Home Blog Page 5654

Meet Anand Singh: The new Forest Minister of Karnataka, an accused in illegal mining cases

A controversy has erupted in Karnataka over Chief Minister BS Yediyurappa’s decision to appoint newly-elected MLA Anand Singh as the minister for forest, environment and ecology. The opposition parties in the state have hit out at the BJP government for appointing Anand Singh, a mining baron, as the forest minister.

Who is Anand Singh?

Anand Singh, a four-time MLA from Vijayanagara, is a businessman with mining interests and a former close-associate of infamous mining barons Bellari Reddy brothers. Singh, who has assets worth over Rs 100 crore, entered into politics in 2008 along with the Reddy brothers.

He first served as tourism minister in the first Yediyurappa government in 2008. However, he later quit the BJP to join the Congress ahead of the 2018 elections claiming he was fed up with internal bickering within the party.

Interestingly, Anand Singh was one of the few Congress MLAs who had gone missing in 2018 ahead of BS Yediyurappa’s trust vote. However, Singh made a dramatic entry to Vidhana Soudha later in the day, being escorted by senior Congress leader DK Shivakumar.

Later in 2019, Anand Singh is one among the newly-elected BJP legislators who had defected from Congress. He was one of the 17 MLAs who quit the Congress-JDS coalition and joined BJP, which led to the collapse of HD Kumaraswamy-led Karnataka government.

Singh, along with 16 other MLAs, was disqualified by the former assembly speaker. Though the Supreme Court had upheld the disqualification, it had allowed the MLAs to contest elections again.

Later, Singh contested and won the recently held by-polls on a BJP ticket. He was inducted into the Cabinet by Yediyurappa last week. He was initially given the Food, Civil Supplies and Consumers Affairs portfolio. However, the Vijayanagara MLA’s was later appointed as Minister for Forest, Ecology and Environment.

Read: Karnataka: Supreme Court upholds disqualification of 17 ‘rebel’ MLAs, allows them to contest elections

The Cases:

According to Singh’s election affidavit, the MLA has listed 15 pending cases against him. He was reportedly arrested twice in 2013 and 2015 on charges of illegal transportation of iron ore.

Reportedly, these offences fall under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, along with violations of the Karnataka Forest Act. They include charges of criminal conspiracy, criminal breach of trust, cheating, dishonesty, illegal transport or movement of forest produce and forgery of documents.

Singh, a former associate of the mining barons – Reddy brothers, was arrested in 2015 by the Special Investigation Team (SIT) of the Karnataka Lokayukta on charges of illegal iron ore transportation.

In one of the cases, filed by the Range Forest Officer, Hosapete, Singh was accused of ‘counterfeiting or defacing’ marks on trees or timber and altering boundary marks within the forest.

Anand Singh was also arrested in 2013 as well in connection with alleged illegal export of iron ore from Belekeri port. In September 2019, Singh was acquitted in one case pertaining to the alleged export of 1.3 lakh tonnes of iron ore from Belekeri.

‘Conflict of interest’ allegations

Several state leaders, opposition parties, social media users and former Lokayukta Santhosh Hegde have voiced concerns over the portfolio allocation. Since many cases against Singh are being pursued by the forest department, many have also alleged that his appointment sends a wrong message to the officials.

Following the controversy, Karnataka chief minister BS Yediyurappa on Wednesday met senior ministers and discussed the possibility of changing the Vijayanagara MLAs’s portfolio.

Meanwhile, Anand Singh has maintained that the portfolio was allocated to him by the chief minister and that he did not ask for it.

Claiming that the cases against him were ‘minor violations’, he claimed the cases are related to traffic violations.”Traffic violation cases if you have vehicles, similarly- there are naturally cases of violation as the family has been in the mining business for long.”

Ignore fear-mongers: Here is how private players lining up to run railway trains is real reform

Twenty years ago, air travel was a distant dream for most Indians. We had Indian Airlines and Air India, both creaky government monopolies, run (rarely on time) from equally creaky government-run airports. Prices were high, service was poor. Like almost everything else in India from the Nehruvian era, it sucked.

Then something happened. The skies were opened up. Private airlines came into the picture. Bit by bit, the government fought back the resistance from the employee unions and privatized the airports. That’s when a whole new world opened up.

The aspiration associated with flying at the time is perfectly captured in this touching ad from Air Deccan in the 2000s.

Today, India has the third-highest number of airline passengers in the world, just after the United States and China. Our big airports rank among the best, most comfortable in the world. But these big airports, most of them refurbished just a decade ago, are bursting at the seams already with traffic. From 2014 to 2018, passenger traffic grew at double digits every year.

Read: Congress lies about Budget 2020, claims Modi Govt has reduced funds for Indian Railways: Here are the facts

Smaller airports are buzzing too. A little over ten years ago, Ranchi airport had two flights a day, one from Delhi and one from Kolkata (both Air India). Today, there is a long line to enter the airport at almost every hour of the day. The newly built terminal already feels a little cramped. After all, air traffic at Ranchi grew 27% last year. The year before, it grew by a staggering 72%!

Not everyone in India can fly yet, but the middle class surely can. And did you know that on a per-kilometre basis, flying in India is the cheapest in the whole world?

Untitled
WSJ blog on Indian Domestic Flights being cheapest in the world

The private sector gave us better mobility, better service, better standard of living and more employment opportunities. And lowered the prices! Well, of course, it did.

How did Indian aviation become such a success story? Because we took the government out and brought the free market in.

What else is wrong with India? Why not apply the same cure to it? Well, we have the Railways.

The prices aren’t high. But the service is generally bad. And there is little to no accountability. Because of the politics, passenger fares did not rise for decades on end. At one point, the Railways had become a rather dangerous mode of travel. We have seen some improvements since then, but we are clearly nowhere compared to what we expect from developed nations.

There is only so much the government can do. And finally, the Railway is getting ready to welcome private players. Tata, Adani and Hyundai queue up to run private trains and this is how Indian Railways is set to reform.

Untitled
Source: Livemint

The new chapter began with Delhi Lucknow Tejas Express last year, leased from Indian Railways and operated by IRCTC which is now a publicly-traded company. By the end of this month, there will be three such trains. By 2024, we will likely have hundreds of such trains, running on 100 routes identified by the government.

This is real reform that India has been expecting from Modi sarkar and it will change the face of the nation. If we know anything about govt bureaucracies, we can guess that the sheer resistance that this move must have faced would be mind-boggling.

But it seems that things are finally smooth and on track. And private players are lining up for the big opportunity. Tata, Adani and Hyundai are just the beginning. As the Mint article notes, Siemens, Alstom and Bombardier are all interested.

Who would not be interested? Railways cater to hundreds of millions of people in the world’s fastest-growing major economy (yeah…we got that distinction back). The possibilities are simply endless.

All it took was to stop treating Indian Railways as a liability and start seeing them as an asset. The reach of the Railway is phenomenal across the length and breadth of India. Who would not want a piece?

It is expected that private players will be given control over the prices. In the short term, this means we can expect the prices to be generally higher than regular ticket fares. So where does that leave the poor?

No problem. The old Railway is not going anywhere. Instead, it is giving an option to folks who can afford to spend more. And when that happens, the economy grows, more wealth is created and everyone does better. Which would include the very poor who may not be able to afford the new private trains?

Here is what was wrong with the old system (and everything socialist in general). To make sure that the poor could afford something, we kept everyone locked in at the same level, not allowed to move. While that may sound like sharing and caring in a child’s bedtime story, it is a very bad idea in practice.

Because when everybody is trapped at the same level, nobody can go out there, take a step ahead and create wealth. Things never improve for anyone. Is that better?

Private investment will bring more capital to our railways. More job opportunities. It will stimulate our economy. Who wins in this? Everyone, including the poorest person in India.

Roads don’t just help those who can afford to buy cars. They help the ones who work on building the road, the ones who work on building the cars, the ones who start businesses along the highways or find jobs in them.

When the sleepy old railway station turns into a thriving hub of economic activity, everyone wins.

There is no doubt that old socialists will try to create all sorts of fears in people about the privatization thrust within Indian railways. You will see them on TV screens and internet columns shortly, breathing rhetoric, crying about the poor.

Don’t forget that it is this rhetoric that kept India stuck at one place for 40 straight years. It is this rhetoric because of which we are behind the Chinese today. What this rhetoric has done to our country is very very cruel indeed.

So ignore them. And remember that these intellectual talking heads are making a lot more money today precisely because the media is a vibrant free market. The old Doordarshan monopoly is gone. Dismantling the government monopoly helped these talking heads grow their personal bank accounts. Don’t let them talk us out of the process which can do the same for others.

One year of Pulwama attack: Here is how the Media played vulture while our martyrs’ funeral pyres burnt

The 14th of February marks the one year anniversary of the Pulwama Terror Attack. The heinous terror attack claimed the lives of more than forty CRPF Jawans and caused grievous injury to the collective conscience of the country. However, in the moment of the heinous act of terrorism by Pakistan sponsored terrorists, there were some people who were using it to further their own political agenda. The conduct of the mainstream media in the aftermath of the Pulwama Attack was indeed deplorable and disgusting, to put it mild terms. Even as the funeral pyres of our martyrs had not turned cold, the media betrayed them.

In what was perhaps the worst article of the previous decade, The Caravan published a caste-wise analysis of the deceased martyrs. In its efforts to accurately capture the data, the journalist even called the families of the martyrs to inquire about their caste in their moment of unimaginable grief. The journalist himself, Ajaz Ashraf, belonged to the same religion as the Pulwama terrorist. However, a dedicated effort was made to deflect attention from the religion of the perpetrator and pin the blame, instead, on the Upper Castes.

It wasn’t the only evidence of the moral depravity of the mainstream media that was on display in the aftermath of the Pulwama Terror Attack. Soon after the identity of the terrorist became known, the mainstream media engaged in a full-scale effort to whitewash the sins of his family. It even provided a platform for the family of the terrorist to blame the Indian Armed Forces for the path his son had chosen to tread.

Read: CRPF to pay homage to Pulwama martyrs on first anniversary of the attack

The mainstream media relied on the family of the terrorist to claim that he had chosen to become a terrorist because he was supposedly harassed by the Indian Army. Nowhere else in the world does it happen that the media rushes to air the views of the terrorist’s family that casts aspersions on the conduct of the Indian Army days after a terror attack that claimed the lives of so many.

Furthermore, the mainstream media worked hard to absolve the sins of the family entirely and humanize them. A report published by the Hindustan Times claimed that the ‘family of the Jaish operative can’t believe he joined militant ranks’. Apart from the obvious omission of Muhammad from the name of the Jaish-e-Muhammad, the media house tried to paint the family as completely innocent when it is extremely likely that the seeds of radicalization were sowed in the terrorist’s own house. And yet, we are asked to participate in a suspension of disbelief and completely embrace the terrorist’s family’s proclamations of innocence.

The other extreme instance of disgusting conduct by people in the media was the deputy news editor of NDTV glorifying the terrorist attack. She was eventually suspended for a couple of weeks by the propagandist news network. She had said in a Facebook post “where a grisly 44 has been proven to be greater than the mythical 56”. With this, she had added a hashtag #HowstheJaish, a take on the famous dialogue ‘How’s the Josh’ from the movie Uri: The Surgical Strike.

Read: From Pulwama terrorist Ahmed Dar to Maoists who killed BJP MLA: Here is how they speak the same language as ‘Liberals’ demonising Hindus and RSS

Pakistan was even relying on Indian media and ‘intellectuals’ held in high esteem in liberal circles to peddle the narrative that the Pulwama Terror Attack was a false-flag operation. Ashok Swain’s tweet from December 11 where he had insinuated that the NDA government could trigger a conflict with Pakistan to reap electoral benefits was used by none other than the former DG-ISPR of Pakistan Asif Ghafoor to claim that the Pulwama terror attack was orchestrated by the Indian government.

Ghafoor had also made comments along the lines of The Caravan caste-analysis report in his efforts to slander India. Not only that, but Ghafoor had also mentioned the video of the terrorist’s parents, which was widely reported by the Indian media, where it was insinuated that Adil Dar turned terrorist because of maltreatment by the Army. He had said, “He was under arrest in 2017, security forces maltreated him, there is a video message by his parents as well. Please see that to realize how he was forced into a situation where he resorted to such a violent response.”

The conduct of the mainstream media while covering the Pulwama Terror Attack and its aftermath has been atrocious. And yet, the worst offenders have received great praise from the ’eminent journalist’ in the community. Ravish Kumar, for instance, spoke of The Caravan in glowing terms days a day before the Balakot Airstrikes. At the same time, he claimed that there was an effort underway to sow religious discord within the ranks of the Indian Army.

One would have expected the media to engage in a period of deep reflection and serious introspection following their pathetic coverage of the terrorist attack. However, nothing much appears to have changed since then. The more things change, the more they remain the same. And it appears extremely unlikely that the conduct of the mainstream media will get any better any time soon.

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella to visit India on February 24

Alongside US President Donald Trump, another important figure is set to visit India in the month of February. Microsoft’s Chief Executive Officer Satya Nadella is planning to visit India between the 24th of February and the 26th, as per reports.

Sources close to Nadella said that he will likely visit New Delhi, Bengaluru and Mumbai. He will also meet some industry leaders, although there is yet to be an official announcement from the company.

Microsoft reportedly is trying to get a meeting fixed between the Prime Minister and the chief of Microsoft. However, both the PMO and the company has not made any official statement for now.

Responding to an e-mail query by the Economic Times, Microsoft confirmed the visit. “Yes, Satya Nadella, CEO, Microsoft, will be visiting India later this month to address customers, young achievers, students, developers and entrepreneurs,” the company replied. According to sources, he will meet industry leaders and government functionaries during his visit.

Nadella scheduled visit comes just weeks after the Indian origin tech leader had made controversial statement regarding the Citizenship Amendment Act. His comments last month on the CAA drew sharp criticism from the Indian government. He was quoted by Buzzfeed as saying that the new law implemented by Modi’s government was “just bad”.

Later, Microsoft had released a statement where he said that every country has the right to protect and define their borders. Many felt that this was a face-saver tactic by the company.

It is viewed by many that such a visit is the company’s attempt to try and brush the recent comments over the CAA under the carpet and the timing suits them well. President Trump will visit India between 24th or 25th of February. Recently, India finalised defence deals worth 3.5 billion with USA.

‘There must be huge mass movement if Muslims are sent to detention camps due to CAA’: P Chidambaram instigates students in JNU

Congress senior leader P Chidambaram on Thursday while addressing students at the JNU campus on the Citizenship Amendment Act, attempted to instigate them by saying that there should be a “huge mass movement” if any Muslim is sent to detention camps in case the Supreme Court upholds the validity of the Citizenship Amendment Act.


Replying to a question by a student asking for the best course of action if the CAA is upheld by the Supreme court, Chidambaram suggested: “When they touch the excluded…they will only be Muslims, try to identify and throw them out, declare them Stateless. There must be a huge mass movement resisting any Muslim being thrown out or kept in detention camps.”

Speaking at the JNU campus in Delhi, Chidambaram said that CAA was an outcome of the “NRC fiasco” in Assam which left 19 lakh people out of NRC. The CAA was brought to accommodate 12 lakh Hindus out of the 19 lakh people who could not be included in the final NRC in Assam, the former home and finance minister claimed.

Stating that the CAA harms the foundation of the Indian Constitution, Chidambaram said: “They (BJP Government) have cut the foundation of India’s citizenship premise. They have cut at the premise by saying that citizenship for a certain set of people will be based on religion, not on territory. There are many learned people, who say, so what? That is the superficial view. The deeper cut is, you are changing the basis of citizenship to religion from territory.”

Read- Is the anti-CAA protests a test case for Muslims to find their true political worth in India?

He also said Congress believes the CAA must be repealed and there should be a political struggle so that National Population Register (NPR) is pushed beyond 2024.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKFV_2nnu1s]

Notably, the Congress party has been vociferously opposing the new law that provides citizenship to persecuted minorities from neighbouring Islamic States tooth and nail. Many Congress-ruled States have refused to implement the law passed by both Houses of the Parliament and have been spreading canards about the Ac, even though they have no authority to refuse a central law passed by parliament.

In fact, sufficient proofs have also emerged which have pointed to the nexus between Congress and Islamists in stoking anti-CAA riots.

Read- Intellectuals against Citizenship Amendment Act: The art of lying and use of muscle power

In the Congress manifesto released before Delhi Assembly elections, the party promised to not implement the National Population Register (NPR) and National Register of Citizens (NRC) in its present form. The grand old party also vowed to challenge the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) in the apex court.

NPR is a part of the census and was earlier prepared in 2010-2011 along with the 2011 Census during the Congress-led UPA government. CAA aims to fast-track the citizenship of minorities from three neighbouring countries of Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan who have migrated to India illegally, owing to religious persecution. As for a nationwide NRC, no draft has been laid down by the government. The exercise to update the NRC in Assam was initiated during the Congress government in the state, while by the time it was completed BJP had come to power.

Hard-hitting facts, however, have not stopped the Congress party from casting aspersions about CAA-NRC-NPR.

Intelligence agencies alert UP police about possible attack on Yogi Adityanath at Gorakhnath temple by assailants disguised as journalists

0

The Uttar Pradesh Police has been alerted by Intelligence agencies about a possible terror attack on Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath during his visit to Gorakhnath temple in Gorakhpur.

As reported by the wire agency IANS, the attacker may possibly enter in the guise of a journalist. Yogi Adityanath maintains distance from journalists everywhere, but he’s easily accessible to media in Gorakhpur. He also organizes Janata darbar and meets local people on his visit to Gorakhnath Temple in Gorakhpur.

“Through our officials, we got oral information that security agencies have issued an alert regarding attack on the chief minister. CM Yogi Adityanath is not under threat from any journalist, but unwanted elements in the guise of journalists,” an officer in Gorakhpur said.

Following the alert, the security has been tightened in and around Gorakhnath Temple. The Gorakhpur police are preparing fresh photo identity cards of local journalists for proper scrutiny of their credentials.

In the month of January, 5 members of Islamic fundamentalist organization Popular Front of India were arrested by UP police planning to disrupt Yogi Adityanath’s visit to Kanpur while protesting against CAA.

UP CM Yogi Adityanath is known for his straight forward speeches. He campaigned for BJP in the Delhi assembly elections mainly targetting Aam Aadmi Party, Congress, and the Anti-CAA protestors in Shaheen Bagh. In a public rally, Yogi had given a furious speech mentioning that his government does not feed biryani to terrorists, it was congress’s ritual to do so.

In an interview to BBC, after they termed the Anti-CAA protestors as the descendants of those who stayed back in India during partition, Yogi had affirmed, “They hadn’t done any favour. They hadn’t done any favour to India. When India was partitioned, it should have been opposed. Arguments in favour of India must be supported. Those which are against India must be opposed. This is what our nationalism says and it is also the duty of every Indian citizen.”

Congress leader Jairam Ramesh bats for vegetarianism, calls beef a “huge culprit” in global warming

0

While answering a query over the role of vegetarianism in combating climate change in an event in Kerala, former union minister and senior Congress leader Jairam Ramesh called the beef industry a “huge culprit” in global warming and said that a vegetarian diet is more has a lower carbon footprint than a non-vegetarian one.

“I know that the beef curry is a very important element in Kerala’s diet but there is no doubt in my mind that the carbon footprint of a non-vegetarian diet is greater than the carbon footprint of a vegetarian diet”, said Jairam who was participating in a discussion on the ecosystem of Western Ghats at the Krithi International book fair, organised by a state government-controlled society here.

“I have always held this view that if you want to do something on global warming, become a vegetarian,” Ramesh said. He, however, clarified that the choices about the food are a lifestyle issue.

Read- You want to save the Earth? Then ban beef, not firecrackers

Highlighting the leadership role played by women in leading environment movements in the country”, the senior Congress leader said: I think the environment is a feminist movement in India. If young women take an aggressive role in environmental issues… I am actually a great optimist,” Jairam Ramesh added.

Globally, beef is considered to be responsible for 41 per cent of livestock greenhouse gas emissions, and livestock accounts for 14.5 per cent of total global emission. In fact, according to one expert, eating less red meat, particularly beef, would be a better way for people to cut carbon emissions than giving up their cars.

The production of beef requires 28 times more land than pork or chicken, 11 times more water and results in 5 times more climate-warming emissions. As compared to staples like potatoes, wheat, and rice, the impact of beef per calorie is far more extreme. It requires 160 times more land and produces 11 times more greenhouse gases.

We don’t fight elections only for the results, our objective is to spread our party’s ideology to maximum people: Home Minister Amit Shah

Home Minister Amit Shah, speaking today on day two of the Times Now Summit 2020 in New Delhi, said that he humbly accepts the Delhi election results in which his Bharatiya Janata Party suffered a drubbing, winning just eight of the total 70 Assembly seats.

Speaking about his role in the recently concluded Delhi Assembly Election in which BJP emerged as runners up, Shah said: “I have worked tirelessly for every election, not just for Delhi elections”.

Shah said the BJP doesn’t fight elections just for victory. “We have put our heart and soul into every election, not just in Delhi. It’s not for the first time that we have lost an election. We had lost in Bihar as well as other states. We don’t fight elections only for the results. Our objective is to spread our party’s agenda to maximum people”, Shah told the audience during a fireside chat at the summit.

He stated that BJP campaigns to spread ideology, not just to win. “For many parties, elections are about forming a government or toppling a government. BJP is an ideology based party, for us elections are also elections to enhance our ideology. We don’t fight elections only for victory.”


We humbly accept that we have lost in Delhi. We will now worry about, sitting in Delhi, that this government (AAP government) functions properly,” Amit Shah said.

Read- Home Minister Amit Shah says ready to meet Shaheen Bagh ‘protestors’ to talk on CAA and NRC

Shah denied that the people of Delhi had rejected the BJP. “It’s not like the people rejected us. Kejriwal was third in the Lok Sabha elections. That doesn’t mean that he was rejected by the people of Delhi. Elections are the result of a combination of several factors. Ideology is independent of election results. We did not leave ideology even after sitting in Opposition for decades. We had opposed Article 370 then, we’ve abrogated it now,” he said in response to a question.


“My tweet about winning 45 seats in Delhi had nothing to do with election results, that was my assessment. It happens that assessments go wrong,” he said, clarifying about his tweet a day before the counting of votes in Delhi expressing confidence about forming a BJP government in the capital.

On Shaheen Bagh, Amit Shah said elections are not fought on a single issue. “We made Shaheen Bagh a poll issue and that is still an issue,” he said.

Further speaking on his remark that people should press the button on EVM so hard that current should be felt in Shaheen Bagh, Shah said it’s a certificate from the Opposition that from the entire campaign, they picked up this issue. “I didn’t mean individuals should get current, it is a way to make people understand the issue.”

He accepted that hate remarks like given by West Delhi MP Parvesh Varma on Shaheen Bagh could have hurt the party in Delhi. “We had distanced ourselves from those comments. It is possible that we might have suffered partially because of those comments,” the Home Minister said.

The Bharatiya Janata Party had managed to win 8 seats of the 70 Delhi assembly seats in the recently concluded elections with Delhi’s mandate going in favour of the Aam Aadmi Party which came back to power in the capital by winning 62 out of the 70 seats.

‘Sharjeel Imam spoke of bringing Assam to a halt, so we locked him up in jail’: Amit Shah

Home Minister Amit Shah gave an interview to journalist Navika Kumar at the Times Now Summit. During the interview, the former BJP President touched upon a variety of issues and made his positions clear on several contentious issues. Amit Shah reiterated that there was nothing anti-Muslim about the Citizenship Amendment Act and reminded the country again that numerous Congress governments and politicians since independence have advocated for the exact same provisions in the CAA.

Most significantly, the Home Minister threw his weight behind the actions of the Delhi Police at the height of the anti-CAA riots. Defending the actions of the Police at the Jamia Milia University, he said that the Delhi Police did nothing wrong and said that the response of the Police was adequate given prevailing circumstances.

On the arrest of Sharjeel Imam, the Home Minister said that people should not make extremist statements and that it is dangerous for the country. He said, “As far as Sharjeel Imam is concerned, unhoney Assam band karne ki baat kadhi thi, humne abhi unko band kar kar jail me rakha hai (He had spoken of bringing Assam to a halt, so we have locked him up in jail).”


Amit Shah also said that no decision has been made on the NRC yet. However, he did say that it was in the party manifesto. The Home Minister also said that the BJP does not need a ‘certificate of secularism’ from anyone.

Pravasi Bharatiya Kendra and Foreign Service Institute renamed after Sushma Swaraj on the eve of her birth anniversary

The union government has announced that the Pravasi Bhartiya Kendra and Foreign Service institute will be renamed after former external affairs minister Late Smt. Sushma Swaraj. In a series of tweets, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar informed that the Pravasi Bharatiya Kendra will be renamed as Sushma Swaraj Bhawan and Foreign Service Institute as Sushma Swaraj Institute of Foreign Service.


This announcement was made in the light of the sixty-eighth birthday of Sushma Swaraj on 14 February.


The Pravasi Bharatiya Kendra in New Delhi was inaugurated by prime minister Narendra Modi on October 2, 2016. The decision to construct it was taken by the Atal Bihari Vajpayee government, while the foundation stone was laid by former PM Manmohan Singh in 2011. The Kendra is dedicated to the welfare of the Indian diaspora. It has been developed as a hub of activities for sustainable, symbiotic and mutually rewarding economic, social and cultural engagement between India and its Diaspora. Activities, seminars, events, workshops pertaining to the Indian Diaspora are organised at the Pravasi Bharatiya Kendra, now renamed as Sushma Swaraj Bhawan.

Sushma Swaraj Bhawan

The Foreign Service Institute is the institute in New Delhi where Indian Foreign Service officers are trained. The institute, which functions under the ministry of external affairs, caters to the professional training needs of the trainees of the Indian Foreign Service who are inducted into the service via UPSC every year. The website of the institute has already been updated to reflects its new name, Sushma Swaraj Institute of Foreign Service.

Website of Sushma Swaraj Institute of Foreign Service

Reacting to this announcement by the Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson twitter handle, Governor Swaraj, husband of Sushma Swaraj tweeted in gratitude from him.


Sushma Swaraj was a prominent leader of the Bharatiya Janata Party, had been the youngest cabinet minister in the history of India, the first woman Chief Minister of Delhi and of course one of the longest standing woman politicians of the country.  As a Union Minister in the NDA government, she handled various portfolios and brought radical and important changes in the ministries. She was known as one of the most responsive ministers while handling the Ministry of External Affairs and also known as one of the most popular foreign ministers ever.

Renaming the institutions after a giant like Sushma Swaraj is a tribute to a brilliant leader like her.