Home Blog Page 2738

Sam Brinton, drag queen ‘nuclear scientist’ in the US Dept of Energy caught stealing woman’s luggage from airport, charged with felony theft

Sam Brinton, a senior official in the Department of Energy under the Biden administration who is reportedly a ‘non-binary transvestite’ has been caught stealing a woman’s luggage at an airport in Minnesota. As per reports, Brinton faces up to 10,000 USD in fines and 5 years in prison. The US Department of Energy has refused to comment on the issue.

Brinton was appointed as the Assistant Secretary of Spent Fuel and Waste Disposition in the US Department of Energy earlier this year.

As per reports, the stealing incident happened in September and Brinton was charged in October after a police investigation. Brinton had reportedly not checked in any luggage, but still went to the baggage carousel and took a woman’s expensive branded roller bag, full of her clothes and personal items, and went to a hotel.

On September 16, a woman passenger alerted authorities at the Minneapolis St Paul International Airport about her missing baggage. She had boarded a Delta flight from New Orleans and when she went to collect her baggage at the carousel, it was missing.

As per reports, the officials at the MSP airport confirmed that her baggage had arrived, but had gone missing from carousel 7. CCTV footage showed Sam Brinton removing the woman’s blue Vera Bradley designer roller bag from the carousel. Brinton was seen on camera removing the baggage tag, placing it into his handbag and leaving the airport quickly.

Brinton was tracked by the investigating authorities. He had taken a cab to a hotel, had stayed there and had left for Washington DC later. He had even gone on a trip to Europe taking the bag. On October 9, when Brinton was called by the police and asked about the bag, he replied that he may have taken the wrong bag, but the clothes inside were his.

He then called the police back 2 hours later and apologised for ‘not being completely honest’. He then claimed that he had taken the bag because he thought it was his.

The woman victim had stated in the complaint that the clothes and personal items inside the bag were worth around $2325.

Brinton had claimed that he had left the clothes at the hotel room and had left with only the bag, but no clothes were recovered from the hotel and despite providing instructions on how to return the bag to the victim, the victim had not received the bag from Brinton until October 27.

Brinton is now scheduled to appear in court on December 29 in Hennepin County. Brinton is reportedly on official leave and his lawyers have not responded to US media calls for a statement.

Brinton, an MIT grad, used to conduct a workshop called ‘Kink 101’ on college campuses and worked as an ‘anti-conversion therapy activist’. He is also a member of a drag queen society called ‘Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence’ which mocks catholic nuns with sexually explicit innuendoes. Brinton goes by the drag name of ‘Sister Ray Dee O’Active’ in drag shows, as per a report by The National Pulse.

‘No regret even if hanged, will get hoors in Jannat,’ says Shraddha’s killer Aftab during polygraph test, report says

As per a police source quoted by Dainik Jagran, Aftab Amin Poonawalla, the prime accused in Shraddha Walkar murder case has made stunning revelations during the polygraph test.

According to the police official, he has stated that even if he is hanged for the murder of Shraddha, he would not be sorry since he will be remembered as a hero when he enters paradise and will be offered ‘Hoors’ in ‘Jannat.’ Aftab also admitted to having affairs with over 20 Hindu girls during his relationship with Shraddha. Aftab’s radical worldview was reportedly on display in his police statement during the polygraph test.

The police officer said that Aftab made these revelations following the questioning. He said that he had used the Bumble app to target Hindu women and lure them into a trap. After murdering Shraddha, Aftab had also invited a psychologist to his apartment. She was also a Hindu woman. He admitted to having given her a ring which belonged to Shraddha, in a bid to lure her into relationship. He also interacted with a number of other Hindu girls.

He said he didn’t feel bad about killing Shraddha and mutilating her body. After the questioning, he used to fall asleep easily. He allegedly told police that his plan was to kill Shraddha and slice her up in Mumbai itself.

According to the police officer, Aftab confessed some stunning truths during the polygraph examination. The police seek to establish these findings following the narco test. The information provided by Aftab during the polygraph is very helpful to the investigation. After the test, five knives were found in his residence. In addition, it’s anticipated that further proof will be acquired soon.

Polygraph test of Aftab

Aftab has recently undergone a polygraph test at the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL), Rohini in New Delhi. The reports of the test are yet to be released. 

A Delhi court ordered the police to complete the narco-analysis test within five days and warned them not to use any third-degree measures. The polygraph examination will be followed by the narco test. Notably, Aftab has consented to a narco test. Notably, during the police interrogation, Aftab gave contradictory statements, prompting Delhi Police to conduct the narco test. The Delhi Police approached the court and sought permission to conduct the narco test. 

Shraddha murder case

On November 14, the Delhi Police solved the six-month-old murder case and arrested Aftab Amin Poonawala over allegations of murdering his live-in partner, and then chopping her into 35 pieces. Aftab executed the murder on May 18 and stored her body parts in the refrigerator. He then disposed of the body pieces in Delhi’s Mehrauli forest during the next 18 days. Aftab was arrested based on the complaint filed by Shraddha Walkar’s father on November 10. 

The accused has been arrested and a case under IPC section 302 (murder) and 201 (causing disappearance of evidence of an offence committed) have been registered. Further investigations into the case are underway.

Deputy Commissioner exposes lies by AAP and Arvind Kejriwal, says no stone was pelted during the Surat roadshow: Details

Deputy Commissioner of Police (Zone-3), Pinakin Parmar has denied the allegations levelled by Arvind Kejriwal that there were stones pelted during his Surat rally. This allegation was levelled by Aam Aadmi Party during his roadshow on Monday in Gujarat’s Surat.

Reportedly, during the roadshow, a scuffle broke out between BJP and AAP workers. While Arvind Kejriwal’s roadshow was crossing through Katargam locality of Surat, BJP workers chanted “Modi Modi”. Speaking to India Today/AajTak, AAP candidate Alpesh Kathiriya alleged that the stone was thrown by BJP workers. “While people are showing flowers at Kejriwal, BJP goons are throwing stones,” Kathiriya said.

“When we were moving, their (apparently referring to BJP) supporters threw a stone at us. I was thinking had they done any work in the last 27 years they would not have needed to throw stones. I would like to tell them it is Kejriwal only who will waive their electricity bills, teach your children, and offer you flowers in place of stones,” the AAP national convener said. “AAP is the party of ‘shareef’ (decent), patriots, and honest people. I am an educated person and will build schools for you. If you have to indulge in abusing others then go with them,” he said.

Taking the opportunity, Arvind Kejriwal proceeded to play victim. Kejriwal said, “They will break my eye. Have I done someone wrong? I say that I will build schools and hospitals. Show me the works done by you, do not abuse”.

The Surat police, however, said that the rally was conducted without incident and there was no stone pelting, as alleged by AAP.

Pinakin Parmar, the Deputy Commissioner of Police (Zone-3) said that Arvind Kejriwal was given Z+ security during the rally. “The rally passed off peacefully. No incident of throwing of stones took place. A minor scuffle broke out between party workers but the police controlled the situation”, he said.

Arvind Kejriwal gets support of “Muslim Fighters Club”

Ahmedabad’s Juhapura based ‘Muslim Fighters Club’ organised a meeting on Sunday, November 27, 2022, a week before the polls, where about 3,000 Muslim families pledged their allegiance to the Arvind Kejriwal-led Aam Aadmi Party. In presence of a Maulana who recited Islamic verses and amid ‘Naara-e-Takbeer, Allahu Akbar’ chants, ‘Muslim Fighters Club’ extended their support to Arvind Kejriwal.

‘Muslim Fighters Club’ also coined two slogans for AAP. “Haath ma jhaadu leelu leelu, AAP-Muslim ilu-ilu’ which loosely translates to green broom (AAP election symbol) in our hands, AAP and Muslims have ilu-ilu (ilu is often used for I-Love-You) and ‘Vote for MAGI’ where MAGI stands for Manish Sisodia (M), Arvind Kejriwal (A), Gopal Italia (G) and Isudan Gadhvi (I). 

The Muslim community that had gathered there also accused Congress of taking advantage of Muslims. Imranbhai, who runs the club, claimed that the Muslim community has always been the victim of hate and only Kejriwal is the true well-wisher of Muslims. I have spoken to our Muslim brothers in Delhi and they have said their situation has improved. Arvind Kejriwal takes care of Muslims from every part of the world. He even takes care of Muslim refugees, he said. He said that he will not specify which ‘refugees’ he means, but asked the Muslims present in the audience to make calculated guesses. 

NDTV promoter company transfers 99.5% equity to Adani, giving Gautam Adani owned company 29.19% stake in media house

New Delhi Television Ltd (NDTV)’s promoter company RRPR Holding on Monday, in a disclosure to the stock exchanges, said that it has transferred 99.5% of its equity shares to Adani group owned Vishvapradhan Commercial (VCPL). The transaction was in consonance with a conversion notice which was issued by VCPL on 23 August, 2022.

On November 11, 2022, Adani group had announced it will launch an open offer to acquire an additional 26% of NDTV’s public shares. In August, Adani Enterprises Ltd’s subsidiary AMG Media Networks Ltd purchased Vishvapradhan Commercial Pvt Ltd (VCPL), which had lent Rs 403.85 crore to NDTV promoter business RRPR Holding Pvt Ltd in 2009 and 2010. Radhika Roy and Prannoy Roy were the owners of RRPR Holding.

RRPR provided warrants to VCPL in exchange for this interest-free loan, entitling it to convert them into a 99.9% share in RRPR. RRPR owned 29.18 percent of NDTV, hence Adani Group obtained a 29.18 percent stake in NDTV in this manner. Following the acquisition of VCPL for Rs 113.75 crore, the Adani Group declared an open offer to purchase another 26% interest in NDTV.

If Adani Group has indirect control over a stake that is more than 25%, it is required by Indian law to make an open offer to buy at least 26% more from current shareholders and give them the opportunity to withdraw.

This transfer of shares will now give Adani group control of 29.18% stake in NDTV. The conglomerate is also carrying out an open offer for another 26% in the media house. The open offer began on November 22 and has seen shareholders tender 5.3 million shares, or 31.78 per cent of the issue size of 16.7 million shares as of now.

NDTV has three national news channels –NDTV 24×7, NDTV India and NDTV Profit, besides having a strong online presence. The company recorded a revenue of Rs 421 crore in the financial year 2022, with an EBITDA of Rs 123 crore and a Net Profit of Rs 85 crore during the fiscal year.

The Adani Group on August 23 announced that its media arm would purchase a 29.18 per cent stake in New Delhi Television Ltd (NDTV), and made an open offer to acquire another 26 per cent of the shares in the media giant. Vishvapradhan Commercial Private Limited (VPCL), is company incorporated in 2008. In 2009, it offered unsecured loan to NDTV’s holding company, Radhika Roy Prannoy Roy Holding Private Limited (RRPRH) worth Rs 403.85 crore. RRPRH held 29% equity in NDTV. You can read in detail about the process here.

In an interview with the Financial Times, the world’s third richest person and the Chairman of the Adani Group, Gautam Adani, stated that the takeover of NDTV is not a business opportunity but rather a ‘responsibility’. Adani also expressed his intention to make NDTV an international brand and expand it having a global footprint. “Why can’t you support one media house to become independent and have a global footprint? India does not have one single to compare to Financial Times or Al Jazeera,” he remarked in the interview.

IFFI Jury Chief and Israeli filmmaker, accused of hating his own motherland, makes speech denying Hindu genocide, calls ‘Kashmir Files’ propaganda

On November 29, an Israeli filmmaker and International Film Festival of India (IFFI) jury chairman Nadav Lapid said called filmmaker Vivek Agnihotri’s film ‘The Kashmir Files’ “vulgar” and “propaganda”. During his closing remarks at the festival, he said he was “shocked” and “disturbed” by the inclusion of the film in the competition section. The 53rd edition of IFFI was held in Goa between November 20 and November 28.

Lapid was sharing the jury report during the closing ceremony of the festival. He said, “Usually, I don’t read from paper. This time, I want to be precise. I want to thank the director and head of the programming of the festival for its cinematic richness, diversity and complexity…There were 15 films in the international competition — the front window of the festival. Fourteen out of them had cinematic qualities…and evoked vivid discussions. We were, all of us, disturbed and shocked by the 15th film, The Kashmir Files. That felt to us like a propaganda, vulgar movie, inappropriate for a competitive artistic section of such a prestigious film festival.”

He added, “I feel totally comfortable to share these feelings openly here with you on stage since the spirit that we felt in the festival can surely accept a critical discussion which is essential for art and life.”

Who is Nadav Lapid?

Nadav Lapid is an Israeli filmmaker with around 13 films to his credit as a director. He was born in Israel’s Tel Aviv. The lesser-known 47-year-old filmmaker is best known for “hate” towards his own homeland, Israel. A Palestinian sympathiser, Lapid, 2019, talked about his film Synonyms to Now Toronto magazine and called the collective soul of Israel a “sick soul”.

He said, “The film talks about the collective Israeli soul, and the Israeli collective soul is a sick soul. Something in the deepest essence of the Israeli existence is false – is rotten. It’s not just Benjamin Netanyahu – it’s not special to Israel. But, at the same time, I think this Israeli sickness or nature is characterised by young Israeli men who are muscular, smiling, who don’t raise any questions and don’t have any doubts. They are extremely proud of being Israeli. They have a totally dichotomist vision of existence: Us versus all the others.”

‘I have different views’, said Israeli diplomat

Speaking on the matter in a tweet, Israeli diplomat Kobbi Shoshani said he has different views about the film and had expressed those to Lapid following his remarks. He said, “I saw the Kashmir file and met the cast. I have a different opinion than Nadav Lapid. After his speech, I told Nadav my opinion.”

Reaction from the film fraternity

Veteran actor and one of the leads in The Kashmir Files, Anupam Kher, reacted to the Israeli filmmaker’s remarks. He said, “No matter how high the height of the lie is.. It is always small in comparison to the truth,” while sharing images from the film and films based on the Holocaust. Kher did not take any names in his tweet.

Filmmaker Ashoke Pandit wrote multiple tweets on the matter. He said, “I take strong objection to the language used by Mr Nadav Lapid for The Kashmir Files. Depicting the genocide of 3 lakh, Kashmiri Hindus cannot be called vulgar. I, as a filmmaker and a Kashmiri Pandit, condemn this shameless act of abuse towards victims of terrorism.”

He added, “Dear Anurag Thakur Ji, I, as a Kashmiri Pandit who is a victim of genocide, seek serious action against Mr Nadav Lapid, Jury head of IFFI 2022, for calling the depiction of our tragedy as vulgar. He has added salt to our wounds and hence should be made to tender an apology.”

He said, “Nadav Lapid’s selection as the jury head of IFFI53 Goa is a major lapse on behalf of the I&B ministry. Hence heads of those in the ministry, who are responsible for this crime, should roll. What does one expect from a Palestine sympathiser?!”

Ashoke added, “Israeli filmmaker Nadav Lapid has made a mockery of India’s fight against terrorism by calling The Kashmir Files a vulgar film. He has insulted 7 lac Kashmiri Pandits under the nose of the BJP govt. It’s a big blow to IFFI Goa 2022‘s credibility. Shame.”

The Kashmir Files

Directed by filmmaker Vivek Agnihotri, The Kashmir Files was released on March 11, 2022. The film was a blockbuster and widely appreciated for showing the true story of the exodus and genocide of the Kashmiri Pandits in the Vally in the 1990s. The description of the film on IFFI’s website reads, “Krishna Pandit is a young Kashmiri Pandit refugee living with his grandfather Pushkarnath Pandit – who has been a witness to the 1990 genocide of Kashmiri Pandits. He had to flee from Kashmir and has been fighting for the revocation of Article 370 all his life. Krishna believes his parents died in an accident in Kashmir. As a student of JNU, under the influence of his mentor, Professor Radhika Menon, he refutes the genocide and fights for Azad Kashmir, discovering the truth only after his grandfather’s death.“

‘I am ashamed’, Israeli Ambassador to India apologises after Jewish filmmaker calls The Kashmir Files ‘vulgar propaganda’, read his open letter

Israeli Ambassador to India, Sri Lanka and Bhutan, Naor Gilon on Tuesday called out the Left-wing Jewish filmmaker Nadav Lapid, who referred to the film based on Kashmiri Hindu genocide perpetrated by Pakistan-backed Islamist terrorists in the late 1980s, early 1990s, as ‘vulgar propaganda’.

In an open letter Ambassador Gilon shared on Twitter, he said that Lapid should be ashamed of himself.

The whole text of his open letter to Lapid is as follows:

“In Indian culture they say that a guest is like God. You have abused in the worst way the Indian invitation to chair the panel of judges at @IFFIGoa as well as the trust, respect and warm hospitality they have bestowed on you. Our Indian friends brought @lioraz and @issacharoff from @FaudaOfficial in order to celebrate the love in #India towards #Fauda and #Israel. I suspect that this is maybe also one of the reasons they invited you as an Israeli and me as the ambassador of Israel.

I understand your need in retrospect to “justify” your behavior but I can’t understand why you told @ynetnews afterwards that the minister and I said on stage that there is similarity between our countries because “we fight a similar enemy and reside in a bad neighborhood”. We did speak about the similarities and closeness between our countries. The minister spoke about his visits to Israel, it being a Hi-Tech nation and the potential of combining this with the film industry. I spoke about the fact that we grew up watching Indian films.

I also said that we should be humble when India, with such a great film culture, is consuming Israeli content (Fauda and more).

I’m no film expert but I do know that it’s insensitive and presumptuous to speak about historic events before deeply studying them and which are an open wound in India because many of the involved are still around and still paying a price.

As a son of a holocaust survivor, I was extremely hurt to see reactions in India to you that are doubting Schindler’s List, the Holocaust and worse. I unequivocally condemn such statements. There is no justification. It does show the sensitivity of the Kashmir issue here. From your interview to Ynet the connection you make between your criticism of #KashmirFiles and your dislike to what is happening in Israeli politics was quite evident.

My suggestion. As you vocally did in the past, feel free to use the liberty to sound your criticism of what you dislike in Israel but no need to reflect your frustration on other countries. I’m not sure that you have enough factual basis to make such comparisons. I know I don’t.

You will go back to Israel thinking that you are bold and “made a statement”. We, the representatives of Israel, would stay here. You should see our DM boxes following your “bravery” and what implications it may have on the team under my responsibility. The friendship between the people and the states of India and Israel is very strong and will survive the damage you have inflicted. As a human being, I feel ashamed and want to apologize to our hosts for the bad manner in which we repaid them for their generosity and friendship.“

The International Film Festival of India (IFFI) Jury Head Nadav Lapid on Monday, during the closing ceremony, called Vivek Agnihotri’s The Kashmir Files ‘propaganda’ and ‘vulgar’. The film was released earlier this year and was based on the Kashmiri Hindu genocide perpetrated in the valley in the late 1980s, 1990s where Islamist terrorists backed by Pakistan unleashed terror upon Kashmiri Hindus leaving lakhs homeless and dead.

The film depicts incidents inspired by real-life where Kashmiri Hindus were targeted because of their religious identity and were brutally raped, murdered and driven out of their homes. You can read about the real-life incidents of brutality perpetrated on Hindus here.

Journalist Shiv Aroor faces online attack by leftist trolls for featuring bikini pictures of Richa Chadha in India Today show over her Galwan jibe

Journalist Shiv Aroor has been at the receiving end of a relentless online attack over an India Today report on actor Richa Chadha’s Galwan jibe against the Indian Army. 

The anchor recently took to Twitter to share screenshots of Twitter DMs he has been receiving ever since he anchored a show on the India Today channel that featured publicly available bikini pictures of Richa Chadha for her unseemly comment against the Indian Army soldiers.

“About 400 of these in my DM since morning, at the same time,” tweeted Aroor in his characteristically unruffled manner with the screenshot of an abusive message sent to him by a seemingly Congress supporter.

In another tweet, he shared a screenshot of a Twitter user named Nitin Meena with a picture of Rahul Gandhi as his profile picture. Nitin had sent misogynistic abuses and obscene messages to the India Today journalist.

Earlier yesterday, Aroor took to Twitter to tweet “Toolkitiyas” in an apparent reference to the outrage that swept the microblogging website following India Today’s coverage of the Richa Chadha controversy.

The online attack against Shiv Aroor erupted after those belonging to the left-liberal intelligentsia, including Alt News co-founder Mohammed Zubair, who had earlier this year attracted the wrath of Islamists after sharing a cropped video of Nupur Sharma, took to Twitter to target the journalist and India Today for featuring freely available bikini pictures of Richa Chadha in their reportage.

Soon thereafter, many left-leaning liberals who were desperately searching for an opportunity to portray Chadha as a victim pounced on the chance to attack India Today and Shiv Aroor for using the actor’s bikini pictures in their show. 

For the self-described liberals, who sanctimoniously sermonise on how individuals are free to wear what they want and how one’s attire is not an indicator of their character, the usage of Richa Chadha’s bikini images was beyond the pale as it sought to “objectify” the actor, even though none of them outraged when Chadha or any other actor for that matter, as a professional, shoot such pictures for public consumption.

How outrage against Shiv Aroor by liberals is an attempt to gaslight users and deflect attention from Richa Chadha’s Galwan jibe

The pictures for which liberals felt scandalised were shot years ago and were done with the explicit approval of actor Richa Chadha. In fact, they had remained in the public domain for years and yet, none of the professional outragers outraging now objected when media organisations or social media users used them. Through the outrage over bikini pictures, the ‘liberals’ projected their own conservative and narrow mindset, revealing their inherently patriarchal and patronising demeanour toward women.

However, as the India Today channel drew on the public repository of Chadha’s images and included some of her pictures in skimpy dresses in their reportage, the ‘liberals’ saw an opportunity to gaslight their followers and push the limelight away from the actor. Of all the things that were discussed about Richa Chadha’s tweet on Galwan, Mohammed Zubair and his ilk fretting over her swimming pool pictures betrayed their callous indifference towards the Galwan Bravehearts, who lost their lives fighting against the Chinese PLA Army but not before taking down about 40 enemy soldiers. Instead, they attacked Shiv Aroor and the India Today channel and diverted attention from Chadha’s disparaging remarks against the Galwan Bravehearts.

Even so, this was not the first attempt that the liberal ecosystem had rallied in support of the actor and sought to sweep her Galwan jibe under the carpet. While they displayed eager alacrity in criticising those who called out Chadha’s remarks, they had remained uncharacteristically muted when the controversy erupted. Hours later, as social media seethed in anger over the actor’s comments, the liberal coterie tried to dress them up as remarks against the Modi government, even though she made the jibe while quoting a serving Indian Army official.

Earlier last week, when Akshay Kumar stood up in support of the Indian Army, the entire liberal ecosystem, which was till then in a defensive mode, went into overdrive to project Chadha as a victim and attack Kumar with ‘Canadian’ jibes, although they had enthusiastically embraced unsolicited and uninformed comments made by foreigners, including popstar Rihanna, former porn star Mia Khalifa, Canada PM Justin Trudeau, and others over the farmers’ protests.

Richa Chadha mocks Galwan Bravehearts

Bollywood actress Richa Chadha took to Twitter on Wednesday, 23rd November 2022, to mock the Indian Army. In response to a statement from the Commanding-in-Chief, Northern Command of the Indian Army that they are prepared to take back Pakistan-occupied Kashmir if the government issues such an order, Richa Chadha mocked the Indian Army with a Galwan taunt.

After Chadha was called out by netizens for the ‘Galwan’ jibe at the Indian Army, she issued a half-hearted apology on Twitter today. Richa Chadha took to Twitter to tender her ‘apology’, she tagged her lawyer Saveena Bedi Sachar and attached an apology message. “If the 3 words which are being dragged into controversy have offended or hurt anyone, I apologise and also say that it would sadden me if even unintentionally my words have triggered this feeling in my brothers in the Fauj of which my own Nanaji has been an illustrious part.”

Before tweeting the ‘apology’, Chadha did not leave the opportunity to play the victim as well. She, in a tweet, posted this morning claimed to have received a ‘call’. “Just received a ‘call’, had muted replies so had no idea… bye all,” Richa Chadha tweeted with the reply feature disabled.

Taiwan welcomes Canada’s Indo-Pacific strategy that expresses concerns over China’s rise as a disruptive global power: Details

0

On Monday (November 28), Taiwan applauded the launch of the ‘Indo-Pacific strategy’ of Canada, which identified the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as an “increasingly disruptive global power” in the region.

In a tweet, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Taiwan said, “We welcome the launch of Canada’s Indo-Pacific Strategy, which expresses great concern over China’s disruptive rise & stresses the importance of Taiwan-Canada partnership.”

“Together, we’ll continue working to promote peace, security & prosperity in the region,” it further added. On Sunday (November 27), the Foreign Minister of Canada, Mélanie Joly, presented a road map to deepen the country’s engagement in the Indo-Pacific region over the next 10 years.

The ‘Indo-Pacific Strategy’ of Canada, as outlined here, criticised China for trying to exploit the rules-based international order after having immensely benefitted from it.

“China has benefitted from the rules-based international order to grow and prosper, but it is now actively seeking to reinterpret these rules to gain a greater advantage,” the document read.

It further added, “China’s assertive pursuit of its economic and security interests, advancement of unilateral claims, foreign interference and increasingly coercive treatment of other countries and economies have significant implications in the region, in Canada and around the world.”

Canada lambasts China over territorial expansionism, human rights violations

The decade-long roadmap pointed out that respect for sovereignty is a crucial component in a rule-based international order. “China is an increasingly disruptive global power,” it underlined.

“China is making large-scale investments to establish its economic influence, diplomatic impact, offensive military capabilities, and advanced technologies. China is looking to shape the international order into a more permissive environment for interests and values that increasingly depart from ours,” the document continued.

The ‘Indo-Pacific Strategy’ of Canada [pdf] pointed out how China has been flouting the United Nations directives on disputes in the South China Sea, militarising the region, and committing human rights violations on Uyghurs, Tibetans, and other religious and ethnic minorities.

“Canada has been compelled to adjust warnings to Canadians travelling to China, as well as to the business community, to account for the growing risk of arbitrary application of Chinese laws,” the document read.

It clarified, “In areas of profound disagreement, we will challenge China, including when it engages in coercive behaviour—economic or otherwise—ignores human rights obligations or undermines our national security interests and those of partners in the region.”

Canada also vowed to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong and those victimised by the arbitrary application of China’s National Security Law.

“While remaining consistent with our One China Policy, Canada will continue our multifaceted engagement with Taiwan, which includes collaborating on trade, technology, health, democratic governance and countering disinformation,” the Indo-Pacific Strategy outlined.

“Canada will oppose unilateral actions that threaten the status quo in the Taiwan Strait,” it further assured.

Ongoing tensions between China and Canada

The Canadian government and the Communist Party of China (CPC) are at loggerheads over the latter’s alleged interference in the political affairs and electoral practices in Canada.

The growing tension between the two countries became apparent during an ‘unpleasant’ encounter between Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Chinese Premier Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the recently concluded G-20 summit.

“If you are sincere, we should communicate with each other in a respectful manner. Otherwise, it will be hard to say what the result will be,” Xi reprimanded Trudeau for allegedly leaking information to the media about their meeting that took place on November 15 this year.

Much to the displeasure of the Chinese Premier, Trudeau defended himself and said, “In Canada, we believe in free and open and frank dialogue and that is what we will continue to have…”

Diplomatic relations between China and Canada have been going through a rough patch since 2018. Opindia had reported in detail how China had provided covert funding to 11 Canadian federal candidates in the 2019 elections and facilitated the defeat of the Conservative Party in the 2021 polls.

China has also been using traditional tactics such as espionage to advance its interests and setting up illegal police stations in Canada to suppress anti-China sentiments across the world, spread communist ideology, and interfere in the governance and democratic process.

MIT Manipal initiates inquiry, suspends lecturer after controversy erupts over his alleged comment against a student

On Monday, November 28, the Manipal Institute of Technology in Karnataka’s Udupi district issued a statement in response to the controversy sparked by a video that went viral on social media. In the video, a lecturer from Manipal was being accused of making an inappropriate remark toward a Muslim student in his class. According to the statement issued by the university, an investigation has been launched, and the professor has been barred from teaching until the investigation is complete.

The controversy erupted after many social media users took to Twitter to share a video wherein an infuriated student is heard arguing with his professor, accusing him of belittling him because of his religious identity.

Though it is unclear what the professor allegedly said to spark the outrage, the irate student is repeatedly heard accusing his lecturer of labelling him a terrorist.

“26/11 is not funny… being Muslim and facing such things in this country is not funny. How can you label me as a terrorist in front of everyone in the class?” the angry student can be heard asking the professor, who in response is heard telling the student that he is like his son. However, not in the mood to relinquish, the agitated student added, “Will you call your son a terrorist? How can you call me that? That too in front of so many people.”

The video went viral after Washington Post columnist and donation fraud accused Rana Ayyub took to her Instagram handle to share the video with the comment, “A muslim student registers his protest after a professor refers to muslims as terrorists. I feel terribly terribly sorry for the young minds in India who are witnessing this prejudice and hate even in spaces that are meant to be safe and shield them from this bigotry that is all pervasive. Huge respect for this young boy but this is not the time for us to laud his courage. Why are our children being compelled to protest in spaces meant to be their safe havens, in spaces meant to be impartial. I cannot imagine the toll it must take on his emotional health. #islamophobia.”

The statement issued by MIT, Karnataka, read, “The institute has already initiated an inquiry into the incident and the concerned staff has been debarred from classes till the inquiry is over. We would like everyone to know that the institute does not condone this kind of behaviour and this isolated incident will be dealt with in accordance with the laid down policy.”

“The institute prides itself with one of the biggest diversity on campus and is committed to uphold our constitutional values of treating everyone alike, irrespective of their caste, religion, region, gender etc,” it added.

MIT statement

However, not everyone on social media agreed with Manipal’s reaction to social media controversy, with some users calling it a ‘joke’.

The institute in the southern state’s coastal region meanwhile has denounced the occurrence and ordered an investigation. According to an MIT official, “The lecturer has been barred from taking any further classes. An enquiry team has been formed to probe the incident.”

For us to progress, our National character has to be changed: Here is why it may take 7 generations

0

What is the biggest hurdle for a nation to progress? I feel it is the national attitude. Let me compare this with an industrial unit or even a disciplined army unit.

The most difficult to change even in such cohesive organizations is ‘people’s attitude’.

Let me illustrate this with an example of a college- a postgraduate college where two batches coexist, the juniors and the seniors. If the culture of the college is rotten then it is an uphill task for the new incumbent principal to change it. It seems simple but it has an inherent problem which I call the ‘trickle effect’.

The batches learn good and bad traits from each other on campus. You set things right and you will see some good results but not perfect results. This is a ‘collective bad culture’ you are trying to set right. When a senior batch goes out or passes out it leaves some bad traits with the juniors who now are seniors. They pass it to the incoming juniors. The reason is that when a new junior batch arrives you cannot insulate the two current batches. So it is passed on in small packets down the years- generation after generation. It becomes a residual debris which takes several years to change into a perfectly good culture.

Same problem is faced by a commanding officer of an army unit, but in a different form. It goes the same way for a new MD/CEO of a large corporation.

The biggest challenge for us is to change the attitude of 1.4 billion people – our understanding of things, our attitude and our perception in general- all put together it is the national attitude, national character. The ‘saab chalta hai attitude’ and acceptance of things as they have been running for the last six to seven decades are referred to by many in disgust as a DNA problem. They also say this because they know DNA cannot be changed- this is largely correct. People feel we are like this only and no one can set things right. People in disgust say the system is rotten to an extent that nothing can be done to set things right. People blame red tape, bureaucrats, politicians, government, Industry honchos, and businessmen and it seems it has gone into our blood- fair enough. Every year in winter, Delhi faces severe pollution problems and words like a gas chamber, living hell come out of the closets and the same debate starts all over again- but nothing is done and they also promise that next year at the same time they would be discussing (the same panel on TV) the same issue.

DNA, or deoxyribonucleic acid, is the hereditary material in humans and almost all other organisms. Nearly every cell in a person’s body has the same DNA. This is a building block of life if put in simple words.

What is a gene? A word which we so casually use almost routinely? A gene is the basic physical and functional unit of heredity. Genes are made up of DNA.

Every person has two copies of each gene, one inherited from each parent. Most genes are the same in all people, yet a very small number of genes a person has (less than 1 percent of the total) are slightly different between different people. These small differences contribute to each person’s unique physical features. This also impacts a person’s temperament. 

Scientists estimate that around 20 to 60 per cent of temperament is decided by genetics. Several studies indicate some genes that play a role in temperament. These genes are involved in communication between cells in the brain. Some variations of genes could contribute to particular traits related to temperament. For example, KATNAL2 gene variants are associated with self-discipline and carefulness. 

Gregor Mendel gained popularity and was honoured as the founder of the modern science of genetics. Though farmers had known for centuries that crossbreeding of animals and plants could favour certain desirable traits, Mendel’s pea plant experiments conducted between 1856 and 1863 established many of the rules of heredity more scientifically, now referred to as the laws of Mendelian inheritance.

Each generation we go back is expected to halve the amount of autosomal genetic material an ancestor gives to you. As this material is inherited in chunks, we only have to go back nine generations until it is quite likely that a specific ancestor contributed zero of your ‘autosomal’ material to you. Autosomal dominant inheritance is a way a genetic trait or condition can be passed down from parent to child. One copy of a mutated, altered (changed) gene from one parent can cause the genetic condition. A child who has a parent with the mutated gene has a 50% chance of inheriting that mutated gene. This process is random, as the process of recombination – the breaking of chromosomes into certain blocks – and transmission are both random events. 

A corollary to this is that one could inherit traits from ancestors as back as nine generations! From your great great-grandfather’s great grandfather’s great grandfather till nine ladders back!

That is why sometimes parents cannot figure out or determine how their child has acquired some trait which none of them has! If his grandfather was a miser, and his parents are not, he could end up being a miser- ‘dada par gaya hai’ is the conclusion. This is how complex is human nature. And at the level of a race or nation, it could become impossible to decipher the havoc.

Emotional Intelligence is a case in point

Anger is a very strong emotion. It was given to mankind by nature, millions of years ago when man had to save himself from predators. Fight or flight was the reaction because of a combination of anger and fear. Anger impacts the adrenalin flow/production which gives you that energy to fight or run.

Today predators don’t walk the cities but we still have a lot of ‘residual anger’ in us! That is why road rage, losing one’s cool, hitting out at someone on little provocation are still with us- the trickle effect.

DNA of 1.4 billion will take time to heal or repair 

If we start now it would take a consistent effort of seven generations or maybe nine to completely clean up the slate. But it is possible and that is the good news. So patience is required- we have started with clean India, stand up India and now it has to be ‘wake up India’ and ‘shake up India’.

I feel today more important than Skills, Science, Arts and Commerce is to work on the national attitude and build a solid national character. We should have set the course right immediately after independence, which we didn’t and we have lost a lot of time. Another corollary to this hypothesis is that it takes less time to write on a clean slate but a dirty slate needs to be first cleaned and then rewritten. We built great institutions, technical colleges, universities, science, medicine and other things but missed character-building. What we see every day on TV debates, the rot, frustration and helplessness is the result of this one big mistake. We are so busy learning new skills to build a nation, and become a great economy with high GDP growth but which way are we heading if this is the state of affairs?

Gross Domestic Character-GDC

We need to work on CQ- character quotient as a high national priority. Start top down and bottom up simultaneously. The executive and judiciary have to crack the whip hard from the top. ‘You sacrifice a few for billion happy tomorrows’. Will not be a bad deal.

Values and nation first kind of an attitude needs to build from KG upwards. You need to give it a top priority as a red hot priority in the school curriculum- you can alter habits if you alter them at the very beginning of a child’s life. If you want to become a superpower and a respected nation, a nation at peace with itself, then this has to be done first- we have no choice. We can change our DNA one step at a time. Wish we had a ‘National Gene editor’.

As Mark Twain said ‘A habit cannot be tossed out of the window. It must be coaxed down the stairs a step at a time’.