Home Blog Page 3480

Rajasthan: Govt school teacher distributes ‘Hinduism: Dharm ya Kalank’ booklet to students, parents hold protests, inquiry ordered

A lady teacher in the government senior secondary school of Rooppura in Bhilwara of Rajasthan had reportedly distributed among her students a booklet titled ‘Hinduism: Dharm ya Kalank’ in the last week of February 2022. The parents of the students have protested this act by the teacher. Taking cognizance of this, the chief district education officer of Bhilwara Brahma Ram Choudhary has ordered an inquiry in this matter on 2nd March 2022.

Hinduism: Dharm ya Kalank?

Nirmala Kamad is a teacher in the government senior secondary school of Rooppura in the Asind subdivision of the Bhilwara district of Rajasthan. She is accused of distributing a booklet among her students in the school. The booklet is specifically against Hinduism which is clear by its title ‘Hinduism: Dharm ya Kalank?’ which means ‘Hinduism: Religion or Indictment?’. Interestingly this whole text is divided into three sections and the distributed booklet covers all three of them. The book with a green cover also has a quote attributed to Jawaharlal Nehru which says ‘Hindus are definitely lenient and intolerant. No one in the world is as narrow-minded as a Hindu person’.

The cover page of the booklet

The students and villagers complained

The teacher had distributed this booklet in the last week of February 2022. When the parents of these students got to know about this, they came to the school complaining about the incident. The outraging parents locked the school.

According to a report by Navbharat Times, Mukesh Kumar, the principal of the school has informed that the Sarpanch of the village Soniya Gurjar had visited the school on 28th February along with his father Man Roop Gurjar and other villagers accusing the teacher of distributing this booklet.

Man Roop Gurjar said that a student called him up to inform him that the accused teacher propagates misinformation about Hinduism. Students have alleged that she has accused the priests at Ayodhya’s Ram Mandir of using funds collected for construction of Bhavya Ram Mandir for their personal use, he added. “She also gives misinformation about cows. When we tried to talk to her, she threatened us that she would register a case against us under the SC/ST Act. We demand suspension of the teacher,” he said.

The protesting villagers locked the school.

Teacher alleges harassment

The teacher, on the other hand, has accused villagers of discrimination and harassment because of her caste. Nirmala Kamad, the teacher, has said that five months back, Man Roop Gurjar had called on school principal’s number and spoken to her. She alleged that Gurjar had said that villagers were objecting to her leaving her hair untied, coming in a car and wearing spectacles. “Our children will not study with you SC/ST people. Get yourself transferred,” she alleged that Gurjar told her. She also alleged that another Nandlal Khatik was similarly harassed.

The teacher is put on APO (awaiting posting orders)

Amidst the protests by the villagers, Beni Prasad Sargara, the Tahsildar of Asind reached the school along with Asind Police Station in-charge Harish Sankhla and Additional Block Education Officer Bhanwar Lal Sen. After this, the Chief District Education Officer Brahma Ram Choudhary had ordered to put the teacher on APO. The lady teacher is temporarily posted in the office of the Block Education Officer.

School unlocked only after strict action was assured

The additional block education officer Bhanwar Lal Sen had informed that the protesting villagers had closed and locked the gates of the government senior secondary school of Rooppura. He said, “The villagers had complained about a teacher that she had distributed an anti-religious booklet (that is Hinduism: Dharm ya Kalank?) to the students. We had received a complaint letter from the villagers and we will be doing further action based on this complaint.” The gates of the schools were opened after the villagers were satisfied by the assurance of the strict action given by the administration.

Procedural lapses in investigation, evidence tampering, inconsistency in police statements, police concealing facts: What NCPCR report in Lavanya suicide case says

The three-member committee of the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR), probing the suicide case of M Lavanya, has sent its inquiry report to the chief secretary and DGP of Tamil Nadu government. The report stated that the team noticed several procedural lapses during the inquiry. It confirmed that there might exist a possibility of tampering with evidence in the absence of proper compliance with the due procedure of law.

The NCPCR report also accused the Tamil Nadu Police of not filing a complaint about the conversion angle, which was the cause of the suicide according to the family and was also mentioned in Lavanya’s dying declaration. The reports also accused the school of not letting Lavanya’s mother take the dead body of her daughter until they did not pay off the full school fee for the deceased victim.

SS from the inquiry report submitted by NCPCR in the M Lavanya suicide case

Lavanya, who was studying in class 12 at Sacred Heart Higher Secondary School in Michaelpatti near Thanjavur, committed suicide by drinking pesticide after she was tortured to convert to Christianity by the school. Lavanya’s parents said that there was an attempt to forcefully convert their child and become a nun which the child had rejected and hence was subject to torture.

The NCPCR said in its report that the statutory body had taken cognisance of this incident after it received “3545 odd complaints for requests pertaining to initiate inquiry against the allegations in connection to this incident.”

“Looking into the gravity of the situation, and the lenient stand of the State Authorities in the present matter, regarding the death of a minor girl in Thanjavur, a team of three officials headed by Chairperson NCPCR Shri Priyank Kanoongo, Ms Madhulika Sharma, Advisor (Education), and Ms Katyayani Anand, Consultant (Legal) visited Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu on 30th and 31st of January 2022 for the purpose of conducting a thorough inquiry in the matter,” NCPCR said.

The NCPCR team headed by Chairperson Priyank Kanongo in the inquiry report mentioned that the team had interacted with the Superintendent of Police, Investigating Officer, Chief Education Officer, doctors who treated the minor girl and doctors who conducted the autopsy, grandparents and family from the maternal side (biological mother) of the minor girl, etc at the Railway Officers Rest House, Thanjavur to conduct a fair probe in the case.

During the inspection and investigation, NCPCR investigators observed a lot of discrepancies and shortcomings on the part of the school administration.

School authorities and police laxity in handling M Lavanya suicide case

The NCPCR inquiry report firstly pointed out how the NCPCR team found shortcomings in the school authorities’ initial actions to care for the minor girl after she had fallen ill. It further stated that when the NCPCR team reached Sacred Heart Higher Secondary School, Michaelepatt in Thanjavur in Tamil Nadu, where the class 12 student died of suicide, they discovered that there were no separate rooms or accommodations for the children’s stay.

The report further added that the hall where the deceased girl was staying had been cleaned and that essential objects such as furniture, books, clothes, and children’s belongings had been removed, leading to a possibility of evidence tampering, said the report.

Further, the team observed that the alleged crime scene was not sealed and cordoned for the purpose of the investigation by the local Police.

Looking at the current situation at the alleged crime scene, the NCPCR team came to the conclusion that there was a chance of evidence tampering in the lack of adequate legal procedure.

Implying police laxity in handling the suicide case of M Lavanya, the report further stated that during the interaction with the Investigating Officer (IO) and the Superintendent of Police (SP), the team was made aware that the warden of the boarding (the hall where children were kept), who had been named as a prime accused, had also not been taken to the crime scene to recreate the alleged incident and seizure of evidence.

The report added that the investigating officer also informed the NCPCR team that they did not seek the Police Remand of the warden who is one of the prime accused in the instantaneous matter. It added that the police have, to date, not identified the vendor or the source from which the alleged substance/poison/herbicide had been procured.

The NCPCR team further observed various anomalies in the statements made by the IO and the SP.

“The steps taken by the investigating authorities were observed to be not in line with the rules of procedure that should have been adopted in case of investigation into the death of a minor girl. This creates suspicion whether the investigating agency is doing a fair investigation or not”, read the report.

School authorities collected fees from the mother before M Lavanya could be taken for treatment: NCPCR

Further highlighting the apathy of the school authorities and the Tamil Nadu police pertaining to the M Lavanya suicide case, the NCPCR report stated that before the deceased girl was allowed to be taken for treatment to the other hospital, the school authorities collected fees from the mother. The Commission observed that no inquiry had taken place against this action of the school authorities for taking a fee from the mother of the deceased child.

SS from the inquiry report submitted by NCPCR in the M Lavanya suicide case

Another scathing observation made by the NCPCR team probing the suicide case of a Class 12 student of Thanjavur was that the investigating authorities were somewhere trying to conceal material facts pertaining to the child while she was staying in the CCI and also ignored all the pleadings made by the family to investigate regarding the minor being forced to convert into Christianity.

“It was observed by NCPCR that the authorities were trying to turn the incident into a story of the minor having an evil stepmother, and how that stepmother forced the deceased child to do household work. However, during the visit, through the interaction with the school and the police, the NCPCR was made aware of how the minor girl was made to do official work of the CCI by the warden like bookkeeping, accounting, store management etc and other work like cleaning the premises, washing toilets, opening the door etc,” read the report.

It added that authorities were attempting to conceal important details about the child while also ignoring the family’s pleas for an investigation into the minor being compelled to convert to Christianity.

SS from the inquiry report submitted by NCPCR in the M Lavanya suicide case

Key violations of the Juvenile Justice Act of 2015 and its Rules of 2016, as well as a variety of other anomalies

The report further specified the legal bounding that the school authorities had not been adhering to. It said that the school was housing children without a valid registration under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015, which is a mandatory requirement.

The report added that the minor girl despite having parents and family was illegally being kept in the CCI premises and was not produced before the Child Welfare Committee (CWC) by the authorities, which is another compulsory requirement as per Section 37 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015.

“Therefore it was observed that due procedure with regard to institutionalisation of child was clearly not followed by the District Authorities. It was further observed that the deceased girl staying in the CCI was not produced before the CWC and was being kept illegally,” read the inquiry report.

It further stated that the crucial standards pertaining to the infrastructure and child care facilities, that ought to be followed by each CCI were found to be less than prescribed norms in this particular CCI which housed M Lavanya.

It NCPCR committee further observed that as mandated by the law, there was no exclusive officer- Special Juvenile Police Unit to exclusively deal with children either as victims or perpetrators, in accordance with Section 107 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015.

Recommendations made by NCPCR

The report mainly addressed recommendations to the Chief Secretary and the Director-General of the Police (DGP).

  • To take action against the district authorities who had failed to take action as per JJ Act, 2015 despite the school housing children without a valid registration.
  • To provide necessary counselling, compensation and assistance to the parents and the brother of the deceased girl.
  • To inquire how many such institutes are functioning under the Tamil Nadu Hostel and Homes for Women and Children Regulation) Act 2014 and Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 and provide a list of the same to NCPCR.
  • To shift all the children residing in the said CCI following due procedure immediately

For DGP:

To take disciplinary action against the District Police Officials for not following the due process of investigation and conducting a fair investigation.

NCPCR says Tamil Nadu govt not cooperating in probe of M Lavanya suicide case

The National Commission for Protection of Child Rights had sent a team to Thanjavur in Tamil Nadu to probe the suicide of M Lavanya. A press release issued by the NCPCR said that a team headed by Chairperson Priyank Kanongo would visit Thanjavur district in Tamil Nadu to inquire into the suicidal death of the minor girl of the Sacred Heart Higher Secondary School, Michaelepatt, as the child rights body has received a complaint regarding the matter.

In a dying declaration recorded on video, the 7-year-old girl student had alleged that her school was pressurising her to convert to Christianity, and had tortured her for refusing to leave Hinduism. However, the police and the media had tried to cover up the conversion angle in the case and alleged that the girl killed herself because the school had asked her to do some regular chores.

Therefore, the NCPCR had decided to visit the spot between 30 and 31 January to ascertain the facts of the case. NCPCR also said that the Tamil Nadu government is not cooperating with it in the case, and therefore the commission will make all arrangements itself for the probe.

British Journalist tries to shame India over ‘aid’ for not towing UK’s line on Ukraine issue, gets reminded of his country’s dark colonial history

India’s abstention in the UN on the resolution of aggression against Ukraine has surprised many foreign experts on international relations. But British News Presenter Alastair Stewart saw this as an opportunity to mock India over its decision to strategize its national interests and not towing the western line.

It came after India, along with 34 other countries decided to abstain on the draft resolution concerning the aggression on Ukraine after the Russian Invasion of the country in the last week of February. While an unprecedented number of 141 counties took the NATO line to unite against Russia, India taking a neutral stand pressed that ‘dialogue and diplomacy’ could only solve the conflict.

However, Understanding India’s nuanced stance on the issue underlined by its equations with Russia and the presence of stranded nationals in war-torn Ukraine seems well above the pay grade of some international diplomacy experts in the west. Many of this cabal have resorted to making racist, derogatory and patronizing snides against India, entrenched in their continued colonial outlook.

On Thursday, British News Presenter Alastair Stewart while noticing India’s abstention over the resolution commented, “Pretty predictable but India and Pakistan should hang their heads in shame and, henceforth, receive not a penny piece in aid from the UK.” While Stewart seems to be aware of the history of India’s continued non-alignment in world affairs, he did not miss an opportunity to ‘tell’ the former colony nations to be ‘ashamed’ of their sovereign decisions.

Moreover, his remarks on British ‘aid’ to India have caught much ire amongst Indians and on Twitter that they are giving a good class to Alastair Stewart in coloniality. Renowned Indian Author, Scientist and Political critic Anand Ranganathan reminded Stewart on Twitter, “This butler probably doesn’t know that in 1947, Britain owed India 1.4 billion pounds, that it finally returned in 2001,”

Indians reminded the entitled British presenter on the British loot of India, which from 1767 to 1938 amounted to over US$ 45 trillion. To put this into perspective, the total loot estimated is 15 times that of the current GDP of India (close to 3 Trillion USD). Krithika Sivaswamy replied, “You owe us, buddy. It’s out of magnanimity (most would agree it’s foolish) that we have ignored to ask the UK to return with interest the total debt, including war debts.”

Calling out the British Museum in London which is often termed as the British Warehouse of Colonial loot, a Twitter user compared it with a high definition version of Chor Bazaar in Mumbai.

Going beyond the past while considering the present scenario, Indian businesses continue to be one of the largest investors in the UK while the diaspora contributes to a whopping 6% of the British GDP. Contrasting this with British contributions to India, Twitter user Joseph T Noony asked, “The 1.6% Indian diaspora contributes a disproportional 6%(?) to UK’s GDP. What’s your contribution to India? $45 trillion loot? Pakistan?”

Indian experts also reminded Alastair Stewart that while India does not need the condescending ‘British aid’ anymore, it was already stopped in 2015.

Poor Stewart and his racist followers were seen justifying the cause of the Empire, while Indians did not leave a chance in giving them a good lesson in history. Self-appointed global analysts often put themselves on pedestals while preaching the world over ‘values’, but in reality, they buckle down under their self-imposed white-man’s burden.

Hindu group stopped from cleansing Shivalinga inside Dargah premises stating ‘urs’ on Maha Shivratri in Karnataka’s Aland, 167 arrested

A tense situation has prevailed near Ladle Mashak Dargah in the Aland town of Kalaburgi district, Karnataka, after a Muslim mob resorted to stone pelting against Hindu activists and police personnel on Tuesday.

According to the reports, Hindu groups had planned to offer puja to Raghavachaitanya Shivalinga located inside the Ladle Mashak Dargah premises.

The Hindu groups wanted to cleanse the idol by performing puja after some miscreants had thrown human faeces on the Shivalinga recently. Hence, the Hindu activist group Sri Rama Sene had proposed the purification of the Raghavachaitanya Shivalinga at the dargah on March 1 to mark Maha Shivaratri.

Ahead of the events, the Kalaburagi police had prohibited the entry of Sri Ram Sene founder Pramod Muthalik, Hindu activist Chaitra Kundapura and Siddalinga Swami in the Kalaburagi district till March 3. However, the Hindu groups took out the procession from Aland’s bus stand as planned amidst the prohibitory orders.

As the Hindu groups marched towards the dargah, a Muslim mob assembled outside the premises to stop the peaceful rally. Apparently, the local Muslims had planned a procession to mark Shabab-e-Barat to pay respects to the dead at the shared dargah on the same day.

The Muslim mob assembled near the dargah flashed sharp weapons, sticks and other armaments as Hindu groups approached the dargah. The dargah committee office-bearers locked the gate, saying they would not allow them inside.

The enraged mob pelted stones at them as they encountered Hindu activists, leaving many injured. The mob also pelted stones on the vehicles of Union Minister Bhagwanth Khuba, former MLA BR Patil, including the Deputy Commissioner and the Superintendent of Police.   

As tension gripped the city, the police officials deployed additional forces to maintain law and order. The police used drones to keep a strict vigil on the activities as there were rumours that stones have been stocked on the terraces of the houses to attack the Hindu groups.

Later in the day, the district administration finally achieved a breakthrough after holding a series of negotiation talks with both groups. The district authority allowed 11 people to purify the Shivalinga and offer puja as a compromise between the two sides.

The Kalaburgi police have arrested more than 167 persons, including ten women, for their role in the clashes in Aland. The police have also extended prohibitory orders until March 5 to restore peace, law and order.

Meanwhile, a Muslim mob assembled on the streets of Kalaburgi to condemn the arrests of attackers. They demanded the release of persons accused of pelting stones at Hindu groups and police personnel.

Delhi Police opposes bail plea of sedition accused Sharjeel Imam, say he may threaten witnesses, re-engage in riot-like activities

On Wednesday, the Delhi Police opposed the bail plea of the JNU student Sharjeel Imam who has been arrested in a sedition case and said that he had instigated a particular religious community against the government during the anti-CAA protests in Delhi. Opposing the bail plea of Delhi riots accused, the Police said that if granted bail, Imam could influence the witnesses by threatening them and re-engaging in riot-like activities.

The Delhi Court on January 24 framed charges against the Imam for allegedly making inflammatory speeches at Aligarh Muslim University and in the Jamia area during the protest against the Citizenship Amendment Act. According to the Police, Imam’s speech which he had addressed to the Muslim community was specifically to instigate violence and he had also misled the students by mentioning fake detention camps.

The Delhi Police in its reply to the Delhi High Court said that the case is sensitive and if Imam is approved bail, he may evade the process of law and jump, threaten the public witnesses and may indulge in similar crimes again. The Police also said that Imam had tried to spread false rumours of genocide in Assam through his speeches. He through his speeches, instigated a particular religious community of Assam to cut it off from central India.

Further according to the Police, the statements made in the speech come under Section 124A and 153A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The Police also said that the location of the accused’s phone was at Jamia Millia Islamia on December 13, 2019 and at Shaheen Bagh on December 15.

On December 13, 2019, Sharjeel Imam had spread misinformation and had incited the gathering to revolt against the government. He had asked the general public to block the ingress and egress to 500 cities in India, which have a substantial Muslim population. He had also promoted enmity between different groups of society on religious grounds.

Sharjeel Imam had applied for bail in the case registered against him and said that all the co-accused, who were arrested for allegedly causing the violence, have been granted bail in the case while he was still in prison for over 20 months. The bail application further mentioned that Imam had not even been named in the FIR and was deliberately targeted by the investigation agency.

Earlier the trial court had also denied Imam’s bail plea and had claimed that free speech was not to be exercised at the cost of communal peace and harmony. The trial court had ruled that the evidence presented in the case showed that Imam had influenced the act of rioting and mischief.

“The tone and tenor of the incendiary speech tend to have a debilitating effect upon public tranquillity, peace, and harmony of the society. It is no gainsaying that fundamental right of ‘freedom of speech and expression’ cannot be exercised at the cost of communal peace and harmony of the society”, the trial court was quoted.

It is important to note that Imam is also accused to be the mastermind of the February 2020 riots, which had left 53 people dead and over 700 injured. However, the Delhi court on January 24 ordered the imposition of several other sections including sedition, punishment for unlawful activities (UAPA) against Sharjeel Imam. The sections will be invoked over the toxic speeches made by him during the anti-CAA protests in Delhi.

Biden administration mulling whether to apply or waive sanctions against India over S-400 deal with Russia: US Diplomat

On Wednesday, March 2, USA diplomat Donald Lu said that the Biden administration is considering whether to apply or waive sanctions against India for its purchase of the S-400 Triumf missile defence system from Russia under the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA). The speculations of US imposing sanctions on India after India abstained from voting against Russia in the UNSC and then UN.

According to Lu, the Biden administration has yet to decide whether or not to impose sanctions on India under CAATSA. “What I can say is that India is a really important security partner of ours now and that we value moving forward that partnership,” he said.

Notably, despite a warning from the then-Trump administration that proceeding with the contract could result in US sanctions under the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA), India had struck a USD 5 billion deal with Russia in October 2018 to buy five S-400 air defence missile systems.

CAATSA is a tough US law that was brought in 2017 and authorises the US administration to impose sanctions on countries that purchase major defence hardware from Russia.

India has been a leading buyer of Russian arms and ammunition. Notably, the US Government has delayed enforcing a statute that would have imposed sanctions on India for trading with Russia as the US deepens its ties with India as a key regional counterweight to China. Moreover, India has increased the purchase of military equipment from the USA, including helicopters and transport planes.

Speaking to the Sun, Lu remarked that India had just cancelled orders for Russian MiG-29 fighter planes, helicopters, and anti-tank weapons and that the new penalties would encourage other countries to do the same.

He told legislators that Russia is unlikely to be able to sell new systems or provide maintenance for current ones.

It may be recalled the Indian Defence Ministry had on January 14, 2022, decided to withdraw tenders for deals related to buying short-range surface-to-air missiles and 14 helicopters. The decision was taken after Prime Minister Modi took a review meeting with the Defence Ministry officials, including the then Chief of Defence Staff General Bipin Rawat, where it was felt that strong measures would have to be taken to ensure that the country moves firmly towards Aatmanirbhar Bharat in the defence sector.

India abstains on UNGA and UNSC resolution that condemns Russia’s action against Ukraine

The remark by the US diplomat came after India maintained its neutral stance on Wednesday, abstaining from voting on a UN General Assembly resolution strongly condemning Russia’s actions against Ukraine.

India’s abstention was in line with what the government previously described as the country’s consistent position, which permits it to reach out to both sides in the crisis and find a solution via diplomacy and negotiation.

The UNGA resolution was similar to one circulated in the UN Security Council’s 15-member body last Friday, on which India had also abstained. After permanent member Russia exercised its veto, the UNSC resolution, which had 11 votes in favour and three abstentions, was blocked.

Following the Council’s failure to adopt the resolution, the Security Council agreed on Sunday to call a special “emergency special session” of the 193-member General Assembly to address the problem. India once again chose to abstain reiterating that “there is no other choice but to return back to the path of diplomacy and dialogue”.

Since the Russia-Ukraine invasion, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has spoken with both Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Russia’s Vladimir Putin, expressing concern over the violence.

The repeated attacks against Sara Ali Khan by Islamists: What it means and why the Hindu community would be remiss to dismiss it

On Mahashivratri, when Hindus worship Lord Shiva, Sara Ali Khan, the daughter of Saif Ali Khan and Amrita Singh, was abused and attacked on social media yet again because she posted a picture of performing puja at the Omkareshwar Temple Jyotirlinga. Members of the Muslim community descended in her mentions on Instagram abusing her for performing ‘Shirk’. ‘Are you a Muslim?’ was a common comment under her picture.

In one of the pictures, one individual belonging to the Muslim community said that it is understandable that despite being a Muslim, she wears short clothes and acts in movies, but performing Shirk is an absolute sin.

The Quran stresses in many verses that God does not share his powers with any partner (sharīk). It warns those who believe their idols will intercede for them that they, together with the idols, will become fuel for hellfire on the Day of Judgment (21:98). Shirk in Islam is, therefore, idolatry, polytheism, and the association of God with other deities.

In this context, the comment of the Muslim individual becomes extremely important. For the average Muslim, it would appear, no sin is greater than that of Shirk – worshipping Hindu deities, in the context of India.

For most, social media comments are just that – social media comments that must be summarily ignored as the rants of deranged minds who have nothing better to do in life, except of course, when they abuse the likes of Rana Ayyub – then they become the symbols of Hindu terrorism – but we will discuss that some other day.

The attacks against Sara Ali Khan aren’t new or one-off. She was abused for visiting the Ujjain Mahakal Temple, the Kedarnath temple and even for wishing Home Minister Amit Shah on his birthday.

Repeatedly, on almost every Hindu festival, Islamists descend in her mentions abusing her for committing Shirk, for being a bad Muslim – some abuse, some post Quran verses, some issue threats and others simply ask her to leave Islam if she is so drawn towards Kafirs and their religion.

I would be remiss if I did not admit that the attacks against Khan have become so frequent, that when she was attacked recently, I paused before covering and eventually, let it slide. How many times do we cover the same issue, I had remarked – she gets abused every single day. It was only later that I realised that my reaction was precisely the problem and how I had done injustice to the subject by not covering the latest incident.

Essentially, by not covering the vile attack against Khan, I ended up normalising the barbaric Islamic attack on anyone who shows reverence to the Hindu faith. I let down ex-Muslims, anyone who worships Hindu Gods and Goddesses and most of all – Hindus.

Let me explain how.

As the editor-in-chief of OpIndia, there is a deep sense of realisation that we are not really like Times of India. We don’t cover everything. We don’t write 100 reports a day and cover every incident under the sun. OpIndia has a specific brief. We cover what we think is necessary for the cause of Hindus and Bharat.

The unbridled hate of the Islamists, directed towards the Hindu community, our faith and our Gods and Goddesses has been a large part of what we aim to cover in OpIndia. While the mythical beast of Islamophobia is mainstreamed, the irrepressible hatred against Hindus, their genocide, their murders and iconoclasm has been summarily ignored in the pages of history and therefore, the real and present dangers that Hindus face have been buried under sheets of secularism, political correctness and the importance we seem to give to the phenomenon of Sarva Garam Vada Pao, foisted upon us by Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi.

The attacks we see against Sara Ali Khan aren’t random – we have seen such concerted attacks before by the Muslim community and they have, almost always, stemmed from the same malaise that cannot be ignored no matter how repetitive it gets. The unintended consequence of ignoring the attacks against Khan, just because they have become usual and repetitive, only ends in the normalisation of hatred against Hindus and their Deities, a consequence we must be mindful of.

Every time such attacks happen, one has to hear canards about Islam being a religion of peace and all the violence that has somehow been sanctioned by Islam are misinformation being spread by Islamophobes. Then comes the reply that all religions are the same and therefore, indoctrinated elements exist in all religions. Essentially, the apologists of Islam say that all religions are equal (teaching love, brotherhood and peace) and such comments on posts like Sara’s should be ignored because a few bad apples do not define the adherents of faith in totality.

At the very outset, it suffices to say that no other religion in the world, at this point in time in history, lays out a doctrine for the torture, subjugation, conversion and humiliation of all the people who refuse to believe in their faith, other than Islam.

No other religion in the world has left behind a trail of mangled bodies, blood and gore in its wake as much as Islam and what is worse is that this carnage was sanctified in their religion, in fact, it is one of the necessities of their religion. Moral relativists and apologists of Islam often say that Islam is a religion of peace and it is its adherents who have distorted the peaceful version of Islam. 

And therefore, any threats made by the Muslim community has to be amplified and taken seriously, not ignored and normalised. Almost on a daily basis, we hear “Gau Mutra” jibes being thrown at Hindus. While it is just “trolling” for those who want to apologise for Islam’s deep-seated hatred, it is an indication of the malaise that ails the Muslim community, as evidenced by the fact that even the Pulwama terrorist used the “Gau Mutra” jibe in his video. He blew himself up. One has to then wonder what really is the difference between those who make these comments online and those who blow themselves up offline.

For thousands of years, Hindus have been subjugated by the Islamist invaders who have raped Hindu women, beheaded our kings, murdered our children all for the ultimate goal of the establishment of the Caliphate. There are countless tales of how the Islamic invaders murdered Hindus and kept their wives, mothers and daughters as slaves – the spoils of war.

The barbarity was so perverse, that Hindu women often chose to jump into the fire and give up their lives after Hindus were defeated in war, lest they were taken slaves by Islamic invaders. You might wonder why they didn’t simply slit their wrists instead of stepping into the burning fire – well – they did not want their corpse to be desecrated by the followers of Islam who had laid siege on their land. 

The brutality is not just limited to Islamic invaders. In the modern political landscape of India, Hindus were humiliated during the partition as well. One recalls how the Khilafat movement claimed the lives of countless Hindus during the Moplah massacres by Islamists and even the Direct Action Day, spearheaded by Jinnah. After the countless deaths of Hindus, our own, MK Gandhi, asked Hindus to simply lay down their lives if the Islamists chose to claim it. 

During partition, Hindus were mutilated and their women raped. At the altar of ‘secularism’, which the Atheists love to espouse, India decided to not conduct a full exchange of population, a suggestion that was made by various luminaries at the time including Dr B.R. Ambedkar, and thus, began another cycle of subjugation in modern India. This year itself, we saw riots by sections of the Muslim community and aided by the Left against the Hindus.

The saga of brutality continues to this day not just in India, but also, against the minority Hindus of Pakistan and when India decided that the minority Hindus could take refuge in India, their natural home post-partition, the Islamists ran riots yet again. They stabbed a Hindu over 50 times simply because he was Hindu and chopped off the arms and legs of another before burning him alive.

Therefore, every comment against Sara Ali Khan is not just an attack against her, but when Islamists abuse her for visiting temples, it is essentially their hate for Hindus, Hinduism, Polytheism and their generational need for iconoclasm. Every temple desecrated, every Hindu killed, every incident of abuse, offline or online, needs to be documented with clinical precision and an unswerving commitment – documenting the siege against our people and our faith cannot be cast aside simply because it is repetitive.

‘Leave no one behind’: Indian students allowed to bring pet animals along in evacuation flights. Watch visuals

Amidst the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, some of the Indian nationals who were being evacuated were worried about their pet dogs and cats. On March 2, the Indian government issued a special advisory allowing the Indian nationals to bring along their pets from Ukraine back to India. After the advisory was issued, visuals surfaced on social media platforms where Indians have seen boarding evacuation flights with their pets.

Union Minister General (Rtrd) VK Singh, who is currently in Poland coordinating the evacuation drive under Operation Ganga, shared multiple posts of pets being rescued along with the Indian nationals. In a 21-second video shared on Twitter, Singh was seen petting the dog brought by one of the evacuees. He wrote, “Some of the evacuees brought their four-legged best friends as well. Good to have all of our Indian Students aboard on the Indian Air Force C-17 Globemaster ready to return to the safety of our motherland.”

Quoting a post by Journalist Manav Yadav who had shared the story of dog Neela being brought back with his owner Yukta from Ukraine, Singh said, “Happy to be of service. I am sure Neela would have been a well-behaved passenger. Will see both of you again when I am back.” Yukta had thanked Singh for his support in bringing back her dog to India.

News Agency ANI shared a post about an Indian Zahid who had brought back a dog that originally belonged to his friend in Ukraine. He said, “I have brought my friend’s dog with me from Ukraine. Many people who had dogs left them behind in Ukraine, but I brought back this dog along with me.”

Another student Gautam had brought back a cat from Ukraine. He said, “his cat has been with me for the past four months. It stayed with me in the bunker, and then we crossed into Poland together.”

Govt of India relaxed conditions to import pets from war-hit Ukraine

On March 2, the Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Government of India, issued an official memorandum relaxing the conditions to import pets from war-hit Ukraine.

In the memorandum, the ministry issued specific guidelines that the Indian nationals have to follow if they want to bring their pets along from Ukraine. The pet owner is required to produce a pet passport, vaccination documents along with other details. Proper certification from a vet and mandatory quarantine was also advised in the memorandum.

‘Wanted Dead or Alive’: Russian Businessman announces $1million bounty on President Vladimir Putin

A Russian-born entrepreneur has put a $1 million bounty on the head of President Vladimir Putin.

Recently, Russian-born entrepreneur Alex Konanykhin offered $1 million to any military officer who catches Russian President Vladimir Putin “dead or alive” for allegedly committing “war crimes” in his invasion of Ukraine.

“I promise to pay $1,000,000 to the officer(s) who, complying with their constitutional duty, arrest(s) Putin as a war criminal under Russian and international laws,” wrote Konanykhin on Facebook.

In his post, Konanykhin claimed that Putin is not the Russian president since he came to power as the result of a special operation of blowing up apartment buildings in Russia, then violated the Constitution by eliminating free elections and murdering his opponents.

“As an ethnic Russian and a Russian citizen, I see it as my moral duty to facilitate the denazification of Russia. I will continue my assistance to Ukraine in its heroic efforts to withstand the onslaught of Putin’s Orda,” added the businessman.

The post was accompanied by an image with a photo of Putin that read, “Wanted: Dead or alive. Vladimir Putin for mass murder.”

Facebook post of Alex Konanykhin/ Image Source: Petr Dragoun

The Russian-based businessman has now deleted the post.

However, in another post, Alex Konanykhin asked a thousand other people to chip in a million each to the bounty to make it a billion.

According to a report, Konanykhin shares a rough past with the Russian government. Konanykhin, who studied at the Moscow Physics and Technical Institute, entered into several businesses, including banking, stocks and real estate.

He had built an empire of over 100 firms worth about $300 million by 1992. He was even a part of then-Russian President Boris Yeltsin’s first delegation to Washington that year.

In 1996, during his stay in the US, Konanykhin and his wife were arrested by federal immigration agents on charges of violating the conditions of their American visas. The arrests had come after Russian authorities had alleged that he embezzled $8 million from the Russian Exchange Bank in Moscow.

During the trial, Konanykhin had testified that some of his corporate aides at the Russian Exchange Bank began pressurising him for money and issued threats. He had said that he left for Hungary, where he received more threats, prompting him to flee to the Czech Republic and then to New York.

ICC to start investigation against Russian President Putin over war crimes

Meanwhile, the International Criminal Court (ICC) has also announced it will be investigating Russia over possible war crimes committed following the invasion of Ukraine.

In a statement, ICC chief prosecutor Karim Khan revealed that he believes “alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity have been committed in Ukraine” and an investigation into Russia’s actions will be launched as rapidly as possible.

He had said the probe was initiated after 39 countries that are parties to the Rome Statute had petitioned the ICC to begin an investigation.

The announcement comes days after widely-banned cluster munitions killed one child and two adult civilians at a preschool in Okhtyrka, Ukraine.

The ICC prosecutor had claimed that there was a “reasonable basis” to believe that war crimes have occurred during the Russian-Ukraine conflict.

Ukraine: Russian forces take control of Kherson in the south, mayor says there are no Ukrainian troops in the city

On March 2, Kherson, one of the major cities of Ukraine reportedly came under Russian control, as per reports.

Ihor Kolykhaiev, Mayor of Kherson, wrote a post on his Facebook account asking the residents to follow the orders of the Russian soldiers. Kherson houses around 2,90,000 people, and it is located at around 480 KM south of Kyiv. The Russians had claimed they had captured the city hours before the official announcement from the Ukrainian officials.

Kherson is strategically important because it provides land connectivity to Crimea.

Ihor Kolykhaiev, Mayor of Kherson’s post on Facebook. Translated by Facebook.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, in an early morning address on Thursday, urged the people of Ukraine to keep resisting the Russian Army. In a social media post, he had said, “We are a people who in a week have destroyed the plans of the enemy.” Notably, he did not comment on if Russia has taken control of the major cities, including Kherson. He claimed the Russians would be driven out from the locations they had entered.

New Agency AFP said one million people have already fled from Ukraine since Russia initiated military action. Gennady Lakhuta, head of the regional administration, wrote in a post on Telegram messaging service that the Russians have occupied the majority of the locations in the city. He said, “The (Russian) occupiers are in all parts of the city and are very dangerous.”

Natalie Gallon, Reporter at CNN, said in a social media post that the Russian troops were seen walking under stress after the intense fight. Kherson houses a key bridge that connects Crimea to the rest of Ukraine.

Russia’s military action against Ukraine

On February 24, Russia announced military action against Ukraine. In the last one week, Ukraine and Russia have blamed each other for the situation. Meanwhile, India has abstained from voting against Russia in the United Nations Security Council. Reportedly, there were around 20,000 Indian nationals in Ukraine when the war broke. Over 12,000 Indians have been evacuated from the war-torn country. Out of these 12,000, over 6,000 have been brought back to India. Indian Air Force has also joined the evacuation process.

Four Union Ministers have been coordinating the evacuation from the neighbouring countries. On Wednesday, Indian Embassy in Ukraine had issued an urgent advisory to the Indian nationals in Kharkiv to leave the city immediately and provided a list of three locations in three different directions, including one in Russia where they can go for further evacuation.