HomeNews ReportsPalestinian gunman who called for the slaughter of Jews cannot be deported from the...

Palestinian gunman who called for the slaughter of Jews cannot be deported from the UK: How Britain became a haven for Jihadi extremists

A growing number of cases across Britain and other Western countries have raised questions over how immigration systems, universities and media institutions deal with individuals accused of links to jihadist organisations. From alleged extremists navigating asylum and deportation rules to controversial figures gaining access to Western campuses, these cases have intensified scrutiny of institutional safeguards and oversight.

A Palestinian gunman who called for the slaughter of Jewish people cannot currently be deported to Gaza after completing a jail sentence for trying to enter the UK illegally. Abu Wadee, a 34-year-old TikTok influencer who was a member of a terrorist group and posed for pictures with AK-47s, is living in Northamptonshire after being freed from his nine-month sentence. The Home Office is seeking to deport him but cannot do so at present because of the risks to life in the region and the lack of safe and legal routes through which to return to Gaza. Wadee, also known as Mosab Abdulkarim Al-Gassas, pleaded guilty to trying to enter the UK on a small boat on 6th March without leave or valid entry clearance.

He triggered a security scare after posting a video of himself flicking a V for victory sign while at the front of a boat packed with migrants in orange life jackets. His arrival in the UK made national headlines after it emerged that he had posted support for the banned terror group Hamas and hate speech calling for the slaughter of Jewish people on social media. 

A video posted on his Facebook page in June 2021 showed him throwing pipe bombs, and he commands almost 20,000 followers on TikTok. Wadee, from the city of Khan Younis in Gaza, also posted a video on his Facebook page. In September 2024, he uploaded a video calling for Allah to “punish [Jews] completely.”  He also admitted he had been a member of a terrorist group known as the Tyre Burning Unit and had called for the killing of Jews, “eight years ago”.

This is not the only case which proves that the UK is giving a haven to radical Islamists and terrorists, as a pattern of systemic administrative complacency and porous immigration safeguards continues to allow individuals with documented links to terrorists origanisations to embed themselves within British society.

Reopening the floodgates for extremists 

In another attempt to streamline the process for extremists in the UK, Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood has announced the reopening of a scheme to resettle refugees in the UK, as, according to her, offering “safe and legal” routes will deter small boat crossings. The home secretary said the UK wants to “live up to our international obligations” by helping those who are fleeing war and persecution, but the process must be “capped and controlled”. 

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage said the UK is “not obligated to take in more migrants”, adding that if his party were in power, those arriving under Labour’s schemes would “not be able to stay”.

Shabana Mahmood was appointed the new UK Home Secretary, replacing Yvette Cooper following a major Cabinet reshuffle in the Labour-led government in September last year. Mahmood is known for her anti-India and anti-Israel stance; she has her origins in Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir (PoK) and has been a Member of Parliament for Birmingham Ladywood since 2010. 

Her tenure has been marked by controversial decisions, including her earlier defence and justification of freeing killers and rapists in an early release scheme. Mahmood defended her controversial early-release scheme, saying she had little choice but to include some killers, rapists, and child sex offenders because prisons in England and Wales were running out of space.

Mahmood, who designed the scheme when she was Justice Secretary, said the prison system was close to collapse when she took charge of the Ministry of Justice, describing the decisions taken at the time as “unpalatable,” arguing that the government had to act to prevent the entire criminal justice system from being affected. 

Under the original plan, around 6,000 prisoners, including violent and sexual offenders, were due to qualify for early release. Defending the policy, Mahmood stated, “I know how difficult those judgment calls are in the prison system. When I arrived in the Ministry of Justice, the system was on the point of almost total collapse.” She added, “If you run out of prison places entirely, you will see the collapse of the criminal justice system, the police won’t be able to make arrests, and of course there won’t be a trial, and that is not a thing that any government can allow to happen.”

Britain is a haven for terrorists: The case of Hamas’s ex-bodyguard

Britain’s immigration and asylum framework is also providing a haven to terrorists, where individuals with direct ties to the Hamas terrorist group have successfully secured citizenship. Britain granted asylum and later citizenship to a former bodyguard of Hamas terrorist Ismail Haniyeh, who was later arrested over a plot targeting Jewish and Israeli interests in Europe, according to an investigative report published by The Sunday Times. 

The terrorist, identified as “Mr X” because of a court anonymity order, arrived in Britain in 2015. Mr X worked as part of Haniyeh’s personal security detail when Haniyeh was the Hamas leader in Gaza between 2007 and 2017, and he is believed to be the son of Basem Naim, a Hamas terrorist and former Gaza health minister. Reports indicated that his previous work for Haniyeh was known, alongside his familial ties to a senior Hamas official, and he was even reported to have been arrested in Egypt over allegations that he operated a tunnel used to smuggle guns and gold into Gaza.

Despite this background, he claimed asylum in Britain in 2015 and was later granted indefinite leave to remain by the Home Office, subsequently obtaining British citizenship. After becoming a British citizen, he was seen attending demonstrations outside the Israeli embassy. Mr X was arrested in central London by officers from Britain’s National Crime Agency following an international investigation involving German and Israeli security services. He is also accused by German authorities of playing an important role in a weapons and attack plot targeting Israeli and Jewish interests in Germany and Austria, where federal prosecutors charged seven suspected Hamas members over a wider plot to carry out attacks around the second anniversary of the 7th October terror attack.

British media whitewashed terror and passed off Palestinian terrorists as ‘journalists’

The normalisation of these threats is further compounded by mainstream UK media narratives that occasionally obscure the true identities of terrorists involved in terror attacks. The BBC has faced intense, renewed criticism after the broadcaster passed off 53 slain Hamas terrorists as “journalists” who were killed by Israel. According to reports, photographs, and concrete evidence, these individuals actually had direct links to terrorist organisations, including Hamas, with some actively participating in the October 7 attacks while others were openly described as “martyrs” by the terrorist groups themselves. 

Most of these misleading reports identifying the individuals as journalists appeared on BBC Arabic, though an investigative report published by The Telegraph exposed these claims, noting that 10 were also labelled as journalists on the English-language BBC News website. Following this criticism, the BBC claimed it was reviewing information regarding Palestinian terrorists identified in its coverage as journalists killed during the war in Gaza.

The investigation revealed staggering details, such as Abdullah Darwish, whom BBC Arabic described as a cameraman for Hamas’ Al-Aqsa TV, being removed from the Committee to Protect Journalists’ (CPJ) list after undeniable evidence emerged showing he participated in the 7th October terror attack as a terrorist of Hamas’ Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades, complete with photographs wearing a green headband. Similarly, Yacoup al-Borsh, described as the executive director of Namaa Radio, and Rizq Abu Shakian, portrayed as a journalist while footage showed him wearing a Hamas uniform and carrying an automatic rifle, were also removed. Another 20 individuals were labelled as journalists despite terrorist organisations publishing explicit death notices to commemorate them, including Mohamed al-Zaq, Mostafa Bakeer, Abdallah Iyad Breis, and Ahmed Abu Skheil.

Ideological foundations: Islamic jihadi influences in British universities

The intellectual incubation of these radical perspectives finds a home within elite British academic institutions, where figures with histories of Islamic activism are permitted to shape young minds. At the University of Cambridge, Farah Ahmed, an assistant research professor in the Faculty of Education, was appointed to teach undergraduates and supervise postgraduate research despite a long history of radical Islamist activism. Ahmed is a former member of the proscribed Sunni Islamist group Hizb-ut-Tahrir, an organisation dedicated to establishing a global caliphate under Islamic law. 

Throughout her career, Ahmed has denounced Western secular education as a fundamental threat to Islam, openly opposing democracy, social integration, and religious tolerance. Writing in a Hizb-ut-Tahrir publication titled “Education and Identity,” Ahmed argued that the British National Curriculum engaged in systematic indoctrination to build secular citizens, asserting that the Muslim faith directly opposes secular capitalism.

She criticised British schools for teaching against child marriage and polygamy, claiming that schools telling children that “polygamy or marriage under the age of 16 is outdated and discriminatory towards women” was unacceptable. She further attacked the concept of democracy as a “corrupt tradition” and rejected religious tolerance in education because it placed Islam on the same level as Christianity, Judaism, Buddhism, and Hinduism. Ahmed went so far as to label English “one of the most damaging subjects” a school can teach, warning that classic literature like Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet and Macbeth posed dangers by encouraging parental disobedience and questioning fate.

Academic sanctuaries: Radicalisation in British and European campuses

The infiltration of terrorists and jihadists is not confined to the streets and prisons; higher education institutions across Europe have increasingly become platforms for radical Islamists. Another streamlining attempt was highlighted at Maastricht University in the Netherlands. A Hamas terrorist was studying at the university and was involved in the 7th October terror attack on Israel. 

Authorities suspended the terrorist after he posted a video revealing his involvement in the Hamas-led 7th October 2023 massacre. In the video, which went viral on social media, the student watches Qatar’s Al Jazeera outlet airing Hamas propaganda, points at the screen, gives a thumbs-up, and shouts, “7 October. This is me.” Maastricht University decided to ban the student from entering university buildings and bar him from attending classes or sitting for exams. 

The suspended terrorist is one of more than 40 Palestinians from Gaza who were invited by the Dutch government to come to the Netherlands to study or work.

A collective Western trend of providing safe havens to Jihadists 

The Jihadist mindset is not limited to the United Kingdom and is emblematic of a broader and systemic sweep across Western nations, where institutional frameworks, academic enclaves, and immigration policies increasingly provide space for extremist ideologies and Radical Islamists. 

In the United States, similar controversies have erupted, such as when Uju Anya, a Nigerian-American professor at Carnegie Mellon University, went viral on social media over a series of inflammatory posts that triggered a fresh debate about the platforms given by American universities. Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh stated it began reviewing recent social media posts attributed to Anya, describing the remarks as “hostile and threatening” amid mounting backlash.

This dynamic was starkly visible during campus protests surrounding the Israel-Hamas conflict, where encampments sprang up across approximately 30 campuses, marked by high tension, pro-Hamas demands, and slogans such as “Death to Jews” and “Death to America.” This ideological transformation has been fueled by massive foreign financial infiltration, with authoritarian Middle Eastern nations funnelling over $5 billion into American universities, including top recipients like Cornell, Georgetown, Carnegie Mellon, Texas A&M, and Northwestern.

The institutional penetration is further illustrated by figures like Zareena Grewal, an associate professor at Yale University, who faced widespread condemnation after posting statements following the 7th October attacks declaring that “Israel is a murderous, genocidal settler state and Palestinians have every right to resist through armed struggle” and asserting that “Settlers are not civilians.” Despite a petition gathering over 28,000 signatures demanding her removal, Yale University refused to take disciplinary action, defending her statements under freedom of expression. 

Similarly, in Canada, Dr Khdiga R Metwally, mother of a convicted ISIS terrorist who planned to bomb Times Square and the New York City subway system, contested for a public-school board trustee position in Milton, Ontario. Her son, Abdulrahman El Bahnasawy, a Canadian citizen inspired by ISIS, was sentenced to 40 years in federal prison after communicating with handlers in Pakistan and the Philippines and acquiring 40 pounds of hydrogen peroxide. Despite these severe terrorism-related convictions, Metwally sought public office while continuing to defend her son and blame authorities.

Join OpIndia's official WhatsApp channel

  Support Us  

For likes of 'The Wire' who consider 'nationalism' a bad word, there is never paucity of funds. They have a well-oiled international ecosystem that keeps their business running. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

Shriti Sagar
Shriti Sagar
Journalist

Related Articles

Trending now

- Advertisement -