Home Blog Page 1659

No adoption rights for LGBTQ+ couples: Supreme Court rules in a 3-2 verdict while delivering its verdict on same-sex marriage plea

OpIndia Staff
-
0
No adoption rights for LGBTQ+ couples: Supreme Court rules in a 3-2 verdict while delivering its verdict on same-sex marriage plea

On Tuesday, October 17, the 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court, presided by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, in a 3-2 verdict ruled that Queer couples cannot be granted the right to jointly adopt a child.

Notably, the five-judge bench differed on the applicability of adoption rules for non-heterosexual couples. While Chief Justice DY Chandrachud and Justice Sanjay Kaul asserted that queer couples should be given adoption rights, Justices Ravindra Bhat, Hima Kohli, and PS Narasimha disagreed.

Chief Justice of India, DY Chandrachud, while reading out the verdict on same-sex marriage, said that the Central Adoption Resource Authority (CARA) circular, which denies adoption rights to queer couples, is “violative of Article 15 of the Constitution”.

“CARA Regulation 5(3) indirectly discriminates against atypical unions. A queer person can adopt only in an individual capacity. This has the effect of reinforcing the discrimination against the queer community,” he said, adding, “There is no material on record to prove that only a married heterosexual couple can provide stability to a child.”

While the CJI supported the adoption rights and scrapping of CARA Regulation 5(3), three judges dissented from the proposal effectively nullifying the possibility of adoption for non-heterosexual couples.

Supreme Court refuses to legalise same-sex marriage

On Tuesday, October 17, the Supreme Court delivered its verdict on a clutch of petitions demanding the legalisation of same-sex marriage. The apex court bench of Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, S Ravindra Bhat, Hima Kohli, and PS Narasimha, have refused to recognise same-sex marriage as legal in India.

In a 3-2 verdict, the apex court opinioned that there was no constitutional or fundamental right to civil unions. It left it for the Parliament and State legislature to decide whether same-sex marriage should be given legal status and to formulate legislation on it.

The apex court also refused to strike down Special Marriage Act and Foreign Marriage Act for not recognizing queer marriages. It recorded the statement of the Union that it will constitute a Committee to examine the rights and benefits which can be given to queer couples.

Brussels terrorist attack: ISIS terrorist who killed 2 Swedish football fans in the Belgian capital shot dead by the police

OpIndia Staff
-
0
Brussels terrorist attack: ISIS terrorist who killed 2 Swedish football fans in the Belgian capital shot dead by the police

On 17th October, the Belgian authorities informed media that they have shot dead the suspect who carried out the Brussels terror attack killing two Swedish football fans and injuring a third individual.  

Speaking with AFP, Spokesman Eric Van Duyse added that officers “opened fire” as they apprehended the man in the Schaerbeek area of the city. However, Duyse did not specify if the suspect was killed. Citing local media reports, several social media handles said that the ISIS terrorist succumbed to bullet wounds, however, authorities at the time did not specified whether he got fatally wounded during a manhunt launched after the terrorist attack. 

As per BBC, the Brussels police shot a man in a café in the Schaerbeek neighbourhood citing local media and he succumbed to his injuries. Belgian Interior Minister Annelies Verlinden noted that the person who was shot was likely to be the suspect. According to Flemish public broadcaster VRT, Verlinden added that the automatic weapon found on him was the same as the one used in Monday’s attack.

Earlier, Van Duyse asserted that the murder investigation was centering on “a possible terrorist motivation for the shooting” after “a claim of responsibility was posted on social media.”

Van Duyse said, “This person claims to be inspired by Islamic State. The Swedish nationality of the victims was put forward as the probable motive.” 

It is important to note that in August, Sweden had raised its terror alert to the second-highest level after a spree of public Quran-burnings cases were reported in the country. The alleged incident was reportedly carried out by an Iraqi refugee living in Sweden which resulted in threats from Islamic militant groups. 

However, Van Duyse stated that at this time, no element indicates a possible link with the Israeli-Palestinian situation. 

Belgian authorities have called it an act of Terrorism

Hours earlier, on 16th October (local time), an ISIS terrorist killed two Swedish nationals and injured a third person in Brussels, Belgium. The authorities later declared it as an act of terrorism. As per media reports, the assailant is an Tunisian refugee who reportedly had a history of criminal records there.

Amid the terror attack, the Belgium-Sweden Euro 2024 qualifier football match that was being played in the city was abandoned at half time. The victims were reportedly wearing the Swedish national team’s football shirts. Following the incident, Swedish footballers informed they did not want to play the second half, to which the Belgian team agreed. For some time, around 35,000 fans that were present at the stadium were asked to remain inside for safety. Later, the authorities evacuated them.

Belgian federal prosecutor spokesperson Eric Van Duyse stated that the terrorist published a video on social media and said the Islamic State terrorist group inspired him.

In the video in Arabic, the terrorist, who identified himself as Abdesalem Al Guilani, said that he carried out the attack in the name of Allah and killed three people. He said, “Allahu Akbar. My name is Abdesalem Al Guilani, and I am a fighter for Allah. I am from the Islamic State. We love who loves us, and we hate who hates us. We live for our religion, and we die for our religion, Alhamdulilah. Your brother took revenge in the name of Muslims. I have killed 3 Swedes so far Alhamdulilah. 3 Swedish, yes. Those to whom I have done something wrong, may they forgive me and I forgive everyone. Salam Aleykoum.”

‘Decision outside court’s remit’: Supreme Court refuses to legalise same-sex marriage, leaves the decision on the Parliament

OpIndia Staff
-
0
‘Decision outside court’s remit’: Supreme Court refuses to legalise same-sex marriage, leaves the decision on the Parliament

On Tuesday, October 17, the Supreme Court delivered its verdict on a clutch of petitions demanding the legalisation of same-sex marriage. The apex court bench of Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, S Ravindra Bhat, Hima Kohli, and PS Narasimha, have refused to recognise same-sex marriage as legal in India.

In a 3-2 verdict, the apex court opinioned that there was no constitutional or fundamental right to civil unions. It left it for the Parliament and State legislature to decide whether same-sex marriage should be given legal status and to formulate legislation on it.

The apex court also refused to strike down Special Marriage Act and Foreign Marriage Act for not recognizing queer marriages. It recorded the statement of the Union that it will constitute a Committee to examine the rights and benefits which can be given to queer couples.

Chief Justice Dhananjaya Yeshwant Chandrachud said that it was outside the court’s remit to decide the issue and that parliament should write the laws governing marriage. “The court, in the exercise of the power of judicial review, must steer clear of matters, particularly those impinging on policy, which fall in the legislative domain.”

While delivering the verdict the CJI had opinioned that the court cannot make law, it can only interpret it. “It’s the Parliament’s decision if it wants to bring about a change in the Special Marriage Act. The court has not gone into any other laws except the Special Marriage Act,” he said, adding that the SC can’t hold the Special Marriage Act unconstitutional just because it doesn’t recognize same-sex marriages. Also, it cannot compel Parliament or state assemblies to create a new institution of marriage.

The CJI added if the Special Marriage Act is struck down, it will take the country to the pre-Indpendence era. Weaving words into the SMA would amount to entering the realm of the legislature. The court is not equipped to do that, he said.

The CJI while delivering his verdict directed the Union, state governments and UTs to ensure there is no discrimination against the queer community. He said that the government should sensitise the public about queer rights, create a hotline for the queer community and create safe houses or garima grihas for them. Further, he said that the government should ensure inter-sex children are not forced to undergo sex change operations.

He added that the police should not harass the queer persons by summoning them to police stations, to enquire about their identity. They will also not force queer persons to return to their natal families if they do not wish to. A preliminary enquiry must be conducted before registering an FIR against a queer couple over their relationship.

Supreme Court Bar Association president Adish Aggarwala welcomed the top court’s judgment which ruled against legally recognising same-sex marriage in India. 

On May 11, after a marathon 10-day hearing, a five-judge constitution bench presided over by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud reserved its decision on the appeals. The other members of the bench are Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, S Ravindra Bhat, Hima Kohli, and PS Narasimha.

The court had made it abundantly clear that the proceedings would only concern the legal recognition of same-sex marriages within the fold of the Special Marriage Act (SMA) and would not touch the personal laws on this aspect.

The petitioners, during the course of the hearing, had argued that, “India is a marriage-based culture” and that LGBTQIA+ couples should be granted the same rights as any heterosexual couples have, like the status of “spouse” in finance and insurance issues; medial, inheritance, and succession decisions, and even in adoption and surrogacy matters.

One of the petitioners of LGBTQIA+ marriage, Akkai Padmashali had said before the apex court,”…The resistance from the heterosexual people, not all, but almost everyone was objecting to marriages of LGBTQI…today the whole country is set to hear the judgement…people’s eyes are on the Supreme Court. I identify myself as a woman and if I want to marry a man with his consent then what is the business of society in this?..people have the right to make their own choices when it comes to marriage…I hope the judgement won’t be disappointing”.

Centre’s stand on the demand for legalisation of same-sex marriage

It may be recalled that the central government has opposed the petitions.

Centre, in its affidavit, had opposed the plea seeking legal recognition of same-sex marriage, saying that living together as partners by same-sex individuals, which is decriminalised now, is not comparable with the Indian family unit and they are clearly distinct classes that cannot be treated identically. 

The Centre filed the affidavit countering the demand made by various petitioners seeking legal recognition of same-sex marriage. In the affidavit, Centre has opposed the plea and said that pleas seeking legal recognition of same-sex ought to be dismissed as there exists no merit in these petitions.

Centre on April 18 issued a letter to States, asking them to give their opinion on the issues relating to Same-sex marriage.

States of Assam, Andhra Pradesh and Rajasthan have opposed the legal recognition of same-sex marriages in the country whereas Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, Manipur and Sikkim sought more time to give their opinion on the same-sex marriage issue

 

UP: Hindu woman sexually assaulted, forced to convert to Islam by Sajid Qureshi, accused arrested

OpIndia Staff
-
0
UP: Hindu woman sexually assaulted, forced to convert to Islam by Sajid Qureshi, accused arrested

A case of love jihad has come to the fore from the Firozabad district of Uttar Pradesh. The state police on Sunday (15th October) arrested a person identified as Sajid Qureshi for trapping a Hindu woman in a love affair and then forcing her to convert her religion to Islam. The accused has also been booked for sexually assaulting the woman.

According to a report by Dainik Bhasker, the incident is said to have happened in the Sirsaganj region of Uttar Pradesh’s Firozabad district. The victim woman is a divorcee and has been staying with her parents in Sirsaganj. The accused, a resident of the nearby region in the district approached the woman and became friends with her. After a few months, he asked the woman to accompany him to his house where he treated her like his ‘wife’.

He promised the woman that he would marry her on September 23. Under the guise of fake promises, he is said to have sexually assaulted the woman. The woman then pressed the accused for marriage but he forced the woman to convert her religion to Islam.

The accused clarified that marriage would only be possible if the woman converted her religion to Islam. He also threatened the family members of the woman and forced them to convince the woman to change her religion.

The mother of the victim commented on the issue and confirmed that the accused had threatened the woman to convert her religion. “He also issued death threats to us and said that he would marry the woman after she would convert her religion. He also threatened us saying that he would forcefully marry the woman,” she added.

PI Akhilesh Dixit took cognizance of the event and booked accused Sajid Qureshi under the relevant sections of the law. The accused has also been arrested by the Police and is being interrogated. Further investigations into the case are underway.

Earlier in September, a similar case was reported from Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh where a girl was entrapped in Love Jihad by Abu Aamir Ansari who pretended to be a Hindu man named Amit. He first pretended to be a Hindu boy named Amit, after which he brainwashed, married and forced her to embrace Islam.

Also, on 13th October, a Hindu girl was harassed and forced to convert her religion to Islam. A Muslim man named Afzal Siddiqui first lured a Hindu girl into a love trap and then blackmailed the victim using her explicit videos. He then forced her to abort the baby after she became pregnant and pressured her to convert to Islam.

In the current case, the accused Sajid Qureshi has been booked under the relevant sections of the law. The accused has also been arrested by the Police and is being interrogated. Further investigations into the case are underway.

‘India will soon be among top 3 world economies’: PM Modi says at Global Maritime India Summit, lays foundation for projects worth over 18,000 crores

ANI
-
0
‘India will soon be among top 3 world economies’: PM Modi says at Global Maritime India Summit, lays foundation for projects worth over 18,000 crores

 Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Tuesday said the day is not far when India will be among the top three global economies, adding that everyone was looking at India in the hope that it will lead the efforts for a new world order.

Inaugurating the three-day Global Maritime India Summit in the national capital on Tuesday, PM Modi said, “In this changing world order, the whole world is looking towards India with new aspirations. The Indian economy is gathering more strength while the world is in the grip of an economic crisis. The day is not far when India will be one of the top three economic powers of the world.”

Underlining the importance of the country’s maritime sector, PM Modi said, “History bears witness that whenever India’s maritime capability has been strong, the country and the world have benefited greatly from it. Taking this as our guiding principle, we have been working in a planned manner for the last 9 years to strengthen this sector.”

PM Modi stated further that the maritime industry will be boosted to no end once the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor comes to be implemented.

“Recently, during the G20 Summit, a historic consensus was reached on forming an India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor. This is a huge step at India’s initiative, which could potentially rejuvenate the maritime industry across the world in the 21st century,” PM Modi said.

He also laid the foundation stone for projects worth Rs 18,800 crore.

He laid the foundation stone for the Tuna Tekra all-weather deep draft terminal, which is to come up at a cost of more than Rs. 4,500 crore at Deendayal Port Authority in Gujarat. The state-of-the-art greenfield terminal will be developed on the public-private partnership (PPP) model.

He also unveiled the ‘Amrit Kaal Vision 2047’ for the Indian maritime blue economy. The summit is the biggest Maritime Event hosted in the country. The first Maritime India summit was held in 2016 in Mumbai while the second was held virtually in 2021.
The third summit will be held from October 17 to 19 at MMRDA Grounds in Mumbai.

The three-day summit will discuss and deliberate key issues of the maritime sector including ports of the future; decarbonisation; coastal shipping and inland water transportation; shipbuilding; repair and recycling; finance, insurance & arbitration; maritime clusters; innovation & technology; maritime safety and security, and maritime tourism, among others.

The summit will also provide a platform for attracting investment in the maritime sector of the country.

(This news report is published from a syndicated feed. Except for the headline, the content has not been written or edited by OpIndia staff)

More trouble for Harvard over pro-Hamas letter by student organisations, billionaire Idan Ofer and Wexner Foundation cut ties with the University

OpIndia Staff
-
0
More trouble for Harvard over pro-Hamas letter by student organisations, billionaire Idan Ofer and Wexner Foundation cut ties with the University

Harvard University’s tepid response to the controversial student union coalition letter blaming Israel for the Hamas terrorist attack has made Israeli billionaire Idan Ofer and the Wexner Foundation to cut ties with the varsity.

Idan Ofer and his wife Batia announced their decision to resign from a Harvard executive board saying that their “faith in the University’s leadership has been broken” and that they “cannot in good faith continue to support Harvard and its committees.”

“We denounce those who seek to place blame on the people of Israel for the atrocities committed by the terrorist organisation, Hamas,” the Ofers reportedly said.

Although Harvard University President Claudine Gay eventually distanced the university from the outrageous statement signed by the student groups, the Ofers asserted that the University administration did not make its support for the people of Israel amidst Hamas terrorist attacks evident. Moreover, the billionaire couple said that Harvard has been “unwilling” to call Hamas a terrorist organisation.

“Our decision to resign from the board has been precipitated by the lack of clear evidence of support from the University’s leadership for the people of Israel following the tragic events of the past week, coupled with their apparent unwillingness to recognize Hamas for what it is, a terrorist organization,” the billionaire couple said.

According to the Ofers, in the face of rampant disinformation on social media, it is critical for the world’s greatest institutions to make a clear and unequivocal statement.

“With so much disinformation being spread by social media it is essential that the world’s great institutions speak with a clear and unequivocal voice at this critical time,” the Ofers said.

Idan Ofer, who has an estimated net worth of $19.9 billion, amassed his wealth through his ownership of a majority 51% stake in the conglomerate Israel Corp., which deals in chemicals, energy, and shipping.

Wexner Foundation cuts ties with Harvard

On Monday (16th October), the Wexner Foundation announced its decision to end a 34-year-old partnership with Harvard and the Harvard Kennedy School over Harvard’s “dismal failure” to take a clear and unequivocal stand against Hamas’s barbaric terrorist attacks on 7th October.

In a letter to the Board of Overseers at Harvard Monday, the Wexner Foundation President Elka Abrahamson, Director General Ra’anan Avital, and chairmen Abigail S. Wexner and Leslie H. Wexner criticised University President Claudine Gay’s response to the controversial statement issued by Harvard student groups.

“We are stunned and sickened at the dismal failure of Harvard’s leadership to take a clear and unequivocal stand against the barbaric murders of innocent Israeli civilians by terrorists last Saturday, the Sabbath and a festival day,” the letter by the philanthropic organisation read.

Notably, the Wexner Foundation, the Jewish leadership philanthropy was established by the founder of Victoria’s Secret and billionaire retailer, Leslie Wexner.

“Harvard’s leaders were indeed tiptoeing, equivocating, and we, like former Harvard President Larry Summers cannot fathom the administration’s failure to disassociate the university and condemn the statement swiftly issued by 34 student groups holding Israel entirely responsible for the violent terror attack on its own citizens. That should not have been that hard,” the letter continued.

The foundation further stated that “in the absence of clear moral stand” the Wexner Foundation and Harvard Kennedy School do not remain compatible partners adding that the core values of the foundation and HKS “no longer align.”

Prior to this, corporate leaders including Bill Ackman, CEO of Pershing Square, announced last week that their companies would not hire those students who signed the pro-Hamas statement. As many prominent firms announced their decision not to consider hiring the signatories of the said joint statement, several of the signatories withdrew their signatures from the statement.

This comes after a student union coalition at Harvard University issued a statement on 7th October blaming Israel for the ongoing Israel-Hamas war. The letter issued by the Harvard Palestine Solidarity Groups was co-signed by 33 student groups.

“The apartheid regime is the only one to blame. Israeli violence has structured every aspect of Palestinian existence for 75 years. From systematized land seizures to routine airstrikes, arbitrary detentions to military checkpoints, and enforced family separations to targeted killings, Palestinians have been forced to live in a state of death, both slow and sudden,” the letter read.

George Soros’ NGO empire facing downsizing? OSF to cut 40% staff worldwide to concentrate on specific ‘target areas’

OpIndia Staff
-
0
George Soros’ NGO empire facing downsizing? OSF to cut 40% staff worldwide to concentrate on specific ‘target areas’

On October 12, controversial billionaire George Soros’s Open Society Foundation (OSF) announced that it would close multiple offices worldwide. The organisation is also in the process of staff reduction. Notably, the OSF aims to cut over 40% of its staff. It is believed that the organisation would concentrate on “targetted areas”.

In an email to its employees, OSF’s vice president of programs, Binaifer Nowrojee, said that the board decision from June mandated a reduction of staff and a decrease in the number of operational locations. Most of the closed offices are in Africa, and two are in Baltimore and Barcelona.

The offices that are going to be affected by the decision include Addis Ababa in Ethiopia, Kampala in Uganda, Cape Town, Kinshasa in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Abuja in Nigeria and Freetown in Sierra Leone. Offices that will remain open are in Nairobi in Kenya, Dakar in Senegal and Johannesburg. OSF has been working on the reconstruction of its works since 2021, and the organisation expects it to be largely completed by the end of 2023.

Notably, the restructuring of the staff will end up bringing it down to almost 500 from 1,700 in 2021. The organisation claimed that it wanted to shift from extensive due diligence before making grants to a greater focus on the impact of the grants, which will require a smaller staff.

Furthermore, it would adopt a new “opportunity” model of operations with unclear details. Those who were affected by the cuts in Africa were invited to apply for roles within their jurisdiction. However, they can only apply if they would relocate at their own expense.

Notably, in August this year, OSF announced that it would significantly reduce its funding within the European Union. However, the organisation pointed out that would not mean it would be leaving Europe.

The OSF at that time proposed an 80% cut of staff in Berlin, at least 60% in Brussels, and an unspecified number in London. The strategic chances were in sync with the model suggested by Alex Soros, George’s son, who took over as head of OSF’s board this year.

At that time, the critics claimed that OSF was committing a “strategic mistake” by reducing support for human rights, political participation, and digital protections in the European Union, considering the Russia-Ukraine war, the rise of far-right governments, and more. Furthermore, they claimed that it would create opportunities for conservative philanthropies to support anti-abortion and anti-LGBT rights organisations in Europe.

Soros’s org is unwelcomed in his home country

Notably, Soros’s organisation is unwelcome in his home country Hungary due to concerns over its involvement in illegal immigration. The Hungarian government, led by Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, passed the “Stop Soros” law in 2018 to limit Soros’s influence. The law criminalises aid to illegal immigrants and restricts the role of NGOs in asylum cases. Despite opposition from the European Union, Orbán remained resolute in his anti-immigration stance, considering it a cultural and civilisational issue.

Geroge Soros wants to topple Modi-led government

In February 2023, George Soros inadvertently revealed what we have known for a long time – that the billionaire is eyeing a ‘colour revolution’ in India. The term ‘colour revolutions’ originated from a series of popular uprisings in the early 2000s in Eastern Europe following the fall of communism.

It has since been used to describe similar movements in the Middle East and Asia. The protests often involve mass demonstrations calling for free and fair elections or for the removal of authoritarian leaders. These types of uprisings have been criticised as foreign-instigated attempts to destabilise regimes for the benefit of Western powers.

George Soros and his vicious ecosystem of NGOs, activists and journalists had been trying to prove PM Modi as an ‘electoral autocrat’ who needed to be ousted for this country’s ‘greater good’. And it has been a work in progress for a long time.

The Hungarian-American billionaire has several intellectuals on his payroll, including the former PM Manmohan Singh’s daughter Amrita Singh. Not to forget the curious case of ‘author’ and ‘social activist’ Harsh Mander, who had been at the forefront of creating civil unrest during the Anti-CAA protests.

In 2018, George Soros-funded NGO Sherpa attempted to thwart India’s defence deal with France and stall the delivery of Rafale fighter jets.

Moreover, Open Society Foundations (OSF) run by the billionaire had funded the Socio-Legal Information Centre (SLIC), which had been active in seeking the repeal of the sedition law currently used against anti-India elements.

‘Israel has agreed to allow humanitarian aid into Gaza’, Antony Blinken informs, says Biden’s visit is to ensure minimum civilian casualties

ANI
-
0
‘Israel has agreed to allow humanitarian aid into Gaza’, Antony Blinken informs, says Biden’s visit is to ensure minimum civilian casualties

United States State Secretary Antony Blinken said that Israel has agreed to establish a humanitarian aid plan to ensure that civilians in Gaza would get access to help provided by other countries and protect them from the destruction of war in a way that does not benefit Hamas.

“Today, at our request, the United States and Israel have agreed to develop a plan that will enable humanitarian aid from donor nations and multilateral organizations to reach civilians in Gaza, including the possibility of creating areas to help keep civilians out of harm’s way,” Antony Blinken, who is in Israel shared on X.

Addressing a press conference here on Tuesday, Blinken said that US President Joe Biden will visit Israel on Wednesday at a time when the country is facing its toughest battle with the terrorist group Hamas.

Blinken noted that Biden will receive a comprehensive brief on Israel’s war aims and strategy. “The President will hear from Israel how it will conduct its operations in a way that minimizes civilian casualties and enables humanitarian assistance to flow to civilians in Gaza in a way that does not benefit Hamas.”

“US President Joe Biden will visit Israel on Wednesday. He is coming here at a critical moment for Israel, for the region, and for the world. President Biden will reaffirm the United States’ solidarity with Israel. President Biden will again make clear, as he’s done unequivocally since Hamas’s slaughter of more than 1,400 people, including at least 30 Americans, that Israel has the right and indeed the duty to defend its people from Hamas and other terrorists and to prevent future attacks,” he said.

He added that Biden will continue to coordinate closely with the Israeli partners to secure the release of hostages taken by Hamas.
To that end, today and at our request, the United States and Israel have agreed to develop a plan that will enable humanitarian aid from donor nations and multilateral organizations to reach civilians in Gaza and them alone, including the possibility of creating areas to help keep civilians out of harm’s way. It is critical that aid begins flowing into Gaza as soon as possible,” he said.

“If Hamas in any way blocks humanitarian assistance from reaching civilians, including by seizing the aid itself, we’ll be the first to condemn it, and we will work to prevent it from happening again,” Blinken said.

Meanwhile, the White House also issued a statement on President Biden’s visit to Israel.

“President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. will travel to Israel on Wednesday, October 18, to demonstrate his steadfast support for Israel in the face of Hamas’s brutal terrorist attack and to consult on next steps,” the White House said.

Earlier today, the US Defence Department reiterated its full support to Israel at the time of war and said that the US Secretary of Defence is in continuous touch with the Israel authorities and leaders.

The statement from the US Department of Defence (DOD) said in a statement, “Since meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Defense Minister Yoav Gallant and members of the Israeli War Cabinet in Tel Aviv on Friday, Austin has remained fully engaged with the country’s leaders as the US works ensure Israel has what it needs to defend itself from further attacks.”

In the statement, Pentagon Deputy Press Secretary Sabrina Singh shared, “Since leaving Israel, he has held calls with MOD Gallant … on a near daily basis and will likely have another call today”.

He added, “We are working to meet Israel’s needs, which include air defence, precision-guided munitions, artillery and medical supplies.”

In addition to quickly fielding U.S. aid to Israel, the U.S. has bolstered its presence in the region to deter further aggression.
Over the weekend, Austin directed the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower Carrier Strike Group to join the USS Gerald R. Ford Carrier Strike Group which arrived in the Eastern Mediterranean last week.

The Navy units are part of a broader bolstering of US forces in the region. Last week, the Air Force announced the deployment of F-15 and F-16 fighter squadrons and A-10 attack squadrons to the region, according to a US Department of Defence press release.

“The increases to U.S. force posture signal the United States’ ironclad commitment to Israel’s security and our resolve to deter any state or non-state actor seeking to escalate this war,” Austin said in a statement over the weekend.

Singh noted that the U.S. is also providing planning and intelligence support to the Israeli-led hostage recovery efforts following last week’s attack.

That support includes a “small number of personnel in support of this effort as augmentation to the embassy staff,” Singh said.
“As the president stated, any presence of military personnel will be to advise and consult on hostage recovery efforts,” she said.
Singh said DOD remains focused on supporting Israel’s defenses, containing the conflict in Gaza, deterring other state or non-state actors from entering the battle space and protecting U.S. forces.

During his visit to Tel Aviv last week, Austin condemned the “bloodthirsty, fanatical and hateful” attacks by Hamas terrorists.
“The world has just witnessed a great evil: the deadliest attack on civilians in the history of the state of Israel and the bloodiest day in Jewish history since the end of the Holocaust,” Austin said after meeting with Israeli officials.

“So, make no mistake: The United States will make sure that Israel has what it needs to defend itself,” he said. Austin said U.S. support to Israel remains “non-negotiable” and that additional security assistance would continue to “flow at the speed of war.”

“For any country, for any group or anyone thinking about trying to take advantage of this atrocity to try to widen the conflict or to spill more blood, we have just one word: Don’t,” Austin said.

“The world is watching,” he said. “So are we. And we aren’t going anywhere.”

(This news report is published from a syndicated feed. Except for the headline, the content has not been written or edited by OpIndia staff)

Mahua Moitra asked questions against Adani to favour Hiranandani after getting bribes, says advocate: Here is a list of what she asked and the response by govt

Anurag
-
0
Mahua Moitra asked questions against Adani to favour Hiranandani after getting bribes, says advocate: Here is a list of what she asked and the response by govt

On 15th October, Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) Lok Sabha MP Nishikant Dubey levelled serious allegations against Trinamool MP Mahua Moitra. Based on the complaint filed by advocate Jai Anant Dehadrai, Dubey alleged that businessman Darshan Hiranandani paid for most of the questions asked by Moitra in the Lok Sabha in cash and gifts.

OpIndia accessed a copy of the complaint filed by adv Dehadrai and cross-checked the questions mentioned in the list that Dehadrai alleged were to benefit Hiranandani. Here is what these questions were and how they could have benefited the Hiranandani Group.

Regarding Paradip Port targeting MoU between Adani, GAIL and IOC-H-Energy

The first question asked by Mahua Moitra was in July 2019 regarding Paradip port. The question targeted the MoU between Adani, GAIL and IOC-H-Energy. It was alleged that a Hiranandani group company was an interested party as it won a bid for the Paradip natural gas pipeline. [PDF of the question]

In the question to the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Moitra asked to clarify the circumstances surrounding Gas Authority of India Limited (GAIL) initially signing an MoU with Paradip Port Trust for a gas terminal. It was later abandoned in 2015. Furthermore, she sought information regarding GAIL and Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOC)’s partnership with a private entity to acquire stakes in Dhamra Port, which was significantly costlier than the Paradip Port project.

The ministry informed GAIL that it conducted a feasibility study in 2012 to establish an FSRU project on the east coast of India. Two potential locations near Dhamra Port and Paradip Port were shortlisted. An MoU was signed with Paradip Port Trust in 2013, but in 2015, it was decided that setting up two competing LNG terminals in such close proximity would not be financially viable. A non-binding MoU was signed in 2016 between Adani Petroleum Terminal, Dhamra LNG Terminal, IOCL, and GAIL. Still, the MoU expired in 2018 and did not involve capital expenditure from GAIL and IOCL.

Regarding service quality of telecom service providers

In November 2019, Moitra asked a question about the service quality of telecom service providers. Notably, a Hiranandani company named Yotta had hired a Jio executive a day after the question was raised. [PDF of the question]

In her question, she asked the ministry to provide the stats on the quality of the service offered by the Telecom Service Providers (TSPs) in India. The information was sought for the past three years, broken down by state, UT and TSP. She also sought historical data on call drop rates along with the percentage of calls with good voice quality classified by TSP and location.

TRAI has been monitoring telecom service providers through Quality of Service regulations. They now assess the performance of Cellular Mobile Services together for a License Service Area. The ministry provided detailed statistics for the last three years.

Regarding the handling capacity of Kolkata Port Trust

In November 2019, Moitra asked a question regarding the handling capacity of Kolkata Port Trust. Notably, the Hiranadani group had entered into a MoU with KPT, and therefore, it was an interested party in the matter. [PDF of the question]

She asked the Ministry of Shipping to provide details on the cargo volume and revenue that KPT earned categorised by cargo type. Furthermore, she sought information regarding the measures that were in place or planned by KPT to promote port development alongside Hooghly waterfront.

The ministry shared revenue details and clarified that the Kolkata Port Trust’s conservancy jurisdiction extends up to 45.7 meters from the high-water mark during Spring Tide. However, not all of this area is owned by the port trust. The port trust has developed facilities in Haldia, Salukkhali, and Howrah and encourages private entities to use their riverfront land for shipbreaking at Kulpi.

Regarding check posts along the India-Bangladesh border

In December 2019, Moitra asked the Ministry of Home Affairs about the check posts alongside the India-Bangladesh border. Notably, the Hiranandani Group has a significant investment in Bangladesh, making the group an alleged beneficiary in the query. [PDF of the question]

The MP asked the ministry to provide information on the expansion of integrated check posts between West Bengal and Bangladesh. She also asked to include information on the progress of each project. Furthermore, she sought information regarding the status of the agreement between India and Bangladesh to enable the free movement of trucks to enhance trade.

The ministry informed that India established an Integrated Check Post (ICP) at Petrapole in West Bengal in Feb 2016. The government approved five more ICPs in Dec 2018. The ICPs are to be established at Ghojadanga, Changrabandha, Fulbari, Mahadipur, and Hili. The West Bengal government assessed land availability. In June 2015, Bhutan, Bangladesh, India, and Nepal signed a Motor Vehicle Agreement to facilitate vehicle movement.

Regarding the agreement between a private entity, Paradip Post and GAIL

In December 2019, she raised a question regarding the agreement between a private entity, Paradip Port and GAIL. She questioned if the CVC guidelines were followed for the tendering process. Notably, the allegations were repeated in the Hindenburg report. Furthermore, the Hirandani Group has been trying to connect ports on the east coast with Bangladesh. The presence of Adani Group, the private entity, in the area hinders Hiranandani’s plans. [PDF of the question]

Her inquiry aimed to gather information on whether any agreements worth Rs. 46,500 crore were made with a private entity after long techno-commercial negotiations. If such agreements exist, she asked for the name of the entity and the procurement guidelines of the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) that were followed. Furthermore, she sought details on an agreement between GAIL and the government-owned Paradip Port for a Rs. 2,500 crore project, including the reasons behind the agreement.

The Ministry informed that Central Public Sector Enterprises (CPSEs) needed to follow the government, Department of Public Enterprises, and Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) guidelines while awarding contracts or making agreements. However, in the case of GAIL, there was no binding agreement signed with the Board of Trustees of the Paradeep Port Trust (PPT) for the project. Instead, a non-binding Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was signed on 26th October 2013, which later expired on 26th January 2017.

Regarding KPT’s jurisdiction on waterway

In March 2020, Moitra asked another question regarding Kolkata Port Trust. Hiranandani Group has an agreement with the KPT. [PDF of the question]

In her question, she sought information regarding the jurisdiction of KPT over a substantial waterway. She questioned if the policies and procedures of KPT hindered the development of ports alongside the Hooghly River Waterfront. She also asked if KPT had limited land for the future development of the ports and what steps the Ministry of Shipping was taking to ensure KPT and the Inland Waterways Authority of India were aligned to promote development in the area.

The ministry informed that Kolkata Port Trust has enough land for further port activities, and it’s strategically located on National Waterway-1. Over three years, they awarded 14 projects worth Rs 1,902.95 crores, increasing its capacity to 82.57 MTPA. It generated a net surplus of Rs 65 crores after a 10-year gap.

Regarding 5G readiness in the country

In February 2021, she asked a question about the 5G readiness of the country. Notably, Hiranandani Group’s company Yotta had applied for a Global Mobile Personal Communications by Satellite license, making it an alleged direct beneficiary of the question. [PDF of the question]

In her question, she asked the Ministry of Communication to provide information on India’s 5G readiness and the expected timeline for the nationwide rollout of the services. Furthermore, she asked for the details of the availability of the necessary fibre network and steps taken by the government to establish a nationwide fibre optics network for the rollout of 5G services, including in rural areas.

The ministry informed that the 5G services rollout was planned gradually, utilizing the existing optical fibre cable network. Telecom Service Providers and Infrastructure Providers Category-I were responsible for laying optical fibre cables and acquiring spectrum through auctions based on their business strategies. The government simultaneously implemented the BharatNet Project for high-speed broadband connectivity in rural areas.

Regarding details of the proposed energy codes

In February 2021, she asked the Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change about the proposed energy codes that directly impacted the construction business of Hiranandani Group. [PDF of the question]

In her question, she asked the ministry about the objectives of the India Cooling Action Plan, including implementing building energy codes. Details on the costs, impacts, and timeline for new standards were sought.

The ministry informed that the India Cooling Action Plan (ICAP) aimed to reduce cooling demand through better technology, refrigerant transition, and energy efficiency over 20 years. ICAP recommended integrating relevant ECBC provisions in commercial buildings and promoting ECBC-R in housing projects for thermal comfort. As of Dec 2020, 17 States/Union Territories incorporated ECBC into bylaws and were expected to save 150 bn units by 2037-38.

Regarding FPI Investment

In July 2021, she asked the Ministry of Finance about the Foreign Portfolio Investors (FPIs) holding stakes in Adani Group companies. Notably, it led to the SEBI investigation against the Adani Group. It has been alleged that the instructions for the question came directly from Hiranandani to the MP. [PDF of the question]

The Minister of Finance was asked to disclose the ultimate beneficial ownership of FPIs holding stakes in Adani Group companies. The inquiry also asked for information on the ongoing investigations, if any, of FPIs or Adani entities by regulatory authorities such as SEBI, IT, ED, DRI, or MCA for potentially suspicious transactions. The request also sought clarification on the status of three frozen funds: ALBULA INVESTMENT FUND LTD, CRESTA FUND LTD, and APMS INVESTMENT FUND LTD, with specific reference to their status in the case of Adani companies.

The Ministry informed that as of 30th June 2021, six Adani Group companies were traded on Indian stock exchanges. The holdings of FPIs in these companies were subject to daily fluctuations. SEBI was investigating certain Adani Group companies for compliance with regulations, while the DRI was investigating specific entities associated with the group. No investigations were reported under the Income Tax Act, and the ED was not conducting any investigations. SEBI issued an order in June 2016 directing depositories to freeze specific beneficiary accounts of certain FPIs, including Albula Investment Fund Ltd., Cresta Fund Ltd., and APMS Investment Fund Ltd., concerning issuances of GDRs. No such order had been issued for other beneficiary accounts of these three FPIs.

Regarding Solar Energy Corporation of India’s tenders

In July 2021, she asked the Minister of New and Renewable Energy about the tenders of the Solar Energy Corporation. It has been alleged that the question aimed to benefit Hiranandani Group’s company, Yotta, to power data centres through renewable energy in 2020. [PDF of the question]

In her question, she asked for information about the Solar Energy Corporation of India (SECI) issuing tenders for Round-the-Clock (RTC) green power, related explicitly to coal-combined renewable energy as opposed to natural gas-combined renewable energy. Furthermore, she asked for the details and reasons for this preference. Additionally, she asked about the government’s plans for a comprehensive green transition strategy with a specific focus on green power and asked to provide related details.

The Ministry informed that SECI issued a tender for Round-The-Clock power, combining renewable and non-renewable power. The government aims to achieve 175 GW of renewable power by 2022 with a year-wise trajectory for Renewable Purchase Obligation to support the green power transition.

Regarding steps taken by the government to control the prices of steel

In July 2021, Moitra asked the Ministry of Steel about the steps taken by the government to control the prices of steel in the country. Notably, Hiranandani’s real estate business was a direct beneficiary of a lower steel price. [PDF of the question]

She asked the ministry to outline the government’s actions to reduce steel prices and make it more affordable. They also asked about measures to lower the prices of raw materials, discourage exports, and encourage domestic use. Finally, they inquired about potential tariff reductions on steel imports if price increases persist.

The ministry informed that the steel sector was deregulated, allowing companies to make commercial decisions regarding production and trade. The government had taken steps to improve the availability of iron and steel, including mining reforms and increasing steel production. In the 2021-22 Union Budget, customs duties on steel products were reduced, and anti-dumping and countervailing duties on specific steel products were revoked or temporarily revoked.

Regarding city-wise gas distribution coverage

In August 2021, Moitra asked the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas about the city-wise gas distribution coverage. Notably, Hiranandani Group has a direct interest in the sector. [PDF of the question]

She asked the ministry for information regarding the demand for natural gas. Specifically, details about the City Gas Distribution-Bid-5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 of PNG home connections and CNG stations, as well as penalty system for deficiencies, and expected dates for a unified tariff nationwide and removal of price caps on gas marketing.

The ministry provided details on the GA and entity-specific details of CGD networks authorized in rounds 5-9. Non-compliance can result in penalties under regulations detailed were also provided. The ministry said that the Board can determine expansion exclusivity transparently and protect consumer interests. Furthermore, Unified tariff regulations were notified on 23rd November 2020, and the ministry said the price ceiling would remain as they were.

Regarding details of the gas pipeline by IOC, GAIL and H-Energy from West Bengal to Bangladesh

In August 2021, she asked the Ministry of External Affairs for information on IOC, GAIL and H-Energy gas pipelines from West Bengal to Bangladesh. A Hiranandani Group company, H-Energy, was an interested party in the pipeline. [PDF of the question]

She asked the ministry to provide information on the latest status of the proposed Shikarpur Integrated Check Post (ICP) in Karimpur, West Bengal. Furthermore, she questioned whether any other ICP was under development in West Bengal and if IOC, GAIL, and H-Energy were granted approvals by the PNGRB to construct a natural gas pipeline to the Bangladesh border, with the approval details in each case.

The ministry replied that seven locations in West Bengal – Phulbari, Panitanki, Jaigaon, Ghojadanga, Mahadipur, Hili, and Changrabandha – were selected as potential Integrated Check Post (ICP) sites instead of Shikarpur in Nadia District. However, land acquisition is still pending for construction by the Land Ports Authority of India. In July 2019, Hoogly Pipelines Private Limited was authorized by the Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board (PNGRB) to build a natural gas pipeline from Kanai Chhata to the Bangladesh border at Shrirampur. Additionally, PNGRB accepted the Central Government Authorization issued to GAIL for the Jagdishpur-Haldia-Bokaro-Dhamra Pipeline (JHBDPL) covering parts of West Bengal.

Regarding the allocation of airports to the Adani Group

In August 2021, Moitra asked the Ministry of Civil Aviation about allocating airports to the Adani Group. The question was not only a direct attack on the Adani Group, but the Hiranandani Group was also an interested party in the matter. [PDF of the question]

She sought information on the transfer of six airports from AAI to Adani Group under a PPP model, including Adani’s request to invoke COVID-19 force majeure, losses incurred by AAI, security clearance from the Ministry of Home Affairs, and if steps were taken to protect personal data.

The ministry replied that AAI awarded Adani Enterprises Limited a 50-year lease to manage six airports in India under a PPP model. Due to COVID-19, AEL requested extensions for the first set of airports, but AAI had no financial loss. AEL received security clearance to operate all airports with no plans for blacklisting.

Regarding KPT concerning RoRo boats and vessels getting stuck

In February 2022, Moitra asked the Minister of Ports, Shipping, and Waterways about RoRo boats and vessels getting stuck in WB and other areas of the country. Hiranandani group is an interested party as it has an agreement with Kolkata Port Trust. [PDF of the question]

In her question, she asked the ministry about RoRo barges and boats getting stuck in West Bengal and other parts of India, seeking details on the problem, corrective measures taken by Kolkata Port Trust and the Inland Waterways Authority of India, and reports of siltation in waterways.

The ministry informed that The Shyama Prasad Mookerjee Port and the Inland Waterways Authority of India (IWAI) have not reported any incidents of RoRo barges or vessels getting stuck. They maintain an adequate draft for vessels through regular maintenance dredging, computerized hydrographic surveys and river conservation works. The ministry added that this has resulted in an increase in the annual average draft while reducing the cost and quantity of dredged materials.

Regarding the development of e-sport

In February 2022, Moitra asked the Minister of Youth Affairs and Sports about developing E-Sports in India. Hiranandani Group was allegedly a direct beneficiary as its Tez Platforms is into E-Sports. [PDF of the question]

She asked the ministry about the government’s response to reports showing India as the 16th largest E-sports market in the world. She inquired about the inclusion of E-Sports in the 2022 Asian Games, the government’s stance on E-Sports plans for national regulations, support for participants in the Asian Games, and details on promoting E-Sports in India.

The ministry replied that NSFs are primarily responsible for promoting and developing any sport, and the Ministry provides financial support to recognized NSFs for international sporting events. Furthermore, the ministry said that E-Sports is a recognized competitive sport and is regulated under the National Sports Development Code of India, 2011.

Regarding the roadmap to phase out diesel vehicles to be replaced by electric, LNG

In February 2022, Moitra asked the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways to provide the roadmap to phase out diesel vehicles to be replaced by electric LNG. Notably, it allegedly favoured Darshan as he wanted to expand his LNG business. [PDF of the question]

She asked the ministry about the government’s plans to create a roadmap to shift diesel vehicles in the National Capital Region (NCR) to alternative modes like electric, LNG, biogas, hydrogen, etc. They also requested for more information about this plan.

The ministry replied that the government had issued notifications to promote alternative fuel technologies in transportation. This includes retrofitting hybrid systems to vehicles, emission norms for agricultural and construction equipment, and promoting hydrogen as fuel. Safety standards for hydrogen fuel cells have been addressed, along with a notification for an 18% hydrogen blend with CNG.

Regarding unbundling of GAIL

In March 2022, Moitra asked the Minister of Petroleum and Natural Gas about the unbundling of GAIL. Interestingly, Darshan had said on record that unbundling of GAIL was very important. [PDF of the question]

Whether the government has taken any steps to unbundle Gas Authority of India Limited (GAIL), Independent Transmission Systems Operator and Unified Tariff, she asked for the details on this matter or an explanation for not doing so. Additionally, she questioned whether the government knew that the non-unbundling of GAIL has resulted in the company not paying Central Service Taxes for inter-state sales, which could potentially lead to revenue loss for both the Central and State Governments. The woman also sought information about any actions taken to address this issue or the reasons for not taking any action if none had been initiated.

According to the government, the ministry said that the Gas Authority of India Limited (GAIL) would not be unbundled. They had requested public feedback on draft rules related to the natural gas sector, including the establishment of a Transport System Operator (TSO) in June 2021. Additionally, the PNGRB (Determination of Natural Gas Pipeline Tariff) Second Amendment Regulations, 2020, were implemented on 23rd November 2020 to enforce a Unified Tariff. The ministry added that GAIL follows a specific methodology in its natural gas trade to ensure no income loss to the Central and State Governments.

Regarding misuse of central agencies

In March 2022, Moitra asked the Ministry of Finance to provide information on the alleged misuse of central agencies. Interestingly, the question was asked around the time when the Hiranandani group had witnessed IT raids. [PDF of the question]

She asked the ministry about the Supreme Court’s warning to the ED regarding the PMLA’s usage. She also inquired about changes to the PMLA, rules for ED’s seizure enforcement, and the government’s stance on reparation for innocent individuals whose assets were seized by the ED.

The ministry replied that the Supreme Court did not make any such comments on PMLA. The ED has established guidelines for money laundering investigations. If the property was not involved in money laundering, it must be released to the rightful owner.

Regarding Adani-run Gangavaram port

In March 2023, she asked the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas about the Adani-run Gangavaram port. Interestingly, the Hiranandani Group was an affected party in the matter. [PDF of the question]

She asked the ministry about the MoU between IOCL and APSEZ at Gangavaram Port. The inquiry sought details on the contract, approval by IOCL Board and Government nominees, any related transactions, IOCL’s potential business shift, charges paid to Vizag Port, payment-related commitments, and annual payments and quantities imported by IOCL to Vizag Ports for LPG facilities over the past ten years.

In a reply, the ministry said that Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (IOCL) had signed a non-binding term sheet with Gangavaram Port Limited (GPL) and Adani Gangavaram Port Pvt. Ltd. under Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone Limited (APSEZ) outlining the terms for LPG import. The term sheet was approved by IOCL’s Chairman, not the Board. No transactions have occurred with GPL as the terminal is yet to be commissioned, and no imports have occurred. The ministry added that no definitive agreement was in place, and the final decision to shift business from Vizag port to Gangavaram Port depended on various factors.

Regarding Adani-run Dhamra Port

In March 2023, Moitra asked the Minister of Petroleum and Natural Gas about Adani-run Dhamra Port. Notably, the Hiranandani Group owns Haldia Port and wants to expand. Adani’s plans are considered a hindrance. [PDF of the question]

She asked the ministry about payment, take-or-pay clauses, planned imports, pipeline status, total capacity, and tariffs for the Dhamra LNG terminal.

The ministry replied that GAIL and IOCL signed Tolling agreements with various LNG terminal operators, including the Dhamra LNG terminal, specifying terms such as ACQ, make-up rights, and use-or-pay charges. Each secured 1.5 and 3.0 MMTPA Annual Contracted Capacity at Dhamra Terminal. The JHBDPL to Dhamra LNG Terminal pipeline was commissioned by the ministry.

We believe in Mahatma Gandhi: Opposition leaders pass joint resolution on Palestine, conveniently ignore the massacre of Israelis by Hamas

OpIndia Staff
-
0
We believe in Mahatma Gandhi: Opposition leaders pass joint resolution on Palestine, conveniently ignore the massacre of Israelis by Hamas

Amid the ongoing war between the State of Israel and Hamas, a group of Indian Opposition leaders on Monday (17th October) lashed out at Israel for retaliating against the terror attack perpetrated by Hamas.

The politicians included Congress leader Mani Shankar Iyer, RJD leader Manoj Jha, CPI leader D Raja, BSP MP Danish Ali and former Parliamentarians belonging to the Opposition.

In a press resolution, they claimed, “The international community must exert pressure on the state of Israel to abide by International laws and respect the rights and dignity of the Palestinian people. We call for intensified diplomatic efforts and multilateral initiatives to ensure a lasting peace in the region.”

“We express our deep concern regarding the ongoing crisis in Gaza and the suffering of the Palestinian people. We strongly condemn the indiscriminate bombing of Palestinians in Gaza by Israel, which we believe amounts to an attempt to genocide,” the Opposition leaders said while conveniently ignoring the killing of 1400 Israelis.

“We urge an immediate cessation of all hostilities to prevent further loss of innocent lives and the destruction of homes and infrastructure. Furthermore, we call for urgent and unimpeded delivery of humanitarian aid to the people of Gaza,” the resolution read.

While invoking Mohandas Karamachand Gandhi, the Opposition politicians claimed, “We strongly believe in the statement of Mahatma Gandhi, “Palestine belongs to the Arabs in the same sense that England belongs to the English or France to the French,” which reflects his belief in the importance of recognising the sovereignty and territorial rights of the Palestinian people, just as any other nation’s right to their homeland.”

They further added, “Recognising that the Palestinian people have endured immeasurable suffering for over 75 years, we firmly assert that now is the time to end their plight. We urge the international community to recognize the establishment of an independent Palestinian state along the 1967 borders in accordance with the UN resolutions.”

The joint resolution by 16 Opposition leaders was handed over to the Palestinian Ambassador Adnan Abu Alhaija. On 16th October (Monday), they visited the Palestine Embassy in New Delhi to express their solidarity with Palestinians.

Israel Hamas war

On 7th October, Hamas, the Palestinian terrorist organisation, killed over 1,300 Israelis, including 150+ soldiers, women, elderly, and babies on a Jewish holiday. Several foreign nationals were also killed or abducted by Hamas terrorists. Israeli forces are still discovering bodies, some of them were charred to death.

On the 9th day (15th October) of the Israel Hamas war, the Israeli president, Isaac Herzog, revealed that the Hamas terrorists were given a booklet called “The Warrior’s Guide: Jihadi Version”. The booklet described the inhumane methods the Islamist terrorists should adopt to torture the hostages.

This included terrifying hostages, giving them electric shocks, and even executing ISIS-style live-streamed executions. The manual was found on the body of a Hamas terrorist killed in Gaza during counterattacks by Israel.

1...1,6581,6591,660...7,584Page 1,659 of 7,584