the bail request after considering these grounds.

Join OpIndia's official WhatsApp channel

  Support Us  

For likes of 'The Wire' who consider 'nationalism' a bad word, there is never paucity of funds. They have a well-oiled international ecosystem that keeps their business running. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

OpIndia Staff
OpIndia Staffhttps://www.opindia.com
Staff reporter at OpIndia

Related Articles

Trending now

‘BJP swallows its allies’: Old accusation is back after Annamalai’s departure, but It’s the allies who backstabbed BJP first

Despite Annamalai leaving the party, it does not prove that BJP abandons its leaders or allies. History shows BJP’s coalition politics has been the strategy of taking allies along.

As Congress and AAP fight to take credit for developing the ‘education sector’ of Punjab, read how Arvind Kejriwal was accused of passing Sheila...

While AAP has claimed credit for Punjab’s rise in the education sector, the timeline suggests the state’s improvement may have begun before the party came to power in 2022. The AAP government was sworn in in March 2022. But some key surveys or studies have cited the data prior to 2022. It raises the question: Does the AAP government deserve the actual credit, or are they riding on someone else's work? 
- Advertisement -