Tuesday, April 16, 2024
HomeNews ReportsHDFC Independent Director exposes SEBI analyst and The Wire columnist for deliberately lying about...

HDFC Independent Director exposes SEBI analyst and The Wire columnist for deliberately lying about the bank’s quest for new MD

Securities lawyer Sandeep Parekh has accused SEBI analyst and The Wire columnist Hemindri Hazari, who also happens to be a columnist at the Wire, of writing a slanted opinion piece on HDFC Bank's process to determine the new MD based on established falsehoods

A SEBI Research Analyst, who also happens to be a columnist at the Wire, Hemindra Hazari, wrote to the HDFC bank complaining about “inappropriate behaviour” of an Independent Director on board of the bank, Sandeep Parekh, for debunking lies on Twitter about the bank’s quest for the new MD. Parekh had rubbished ‘source’ based Reuters report on Bank’s process to determine Aditya Puri’s successor on the Twitter following which Hazari not only penned an opinion piece on the unfounded Reuters article but also sought action against Parekh for divulging details of Bank’s internal process in public.

In a scathing attack against conspiracy theorists like Hazari, Sandeep tweeted that when it comes to exposing frauds their frauds, everything is acceptable under ‘freedom of expression’, while when it comes to others, even pointing out their lie is a grave error deserving of retributory action such as getting them axed from their job.

Sandeep Parekh, who is a securities lawyer and serves as an Independent Director on HDFC board had earlier taken to Twitter to debunk misplaced assertions doing the rounds on the Internet about the bank’s search for identifying the new MD. Quoting a Reuters story reported in an Indian daily, Parekh claimed that barring the headlines which read “HDFC Bank to tap Egon Zehnder to identify Aditya Puri’s successor”, rest everything in the article was made-up by the author and factually wrong.

When this was brought to the attention of the SEBI analyst, Hemindra Hazari, he initially trivialised the issue with his tweets and later suggested Parekh and the HDFC bank to approach the courts and initiate legal proceedings against Reuters for doing a story based on unfounded sources.

Read: Shaheen Bagh mastermind and The Wire columnist Sharjeel Imam’s seditious speech well planned, he has no regrets: Delhi Police

Taking After this saga, Hazari posted an opinion piece about the alleged tussle in HDFC bank over the selection of the new MD. Parekh then accused Hazari of deliberately lying since he was privy to his displeasure of the Reuters piece and had interacted over the same with him on Twitter.  “This is a lie-knowingly told because a kind twitter user had brought my tweet (about the Reuters piece) to his attention BEFORE he wrote his ‘opinion'”, Parekh tweeted.

After this, Hazari wrote to the HDFC Bank, claiming himself to be a ‘shareholder’, asking for a list of spokespersons for the HDFC Bank and seeking clarification from the bank on whether it is appropriate for an independent director, a member of the NRC and a member of the selection committee to publicly comment on matters which he has deliberated on and which is price-sensitive information.

Hazari also asked the Bank if Sandeep Parekh’s comments on Twitter on the sensitive issue of the circumstances of selecting a successor to Aditya Puri are in contravention of condition 17 in his letter of appointment as an independent director of HDFC Bank.

In effect, Hazari was tacitly asking the bank to initiate action against Parekh for revealing details in public domain regarding the Bank’s selection process for the new MD.

However, when HDFC Bank did not respond to Hazari’s queries, he threatened to go public on this issue stating that the bank is not responding on an issue pertaining to the inappropriate behaviour of an Independent director.

Responding to these insinuations, Parekh asserted that neither had he breached the law and contract nor had he breached his fiduciary duties. In fact, Parekh stated that he was in line with his fiduciary duties and had supported the law in catching Hazari’s lies.

Parekh further added that it was Hazari who knowingly committed securities fraud and created a false market he knew to be false. Parekh accused Hazari of criticising others based on established falsehoods. “When a rumour is debunked authoritatively, it can no longer be called rumour,’ Sandeep tweeted while implying that despite exposing the lies, Hazari continued to believe them and wrote an opinion piece based on it.

Ayodhra Ram Mandir special coverage by OpIndia

  Support Us  

Whether NDTV or 'The Wire', they never have to worry about funds. In name of saving democracy, they get money from various sources. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

OpIndia Staff
OpIndia Staffhttps://www.opindia.com
Staff reporter at OpIndia

Related Articles

Trending now

‘Opposing Ram Mandir a political weapon for Congress’: PM Modi slams opposition over Ram Mandir, eradicating Sanatana Dharma remark and more

PM Modi emphasised that earlier people close to the Congress party became Election Commissioners, who were later given Rajya Sabha tickets and ministries.

Andolanjeevi Yogendra Yadav peddles fearmongering by Sonia’s NAC boy Jean Dreze, promotes Indian elections are rigged despite offering no proof

In an interview with PTI on Sunday, Jean Dreze, a development economist and Congress leader Sonia Gandhi’s close aide said that “under the wave of authoritarianism” and “suppression of Opposition voices” by the ruling Bhartiya Janata Party, the Lok Sabha elections commencing on the 19th of April are “as good as rigged”.

Recently Popular

- Advertisement -

Connect with us